section iv to field (dub) - international perforating forum · section iv to field (dub) dennis j....
TRANSCRIPT
Section IV to Field (DUB)Section IV to Field (DUB)
Dennis J. Haggerty, JRC-Halliburton Cam Le, Halliburton
MENAPS-11-23
Static vs. Dynamic
Defining Dynamic Underbalance (DUB)
2© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Pwellbore
Pwellbore
Max UB Surge
Preservoir
Pre
ssur
e
Time
Max UB Surge
Preservoir
MENAPS-11-23
Customer Challenge
� Injector well� Initial Well Parameters
– ~ 6000 psi BHP– ~ 190 F BHT– ~ 450 md
3© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
– ~ 25% Ф– ~ 20,900 ft MD TVD– ~ 3,850 ft Water Depth– ~ 3500 psi Overbalanced by Seawater
MENAPS-11-23
Customer Challenge
� Zinc or Steel– Which would increase injectivity when shot in an
severely overbalance condition? 3,500 psi
� How much Dynamic Underbalance (DUB) is needed to improve injectivity?
4© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
improve injectivity?
� Estimate the injection rate
MENAPS-11-23
Section IV Approach
� Lab Set Up– Section IV Diagram– Gun Setup – FGV (free gun volume)– Parameters
5© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
� Lab Results– Pressure Response– Injectivity
MENAPS-11-23
Section IV Diagram
6© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MENAPS-11-23
Section IV Parameters
Test Number
SPF Free Gun Volume,
cc
Overburden Pressure, psi
Pore Pressure,
psi
Wellbore Pressure,
psi
Overbalance Pressure, psi
1 – Zinc 12 515
5,000
Net Effective Stress
psi
4,000
1,000 4,500 3,5002 – Steel 12 515
3 – Steel 21 83
4 – Steel 2 1100
7© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
�Test 1 – Fully loaded Zinc Gun�Test 2 – Steel with same FGV for and apples to apples comparison�Test 3 – Fully loaded Steel Gun�Test 4 – Extreme case to increase FGV to induce a DUB response
�Charges: � 5 in. 12 SPF RDX SH Mirage� 5 in. 21 SPF RDX BH Cluster
�Fluid Gap: 0.80 in.�Casing: 0.50 in. 4140 steel�Cement: 1.55 in. Class A Neat �Wellbore Fluid: 3.5% NaCl
MENAPS-11-23
2Hz Pressure Traces after Perforation
4000
5000
6000W
ellb
ore
Pre
ssur
e (P
SI)
Test-01 WB Pressure Test-02 WB PressureTest-03 WB Pressure Test-04 WB PressureTest-01 Pore Pressure Test-02 Pore PressureTest-03 Pore Pressure Test-04 Pore Pressure
8© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
1000
2000
3000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (Seconds)
Wel
lbor
e P
ress
ure
(PS
I)
MENAPS-11-23
Injectivity
Cumulative Injection
5
6
7
8
9
Cum
ulat
ive
Inje
ctio
n in
Bar
rels
GC-01 Total Volume
GC-02 Total Volume
GC-03 Total Volume
GC-04 Total Volume
9© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Minutes
Cum
ulat
ive
Inje
ctio
n in
Bar
rels
MENAPS-11-23
Dynamic Surge Modeling
� ?’s that needs Answers– How does a full system at actual down hole condition
and geometry perform?
– Do we need the additional Free Gun Volume (FGV)?
10© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
– Do we need the additional Free Gun Volume (FGV)?
MENAPS-11-23
Gun Selection Based on Predicted DUB
8000
10000
12000
Avg
. Pre
ssu
re In
P
erfo
rate
d In
terv
al,
psi
Pressure vs Time
min average P: 4,476 psi
which yields 1,283 psi DUB
5,759 psi Reservoir
Pressure & 2,500 psi OB
11© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
2000
4000
6000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Avg
. Pre
ssu
re In
P
erfo
rate
d In
terv
al,
psi
Time, sec
5" 21 spf psi 5" 10 spf psi
min average P: 2,277 psi which yields 3,482 psi DUB
MENAPS-11-23
Updated Model to New Parameters
6,450 psi Reservoir
Pressure & 1,800 psi OB
12© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
min average P: 4,076 psi which yields 2,374 psi DUB
MENAPS-11-23
High Speed Data Validating Model
13© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Reservoir 6,450 psiMin Pres 3,916 psiYields 2,533 psi Actual DUBPredicted 2,374 psi avg.Difference of 159 psi
MENAPS-11-23
Comparing Lab Results to Model
6450 Reservoir
8450 Wellbore
Actual
14© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1000 Reservoir
4500 Wellbore
Reservoir
Lab
MENAPS-11-23
Rerun Model at Section IV conditions
15© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
1000 Reservoir
4500 Wellbore
MENAPS-11-23
Supporting Data 5 kH Wellbore Pressure
7" 45g BH
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Pre
ssur
e (p
si)
Test Number
Overburden Pressure, psi
Pore Pressure, psi
Wellbore Pressure,
psi
Underbalance Pressure, psi
Test Number
1 8,045 4,950 4,452 497.9 2809.42 8,042 4,951 4,455 495.3 2808.93 8,068 4,776 4,962 -186.0 2479.46 8,015 4,776 4,969 -193.1 2481.38 4,547 2,526 2,024 502.3 1461.15 4,566 2,496 2,033 463.3 1427.7
16© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
-0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45
Time (seconds)
Pre
ssur
e (p
si)
Test-01 Test-02 Test-03 Test-04 Test-05 Test-06 Test-07 Test-08
5 4,566 2,496 2,033 463.3 1427.77 4,555 1,512 1,038 477.7 745.34 4,566 1,540 1,053 486.8 765.7
MENAPS-11-23
Lessons Learned
� When parameters are the same; Section IV and Model DUB results are similar
� API Section IV Labs were build on the principle of net effective stress therefore Dynamic Surge Model needs to be run to account for the absolute differential between
17© 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
be run to account for the absolute differential between wellbore and gun
� Model has been validated by field data
� Model can be use to customize the gun system and tool string to optimize the DUB
MENAPS-11-23