ricci flow and the unifomization of surfacesjp/gsac_jeremy.pdf · 2007-02-08 · • examples:...
TRANSCRIPT
Ricci Flow and the Unifomization of Surfaces
Jeremy Pecharich
Graduate Colloquium
February 6, 2007
1
What is a Surface?
• A surface is a closed (i.e. compact and boundaryless) 2-dimensional manifold.• Examples: Sphere, Torus, Connected Sum of Tori.
• A surface is determined uniquely by its genus, roughly how many "holes" are in the surface,and the orientation.
• From the genus ,g, we can de�ne an invariant called the Euler characteristic χ(M2) = 2−2g.
Ricci Flow 2
Foundations from Geometry
For a di�erentiable manifold, M , and a di�erentiable function α :(−ε, ε) → M such that α(0) = p ∈ M . The tangent vector to thecurve α at t = 0 is a function α′(0) : C∞(M) → R given by:
α′(0)f = d(f◦α)dt |t=0
• The set of all tangent vectors to M at a point p is called the tangent space of M at p denotedas TpM .
• TpM is a vector space such that dimTpM= dimM .
• We choose {„
∂
∂x1
«, · · · ,
„∂
∂xn
«} as an orthonormal basis for TpM . We will write ∂i as
∂∂xi
A Riemannian metric on a manifold M is a correspondence which asso-ciates to each point p of M an inner product <,> on TpM . The metricis Cr if the function g(X, Y ) : p 7→ gp(Xp, Yp) is of class Cr.
• Example 1: Rn is a Riemannian manifold with metric given by < ei, ej >= δij whereei = (0, · · · , 1, · · · , 0).
Ricci Flow 3
• Example 2: S2 ⊂ R3 is a Riemannian manifold with metric given by gij =
„1 0
0 sin θ
«.
This makes S2 a Riemannian manifold with the round metric.• Example 3: Let Hn = {(x1, · · · , xn) : xn > 0} with the metric gij =
δij
xn
, this makes Hn
into a Riemannian manifold known as hyperbolic space.
From the metric we can de�ne the covariant derivative ∇ ∂∂tY = (dY k
dt +Γk
ijxiY j)Xk where Γk
ij = 12g
kl(∂igjl + ∂jgil − ∂lgij).
• For Rn the metric is constant therefore Γkij ≡ 0 which implies that the covariant derivative
coincides with the usual derivative.
Ricci Flow 4
Curvature of a Surface
De�ne a map R(X, Y )Z : X(M) 7→ X(M) byR(X, Y )Z = ∇Y∇XZ − ∇X∇Y Z + ∇[X,Y ]Z. This is known as thecurvature of M .
• Equivalently, since [∂i, ∂j] = 0 we obtain R(∂i, ∂j)∂k = (∇∂j∇∂i
−∇∂i∇∂j
)∂k
• Set R(∂i, ∂j)∂k = Rlijk∂l and < R(∂i, ∂j)∂k, ∂l) >:= R(∂i, ∂j, ∂k, ∂l) = Rijkl
• One can show the following identities are true:. Rijkl = Rm
ijkgml, Rijkl = −Rjikl, Rijkl = −Rijlk, Rijkl = Rklij.. For a surface {1, 2} are the only possibilities for i, j, k, l therefore the only nonzero
term of the curvature tensor is R1212.
• If M = Rn we have R(X, Y )Z ≡ 0 therefore we can think of R as a way of measuring how
much M deviates from being Euclidean.• By the second statement we see that the curvature measures the non-commutativity of the
covariant derivative.
Ricci Flow 5
Di�erent Kinds of Curvature
De�ne the sectional curvature Kσ :=< R(u, v)v, u > where σ is a two-dimensional subspace of TpM and {u, v} is an orthonormal basis of σ.The scalar curvature is de�ned as R = gjkRi
ijk.
• On surfaces we have that Kσ =R
2. The scalar curvature completely characterizes the curva-
ture in dimension 2.• When the scalar curvature is positive at a point, the volume of a small ball about that point
has a smaller volume than a ball of the same radius in Euclidean space. If the scalar curvatureis negative point, then the volume of a small ball about that point has a larger volume thana ball of the same radius in Euclidean space. This means that balls in hyperbolic space growfaster than balls in Euclidean space.
Two metrics g and h on a surface M 2 are conformally related if theirexists a function, u, such that g = e2uh.
• For example, stereographic projection of a sphere onto the plane with a point at in�nity is aconformal map.
• The scalar curvatures of two conformal metrics are related by:Rg = e−2u(−2∆hu + Rh)
Ricci Flow 6
Geometry vs. Topology of a Surface
Gauss-Bonnett Theorem: 4πχ(M 2) =∫
M 2Rdµ.
• This formula tells us that the total curvature of a surface is invariant under topological changes.• The following is topologically S2 but is not round. The curvature has mixed sign but by the
Gauss-Bonnett formula we know the total curvature is 8π.
Ricci Flow 7
Ricci Flow on Surfaces
• De�ne r :=
„ZM2
Rdµ
«/
„ZM2
dµ
«and consider the following PDE, called the normal-
ized Ricci �ow, on (M2, g0) that varies the metric in time:
∂
∂tg = (r − R)g
g(0) = g0
• Under the normalized Ricci �ow on a surface we have:
∂
∂tR = ∆R + R(R− r) (1)
• This PDE depends on the Euler characteristic of the surface. Our goal is to show how thisworks with nonpositive Euler characteristic.
• Equation (1) is known as a reaction-di�usion equation.
Ricci Flow 8
Reaction-Di�usion Equations
• The Laplacian term denotes di�usion of R, if the RHS only contained the Laplacian, theequation would be a heat equation. If the equation only contained this term we would expectR to tend to a constant as t →∞.
• The quadratic term promotes concentration of R. If the equation contained only this term(1) would be an ODE and the solution would blow up in �nite time for any initial conditionsatisfying R(0) > max{r, 0}.
• How the scalar curvature evolves depends on which term dominates.
Ricci Flow 9
Uniformaization Theorem
Theorem 1. If (M 2, g0) is a closed Riemannian surface, there existsa unique solution g(t) of the normalized Ricci flow
∂
∂tg = (r −R)g (2)
g(0) = g0
The solution exists for all time. As t →∞ the metrics g(t) convergeuniformly in any Ck-norm to a smooth g∞ of constant curvature.
• This implies that any surface admits a canonical geometry. Moreover, it is a classi�cation ofsurfaces into three families- constant positive, zero, or negative curvature.
• The Ricci �ow still hasn't provided a complete proof of the Uniformization theorem for positiveEuler characteristic. R. Hamilton gives a proof but he uses the fact that S2\pt. is conformalto the plane hence requires Unifomization.
Ricci Flow 10
A Priori Bounds of the Curvature on Surfaces
For any solution (M 2, g(t)) of (2) on a compact surface, there exists aconstant C > 0 depending only on the initial metric such that:
• If r < 0 then:r − Cert ≤ R ≤ r + Cert
• If r = 0 then:−
C
1 + Ct≤ R ≤ C
Ricci Flow 11
Long-time Existence
Theorem 2. If (M 2, g0) is a closed Riemannian surface, a uniquesolution g(t) of (2) exists for all time and satisfies g(0) = g0.
Idea of the Proof: By Shi, bounds on the curvature imply a priori bounds on all its derivativesfor a short time. Short time existence results tell us that the lifetime of a maximal solution (M2, g(t))
is bounded below byc
maxMn
| R[g0] |g0. Long-time existence results then imply that the �ow cannot
be extended past T < ∞ only if
limt↗T
( supx∈Mn
| R(x, t) |) = ∞
The bounds on R imply that a unique solution exists for all time.
• (Uniform Equivalence) The solution, g(t), to (2) is uniformally equivalent to the initial metric.More precisely, there exists a constant C > 1 depending only on g(0) such that for as longas a solution exists,
1
Cg(0) ≤ g(t) ≤ Cg(0)
Ricci Flow 12
Convergence when χ(M) < 0
What do we know so far:
• By theorem 2 a solution g(t) exists for 0 < t < ∞.• The metrics g(t) are all uniformly equivalent.• There exists a constant C > 0 depending only on the initial metric, g0, such that R is
exponentially approaching its average in the sense that:| R− r |< Cert
What is really going on!!:
• We start with some arbitrary surface with more than one hole (i.e. genus greater than one.)and some arbitrary metric.
• We evolve the metric on the surface according to (2) with initial data g0.• We have already shown that under this evolution the metric is exponentially approaching a
metric with constant curvature r.• In some sense the evolution is making our surface canonical.
All that remains is to show that all derivatives of R are dying exponen-tially.
Ricci Flow 13
Estimates on Derivatives
Assume that (M 2, g(t)) is a solution of the normalized Ricci �ow withr < 0 then we obtain the following estimates on the derivatives of thecurvature after long and arduous computations.
• | ∇R |2≤ C1ert/2 with C1 > 0
• | ∇∇R |2≤ C2ert/2 with C2 > 0
• supx∈M2
| ∇kR(x, t) |2≤ Cke
rt/2 for each positive integer k and Ck < ∞ is a constant for
each k.
This completes the proof if χ(M) < 0.
Ricci Flow 14
Convergence when χ(M) = 0
The idea is the same as χ(M) < 0 but we can only get uniform con-vergence in any Ck norm to a smooth constant-curvature metric g∞ ast →∞.
• supx∈M2
| R(x, t) | tends to zero as t →∞.
• supx∈M2
| ∇kR(x, t) |2≤
Ck
(1 + t)k+2
This implies uniform convergence in any Ck norm to a metric of constantcurvature.
Ricci Flow 15
One Dimension Higher
Instead of three model geometries there are eight model geometries.
• Three geometries with constant sectional curvature. S3
. R3
. H3
• Two geometries with product metrics.. S2 × R. H
2 × R
• Three manifolds (M, g) where M is a simply connected Lie group with a left-invariant metric.. The Heisenberg group, strictly upper-triangular 3× 3 matrices
. R2 nR\{0} where the action of t ∈ R\{0} is given by the matrix:
„t 00 t−1
«.
. PSL(2,R).
Ricci Flow 16
Geometrization Conjecture
Conjecture 3. (Thurston) Let M be a closed, orientable, prime 3-manifold. Then there is an embedding of a disjoint union of 2-toriand Klein bottles
∐i T
2i ⊂ M such that every component of the
complement admits a locally homogeneous riemannian metric offinite volume.
• The manifold is prime if it can not be presented as a connected sum in a non-trivial way, wherethe trivial way is P = P#S3.
• One can formulate the above as a prime 3-manifold M has a decomposition along incompressibletori and Klein bottles into pieces whose interiors admit �nite volume locally homogeneousmetrics.
• A tori in a 3-manifold is said to be incompressible if its fundamental group injects into thefundamental group of the 3-manifold.
Ricci Flow 17
Geometrization Conjecture implies Poincare Conjecture
• Suppose we have a prime homotopy 3-sphere Σ that satis�es the conclusion of the Geometriza-tion Conjecture.
• Since π1(Σ) = {1}, Σ has no incompressible tori or incompressible Klein bottles, and hencethe decomposition of Σ must be trivial.
• Again since π1(Σ) is trivial the homogenous model for Σ must be compact• But the only compact homogeneous model space is S3, hence Σ is di�eomorphic is S3.
Ricci Flow 18
Perelman's Idea
Classify �nite time singularities that develop inside the manifold.
• Type 1: Components of the manifold whose metrics are shrinking down in a controlled manner.
• Type 2: A long thin tube di�eomorphic to S2 × (−ε, ε) or a long thin tube with a cap ofpositive curvature on the end.
Ricci Flow 19
Singularities
• Go to the singular time remove all regions of the �rst type and do the 'surgery' near the 'large'ends of the thin long tubes to cap them o� with standard metrics on the disk.
• The topological e�ect of these surgeries is to remove components which are known to satisfyThurston's Geometrization Conjecture and to do surgery on the other components implement-ing a connected sum decomposition.
• Then take the manifold after surgery as the initial condition for continuing the Ricci �ow.• Repeat this process producing a �ow with surgery de�ned for all positive time with only �nitely
many surgeries in any �nite time interval.• Perelman showed if the manifold has �nite fundamental group then the Ricci �ow with surgery
becomes extinct after �nite time and there is no need for any analysis as t 7→ ∞.
Ricci Flow 20
The End
Ricci Flow 21