student evaluation of teaching at lakehead university 2012 ... · student evaluation of teaching at...

Office of Institutional Analysis/Government Relations

Student Evaluation of Teaching at Lakehead University 2012/13 Results Attached are results of the Student Evaluation of Teaching at Lakehead University conducted in Fall/Winter 2012/13. Included are: 1. Figures for the University overall showing aggregate data for each question (1 to 23) on

the survey. Students continue to express a high level of satisfaction overall with 80% of students who strongly agree / agree that they would recommend their instructor, and 78% of students who strongly agree / agree that they would recommend their course.

2. The aggregate frequency and percentage data for the University. 3. A copy of the survey instrument.

2012/13 Student Evaluation of Teaching at Lakehead University - (Fall/Winter)Lakehead University Summary Results

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Comprehensive course outline was provided#1

A score of 1 = strongly disagreeA score of 5 = strongly agree

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Learning objectives were clearly presented#2


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Course content matched course outline#3


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Course materials promoted learning of course concepts#4


Institutional Analysis Eval of Teaching_Overall_FINAL_1213


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor encouraged student participation#5


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor responded to questions in respectful manner#6


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor respected diversity among students#7


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor clearly explained course concepts#8




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructional methods enhanced student learning#9


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor monitored student learning#10


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor appeared enthusiastic about teaching course#11


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor accessible to students outside class#12




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor appeared well prepared for class#13


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Course was appropriately challenging#14


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Course was stimulating#15


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Acquired new knowledge as a result of course#16




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Knowledge from class applicable to other situations#17


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Instructor provided opportunities to develop analytical skills#18


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Graded materials aligned with course objectives#19


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Timely feedback on graded materials#20




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Feedback on graded materials was valuable#21


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Overall, would recommend this instructor#22


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4 5

Per

cent

age

Scoring

Overall, would recommend this course#23



Lakehead University Student Evaluation of Teaching SUMMARY REPORT for Fall 2012/Winter 2013 Evaluations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Frequency 39277 39206 39168 39042 39020 39006 38500 39056 39096 38882 39072 38234 1 380 613 504 882 734 729 358 1104 1664 1392 706 635 2 940 1928 1300 2231 1737 1302 405 2541 3295 3308 1135 1149 3 1374 3082 2847 4081 4201 2605 2299 4053 5569 7042 2926 5490 4 14751 16413 16158 15510 13371 13063 12157 14895 13755 13618 12616 14144 5 21832 17170 18359 16338 18977 21307 23281 16463 14813 13522 21689 16816 Mean 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.4 4.2 Not Applicable 51 46 105 142 110 93 712 79 89 259 86 834 Total Responses 39328 39252 39273 39184 39130 39099 39212 39135 39185 39141 39158 39068 Percentage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 1.0 1.6 1.3 2.3 1.9 1.9 .9 2.8 4.3 3.6 1.8 1.7 2 2.4 4.9 3.3 5.7 4.5 3.3 1.1 6.5 8.4 8.5 2.9 3.0 3 3.5 7.9 7.3 10.5 10.8 6.7 6.0 10.4 14.2 18.1 7.5 14.4 4 37.6 41.9 41.3 39.7 34.3 33.5 31.6 38.1 35.2 35.0 32.3 37.0 5 55.6 43.8 46.9 41.8 48.6 54.6 60.5 42.2 37.9 34.8 55.5 44.0 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Q21 Q22 Q23 Frequency 38999 39012 39059 39064 39134 38974 38696 38377 38053 38982 38941 1 590 1105 1963 889 929 1008 1016 1340 1485 1680 1701 2 1070 2062 3177 1406 1891 2269 1659 2427 2700 1863 2357 3 2559 4266 5634 2847 5053 6593 4303 4430 6051 3758 4615 4 14109 15836 13888 15820 15427 15088 16275 15014 13736 11894 13375 5 20671 15743 14397 18102 15834 14016 15443 15166 14081 19787 16893 Mean 4.4 4.1 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.1 Not Applicable 174 70 98 66 99 210 364 604 895 94 165 Total Responses 39173 39082 39157 39130 39233 39184 39060 38981 38948 39076 39106 Percentage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 1.5 2.8 5.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.4 2 2.7 5.3 8.1 3.6 4.8 5.8 4.3 6.3 7.1 4.8 6.1 3 6.6 10.9 14.4 7.3 12.9 16.9 11.1 11.5 15.9 9.6 11.9 4 36.2 40.6 35.6 40.5 39.4 38.7 42.1 39.1 36.1 30.5 34.3 5 53.0 40.4 36.9 46.3 40.5 36.0 39.9 39.5 37.0 50.8 43.4 Scores Q1 to Q23 - (5) Strongly Agree (4) Somewhat Agree (3) Neutral (2) Somewhat Disagree (1) Strongly Disagree

Lakehead University Fall 2012/Winter 2013 Evaluations

student evaluation of teaching at lakehead university 2012 ... · student evaluation of teaching at...

Documents