skema annual progress report 16 june 2009 to 15 … · lists from excel spreadsheets. ... ils...
TRANSCRIPT
© SKEMA Page 1 28/10/2010
SKEMA Annual Progress Report
16 June 2009 to 15 June 2010
Draft v 0.8
Contents
1. Report structure ......................................................................................................................... 2
2. Introduction to the SKEMA Project ............................................................................................ 2
2.1 First year achievements ........................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Review recommendations .................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Second year objectives ......................................................................................................... 3
3. Second year progress overview .................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Achievements ........................................................................................................................ 4
3.2 Performance measurements ................................................................................................ 6
3.3 Consortium issues ................................................................................................................. 6
3.4 Challenges ............................................................................................................................. 7
4. Resources status ......................................................................................................................... 7
Cost statements Summary .......................................................................................................... 7
5. Priorities for Year 3 .................................................................................................................... 8
6. Second SKEMA Review Deliverables List ................................................................................... 9
6.1 Deliverables List .................................................................................................................... 9
6.2 Web Links to Deliverables ................................................................................................... 10
SKEMA Outputs Log ...................................................................................................................... 16
1. Deliverables Log .................................................................................................................... 16
Deliverables submitted for year 1review and year 2 review ................................................ 18
2. SKEMA Studies Log ................................................................................................................ 19
© SKEMA Page 2 28/10/2010
1. Report structure
This second Annual SKEMA Project Management Report is structured as follows:
• Project objectives specifically for the second year including first year review
recommendations
• Progress overview
• Resources spent details
• Plans for the next year
• SKEMA Outputs Log
2. Introduction to the SKEMA Project
SKEMA is a three year project funded by the European Commission - DGTREN under the
Seventh Framework Programme. It is aimed at establishing a Sustainable Knowledge Platform
for the use of stakeholders in the Maritime Transport & Logistics industry. The SKEMA
Knowledge Platform will contain a Knowledge Base that will be populated by project Studies
and outputs from workshops and case studies addressing key challenges for the European
maritime transport and logistics industry. The Studies will be constructed to facilitate improved
usability and accessibility of valuable results from previous projects, studies & publications.
SKEMA encompasses three mutually supporting components, namely a Knowledge Base
system, Studies and a Thematic Network.
• Consolidation Studies will provide a coherent view of key aspects of Maritime Transport
and Logistics, based on the challenges posed by the Commission’s Mid-Term Review.
• Periodic Studies will address areas of interest to DGTREN in a focussed and well-scoped
manner.
• The Thematic Network will engage the maritime transport & logistics industry in the
activities and outputs of SKEMA.
2.1 First year achievements
During the first year the project produced the SKEMA Knowledge Platform offering to the
maritime transport and logistics community a public electronic library containing the SKEMA
© SKEMA Page 3 28/10/2010
Consolidation & Periodic Studies and related information in subject-specific categories as
specified in the SKEMA Subject Index and the SKEMA Policies Index. Over 40 Consolidation
studies were produced creating a ‘baseline’ set for the entire Transport and Logistics domain.
Two periodic studies were initiated on e-Maritime and on ‘Impact Study of the future
requirements of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention on Short Sea Shipping’
Three stakeholder meetings were successfully organised.
2.2 Review recommendations
A list of recomendations is summarised below:
• Better Quality control on deliverables for consistency and ‘future proofing’ would
help the project to avoid rework on content.
• Central log of risks and issues in delivery would help identify outstanding tasks and
ownership without excessive progress chasing.
• Report of performance metrics in the annual report including Network development
would give the Commission better visibility of progress.
• Dissemination activities to be reported in more detail to show progress against the
sustainability objective.
• Elaborate the Dissemination and Communication plan as a priority action.
• Annual Report by the project manager should provide commentary to explain any
possible significant deviations from planned resource usage and any proposed
corrective actions for the next review.
• Annual Report should record formally the transfer of resources between partners
for the next review and to clarify the reporting of resource utilisation by partner.
• The project should explore the use of Wikipedia to inform its ‘go public’ strategy.
• Forward plans for workshops to be developed in discussion with the EC and
stakeholders to ensure good attendance.
• The Trade Associations associated with Maritime and Logistics could be invited to
contribute by comment on the studies to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives
have been included and references used are complete.
• The Database of Experts and stakeholders being developed should be put under
quality control and registered appropriately with the potential usages envisaged in
mind
2.3 Second year objectives
1. Introduce recommendations into the work programme
2. Complete all Consolidation Studies (reviews, refinements and remaining studies as
indicated in this report). Additional specialised studies using external experts are also
planned.
3. Progress with periodic Studies – critically important to provide outputs on time and to
the expected quality.
© SKEMA Page 4 28/10/2010
4. Each partner to manage content for their areas of responsibility in the knowledge
platform.
5. Progressively increase contributors to the knowledge base.
6. Evaluate the usability of the platform using workshops and undertake improvements.
7. Prepare for extensive dissemination from end of year 2.
3. Second year progress overview
3.1 Achievements
1. Instigation of strategies and practices addressing the review recommendations,
specifically:
a. Established a central Log for SKEMA outputs (appended in this report) to
improve the visibly of the status of deliverables and Studies and associated
Quality control.
b. Additional focus was placed on raising SKEMA’s profile across Europe. This was
achieved through publishing articles and presenting topical SKEMA studies at
industry specific events, and, inviting industry representatives to become
registered experts.
2. A fully operational SKEMA Knowledge Base System (version 2) was produced with
substantial content. Main extensions from version 1 include:
a. Continuous refinements to improve robustness and speed
b. Totally revamped content management user interface to make it easier for
partner and external users to contribute; includes possibility to input reference
lists from excel spreadsheets.
c. Provided an ‘automatic’ content acquisition system bringing news from over 50
information sources associated with each element of the SKEMA Index and
facilitating editors to edit / reassign
d. Provided facilities for filtering and displaying ‘hot news’
e. Provided mechanisms for role based user registration options
f. Provided restructuring of the experts registration module
g. Provided extensive integration mechanisms for extending the knowledge
development through other projects
© SKEMA Page 5 28/10/2010
h. Facilitated additional modules for other projects (e.g. marketing support for
PROPS)
3. 10 new or extended consolidation studies were produced (as specified in the SKEMA
outputs log)
4. Five Periodic Studies were produced or initiated as follows:
a. e-Maritime reports extensively covering different aspects to support the
development of solid foundations for the initiative. The reports were produced
with extensive involvement of all partners
b. Impact Study of the future requirements of Annex VI of the MARPOL
Convention on Short Sea Shipping; study engaged a number of external experts
and has been presented in a number of EU and industry events
c. Weathering the Economic Crisis aimed at identifying actions that may be taken
by the Commission that would help the European maritime industry to weather
the current economic crisis and to be in good condition to avail of opportunities
in the recovery
d. Standard Ro-Ro unit – Study in collaboration with ESPO to find and agree upon a
measurement that gives a fair and transparent description of cargo flows, cargo
handling and capacities in ports and ships (to be completed third year)
e. ‘Study on the implementation of Article 10 of Regulation EC 391/2009 within
the European maritime equipment industry. In co-operation with EMEC (to be
completed third year)
f. Review of "the Marco Polo calculator" used to calculate external costs
coefficients used for the evaluation of the proposals of the Marco Polo
programme. (initiated for the third year)
5. Thematic Network activities with one stakeholder meeting organised and two meetings
supported
a. “Sailing Through Troubled Waters” Hosted by the Copenhagen Business School,
17-18th
February 2010, themes: Financing opportunities in the recovery
Transport services as contributors to European prosperity European Policies and
challenges posed by Green Shipping, Sustainability of the maritime industry
through Knowledge.
© SKEMA Page 6 28/10/2010
b. Supported the e-Maritime workshop as part of the 3rd European Maritime Day
Stakeholder Conference (2 June 2010)1 .
c. The e-Maritime Stakeholder conference Brussels 1st
July
3.2 Performance measurements
Year 1 Year2 Subject Info 120 168 Studies /documents 100 250 News 10 571 Experts 50 161 Glossary Terms 20 114 Information sources 20 213 Events 24 121 Journals 15 19 Product Services 0 43 Stakeholders 23 23
3.3 Consortium issues
All partners are contributing effectively to the work programme and participated actively in
periodic studies.
PORTEL withdrew from the consortium Dec 09 due to internal restructuring. The remaining
budget was reallocated to the EMEC subcontract.
The formal representation of OL in the project has changed but without any practical difference
Öresund University (ÖU) is financed by nine universities in Sweden and Denmark. From the
beginning the administration in Denmark was placed at Copenhagen University (UCPH) and in
Sweden at Lund University. On the 1st of January 2009 all administration in Denmark was
moved to Roskilde University (RUC) since RUC is one of the members in ÖU. All administration
concerning economy and personnel were moved to RUC at this date and RUC is now the official
partner.
1 http://www.skematransport.eu/default.aspx?articleID=18784&heading=Stakeholder Workshops
© SKEMA Page 7 28/10/2010
3.4 Challenges
The work ran smoothly in the second year with the focus on periodic studies.
Main challenge appears to be ensuring consistent contribution for updating and extending
existing content. The automatic content acquisition works well. The overall supervision of
content requires excessive resources for the project management team.
The strategy is to manage future content through involvement of teams from new projects. This
is already working well within the e-Freight project.
4. Resources status
Cost statements Summary
Organisation Short Name Year 1 Claims Year 2
Claims Total
Budget % Spent 1st
Year
% Spent 1st
and 2nd Year
AUEB-RC 54537.13 59450.93 237305.00 22.98% 48.03%
VTT 70748.24 57931.5 226840.00 31.19% 56.73%
NECL 131646.38 106884.44 267768.00 49.16% 89.08%
ILS 134228.30 160000 266237.00 50.42% 110.51%
UGOT 54471.71 48233.96 180589.00 30.16% 56.87%
CETLE 65604.91 60140.64 173875.00 37.73% 72.32%
EBOS 84080.15 69612.42 151405.00 55.53% 101.51%
MAL 36555.94 20453.31 113313.00 32.26% 50.31%
GPI 78888.45 40317.19 141133.00 55.90% 84.46%
PORTEL 47829.00 38775 131824.00 36.28% 65.70%
IEA 18257.37 30449.99 80785.00 22.60% 60.29%
AT 24677.52 21151.23 73295.00 33.67% 62.53%
DPC 26434.77 26434.77 66019.00 40.04% 80.08%
OL 25475.51 30627.94 89612.50 28.43% 62.61%
853435.38 770463.32 2200000.50 38.79% 73.81%
Overall the budget resource consumption situation is reasonable with some overspend by ILS
and eBOS associated with the higher cost for developing and managing the SKEMA platform.
Both organisations are committed to provide additional resources to fulfil project
requirements.
AUEB is under-spending party because certain contributors were not paid as yet for work done
in second year.
© SKEMA Page 8 28/10/2010
5. Priorities for Year 3
1. Provide highly focused consolidation studies on key issues fort the industry.
2. Continue with periodic Studies following the successful co-operation with the DG MOVE
based on flexible organisation of studies targeting current affairs
3. Continue and expand co-operation with new projects as this appears to be a practical
way for Broader Participative Development
4. Expand dissemination through both SKEMA specific events and dissemination actions
and through collaborative events with other projects.
Overall we are keeping n line with the original strategy described below.
© SKEMA Page 9 28/10/2010
6. Second SKEMA Review Deliverables List
6.1 Deliverables List
Y2D1 D1.2 SKEMA Knowledge Base System (prototype) version 3
D2.1 Economics and regulations Y2D2 D2.1.1.x Port market developments and strategies - Uni Antwerp/AUEB - V2.0 12.9/10
Y2D3 D2.1.3 Maritime Governance ILS V1.1 19/1/09
Y2D4
D2.1.4.3 Interaction of international and national legislation for shipping safety and
security V3 29/12/09 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
D2.2 Transport and Logistics Developments:
Y2D5
D2.2.1.2 Guidelines for selecting strategically important logistic concepts VTT V3.0
30/06/10 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
Y2D6 D2.2.2.3 Ship and fleet management processes ILS V1 7/06/10
Y2D7 D 2.2.5 Key Performance Indicators GPI V0.7 27/01/10 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
D2.3 Safety Security and Sustainability Capabilities
Y2D8
D2.3.1.4 Practicalities of using SSN and safety / security support systems in Latvia V3.0
10/04/10(Update of year 1 deliverable)
D2.4 Technology Forecasting and Assessment Y2D10 D2.4.4.1 Standardisation of D2D Information Flows ILS 15/5/10
D3.2 Periodic Study Reports
YR2D11 D3.2.1 Periodic study on e-Maritime ILS -eight reports
YR2D12
D3.2.2 Periodic Study on Impact Study of the future requirements of Annex VI of the
MARPOL Convention on Short Sea Shipping NECL V 3/6/10
YR2D13 D3.2.3 Weathering the Economic Crisis NECL/UGOT/ALL+ V3 19/2/10
Y2D15 D4.5 Dissemination and Policy Recommendations
© SKEMA Page 10 28/10/2010
6.2 Web Links to Deliverables
D1.2 SKEMA Knowledge Base System (prototype) version 3
The SKEMA Knowledge Base presents the thematic areas in a tree formation, which is also referred to as
the SKEMA Index. All of the studies and deliverables are presented under the following areas:
The consolidation studies (D2.*) and periodic studies (D3.*) are listed in the tables below showing:
o A graphic displaying the location of the study within the SKEMA Index.
o The deliverable name, Consortium partner, deliverable version and deliverable date.
o A link to the SKEMA Knowledge Base page describing the study. The deliverable is at the
bottom of this page.
© SKEMA Page 11 28/10/2010
D2.1 Economics and regulations
D2.1.1.x Port market developments and strategies
University of Antwerp/AUEB
V2.0 12.9/10
Link
D2.1.3 Maritime Governance
ILS
V1.1 19/1/09
Link
D2.1.4.3 Interaction of international and national
legislation for shipping safety and security
MAL
V3 29/12/09 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
Link
© SKEMA Page 12 28/10/2010
D2.2 Transport and Logistics Developments
D2.2.1.2 Guidelines for selecting strategically
important logistic concepts
VTT
V3.0 30/06/10 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
Link
D2.2.2.3 Ship and fleet management processes
ILS
V1 7/06/10
Link
D2.2.5 Key Performance Indicators
GPI
V0.7 27/01/10 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
Link
© SKEMA Page 13 28/10/2010
D2.3 Safety Security and Sustainability Capabilities
D2.3.1.4 Practicalities of using SSN and safety /
security support systems in Latvia
MAL
V3.0 10/04/10 (Update of year 1 deliverable)
Link
D2.4 Technology Forecasting and Assessment
D2.4.4.1 Standardisation of D2D Information Flow-
ILS
V 15/05/10
Link
D2.4.5 Co-modal Transport 2030
VTT
V1 22/09/10 Version 1 under quality review not on
the platform
© SKEMA Page 14 28/10/2010
D3.2 Periodic Study Reports
D3.2.1 Periodic study on e-Maritime
ILS
[ summary and main reports published]
Link
D3.2.2 Periodic Study on Impact Study of the future
requirements of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention
on Short Sea Shipping
NECL
V 3/6/10
Link
© SKEMA Page 16 28/10/2010
SKEMA Outputs Log
The SKEMA outputs log is the response of the project to 1st
year review recommendations to improve the visibly of the status of deliverables
and Studies and associated Quality control.
The SKEMA outputs log is centralised and is the responsibility of the Project manager.
1. Deliverables Log
The status of the deliverables is shown in the following table.
The log is kept updated by the Project Manager. Checked by the project participants
The Consolidation Study deliverables D2.1 to D2.5 are kept relatively constant in line with the SKEMA Index. The status of Consolidation Study
elements included in each deliverable is given in the following Consolidation Studies Log. It should be noted that D2.5 has been subsumed in
D2.1 and D2.2.
A separate log is kept for the Periodic Studies.
Quality reviews are now incorporated in producing the deliverables.
Approvals supervised by project manager (i.e. essentially only one management approval is required)
Deli
verable Deliverable title Delivery Study
elements
Status Revised
Schedule
Actual
Delivery
Comments /Actions
V1 V2 V3
D1.1 Maritime Transport and Logistics Domain Specification 3
Completed
31/10/08 A final version will be produced at
the end of the project.
D1.2 SKEMA Knowledge Base System 8 14 24
Version 3
15/6/10 Refinements will continue to the
end of the project
D1.3 Project Intranet & Information Observatory 2 9 24 Version 3 completed 15/06/10 Only maintenance
D2.1 Economic - Regulatory - Policy Analysis 6 12 23 SE1.1 to SE1.7 Completed 15/06/10 Content enhancements
D2.2 Maritime Transport and Logistics Developments 6 12 24 SE2.1 to SE2.6 Completed
15/06/10 Content enhancements
© SKEMA Page 17 28/10/2010
D2.3 Safety Security and Sustainability Capabilities 6 12 23 SE3.1 to SE3.3 Completed
15/06/10 Content enhancements
D2.4 Technology Forecasting and Assessment 6 12 23 SE4.1 to SE4.5 Completed 15/06/10 Content enhancements
D2.5 Performance Indicators and Benchmarking 12 24 Included in D2.1 and D2.2
D3.1 Planning and preparation of Periodic Studies 3 9 21 Maintained as log 15/09/10 See periodic Studies Log
D3.2 Periodic Studies (approx 10) implementation 3 completed plus 3 in
progress
Periodic Studies became main focus
in year 2 particularly for e-Maritime
D4.1 SKEMA Network of Experts and Practitioners 3 12 24 Delivered(V) 15/09/10 Database revisions completed
D4.2 European Maritime Transport Monitor 12 24
Monitoring op all
information sources
included in SKEMA
Started from July 09
D4.3 Workshops and Case Studies 12 24 30
Progressing as planned
One workshop – Copenhagen in
second year. Future workshops in
co-operation with other projects
D4.4 DGTREN Short Assignments 12 24
No assignments received
/subsumed in periodic studies
D4.5 Dissemination and Policy Recommendations 12 24 36
Delivered
15/06/10 Extension and dissemination trough
common actions with other EU
projects
D5.1a Project Manual and Detailed Project Plan 1 12 24 Project manual delivered
24/07/08 Revisions through this document
D5.1b Progress Management Reports Bimonthly
Updated log
Annual report
D5.2 Quality Plan and reports 4 18 Quality plan delivered 31/08/08 Quality report included in this log
© SKEMA Page 18 28/10/2010
Deliverables submitted for year 1review and year 2 review
Deliverable No2
Deliverable title WP No
Nature3
Dn level4
Delivery date V1 V2 V3
YR1 Review YR2
D1.1 D1.2 D1.3
Maritime Transport and Logistics Domain Specification SKEMA Knowledge Base System Project Intranet - Extranet & Information Observatory
1 1 1
R P P
PU PU PU
3 8 14 24 2 9 24
D1.1 D1.2 v1 D1.3 v2
V3 V3
D2.1 D2.2 D2.3 D2.4 D2.5
Economic - Regulatory - Policy Analysis Maritime Transport and Logistics Developments Safety Security and Sustainability Capabilities Technology Forecasting and Assessment Performance Indicators and Benchmarking
2 2 2 2 2
R R R R R
PU PU PU PU PU
6 12 23 6 12 24 6 12 23 6 12 23 12 24
D211,D2111,D2112,D2114, D212, D214, D2141, D2142, D2143,D215 D2211, D2212,D2213, D2221, D2222 D2311,D2312,D2314,D232,D2321,D2322 D233,D2331,D2332,D2333,D2334, D2335 D241,D2411,D2442,D242,D243,D2431-4 Subsumed above
D211X, D213, D2143 D2212, D2223, D225 D2314 D2441
D3.1 D3.2
Planning and preparation of Periodic Studies Periodic Studies (approx 10) implementation
3 3
R R
PU PU
3 9 21 D321
D3.1 D321, D322, D323
D4.1 D4.2 D4.3 D4.4 D4.5
SKEMA Network of Experts and Practitioners European Maritime Transport Monitor Workshops and Case Studies DGTREN Short Assignments Dissemination and Annual Policy Recommendations
4 4 4 4 4
R R R R R
PU PU PU PU PU
3 12 24 12 24 12 24 30 12 24 12 24 36
D4.3 Not used
D4.1 D4.2 Not used D4.5
D5.1a D5.1b D5.2
Project Manual and Detailed Project Plan Progress Management Reports Quality Plan and reports
5 5
R R
RE RE
1 12 24 Bimonthly 4 18
D51a Annual report 1 D5.2
Annual report 2
Notes: 1. Only representatives updated deliverables have been submitted for 2nd year review (in blue); D2213(not available) Year 3 consolidation studies: D224, Updates: D2223, D2441 / Deliverable updates D1.1-1.3, D4.1-D4.5, D5.2
2 Deliverable numbers in order of delivery dates: D1 – Dn
3 Please indicate the nature of the deliverable using one of the following codes:
R = Report P = Prototype D = Demonstrator O = Other 4 Please indicate the dissemination level using one of the following codes: PU = Public ;PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) .RE = Restricted to a group specified by
the consortium (including the Commission Services).CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services)
© SKEMA Page 19 28/10/2010
2. SKEMA Studies Log
The log is kept updated by the Project Manager. Checked by WP2 and WP3 leader and Quality manager
D2 denotes consolidation, D3 denotes periodic study. The log is kept aligned to the SKEMA Index
Version Year Main
contributors
Responsible Further
action D2.1 Economics and regulations consisting of the following 10 studies):
D2.1.1 The maritime transport market
D2.1.1.x Port market developments and strategies
D2.1.1.1 Key factors in the evolution of freight transport
D2.1.1.2 Trade and transport Models
D3.2.3 Weathering the Economic Crisis
D3.2.2 Impact Study of the future requirements of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention
on Short Sea Shipping’
D2.1.1.5 Feasibility of New RoRo RoPax Services between Ireland and Continental
Europe
D2.1.2 Financing transport resources
D2.1.3 Maritime Governance
D2.1.4 Regulatory Framework
D2.1.4.1 EU Competition Regulations for the Maritime Sector
D2.1.4.2 Review of Directive 2002/59/EC and associated initiatives
D2.1.4.3 Interaction of international and national legislation
‘Study on the implementation of Article 10 of Regulation EC 391/2009 within the
European maritime equipment industry
V2.1 6/9/09
V2.0 12.9/10
V2 7/09/09
V2 21/8/09
V3 19/2/10
3/06/10
8/9/09
V1 30/1/09
V1.1 19/1/09
V2 15/05/09
V2 15/07/09
V3 29/12/09
1ST
2nd
1st
1st
2nd
1st and 2nd
1st
1st
2nd
1st
1ST
1st
AUEB/ILS
Uni Antwerp/AUEB
NECL
AUEB/ NECL
NECL
NECL/UGOT/AUEB
NECL+
GPI/AUEB
ILS
AUEB
CETLE
MAL
AUEB
H McLaughlin
T Vanelslander
G Trant
I Koliousis
A Trant
James Kehoe
G Trant
V Bojkova
H McLaughlin
V Bageri,
D Jarvis
A Gailis
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Year 3
Actual online Index 22Sep10
© SKEMA Page 20 28/10/2010
Economics and Regulations
The maritime transport market
Port market developments and strategies
Key factors in the evolution of freight transport
Trade and Transport Models
An interpretation of inter-container port relationships from the demand perspective
Effects of the global recession on shipping
Impact Study of the future requirements of Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention on Short Sea Shipping’
... Feasibility of New RoRo / RoPax Services
between Ireland and Continental Europe
Financing transport resources
Finance of Transport Services
Finance of Transport Infrastructure
Case Study – Japanese Business Practice
Maritime Governance
Regulatory Framework
EU Competition Policy
Review of ‘monitoring’ Directive 2002/59/EC
Interaction of international and national legislation
EU Transport Policy Analysis
EU Transport policy and its instruments
Case Study - Canadian Transportation "Sustainability"
Version Year Main
contributors
Responsible Further
action D2.2 Transport and Logistics Developments
D2.2.1 Trends in logistics and supply chain management
V2.1 -6Sept09
1ST
VTT
A Permala
Final
© SKEMA Page 21 28/10/2010
D2.2.1.1 Review of logistics concepts adopted in the last decade
D2.2.1.2 Guidelines for selecting strategically important logistic concepts
D2.2.1.3 Supply chain integration and intelligent logistics - solutions and benefits
D2.2.2 Intermodal developments
D2.2.2.1 Short Sea Shipping developments
D2.2.2.2 Ports organisational and infrastructure strategies
D2.2.2.3 Ship and fleet management processes
Standard Ro-Ro unit – Study
D2.2.3 Human resources - education & training
D2.2.3.1 Human resourcing - education & training in the maritime sector
D2.2.3.2 Port related training
D 2.2.4 Design and management of improved D2D Networks
D 2.2.5 Key Performance Indicators
D2.2.5.1 Review of Performance Indicators and Quality Criteria
D3.2.1 The EU e-Maritime initiative
D2.2.7 The EU e-Freight initiative
V3.0 29/01/10
V3.0 30/06/10
V2.0 22/05/09
V2 8/9/09
V2 8Sept 09
V1 7/06/10
V2 4/9/09
V2 18/03/09
V0.7 27/01/10
Series of reports
Summary 5/3/10
1ST
and 2nd
1st
and 2nd
1st
1st
1st
2nd
1st
1st
1st AND
2nd
1st AND
2nd
VTT
VTT
OL
AUEB/ILS
NECL/DPC/IEA
ILS
VTT
UGOT/ILS
NECL/DPC
NECL
GPI/VTT
ILS/NECL/ALL
ILS
J Eckhard
J Eckhard
Jan Boyesen
I Koliousis
G Trant
D Morgan
Gill Widell
G Trant
G Trant
V Bojkova
H McLaughlin
T Katsoulakos
Final
Final
Under revision
Final; extension in
Props Knowledge
Final
To be refined yr3
Yr3
To be refined yr3
Final
In progress
31/12/10
Final
Will be further
developed under
eMAR
developed under
e-Freight project
Transport & Logistics Developments
Dominant trends in logistics
Review of logistics concepts adopted in the last decade
An exploration of supply chain structure in Korean companies
Guidelines for selecting logistic concepts
© SKEMA Page 22 28/10/2010
Segmentation of the Transportation Market with Regard to Activity-
based Freight Transport Modelling
Supply chain integration and intelligent logistics
Intermodal developments
Short Sea Shipping developments
SSS solutions across the continents
Integration of SSS in Intermodal chains
Bottlenecks - progress reports
Ports organisational and infrastructure strategies
Ship and fleet management processes
Human resources - education & training
Design and management of D2D networks
Key Performance Indicators
The EU e-Maritime Initiative
e-Maritime standardisation requirements and strategies
e-Maritime policy options
Maritime Single Windows
Port related e-Maritime services
Ship related e-Maritime services
Promotion of the seafaring profession and sea shipping
The EU e-Freight Initiative
© SKEMA Page 23 28/10/2010
Version Year Main
contributors
Responsible Further
action D2.3 Safety Security and Sustainability Capabilities consisting of the following 9 studies:
D2.3.1 European capabilities for safety and security –(no report at this level – year 2)
D2.3.1.1 Maritime Operational Services (MOS)
D2.3.1.2 Maritime Information Management
D2.3.1.3 Organisational restructuring requirements (for second year)
D2.3.1.4 Practicalities of using SSN and safety / security support systems in Latvia
D2.3.2 Methods for assessing safety and security performance
D2.3.2.1 Review of collision and grounding risk analysis methods which can utilize the historical AIS
data and traffic patterns in seawaters
D2.3.2.2 Evaluation of methods to estimate the consequence costs of an oil spill
D2.3.2.3 Dynamic risk management methods – ship risk indexes
D2.3.3 Sustainable Transport
D2.3.3.1 Methods for calculating externalities
Review of "the Marco Polo calculator"
D2.3.3.2 Emission trading schemes
D2.3.3.3 Sustainability Perspectives on Marketing Maritime and Co-modal transport services
D2.3.3.4 Corporate responsibility practices in a Ship & Logistics Operator -Acciona
D2.3.3.5 Corporate responsibility practices in the Ports -Dublin case study
V2. 15/7/09
V2. 15/7/09
V2.0 15/7/09
V3.0 10/04/10
V2.0 3/06/09
V2.0 3/06/09
V3 30/06/10
V1.2 7/09/10
1ST
1ST
1st
1st AND
2nd
1st
1st
1st AND
2nd
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
CETTLE
CETTLE
CETTLE
MAL
VTT
VTT
VTT
CETTLE
ILS
GPI/VTT
NECL
UGOT
UGOT
AT
NECL/AT
D Jarvis
D Jarvis
D Jarvis
A Gailis
T Nyman
T Nyman
T Nyman
T Katsoulakos
V Bojkova
Z Nikopoulou
C Lammgård
J Saenz Arostegui
G Trant
Final
Final
Not available
Final
Final
Final
Final
possibly yr3
Final
Final
New
Final
Final
Final
Final
© SKEMA Page 24 28/10/2010
Safety Security & Sustainability
EU capabilities for safety & security
Maritime Operational Services
Ship Reporting Information Management
Organisational restructuring requirements
Practicalities of using SSN and safety / security support systems in Latvia
Safety and security assessment
Review of collision and grounding risk analysis methods
Evaluation of methods to estimate the consequence costs of an oil spill
Sustainable Transport
Methods for calculating externalities
Case Study
Emission trading schemes
ETS
Marketing Sustainability Perspectives
Social innovation and marketing
Shipping sustainability monitor
Corporate responsibility practices in a Ship & Logistics Operator -Acciona
Case Study: Sustainable Intermodal Transport Services on the
Atlantic Arc
© SKEMA Page 25 28/10/2010
Version Year Main
contributors
Responsible Further
action
D2.4 Technology Forecasting and Assessment
D2.4.1 Ship and fleet management technologies
D2.4.1.1 Navigation system sand e-navigation
D2.4.1.2 Environmental technologies
D2.4.2 Port Technologies
D2.4.3 Technologies deployed to improve visibility and operational risk management within supply
chains
D2.4.3.1 Overview of automated identification technologies – advantages and selection criteria
D2.4.3.2 RFID Drivers
D2.4.3.3 Sensor technology combined RFID to monitor shipments and transport units
D2.4.3.4 Practical examples and experiences of visibility systems deployments
D2.4.4 ICT developments for Integrated D2D freight transport services
D2.4.5 Co-modal Transport 2030
V2. 2/9/09
V1. 2. 15/7/09
V1.0 10/04/10
V2.0 30/06/09
V.2 8/06/09
V2 8/06/09
V2 8/6/09
V2 8/06/09
V2 25/09/09
V1 22/09/10
1ST
1ST
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
1st
2nd
2nd
ILS
ILS
UGOT
PORTEL
VTT
VTT
VTT
VTT
ILS/EBOS
VTT
D Morgan
D Morgan
Z Nikopoulou
P de Castro
A Permala
A Permala
A Permala
A Permala
D Morgan
Karri Rantasila
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Final
Will be expanded
through e-Freight
Will be expanded
through e-Freight
Yr 3
© SKEMA Page 26 28/10/2010
Technology Assessment
Port technologies
Port Community Systems.
Port of Genoa IS - 2007
Ship technology
Navigation systems including developments
in e-navigation
Development of an e-Navigation strategy
implementation plan
Environmental technologies
Visibility within supply chains
Overview of automated identification
technologies – advantages and selection
criteria
Drivers for the deployment of RFID
(technological and cost advancements)
Sensor technology combined RFID to
monitor shipments and transport units
Practical examples and experiences of
visibility systems deployments
ICT developments
Standardisation of D2D stakeholder
information exchange messages