shared christian praxis unit mmin 611 revised 1.8.09

52
Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

Upload: pranav-gaunt

Post on 01-Apr-2015

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

Shared Christian Praxis Unit

MMIN 611 • revised 1.8.09

Page 2: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

2

Contents of this file

• Intro to Tom Groome & SCP• My experiecne with Groome• Foreign elements in Groome’s Approache• Movements of SCP

Page 3: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

3

How do you . . .

• When preaching, how do you gain and keep listeners’ focused attention?

• In teaching-learning events, how do you facilitate appropriation of biblical truth by participants?

• Conduct yourself as a spouse? Parent? Friend?

Page 4: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

4

An introduction to Thomas H. Groome’s

Sharing Faith: A Comprehensive Approach

to Religious Education & Pastoral Ministry

(The Way of Shared Christian Praxis)

Page 5: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

5

My Experience with Tom Groome

• 3 courses at Boston College• First rate scholar.• Very personable. Good conversationalist.• Engaging teacher.• Innovative Roman Catholic educator.

Page 6: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

6

Shared

This approach to Christian teaching and ministry is dialogical. Participants engage in

conversation with each other, as well as foster a conversation between their lives and

the biblical text (Groome would say, “The Christian Story and Vision”).

Page 7: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

7

Christian

Not religious in general, but specifically Christian. Thus, the importance of “the

Christian Story.”

Page 8: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

8

Praxis

Not theory apart from practice, nor practice apart from theory. Theory and practice melded together. Groome would also name experience as a vehicle of God’s revelation.

Page 9: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

9

Foreign elements in Groome’s approach

• Praxis• Epistemology• Form, Inform & Transform Identity and Agency• Ontology• Conation (contrasted with cognition)• Christian Story and Vision• Dialectical hermeneutic

Page 10: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

10

Introduction to Shared Christian Praxis

• A style of doing ministry• Championed by Thomas Groome• Aims at transformation• Based on a particular understanding of

“knowing”

Page 11: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

11

Groome advocates a way of knowing that is be broader than cognition (p. 8)

“Thus, and ontological turn in our pedagogy encourages educators to engage and form, inform and transform the very being of people in the world” (p. 8)

Page 12: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

12

Purposes of Christian Religious Education

• For the Reign of God (14)• For Lived Christian Faith (18)• For the Wholeness of Human Freedom that is

Fullness of Life for All (21)• Transformation of being

Page 13: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

13

Thomas Groome on the Desired Outcomes of Ministry

• Ontology, not just • Conation, not just cognition• Ontological turn• Identity and Agency

Page 14: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

14

Key skill: question crafting and posing

• When approaching a teaching=learning event, rather than thinking in terms of “What am I going to tell them?, Think in term of “What am I going to ask them?”

Page 15: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

15

Selections from Thomas H. Groome’s

Sharing Faith: A Comprehensive Approach

to Religious Education & Pastoral Ministry

Page 16: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

16

Sharing Faith, p.2

“I have been convinced for some time that the learning outcome for Christian religious education should be more than what the Western world typically means by “knowledge”; that it is to engage the whole “being” of people, their heads, hearts and life-styles, and is to form, inform and transform their identity and agency in the world.”

Page 17: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

17

Sharing Faith, p.7

“…my hope is to contribute to broadening the philosophical foundations of Christian religious education beyond epistemology and people’s ways of ‘knowing’ to embrace ontology and people’s whole way of ‘being’ as human beings in the world.”

Page 18: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

18

Sharing Faith, p. 8 The nature and purposes of Christian religious education require that we promote personal cognition as a critically reflective, dialectical and dialogical process that encourages a “right relationship” between knower and known in a community of discourse and that we broaden our concern beyond simply cognition. The incarnational principle that stands at the heart of Christianity demands a pedagogy that is grounded in and shapes people’s ontic selves – their identity and agency in the world. For instance, our aim is not simply that people know about justice, but that they be just, not only understand compassion but be compassionate, and son on. We are then, to attend to all the dimensions of human ‘being’ and articulate our most basic philosophical foundation and task as ontological rather than simply epistemological. We need to make an ‘ontological turn’ in the very foundations of Christian religious education.

Page 19: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

19

Sharing Faith, p. 8

Thus an ontological turn’ in our pedagogy encourages educators to engage and inform, form and transform the very ‘being’ of people in the world.

I sometimes use the term epistemic ontology to reflect our educational interest and to signal my central conviction that epistemology and ontology, ‘knowing’ and ‘being,’ should be united in the philosophical foundations of Christian religious education.

Page 20: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

20

Sharing Faith, p. 9 The last term to be indicated briefly here is conation. I am prompted to revive this ancient term because it carries a holistic meaning. All education intends some learning outcome. When Christian religious education is ground in an “epistemic ontology,’ and treats people as ‘agent-subjects-in-relationship,’ the learning outcome effected includes but is more than what is typically meant by knowledge of cognition. Conation, I argue, is a more comprehensive term than cognition and more adequately names the earning outcome intended by CRE. For now, by conation, I mean what is realized when the whole ontic being of ‘agent-subjects-in-relationship’ is actively engaged to consciously know, desire, and do what is most humanizing and life-giving (i.e., “true”) for all. And for people who find the term too strange, I also use wisdom as a synonym for conation.

Page 21: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

21

The desired outcome of SCP…

• Transformation of Being.• Epistemology is ontological , rather than

merely intellectual. • What it means to “know” moves beyond

cognition to identity and agency. (Groome: “conation”)

Page 22: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

22

John 17:3 window

• And this is eternal life, that they know …

Page 23: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

23

Epistemology

• “deliberate attention to the dynamics, sources, and reiliabiity of human knowing” (p. 7)

• p. 36

Page 24: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

24

Epistemological Terms

• Conation (p. 26-27)• Cognition• Ontology & ontological• Being• agents

Page 25: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

25

A Primary Issue Dividing Epistemological Philosophies

• Mix of Reason (Rationalism) and Experience (Empericism)

Page 26: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

26

A History of Epistemological Inquiry

• The gods know; humans know only if the gods reveal knowledge to them.

• Pre-Socratic philosophers (600 BCE): humans are agents of their own knowing.

• Sophists• Skeptics - denied possibility of reliable

knowledge• Plato & Aristotle

Page 27: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

27

Plato

• 428 - 348 B.C.E. (Before the Common Era)

• Experience is unreliable …• Two kinds of Reality

1. the true and unchanging world of eternal ideas.2. the changing/becoming world of objects in time and

space1. Therefore, sensory experience is an insufficient means

of arriving at reliable knowledge.

Page 28: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

28

History continued…

• Aristotle, p. 42

Page 29: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

29

Some key passages in Sharing Faith

• Page 65 “Empiricism contains a central insight…”

• Page 82 “Let us note that even a text like the Scriptures…”

• Page 115 “Thus far I have proposed…”

Page 30: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

30

What is your teaching style?

• How do you prepare for a teaching/learning event? What do you take into consideration?

• What pedagogical “moves” do you make while teaching?

• What do you hope happens as a result of your having taught?

Page 31: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

31

Movements of SCP, pp. 146-148Focusing Activity

Movement 1: Naming/Expressing “Present Praxis’

Movement 2: Critical Reflection on Present Action

(Through reason, memory & imagination)

Movement 3: Making Accessible Christian Story and Vision

Movement 4: Dialectical Hermeneutic to Appropriate Christian Story/Vision

to Participants’ Stories and Visions Movement 5: Decision/Response for Lived Christian Faith

Page 32: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

32

The Movements of SCP

Focusing ActivityM1 - Looking at LifeM2 - Reflecting on LifeM3 - Knowing our FaithM4 - Making the Faith our OwnM5 - Living the Faith

Page 33: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

33

Focusing Activity(pages 155

Focuses the teaching-learning event by asking participants to look at some aspect of their present praxis of some life (Groome would say, “Generative”) theme.

Page 34: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

34

Four guidelines for effective focusing activities(pp. 170-171)

1. Turns people to attend to an aspect of present praxis that reflects the generative theme.

2. Engages participants; elicits their active participation. (aesthetics; physical; sensory; RC: “How will they participate?”

3. Establishes and creates a shared sense of “what this is about.”4. Proposes a theme that is appropriate and manageable for the

participants on this occasion in this context.

RC: Three characteristics of a good icebreaker for small group use:• Gets people talking.• Gets people talking about something they already know about.• Gets people talking about something they already know about that is

related to the topic or theme for that particular teaching-learning event.

Page 35: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

35

Movement 1: Expressing Present Praxis

• Looking at Life

Page 36: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

36

Movement 2: Critical Reflection on Present Praxis

Reflecting on Life using:• Memory• Reason• Imagination

Page 37: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

37

Movement 3: Making Accessible Christian Story & Vision

• Knowing our Faith

Page 38: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

38

Movement 4: Dialectical Hermeneutic to Appropriate Christian Story/Vision to

Participants’ Stories and Visions

• Making the Faith Our Own• Christian Story = the way Christians in the

past have understood and done this.• Christian Vision = God’s hope for the ways

this will be understood and done.

Page 39: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

39

Movement 5: Decision/Response for Lived Christian Faith

• Living our Faith• Calls participants to make a decision

regarding future praxis (how they will now proceed in light of discoveries/learnings acquired in this teaching-learning encounter).

Page 40: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

40

Reflections on SCP• A natural approach, but not simplistic (149-50).• A “public church” approach.• An emerging approach (Basic Christian Communities,

pp. 151-52).• Groome claims it is a comprehensive approach to

ministry (a way of preaching teaching, counseling, strategic planning, etc.)

• Engages participants.• Empowers participants.• Builds community as participants share their stories

and perspectives.• Calls for decision; new action. (RC: nothing changes

without new action)

Page 41: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

41

Potential Problems of SCP• Leading participants to dialogue about their

present praxis, to critically reflect on it, to appropriate the Christian Story and Vision, and to discern new action from can require considerable time. Can you do all this in 45 minutes?

• Movement 4 assumes that My Story and the Christian Story interpret each other. This gives experience equal authority to Scripture.

Page 42: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

42

What is your Hermeneutical Mix?

• Culture?• Tradition?• Scripture?• Experience?• Reason?

Page 43: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

43

To say it another way…• Looking at Life

• Reflecting on Life

• Knowing our Faith• Making the Faith our

Own• Living our Faith

• See what is happening.

• Think critically about it.

• Hear God’s Word• Decide how God’s

Word could change us

• Live the Truth

Page 44: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

Two places to begin: Text and Life

44

Page 45: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

45

1. Begin with biblical text and move to experience. (Textual curriculum)

• Advantage: Allows biblical text to set the curriculum and confront the participants.

• Disadvantage: The text does not always address the felt needs and concerns of the participants.

Page 46: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

46

2. Begin with lived experience and move to a biblical text. (Topical curriculum)

Advantage Easier to engage participants because you are discussing what is important to them; their felt needs.

Disadvantages: (1) If used alone, it is difficult to lead participants to a systematic knowledge of the Bible. (2) May not address the real needs of participants.

Page 47: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

47

Curriculum Examples

• Serendipity Bible: NIV text with three types of questions in margin: Open, Dig, Reflect

• Larry Richards: Hook, Book, Look & Took• Max Lucado’s curriculum• Common pattern: Living Text Living• When I preach…

Page 48: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

48

Invites Transformation

Page 49: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

49

Learning Exercise #1 (Begin with lived experience and move to a biblical text).

• Choose a contemporary concern by taking inventory of what’s happening in the life of your participants (or, in personal study, your life). What is happening internally, interpersonally, internationally?

• What biblical texts address these concerns?

Page 50: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

50

From Life to Text

• For each of the five movements of SCP, craft some question that will help participants to engage that particular movement.

• Create a focusing activity to introduce this theme.

Page 51: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

51

Learning Exercise #2 (Begin with a biblical text and move to experience).

• Pick a biblical text (verse, chapter, or book).• Determine an overarching emphasis of the

text. This becomes your focusing theme.• Begin to identify the connections between the

theme of the text and contemporary experience.

Page 52: Shared Christian Praxis Unit MMIN 611 revised 1.8.09

52

From Text to Life

• For each of the five movements of SCP, craft some question that will help participants to engage that particular movement.

• Create a focusing activity to introduce this theme.