Bibliography

Research on the Technology Implementation Process

Bibliography | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 1

Aaron, M. (2005). Swinging from a tree: Can the process of technological integration be

improved using Fault Tree Analysis? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1051–1054.

Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about

technology integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–144.

Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2003). On sustainability of project innovations as systemic

change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14(1), 1–26. Agnew, D. W. (2011). Administrative obstacles to technology use in West Virginia public

schools: A survey of West Virginia principals. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.

Albee, J. J. (2003). A study of preservice elementary teachers’ technology skill

preparedness and examples of how it can be increased. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 53–71.

Amirian, S. (2007). Digital backpacks: Facilitating faculty implementation of technologies

for teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 24(1/2), 5–14. An, Y., & Reigeluth, C. (2011–12). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered

classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62.

Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2000). School technology leadership: Incidence and impact.

Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_6/

Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical

investigation of prevalence and impact. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49–82.

Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology:

Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers and Education, 45(4), 383–398.

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning.

The Economic Journal, 112, 735–765. Anthony, A. B. (2012). Activity theory as a framework for investigating district -classroom

system interactions and their influences on technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(4), 335–356.

Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in

organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234–245.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 2

ASCD. (2012). Fulfilling the promise of the Common Core State Standards: Moving from

adoption to implementation to sustainability. Retrieved from http://educore.ascd.org/resource/Download/1d60f46d-b786-41d1-b059-95a7c4eda420

Bakia, M., Mitchell, K., & Yang, E. (2007). State strategies and practices for educational

technology: Volume I—Examining the Enhancing Education through Technology program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Barab, S., & Dede, C. (2007). Games and immersive participatory simulations for science

education: An emerging type of curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 1–3.

Barnett, H. (2002, May 1). How to guarantee a learning return on your technology

investment. eSchool News, pp. 1–5. Barnette, E. J. (2003). The role of technology teachers in ensuring standards-based

programs. Technology Teacher, 62(7), 32–35. Barron, A. E., Dawson, K., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). Peer coaching and technology

integration: An evaluation of the Microsoft peer coaching program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(10), 83–102.

Barron, A. E., Ivers, K. S., Lilavois, N., & Wells, J. A. (2006). Technology for education: A

practical guide (5th ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study

on technology in K–12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489–507.

Barron, B., Cayton-Hodges, G., Bofferding, L., Copple, C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Levine,

M. (2011). Take a giant step: A blueprint for teaching young children in a digital age. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop and Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t

happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding preservice teachers’ metacognit ive awareness of

instructional planning through pedagogical agents. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 5–22.

Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and

perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39(4), 395–414.

Beach, R. H., & Lindahl, R. A. (2000). New standards for the preparation of school

administrators: What conceptualization of educational planning do they portray? Planning and Changing, 31(1–2), 35–52.

Beach, R. H., & Lindahl, R. (2004). Identifying the knowledge base for school improvement.

Planning and Changing, 35, 2–32. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results

from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 1–59.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 3

Becker, H. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Children’s access to and use of computer

technology. The Future of Children, 10(2), 44–75. Bennett, L. (2000). Technology standards for the preparation of teachers. International

Journal of Social Education, 15(2), 1–11. Bennett, L. (2005). Guidelines for using technology in the social studies classroom. Social

Studies, 96(1), 38–44. Biehle, J. (2006). A five-step approach to planning for technology in new science spaces.

Science Scope, 30(1), 58. Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., Lochman, J. E., McMahon, R.

J., et al. (2002). The implementation of the Fast Track Program: An example of a large-scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(1), 1–17.

Bingimlas, K. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning

environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245.

Bitner, N., & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to

success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95–100. Bitter, G. G., & Lagacy, J. M. (2008). Using technology in the classroom (7th ed.). Boston:

Allyn & Bacon. Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., Rapp, C. A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A. F., et al.

(2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 52(3), 313–322.

Borkovec, T. D., Echemendia, R. J., Ragusea, S. A., & Ruiz, M. (2001). The Pennsylvania

Practice Research Network and future possibilities for clinically meaningful and scientifically rigorous psychotherapy effectiveness research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(2), 155–167.

Bory-Adams, A. (2006). UNESCO's role, vision and challenges for the UN Decade of

Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014). CONNECT: UNESCO International Science, Technology and Environmental Education Newsletter, 31(1/2), 1–5.

Boss, S. (Ed.) (2008). Technology integration: What experts say. Edutopia. Retrieved from

http://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-experts Bowman, D. (2004). Thinking through the technology puzzle. From Now On: The

Educational Technology Journal, 14(1). Retrieved from http://www.fno.org/oct04/integrating.html

Braat, C. J. (2010). Perceptions of two educational technology standards: A case study of

an Ohio urban K–12 school district. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(2–A), 536.

Brown, D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom:

Students’ experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599–621.

Brunello, P. (2010). ICT for education projects: A look from behind the scenes. Information

Technology for Development, 16(3), 232–239.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 4

Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2009). Leading staff development for school improvement. School

Leadership & Management, 29(1), 23–37. Buston, K., Wight, D., Hart, G., & Scott, S. (2002). Implementation of a teacher-delivered

sex education programme: Obstacles and facilitating factors. Health Education Research, 17(1), 59–72.

Buzhardt, J., Greenwood, C., Abbott, M., & Tapia, Y. (2006). Research on scaling up

evidence-based instructional practice: Developing a sensitive measure of the rate of implementation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(5), 467– 492.

Byrom, E., & Bingham, M. (2001). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for

teaching and learning: Lessons learned from SEIR*TEC intensive site schools (2nd ed.). Greensboro, NC: SERVE Center.

Callan, M. B. (2010). Sustained organizational learning for comprehensive school reform: A

sensemaking perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(7–A).

Campuzano, L., Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., & Rall, K. (2009). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Carr, T. (2011). An examination of leadership styles in implementing instructional

technology: A case study to examine the elementary school principal perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University [online institution].

Casey, H., & Rakes, G. (2002). An analysis of the influence of technology training on

teacher stages of concern regarding the use of instructional technology in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 124–132.

Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., & Martinez, C. R. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention

interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5(1), 41–45.

Cates, W., Price, B., & Bodzin, A. M. (2003). Implementing technology-rich curricular

materials: Findings from the Exploring Life Project. Computers in the Schools, 20(1/2), 153–169.

Cavanaugh, C. (2011). An evaluation of the conditions, processes, and consequences of

laptop computing in K–12 classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 359–378.

Chang, I.-H. (2012). The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’

technological literacy and teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328– 340.

Chang, I.-H., Chin, J. M., & Hsu, C.-M. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of the dimensions

and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 229–245.

Chapman, L., & Pedulla, J. (2010). Do digital divisions still persist in schools? Access to

technology and technical skills of teachers in high needs schools in the United States of America. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 239–249.

Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology

integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 5

Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Identifying and monitoring students’ learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 309–332.

Chen, I., & McPheeters, D. (Eds.). (2011). Cases on educational technology integration in

urban schools. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2011). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K–12 classrooms: A meta- analysis. Baltimore: Center for Research and Reform in Education.

Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications

affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215.

Chien, Y., Chang, C., Yeh, T., & Chang, K. (2012). Engaging pre-service science teachers

to act as active designers of technology integration: A MAGDAIRE framework. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28(4), 578–588.

Chinman, M., Hannah, G., Wandersman, A., Ebener, P., Hunter, S. B., Imm, P., et al.

(2005). Developing a community science research agenda for building community capacity for effective preventive interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3/4), 143–157.

Cole, K., & Simkins, M. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: Strategies for in-service

professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 431–455.

Collier, C. (2001). Staff development for technology integration in the classroom. In J.

Lebaron & C. Collier (Eds.), Technology in its place: Successful technology infusion in school (pp. 61–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Consortium for School Networking. (2009). Framework of essential skills of the K–12 chief

technology officer. Retrieved from http://www.cosn.org/Resources/CTOCouncil/EssentialSkillsoftheK12CTO/tabid/4489/Default.aspx

Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology

influence student learning? Learning & Leading With Technology, 29(8), 46–56. Crane, C. M. (2005). Teacher perceived impact of technology on elementary classrooms

and teaching. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Chrispeels, J. H., Castillo S., & Brown J. (2000). School leadership teams: A process

model of team development. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11, 20– 56.

Cudd, P. A., & Lane, J. P. (2012). The "Need to Knowledge" Model: An operational

framework for knowledge translation and technology transfer. Technology & Disability, 24(3), 182–192.

Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003). A retrospective on twenty years of education

technology policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.

Davies, P. M. (2010). On school educational technology leadership. Management in

Education, 24(2), 55–61.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 6

Davis, G. (2008). The development and field test of the education technology leadership assessment survey. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69, 04A.

Davis, J., Preston, C., & Sahin, I. (2009). ICT teacher training: Evidence for multilevel

evaluation from a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 135–148.

Davis, M. R. (2008). The knowledge gap. Education Week Digital Directions, 1(3), 15–17.

Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2008/01/23/3leadership.h01.html

Dawson, K. (2012). Using action research projects to examine teacher technology

integration practices. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 117– 124.

Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2008). Florida’s Leveraging Laptops

Initiative and its impact on teacher practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 143–159.

Dean, V., & Martineau, J. (2012). A state perspective on enhancing assessment and

accountability systems through systematic implementation of technology. In R. W. Lissitz & H. Jiao (Eds.), Computers and their impact on state assessments: Recent history and predictions for the future (pp. 55–77). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.

Dede, C. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum.

Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 281–303. Dede, C. (1998). Six challenges for educational technology. Fairfax, VA: George Mason

University. Retrieved from http://www.learningdomain.com/6_challenges.IT.pdf

Demir, S. (2011). Two inseparable facets of technology integration programs: Technology and theoretical framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 75–88.

Derringer, P. (2010). Making 1.1 work. Technology and Learning, 30(7), 28–34. Dexter, S. (2002). eTIPS: Educational technology integration and implementation principles.

Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Dexter, S. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of

School Leadership, 21, 166–189. Dexter, S., Doering, A. H., & Riedel, E. S. (2006). Content area specific technology

integration: A model for educating teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325–345.

Douglas, K. H., Wojcik, B. W., & Thompson, J. R. (2012). Is there an app for that? Journal

of Special Education, 27(2), 59–70. Dufour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school and

classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive

participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7–22.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 7

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.

Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., et al. (2007).

Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Eagle, K. A., Garson, A. J., Beller, G. A., & Sennett, C. (2003). Closing the gap between

science and practice: The need for professional leadership. Health Affairs, 22, 196–201.

Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology in public education.

EducationalTechnology Magazine, 42(1), 5–13. Edwards, R. W., Jumper-Thurman, P., Plested, B. A., Oetting, E. R., & Swanson, L. (2000).

Community readiness: Research to practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 291–307.

Edutech. (2007). Edutech responds. Edutech Report, 23(9), 8. Edutopia Staff. (2008). Why integrate technology into the curriculum? The reasons are

many. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-introduction

Eller, J. F., & Eller, S. A. (2011). Working with difficult and resistant staff. Bloomington, IN:

Solution Tree Press. Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective

prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5(1), 47–52. Elmore, R. (2011). I used to think and now I think : 20 leading educators reflect on the work

of school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Enochsson, A., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in initial teacher training: Research review (OECD

Education Working Paper 38). Paris, France: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for

technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(40), 47–61.

Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., & Wignall, E. (2003).

Increasing preservice teachers’ capacity for technology integration through use of electronic models. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95–112.

Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers:

Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33, 5.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How

knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 8

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423–435.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using

teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.

Escobar-Arcay, D. (2009). An analytical and descriptive assessment of Michael Fullan's

scholarship on educational change. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(1–A), 42.

Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school

system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669–686. Fatemi, E. (1999). Building the digital curriculum: Summary. Education Week, 19(4), 5.

Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20060930000728/counts.edweek.org/sreports/tc99/articles/summary.htm

Feldstein, A. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2008). A Practical, Robust Implementation and

Sustainability Model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety/Joint Commission Resources, 34, 228–243.

Feyerer, E., Miesenberger, K., & Wohlart, D. (2002). ICT and assistive technology in

teachers’ education and training. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2398, 107– 114.

Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating an

inventory for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.

Fixsen, D. L., Blasé, K. A., & Campbell, A. (2012). Implementation and public policy.

Colorado Implementation Initiative. Retrieved from http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-CII-ImplementationAndPublicPolicy-12-2012.pdf

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network & Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida.

Flaspohler, P., Stillman, L., Duffy, J. L., Wandersman, A., & Maras, M. (2008). Unpacking

capacity: The intersection of research to practice and community centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 171–181.

Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century

principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124–142. Frank, K., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Factors affecting technology users in schools: An ecological

perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. Frank, K., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations

within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 9

Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., Witt, E., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2011). Focus, fiddle, and friends: Experiences that transform knowledge for the implementation of innovations. Sociology of Education, 84, 137–156.

Franklin, C. A. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers' use of computers.

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 267–293. Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2008). Doing the right thing with technology. English Journal, 97(6),

38–42. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M.

(2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467–475.

Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their

organizations survive and thrive. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Fullan, M. (2009). Introduction. The challenge of change: Start school improvement now

(2nd ed., pp. 3–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Fullan, M. (2009). The challenge of change: Start school improvement now (2nd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Fullan, M. (2010). Motion leadership: The skinny on becoming change savvy. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fullan, M., Cuttress, C., & Kilcher, A. (2009). 8 forces for leaders of change. The challenge of change: Start school improvement now (2nd ed., pp. 9–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fullan, M., & Knight, J. (2011). Coaches as system leaders. Educational Leadership, 69(2), 50–53.

Fullan, M., & Sharratt, L. (2009). Sustaining leadership in complex times. The challenge of

change: Start school improvement now (2nd ed., pp. 157–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fuller, H. L. (2000). First teach their teachers: Technology support and computer use in

academic subjects. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 511– 537.

Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1–24.

Gooler, D., Kautzer, K., & Knuth, R. (2000). Teacher competence in using technologies:

The next big question. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of school based prevention

programs: Results from a national survey. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 39, 3–35.

Graczewski, C., Knudson, J., & Holtzman, D. (2009). Instructional leadership in practice:

What does it look like, and what influence does it have? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(1), 72–96.

Graves, A., & Klett, W. (2009). A mentoring model for inactive online learning in support of

a technology innovation challenge grant. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(1), 5–16.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 10

Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Educational technology in U.S. public schools:

Fall 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

Greaves, T., & Hayes, J. (2008). America's digital schools 2008: The six trends to watch. Retrieved from http://www.lcps.org/cms/lib4/VA01000195/Centricity/Domain/52/Americas_Digital_Schools_2008.pdf

Greaves, T., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, R. (2010). The technology

factor: Nine keys to student achievement and cost-effectiveness. Shelton, CT: MDR. Retrieved from http://www.schooldata.com/pdfs/ProjectRED_TheTechnolgyFactor_Intro.pdf

Grismore, B. A. (2012). Mini technology manual for schools: An introduction to technology

integration. Online ERIC Submission, 1–8. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533378.pdf

Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom

technology use. AACE Journal, 16(1), 21–46. Guha, M., Druin, A., Chipman, G., Fails, J., Simms, S., & Farber, A. (2005). Working with

young children as technology design partners. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 39–42.

Guhn, M. (2009). Insights from successful and unsuccessful implementations of school

reform programs. Journal of Educational Change, 10(4), 337–363. Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration

in schools. Computers & Education, 49, 943–956. Hager, M. J., & Clemmons, R. (2010). Faculty and IT: Conversations and collaboration.

EDUCAUSE Review, 45(2), 58–59. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes.

Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2010). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Heller, J. I., Curtis, D. A., Jaffe, R., & Verboncouer, C. J. (2005). Impact of handheld

graphing calculator use on student achievement in Algebra 1. Oakland, CA: Heller Research Associates.

Hernandez-Ramos, P. (2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers’ use of

technology in Silicon Valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64.

Herr, L., & Brooks, D. W. (2003). Developing and sustaining K–12 school technology

innovation through lottery grant awards: A multiple case study. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 12(2), 153–182.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning:

Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 11

Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–38.

Hiltz, J., & Dexter, S. (2012). Principal leadership and instructional technology support

networks. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 3361–3366). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/40107

Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital

divide in K–12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648–1663.

Honey, M., Kulp, K. M., & Carrigg, F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education

research: Lessons from the past and present. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5–14.

Houston, M. (2008). Notes from a centralized office. Technology & Learning, 28(6), 19–21. Hsu, P., & Sharma, P. (2008). A case study of enabling factors in the technology

integration change process. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 213–228. Hughes, J. (2009). The digital pencil: One-to-one computing for children. Literacy, 43(1),

61. Hur, J., Cullen, T., & Brush, T. (2010). Teaching for application: A model for assisting pre-

service teachers with technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 161–182.

Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K–12

classrooms: A path. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2009). National Educational

TechnologyStandards for Administrators (NETS-A). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-a-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Jackson, C. (2012). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system review.

Development in Education, 38(4), 689–690.

Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implementation of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173.

Johnson, G. (2012, March). Reframing technology narratives and routines to energize

organizational change. Presented at CUE 2012 meeting, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/maremel/reframing-technology-narratives-and-routines-to-energize-organizational-change

Jonassen, D., Howlad, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with

technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development.

Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Judge, S., & O'Bannon, B. (2007). Integrating technology into field-based experiences: A

model that fosters change. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 286–302.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 12

Kallestad, J. H., & Olweus, D. (2003). Predicting teachers’ and schools’ implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A multilevel study. Prevention & Treatment, 6, 3–21.

Karagiori, Y. (2005). Throwing light into the black box of implementation: ICT in Cyprus

elementary schools. Educational Media International, 42(1), 19–32. Ketternlin-Geller, L. R., & Tindal, G. (2007). Embedded technology: Current and future

practices for increasing accessibility for all students. Journal of Special Education, 22(4), 1–15

Kincaid, T., & Feldner, L. (2002). Leadership for technology integration: The role of

principals and mentors. Educational Technology and Society, 5, 1. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_1/kincaid.html

King, K. P. (2002). A journey of transformation: A model of educators’ learning experiences

in educational technology. Raleigh, NC: Adult and Community College Education, North Carolina State University.

King-Sears, M. E., & Evmenova, A. S. (2007). Premises, principles, and processes for

integrating TECHnology into instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 6– 14.

Kirkland, J., & Bilmer, D. (2007). Save us from e-nnihilation. Literacy Today, 51, 11. Kitchenham, A. (2006). Teachers and technology: A transformative journey. Journal of

Transformative Education, 4(3), 202–225. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). The instructional power of digital

games, social networking, simulations, and how teachers can leverage them. The Education Arcade, 1–20.

Kong, S. C. (2009). An empirical study of school-based planning for the use of information

technology to improve the quality of education in the twenty-first century. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 343–359. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14759390903255627

Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring

and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 175–190.

Kozma, R. (Ed.) (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global

perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal

of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. Krischner, P., & Davis, N. (2003). Pedagogical benchmarks for information and

communications technology in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 125–147.

Krueger, K. R. (2010). Finding and nurturing leadership. School Administrator, 67(7), 8. Krueger, K., Hansen, L., & Smaldino, S. (2000). Preservice teacher technology

competencies: A model for preparing teachers of tomorrow to use technology. TechTrends, 44(3), 47–50.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 13

LeBaron, J. (2001). Curriculum planning for technology-rich instruction. In J. Lebaron & C. Collier (Eds.), Technology in its place: Successful technology infusion in schools (pp. 17–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship

between technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 455–472.

Lesisko, L., Wright, R., & O'Hern, B. (2010, February). Technology integration: A best

practice perspective.Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Savannah, GA.

Lever-Duffy, J., & McDonald, J. B. (2010). Teaching and learning with technology

(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration

of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–262.

Levy, M. S. (2011). Migrant laptops: Extending the academic day for the children of farm

workers and their credit recovery via laptops. Computers in Schools, 28(2), 140– 157.

Li, S. C.(2010). Social capital, empowerment and educational change: A scenario of

permeation of one-to-one technology in school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 284–295.

Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and

conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.

Lim, J., & Freed, S. (2009). We have the videoconference equipment installed, now what?

Qualitative Report, 14(3), 433–453. Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Organizational functioning: Facilitating effective

interventions and increasing the odds of programming success. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 123–154). New York: Guilford Press.

Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Strahl, J. D., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration

“work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 189–206.

Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. (2009). School environment and technology implementation in K–

12 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 89–106. Ma, W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer

technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395.

MacArthur, C. A., & Haynes, J. B. (1995). Student Assistant for Learning from Text (SALT):

A hypermedia reading aid. Journal of Learning (SALT) Disabilities, 28(3), 150–159. MacDonald, M. A., & Green, L. W. (2001). Reconciling concept and context: The dilemma

of implementation in school-based health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 28(6), 729–768.

Maddux, C., & Johnson, L. (2006). Information technology: Type II classroom integration,

and the limited infrastructure in schools. Computers in the Schools, 22(3/4), 1–5.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 14

Martin, W., Culp, K., Gersick, A., & Nudell, H. (2003). Intel Teach to the Future: Lessons

learned from the evaluation of a large-scale technology integration professional development program. New York: EDC's Center for Children and Technology.

Martinez, S., & Harper, D. (2008). Working with tech-savvy kids. Educational Leadership,

66(3), 64–69. Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ̀ The Design Process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology

education. Journal of Technology & Design Education, 13(2), 117–128. McIntosh, K., Filter, K., Bennett, J., Ryan, C., & Sugai, G. (2010). Principles of sustainable

prevention: Designing scale-up school-wide positive behavior support to promote durable systems. Psychology in Schools, 47(1), 5–21.

McKenzie, J. (2004). Stuffing technology into the curriculum. From Now On: The

Educational Technology Journal, 13, 8. Retrieved from http://www.fno.org/jun04/stuffit.html

McMillan Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of

education technology policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279–307.

McPherson, S., Witzer, D., & Pierrell, E. (2006). Technology academies: A professional

development model for technology integration leaders. Learning and Leading With Technology, 33(5), 26–27, 29–31.

Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning.Journal

of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 285–307. Meeks, G. (2011). One-to-one student computing. School Planning & Management, 50(7),

51–53. Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The Quality Implementation

Framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3/4), 462–480.

Mills, L. B. (2005). Organizing for technology support. School Administrator, 62, 4. Mills, S. C., & Ragan, T. J. (2000). A tool for analyzing implementation fidelity of an

integrated learning system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 21–41.

Mitchell, R. (2011). Planning for instructional technology in the classroom. New Directions

for Community Colleges, 154, 45–52. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for

measuring classroom technology use. Learning & Leading with Technology, 24, 52–56.

Moersch, C. (1999). Levels of technology implementation: An inventory for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading With Technology, 26(8), 59–63.

Moody, K. (2011). Teacher perceptions of moving toward technology innovation: Does an

Enhancing Education Through Technology grant lead to innovation and change? Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(7–A), 2427.

Morgan, D., Humphries, S. A., & Goette, T. B. (2006). Integrating technology to achieve a

measurable level of learning. Communications of the IIMA, 6(2), 47–52.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 15

Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Integrating computer technology into the

classroom (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall. Morse, B. C. (2010). Virtual education in Rhode Island's K–12 public schools: Current

status and perceptions of administrators. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 71.

Mouza, C. (2002). Learning to teach with new technology: Implications for professional

development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 272–289. Muhammad, A., & Sharroky, H. (2012). The will to lead, the skill to teach: Transforming

schools at every level. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Naoom, S. F., Wallace, F., Blase, K. A., Haines, M., & Fixsen, D. L. (2004). Implementation

in the real world: Tak ing programs and practices to scale: Concept mapping report (pp. 1–3). Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network & Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida.

Nash, S. (2012). Using a framework to help understand school reform. AASA Journal of

Scholarship & Practice, 8(4), 28–40. National Education Association. (2008). Access, adequacy, and equity in education

technology.Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/files/existing/pdfs/NEA-Access,Adequacy,andEquityinEdTech.pdf

Newton, X. A., & Llosa, L. (2010). Toward a more nuanced approach to program

effectiveness assessment: Hierarchical linear models in K–12 program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 162–179.

November, A. (2010). Empowering students with technology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,

CA: Corwin Press. O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of

implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.

O'Dwyer, L., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Identifying teacher, school and district

characteristics associated with elementary teachers’ use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(48), 1–33.

Olsen, E. M., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2009). A pathway forward to school change: Leading

together and achieving goals. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 8(4), 380–410. Osher, D., & Hanley, T. V. (2001). Implementing the SED National Agenda: Promising

programs and policies for children and youth with emotional and behavioral problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 374–403.

Oubre, A. (2008). Technological leadership proficiency among school administrators in the

twenty-first century schools (21s) initiative. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 68.

Overbaugh, R., & Lu, R. (2008). The impact of a NCLB-EETT funded professional

development program on teacher self-efficacy and resultant implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 43–61.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 16

Palmer, G. (2004). The sixth grade steps up big with handhelds in Newport-Mesa. District Administration, 40, 18–20.

Peckham, V. (2001). Training: Brevard’s cornerstone of technology. Curriculum

Administrator, 37(1). Persichitte, K. A., Caffarella, E. P., & Ferguson-Pabst, D. (2003). A continuing journey

toward technology infusion within teacher preparation. TechTrends, 47(2), 12–14. Pettenati, M. C., Giuli, D., & Khaled, O. A. (2001). Information technology and staff

development: Issues and problems related to new skills and competence acquisition. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 153–169. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-78398469/information-technology-and-staff-development-issues

Recker, M. M., Walker, A. A., Giersch, S. S., Mao, X. X., Halioris, S. S., Palmer, B. B., et al.

(2007). A study of teachers' use of online learning resources to design classroom activities. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia, 13(2), 117–134.

Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks: Using the power of

connections to transform education. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology

discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(1), 44–50.

Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology

investment: A review of findings from research. San Francisco: WestEd. Ritz, J. M. (2009). A new generation of goals for technology education. Journal of

Technology Education, 20(2), 50–64. Robertson, W. J. (2003). Stepping out of the box: Rethinking the failure of ICT to transform

schools. Journal of Educational Change, 4, 323–344. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching

(5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Knudsen, J., et al.

(2007). Can a technology-enhanced curriculum improve student learning of important mathematics? (SimCalc Technical Report 1). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Ross, J. D., McGraw, T. M., & Burdette, K. J. (2001). Toward an effective use of

technology in education: A summary of research. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED462963)

Ruiling, L., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2009). School environment and technology

implementation in K–12 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 89–106. Russell, J. F. (2005). Evidence related to awareness, adoption, and implementation of the

standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Journal of Technology Studies, 31(1), 30–38.

Russell, M. M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher

technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 17

Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the Internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009) Leading 21st-centurysSchools: Harnessing technology

for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Schrum, L., Thompson, A., Sprague, D., Maddox, C., McAnear, A., Bell, L., et al. (2005).

Advancing the field: Considering acceptable evidence in educational technology research. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3/4), 202–209.

Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the

implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9, 4.

Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice.

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 171–182. Simpson, R. (2008). Visualizing technology integration: A model for meeting ISTE

educational-technology standards. Edutopia. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/ferryway-school-saugus-ironworks

Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of

technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.

Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Hindsight, understanding what we

got wrong, and changing directions. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322. Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2007). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-

evidence synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education.

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective beginning

reading programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education.

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2009). Effective programs for

struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education.

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2008). Effective programs in middle and high school

mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education.

Smaldino, S. E., Russell, J. D., Henich, R., & Molenda, M. (2008). Instructional technology

and media for learning (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Smiley, R. W. (2010). Characteristics of systems and leadership in K–12 public school

educational technology programs: Understanding data use, decision making, and contextual factors. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(3–A).

Smith, G. E., Throne, S., & International Society for Technology in Education. (2007).

Differentiating instruction with technology in K–5 classrooms. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Smorynski, H. W. (2012). Decision-making for sustainable change. Academic Leader,

28(1), 3–7.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 18

Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene, OR:

International Society for Technology in Education.

Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2001). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128–150.

Spitzer, D. R. (2003). Lessons learned: 20 keys to successful training and performance

improvement. Educational Technology, 43(1), 50–53. Stansbury, M. (2008). Schools need help with tech support. eSchool news. Retrieved from

http://www.eschoolnews.com/2008/01/09/schools-need-help-with-tech-support/ State Education Technology Directors Association (SETDA). (2012). Case studies.

Retrieved from http://www.setda.org/web/guest/casestudies2012 Steckelberg, A., Lan, L., Xiongyi, L., & Kozak, M. (2008). A rubric for self-assessment of

essential technology conditions in schools. Computers in Schools, 25(1/2), 81–89. Steelman, J., Vasu, E., & Foley, A. (2004). Evaluating technology integration: Putting all

the pieces together to meet the challenge of NCLB. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 1055–1060). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Stein, S. J., Ginns, I. S., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). Grappling with teaching design and

technology: A beginning teacher's experiences. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 141–157.

Stone, N. J. (2008). Human factors and education: Evolution and contributions. Human

Factors & Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 534–539. Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for

informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. Strudler, N. (2010). Perspectives on technology and educational change. Journal of

Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 221–229. Stuart, L. H., Mills, A. M., & Remus, U. (2009). School leaders, ICT competence and

championing innovations. Computers & Education, 53(3), 733–741. Sugar, W., & Kester, D. (2007). Lessons learned from IMPACTing technology integration

practices: Four IMPACT model case studies. Computers in the Schools, 24(1/2), 15–32.

Sun, J. (2000). Planning into practice: Resources for planning, implementing and

integrating instructional technology. Durham, NC: SouthEast and Islands Regional Technology in Education Consortium (SEIR*TEC).

Sweet, J., Rasher, S., Abromitis, B., & Johnson, E. (2004). Case studies of higher

performing, high technology schools: Final research report on schools with predominantly low-income, African-American, or Latino student populations. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

Takkunen, C. L. (2008). Learning to teach with technology: New teachers' perspectives on

using educational technology after participating in a PT3 grant initiative. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 19

Tan, S.-C. (2010, December). Technology leadership: Lessons from empirical research. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Conference, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/Ascilite%20conference%20proceedings%202010/Seng_chee_tan-concise.pdf

Terpstra, M. (2010). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge: Preservice

teachers' perceptions of how they learn to use educational technology in their teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 70(10). (UMI No. AAT3381410)

Thomas, M., Barab, S. A., & Tuzun, H. (2009). Developing critical implementations of

technology-rich innovations: A cross-case study of the implementation of Quest Atlantis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(2), 125–153.

Thompson, S., Clem, J., Bettion, W., Richter, K., Riegeluth, C., Doll, M., et al. (2006).

Experiences in systemic change. TechTrends, 50(2), 34–41. Trybus, M. A. (2011). Facing the challenge of change: Steps to becoming an effective

leader. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 77(3), 33–36. Tubin, D. (2006). Typology of ICT implementation and technology applications. Computers

in the Schools, 23(1/2), 85–98. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: Author. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning

powered by technology: National Educational Technology Plan 2010. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Technology.

Valcke, M., Rots, I., Verbeke, M., & van Braak, J. (2007). ICT teacher training: Evaluation

of the curriculum and training approach in Flanders. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 795–808.

Vendlinski, T. P., Morris, J., & Michels, C. (2008). The importance of intention and order:

Teaching for conceptual understanding using handheld technology. Goleta, CA: Texas Instruments.

Venezky, R. L. (2004). Technology in the classroom: Steps toward a new vision. Education,

Communication & Information, 4(1), 3–21. Vrasidas, C. (2003). The design, development, and implementation of LUDA Virtual High

School. Computers in the Schools, 20(3), 15–25. Wandersman, A., Chien, V., & Katz, J. (2012). Toward an evidence-based system for

innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: Tools, training, technical assistance and quality assurance/quality improvement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3/4),445–459.

Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A

results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 389–395.

Ware, A. (2009). Unlocking excellence with keys to quality: Align appropriate technologies

within your school’s strategic improvement plan. Learning and Leading With Technology, 36(8), 22–23.

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 20

Warschauer, M. D. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 305–332.

Wasonga, T. (2007). Using technology to enhance collaborative learning. International

Journal of Educational Management, 21, 585–592. Watts, C. D. (2010). Technology leadership, school climate, and technology integration: A

correlation study in K–12 public schools. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(8–A), 2842.

Waugh, R., & Godfrey, J. (1993). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the

implementation change. British Educational Research Journal, 19(5), 565–578. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology

and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.

Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. New York:

Teachers College Press. Wentland, D. (2011). Examining and testing Michael Fullan's eight elements of

sustainability. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(6–A), 1849.

Wentworth, N., Graham, C. R., & Tripp, T. (2008). Development of teaching and

technology integration: Focus on pedagogy. Computers in the Schools, 25(1/2), 64–80.

Wentworth, N., Waddoups, G. L., & Earle, R. (2004). Technology integration into a teacher

education program. Computers in the Schools, 21(1/2), 1–14. Wisdom, J. P., White, N., Goldsmith, K., Bielavitz, S., Rees, A., & Davis, C. (2007).

Systems limitations hamper integration of accessible information technology in Northwest U.S. K–12 schools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 222–232.

Wood, D. (2007). Teachers' learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new

infrastructure for the status quo? Teachers College Record, 109(3), 699–739. Woody, K. (2006). Designs for learning with new technologies. Peer Review, 8(4), 23–25. Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2003). How a technology professional development program fits into

teachers’ work life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 591–607. Yasemin, G. L. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology

integration in schools. Computers and Education, 49(4), 943–956. Zabala, J. S., & Carl, D. F. (2004). Introduction to the QIAT self-evaluation matrices. Topics

in Language Disorders, 24(1), 39–49. Zhao, Y. (2001). What do they know: A comprehensive portrait of exemplary technology

using teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(2), 24–36. Zhao, Y., & Bryant, F. L. (2006). Can teacher technology integration training alone lead to

high levels of technology integration? A qualitative look at teachers’ technology integration after state mandated technology training. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 53–62. Retrieved from http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume5/Zhao.pdf

References | Studies to Support the Technology Implementation Process 21

Zhao, Y., Byers, J. L., Puge, K., & Sheldon, S. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 481–515.

Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control-

theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–30. Zhao, Y., Frank, K. A., & Ellefson, N. C. (2006). Fostering meaningful teaching and

learning with technology: Characteristics of effective professional development efforts. In R. Floden & E. Ashburn (Eds.), Leadership for meaningful learning with technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

Zhao, Y., Lai, C., & Zhang, G. M. (2010). Curriculum, digital resources and delivery.

International Encyclopedia of Education, 3, 390–396. Zhao, Y., & Lei, J. (2009). New technology. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider & D. Plank (Eds.),

Handbook of Educational Policy Research (pp. 671–693). New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis).

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.