san ysidro railroad yard improvement project€¦ · 7-day classification counts appendix e speed...
TRANSCRIPT
Traffic Impact Analysis
San Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project
Prepared by:Kimley-Horn and Associates401 B Street, Suite 600San Diego, CA 92101619-234-9411
Prepared for:SANDAG401 B Street, Suite 800San Diego, CA 92101619-699-1900
June 2010
KHA NO. 095596021
© Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1—1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 1—1ANALYSIS SCENARIOS .......................................................................................................................... 1—1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 2—1
TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTING .......................................................................................................... 2—1STUDY INTERSECTIONS......................................................................................................................... 2—1ANALYSIS PROCESS .............................................................................................................................. 2—2
Analysis Software .............................................................................................................................. 2—2Intersections ...................................................................................................................................... 2—2Roadway Segments ............................................................................................................................ 2—3
SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION ............................................................................................................ 2—4
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................................ 3—1
ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 3—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 3—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 3—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 3—1
4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................................ 4—1
TRIP GENERATION ................................................................................................................................ 4—1TRIP DISTRIBUTION .............................................................................................................................. 4—1TRIP ASSIGNMENT ................................................................................................................................ 4—1
5.0 NEAR TERM CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 5—1
ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 5—1CUMULATIVE PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................... 5—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 5—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 5—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 5—1
6.0 2030 HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS............................................................................................ 6—1
ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 6—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 6—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 6—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 6—1
7.0 OTHER ISSUES ................................................................................................................................ 7—1
SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION .............................................................................................. 7—1SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................. 7—1
8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 8—1
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION ANALYSES ............................................................................................... 8—1SUMMARY OF ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSES ..................................................................................... 8—1
i
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Regional Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................... 1—3Figure 1-2 Proposed Site Plan ............................................................................................................ 1—4Figure 3-1 Existing Intersection Geometrics ...................................................................................... 3—2Figure 3-2 Existing Roadway Geometrics .......................................................................................... 3—3Figure 3-3 Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ 3—4Figure 3-4 Existing ADT Volumes .................................................................................................... 3—5Figure 4-1 Peak-Hour Project Trip Distribution-Study Intersections ................................................... 4—3Figure 4-2 Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments ................................................................... 4—4Figure 4-3 Heavy Truck Trip Distribution .......................................................................................... 4—5Figure 4-4 Project Trip Assignment-Study Intersections .................................................................... 4—6Figure 4-5 Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments .................................................................. 4—7Figure 5-1 Near Term Baseline Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 5—2Figure 5-2 Near Term Baseline ADT volumes ................................................................................... 5—3Figure 5-3 Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................... 5—4Figure 5-4 Near Term with Project ADT volumes .............................................................................. 5—5Figure 6-1 Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .......................................................... 6—2Figure 6-2 Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes .............................................................................. 6—3Figure 6-3 Horizon Year with Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .................................................... 6—4Figure 6-4 Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes ......................................................................... 6—5Figure 7-1 Sight Distance Evaluation ................................................................................................. 7—2
ii
List of Tables
Table 2-1 Study Intersections............................................................................................................ 2—2Table 2-2 Level of Service (LOS) Criteria For Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections ................. 2—3Table 2-3 City of San Diego Roadway Segment Capacity and Level of Service ................................ 2—4Table 2-4 Levels of Significance Criteria for Intersections and Roadway Segments .......................... 2—5Table 3-1 Existing Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary .............................................. 3—6Table 3-2 Existing Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ..................................................... 3—7Table 4-1 Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................................. 4—2Table 5-1 Near Term Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary .......................................... 5—6Table 5-2 Near Term Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ................................................. 5—7Table 6-1 Horizon Year Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary ...................................... 6—6Table 6-2 Horizon Year Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ............................................. 6—7Table 8-1 Summary of Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Results ............................................................. 8—2Table 8-2 Summary of Roadway Segment LOS Results .................................................................... 8—3
List of Appendices
Appendix AExisting Traffic Volumes Data
Appendix BPeak-Hour Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
Appendix CSANDAG 2030 Forecast Plot
Appendix D7-Day Classification Counts
Appendix ESpeed Data Counts
Traffic Impact Analysis Executive SummarySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project June 2010
Executive SummaryThis study, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., evaluates the potential off site traffic-relatedimpacts associated with the proposed improvements to the San Ysidro Rail Yard. The purpose of theproject is to improve operation capacity and efficiency at the Rail Yard to accommodate existing andfuture freight rail operations in the region. The project will include the construction of two new trackextensions to the north that would provide additional storage capacity, as well as the ability to switch railcars outside of the constrained operating windows without interrupting the trolley line. A majority of thecapacity increase within the yard is intended for throughput operations; however as part of the project, thenumber of locations which can be used as docking/unloading spots will increase from 3 spots toapproximately 15 spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow for an increase of trucktraffic coming to the yard to load and unload products.
The existing site has access at the driveway located along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard; justeast of Bolton Hall Road. As part of the improvements, a new exit only driveway will be constructedalong the east side of East Beyer Boulevard parallel to the railroad track. The existing driveway will beconverted to an entrance only driveway.
The proposed project was not found to have any off site transportation related impacts at any of theintersections and roadway segments within the study area.
Traffic Impact Analysis IntroductionSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 1—1 June 2010
1.0 INTRODUCTIONThe following traffic study has been prepared to determine and evaluate the potential off site trafficimpacts associated with the proposed improvements to the San Ysidro Rail Yard. Figure 1-1 depicts thelocation of the project site in a regional context.
Project Description
The purpose of the project is to improve operational capacity and efficiency at the Rail Yard toaccommodate existing and future freight rail operations in the region. The project will include theconstruction of two new track extensions to the north that would provide additional storage capacity, aswell as the ability to switch rail cars outside of the constrained operating windows without interruptingthe trolley line. A majority of the capacity increase within the yard is intended for throughput operations;however as part of the project, the number of locations which can be used as docking/unloading spots willincrease from 3 spots to approximately 15 spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow foran increase of truck traffic coming to the yard to load and unload products. Based on the nature of theproducts being unloaded from the rail cars, the additional 12 spots will allow for between 3 to 4 trucktrips per rail car, and typical unloading patterns will result in an average of 1 to 2 days for unloading percar. Based on the expected unloading rates, the typical daily additional truck trips expected as a result ofthis project will be up to 28 truck trips per day (See calculation below).
Number of additional spots available = 12Average number of truck per rail car = 3.5Average unloading rate = 1.5 days
Average number of additional new daily truck trips: (12 x 3.5) / 1.5 = 28
The existing site has access at the driveway located along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard just eastof Bolton Hall Road. As part of the improvements, a new exit only driveway will be constructed alongthe east side of East Beyer Boulevard parallel to the railroad track. The existing driveway will beconverted to an entrance only driveway. Figure 1-2 shows the proposed site plan for the project.
Analysis Scenarios
A total of five scenarios were analyzed as part of the project, which are listed below:
Existing Conditions (2009)Existing Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the existing street network.
Near Term Conditions (2010)Near Term Baseline Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the street network assumedto be in place in the near term and is used to establish a near term, without project baseline forcomparison.Near Term with Project Conditions: Represents the near term traffic conditions with the additionof the proposed project.
Horizon Year Conditions (2030)
Traffic Impact Analysis IntroductionSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 1—2 June 2010
Horizon Year Baseline Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the street networkassumed to be in place under Horizon Year conditions. The Horizon Year is consistent with theCity’s General Plan and is used to establish a long-term, without project baseline for comparison.Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions: Represents the Horizon Year traffic conditions with theaddition of the proposed project.
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 1-1 Regional Vicinity Map
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\vicinity map south sd.ai
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
805
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
8
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
5
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
15
905
163
54
52
94
125
67
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
5
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
805
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
125
Project Site
Imperial Beach
Coronado
San Diego
El Cajon
Lemon Grove
National City
Chula Vista
La Mesa
Santee
United States
Mexico
1-3
E BEYER BLVD
E B
EY
ER
BLV
D
E S
AN
YS
IDR
O B
LVD
BLU
EBA
RN
INTERNATIO
NAL
BOUNDARY
MA
IN T
RAC
K
San
Ysi
dro
Rai
lro
ad Y
ard
Imp
rove
men
t Pr
oje
ct
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\0
9559
6020
\San
Ysi
dro
Yard
Tra
ffic
Stu
dy\Il
lust
rato
r\Site
Pla
n.ai
FIG
UR
E 1
-2S
ite P
lan
Not
to S
caleN
ew E
xit D
wy
Exi
stin
g D
wy
1-4
Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—1 June 2010
2.0 METHODOLOGYThe following section describes the methodology used in the process of forecasting model data,determination of study intersections, analysis process, and determination of significant impacts.
Traffic Volume Forecasting
Traffic volumes for the Near Term condition were estimated by adding the traffic related to all thepending/approved cumulative projects to the existing traffic volumes.
The Horizon Year Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on the roadway segments in the study area weredetermined from SANDAG’s 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (Mobility 2030) and the Final 2030Regional Growth Forecast.
To estimate the Horizon Year turning movement volumes at the study intersections, the existing turningmovements at each respective study intersection were factored up based on the projected ADT volumesalong each approach. Each respective movement would be derived using an iterative approach thatbalances the inflows and outflows for each approach. The input values include the existing turningmovement volumes and future year peak hour approach and departure volumes along each leg of theintersection. The future peak hour approach volumes would be estimated by applying the existing peak-hour factor (K-factor) and directional distributional percentage (D-factor) to the future ADT volumesalong each approach. A more detailed description of the methodology used to forecast turning movementvolumes is contained in NCHRP 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning andDesign, Chapter 8. An Excel model computes the forecast turning volumes from existing turningmovement volumes and forecasted approach and departure volumes by the techniques described inNCHRP 255. As a conservative approach, if a turning movement volume produced by this model wasless than the existing count for that movement, manual adjustments were made to assure that all forecasthorizon year volumes would be equal or greater than the existing turning movement counts.
Study Intersections
The study area was defined based on likely project traffic patterns and procedures summarized in the Cityof San Diego’s Traffic Impact Study Manual, July 1998. The following intersections shown in Table 2-1,which represent primary ingress/egress to and from the project site and the surrounding community, wereidentified for evaluation.
As shown in Table 2-1, with the exception of the I-805 ramps along East San Ysidro Boulevard, allintersection are unsignalized. The two I-805 ramps along East San Ysidro Boulevard are signalizedintersections. All study intersections are located within the City of San Diego’s limits.
Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—2 June 2010
Table 2-1 Study Intersections
TABLE 2-1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS
Intersection Traffic Control (a)
1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd OWSC
2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St- Center St AWSC
3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Road OWSC
4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy OWSC
5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St OWSC
6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-80 NB Ramp Signal
7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-80 SB Ramp Signal
Notes:(a) Signal = Traffic signal, OWSC=One –Way Stopped Control; AWSC= All-Way Stop Control
Analysis Process
The analysis process includes determining the operations at the study intersections for the a.m. and p.m.peak-hours and operations along the roadway segments by using ADT volumes. Intersections will bemeasured and quantified by using the Synchro traffic analysis software package. Results will becompared to the City’s standards and determined if the project has any significant impacts.
Analysis Software
To analyze the operations of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, Synchro 6.0 (Trafficware)was used for the analysis. Synchro 6.0 uses the methodologies outlined in the 2000 Highway CapacityManual (HCM).
The existing intersection peak-hour factor (PHF) was used for all scenarios.
Intersections
The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board establishesa system whereby highway facilities are rated for their ability to process traffic volumes. Theterminology "level of service" is used to provide a "qualitative" evaluation based on certain "quantitative"calculations, which are related to empirical values.
Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—3 June 2010
Level of service (LOS) for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure ofdriver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and loss of travel time. Specifically, LOS criteria arestated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle for the peak 15-minute period within the houranalyzed. The average control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, and finalacceleration time in additional to the stop delay. The level of service for unsignalized intersections isdetermined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Thecriteria for the various levels of service designations for signalized and unsignalized intersections aregiven in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Level of Service (LOS) Criteria For Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections
TABLE 2-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LOS
Signalized(Control Delay
(sec/veh))(a)
Unsignalized(Average control
delay(sec/veh))(b) Description
A <10.0 <10.0 Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop.
B >10.0 and <20.0 >10.0 and <15.0 Operations with good progression but with some restricted movement.
C >20.0 and <35.0 >15.0 and <25.0 Operations where a significant number of vehicles are stopping withsome backup and light congestion.
D >35.0 and <55.0 >25.0 and <35.0 Operations where congestion is noticeable, longer delays occur, andmany vehicles stop. The proportion of vehicles not stopping declines
E >55.0 and <80.0 >35.0 and <50.0 Operations where there is significant delay, extensive queuing, and poorprogression.
F >80.0 >50.0 Operations that are unacceptable to most drivers, when the arrival ratesexceed the capacity of the intersection.
Source:(a) 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 16, Page 2, Exhibit 16-2(b) 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 17, Page 2, Exhibit 17-2
Within the City of San Diego, all signalized and unsignalized intersections are expected to operate at LOSD or better.
Roadway Segments
In order to determine the impacts on the study area roadway segments, Table 2-3 has been developed bythe City of San Diego and is used as a reference. The segment traffic volumes under LOS E as shown inthis table are considered at capacity because at LOS E the v/c Ratio is equal to 1.0.
Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—4 June 2010
Table 2-3 City of San Diego Roadway Segment Capacity and Level of Service
TABLE 2-3 CITY OF SAN DIEGO ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
Road Level of Service (LOS)Class Lanes A B C D E
Freeway 8 60,000 84,000 120,000 140,000 150,000
Freeway 6 45,000 63,000 90,000 110,000 120,000
Freeway 4 30,000 42,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
Expressway 6 30,000 42,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
Prime Arterial 6 25,000 35,000 50,000 55,000 60,000
Major Arterial 6 20,000 28,000 40,000 45,000 50,000
Major Arterial 4 15,000 21,000 30,000 35,000 40,000
Collector 4 10,000 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Collector (No center lane)(Continuous left-turn lane)
42 5,000 7,000 10,000 13,000 15,000
Collector(No fronting property) 2 4,000 5,500 7,500 9,000 10,000
Collector(Commercial/Industrial fronting) 2 2,500 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000
Collector(Multi-family) 2 2,500 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000
Sub-Collector(Single family) 2 --- --- 2,200 --- ---
Notes:The volumes and the average daily level of service listed above are only intended as a general planning guideline.Levels of service are not applied to residential streets since their primary purpose is to serve abutting lots, not carry through traffic. Levels of servicenormally apply to roads carrying through traffic between major trip generators and attractors.
Source: City of San Diego Traffic Impact Study Manual, Table 2, Page 8, July 1998.
Significance Determination
To determine the project impacts to roadway segments and intersections, the City of San Diego hasdeveloped thresholds based on allowable increases in delay at intersections and volume to capacity (v/c)ratios for roadway segments. At intersections, the Measurement of Effectiveness (MOE) is based onallowable increases in delay. At roadway segments, the MOE is based on allowable increases in the v/cratio. At intersections that are expected to operate at LOS E with the project, the allowable increase in delayis two seconds, while for intersections that are expected to operate at LOS F, the allowable increase in delay
Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—5 June 2010
is one second. If vehicle trips from a project cause the delay at an intersection to increase by more than theCity’s threshold, this would be considered a significant project impact that requires mitigation. Under thiscondition, the applicant would be responsible for mitigation to restore the operations of the intersection toLOS D or better. If an existing intersection is operating at LOS E or F, the intersection would be consideredan existing deficiency. Two classes of impacts are measured for significance: Direct Impacts andCumulative Impacts. Direct traffic impacts are those projected to occur at the time a proposed developmentbecomes operational, including other developments not presently operational but which is anticipated to beoperational at that time (Near Term). Cumulative traffic impacts are those projected to occur at some pointafter a proposed development becomes operational, such as during subsequent phases of a project and whenadditional proposed developments in the area become operational (short-term cumulative) or when theaffected community plan area reaches full planned build out (long-term cumulative). The project applicantwould be responsible for mitigating direct impacts by improving the intersection operation to better thanpre-project conditions and identifying the improvements needed to bring the intersection to LOS D or betteroperation. A fair share contribution toward intersection improvements to achieve a LOS D or better couldbe necessary to mitigate cumulative impacts. A fair share contribution is based on the project’sproportionate traffic contribution to the overall traffic volumes entering an intersection.
For roadway segments that are forecasted to operate at LOS E, the allowable increase in v/c ratio is 0.02,while for roadway segments that are forecasted to operate at LOS F, the allowable increase in v/c ratio is0.01. An increase in v/c ratio higher than the City’s thresholds would be considered a significant impact thatrequires mitigation.
In certain instances mitigation may not be required if the roadway segment operates at LOS E or LOS F. Insuch cases the following three conditions must all be met:
1. The roadway is built to its ultimate classification per the community plan;
2. The intersections on both ends of the failing segment operate at an acceptable LOS; and
3. An HCM arterial analysis indicates an acceptable LOS on the segment.
Table 2-4 shows the criteria for determining levels of significance at intersections and roadway segments.Table 2-4 Levels of Significance Criteria for Intersections and Roadway Segments
TABLE 2-4LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA FOR INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS
Facility Measurement of Effectiveness (MOE) Significance Threshold (a)
Intersection Seconds of delay> 2.0 seconds at LOS E or
> 1.0 seconds at LOS F
Roadway Segment v/c Ratio > 0.02 at LOS E or > 0.01 at LOS F, and adjacentintersections operating at an unacceptable LOS
Notes:Source: City of San Diego Traffic Impact Study Manual, Table 5, July 1998 and California Environmental Quality Act-SignificanceDetermination Thresholds-Development Service Department, January 2007.(a) Significance threshold applies only when the type of facility operates at LOS E or F.
Traffic Impact Analysis Existing ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 3—1 June 2010
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONSThis section summarizes the existing roadway circulation network, daily and peak-hour traffic volumes, andoperations at the study intersections and roadway segments.
Road Network
The following provides a description of the existing street system within the vicinity of the project area.
East Beyer Boulevard is classified as a 2-lane collector that has a north-south alignment from BeyerBoulevard to East San Ysidro Boulevard. This street is located east of I-805 and I-5 and runs parallel to bothof these facilities. Bike lanes and parking are available on both sides of the street for most of the roadwaysegment. The east side of the street has a curb and gutter. The posted speed limit varies between 35 and 40mph.
East San Ysidro Boulevard is the primary thoroughfare in the San Ysidro community. Within this projectstudy area, East San Ysidro Boulevard is classified as a 4-lane collector from the I-805 Ramps to Center Street.Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and parking exist. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
Center Street is a north-south connector between East Beyer Boulevard and East San Ysidro Boulevard. Thisroadway is classified as a 2-lane collector. Parking is allowed along both sides of the street.
Figure 3-1 and 3-2 shows the existing geometrics and functional classification of the study intersections andthe roadway segments within the study area, respectively.
Traffic Volumes
Existing a.m. (7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) peak-hour turning movement counts wereconducted by True Counts at all intersections within the study area with the exception of the I-805 ramps alongEast San Ysidro Boulevard. The turning movement counts at the I-805 ramps and East San Ysidro Boulevardwere provided by National Data & Surveying Services. In addition to the peak-hour turning movement counts,24-hour roadway machine counts were conducted along the roadway segments in the study area. NationalData & Surveying Services conducted roadway segment count along East San Ysidro Boulevard while TrueCounts conducted roadway segment counts along all other roadway segments within the study area.
Figure 3-3 illustrates the existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections and Figure 3-4illustrates the existing ADT volumes along the roadway segments.
Appendix A contains the existing peak-hour traffic volume data at the study intersections and the existingADT volume data for the roadway segments.
Intersection Analysis
Table 3-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under Existing Conditions. As shownin the table, all study intersections operate at LOS C during both peak periods.
Appendix B contains the peak-hour intersections LOS calculation worksheets.
Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 3-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under Existing Conditions. As shown in the table, all studyroadway segments operate at LOS C or better under existing conditions.
NOT TO SCALE
N
FIGURE 3-1 Existing Intersection Geometrics
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\Intersection Geometrics.ai
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement
study int
Street
Street name
Freeway
Ramp
E St
ProjectSite
ProposedExit Only Dwy
Existing Dwy
Camino de la
Pla
za
E. Beyer Blvd
Bolton
Cent
er
St
Hill St
E. San Ysidro Blvd
Border Village Rd
Hall Rd
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
805
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
5
1
2
3
4
56
7
Legend:
ProposedExisting
Unsignalized
SignalizedX
X
1
2
3
4
5
I-805 SB Ramp/E. San Ysidro Blvd
7
I-805 NB Ramp/E. San Ysidro Blvd
6
Center St/E. San Ysidro Blvd
Existing Dwy/E. Beyer Blvd
Bolton Hall Rd/E. Beyer Blvd
Hill St - Center St/E. Beyer Blvd
E. Beyer Blvd/Proposed New Dwy
1 2 3 4
5
STO
P
STOP
STO
P
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
3-2
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
2-C
2-C
4-C
2-C
2-C
Legend2-C = 2 Lane Collector4-C = 4 Lane Collector
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Existing Roadway Geometrics
3—3
FIGURE 3-2
Existing Roadway Geometrics
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
0
E. Beyer Blvd
7
9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0
00
0000
00
073
0 0
0
6127
E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
0 0
3
43
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
0
457
45
0 1
51
211 0
20
00
0 0
00
0
287
I-805
SB
Ram
p7
0
318
46 70 226 262 0 0411610 926
00 0
0%
0 0 00 0
365
11 0
390 927
24
0 136
0
74
0E. San Ysidro Blvd
5
00 0
0 0 0
39 107
0
78 0 0 0
6
Cen
ter S
t
76 0 0
0237 452
373
191
0
0 0
5 5
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0%
0 0
4
24 74
0
5 0 0
5 00
10 72 0
0 Proposed New Dwy
2
22
3
00 36
0 126
00 0
00
0
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
175
0
360
028
00
00
90 0 0 3 1 2
0
0
22
3 8 4
2 0
54 58
0 00
63 5
Cen
ter S
t1130 4
17
0
656
30
110
311
0 0
0 0 0
00 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0
0 0
0
0 00 0
0
0 00
0
0
00 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 00
0
0 0
0 0000
00
0 00
0 0
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
0
109
I-805
NB
Ram
p
23 00
8
0 00
0
0
48 4 12
0 0
203
0 0
434
0
00
0 0
0 000 0 00 0
0
200
00 0 187
575118
0 0
0
0
00
0 0
0
0 00
0 00
0
Legend
FIGURE 3-3
Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Ex Figure 1-12
3—4 Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
4,166
4,208
13,348
4,208
1,300
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Existing ADT Volumes
3—5
FIGURE 3-4
Existing ADT Volumes
EXISTINGINTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b)
AMPMAM 7.6 APM 8.4 AAM 8.9 APM 10.1 BAM 8.5 APM 8.7 AAM 10.4 BPM 14.0 BAM 17.5 BPM 20.6 CAM 14.9 BPM 18.1 B
Notes:
(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Existing
(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At a two-way stop-controlled intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.
All-Way Stop
One-Way Stop
One-Way Stop
One-Way Stop
Actuated-UncoordinatedSignal
Actuated-UncoordinatedSignal
1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd
2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St
TABLE 3-1EXISTING CONDITIONS
PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY
PEAK HOURTRAFFIC CONTROL
One-Way Stop This intersection does not exist under this scenario
5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St
6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp
3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd
4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy
7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp
3—6
ROADWAY SEGMENT ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION (a)LOS E
CAPACITY ADT (b)V/C
RATIO (c) LOS
E. Beyer BlvdProposed Dwy to Center St 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,166 0.521 CCenter St to Bolton Hall Rd 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,208 0.526 CBolton Hall Rd to Existing Dwy 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,208 0.526 CCenter StE.San Ysidro Blvd to E. Beyer Blvd 2 Lane Collector 8,000 1,300 0.163 AE. San Ysidro BlvdI-805 to Center St 4 Lane Collector 30,000 13,348 0.445 BNotes:(a) Existing roads street classification is based on field observations and City of San Diego's roadway classifications.
(c) The v/c Ratio is calculated by dividing the ADT volume by each respective roadway segment's capacity.
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]Existing
TABLE 3-2
ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARYEXISTING CONDITIONS
(b) Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for the roadway segments along E.Beyer Blvd. were provided by True Counts and measured in July 14, 2009. The ADT along Center St. wasestimated based on turning movement counts also collected by True Count in July 2009. The ADT counts along E. San Ysidro Blvd were provided by National Data Services and countedin May 2007.
3-7
Traffic Impact Analysis Project TrafficSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 4—1 June 2010
4.0 PROJECT TRAFFICThe following section describes the trip generation, distribution and assignment related to the proposedSan Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvements project.
Trip Generation
In order to determine the traffic generation characteristics of the site, seven day machine counts werecollected at the site’s existing driveway. A copy of the 7-day classification counts can be found inAppendix D. The average weekday total daily trip generation was then calculated, in addition to thepeak-hour percentage of the daily and in/out ratios. The traffic counts indicated that the site currentlygenerates an average of 42 daily vehicular trips (21 total vehicles). Half of the vehicular trips arepassenger cars, one third of the trips are heavy trucks and the remaining are small trucks trips. Themorning and afternoon peak-hour generation rates of the site are equal to approximately 14.3 percent ofthe total daily trip generation. The in and out ratios are equal to 50 percent for both the morning andafternoon peak-hour periods. A passenger car equivalent was applied to the small and heavy trucks forthe purpose of the analysis. Table 4-1 summarizes the trip generation for existing site. As shown inTable 4-1, with the passenger car equivalent adjustment the site currently generates a total of 67passenger vehicles daily trips, including 10 (5 in, 5 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 10 (5 in, 5 out) p.m.peak-hour trips. The project will include the construction of two new track extensions to the north thatwould provide additional storage capacity, as well as the ability to switch rail cars outside of theconstrained operating windows without interrupting the trolley line. A majority of the capacity increasewithin the yard is intended for throughput operations; however as part of the project, the number oflocations which can be used as docking/unloading spots will increase from 3 spots to approximately 15spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow for an increase of truck traffic coming to theyard to load and unload products. Based on the nature of the products being unloaded from the rail cars,the additional 12 spots will allow for between 3 to 4 truck trips per rail car, and typical unloading patternswill result in an average of 1 to 2 days for unloading per car. Based on the expected unloading rates, thetypical daily additional truck trips expected as a result of this project will be up to 28 truck trips per day.As shown in Table 4-1, with the increase of heavy truck frequency, the total trip generation for the sitewill be equal to 137 passenger cars daily trips, including 20 (10 in, 10 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 20(10 in, 10 out) p.m. peak-hour trips. The net traffic generation of the project is equal to 70 passenger cardaily trips, including 10 (5 in, 5 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 10 (5 in, 5 out) p.m. peak-hour trips.
Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution for the project is based on the locations of the site’s access points, existing travelpatterns and access to freeway locations. Figures 4-1 and 4-2 display the project assumed distributionsthrough the study intersections and roadway segments during the morning and afternoon peak-hourperiods, respectively. It should be noted that all truck traffic originates at the Otay Border Crossing.Trucks will use Interstate 805 to travel from the Otay to the San Ysidro Area. They will exit at the EastSan Ysidro interchange and use Center Street to access the site via East Beyer Boulevard. Figure 4-3shows the anticipated truck route with the modification of the access point to the site.
Trip Assignment
Based on the project trip distributions, daily, a.m. and p.m. peak-hour project trips were assigned to thelocal roadway network and through the study intersections. Figure 4-4 shows the project trip assignmentat the study intersections and Figure 4-5 shows the project trip assignment along the roadway segments.
Lan
d U
seD
aily
Tri
ps1
Perc
ent o
fve
hicl
es1
Num
ber
ofT
ruck
sPa
ssen
ger
Car
Equ
ival
ent (
PCE
)A
M %
of
Tot
al1
In:O
ut R
atio
InO
utT
otal
PM %
of
Tot
al1
In:O
ut R
atio
InO
utT
otal
Prop
osed
Truc
k D
istrib
utio
n Fa
cilit
y70
Pass
enge
r Car
s21
30.0
%1.
021
Truc
k - T
otal
49
Smal
l Tru
ck10
.0%
71.
511
Larg
e Tr
ucks
60.0
%42
2.5
105
Subt
otal
7013
7
Prop
osed
Tot
al70
137
14.3
0%0.
50:
0.50
1010
2014
.30%
0.50
:0.
5010
1020
Exi
stin
g
Truc
k D
istrib
utio
n Fa
cilit
y42
Pass
enge
r Car
s21
50.0
%1.
021
Truc
k - T
otal
21
Smal
l Tru
ck16
.7%
71.
511
Larg
e Tr
ucks
33.3
%14
2.5
35
Subt
otal
4267
Exi
stin
g T
otal
4267
14.3
0%0.
50:
0.50
55
1014
.30%
0.50
:0.
505
510
NE
T IN
CR
EA
SE (P
RO
POSE
D M
INU
S E
XIS
TIN
G, T
OT
AL
) =70
55
105
510
Not
e:
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\09
5596
020\
San
Ysi
dro
Yar
d Tr
affic
Stu
dy\E
xcel
\[526
021T
G01
.xls
m]T
ruck
s by
Axl
e
1. T
he to
tal d
aily
trip
s, ve
hicl
e cl
assi
ficat
ion
and
peak
-hou
r trip
gen
erat
ion
rate
s wer
e ba
sed
on ro
adw
ay m
achi
ne c
ount
s pla
ced
at th
e ex
istin
g si
te's
entra
nce
durin
g a
perio
d of
seve
n co
nsec
utiv
e da
ys.
The
coun
ts w
ere
take
n in
July
200
9.
PM P
eak-
Hou
r
TABL
E 4-
1 T
RIP
GE
NE
RA
TIO
N S
UM
MA
RY
Hea
vy V
ehic
le A
djus
tmen
t
Tot
al w
ithA
djus
tmen
t
AM
Pea
k-H
our
4-2
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0%
(0%) 0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%
0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%
(0%) 0%
(0%
)(0
%)
(0%
) (0%)
(0%
)(0
%) (0%) 0%
(0%
)(0
%)
0% 0% 0%
(0%
)(0
%)
(0%
) (0%) 0%
(0%
)
0% 0% 0% 0%(0
%)
9 10 11 12
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%
0% 100%
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0%
I-805
SB
Ram
p 0% 0%0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0% 0%
0% 100% 0% 0%0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0%
(0%) 0%E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%
0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%
(0%) 0%
(0%
)(0
%)
(0%
) (0%)
(0%
)(0
%) (100%) 0%
(0%
)(0
%)
0% 0% 0%
(100
%)
(0%
)(0
%) (0%) 0%
(0%
)
0%
I-805
NB
Ram
p
0% 0% (0%
)
I-805
SB
Ram
p
100%
5 6 7 8
0% 0% 0%
Cen
ter S
t 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%0% 0%
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd 0% 100%
0% 100%
0% 0%0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Cen
ter S
t0% 0%0% 0%0% 0%
0%
(0%) 0%Proposed New Dwy E. Beyer Blvd E. Beyer Blvd E. Beyer Blvd
(0%) 0% (100%) 0% (0%) 0%
(0%
) 0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (100%) 0% (0%) 0%
(0%) 0%
(100
%)
(0%
)(0
%) (0%)
(0%
)(0
%)
(0%
) (0%) 0%
(0%
)
0%
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project1 2 3 4
0% 0% 0%
E. B
eyer
Blv
d
0% 0%
Exis
ting
Dw
y
(0%
)(0
%)
(0%
) (0%) 0%
0% 0%
Hill
St 0% 0% 0%
(0%
)
X% / (Y%) = IN / OUT PERCENTDISTRIBUTION
#N/A
Existing Project Trip Distribution - Study Intersections
Legend
Existing Project Trip Distribution - Study Intersections#N/AK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Dist 1-12 (Existing)
4-3
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
50%
50%
100%
50%
100%
Legend
Project Trip Distribution
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments
4—4
FIGURE 4-2
Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 4-3Heavy Truck Trip Distribution
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\traffic distribution,ai
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement
study int
Street
Street name
Freeway
Ramp
E St
ProjectSite
ProposedExit Only Dwy
Existing Dwy
Camino de la
Pla
za
E. Beyer Blvd
Bolton
Cent
er
St
Hill St
E. San Ysidro Blvd
Border Village Rd
Hall Rd
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
805
INTERSTATE
CALIFORNIA
5
Legend:
Exiting Truck Trips
Entering Truck Trips
4-5
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
00
100 0
0
E. San Ysidro Blvd
0
0
0
10
0 10
10 10
00
0 0
E. San Ysidro Blvd0
000
00 0 0
6
0 0
0 0
0
000
0 0
0 0
0 00 00
00
0
0
0 0
00
0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
00 00
0 0
0
0 00
0 00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
000
9 10
0 0
00 0
0 0 0
0
0 00 0 0
0
Proposed New Dwy
2
00
00
0
0
00 0 00
0
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
0 00 0 00
0
0
0
0
00 0
3
0
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
0
0
00
E. Beyer Blvd
00
0 00
00
0
0 0
10 10
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0%
0 00 0
0
0 0 0
0 0
4
10 0 0
0
0
10
5
00 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Cen
ter S
t
0
0 0
0 00
00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
8
0 0
00
I-805
SB
Ram
p
0 0
10
I-805
NB
Ram
p
0
10
0
0 0
00 0
0 0 00 0 0
010
0 0
1010 10 0 0 0 0
00 0
0 00
0
0
0
0 0
0
10
10
7
0
00
0
00 0 10 010
0 000
10
Cen
ter S
t
0
0
0
0
11 12
00
E. San Ysidro Blvd
0
0 0
0
000
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
0 00 0
0
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
Legend
FIGURE 4-4
Project Trip Assignment-Study IntersectionsK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Proj Assign Figure 1-12
4—6 Project Trip Assignment-Study Intersections
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
68
68
137
68
137
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments
4—7
FIGURE 4-5
Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments
Traffic Impact Analysis Near Term ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 5—1 June 2010
5.0 NEAR TERM CONDITIONSThis section provides a description of near term conditions with the addition of the proposed projecttraffic.
Road Network
No roadway network changes are assumed to take place under the near term scenario.
Cumulative Projects
Discussions with City staff and research for other on-going traffic studies in the project vicinity identifiedthat there are not major projects that would need to be included in this study.
Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes for the near term baseline condition were equal to the existing traffic volumes. Inaddition, the proposed project traffic was added to the Near Term Baseline traffic volumes to estimate theNear Term with Project conditions.
Figures 5-1 through 5-4 show the peak-hour and ADT volumes with and without the project.
Intersection Analysis
Table 5-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Near Term with andwithout project scenarios. As shown in the table, all study intersections operate at LOS C or better duringboth peak periods with and without the proposed project.
Appendix B contains the peak-hour intersections LOS calculation worksheets.
Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 5-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under Near Term Conditions. As shown in the table,all study roadway segments will continue to operate at LOS C or better with and without the addition ofthe proposed project.
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
0000 0
0
0 0
0
136
74
311
457
0
0
0
0
0
0
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
0
109
I-805
NB
Ram
p
23 0434
0
000
0
452
48 4 12
0 000
0
0
0
8
0 00
00 0
0 00
0
0 0
0 0
00
00 0
0
0 00
0 0
0
0 0
0
00
0 0 00
0
0 00
0 00 0
0 0
0 0
0 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0
3 8 4
2
0
0 90 0 0 3 1
0
00
Proposed New Dwy
0 0113
0 4
17
22
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
27
2
175
0
360
00
0
0 0
7
00 36
0 126
00
E. Beyer Blvd
2
0
63 5
073
0
61
028
00
22
3
0 0
5 5
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0 024 74
0
5 0 0
5 0
4
5
00 0
0 0 0
39 107
0 00 54 58
0 0 200
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
010 72 0 Cen
ter S
t
0 0
46 70 226 262 0 0 0
0 1910 I-805
SB
Ram
p7
78 0 0 0
6
Cen
ter S
t
76 0 0
0
610 926
00 0
0
E. San Ysidro Blvd
0
365 65600
0 0
E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
030
110
411
11 0
0
390 927
0 0
00 0 187
575118
237
0 00
00
0 0 0
45
0 1
5120
4
287
0 0
00
0
373
211 0 02
203
318 0
3
43
9 10 11 12
0 0 00 0
000
0
0 0 0
0 00
0
0
FIGURE 5-1
Near Term Baseline PeaK Hour Traffic Volumes
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
Legend
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]NT Figure 1-12
Near Term Baseline PeaK Hour Traffic Volumes5—2
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
4,166
4,208
13,348
4,208
1,300
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Near Term Baseline ADT Volumes
5—3
FIGURE 5-2
Near Term Baseline ADT Volumes
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
0
E. Beyer Blvd
2
9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0
00
0000
00
068
0 0
0
6122
E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
0 0
3
48
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
0
462
45
0 1
51
216 0
20
00
0 0
00
0
287
I-805
SB
Ram
p7
0
318
51 75 226 262 0 0411610 926
00 0
0 0 00 0
370
11 0
390 927
24
0 136
0
74
0E. San Ysidro Blvd
5
00 0
0 0 0
39 107
0
83 0 0 0
6
Cen
ter S
t
81 0 0
0237 452
378
191
0
0 0
10 10
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0 0
4
24 74
0
0 0 0
0 00
10 72 0
Proposed New Dwy
2
22
3
00 36
0 126
00 0
00
0
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
175
0
360
023
00
100
90 0 0 3 1 2
10
0
22
3 8 4
2 0
64 68
0 00
63 5
Cen
ter S
t1130 4
22
0
661
30
110
311
0 0
0 0 0
00 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0
0 0
0
0 00 0
0
0 00
0
0
00 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 00
0
0 0
0 0000
00
0 00
0 0
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
0
114
I-805
NB
Ram
p
23 00
8
0 00
0
0
48 4 17
0 0
203
0 0
434
0
00
0 0
0 000 0 00 0
0
200
00 0 192
575118
0 0
0
0
00
0 0
0
0 00
0 00
0
Legend
FIGURE 5-3
Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]NTWP Figure 1-12
5—4 Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
4,234
4,209
13,418
4,209
1,370
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Near Term with Project ADT Volumes
5—5
FIGURE 5-4
Near Term with Project ADT Volumes
NEAR TERM BASELINENEAR TERM PLUS
PROJECT
INTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b) DELAY (a) LOS (b) (c) SIGNIFICANT?AM 9.7 A 9.7 NOPM 11.5 B 11.5 NOAM 7.6 A 7.6 A 0.0 NOPM 8.4 A 8.4 A 0.0 NOAM 8.9 A 9.0 A 0.1 NOPM 10.1 B 10.1 B 0.0 NOAM 8.5 A 1.6 A -6.9 NOPM 8.7 A 0.7 A -8.0 NOAM 10.4 B 10.5 B 0.1 NOPM 14.0 B 14.2 B 0.2 NOAM 17.5 B 17.5 B 0.0 NOPM 20.6 C 20.6 C 0.0 NOAM 14.9 B 15.1 B 0.2 NOPM 18.1 B 18.1 B 0.0 NO
Notes:
(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0(c) Change in delay due to addition of project traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Near-Term
TABLE 5-1NEAR TERM CONDITIONS
PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY
PEAKHOUR
2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St
This intersection does notexist under this scenario
3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd
1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd
6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp
7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp
4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy
5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St
(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At a two-way stop-controlled intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Near-Term
5—6
AD
TV
/CR
ATI
O (a
)L
OS
AD
TV
/CR
ATI
O (a
)L
OS
E. B
eyer
Blv
dPr
opos
ed D
wy
to C
ente
r St
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
04,
166
0.52
1C
4,23
40.
529
C0.
008
NO
Cen
ter S
t to
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
04,
208
0.52
6C
4,20
90.
526
C0.
000
NO
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
to E
xist
ing
Dw
y2
Lane
Col
lect
or8,
000
4,20
80.
526
C4,
209
0.52
6C
0.00
0N
OC
ente
r St
E.Sa
n Y
sidr
o B
lvd
to E
. Bey
er B
lvd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
01,
300
0.16
3A
1,37
00.
171
A0.
008
NO
E. S
an Y
sidr
o B
lvd
I-805
to C
ente
r St
4 La
ne C
olle
ctor
30,0
0013
,348
0.44
5B
13,4
180.
447
B0.
002
NO
Not
es:
(a) T
he v
/c R
atio
is c
alcu
late
d by
div
idin
g th
e A
DT
volu
me
by e
ach
resp
ectiv
e ro
adw
ay se
gmen
t's c
apac
ity.
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\09
5596
020\
San
Ysi
dro
Yar
d Tr
affic
Stu
dy\E
xcel
\[526
021R
S01.
xlsm
]201
0
RO
AD
WA
Y S
EGM
EN
T
NE
AR
TE
RM
CO
ND
ITIO
NS
TAB
LE 5
-2
in V
/CSI
GN
IFIC
AN
T?
LO
S E
CA
PAC
ITY
NEA
R T
ERM
BA
SEL
INE
NEA
R T
ERM
PLU
S PR
OJE
CT
RO
AD
WA
Y SE
GM
EN
T LO
S SU
MM
AR
Y
RO
AD
WA
YC
LA
SSIF
ICA
TIO
N
5-7
Traffic Impact Analysis 2030 Horizon Year ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 6—1 June 2010
6.0 2030 HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONSThis section provides a description of the 2030 Horizon Year with the addition of the proposed project.
Road Network
No roadway network changes are assumed to take place under the Horizon Year scenario.
Traffic Volumes
The Horizon Year Average Daily Traffic volumes on the roadway segments in the study area weredetermined from SANDAG’s 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (Mobility 2030) and the Final 2030Regional Growth Forecast. To estimate the Horizon Year turning movement volumes at the studyintersections, the existing turning movements at each respective study intersection were factored up basedon the projected ADT volumes along each approach. A copy of the Year 2030 SANDAG forecast plotand worksheet calculations to estimate the future turning movements can be found in Appendix C.
Figures 6-1 illustrates the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline peak-hour traffic volumes at the studyintersections, while Figure 6-2 presents the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline ADT volumes along theroadway segments.
To determine the traffic volumes under the 2030 Horizon Year with the project scenario, the tripsassociated with the project were added to the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline volumes at the studyintersections and roadway segments. Figures 6-3 illustrates the Horizon Year with the project’s peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections, while Figure 6-4 presents the 2030 Horizon Year with theproject’s ADT volumes along the roadway segments.
Intersection Analysis
Table 6-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Horizon Year with andwithout project scenarios. As shown in the table, all study intersections will operate at LOS D or betterduring both peak periods with and without the proposed project.
Appendix B contains the peak-hour intersections LOS calculation worksheets.
Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 6-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under 2030 Horizon Year Scenario. As shown in thetable, under Horizon Year scenario, East Beyer Boulevard is expected to operate at LOS F. The additionof the project traffic will not exceed the City of San Diego’s threshold for determining significance andthe project is not considered to have a significant cumulative impact along this roadway segment. Allother study roadway segments will operate at LOS D or better with and without the addition of theproposed project.
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
0000 0
0
0 0
0
102
67
379
575
0
0
0
0
0
0
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
0
197
I-805
NB
Ram
p
119 0629
0
000
0
698
120 6 7
0 000
0
0
0
8
0 00
00 0
0 00
0
0 0
0 0
00
00 0
0
0 00
0 0
0
0 0
0
00
0 0 00
0
0 00
0 00 0
0 0
0 0
0 000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0
11 9 6
5
0
025
3 0 0 3 3
0
00
Proposed New Dwy
0 0372
0 10
22
91
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
35
2
517
0
5232
00
0
0 0
6
00 138
0 382
00
E. Beyer Blvd
4
0
139
5
0127
0
5010
057
00
81
3
0 0
3 3
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0 064 174
0
3 0 0
3 0
4
5
00 0
0 0 0
84 227
0 00 115 135
0 0 197
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
040
216 0 Cen
ter S
t
0 0
80 125 218 202 0 0 0
0 2130 I-805
SB
Ram
p7
148
0 0 0
6
Cen
ter S
t
142 0 0
0
610 1270
00 0
0
E. San Ysidro Blvd
0
561 101600
0 0
E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
020
129
587
30 0
0
448 1125
0 0
00 0 231
855119
359
0 00
00
0 0 0
47
0 6
18774
3
410
0 0
00
0
413
230 0 02
218
316 0
33
81
9 10 11 12
0 0 00 0
000
0
0 0 0
0 00
0
0
FIGURE 6-1
Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
Legend
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]BO Figure 1-12
Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes6—2
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
8,900
8,942
20,000
9,600
2,500
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes
6—3
FIGURE 6-2
Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / // / / // / / /
/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /
0
E. Beyer Blvd
1
9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0
00
0000
00
0122
0 0
0
501030
E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd
0 0
33
86
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
0
580
47
0 6
187
235 0
74
00
0 0
00
0
410
I-805
SB
Ram
p7
0
316
85 130 218 202 0 0587610 1270
00 0
0 0 00 0
566
30 0
448 1125
23
0 102
0
67
0E. San Ysidro Blvd
5
00 0
0 0 0
84 227
0
153
0 0 0
6
Cen
ter S
t
147 0 0
0359 698
418
213
0
0 0
8 8
Exis
ting
Dw
y
E. Beyer Blvd
0 0
4
64 174
0
-2 0 0
-2 00
4021
6 0
Proposed New Dwy
2
81
3
00 138
0 382
00 0
00
0
Hill
St
E. Beyer Blvd
517
0
5232
052
00
10025
3 0 0 3 3 4
10
0
91
11 9 6
5 0
125 145
0 00
139
5
Cen
ter S
t3720 10
27
0
1021
20
129
379
0 0
0 0 0
00 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0
0 0
0
0 00 0
0
0 00
0
0
00 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 00
0
0 0
0 0000
00
0 00
0 0
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
E. B
eyer
Blv
d1
0
202
I-805
NB
Ram
p
119 00
8
0 00
0
0
120 6 12
0 0
218
0 0
629
0
00
0 0
0 000 0 00 0
0
197
00 0 236
855119
0 0
0
0
00
0 0
0
0 00
0 00
0
Legend
FIGURE 6-3
X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]BOWP Figure 1-12
6—4 Horizon Year with Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project
8,968
8,943
20,070
9,601
2,570
Legend
X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes
6—5
FIGURE 6-4
Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes
HORIZON YEARBASELINE
HORIZON YEAR PLUSPROJECT
INTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b) DELAY (a) LOS (b) (c) SIGNIFICANT?AM 13.0 B 13.0 NOPM 27.8 D 27.8 NOAM 10.0 B 10.1 B 0.1 NOPM 23.7 C 24.9 C 1.2 NOAM 9.8 A 9.8 A 0.0 NOPM 15.5 C 15.5 C 0.0 NOAM 8.8 A 0.7 A -8.1 NOPM 9.3 A 0.3 A -9.0 NOAM 11.9 B 12.0 B 0.1 NOPM 22.5 C 23.1 C 0.6 NOAM 18.6 B 18.6 B 0.0 NOPM 39.1 D 39.7 D 0.6 NOAM 16.1 B 16.1 B 0.0 NOPM 20.0 C 20.0 C 0.0 NO
Notes:
(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0(c) Change in delay due to addition of project traffic
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Build-Out
TABLE 6-1HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS
PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY
PEAKHOUR
2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St
This intersection does notexist under this scenario
3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd
1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd
6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp
7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp
4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy
5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St
(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At a two-way stop-controlled intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Build-Out
6—6
AD
TV
/CR
AT
IO (a
)L
OS
AD
TV
/CR
AT
IO (a
)L
OS
E. B
eyer
Blv
dPr
opos
ed D
wy
to C
ente
r St
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
08,
900
1.11
3F
8,96
81.
121
F0.
008
NO
Cen
ter S
t to
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
08,
942
1.11
8F
8,94
31.
118
F0.
000
NO
Bol
ton
Hal
l Rd
to E
xist
ing
Dw
y2
Lane
Col
lect
or8,
000
9,60
01.
200
F9,
601
1.20
0F
0.00
0N
OC
ente
r St
E.Sa
n Y
sidr
o B
lvd
to E
. Bey
er B
lvd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
02,
500
0.31
3B
2,57
00.
321
B0.
008
NO
E. S
an Y
sidr
o B
lvd
I-805
to C
ente
r St
4 La
ne C
olle
ctor
30,0
0020
,000
0.66
7D
20,0
700.
669
D0.
002
NO
Not
es:
(a) T
he v
/c R
atio
is c
alcu
late
d by
div
idin
g th
e A
DT
volu
me
by ea
ch re
spec
tive
road
way
segm
ent's
cap
acity
.
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\09
5596
020\
San
Ysi
dro
Yar
d Tr
affic
Stu
dy\E
xcel
\[526
021R
S01.
xlsm
]203
0
HO
RIZ
ON
YE
AR
CO
ND
ITIO
NS
TAB
LE 6
-2
in V
/CSI
GN
IFIC
AN
T?L
OS
EC
APA
CIT
Y
HO
RIZ
ON
YEA
R B
ASE
LIN
EH
OR
IZO
N Y
EAR
PLU
S PR
OJE
CT
RO
AD
WA
Y SE
GM
EN
T LO
S SU
MM
AR
Y
RO
AD
WA
YC
LA
SSIF
ICA
TIO
NR
OA
DW
AY
SEG
MEN
T
6-7
Traffic Impact Analysis Other IssuesSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 7—1 June 2010
7.0 OTHER ISSUESThe following section discusses other traffic related issues related to the proposed project.
Site Access and On-site circulation
The proposed project will have access along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard just east of BoltonHall Road via an existing driveway. The project traffic will exit the site using a new driveway proposedto be constructed along the east side of East Beyer Boulevard, just north of the railroad crossing bridge.The on-site circulation for the project site was found to be adequate to accommodate vehiclesentrance/exits to the site.
Sight Distance
Speed data was collected along East Beyer Boulevard at the location of the proposed driveway by TrueCounts on Tuesday July 14, 2009. A copy of the speed survey data can be found in Appendix E. Thespeed survey indicates that the prevailing speed along East Beyer Boulevard for vehicles traveling in thenorthbound direction is 38 miles per hour while the prevailing speed for the southbound direction is 41miles per hour. Per Table 405.1A of Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the minimum corner sightdistance for the proposed new driveway measured as indicated in Section 405.1 of the same manualshould be 440 feet for both directions of traffic. Field sight distance measurements were taken at theproposed project driveway along the east side of East Beyer Boulevard. To the north of the proposedproject driveway, the corner sight distance exceeds the minimum 440 feet required. To the south of theproposed project driveway, the existing railroad bridge overpass across East Beyer Boulevard limits thecorner sight visibility to less than the minimum required by Caltran’s Highway Design Manual. TheHighway Design Manual indicates that when the minimum corner sight distance cannot be obtained dueto restrictive conditions, the minimum value of corner sight distance for unsignalized intersections shallbe equal to the stopping sight distance as given in Table 201.1 of Caltran’s Highway Design Manual. PerTable 201.1 the minimum stopping sight distance for 40 miles per hour road is 300 feet. The proposeddriveway location will meet the minimum stopping sight distance as required by Caltrans HighwayDesign Manual Table 201.1 for both directions of traffic. Figure 7-1 illustrates the sight distanceevaluation.
NOT TO SCALE
N
300’ south of proposednew driveway (minimumstoppping sight distance)
Legend:
Line of Minimum Stopping Sight Distance
Minimum Corner Sight Distance
I-805 NB
proposed newdriveway
440’ north of proposednew driveway (minimum
corner sight distance)
existingrailroad overpass
440’ south of proposednew driveway (minimum
corner sight distance)
existingobstruction
I-805 SB
E. BEYER BLVD
FIGURE 7-1Sight Distance Evaluation
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\Site Visibility,ai
San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement
7-2
Traffic Impact Analysis Findings and ConclusionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 8—1 June 2010
8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSThe following section provides a summary of the key findings and study recommendations and includes asummary table that compares the results from the different scenarios.
Summary of Intersection Analyses
Table 8-1 displays the peak-hour LOS at all the study intersections for the different scenarios analyzed.As shown in the table, all intersections would operate at LOS D or better during all peak periods under allscenarios.
Summary of Roadway Segment Analyses
Table 8-2 displays the LOS at all the study roadway segments for the different scenarios analyzed. Asshown in the table, under Horizon Year scenario, East Beyer Boulevard is expected to operate at LOS F.The addition of the project traffic will not exceed the City of San Diego’s threshold for determiningsignificance and the project is not considered to have a significant cumulative impact along this roadwaysegment. All other study roadway segments will operate at LOS D or better with and without the additionof the proposed project under all scenarios.
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Reports\596020rp01.doc
EX
IST
ING
NE
AR
TE
RM
BA
SEL
INE
NE
AR
TE
RM
PL
US
PRO
JEC
TH
OR
IZO
N Y
EA
RB
ASE
LIN
EH
OR
IZO
N Y
EA
R P
LU
SPR
OJE
CT
INT
ER
SEC
TIO
ND
EL
AY
(a)
LO
S (b
)D
EL
AY
(a)
LO
S (b
)D
EL
AY
(a)
LO
S (b
)D
EL
AY
(a)
LO
S (b
)D
EL
AY
(a)
LO
S (b
)
AM
9.7
A13
.0B
PM11
.5B
27.8
DA
M7.
6A
7.6
A7.
6A
10.0
B10
.1B
PM8.
4A
8.4
A8.
4A
23.7
C24
.9C
AM
8.9
A8.
9A
9.0
A9.
8A
9.8
APM
10.1
B10
.1B
10.1
B15
.5C
15.5
CA
M8.
5A
8.5
A1.
6A
8.8
A0.
7A
PM8.
7A
8.7
A0.
7A
9.3
A0.
3A
AM
10.4
B10
.4B
10.5
B11
.9B
12.0
BPM
14.0
B14
.0B
14.2
B22
.5C
23.1
CA
M17
.5B
17.5
B17
.5B
18.6
B18
.6B
PM20
.6C
20.6
C20
.6C
39.1
D39
.7D
AM
14.9
B14
.9B
15.1
B16
.1B
16.1
BPM
18.1
B18
.1B
18.1
B20
.0C
20.0
CN
otes
:
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\09
5596
020\
San
Ysi
dro
Yar
d Tr
affic
Stu
dy\E
xcel
\[526
021I
N01
.xls
m]S
umm
ary
This
inte
rsec
tion
does
not
exis
t und
er th
is s
cena
rioTh
is in
ters
ectio
n do
es n
otex
ist u
nder
this
sce
nario
This
inte
rsec
tion
does
not
exis
t und
er th
is s
cena
rio
TAB
LE 8
-1SU
MM
AR
Y O
F P
EA
K-H
OU
R IN
TER
SEC
TIO
N L
OS
RE
SULT
S
PEA
KH
OU
R
5E.
San
Ysi
dro
Blv
d &
Cen
ter S
t
6E.
San
Ysi
dro
Blv
d &
I-80
5 N
B R
amp
3E.
Bey
er B
lvd
& B
olto
n H
all R
d
4E.
Bey
er B
lvd
& E
xist
ing
Dw
y
1Pr
opos
ed N
ew D
wy
& E
. Bey
er B
lvd
2E.
Bey
er B
lvd
& H
ill S
t
7E.
San
Ysi
dro
Blv
d &
I-80
5 SB
Ram
p
(a) D
elay
refe
rs to
the
aver
age
cont
rol d
elay
for t
he e
ntire
inte
rsec
tion,
mea
sure
d in
seco
nds p
er v
ehic
le.
At a
two-
way
stop
-con
trolle
d in
ters
ectio
n, d
elay
refe
rs to
the
wor
st m
ovem
ent.
(b) L
OS
calc
ulat
ions
are
bas
ed o
n th
e m
etho
dolo
gy o
utlin
ed in
the
2000
Hig
hway
Cap
acity
Man
ual
and
perf
orm
ed u
sing
Syn
chro
6.0
8-2
AD
TL
OS
AD
TL
OS
AD
TL
OS
AD
TL
OS
AD
TL
OS
E. B
eyer
Blv
dPr
opos
ed D
wy
to C
ente
r St
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
04,
166
C4,
166
C4,
234
C8,
900
F8,
968
FC
ente
r St t
o Bo
lton
Hal
l Rd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
04,
208
C4,
208
C4,
209
C8,
942
F8,
943
FBo
lton
Hal
l Rd
to E
xist
ing
Dw
y2
Lane
Col
lect
or8,
000
4,20
8C
4,20
8C
4,20
9C
9,60
0F
9,60
1F
Cen
ter
StE.
San
Ysid
ro B
lvd
to E
. Bey
er B
lvd
2 La
ne C
olle
ctor
8,00
01,
300
A1,
300
A1,
370
A2,
500
B2,
570
BE
. San
Ysi
dro
Blvd
I-805
to C
ente
r St
4 La
ne C
olle
ctor
30,0
0013
,348
B13
,348
B13
,418
B20
,000
D20
,070
DN
otes
:B
old
valu
es in
dica
te ro
adw
ay se
gmen
ts o
pera
ting
at L
OS
E or
F.
(a) T
he v
/c R
atio
is c
alcu
late
d by
div
idin
g th
e A
DT
volu
me
by ea
ch re
spec
tive
road
way
segm
ent's
cap
acity
.
K:\S
ND
_TR
AN
S\09
5596
020\
San
Ysid
ro Y
ard
Traf
fic S
tudy
\Exc
el\[5
2602
1RS0
1.xl
sm]S
umm
ary
SUM
MA
RY
OF
RO
AD
WA
Y SE
GM
EN
T LO
S R
ESU
LTS
TAB
LE 8
-2
LO
S E
CA
PAC
ITY
EX
IST
ING
NE
AR
TE
RM
PL
US
PRO
JEC
TR
OA
DW
AY
CLA
SSIF
ICA
TIO
NR
OA
DW
AY
SE
GM
EN
T
NE
AR
TE
RM
BA
SEL
INE
HO
RIZ
ON
YEA
RB
ASE
LIN
EH
OR
IZO
N Y
EAR
PLU
S PR
OJE
CT
8-3
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Existing Traffic Volumes Data
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.03.CENTER ST.BEYER BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 1
Groups Printed- VehiclesCENTER STSouthbound
BEYER BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
BEYER BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total
07:00 1 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 6 10 0 3907:15 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 5 16 2 4007:30 0 3 0 1 3 3 0 0 7 1 1 0 1 10 13 2 4507:45 0 1 0 1 4 10 1 2 15 0 1 2 0 10 19 1 67Total 3 6 0 5 7 21 1 3 38 3 3 6 1 31 58 5 191
08:00 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 0 8 1 2 1 0 11 16 1 4808:15 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 13 2 7 0 0 6 9 0 4208:30 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 2 12 1 2 2 0 9 10 2 4808:45 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 1 10 0 3 0 0 20 16 0 59Total 1 4 2 0 5 17 1 3 43 4 14 3 0 46 51 3 197
*** BREAK ***
16:00 1 2 1 0 3 17 0 1 19 0 7 1 0 26 14 3 9516:15 1 1 0 0 8 16 0 0 17 4 7 1 1 26 12 1 9516:30 2 1 0 0 6 12 2 2 10 2 7 1 1 31 19 1 9716:45 0 3 0 1 5 16 1 2 13 3 7 0 0 27 11 0 89Total 4 7 1 1 22 61 3 5 59 9 28 3 2 110 56 5 376
17:00 1 4 0 0 8 10 1 0 11 3 4 1 0 19 12 1 7517:15 0 0 1 0 7 26 1 0 17 1 3 4 0 27 22 0 10917:30 3 3 0 0 7 14 1 0 15 1 7 0 1 33 16 1 10217:45 0 1 2 1 5 10 0 2 20 0 3 3 3 34 8 0 92Total 4 8 3 1 27 60 3 2 63 5 17 8 4 113 58 2 378
Grand Total 12 25 6 7 61 159 8 13 203 21 62 20 7 300 223 15 1142Apprch % 24 50 12 14 25.3 66 3.3 5.4 66.3 6.9 20.3 6.5 1.3 55 40.9 2.8
Total % 1.1 2.2 0.5 0.6 5.3 13.9 0.7 1.1 17.8 1.8 5.4 1.8 0.6 26.3 19.5 1.3
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.03.CENTER ST.BEYER BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 2
CENTER STSouthbound
BEYER BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
BEYER BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:4507:45 0 1 0 1 2 4 10 1 2 17 15 0 1 2 18 0 10 19 1 30 6708:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 4 1 0 7 8 1 2 1 12 0 11 16 1 28 4808:15 1 1 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 13 2 7 0 22 0 6 9 0 15 4208:30 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 0 2 9 12 1 2 2 17 0 9 10 2 21 48
Total Volume 1 3 2 1 7 7 22 2 4 35 48 4 12 5 69 0 36 54 4 94 205% App. Total 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 20 62.9 5.7 11.4 69.6 5.8 17.4 7.2 0 38.3 57.4 4.3
PHF .250 .750 .500 .250 .583 .438 .550 .500 .500 .515 .800 .500 .429 .625 .784 .000 .818 .711 .500 .783 .765
CENTER ST
BE
YE
R B
LV
D B
EY
ER
BL
VD
CENTER ST
Right2
Thru3
Left1
Peds1
InOut Total6 7 13
Rig
ht2
Th
ru22
L
eft7
P
ed
s4
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
49
3
5
84
Left48
Thru4
Right12
Peds5
Out TotalIn64 69 133
Le
ft0
T
hru3
6
Rig
ht
54
P
ed
s4
To
tal
Ou
tIn
72
9
4
16
6
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.03.CENTER ST.BEYER BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 3
CENTER STSouthbound
BEYER BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
BEYER BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:0017:00 1 4 0 0 5 8 10 1 0 19 11 3 4 1 19 0 19 12 1 32 7517:15 0 0 1 0 1 7 26 1 0 34 17 1 3 4 25 0 27 22 0 49 10917:30 3 3 0 0 6 7 14 1 0 22 15 1 7 0 23 1 33 16 1 51 10217:45 0 1 2 1 4 5 10 0 2 17 20 0 3 3 26 3 34 8 0 45 92
Total Volume 4 8 3 1 16 27 60 3 2 92 63 5 17 8 93 4 113 58 2 177 378% App. Total 25 50 18.8 6.2 29.3 65.2 3.3 2.2 67.7 5.4 18.3 8.6 2.3 63.8 32.8 1.1
PHF .333 .500 .375 .250 .667 .844 .577 .750 .250 .676 .788 .417 .607 .500 .894 .333 .831 .659 .500 .868 .867
CENTER ST
BE
YE
R B
LV
D B
EY
ER
BL
VD
CENTER ST
Right3
Thru8
Left4
Peds1
InOut Total12 16 28
Rig
ht3
Th
ru60
L
eft27
P
ed
s2
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
13
4
92
2
26
Left63
Thru5
Right17
Peds8
Out TotalIn93 93 186
Le
ft4
T
hru11
3
Rig
ht
58
P
ed
s2
To
tal
Ou
tIn
12
6
17
7
30
3
Peak Hour Begins at 17:00 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.04.BEYER BLVD.BOLTON HALL RDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/21/2009Page No : 1
Groups Printed- VehiclesBEYER BLVDSouthbound
BOLTON HALL RDWestbound
BEYER BLVDNorthbound
BOLTON HALL RDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total
07:00 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1307:15 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 3 2007:30 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 1 2207:45 0 8 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 1 0 1 1 27Total 0 30 11 0 0 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 4 0 1 7 82
08:00 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 2208:15 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 3 2208:30 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2008:45 0 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 35Total 0 43 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 1 0 1 5 99
*** BREAK ***
16:00 0 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 4 0 2 0 4416:15 0 34 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 6 0 2 1 7316:30 0 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 15 0 0 5 0 2 1 5116:45 0 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 5 0 1 0 68Total 0 89 45 0 0 0 0 0 8 65 0 0 20 0 7 2 236
17:00 0 24 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 6 0 1 2 6517:15 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 6 0 0 3 6917:30 0 33 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 5 0 1 2 7017:45 0 23 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 0 0 2 0 2 0 46Total 0 102 40 1 0 0 0 1 6 70 0 0 19 0 4 7 250
Grand Total 0 264 116 1 0 0 0 2 17 189 0 0 44 0 13 21 667Apprch % 0 69.3 30.4 0.3 0 0 0 100 8.3 91.7 0 0 56.4 0 16.7 26.9
Total % 0 39.6 17.4 0.1 0 0 0 0.3 2.5 28.3 0 0 6.6 0 1.9 3.1
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.04.BEYER BLVD.BOLTON HALL RDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/21/2009Page No : 2
BEYER BLVDSouthbound
BOLTON HALL RDWestbound
BEYER BLVDNorthbound
BOLTON HALL RDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:0008:00 0 9 5 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 1 2208:15 0 7 3 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 1 0 0 3 4 2208:30 0 9 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 2 2008:45 0 18 8 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 35
Total Volume 0 43 20 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 29 1 0 1 5 7 99% App. Total 0 68.3 31.7 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 96.6 0 0 14.3 0 14.3 71.4
PHF .000 .597 .625 .000 .606 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .778 .000 .000 .806 .250 .000 .250 .417 .438 .707
BEYER BLVD
BO
LT
ON
HA
LL
RD
BO
LT
ON
HA
LL
RD
BEYER BLVD
Right20
Thru43
Left0
Peds0
InOut Total29 63 92
Rig
ht0
Th
ru0
Le
ft0
Pe
ds0
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
0
0
0
Left1
Thru28
Right0
Peds0
Out TotalIn44 29 73
Le
ft1
T
hru
0
Rig
ht1
Pe
ds5
To
tal
Ou
tIn
21
7
2
8
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.04.BEYER BLVD.BOLTON HALL RDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/21/2009Page No : 3
BEYER BLVDSouthbound
BOLTON HALL RDWestbound
BEYER BLVDNorthbound
BOLTON HALL RDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:4516:45 0 30 15 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 17 5 0 1 0 6 6817:00 0 24 13 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 19 6 0 1 2 9 6517:15 0 22 11 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 27 6 0 0 3 9 6917:30 0 33 12 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 16 5 0 1 2 8 70
Total Volume 0 109 51 1 161 0 0 0 0 0 6 73 0 0 79 22 0 3 7 32 272% App. Total 0 67.7 31.7 0.6 0 0 0 0 7.6 92.4 0 0 68.8 0 9.4 21.9
PHF .000 .826 .850 .250 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .760 .000 .000 .731 .917 .000 .750 .583 .889 .971
BEYER BLVD
BO
LT
ON
HA
LL
RD
BO
LT
ON
HA
LL
RD
BEYER BLVD
Right51
Thru109
Left0
Peds1
InOut Total95 161 256
Rig
ht0
Th
ru0
Le
ft0
Pe
ds0
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
0
0
0
Left6
Thru73
Right0
Peds0
Out TotalIn112 79 191
Le
ft22
T
hru
0
Rig
ht3
Pe
ds7
To
tal
Ou
tIn
57
3
2
89
Peak Hour Begins at 16:45 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.01.CENTER ST.SAN YSIDRO BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 1
Groups Printed- VehiclesCENTER STSouthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total
07:00 0 0 13 6 0 60 3 0 0 0 0 3 10 79 0 0 17407:15 1 0 21 12 0 58 3 0 0 0 0 1 8 90 0 0 19407:30 0 0 20 12 0 72 6 0 0 0 0 4 8 98 0 0 22007:45 1 0 21 12 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 4 17 113 0 0 237Total 2 0 75 42 0 259 12 0 0 0 0 12 43 380 0 0 825
08:00 0 0 23 14 0 69 2 3 0 0 0 7 11 130 0 0 25908:15 0 0 13 3 0 112 3 0 0 0 0 10 12 146 0 0 29908:30 0 0 12 4 0 96 4 0 0 0 0 6 13 140 0 0 27508:45 0 0 28 12 0 113 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 194 0 0 361Total 0 0 76 33 0 390 11 3 0 0 0 25 46 610 0 0 1194
*** BREAK ***
16:00 1 0 20 6 0 205 6 10 0 0 0 5 17 228 0 0 49816:15 2 0 20 13 0 235 8 8 0 0 0 8 19 243 0 2 55816:30 2 0 23 9 0 265 4 0 0 0 0 5 13 229 0 0 55016:45 0 0 15 2 0 222 5 0 0 0 0 7 21 226 0 0 498Total 5 0 78 30 0 927 23 18 0 0 0 25 70 926 0 2 2104
17:00 1 0 22 10 0 227 4 1 0 0 0 4 10 215 0 0 49417:15 0 0 26 9 0 194 7 2 0 0 0 7 16 211 0 1 47317:30 0 0 30 4 0 193 2 6 0 0 0 10 17 180 0 0 44217:45 1 0 14 6 0 189 7 3 0 0 0 15 19 207 0 0 461Total 2 0 92 29 0 803 20 12 0 0 0 36 62 813 0 1 1870
Grand Total 9 0 321 134 0 2379 66 33 0 0 0 98 221 2729 0 3 5993Apprch % 1.9 0 69.2 28.9 0 96 2.7 1.3 0 0 0 100 7.5 92.4 0 0.1
Total % 0.2 0 5.4 2.2 0 39.7 1.1 0.6 0 0 0 1.6 3.7 45.5 0 0.1
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.01.CENTER ST.SAN YSIDRO BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 2
CENTER STSouthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:0008:00 0 0 23 14 37 0 69 2 3 74 0 0 0 7 7 11 130 0 0 141 25908:15 0 0 13 3 16 0 112 3 0 115 0 0 0 10 10 12 146 0 0 158 29908:30 0 0 12 4 16 0 96 4 0 100 0 0 0 6 6 13 140 0 0 153 27508:45 0 0 28 12 40 0 113 2 0 115 0 0 0 2 2 10 194 0 0 204 361
Total Volume 0 0 76 33 109 0 390 11 3 404 0 0 0 25 25 46 610 0 0 656 1194% App. Total 0 0 69.7 30.3 0 96.5 2.7 0.7 0 0 0 100 7 93 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .679 .589 .681 .000 .863 .688 .250 .878 .000 .000 .000 .625 .625 .885 .786 .000 .000 .804 .827
CENTER ST
SA
N Y
SID
RO
BL
VD
SA
N Y
SID
RO
BL
VD
CENTER ST
Right76
Thru0
Left0
Peds33
InOut Total57 109 166
Rig
ht
11
T
hru
39
0
Le
ft0
Pe
ds3
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
61
0
40
4
10
14
Left0
Thru0
Right0
Peds25
Out TotalIn0 25 25
Le
ft46
T
hru61
0
Rig
ht0
Pe
ds0
To
tal
Ou
tIn
46
6
65
6
11
22
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
True Count3401 First Ave #123
San Diego, CA 92103
File Name : 9071.01.CENTER ST.SAN YSIDRO BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 3
CENTER STSouthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDWestbound
CENTER STNorthbound
SAN YSIDRO BLVDEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:0016:00 1 0 20 6 27 0 205 6 10 221 0 0 0 5 5 17 228 0 0 245 49816:15 2 0 20 13 35 0 235 8 8 251 0 0 0 8 8 19 243 0 2 264 55816:30 2 0 23 9 34 0 265 4 0 269 0 0 0 5 5 13 229 0 0 242 55016:45 0 0 15 2 17 0 222 5 0 227 0 0 0 7 7 21 226 0 0 247 498
Total Volume 5 0 78 30 113 0 927 23 18 968 0 0 0 25 25 70 926 0 2 998 2104% App. Total 4.4 0 69 26.5 0 95.8 2.4 1.9 0 0 0 100 7 92.8 0 0.2
PHF .625 .000 .848 .577 .807 .000 .875 .719 .450 .900 .000 .000 .000 .781 .781 .833 .953 .000 .250 .945 .943
CENTER ST
SA
N Y
SID
RO
BL
VD
SA
N Y
SID
RO
BL
VD
CENTER ST
Right78
Thru0
Left5
Peds30
InOut Total93 113 206
Rig
ht
23
T
hru
92
7
Le
ft0
Pe
ds18
Ou
tT
ota
lIn
93
1
96
8
18
99
Left0
Thru0
Right0
Peds25
Out TotalIn0 25 25
Le
ft70
T
hru92
6
Rig
ht0
Pe
ds2
To
tal
Ou
tIn
10
05
9
98
2
00
3
Peak Hour Begins at 16:00 Vehicles
Peak Hour Data
North
Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N-S STREET: DATE: 06/05/2007 LOCATION:
E-W STREET: DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1.5 0.5
6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM 10 15 39 58 34 24 1807:15 AM 12 17 47 60 37 25 1987:30 AM 14 25 57 65 41 28 2307:45 AM 18 20 71 120 54 46 3298:00 AM 16 20 37 78 50 46 2478:15 AM 16 35 52 84 77 56 3208:30 AM 24 35 66 83 56 39 3038:45 AM 14 45 42 93 66 52 3129:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM
10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 124 0 212 0 0 0 411 641 0 0 415 316 2119
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d336 727 0 0 1052 853 731 539
745 AM
PEAKVOLUMES = 74 0 110 0 0 0 226 365 0 0 237 187 1199
PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.911
CONTROL: Signalized
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.780 0.000 0.774
07-4107-009
AM Peak Hr Begins at:
City of San Diego
0.797
WESTBOUND
I-805 NB ramps
E San Ysidro Blvd
Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N-S STREET: DATE: 06/05/2007 LOCATION:
E-W STREET: DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1.5 0.5
1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM 40 1 57 77 170 106 98 5494:15 PM 23 2 79 61 145 110 102 5224:30 PM 38 1 70 58 169 111 115 5624:45 PM 26 0 59 58 153 117 103 5165:00 PM 27 1 80 50 181 99 96 5345:15 PM 28 1 81 69 158 110 121 5685:30 PM 38 0 78 81 158 128 133 6165:45 PM 43 1 72 62 159 115 107 5596:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 263 7 576 0 0 0 516 1293 0 0 896 875 4426
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d846 1398 0 0 1809 1869 1771 1159
500 PM
PEAKVOLUMES = 136 3 311 0 0 0 262 656 0 0 452 457 2277
PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.924
CONTROL: Signalized
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.970 0.000 0.960
07-4107-009
PM Peak Hr Begins at:
City of San Diego
0.871
WESTBOUND
I-805 NB ramps
E San Ysidro Blvd
Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N-S STREET: DATE: 05/31/2007 LOCATION:
E-W STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 2 0 1 2 0
6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM 19 0 25 54 14 7 38 1577:15 AM 15 0 43 87 25 7 49 2267:30 AM 36 0 48 105 20 5 48 2627:45 AM 54 1 62 121 33 6 48 3258:00 AM 53 1 37 112 29 12 63 3078:15 AM 41 0 47 102 31 8 75 3048:30 AM 52 1 56 83 26 14 82 3148:45 AM 65 0 63 114 32 11 67 3529:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM
10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 0 0 0 335 3 381 0 778 210 70 470 0 2247
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d0 0 719 283 988 1113 540 851
800 AM
PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 211 2 203 0 411 118 45 287 0 1277
PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.907
CONTROL: Signalized
07-4107-008
AM Peak Hr Begins at:
City of San Diego
0.865
WESTBOUND
I-805 SB ramps
E San Ysidro Blvd
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.000 0.813 0.906
Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N-S STREET: DATE: 05/31/2007 LOCATION:
E-W STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 2 0 1 2 0
1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM 83 2 48 137 74 53 112 5094:15 PM 97 1 50 144 70 47 112 5214:30 PM 88 1 56 145 89 48 119 5464:45 PM 105 0 46 149 85 43 91 5195:00 PM 85 1 50 133 77 55 93 4945:15 PM 98 3 58 140 84 41 88 5125:30 PM 98 0 58 131 88 35 110 5205:45 PM 98 0 50 123 98 31 89 4896:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM
TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 0 0 0 752 8 416 0 1102 665 353 814 0 4110
nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d0 0 1176 1026 1767 1854 1167 1230
400 PM
PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 373 4 200 0 575 318 191 434 0 2095
PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.959
CONTROL: Signalized
07-4107-008
PM Peak Hr Begins at:
City of San Diego
0.936
WESTBOUND
I-805 SB ramps
E San Ysidro Blvd
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
0.000 0.955 0.954
MetroCount Traffic Executive Vehicle Counts
VehicleCount-1617 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) In profile: Vehicles = 1911 / 10933 (17.48%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=1911, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
17 13 11 10 22 31 40 103 174 115 73 100 94 101 111 126 140 160 123 112 89 62 54 30
2 7 3 2 7 4 12 11 53 51 16 31 30 25 23 30 34 37 32 20 27 14 10 8 -
5 2 1 4 4 6 9 20 44 29 17 21 15 23 25 22 36 46 32 32 28 21 12 9 -
7 0 2 1 6 7 9 25 40 14 19 26 20 27 29 38 36 46 33 30 21 12 13 7 -
3 4 5 3 5 14 10 47 37 21 21 22 29 26 34 36 34 31 26 30 13 15 19 6 -
AM Peak 0745 - 0845 (184), AM PHF=0.87
MetroCount Traffic Executive Vehicle Counts
VehicleCount-1618 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) In profile: Vehicles = 2255 / 10933 (20.63%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=2255, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
9 8 8 9 30 44 60 125 149 136 124 143 149 137 136 154 167 165 196 105 96 52 33 20
0 3 4 2 7 10 11 20 23 38 22 42 34 41 37 41 52 45 49 21 27 13 5 8 -
2 1 1 3 3 6 13 30 39 30 29 24 40 34 28 38 38 41 55 31 28 16 12 8 -
1 3 2 1 11 10 19 37 35 30 31 42 41 33 31 40 37 40 55 36 19 16 12 2 -
6 1 1 3 9 18 17 38 52 38 42 35 34 29 40 35 40 39 37 17 22 7 4 2 -
AM Peak 0815 - 0915 (164), AM PHF=0.79
Average Daily Traffic VolumesPrepared by: Southland Car Counters
Volumes for: Thursday, May 31, 2007 City: San Diego Project #:
Location: E San Ysidro Blvd fr Border Village Rd to Bolton Hall RdAM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB
00:00 6 11 12:00 112 12300:15 6 8 12:15 106 11200:30 8 16 12:30 142 12400:45 12 32 13 48 80 12:45 125 485 130 489 974
01:00 9 16 13:00 106 12801:15 2 11 13:15 107 11101:30 8 8 13:30 131 13401:45 3 22 12 47 69 13:45 114 458 128 501 959
02:00 8 10 14:00 116 14502:15 6 10 14:15 112 11902:30 4 7 14:30 105 13402:45 9 27 20 47 74 14:45 124 457 141 539 996
03:00 11 18 15:00 144 13603:15 5 19 15:15 120 16303:30 5 16 15:30 129 11903:45 7 28 12 65 93 15:45 134 527 147 565 1092
04:00 8 9 16:00 120 12304:15 19 20 16:15 128 12504:30 19 24 16:30 127 13204:45 24 70 27 80 150 16:45 137 512 137 517 1029
05:00 32 23 17:00 126 15005:15 27 41 17:15 138 13305:30 26 33 17:30 127 13005:45 30 115 35 132 247 17:45 117 508 133 546 1054
06:00 32 33 18:00 135 12106:15 37 30 18:15 125 13006:30 22 30 18:30 114 11406:45 28 119 34 127 246 18:45 108 482 105 470 952
07:00 33 27 19:00 110 10707:15 37 33 19:15 142 11307:30 41 44 19:30 96 9307:45 43 154 38 142 296 19:45 100 448 111 424 872
08:00 57 33 20:00 93 8608:15 65 49 20:15 59 7308:30 63 65 20:30 73 7708:45 89 274 55 202 476 20:45 56 281 71 307 588
09:00 81 71 21:00 46 6309:15 82 71 21:15 36 6309:30 101 80 21:30 35 5309:45 90 354 92 314 668 21:45 33 150 47 226 376
10:00 85 82 22:00 36 3810:15 94 90 22:15 26 3610:30 99 89 22:30 30 4110:45 104 382 88 349 731 22:45 22 114 21 136 250
11:00 99 125 23:00 21 1511:15 115 93 23:15 16 1711:30 127 131 23:30 15 1911:45 121 462 124 473 935 23:45 15 67 23 74 141
Total Vol. 2039 2026 4065 4489 4794 9283
NB SB EB WB Combined
6528 6820 13348
Split % 50.2% 49.8% 30.5% 48.4% 51.6% 69.5%
Peak Hour 11:45 11:30 11:45 16:30 14:30 15:00
Volume 481 490 964 528 574 1092P.H.F. 0.85 0.94 0.91 0.96 0.88 0.96
PMAM
Daily Totals
07-4108-013
APPENDIX B
Peak-Hour Intersection Level of Service Worksheets
San Ysidro Facility Existing1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 0 0 72 0 0 90Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.78Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 92 0 0 115PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 208 92 92vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 208 92 92tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 781 965 1502
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 0 92 115Volume Left 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1700 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.05 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 36 54 7 22 2 48 4 12 1 3 2Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 46 69 13 42 4 62 5 15 2 5 3
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 115 60 82 10Volume Left (vph) 0 13 62 2Volume Right (vph) 69 4 15 3Hadj (s) -0.33 0.04 0.07 -0.13Departure Headway (s) 3.8 4.3 4.3 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.12 0.07 0.10 0.01Capacity (veh/h) 908 820 791 809Control Delay (s) 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.3Approach Delay (s) 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.3Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 7.6HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 43 20 1 28 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 0.44 0.44Hourly flow rate (vph) 70 33 1 35 2 2PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 103 124 87vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 103 124 87tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1489 870 972
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 103 36 5Volume Left 0 1 2Volume Right 33 0 2cSH 1700 1489 918Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.00 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.9Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.9Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 3 41 26 0 0 3Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 71 45 0 0 5PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 45 126 45vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 45 126 45tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 99cM capacity (veh/h) 1563 866 1025
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 76 45 5Volume Left 5 0 0Volume Right 0 0 5cSH 1563 1700 1025Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.01Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 8.5Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 8.5Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 46 610 390 11 0 76Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 58 762 443 12 0 112PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.92vC, conflicting volume 456 946 228vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 456 855 228tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 95 100 86cM capacity (veh/h) 1101 259 775
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 58 381 381 295 160 112Volume Left 58 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 12 112cSH 1101 1700 1700 1700 1700 775Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.14Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 0 0 13Control Delay (s) 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 10.4Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3305 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3305 1770 1583Volume (vph) 226 365 0 0 237 187 74 0 110 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 294 474 0 0 296 234 95 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 79 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 294 474 0 0 340 0 0 95 62 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 25.5 11.2 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 25.5 11.2 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.43 0.19 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 591 1509 619 778 696v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.50 0.31 0.55 0.12 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 11.4 22.0 9.9 9.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.3Delay (s) 23.1 11.5 23.0 10.2 10.0Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.9 23.0 10.1 0.0Approach LOS B C B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Existing7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1550 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1550 1504Volume (vph) 0 411 118 45 287 0 0 0 0 211 2 203Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.81 0.81 0.81Adj. Flow (vph) 0 452 130 52 334 0 0 0 0 260 2 251RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 91Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 452 28 52 334 0 0 0 0 159 150 95Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 12.7 12.7 3.7 20.4 29.8 29.8 29.8Effective Green, g (s) 12.7 12.7 3.7 20.4 29.8 29.8 29.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.35 0.51 0.51 0.51Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 772 345 218 1240 861 794 770v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.02 c0.09 0.09 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.06v/c Ratio 0.59 0.08 0.24 0.27 0.18 0.19 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 20.4 18.1 25.9 13.6 7.7 7.7 7.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 21.5 18.2 26.5 13.7 7.8 7.8 7.7Level of Service C B C B A A AApproach Delay (s) 20.8 15.4 0.0 7.8Approach LOS C B A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.9 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31Actuated Cycle Length (s) 58.2 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Existing1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 0 0 126 0 0 175Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.25 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 185 0 0 257PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 443 185 185vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 443 185 185tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 572 857 1389
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 0 185 257Volume Left 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1700 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.11 0.15Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 12.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 4 113 58 27 60 3 63 5 17 4 8 3Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.67 0.67 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 130 67 40 88 4 71 6 19 6 12 4
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 201 132 96 22Volume Left (vph) 5 40 71 6Volume Right (vph) 67 4 19 4Hadj (s) -0.16 0.07 0.06 -0.03Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.7Degree Utilization, x 0.23 0.16 0.13 0.03Capacity (veh/h) 832 766 708 693Control Delay (s) 8.5 8.4 8.4 7.9Approach Delay (s) 8.5 8.4 8.4 7.9Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 8.4HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 35.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 109 51 6 73 22 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.73 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 124 58 8 100 25 3PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 182 269 153vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 182 269 153tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 97 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1393 716 893
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 182 108 28Volume Left 0 8 25Volume Right 58 0 3cSH 1700 1393 733Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.01 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 10.1Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 10.1Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 3 109 76 0 0 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 124 86 0 0 3PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 86 217 86vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 86 217 86tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1510 769 972
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 127 86 3Volume Left 3 0 0Volume Right 0 0 3cSH 1510 1700 972Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.05 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 8.7Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 8.7Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 70 926 927 23 0 78Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.25 0.80Hourly flow rate (vph) 74 975 1030 26 0 98PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.89vC, conflicting volume 1056 1678 528vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1056 1639 528tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 89 100 80cM capacity (veh/h) 655 72 495
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 74 487 487 687 369 98Volume Left 74 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 26 98cSH 655 1700 1700 1700 1700 495Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.22 0.20Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 0 18Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0Lane LOS B BApproach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 14.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Existing6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3273 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3273 1776 1583Volume (vph) 262 656 0 0 452 457 136 3 311 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 273 683 0 0 520 525 140 3 321 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 201 0 0 0 167 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 683 0 0 844 0 0 143 154 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 38.7 23.7 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 38.7 23.7 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.53 0.32 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 517 1876 1063 640 570v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.19 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.53 0.36 0.79 0.22 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 28.6 10.0 22.4 16.2 16.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.1 4.2 0.8 1.2Delay (s) 29.6 10.1 26.6 17.1 17.7Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.7 26.6 17.5 0.0Approach LOS B C B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Existing7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Volume (vph) 0 575 318 191 434 0 0 0 0 373 4 200Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 0 605 335 203 462 0 0 0 0 393 4 211RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 605 89 203 462 0 0 0 0 198 199 90Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 936 419 464 1620 716 688 641v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.06 0.13 0.12 c0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.06v/c Ratio 0.65 0.21 0.44 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 19.7 27.3 11.6 12.9 12.9 12.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5Delay (s) 24.0 20.0 28.0 11.7 13.1 13.2 12.5Level of Service C B C B B B BApproach Delay (s) 22.6 16.7 0.0 12.9Approach LOS C B A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 68.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 0 72 0 0 90Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.78Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 0 92 0 0 115PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 208 92 92vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 208 92 92tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 98 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 781 965 1502
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 13 92 115Volume Left 13 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 781 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.05 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 9.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS AApproach Delay (s) 9.7 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.6Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 36 64 2 22 2 48 4 17 1 3 2Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.50Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 46 82 4 42 4 69 6 24 2 6 4
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 128 50 99 12Volume Left (vph) 0 4 69 2Volume Right (vph) 82 4 24 4Hadj (s) -0.35 0.00 0.03 -0.13Departure Headway (s) 3.9 4.3 4.3 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.14 0.06 0.12 0.01Capacity (veh/h) 904 811 797 803Control Delay (s) 7.5 7.5 7.9 7.3Approach Delay (s) 7.5 7.5 7.9 7.3Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 7.6HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 23.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 48 20 1 23 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 0.44 0.44Hourly flow rate (vph) 79 33 1 28 2 2PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 111 126 95vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 111 126 95tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1478 868 962
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 111 30 5Volume Left 0 1 2Volume Right 33 0 2cSH 1700 1478 912Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.00 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.0Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 9.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 39 24 0 0 0Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 17 67 41 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 41 143 41vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 41 143 41tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1568 840 1030
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 84 41 0Volume Left 17 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1568 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.02 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 1.6 0.0 0.0Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 1.6 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 12.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 51 610 390 11 0 81Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 64 762 443 12 0 119PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.92vC, conflicting volume 456 958 228vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 456 868 228tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 94 100 85cM capacity (veh/h) 1101 253 775
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 64 381 381 295 160 119Volume Left 64 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 12 119cSH 1101 1700 1700 1700 1700 775Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.15Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 0 0 14Control Delay (s) 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 10.5Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3302 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3302 1770 1583Volume (vph) 226 370 0 0 237 192 74 0 110 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 294 481 0 0 296 240 95 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 195 0 0 0 79 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 294 481 0 0 341 0 0 95 62 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 25.6 11.3 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 25.6 11.3 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.43 0.19 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 590 1512 623 777 695v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.14 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.50 0.32 0.55 0.12 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 22.5 11.4 22.0 10.0 9.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.3Delay (s) 23.1 11.5 23.0 10.3 10.1Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.9 23.0 10.1 0.0Approach LOS B C B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.9 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1554 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1554 1504Volume (vph) 0 411 118 45 287 0 0 0 0 216 2 203Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.81 0.81 0.81Adj. Flow (vph) 0 452 130 52 334 0 0 0 0 267 2 251RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 90Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 452 28 52 334 0 0 0 0 157 160 97Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 12.9 3.7 20.6 30.8 30.8 30.8Effective Green, g (s) 12.9 12.9 3.7 20.6 30.8 30.8 30.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.35 0.52 0.52 0.52Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 769 344 214 1227 872 806 780v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.02 c0.09 0.09 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.06v/c Ratio 0.59 0.08 0.24 0.27 0.18 0.20 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 20.9 18.5 26.5 14.0 7.6 7.7 7.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 22.0 18.6 27.1 14.1 7.7 7.8 7.7Level of Service C B C B A A AApproach Delay (s) 21.3 15.9 0.0 7.7Approach LOS C B A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 0 126 0 0 175Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.25 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 15 0 185 0 0 257PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 443 185 185vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 443 185 185tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 572 857 1389
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 15 185 257Volume Left 15 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 572 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.11 0.15Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 4 113 68 22 60 3 63 5 22 4 8 3Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.67 0.67 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 130 78 32 88 4 71 6 25 6 12 4
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 213 125 101 22Volume Left (vph) 5 32 71 6Volume Right (vph) 78 4 25 4Hadj (s) -0.18 0.06 0.03 -0.03Departure Headway (s) 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.8Degree Utilization, x 0.25 0.16 0.13 0.03Capacity (veh/h) 835 762 712 690Control Delay (s) 8.5 8.3 8.4 7.9Approach Delay (s) 8.5 8.3 8.4 7.9Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection SummaryDelay 8.4HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 34.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 114 51 6 68 22 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.73 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 130 58 8 93 25 3PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 188 268 159vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 188 268 159tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 97 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1387 717 887
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 188 101 28Volume Left 0 8 25Volume Right 58 0 3cSH 1700 1387 734Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.01 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 10.1Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 10.1Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 107 74 0 0 0Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 122 84 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 84 228 84vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 84 228 84tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1513 754 975
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 133 84 0Volume Left 11 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1513 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.05 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 75 926 927 23 0 83Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.25 0.80Hourly flow rate (vph) 79 975 1030 26 0 104PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.89vC, conflicting volume 1056 1688 528vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1056 1651 528tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 88 100 79cM capacity (veh/h) 655 70 495
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 79 487 487 687 369 104Volume Left 79 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 26 104cSH 655 1700 1700 1700 1700 495Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.22 0.21Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 0 0 20Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2Lane LOS B BApproach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 14.2Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 1.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3271 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3271 1776 1583Volume (vph) 262 661 0 0 452 462 136 3 311 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 273 689 0 0 520 531 140 3 321 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 165 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 689 0 0 849 0 0 143 156 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 39.0 24.0 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 39.0 24.0 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.53 0.33 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 515 1883 1071 637 568v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.19 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.53 0.37 0.79 0.22 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 10.0 22.4 16.4 16.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.1 4.1 0.8 1.2Delay (s) 29.8 10.1 26.5 17.2 17.9Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.7 26.5 17.7 0.0Approach LOS B C B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.3 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Volume (vph) 0 575 318 191 434 0 0 0 0 378 4 200Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 0 605 335 203 462 0 0 0 0 398 4 211RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 605 89 203 462 0 0 0 0 200 202 90Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 936 419 464 1620 716 688 641v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.06 0.13 0.12 c0.13v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.06v/c Ratio 0.65 0.21 0.44 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 19.7 27.3 11.6 12.9 13.0 12.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5Delay (s) 24.0 20.0 28.0 11.7 13.1 13.2 12.5Level of Service C B C B B B BApproach Delay (s) 22.6 16.7 0.0 12.9Approach LOS C B A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43Actuated Cycle Length (s) 68.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 0 0 382 0 0 517Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.25 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 562 0 0 760PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1322 562 562vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1322 562 562tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 173 527 1010
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 0 562 760Volume Left 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1700 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.33 0.45Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 10 372 135 35 232 5 139 5 22 6 9 11Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.67 0.67 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 428 155 51 341 7 156 6 25 9 13 16
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 594 400 187 39Volume Left (vph) 11 51 156 9Volume Right (vph) 155 7 25 16Hadj (s) -0.12 0.05 0.12 -0.17Departure Headway (s) 5.2 5.6 6.7 6.9Degree Utilization, x 0.86 0.63 0.35 0.07Capacity (veh/h) 675 608 496 452Control Delay (s) 31.9 17.6 13.2 10.5Approach Delay (s) 31.9 17.6 13.2 10.5Approach LOS D C B B
Intersection SummaryDelay 23.7HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 197 187 50 127 81 33Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.73 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 224 212 68 174 91 37PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 436 641 330vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 436 641 330tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 94 78 95cM capacity (veh/h) 1123 412 711
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 436 242 128Volume Left 0 68 91Volume Right 212 0 37cSH 1700 1123 469Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.06 0.27Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 27Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.8 15.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.8 15.5Approach LOS C
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 3 227 174 0 0 3Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 258 198 0 0 3PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 198 462 198vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 198 462 198tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1375 556 843
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 261 198 3Volume Left 3 0 0Volume Right 0 0 3cSH 1375 1700 843Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.12 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.3Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 9.3Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 125 1270 1125 119 0 148Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.25 0.80Hourly flow rate (vph) 132 1337 1250 132 0 185PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.82vC, conflicting volume 1382 2248 691vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1382 2304 691tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 73 100 52cM capacity (veh/h) 492 19 387
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 132 668 668 833 549 185Volume Left 132 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 132 185cSH 492 1700 1700 1700 1700 387Volume to Capacity 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.32 0.48Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 0 0 0 0 63Control Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.5Lane LOS B CApproach Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 22.5Approach LOS C
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3299 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3299 1776 1583Volume (vph) 202 1016 0 0 698 575 102 2 379 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 210 1058 0 0 802 661 105 2 391 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 76 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 1058 0 0 1311 0 0 107 315 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.38 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 1976 1242 600 535v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.30 c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.47 0.54 1.06 0.18 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 31.0 10.7 24.0 18.0 21.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.3 41.5 0.6 4.7Delay (s) 31.8 11.0 65.5 18.6 25.8Level of Service C B E B CApproach Delay (s) 14.4 65.5 24.2 0.0Approach LOS B E C A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.1 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1615 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1615 1504Volume (vph) 0 855 316 213 629 0 0 0 0 413 3 197Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 0 900 333 227 669 0 0 0 0 435 3 207RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 900 111 227 669 0 0 0 0 218 220 78Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 25.8 25.8 10.4 40.2 29.3 29.3 29.3Effective Green, g (s) 25.8 25.8 10.4 40.2 29.3 29.3 29.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.52 0.38 0.38 0.38Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1178 527 461 1836 636 611 569v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 c0.07 0.19 0.13 c0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.05v/c Ratio 0.76 0.21 0.49 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 23.1 18.5 31.1 11.1 17.2 17.4 15.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5Delay (s) 26.1 18.7 31.9 11.2 17.5 17.7 16.3Level of Service C B C B B B BApproach Delay (s) 24.1 16.4 0.0 17.2Approach LOS C B A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 0 216 0 0 253Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.78Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 0 277 0 0 324PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 601 277 277vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 601 277 277tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 97 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 463 762 1286
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 13 277 324Volume Left 13 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 463 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.16 0.19Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 13.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 13.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 138 125 1 91 4 120 6 12 3 3 5Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 177 160 2 175 8 154 8 15 5 5 9
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 337 185 177 19Volume Left (vph) 0 2 154 5Volume Right (vph) 160 8 15 9Hadj (s) -0.25 0.01 0.16 -0.18Departure Headway (s) 4.4 4.9 5.3 5.2Degree Utilization, x 0.41 0.25 0.26 0.03Capacity (veh/h) 772 699 626 593Control Delay (s) 10.5 9.4 10.1 8.4Approach Delay (s) 10.5 9.4 10.1 8.4Approach LOS B A B A
Intersection SummaryDelay 10.1HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 35.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 86 74 10 52 4 6Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 0.44 0.44Hourly flow rate (vph) 141 121 12 64 9 14PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 262 291 202vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 262 291 202tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 99 98cM capacity (veh/h) 1302 694 839
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 262 77 23Volume Left 0 12 9Volume Right 121 0 14cSH 1700 1302 774Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.01 0.03Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 2Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 9.8Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 9.8Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 8 84 64 0 0 0Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 145 110 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 110 283 110vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 110 283 110tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1480 701 943
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 159 110 0Volume Left 14 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1480 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.06 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 0.0Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.7 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.4Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 85 610 448 30 0 147Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 106 762 509 34 0 216PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.88vC, conflicting volume 543 1120 272vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 543 997 272tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 90 100 70cM capacity (veh/h) 1022 189 726
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 106 381 381 339 204 216Volume Left 106 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 34 216cSH 1022 1700 1700 1700 1700 726Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.12 0.30Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 0 31Control Delay (s) 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 1.1 0.0 12.0Approach LOS B
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3329 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3329 1770 1583Volume (vph) 218 566 0 0 359 236 67 0 129 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 283 735 0 0 449 295 86 0 165 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 100 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 283 735 0 0 612 0 0 86 65 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.7 32.3 17.6 26.4 26.4Effective Green, g (s) 10.7 32.3 17.6 26.4 26.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.48 0.26 0.40 0.40Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 551 1714 878 701 627v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.21 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.51 0.43 0.70 0.12 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 25.6 11.2 22.1 12.8 12.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.2 2.4 0.4 0.3Delay (s) 26.4 11.4 24.6 13.2 13.0Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.6 24.6 13.1 0.0Approach LOS B C B A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 18.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38Actuated Cycle Length (s) 66.7 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1559 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1559 1504Volume (vph) 0 587 119 47 410 0 0 0 0 235 2 218Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.81 0.81 0.81Adj. Flow (vph) 0 645 131 55 477 0 0 0 0 290 2 269RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 107Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 645 35 55 477 0 0 0 0 168 171 99Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 16.8 16.8 3.7 24.5 30.0 30.0 30.0Effective Green, g (s) 16.8 16.8 3.7 24.5 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.06 0.39 0.48 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 951 426 203 1387 807 748 722v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.02 c0.13 0.10 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.07v/c Ratio 0.68 0.08 0.27 0.34 0.21 0.23 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 20.4 17.1 28.1 13.4 9.4 9.5 9.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4Delay (s) 22.4 17.2 28.8 13.5 9.5 9.7 9.4Level of Service C B C B A A AApproach Delay (s) 21.5 15.1 0.0 9.5Approach LOS C B A A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.1 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40Actuated Cycle Length (s) 62.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 10 0 382 0 0 517Peak Hour Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.25 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 15 0 562 0 0 760PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1322 562 562vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1322 562 562tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 91 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 173 527 1010
Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 15 562 760Volume Left 15 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 173 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.33 0.45Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0Control Delay (s) 27.8 0.0 0.0Lane LOS DApproach Delay (s) 27.8 0.0 0.0Approach LOS D
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.2% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 10 372 145 30 232 5 139 5 27 6 9 11Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.67 0.67 0.67Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 428 167 44 341 7 156 6 30 9 13 16
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 606 393 192 39Volume Left (vph) 11 44 156 9Volume Right (vph) 167 7 30 16Hadj (s) -0.13 0.05 0.10 -0.17Departure Headway (s) 5.2 5.7 6.7 7.0Degree Utilization, x 0.88 0.62 0.36 0.08Capacity (veh/h) 675 604 499 451Control Delay (s) 34.2 17.5 13.4 10.5Approach Delay (s) 34.2 17.5 13.4 10.5Approach LOS D C B B
Intersection SummaryDelay 24.9HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 202 187 50 122 81 33Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.73 0.89 0.89Hourly flow rate (vph) 230 212 68 167 91 37PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 442 640 336vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 442 640 336tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 94 78 95cM capacity (veh/h) 1118 413 706
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 442 236 128Volume Left 0 68 91Volume Right 212 0 37cSH 1700 1118 469Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.06 0.27Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 27Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.9 15.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.9 15.5Approach LOS C
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.3Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.8% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 8 227 174 0 0 0Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88Hourly flow rate (vph) 9 258 198 0 0 0PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 198 474 198vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 198 474 198tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 99 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1375 546 843
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 267 198 0Volume Left 9 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1375 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.12 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.3 0.0 0.0Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.3 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 130 1270 1125 119 0 153Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.25 0.80Hourly flow rate (vph) 137 1337 1250 132 0 191PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.81vC, conflicting volume 1382 2258 691vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1382 2317 691tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 72 100 51cM capacity (veh/h) 492 19 387
Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 137 668 668 833 549 191Volume Left 137 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 132 191cSH 492 1700 1700 1700 1700 387Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.32 0.49Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 0 0 0 0 66Control Delay (s) 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1Lane LOS C CApproach Delay (s) 1.4 0.0 23.1Approach LOS C
Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3298 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3298 1776 1583Volume (vph) 202 1021 0 0 698 580 102 2 379 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 210 1064 0 0 802 667 105 2 391 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 76 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 1064 0 0 1316 0 0 107 315 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.38 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 1976 1242 600 535v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.30 c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.47 0.54 1.06 0.18 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 31.0 10.7 24.0 18.0 21.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.3 42.8 0.6 4.7Delay (s) 31.8 11.0 66.8 18.6 25.8Level of Service C B E B CApproach Delay (s) 14.5 66.8 24.3 0.0Approach LOS B E C A
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM
K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1615 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1615 1504Volume (vph) 0 855 316 213 629 0 0 0 0 418 3 197Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 0 900 333 227 669 0 0 0 0 440 3 207RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 900 111 227 669 0 0 0 0 221 222 78Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 25.8 25.8 10.4 40.2 29.3 29.3 29.3Effective Green, g (s) 25.8 25.8 10.4 40.2 29.3 29.3 29.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.52 0.38 0.38 0.38Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1178 527 461 1836 636 611 569v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 c0.07 0.19 0.13 c0.14v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.05v/c Ratio 0.76 0.21 0.49 0.36 0.35 0.36 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 23.1 18.5 31.1 11.1 17.3 17.4 15.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5Delay (s) 26.1 18.7 31.9 11.2 17.6 17.7 16.3Level of Service C B C B B B BApproach Delay (s) 24.1 16.4 0.0 17.2Approach LOS C B A B
Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
APPENDIX C
SANDAG’s 2030 Forecast
APPENDIX D
7-Day Classification Counts
MetroCount Traffic Executive Vehicle Counts
Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - ENTERING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 82 / 215 (38.14%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=15, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
AM Peak 0745 - 0845 (3), AM PHF=0.38 PM Peak 1315 - 1415 (2), PM PHF=0.50
* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Total=11, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
AM Peak 0500 - 0600 (2), AM PHF=0.50 PM Peak 2315 - 2415 (4), PM PHF=0.33
* Thursday, July 16, 2009 - Total=22, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
3 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0000 - 0100 (3), AM PHF=0.25 PM Peak 1315 - 1415 (4), PM PHF=0.50
* Friday, July 17, 2009 - Total=17, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0700 - 0800 (3), AM PHF=0.75 PM Peak 1615 - 1715 (4), PM PHF=0.50
* Saturday, July 18, 2009 - Total=0, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0000 - 0100 (0), AM PHF=1.00 PM Peak 1200 - 1300 (0), PM PHF=1.00
* Sunday, July 19, 2009 - Total=1, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0315 - 0415 (1), AM PHF=0.25 PM Peak 1200 - 1300 (0), PM PHF=1.00
* Monday, July 20, 2009 - Total=16, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
AM Peak 0845 - 0945 (3), AM PHF=0.38
MetroCount Traffic Executive Vehicle Counts
Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - EXITING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 83 / 215 (38.60%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=20, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
1 3 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0715 - 0815 (4), AM PHF=0.50 PM Peak 1200 - 1300 (2), PM PHF=0.25
* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Total=9, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0545 - 0645 (2), AM PHF=0.50 PM Peak 1700 - 1800 (3), PM PHF=0.75
* Thursday, July 16, 2009 - Total=19, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0000 - 0100 (2), AM PHF=0.50 PM Peak 1345 - 1445 (3), PM PHF=0.25
* Friday, July 17, 2009 - Total=21, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0
AM Peak 0715 - 0815 (3), AM PHF=0.38 PM Peak 1615 - 1715 (3), PM PHF=0.38
* Saturday, July 18, 2009 - Total=0, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0000 - 0100 (0), AM PHF=1.00 PM Peak 1200 - 1300 (0), PM PHF=1.00
* Sunday, July 19, 2009 - Total=1, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM Peak 0345 - 0445 (1), AM PHF=0.25 PM Peak 1200 - 1300 (0), PM PHF=1.00
* Monday, July 20, 2009 - Total=13, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 -
AM Peak 0830 - 0930 (2), AM PHF=0.50
MetroCount Traffic Executive Daily Classes
DailyClass-1637 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - ENTERING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 82 / 215 (38.14%)
Daily Classes DailyClass-1637 Site: 9056.01.0SN Description: TRAIN YARD DRWY Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Filter: Cls(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) Dir(N) Sp(5,100) Headway(>0) Tuesday, July 14, 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total
Tue 1 6 4 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15
(%) 6.7 40.0 26.7 0.0 13.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wed 0 5 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11
(%) 0.0 45.5 27.3 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thu 1 7 4 0 6 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 22
(%) 4.5 31.8 18.2 0.0 27.3 9.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fri 0 6 7 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 17
(%) 0.0 35.3 41.2 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sun 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mon 2 5 6 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16
(%) 12.5 31.3 37.5 0.0 6.3 6.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MetroCount Traffic Executive Daily Classes
DailyClass-1638 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - EXITING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 83 / 215 (38.60%)
Daily Classes DailyClass-1638 Site: 9056.01.0SN Description: TRAIN YARD DRWY Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Filter: Cls(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) Dir(S) Sp(5,100) Headway(>0) Monday, July 13, 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total
Tue 1 8 6 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20
(%) 5.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wed 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9
(%) 0.0 33.3 22.2 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thu 1 4 7 0 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19
(%) 5.3 21.1 36.8 0.0 21.1 10.5 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fri 3 7 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 21
(%) 14.3 33.3 23.8 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sun 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mon 1 7 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13
(%) 7.7 53.8 15.4 0.0 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
APPENDIX E
Speed Data
MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed
SpeedText-1620 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton)
Column Legend: 0 [Time] 24-hour time (0000 - 2359) 1 [Total] Number in time step 2 [Vbin] Speed bin totals 3 [Mean] Average speed 4 [Vpp] Percentile speed
* Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -
0015 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.1 -
0030 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.6 -
0045 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 41.1 -
0100 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.7 -
0115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 -
0130 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 -
0145 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 -
0200 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.3 -
0215 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.9 -
0230 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 -
0245 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 -
0300 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.1 -
0315 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 -
0330 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 -
0345 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 -
0400 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.4 -
0415 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 -
0430 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 44.1
0445 9 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 -
0500 10 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 -
0515 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.9 -
0530 10 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 -
0545 18 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 39.0 43.8
0600 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 40.1 46.8
0615 13 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 40.5 47.4
0630 19 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 42.7
0645 17 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.6 42.5
0700 20 0 0 0 2 3 6 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 40.0
0715 30 0 0 0 1 6 7 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 41.6
0730 37 0 0 1 2 4 10 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 43.4
0745 38 0 0 0 3 1 11 11 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 36.8 42.9
[9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND
* Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
0800 23 0 0 0 0 1 6 11 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 41.4
0815 39 0 0 0 0 3 12 9 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.8 43.6
0830 35 0 0 0 1 4 14 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 41.8
0845 52 0 0 0 1 7 15 17 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 40.9
0900 38 0 0 1 0 1 6 21 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 40.7
0915 30 0 0 0 0 3 8 10 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 45.6
0930 30 0 0 0 0 4 10 7 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 47.0
0945 38 0 0 0 0 6 11 11 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 44.3
1000 22 0 0 0 1 1 5 8 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.7 45.2
1015 29 0 0 0 0 7 3 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.2
1030 31 0 0 0 2 4 7 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 42.3
1045 42 0 1 0 4 16 10 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 38.3
1100 42 0 0 0 3 9 10 15 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 39.4
1115 24 1 0 0 0 6 6 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 41.2
1130 42 0 0 0 1 5 12 21 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 39.1
1145 35 0 0 0 0 8 12 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 41.6
1200 34 1 0 0 1 6 7 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 39.4
1215 40 0 0 0 4 6 11 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.3
1230 41 0 0 0 3 5 15 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.0 42.1
1245 34 0 0 0 1 4 12 12 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 39.6
1300 41 0 0 0 0 8 19 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 37.6
1315 34 0 1 0 3 5 8 8 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 42.3
1330 33 0 0 0 1 3 18 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 37.6
1345 29 0 0 0 0 1 17 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 40.9
1400 37 0 0 1 0 1 12 15 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 36.9 40.5
1415 28 0 0 0 2 4 6 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.9 39.8
1430 31 0 0 0 1 10 6 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.9
1445 40 0 0 0 2 4 15 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 39.4
1500 41 0 0 0 2 4 14 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 38.7
1515 38 0 0 2 7 11 11 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 34.9
1530 40 0 0 1 5 12 12 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 35.8
1545 35 0 0 0 1 4 13 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.6
1600 52 0 1 0 1 4 17 17 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 41.2
1615 38 0 0 0 1 0 13 9 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 42.9
1630 37 0 0 1 3 3 15 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 37.8
1645 40 0 0 0 4 5 13 8 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 42.9
1700 45 0 0 0 1 10 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 37.1
1715 41 0 0 1 1 4 20 8 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.0
1730 40 0 0 0 0 5 14 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 39.4
1745 39 0 0 0 0 5 15 7 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.8
1800 49 0 0 0 2 11 14 14 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 40.0
1815 55 0 0 0 2 12 16 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 38.9
1830 55 0 0 0 1 9 22 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.9
1845 37 0 0 1 1 7 7 14 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 40.5
1900 21 0 0 1 3 6 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 40.0
1915 31 0 0 1 1 4 7 14 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 39.6
1930 36 0 0 0 1 7 11 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.1 42.1
1945 17 0 0 0 2 5 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 37.8
2000 27 0 0 0 1 6 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.8 37.8
2015 28 0 0 0 2 5 8 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 40.0
2030 19 0 0 0 1 2 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.7
2045 22 0 0 0 1 4 4 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 40.9
2100 13 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 43.2
2115 16 0 0 1 0 2 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 38.5
2130 16 0 0 0 1 0 6 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.2 44.5
2145 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.7 -
2200 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.9 -
2215 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.5 41.4
2230 12 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 39.1
2245 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 -
2300 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -
2315 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.6 -
2330 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.7 -
2345 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -
Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
07-19 1781 2 3 9 71 262 563 519 261 83 7 0 1 0 0 0 34.9 40.9
06-22 2094 2 3 12 86 314 641 618 307 99 11 0 1 0 0 0 34.9 40.9
06-00 2147 2 3 12 86 318 654 642 318 100 11 0 1 0 0 0 35.0 40.9
00-00 2255 2 3 12 87 331 681 675 339 110 13 1 1 0 0 0 35.1 41.2
In profile: Vehicles = 2255 / 6854 (32.90%)
MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed
SpeedText-1619 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton)
Column Legend: 0 [Time] 24-hour time (0000 - 2359) 1 [Total] Number in time step 2 [Vbin] Speed bin totals 3 [Mean] Average speed 4 [Vpp] Percentile speed
* Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
0000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 -
0015 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.2 -
0030 7 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 -
0045 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 -
0100 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 -
0115 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.1 -
0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -
0145 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 -
0200 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 -
0215 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 -
0230 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 -
0245 5 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 -
0300 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.6 -
0315 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 -
0330 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.9 -
0345 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -
0400 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -
0415 4 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.4 -
0430 6 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -
0445 5 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -
0500 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 -
0515 6 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 -
0530 7 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 -
0545 14 0 0 0 2 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.2 36.5
0600 12 0 1 0 0 3 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 38.9
0615 9 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 -
0630 9 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 -
0645 10 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 -
0700 11 0 0 0 2 3 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 39.8
0715 20 0 0 0 1 5 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 37.1
0730 25 0 0 0 2 9 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 36.5
0745 47 0 0 0 5 8 10 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 40.9
[9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
0800 53 0 0 0 3 10 22 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.1
0815 44 0 0 0 0 7 21 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 36.9
0830 40 0 0 0 3 5 17 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 37.6
0845 37 0 0 0 3 7 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.5
0900 51 0 0 1 5 13 16 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 37.4
0915 29 0 0 0 0 9 8 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 41.6
0930 14 0 0 0 0 4 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.5 38.9
0945 21 0 0 0 1 2 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 38.7
1000 16 0 0 0 2 6 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 36.9
1015 17 0 0 0 1 4 5 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.4
1030 19 0 0 0 1 4 8 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 39.8
1045 21 0 1 1 2 7 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 34.9
1100 31 2 0 5 3 12 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 35.3
1115 21 0 0 0 0 1 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 37.6
1130 26 0 0 1 3 5 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.4 37.6
1145 22 0 0 0 2 4 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 36.9
1200 30 0 0 0 1 9 10 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 39.1
1215 15 0 0 0 3 3 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 38.7
1230 20 0 0 0 1 9 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 35.8
1245 29 0 0 0 1 2 14 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 39.1
1300 25 0 0 0 0 6 8 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 36.2
1315 23 0 0 0 1 5 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 34.9
1330 27 0 0 1 3 4 11 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.5
1345 26 0 0 0 0 5 13 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.0 36.9
1400 23 0 0 0 1 4 8 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 40.0
1415 25 0 0 0 2 4 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.0 38.5
1430 29 0 0 0 0 9 13 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 39.1
1445 34 0 0 1 6 10 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 35.8
1500 30 0 0 0 1 3 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.8 37.6
1515 22 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.8 37.4
1530 38 0 1 3 5 11 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 32.4
1545 36 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 40.0
1600 34 0 0 0 0 9 17 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.6
1615 36 0 0 0 0 7 13 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 38.7
1630 36 0 0 0 1 7 11 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 40.3
1645 34 0 0 0 2 8 14 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.7
1700 37 0 0 0 2 6 12 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 38.5
1715 46 0 0 1 1 5 19 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 38.5
1730 46 0 0 0 3 10 18 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.9
1745 31 0 0 0 1 6 10 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 39.4
1800 32 0 0 0 1 6 8 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 38.0
1815 32 0 0 0 0 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 37.6
1830 33 0 0 0 2 5 17 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 37.4
1845 26 0 0 0 0 5 7 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.5
1900 20 0 0 0 1 5 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 39.6
1915 32 1 0 0 2 3 10 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 38.5
1930 30 0 0 0 4 4 10 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 38.9
1945 30 0 0 0 1 6 14 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 39.1
2000 27 0 0 0 6 3 11 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.6 37.6
2015 28 0 0 1 3 9 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 36.9
2030 21 0 0 0 1 4 9 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33.6 36.9
2045 13 0 0 0 0 5 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 37.6
2100 14 0 0 0 1 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 35.3
2115 21 0 0 0 1 9 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.8 33.8
2130 12 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 38.5
2145 15 0 0 0 1 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 36.2
2200 10 0 0 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 -
2215 12 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.1 37.4
2230 13 0 0 0 1 3 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.5 39.8
2245 19 0 0 0 0 2 10 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 39.4
2300 8 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 -
2315 9 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 -
2330 7 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 -
2345 6 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.8 -
Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
07-19 1420 2 2 14 79 297 528 371 113 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3
06-22 1723 3 3 15 100 361 644 449 131 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3
06-00 1807 3 3 15 103 373 681 468 143 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3
00-00 1911 3 4 17 113 390 713 502 148 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3
In profile: Vehicles = 1911 / 6854 (27.88%)