the backside of betrayal

of 61 /61

Author: justin-imel

Post on 13-May-2015




2 download

Embed Size (px)


Joseph is sold to Egyptian bondage by his brothers. This episode teaches us much about how God can bring good even out of the most black of situations.


Page 1: The Backside of Betrayal
Page 2: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph is one of the most intriguing sections of


Joseph’s brothers despise him and sell him into slavery.

Yet, Joseph forgives his brothers.

Joseph fully surrendered his life to God at an early age.

Therefore, God was able to use Joseph in a major way to advance

His kingdom.

Had Joseph and his brothers died in famine, God would not have

been able to fulfill His promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

The issues of faith that plagued Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob

do not appear in Joseph’s life.

Joseph arguably had a much harder life than Abraham, Isaac, or


Moses illustrates what a faith-full life would look like.

Page 3: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph’s brothers hated him, because:

He brings an evil report of his brothers Dan, Naphtali, Gad,

and Asher to his father (v 2).

His father shows him partiality by giving him the infamous

coat (vv 3-4).

He has two dreams (of the eleven sheaves, and of the sun,

moon, and eleven stars) which suggest that he is to be

exalted above the rest of the family (vv 5-11).

How might Joseph have handled his brothers


Do we ever seriously hurt relationships over perceived


How might we keep from doing so?

Page 4: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph, the Beloved of His


Genesis 37:1-7

Page 5: The Backside of Betrayal

“Jacob dwelt in the land where his father was a

stranger, in the land of Canaan” (v 1).

Moses reminds us again that the patriarchs were aliens on

the earth.

Heb 11:8-16 and Phil 3:17-21 connect this to the Christian life.

We, as the people of God, are strangers on this earth.

How do we show we are aliens?

Do we sometimes get too comfy with this world?

How do we keep from getting too comfy?

Not only were Jacob a “stranger,” but he was an alien in


The mention of Canaan reminds us of the promise of God.

Jacob’s descendants would inherit the land.

How can we have confidence in God’s promises?

Page 6: The Backside of Betrayal

“This is the history of Jacob.”

The rest of Genesis is the history of Jacob.

Yes, the special emphasis throughout the text is on Joseph, but

Jacob’s burial doesn’t occur until the end of the Book.

Why do you think that Moses, through the Spirit, spent so much

space on Jacob?

My opinion:

The Jacob/Joseph narrative demonstrates how God providentially saved the

nation of Israel and His scheme of redemption.

If God had allowed this family to die in the famine, He could not fulfill His promise

to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Instead, we see the lengths God goes through to fulfill His promise.

The lesson is two-fold:

God is faithful!

God may work in our lives in ways we do not understand.

Page 7: The Backside of Betrayal

At the age of 17, Joseph is feeding the flock with his

brothers, and he brought back “a bad report of them

[Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher]” to Jacob.

Throughout the Old Testament, this Hebrew term refers to a

message that is at best derogatory, and at worst deceitfully


God has commanded that we not speak in such a manner.

“You shall not go about as a talebearer among your people” (Lev


“He who goes about as a talebearer reveals secrets; Therefore do

not associate with one who flatters with his lips” (Prov 20:19).

Page 8: The Backside of Betrayal

Why might Joseph have wanted to gossip against these

four brothers?

What might he have gained?

Why might people today gossip?

What might be gained through gossip?

What might be lost through gossip?

Page 9: The Backside of Betrayal

Rabban Simon ben Gamaliel once ordered his servant

to bring from the market the best thing to be found

there. To the good rabbi's surprise he brought a tongue.

At another time the rabbi commanded him to bring the

worst thing the market could offer. To his still greater

surprise the servant again brought a tongue. “How is

this?” the master asked. “When I bad thee bring the

best thing the marked provided, thou didst bring a

tongue. And now that I have ordered the worst thing,

thou dost still bring a tongue?”

Page 10: The Backside of Betrayal

“Good master,” answered the wise servant, “dost thou

not know that a tongue may be either the best or the

worst thing in the world accordingly as its owner uses


Page 11: The Backside of Betrayal

It seems that Joseph’s tongue gets him into a good bit

of trouble.

There is the bad report he brought against four of his


There is also the telling of the dreams.

Joseph couldn’t help that He had these dreams.

God gave Joseph the dreams.

God, in His bountiful wisdom, gave Joseph these dreams.

However, Joseph didn’t have to tell everything he knew.

The text doesn’t say so, but I can imagine that Joseph

flaunted his favored position.

The wearing of the coat to go visit his brothers seems to indicate


Page 12: The Backside of Betrayal

Israel (Jacob) loved Joseph more than all his children.

Of course, Israel had seen that favoritism in his own parents.

I think this should stand as a warning to all of us parents

about what we’re passing on to our children.

Page 13: The Backside of Betrayal

Israel gave Joseph “a tunic of many colors.”

That translation has been flatly rejected by most scholars.

The LXX translated the Hebrew this way, and many English

translations have followed suit.

We see the multicolored coat in Sunday school curriculum (I even

searched for an image of a multicolored coat for the PowerPoint).

The Hebrew almost certainly does not mean this, but the

Hebrew is not precisely clear.

The Hebrew might mean an ornamental robe.

The idea would be that it was a special robe that separated Joseph from

his brothers.

However, most scholars today believe the Hebrew really means “a

long robe with sleeves.”

Page 14: The Backside of Betrayal

“Long robe with sleeves.”

The robe with long sleeves could refer to a royal robe.

The only other occurrence of this expression is in the narrative of

Amnon’s rape of Tamar (2 Sam 13:18-19).

Tamar “had a robe of many colors, for the king’s virgin daughters

wore such apparel” (2 Sam 13:18).

The sleeves might indicate that Joseph was not expected to

work in the fields like his brothers.

Workers wore short garments with short sleeves so that their arms

could be free to work.

Joseph worked with his brothers (v 2) at one point, but when the

brothers went to Shechem Joseph stayed behind (vv 12ff).

Page 15: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph’s brothers hated him and could not speak

peaceably to him.

We sometimes talk very casually about hating things (e.g.,

certain teams or foods).

“Hate” in Hebrew refers to a deed or the inception of a deed.

Just like we might talk about love as action, hate, in this manner, is

also action.

Thus, when we find that Joseph’s brothers hated him, we should

expect to find a corresponding action.

Page 16: The Backside of Betrayal

Is there a great deal of hatred in the world today?

What are some examples of hate that we find?

How can we get rid of hate in this world?

Obviously, following Jesus is absolutely the only way that we can

get rid of hate.

What are some things that He taught us that are the antidote to


Page 17: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph had a dream, told it to his brothers, and they

hated him even more.

The dreams indicate that God is directing Joseph’s life.

There can be little doubt but that these dreams are a divine


I further believe that Joseph understood the dreams to be a divine


Even Joseph’s brothers understood the meaning of the dreams: “Shall you

indeed reign over us?” (v 8).

However, what did Joseph gain by telling his brothers these


Are there ever times that the wise thing is to keep our mouths


Page 18: The Backside of Betrayal

The dreams indicated a unique position for Joseph.

“Your sheaves stood all around and bowed down to my


“The sun, the moon, and the eleven stars bowed down to


In other words, this was not a case where the meaning

of the dreams could be in anyway ambiguous.

Notice that twice the narrative tells us that the brothers hated

Joseph even more (v 5, 8) because of the dreams.

That’s very interesting, because:

Page 19: The Backside of Betrayal

The dreams, the telling of them, and the hatred of the

brothers all work for the unfolding purpose of God.

This serves as a reminder that the will of God cannot be

thwarted even by sin.

In the case of Joseph (as with Jesus), sin helps move God’s

purpose along.

The brothers’ hatred was clearly wrong.

Their selling Joseph into Egyptian bondage was wrong.

The advances of Potiphar’s wife were wrong.

The lying of Potiphar’s wife that led to Joseph’s being wrongly

imprisoned was wrong.

Page 20: The Backside of Betrayal

However, through all that sin, the purpose of a God who

cannot be touched with sin was fulfilled.

I cannot even begin to fathom how God could do that.

Yet, I believe He can do that because He is a “BIG” God.

He has all power, He has infinite wisdom, He has a perfect will, etc.

This should leave us with an unshakeable calmness as we rest in

the will of God.

The world is very chaotic as we meet tonight (07.23.14).

There is a war in Ukraine & a plane that has been shot down.

There is war in the Middle East.

There is a sluggish economy here in the United States.

Yet through all of that, God is moving everything to be subdued in Christ (1

Cor 15:25-28; Eph 1:10; Phil 2:9-11).

Page 21: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph Hated and Rejected by His


Genesis 37:8-19

Page 22: The Backside of Betrayal

The mention of eleven stars in verse 9 indicates that

Benjamin had been born when Joseph was sold into


Joseph also asked a leading question about Benjamin (Gen


Some scholars have suggested that Benjamin was not born

until after Joseph was sold into slavery.

Jacob’s mention of “your mother” at v 10 is difficult to understand.

Rachel died giving birth to Benjamin (35:16-21).

Because of the traveling sequence given, it seems very unlikely that this is

out of chronological order.

Some have suggested that Leah or Rachel’s maid Bilhah was

regarded as Joseph’s mother after the death of Rachel.

Page 23: The Backside of Betrayal

Jacob rebuked Joseph for the dreams (v 10).

It could be that Jacob rebuked Joseph for the telling of the


However, the wording of verse 10--“What is this dream that

you have dreamed? Shall your mother and I and your

brothers indeed come to bow down to the earth before

you?”--really makes me think that Jacob was rebuking him

for the dreams themselves.

Why would Jacob rebuke Joseph for something over which Joseph

had no control?

Are there ever times that we rebuke when we shouldn’t?

How might we know when to rebuke and when not to rebuke?

Are there appropriate ways to rebuke?

Page 24: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph’s brothers envied him.

What is the difference between hatred and envy?

Why might Joseph’s brothers have been envious of him?

Why is envy harmful to the Christian?

Prov 14:30.

1 Cor 13:4.

Gal 5:26.

Joseph’s father “kept the matter in mind.”

Why might Jacob have “kept the matter in mind”?

Can you think of anyone else who kept matters in mind?

Page 25: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph’s brothers go to feed their father’s flock in


Shechem is about 50 miles north of Hebron.

This journey could have taken 2½ days if they were able to

walk 20 miles a day which was common.

I would imagine, however, that the sheep would have slowed them

down a good bit.

Jacob sent Joseph to check on his brothers.

Isn’t this a case where a cell phone would have come in


Even if this journey had gone as Jacob expected, the

journey there and back would have taken at least a week.

Page 26: The Backside of Betrayal

It is quite possible that Jacob wants Joseph to check on

his brothers because of the massacre Simeon and Levi

carried out in Shechem because their sister Dinah was

violated (Gen 34).

Jacob was concerned when that massacre occurred that the

Canaanites and Perizzites would carry out retribution (Gen


If Jacob is worried. . .

That the Canaanites and Perizzites would carry out retribution, it

would be difficult seeing him sending Joseph.

That Simeon, Levi, and the other eight might carry out more

vengeance, it would be easy to see Jacob sending Joseph.

We know of his willingness to bring a bad report to his father (v 2).

Page 27: The Backside of Betrayal

When Joseph gets to Shechem, he discovers that his

brothers are in Dothan, fifteen miles farther north.

The brothers could see Joseph coming “even before he

came near them.”

Obviously the coat he was wearing allowed them to see him.

When they see Joseph, they say, “Look, this dreamer is


The phrase in Hebrew literally means “master of dreams.”

The Heb phrase was commonly used with many traits and means “to

represent a person (poetically even a thing) as possessing some object or

quality, or being in some condition(.”

E.g., “masters of arrows” (Gen 49:23) are archers, “a master of the lending

of the hand” (Deut 15:2) is a creditor, “a master of the tongue” (Eccl 10:11)

is a charmer, “a master of two wings” (Eccl 10:20) is a bird, etc.

Page 28: The Backside of Betrayal

While the coat and their father’s favoritism caused the

ten brothers to hate Joseph, it appears as though the

dreams were the final straw.

The dreams could have been the “final straw” for a

couple reasons.

One: They may generally hate the idea that this bratty kid is

going to have any power of them.

They may not have believed the dreams, but the implication of the

dreams was quite obvious.

Two: They may have generally hated the idea that God

would elevate Joseph to such a position.

They may have believed the dreams and been angry that God

would elevate Joseph.

Page 29: The Backside of Betrayal

Are there any times when we get angry at God because

He (seemingly) blesses others better than He blesses


Does God bless us equally?

There are many who see God’s hand in every single thing

that happens (“Everything happens for a reason”).

I would flatly deny that is the case.

However, does God need to justify to me what He does?

Page 30: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph Cast into the Pit

Genesis 37:20-27

Page 31: The Backside of Betrayal

When the brothers saw the master of dreams, they

conspired against him to kill him.

The same Hebrew word is used here as was used in the

case of Cain and Abel.

They did not intend simply to kill him, but they planned to do so in a

gruesome, grizzly manner.

This demonstrates to us how much sin was in their hearts.

They would say that a wild beast had devoured their brother.

The Hebrew word for “wild” can mean “sinful” or “wicked” in some

contexts and “harmful” or “punishing” in others.

The idea then would be a harmful, wild, unrestrained beast.

Page 32: The Backside of Betrayal

What does it take for a person to plot murder?

In this case, it’s not just that one person plots murder, but

nine do.

Only Reuben was opposed to the murder.

He may have still had some love for his younger brother; maybe

Joseph occupied a “warm place” in Reuben’s heart.

It may have been to get back in his father’s good graces because

of his earlier indiscretion (35:22).

Some have also said that while Reuben hated his brother, he may

have felt that murder was simply wrong.

Page 33: The Backside of Betrayal

After committing Joseph’s murder, the ten brothers plan

to throw Joseph into a pit.

What is a pit?

A pit at this time in the Middle East was 6-24 feet in depth.

The purpose was to collect rain water during the rainy season.

The rest of the year these cisterns would be quite dry.

Joseph’s brothers stripped him of his tunic “of many

colors” before casting him into the pit.

That symbol that the brothers hated so badly was stripped

away from Joseph.

Are there “symbols” that we might have that it would be wise

to strip from ourselves?

Page 34: The Backside of Betrayal

After stripping him of his garment, nine (Reuben has left

for some reason) brothers “cast him into a pit.”

The Hebrew word for “cast” or “throw” says more than it first


This verb with a person as the direct object “almost always refers

to the placing of a dead body in a grave” (2 Sam 18:17; 2 Ki 13:21;

Jer 41:9), “or to the placing of a living body into what is assumed

will be its grave” (21:15; Jer 38:6).

Therefore, it seems extremely likely that the brothers hoped

Joseph would soon be dead.

The idea that they hoped Joseph would die in the pit is

exemplified in the fact the brothers sat down to eat a meal (v


Page 35: The Backside of Betrayal

The nine brothers sat down to eat a meal.

This is absolutely incredulous!

They are so callous that that they are able to eat after what they

had done to Joseph.

I don’t know, but…

Is Joseph injured in some way?

Is he, therefore, screaming in agony.

The fact that he is sold as a slave to Potiphar indicates that any injury is fairly


Is Joseph pleading with them?

Is Joseph very uncomfortable (cold, wet, etc.) because he is nearly naked?

Page 36: The Backside of Betrayal

I cannot escape the irony.

The brothers sit down to eat.

A few years later, Joseph would be the reason they ate.

Why would Moses record the fact that they ate while

Joseph was in the pit?

One: I think it shows the hardness of the brothers’ hearts.

Two: I think it is purposefully mentioned to be

ironic/foreshadowing of things yet to come.

Page 37: The Backside of Betrayal

The nine brothers lifted their eyes and there was a

coming a company of Ishmaelites, coming from Gilead.

There is a fairly serious “problem” with the text at this point.

The company is identified in two different ways:

They are Ishmaelites (37:25), then Midianites (37:28), Ishmaelites

(37:28), Midianites (37:36), and then Ishmaelites (39:1) again.

Midian was descended from Abraham through Keturah, and

Ishmael through Hagar.

Which were they?

There are two serious attempts to solve this issue.

Page 38: The Backside of Betrayal

The first idea is that the author of Genesis used sources

and that the sources differed on the ethnicity of the


The idea of sources in Genesis became popular shortly after

the American Civil War (although there was some support

for this idea going back to the 1650’s).

The idea is that Moses did not write any of the Pentateuch,

but that someone (a redactor) put the five books together

from four different sources.

There are some issues with that theory.

The most serious issue is that other Old Testament authors, Jesus,

and the apostles all attribute the Law to Moses and declare that

Moses wrote the Law.

Page 39: The Backside of Betrayal

There is nothing in Scripture which says specifically

says that Moses wrote Genesis.

John 7:22 might, but Jesus could also be referring to Lev


However, there are reasons to believe that Moses wrote


The language of Genesis is very similar to Ex-Deut.

The author new Egyptian customs very well.

Exodus begins in Hebrew with the word “and,” which indicates a

previous book.

Page 40: The Backside of Betrayal

However, I have no problem with the idea that Moses

used sources.

Luke strongly implies that he used source material in writing

his Gospel (Lk 1:1-4).

I personally believe that the Holy Spirit guided Moses in

using sources for Genesis.

Yet, it seems to me a very far stretch to suggest that

within a couple sentences Moses switches back and

forth because he wasn’t certain the ethnicity of the


Some of these scholars treat the biblical authors as though

they were stupid hicks who couldn’t have found their way out

of a paper sack.

Page 41: The Backside of Betrayal

The second suggestion as to the identity of the caravan

is that Ishmaelite and Midianite were synonyms.

We don’t know how these two names became merged (they

descended from Abraham through different women, one

mistress and one wife).

The two terms are synonymous in Judges 8:22-26.

Page 42: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph Sold into Egypt

Genesis 37:26-36

Page 43: The Backside of Betrayal

Judah said to his brothers, “What profit is there if we kill

our brother and conceal his blood? Come and let us sell

him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon

him, for he is our brother and our flesh.”

Judah here talks about concealing Joseph’s blood.

Could they have concealed Joseph’s blood from God?

What are some examples of sins people believe they can hide from

God and others?

Why do people continue to think they can do this?

Page 44: The Backside of Betrayal

It might seem that Judah is being very humane in

suggesting that Joseph be sold instead of being killed.

Moses and his contemporaries might not have agreed.

In the 13th and 14th centuries BC, people in the Ancient Near East

(ANE) were commonly sold into Egyptian slavery as punishment

for various crimes, including defaulting on debts.

Because the demand for slaves became so high, people began

kidnapping others for sale as slaves (isn’t that kinda what’s

happening in this passage?).

Legislation was developed to keep that from happening.

The Code of Hammurabi prevented this.

Under the Law of Moses, this was a capital offense (Ex 21:16; Deut 24:7).

Therefore, Judah is encouraging something that would result

in death under the Law.

Page 45: The Backside of Betrayal

Dothan sat on a major trade route--the Via Maris--that

ran all the way to Egypt.

Therefore, there’s nothing surprising that these travelers on

the road headed to Egypt.

However, it seems without any doubt that Moses wants to

make clear that this is not a coincidence.

God is orchestrating every little part of Joseph’s life (the dreams,

the anonymous tipster, the caravan).

Nothing is happening by chance, but God is moving Joseph to

become a major player in the divine epic.

Page 46: The Backside of Betrayal

I believe that God providentially works in our lives, too.

“Are not five sparrows sold for two copper coins? And not

one of them is forgotten before God. But the very hairs of

your head are all numbered. Do not fear therefore; you are

of more value than many sparrows” (Lk 12:6-7).

I don’t know all that God does providentially.

We do not have a prophet to tell us what is and is not providential.

However, the Scriptures certainly teach that God cares for us and

helps us.

Page 47: The Backside of Betrayal

There are examples of God’s providential care

throughout the Testaments.


The Messiah’s birth.

“When the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son,

born of a woman, born under the law” (Gal 4:4).

Fullness of time:

Messianic expectation.

Roman peace (Pax Romana).

Common language throughout the world.

Roman system of roads.

What other examples would you add?

Page 48: The Backside of Betrayal

Joseph is sold for twenty shekels of silver.

This was the going rate at this time for slaves during this

period according to the Code of Hammurabi.

This was also the going rate under the Law of Moses to

redeem a male between the ages of 5 and 20 who had

consecrated himself to the LORD (Lev 27:5).

Ten shekels was the annual salary for a laborer during

this period of history.

Therefore, the brothers stood to make considerable money.

In my opinion, the money was probably divided nine ways.

Joseph would not have received any money; I can’t se Benjamin

getting any.

I doubt that Reuben would have received any.

Page 49: The Backside of Betrayal

When Reuben discovers that Joseph was not in the pit,

he tore his clothes.

The tearing of clothes in the ANE indicated deep grief.

I understand that Jews today continue this practice.

Why would Reuben be so distraught?

It would be extremely easy to judge his motives for his grief.

Maybe he wanted to get back in his dad’s good graces after his indiscretion

with Bilhah (Gen 35:22).

Perhaps Reuben really cared about his brother.

Maybe he simply did not believe it appropriate to take a life.

What problems occasionally develop because we judge someone’s


Page 50: The Backside of Betrayal

Reuben goes to his brothers and says, “The lad is no

more; and I, where shall I go?”

Why was Reuben concerned about where he would go?

He may have been concerned that his father would not welcome

him back.

I wonder, though, if he isn’t a little concerned about what happened

with Cain.

God to Cain: “A fugitive and a vagabond you shall be on the earth” (Gen


Maybe Reuben fears that YHWH will consign the ten of them to that same


Page 51: The Backside of Betrayal

The brothers take Joseph’s tunic and dip it in goat’s

blood; they then present the coat to Jacob.

There is a bit of horrible irony here.

Jacob had deceived his father with his brother’s coat and a goat

(Gen 27:15-16).

There is certainly much to be said about the seed that Jacob had


“Be sure your sin will find you out” (Num 2:23).

“Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he

will also reap” (Gal 6:7).

If God has forgiven us, why are there still consequences to sin?

What are some consequences that people face because of sin?

Page 52: The Backside of Betrayal

When the brothers present the cloak to Jacob, they say,

“We have found this. Do you know whether it is your

son’s tunic or not?”

They do not refer to Joseph by name or as their brother--

they refer to him as “your son.”

A couple other examples:

The lawyer at the end of the Parable of the Good Samaritan: “He who

showed mercy on him” (Lk 10:37).

The elder brother: “As soon as this son of yours came, who has devoured

your livelihood with harlots, you killed the fatted calf for him” (Lk 15:30).

It certainly seems that their hatred for Joseph prevented the

brothers from using Joseph’s name.

Do you think such hatred is common?

How might we rise above that type of hatred?

Page 53: The Backside of Betrayal

I find it interesting that in this narrative the brothers

don’t exactly “lie” with their mouths about Joseph’s fate.

The closest the brothers come to verbal lying is when they

say, “We have found this” (v 32).

It would depend on the definition of “found.”

Also, what I’m saying about lying would only apply to what Moses

recorded; we have no idea what else they might/might not have


This should really serve as a warning to us.

Lying does not need to be verbal.

What are some ways that we might lie through our actions?

How can we keep from lying through actions?

Page 54: The Backside of Betrayal

Jacob recognized his sons tunic and said, “A wild beast

has devoured him. Without doubt Joseph is torn to


The brothers allow Jacob to reach his own conclusion (a

conclusion they have carefully orchestrated).

It would be difficult to think about the pain your child would

go through in such a death.

Page 55: The Backside of Betrayal

Jacob tore his clothes, put sackcloth on his waist, and

mourned for Joseph many days.

Sackcloth was made of goat or camel hair and was coarse

and uncomfortable.

Think burlap.

Sackcloth was commonly worn as only a loin covering.

The official period of mourning was often 30 days.

However, the mourning period could continue as long as the

mourner chose to grieve.

It certainly seems that Jacob intended to go to his grave mourning

Joseph (v 35).

Page 56: The Backside of Betrayal

All his sons and daughters tried to comfort Jacob.

We only know of one daughter, Dinah.

Some think that Jacob had other daughters.

This doesn’t seem likely.

Some think that daughters means daughters-in-law.

Possible, but not probable.

Some believe “sons and daughters” is simply an idiom that means


However, it is likely that the Hebrew “daughters” can be used

generically to refer to one daughter or several daughters.

The plural is used at Gen 46:15 where Dinah is clearly the only daughter


Page 57: The Backside of Betrayal

Jacob refused to be comforted.

He took the “death” of his son quite hard.

Everyone mourns in his/her own way.

But, is there a right way and a wrong way to mourn?

“I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have

fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who have no hope” (1 Thess 4:13).

If we have hope, how would our grief be different?

Page 58: The Backside of Betrayal

I don’t want to get bogged down in a discussion about

how much the patriarchs knew of the afterlife.

This is before God reveals Himself as the God of the living

and the dead (Ex 3:6; Matt 22:32), yet the patriarchs “waited

for the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker

is God” (Heb 11:8-10).

I would imagine that the more the patriarchs knew of the

afterlife, the easier the grieving process.

Page 59: The Backside of Betrayal

This is the first time in Scripture that we have mention

of the afterlife.

“I shall go down into the grave to my son in mourning” (v 35,


“I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning” (ESV).

Every time “Sheol” is mentioned in Scripture the ESV

(with only one exception in the Song of Songs) leaves

the word untranslated.

The translators chose just to put the Hebrew “Sheol” in the

text; the term seems to have different meanings depending

on the context.

In many ways, that is preferable, because it allows the

reader to draw his/her own conclusions.

Page 60: The Backside of Betrayal

Sheol can mean:

Death (Prov 5:5);

The grave (1 Sam 2:6);

The realm of the departed (Job 7:9);

The state of being in extreme danger (2 Sam 22:6).

It appears that both the righteous and unrighteous go to


In this way, Sheol would be quite akin to Hades in the New


But, Sheol seems to have a much more broad meaning.

Page 61: The Backside of Betrayal