technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies
DESCRIPTION
Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies. Ann C. Smith University of Maryland College Park MD. PKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado. What is Active learning?. In groups – introduce your self and give one example of active learning (5 minutes) Writing Discussion - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning
pedagogies...
Ann C. Smith
University of Maryland
College Park MDPKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado
11/22/03 PKAL
What is Active learning?
In groups – introduce your self and give one example of active learning (5 minutes)
• Writing
• Discussion
• Presentations
• Inquiry projects
• Problem Based Learning
11/22/03 PKAL
Our Goal- introduce more active learning in
our large lecture course
• General Microbiology (BSCI 223)– Introductory course General Bio Pre-requisite.– 250 students per lecture section– 1- 2 lecture sections per semester– Lab component– 1 Graduate TA/ 2 lab sections of 18 students – 1 faculty member/lecture section– 1 faculty member to oversee lab instruction
11/22/03 PKAL
What is involved in adding active learning?
• Organization – – Distribution and collection of materials– Opportunities for individual and group participation
• Communication– Faculty – student – Student - student
• Time– Instructor time– Class time
11/22/03 PKAL
Barriers to Active learning in large classes?
1. Organization factor increases.
2. Communication opportunities decrease.
3. Time factor increases.
Can the use of Technology provide solutions?
11/22/03 PKAL
Technology as a solutionWebCT
1. Organization• Distribution of course materials
– Syllabus, – Assignments,– Lecture outlines, – Power points,– Lab Manual,– Grades
Student Comments:
11/22/03 PKAL
Technology as a solution
2. Communication– Announcements– Public Discussion space for open question and
answer– Private discussion space for group work or
communication with specific groups– On-line quizzing to provide feedback and to
assess student knowledge.
11/22/03 PKAL
3. Time
• A new course learning environment– Lecture– Lab– On-line
Technology as a solution
11/22/03 PKAL
Technology ~Value added
Outlines can be linked to online resources
Availability 24 hours.
Time release (Guide students)
Exposure to technology
Easy to update
Opportunities to engage students with different learning styles
Potential to engage students in new ways
Can Traditionally Designed Courses Be Transformed Using Technology?
Traditional lecture/lab course
Active Learning Environment
Technology
11/22/03 PKAL
Our biggest challenge: Discussion
Assignment: Work in Groups to create parameters for a
discussion supported by technology. The class: 250 students2 – one hour lectures, 2 two hour labs/week2 faculty: lecturer and lab coordinator, 1 TA
for every 2 sections of 18 students.Online environment - WebCT
11/22/03 PKAL
Discussion parameters:
• enriches learning experience– use of vocabulary– Reinforces content/concepts from lab and
lecture and asks students to incorporate prior learning.
– Supports a constructivist approach to learning• (requires students to research either in lab or
in library)• in a manner that prepares students to be scientists
11/22/03 PKAL
Design
• Must include methods to– motivate students to participate– measure participation– moderate/facilitate /model a fruitful discussion.– evaluate individual participation– evaluate success of discussion.– Assess learning.
11/22/03 PKAL
Evaluate Your Design
• Rate 1 – 5
• Lecture or lab time requirement?
• Student training?
• Faculty intensive?
• Technology support requirement?
• Monetary cost?
• Learning benefit?
11/22/03 PKAL
UM Design
Two methods both employ Case Studies
1. In lecture discussion• Case study and Problems posted online
• Students provide solutions to problems online
• Lecturer reads answers, prepares discussion
• Discussion in lecture – open class and think pair share.
• Students receive participation points
• Assessment via exam questions.
UM Design
2. On-line Discussion
1 1 1 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 23 3 3 3 3 3
3 groups of 6 students/ lab
Discussion moderated by an Undergraduate TA
•Over a one month period student are required to post 6 times to the discussion
•Participation and quality of posts and group discussion are assessed
•Coupled with writing assignment where students resort into 6 groups of 3.
11/22/03 PKAL
• Time – 15 min/ lecture discussionstudents – one hour prep?Faculty – 2 hour prep, 2 hour initial set up
• WebCT quiz tool• Student Training• Learning – Challenges misconceptions,
supports learning goals, practice writing, use of vocabulary
In Lecture Discussion - Evaluation
11/22/03 PKAL
• Time – references in lecture/lab– On –line – one month– Meet with UTA’s weekly for the semester– 8 hours to review UTA assessments– 8 hours set up
• Additional personnel – 1 UTA/section, Tech TA’s• WebCT discussion space• Student Training• Learning – supports constructivist learning
Online discussion - Evaluation
11/22/03 PKAL
Labs linked to lectures/cases
LECTURE
LABON-line
LAB
18 students/TA
LECTURE
250 students/instructor
Presentation of Content Hands on Activities
a.
b.
11/22/03 PKAL
Labs linked to lectures/cases
LECTURE
LABON-line
LAB
18 students/TA
LECTURE
250 students/instructor
Presentation of Content Hands on Activities
a.
b.
11/22/03 PKAL
Labs linked to lectures/cases
LECTURE
LABON-line
LAB
18 students/TA
LECTURE
250 students/instructor
Presentation of Content Hands on Activities
a.
b.
ACTIVE LEARNING COURSE
Lecture, lab and online goals are complementary
Traditionally Designed Course
11/22/03 PKAL
Labs linked to lectures/cases
Directed Discussions LECTURELectures linked to labs/cases
LABTeam work, lab reports, presentationsLabs linked to lectures/cases
ON-line
Discussion
Links: resources, lecture outlines
Course information
Case studies PAK questions
Lab quizzes and lab manual
Surveys
Grades
Poster session
LAB
18 students/TA
LECTURE
250 students/instructor
Presentation of Content Hands on Activities
a.
b.
11/22/03 PKAL
Concerns
Access to computer
Training
Technology support on campus
Students expectations for immediate feedback
Faculty
11/22/03 PKAL
Acknowledgements
• Robert Yuan, Rick Stewart, Patty Shields• Paulette Robinson• Department of Cell Biology and Molecular
Genetics• College of Life Sciences• Undergraduate Technology Apprentice
Program• Office of Information Technology
11/22/03 PKAL
Course Transformation?
Assignment • Learning goal: role of microbes in
production of a product via biotechnology– Bacterial genetics– Genetic engineering
• Course time – 2 weeks, 4 lecture periods of 50 min each, 4 lab periods of 2 hours each
• Student plays the role of a research scientist
Outcome: student learns basic concepts as well as current notions and approaches
• Resources for students: Lab, lecture, text, prior learning, access to online data bases and digital libraries +…
• Incorporates Active learning– Discussion– Team work– Individual participation– Writing– Problem solving
• Includes – Mechanism for feedback to the student– Assessment piece
11/22/03 PKAL
3 On-line Discussion Groups per lab section