seasonal forecasting - the 2nd asia-pacific water summitfirst of all, this figure shows...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Seasonal Forecasting ‐ Three(3) topics on 2011 rainfall ‐
Shinjiro KANAEDepartment of Civil EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyo Institute of Technology
1
![Page 2: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
First of All, This Figure shows Flooding under Global Warming
(Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5difference between 2071‐2100 and 1971‐2000)difference between 2071‐2100 and 1971‐2000)
IncreaseIntensified
DecreaseIntensified
Seasonal‐scale rainfall prediction is very important!!
![Page 3: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Shinjiro Kanae*1, Yukiko Imada*1, Masahide Kimoto*2
*1 Tokyo Institute of Technology*2 Atomosphere and Ocean Research Institute
3
3
![Page 4: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tool GCM Tool – GCM --Global‐scale numerical Climate ModelAtmosphere‐Ocean Coupled Model
B d diti I iti l ditiBoundary condition, Initial condition
Global Climateex.) wind direction: m/s
rainfall : mm/dayrainfall : mm/daySST (sea surface temp.)
![Page 5: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background
We utilized a seasonal prediction system: We utilized a seasonal prediction system: atmosphere and ocean coupled GCM, MIROCatmosphere and ocean coupled GCM, MIROC
1979‐2011 hindcast
ENSO predictionENSO prediction
hi d f AEnsemble meanEnsemble members
hindcast from Aug. Observation
Predictable largePredictable large‐‐scale SSTscale SST
ProbremProbrem I ffi i t ti lI ffi i t ti l
2011 Oct. rainfall [mm/day]
ProbremProbrem…… Insufficient spatial Insufficient spatial resolutionresolution SST anomaly correlation of
3‐month forecast from Aug.
Need for downscaling with Need for downscaling with new predictor instead of new predictor instead of
GCM i it tiGCM i it ti
Difficulty to predict RainfallDifficulty to predict Rainfall
GCM precipitationGCM precipitation
5GCM prediction Satellite Obs.
Rainfall anomaly correlation of 3‐month forecast from Aug.
![Page 6: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Concept
Concepts/Ideas
T i l SST Utilize the advantage of GCM High predictability in High predictability in
largelarge‐‐scale tropical SSTscale tropical SST
Tropical SST as predictor
Utilize statistical relationships (SST and Rainfall) supported by each physical mechanism.
SVD analysis※Singular Value DecompositionSingular Value Decomposition:
derive dominant patterns beginning at the largest covariance g g g
between two variables
INPUTINPUT
Rainfall
INPUTINPUT
・・・
・・・
Predicted SST by GCM Rainfall
D li iD li iOUTPUTOUTPUT
6
Downscaling using Downscaling using statistical relationship statistical relationship derived by derived by SVD analysisSVD analysis
![Page 7: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SVD analysis
Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) analysis
,( )×1st mode
Local rainfall historical data
Large scale SST historical data,( )=
( )
( )×+
,( )×+2nd mode Spatial Time
7
・・・
Spatial pattern
Time variation
![Page 8: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Relationship between local IndoChina rainfall and tropical SST (Aug Sep Oct)
Observed statistical relationship (SST and Rainfall)
1st mode (15.2%)
Relationship between local IndoChina rainfall and tropical SST (Aug‐Sep‐Oct)
Ocean reanalysis HOcean reanalysis dataset by Ishii and Kimoto (2009)
COR=0.743HENSOEl Nino/Southern Oscillation
Large‐scale SST
l
2nd mode (12.4%)
SVDSVDRegional Rainfall
St ti bCOR=0.764New‐type ENSO
Station base APHRODITE dataset
・・
・・
・・Nth mode SST
8
・ ・ ・Prcp
[K] [mm/day]
![Page 9: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Seasonal Rainfall Forecast by SVD (+GCM)STEP1
SVD2SVD analysis for observed/past datasets
STEP1
Sea surface temperature
SVD1
STEP2
Regional rainfall (12.9%)
Estimate the temporal coefficient for prediction
STEP2
← 2n
← Nth m
o
?
STEP3 Predicted SST by GCM
← 1st m
od
d mode
ode
Prediction of rainfall
STEP3 Predicted SST by GCM de
9Predictand
![Page 10: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Prediction for 2011 AugAug‐‐OctOct Thailand flood year
Observation GCM 1‐3 month prediction
Predictor: 1st–3rd month GCM hindcast of SST started from Aug 2011Aug 2011
10Satellite observation
(GSMaP)SVD (New Method)1‐3 month prediction
GCM original output1‐3 month prediction
![Page 11: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Prediction for 2011 MayMay‐‐Jul Jul Thailand flood year
Observation GCM 1‐3 month prediction
Predictor: 1st–3rd month GCM hindcast of SST started from May 2011May 2011
11Satellite observation
(GSMaP)SVD (New Method)1‐3 month prediction
GCM original output1‐3 month prediction
![Page 12: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Discussion – Is 2011 prediction an easy case or not? –
Observed SST anomaly 2011 Aug‐OctSST pattern of SVD #7
SVD7 dominant yearsSVD7 dominant years
Probably, there is a year/season easy for prediction.There is also a year/season difficult for prediction.y / p
Such information on the reliability of prediction is12
Such information on the reliability of prediction is required, and examined in near future.
![Page 13: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Summary 1Summary 1• Current status of seasonal rainfall forecast byCurrent status of seasonal rainfall forecast by an atmos‐ocean coupled model + SVD.
• Some results are good some result are notSome results are good, some result are not good. Probably there is a year/season easy for predictionProbably, there is a year/season easy for prediction, and there is also a year/season difficult for prediction.
• Seasonal prediction is still a big challengeSeasonal prediction is still a big challenge. But, there is a hope. 13
![Page 14: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2 The number of tropical cyclones2. The number of tropical cyclones during La Nina years
by a Stochastic Typhoon Model (STM)
Shinjiro KANAE, Keisuke KUSUHARA, Yoshihiko Iseri
![Page 15: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Impact of Typhoon in Thailand (2011)
4: HAIMA 8: NOCK‐TEN 17: NESAT 18: HAITANG 19: NALGAE
There are 5 typhoons that attacked or reached near by Thailand.
6/21 ‐ 6/25 7/26 ‐ 7/31 9/24 ‐ 9/30 9/25 ‐ 9/27 9/27 ‐ 10/05
985 hPa 984 hPa 950 hPa 996 hPa 935 hPa40 knots 50 knots 80 knots 35 knots 95 knots
The number of typhoons to Thailand ‐ Average is 1.5‐ only 3 years (1964 1971 1972)only 3 years (1964, 1971, 1972)→ more than 5 landfalls‐ 1964, 1971 are La Nina years
The impact of La Nina ?1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2010
96 , 9 a e a a yea s
15
![Page 16: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Stochastic Typhoon Model (STM)
End condition :l l i
Based on the observed typhoon track data of JMA
End condition :P >1020hPa, go into no observed area
cyclolysis Current conditions are calculated from previous conditions and the variation from the previous plocation, like a recurrence formula.
Si(x, y) x : longitude ; y : latitudei : time series
ΔS(x, y)i : time series
for each 6 hoursS : The value of typhoon
components P V and θSi‐1(x, y)1°
y
components P, V and θΔs : the variation at the grid
cyclogenesis1°
x
yFigure5. Modeled translation of typhoon.
Time step : 6 hours 16
![Page 17: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Simulation for on10,000 years, for example
2011/2/1517
![Page 18: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
b dValidation
STMObserved
For 60 years (1951 – 2010) For 60 years out of 10000 years
Typhoon tracksTyphoon tracks are similar to observed tracksCentral pressure pis reproduced nicely.
Validation of Central Pressure
Model outputs agree well with observed data.
18
![Page 19: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
STM Result (= number of typhoon passing per year)
La Nina Normal
Obser ation (2011)Observation (2011)
19
![Page 20: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Number of Typhoons during La Nina yearsLa NinaNormal
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
La NinaNormal The annual number of typhoon
0
which attacks Thailand ‐ La Nina 2.13N l 1 42‐ Normal 1.42
5 typhoons in Thailand, 2011
200 1 2 3 4 5~
5 typhoons in Thailand, 2011→ rare event (4%)
![Page 21: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Summary 2Summary 2• Application of Stochastic Typhoon Model for LaApplication of Stochastic Typhoon Model for La Nina years. (= 2.1/year, La Nina year)
• The number of 2011’s typhoons to Thailand (=5) is large in a statistical sense.
• We need further investigation “why 5 in 2011?”
• We are trying further improvements in the y g pmodeling.
21
![Page 22: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
3. Event Attribution of 2011 Rainfall2011 Rainfall
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/08/severe_flooding_in_pakistan.html
Shinjiro KANAE, Kouhei HAMAGUCHI, Yukiko IMADA, and many colleagues
![Page 23: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION23
Objective : Quantify climate change contribution to extreme heavy rainfall in 2011
C h b bili f f i f llCompare the probability of occurrence of rainfallUnder WithoutUnder
climate changeWithout
climate change v.s.
![Page 24: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24 INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION
EVENT ATTRIBUTIONEVENT ATTRIBUTION
Attribution of Climate‐related Events(ACE project)(ACE project)
England American JAPAN Group GroupGroup
[Schiermeier,2011]
Dataset from the Japanese GroupDataset from the Japanese Group
![Page 25: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Tool25 INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION
ToolAtmospheric General Circulation Model
Boundary condition, Initial condition Sea Surface Temperature, Sea ice ,etc.
Atmospheric Variablespex.) wind direction: m/s
rainfall : mm/dayrainfall : mm/day
![Page 26: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SIMULATION DESIGN26 INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION
SIMULATION DESIGNNAME 62yr 2011 Non‐CC 2011
Data source: Shiogama et al., 2013
1950‐2011(62 years)
2011 (1 year)
2011 (1 year)Period
Climate change
l b l
Climate change
l b l
Climate change
l b lClimate
Natural Variability Natural Variability Natural Variability
10 sets 100 sets 100 setsDatasetb 10 sets 100 sets 100 setsnumber
62 years period periodmm/day 1950 ・・・ 2011No.1 ‐0.2 ・・・ 0.8No.2 2.7 ・・・ ‐1.6
mm/day 2011No.1 ‐1.1No.2 1.0
mm/day 2011No.1 0.5No.2 ‐0.1as
etmbe
r
620 100 100 ・・・No.10 ‐1.7 ・・・ 2.6
・・・No.100 2.7
・・・No.10 1.3Da
tanu
m samples samples samples
![Page 27: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Generate histograms27 INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION
Generate histograms62yr 2011 Non‐CC 2011
Climate change Climate change Climate change
Natural Variability Natural Variability Natural Variability
620 100 100
ce
ty(%
) 620 samples
100 samples
100 samples
curren
obabilit
Differences in histogram appears !
Occ
pro appears !
RAINFALL (e.g. mm/day)
![Page 28: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2011 VS Non CC 201128 INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION
2011 VS Non‐CC 20112011 Non‐CC 20112011 Non CC 2011
Climate change Climate change
Natural Variabilityfor 1 year
Natural Variabilityfor 1 year
??????
![Page 29: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Method –concept of FAR
INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULT SUMMARY&DISCUSSION29
Method –concept of FAR
FAR* of the specific factor is defined as (RA‐RN)/RAFAR of the specific factor is defined as (RA RN)/RA* Fraction of Attributable Risk
e.g.) occurrence rate of cancerOccurrence rateOccurrence rate Occurrence rate NON-SMOKER :SMOKER :
RN=15%RA=75% 5%5%
CANCER is attributable to Smoking by 80 %.
![Page 30: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Result of Event Attributionf 2011 Th i R i f ll
Simulation name Ensemble number
2011 (ALL) A h i d N l ff i 2011 100
for 2011 Thai Rainfall2011 (ALL) Anthropogenic and Natural effects in 2011 100
NonCC 2011 (NAT) Natural effects (anthropogenic effect is removed) in 2011 100
62yr (LONG) Simulations from 1950 to 2011 under realistic condition 10
March/April April to October0.40.45
0.40.45
0.20.250.30.35
0.20.250.3
0.35
obability
10 grids
00.050.10.15
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.50
0.050.1
0.15
3 3 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 次の級mm/day/month
Pro 10 grids
So far there is no apparent signal due to climate change
ALL NAT LONG
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 次の級
ALL NAT LONG
mm/day/month
So far, there is no apparent signal due to climate change. But, it is also sure that we need more investigation.
![Page 31: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Final Concluding Remarksg• Seasonal‐scale prediction of rainfall and Event Attribution of seasonal rainfall are bothEvent‐Attribution of seasonal rainfall are both big challenges.
• But, there is hope. Progress is here.31
• Under global warming, flooding is projected to i ifi tl i i A i P ifisignificantly increase in Asia‐Pacific. Seasonal prediction is becoming very important!
• In the next step of research, these rainfall predictions should be used forthese rainfall predictions should be used for hydrological/flood predictions like Prof. Oki’s.
![Page 32: Seasonal Forecasting - the 2nd Asia-Pacific Water SummitFirst of All, This Figure shows Floodingunder Global Warming (Median of 11 GCMs under the extreme future scenario, RCP 8.5 differencedifference](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022041820/5e5d38f8b9d725675d713af6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Thank you for your attention !!Thank you for your attention !!
32