social software research for aahrus

49
Overview of Research Methodologies for Social Software Research Aarhus University, Denmark January 21, 2009 Terry Anderson, Ph.D. Canada Research Chair in Distance EducaAon

Post on 21-Oct-2014

1.621 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Review of research metholdogies, hints and tips for PhD seminar at Aarhus University, Denmark. January 2009

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Overview of Research Methodologies for Social

Software Research

AarhusUniversity,DenmarkJanuary21,2009TerryAnderson,Ph.D.

CanadaResearchChairinDistanceEducaAon

Page 2: Social Software Research For Aahrus

ThecontextofSocialSoFwareImplementaAon

•  DisrupAve(Christensen,2008)simpler,notwantedbymainstreamcustomers

•  RapidgainsinfuncAonality•  Cheaper•  AdapAve

Page 3: Social Software Research For Aahrus

StudyingTechnologicalBasedModelsofChange

•  Technologicaldeterminism(Marx,Zuboff,Kurzweil)

•  AffordancesandSocialConstrucAvist(Bjiker,StewartandWilliams,Dalsgaard

•  DomesAficaAon/AppropriaAon–(Silverston,Ling)

Page 4: Social Software Research For Aahrus
Page 5: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Research Paradigms

Page 6: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Paradigm1QuanAtaAveResearch

Page 7: Social Software Research For Aahrus

•  “thosewhoareseekingthestrictwayoftruthshouldnottroublethemselvesaboutanyobjectconcerningwhichtheycannothaveacertaintyequaltoarithmeAcorgeometricaldemonstraAon”–  (ReneDescartes)

•  Inordinatesupportandfaithinrandomizedcontrolledstudies

Page 8: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QuanAtaAve1–CMCContentAnalysis

•  Anderson,Garrison,Rourke1997‐2003–  hcp://communiAesofinquiry.com‐9papersreviewingresults

focusingonreliable,quanAtaAveanalysis–  IdenAfiedwaystomeasureteaching,socialandcogniAve

‘presence’–  MostreliablemethodsarebeyondcurrentAmeconstraintsof

busyteachers–  QuesAonsofvalidity–  ServesasbasicresearchasgroundingforAImethodsofthe

future–  ServesasqualitaAveheurisAcforteachersandcoursedesigners

Page 9: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QuanAtaAve–Meta‐Analysis

•  UngerleiderandBurns(2003)•  SystemaAcreviewofeffecAvenessandefficiencyofICT

•  The type of interventions studied were extraordinary diverse –only criteria was a comparison group

•  “Only 10 of the 25 studies included in the in-depth review were not seriously flawed, a sobering statistic given the constraints that went into selecting them for the review.”

Page 10: Social Software Research For Aahrus
Page 11: Social Software Research For Aahrus

IsDEBecerthanClassroomInstrucAon?Project1:2000–2004

•  QuesAon:HowdoesdistanceeducaAoncomparetoclassroominstrucAon?(inclusivedates1985‐2002)

•  Totalnumberofeffectsizes:k=232

•  Measures:Achievement,AmtudesandRetenAon(oppositeofdrop‐out)

•  DividedintoAsynchronousandSynchronousDE

11

Page 12: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Primaryfindings•  DEandCIareessenAallyequal(g+≈0.0tolowaverageeffect)onallmeasures

•  EffectsizedistribuAonsareheterogeneous;someDE>>CI,someDE<<CI

•  Generallypoormethodologicalquality•  PedagogicalstudyfeaturesaccountformorevariaAonthanmediastudyfeatures(Clark,1994)

•  InteracAveDEanimportantvariable*

12

*Lou, Y., Bernard, R.M., & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(2), 141-176.

Page 13: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Summaryofresults:Achievement

13

Achievement Outcomes

*Significantly heterogeneous average effect

Page 14: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Summaryofresults:Amtudes

14

Attitude Outcomes

*Significantly heterogeneous average effect

Page 15: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Summaryofresults:RetenAon

15

Retention Outcomes

*Significantly heterogeneous effect sizes

Page 16: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Equivalency:ArealltypesofInteracAonnecessary?

Anderson, 2003 IRRODL

Page 17: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Anderson’sEquivalencyTheorem(2003)

Moore(1989)disAncAonsare:  ThreetypesofinteracAon

o  student‐studentinteracAono  student‐teacherinteracAono  Student‐contentinteracAon

Anderson(2003)hypothesesstate:

  Highlevelsofoneoutof3interacAonswillproducesaAsfyingeducaAonalexperience

  IncreasingsaAsfacAonthroughteacherandlearnerinteracAoninteracAonmaynotbeasAmeorcost‐effecAveasstudent‐contentinteracAvelearningsequences

17

Page 18: Social Software Research For Aahrus

DothethreetypesofinteracAondiffer?Moore’sdisAncAons

18

Achievement and Attitude Outcomes

Achievement Attitudes Interaction Categories k g+adj. k g+adj. Student-Student 10 0.342 6 0.358 Student-Teacher 44 0.254 30 0.052 Student-Content 20 0.339 8 0.136 Total 74 0.291 44 0.090 Between-class 2.437 6.892*

Moore’s distinctions seem to apply for achievement (equal importance), but not for attitudes (however, samples are low for SS and SC)

Page 19: Social Software Research For Aahrus

DoesstrengtheninginteracAonimproveachievementandamtudes?Anderson’shypotheses

19

Anderson’s first hypothesis about achievement appears to be supported

Anderson’s second hypothesis about satisfaction (attitude) appears to be supported, but only to an extent (i.e., only 5 studies in High Category)

Achievement and Attitude Outcomes

Achievement Attitudes Interaction Strength k g+adj. SE k g+adj. SE Low Strength 30 0.163 0.043 21 0.071 0.042 Med Strength 29 0.418 0.044 18 0.170 0.043 High Strength 15 0.305 0.062 5 -0.173 0.091 Total 74 0.291 0.027 44 0.090 0.029 (Q) Between-class 17.582* 12.060*

Page 20: Social Software Research For Aahrus

 Bernard,Abrami,Borokhovski,Wade,Tamin,&Surkes,(inpress).ExaminingThreeFormsofInteracAoninDistanceEducaAon:AMeta‐AnalysisofBetween‐DEStudies.ReviewofResearchinEduca2on

Page 21: Social Software Research For Aahrus

BecausesocialsoFwareuseissoemergentneedfor

•  Demographicstudies– Whoisusingwhatfordoingwhat?

– HowaretheyusingmulA‐usetools?

•  VisualizaAonofacAvityandrelaAonships•  Networkanalysis•  ConnecAonbetweencontextandtypeofuse•  Datamining

Page 22: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QuanAtaAveSummary

•  CanbeusefulespeciallywhenfinetuningwellestablishedpracAce

•  Providesincrementalgainsinknowledge,notrevoluAonaryones

•  Theneedto“control”contextoFenmakesresultsofliclevaluetopracAcingprofessionals

•  InAmesofrapidchangetooearlyquanAtaAvetesAngmaymaskbeneficialposiAvecapacity

•  Willweeverbeabletoaffordblindreviewed,randomassignmentstudies?

Page 23: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Paradigm2QualitaAveParadigm

•  ManydifferentvarieAes•  GenerallyanswerthequesAon‘why’ratherthen‘what’or‘howmuch’?

•  PresentsspecialchallengesindistributedcontextsduetodistancebetweenparAcipantsandresearchers

•  CurrentlymostcommontypeofDEresearch(RourkeandSzabo,2002)

Page 24: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QualitaAvestudyofSocialSoFware

•  CriAcallyimportant:–  InearlystagesofadopAon– Totrackeffectsofusercompetenceandefficacy– Ascontextsarepersonalized–  astoolsareappropriatedbyusersforenArelydifferenttasksthanthoseintendedbydevelopers

Page 25: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QualitaAveExample

– Dearnley(2003)Student support in open learning: Sustaining the Process

– PracAcingNurses,weeklyF2Ftutorialsessions

– Phenomenologicalstudyusinggroundedtheorydiscourse

Page 26: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Corecategorytoemergewas“Findingtheprofessionalvoice”

Page 27: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QualitaAveexample2

•  Mann,S.(2003)Apersonalinquiryintoanexperienceofadultlearningon‐line.Instruc8onalScience31

•  Conclusions:–  TheneedtofacilitatethepresentaAonoflearnerandteacher

idenAAesinsuchawaythattakesaccountofthelossofthenormalchannel

–  TheneedtomakeexplicitthedevelopmentofoperaAngnormsandconvenAons

–  reducedcommunicaAvemediathereisthepotenAalforgreatermisunderstanding

–  Theneedtoconsiderwaysinwhichthedevelopinglearningcommunitycanbeopentotheotherofuncertainty,ambiguityanddifference

Page 28: Social Software Research For Aahrus

3rdParadigmCriAcalResearch

•  Askswhogainsinpower?•  DavidNoble’scriAqueof‘digitaldiplomaMills’mostprominentCanadianexample

•  AreprofitsgeneratedfromusergeneratedcontentexploitaAve?

•  ConfronAngthe“netchangeseverything”mantraofmanysocialsoFwareproponents.

•  WhoisbeingexcludedfromsocialsoFware

Page 29: Social Software Research For Aahrus

IstheextracAonofinformaAonfromthemasses

exploitaAveorempowering?

Page 30: Social Software Research For Aahrus

•  WhydoesFacebookownallthecontentthatwesupply?

•  Doesthepowerofthenetfurthermarginalizethenonconnected?

•  Whobenefitsfromvoluntarydisclosure?

•  WhydidtheOneLaptopPerChildfail?

Page 31: Social Software Research For Aahrus

QuanAtaAvevs.QualitaAveParadigmWarsRekindled

•  Currentresearch“moreresemblesthependulumswingscharacterisAcofartorfashion,ratherthantheprogressiveimprovementscharacterisAcofscienceandtechnology”(p.16).•  Slavin(2002)inEducaAonalResearcher

•  SoluAontoembrace“evidencebasedlearning”•  Projectedtoincreasefrom5%to75%ofUSGov.fundingby2007for“researchthataddressescausalquesAonsandusesrandomassignments….”Slavin,2002p.15

Page 32: Social Software Research For Aahrus

DoEitherQualitaAveorQuanAtaAveMethodsMeetRealNeedsofPracAcing

DistanceEducators?

Page 33: Social Software Research For Aahrus

ButwhattypeofresearchhasmosteffectonpracAce?

– Kennedy (1999) - teachers rate relevance and value of results from each of major paradigms.

– No consistent results – teachers are not a homogeneous group of consumers but they do find research of value

– “The studies that teachers found to be most persuasive, most relevant, and most influential to their thinking were all studies that addressed the relationship between teaching and learning.”

Page 34: Social Software Research For Aahrus

ButwhattypeofresearchhasmosteffectonPracAce?

– “The findings from this study cast doubt on virtually every argument for the superiority of any particular research genre, whether the criterion for superiority is persuasiveness, relevance, or ability to influence practitioners’ thinking.” Kennedy, (1999)

Page 35: Social Software Research For Aahrus

4thParadigmDesign‐BasedResearch

•  Relatedtoengineeringandarchitecturalresearch

•  Focusesonthedesign,construcAon,implementaAonandadopAonofalearninginiAaAveinanauthenAccontext

•  Relatedto‘DevelopmentResearch’

•  Closesteducatorshavetoa“homegrown”researchmethodology

Page 36: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Design‐BasedResearchStudies

– iterative, – process focused, – interventionist, – collaborative, – multileveled, – utility oriented, – theory driven and generative

•  (Shavelson et al, 2003)

Page 37: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Design‐basedresearch•  Methodologydevelopedbyeducatorsfor

educators•  DevelopedfromAmericanpragmaAsm–Dewey

(Anderson,2005)•  RecentThemeIssues:

–  TheJournaloftheInstruc1onalSciences,(13,1,2004),–  Educa1onalResearcher(32,1,2003)and–  Educa8onalPsychologist(39,4,2004)–  Seebibliographyat

hKp://cider.athabascau.ca/CIDERSIGs/DesignBasedSIG/

•  Myar8cleatwww.cjlt.ca/abstracts.html

Page 38: Social Software Research For Aahrus

IntegraAveLearningDesign(Bannan‐Ritland,2003)

Page 39: Social Software Research For Aahrus

•  “design‐basedresearchenablesthecreaAonandstudyoflearningcondiAonsthatarepresumedproducAvebutarenotwellunderstoodinpracAce,andthegeneraAonoffindingsoFenoverlookedorobscuredwhenfocusingexclusivelyonthesummaAveeffectsofanintervenAon”Wang&Hannafin,2003

Page 40: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Wang and Hannafin, 2003

Page 41: Social Software Research For Aahrus

•  IteraAvebecause•  ‘InnovaAonisnotrestrictedtothepriordesignofanartefact,butconAnuesasartefactsareimplementedandused”

•  ImplementaAonsare“ineviAtablyunfinished”(StewartandWilliams(2005”

Page 42: Social Software Research For Aahrus

DesignBasedresearchandtheScienceofComplexity

•  ComplexitytheorystudiestheemergenceoforderinmulAfaceted,changingandpreviouslyunorderedcontexts

•  ThisemergingorderbecomesthefocusofiterateintervenAonsandevaluaAons

•  Orderemergesatthe“edgeofchaos”inresponsetorapidchange,andfailureofpreviousorganizaAonmodels

Page 43: Social Software Research For Aahrus

D‐BResearchexamples

Design-Based Research Strategies for Studying Situated Learning in a Multi-user Virtual Environment Chris Dede, 2004

Page 44: Social Software Research For Aahrus

•  Needtostudyusability,scalabilityandinnovaAonadopAonwithinbureaucraAcsystems

•  AllowknowledgetoolstoevolveinnaturalcontextthroughsupporAvenourishmentofstaff

Page 45: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Groundedtheory

•  Theneedfortheoryandmodelbuilding•  “ThereisnothingsopracAcalasagoodtheory”

•  Weneedmodelsandtheoriesnowtoguidetherapiddeploymentthatistakingplace

•  Bebraveandexpansiveinyourconclusions

Page 46: Social Software Research For Aahrus

ReasonsforCriAcalMassinNetworksofPracAce

Landquvist &Teigland, 2007

Page 47: Social Software Research For Aahrus

PersonalAcademicuseofsocialsoFware

•  Docreateablogtodocumentyourresearchjourney

•  Followblogsofthoseyouadmire

•  Selfarchiveandonlygiveyourcopyrightawayunderunusualcircumstances

•  Supportopenaccessjournalsiewww.irrodl.org

Page 48: Social Software Research For Aahrus

FinalHints

•  SubscribetoIRRODLwww.irrodl.org•  CustomizeGoogleScholartoscanyourlibraryconnecAonswww.googlescholar.com

•  SubscribetomyblogtheVirtualCanuckatterrya.edublogs.org

Page 49: Social Software Research For Aahrus

Conclusion

•  EducaAonresearchisgrosslyunder‐resourcedtomeetthemagnitudeofopportunityanddemand

•  ParadigmwarsareunproducAve•  Design‐basedresearchoffersapromisingnewresearchdesignmodel

•  ThesemanAcwebofferspromiseofgreatlyenhancedcollaboraAonandresearchdisseminaAon