the global food price crisis and china-world rice market...

53
The Global Food Price Crisis and China-World Rice Market Integration: A Spatial-Temporal Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model Randall Xianglin Shu-Ling Mario J. Romero-Aguilar Liu Chen Miranda The Ohio State University The Ohio State University National Taipei University The Ohio State University 2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting Washington DC, August 4-6, 2013

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Global Food Price Crisis and China-World Rice

    Market Integration:A Spatial-Temporal Rational Expectations Equilibrium Model

    Randall Xianglin Shu-Ling Mario J.Romero-Aguilar Liu Chen MirandaThe Ohio State University The Ohio State University National Taipei University The Ohio State University

    2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual MeetingWashington DC, August 4-6, 2013

  • In a nutshell

    The question

    How would China affect theinternational rice market if itliberalized its trade in rice?

    China is the world’ largestproducer and consumer;

    Only about 5% of rice is tradedinternationally.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 1 / 11

  • In a nutshell

    The question

    How would China affect theinternational rice market if itliberalized its trade in rice?

    China is the world’ largestproducer and consumer;

    Only about 5% of rice is tradedinternationally.

    The answer

    It will substantially reduce andstabilize the world rice price:

    reducing risk faced by majorimporters;

    particularly price spikes caused byexport restrictions.

    The model

    Spatial-temporal rationalexpectations:

    four interdependent markets;

    storage by speculative storers andgovernment.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 1 / 11

  • Outline

    1 Introduction

    2 The Model

    3 Results

    4 Conclusions

  • Introduction

    The Problem

    Export Prices for Thai Rice2006-1013

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    Price US$/mt

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    US

    dolla

    rs p

    er m

    etri

    c to

    nne

    Data source: FAO: Thailand, 100% B, 2nd grade, White ricebroken, Bangkok, f.o.b.

    Rice is one of the world’s mainstaples.

    The poor spend around 40% oftheir income on staples.

    The sudden price increaseparticularly hurt the poor indeveloping countries.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 2 / 11

    http://www.fao.org/economic/est/prices

  • Outline

    1 Introduction

    2 The Model

    3 Results

    4 Conclusions

  • The Model Description

    The spatial dimension

    Exporters

    China

    World Market Importers

    * Brazil * Pakistan

    * Egypt * Thailand

    * India * Vietnam

    * Bangladesh * Philippines

    * Indonesia * United States

    * Malaysia

    * Cote d'Ivoire * Nigeria

    * Iran * Saudi Arabia

    * Iraq * Senegal

    * China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 3 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The spatial dimension

    Exporters

    China

    World Market Importers

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    p s

    d

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 3 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The spatial dimension

    Exporters

    China

    World Market Importers

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    p s

    d

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 3 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The spatial dimension

    Exporters

    China

    World Market Importers

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    p s

    d

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 3 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The spatial dimension

    Exporters

    China

    World Market Importers

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    ps

    d

    q

    p s

    d

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 3 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    Old

    Stock

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    Old

    Stock

    New

    Stock

    Export

    P����s

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    YieldAcres N

    ew

    Harvest

    Old

    Stock

    Consumption

    New

    Stock

    Export

    Prices

    Prices

    Expectation

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Description

    The temporal dimensions

    Past

    Present

    Future

    YieldAcres N

    ew

    Harvest

    Old

    Stock

    Consumption

    New

    Stock

    Export

    Prices

    Prices

    Expectation

    Acres

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 4 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Solving the model

    There are 31 variables in the model: 23 endogenous, 4 exogenous,and 4 predetermined.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 5 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Solving the model

    There are 31 variables in the model: 23 endogenous, 4 exogenous,and 4 predetermined.

    Two main challenges:

    Solving the mixed-complementarity conditions (Newton’s methodapplied to Fisher’s function, the semismooth rootfinding formulation)

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 5 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Solving the model

    There are 31 variables in the model: 23 endogenous, 4 exogenous,and 4 predetermined.

    Two main challenges:

    Solving the mixed-complementarity conditions (Newton’s methodapplied to Fisher’s function, the semismooth rootfinding formulation)Approximating the expected prices as a function of availabilities(projection methods, using tensor product of quadratic Chebyshevpolynomials)

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 5 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Solving the model

    There are 31 variables in the model: 23 endogenous, 4 exogenous,and 4 predetermined.

    Two main challenges:

    Solving the mixed-complementarity conditions (Newton’s methodapplied to Fisher’s function, the semismooth rootfinding formulation)Approximating the expected prices as a function of availabilities(projection methods, using tensor product of quadratic Chebyshevpolynomials)

    Parameter calibration

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 5 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Putting the model to work

    Once solved, model is simulated to compare alternative scenarios

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 6 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Putting the model to work

    Once solved, model is simulated to compare alternative scenarios

    Comparison based on stationary distribution of variables

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 6 / 11

  • The Model Solution

    Putting the model to work

    Once solved, model is simulated to compare alternative scenarios

    Comparison based on stationary distribution of variables

    Model allows to analyze the dynamic adjustment to new stationaryequilibrium, following a regime change

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 6 / 11

  • Outline

    1 Introduction

    2 The Model

    3 Results

    4 Conclusions

  • Results

    How much rice would be traded?

    Over time, China would export on average 6.25% of its rice production.

    China only

    3 6 9 12 15 180.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    China’s exports, percent of own production

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________6.25 3.31

    Baseline: NO exporter ban, YES importer stock.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 7 / 11

  • Results

    How much rice would be traded?

    That would increase the world volume of rice trade, while reducing its vari-ability.

    China only

    3 6 9 12 15 180.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    China’s exports, percent of own production

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________6.25 3.31

    World market

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    Rice traded, percent of world production

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________3.33 1.85

    4.94 0.75

    No ChinaWith China

    Baseline: NO exporter ban, YES importer stock.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 7 / 11

  • Results

    The effect of China’s integration on world rice priceNormal

    trad

    e

    No stockpile in importers

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.01 0.09

    No China

    Importers have stockpile

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________0.99 0.05

    No China

    Exp

    ortban

    s

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.67 0.20

    No China

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.70 0.20

    No China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 8 / 11

  • Results

    The effect of China’s integration on world rice priceNormal

    trad

    e

    No stockpile in importers

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.01 0.09

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Importers have stockpile

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________0.99 0.05

    No China

    Exp

    ortban

    s

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.67 0.20

    No China

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.70 0.20

    No China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 8 / 11

  • Results

    The effect of China’s integration on world rice priceNormal

    trad

    e

    No stockpile in importers

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.01 0.09

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Importers have stockpile

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________0.99 0.05

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Exp

    ortban

    s

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.67 0.20

    No China

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.70 0.20

    No China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 8 / 11

  • Results

    The effect of China’s integration on world rice priceNormal

    trad

    e

    No stockpile in importers

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.01 0.09

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Importers have stockpile

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________0.99 0.05

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Exp

    ortban

    s

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.67 0.20

    0.92 0.00

    No ChinaWith China

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.70 0.20

    No China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 8 / 11

  • Results

    The effect of China’s integration on world rice priceNormal

    trad

    e

    No stockpile in importers

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.01 0.09

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Importers have stockpile

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________0.99 0.05

    0.92 0.02

    No ChinaWith China

    Exp

    ortban

    s

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.67 0.20

    0.92 0.00

    No ChinaWith China

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    World Price

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________1.70 0.20

    0.92 0.00

    No ChinaWith China

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 8 / 11

  • Results

    Can importers stabilize domestic price?

    Without a buffer stock, local prices in importing countries increase in re-sponse to a ban on exports.

    Normal trade

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.01 0.09

    No buffer

    Export bans

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.67 0.20

    No buffer

    Baseline: China not integrated

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 9 / 11

  • Results

    Can importers stabilize domestic price?

    Having a stock provides minimal help during normal trade years...

    Normal trade

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.01 0.090.99 0.05

    No bufferWith buffer

    Export bans

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.67 0.20

    No buffer

    Baseline: China not integrated

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 9 / 11

  • Results

    Can importers stabilize domestic price?

    ...yet it is definitely ineffective in a trade disruption.

    Normal trade

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.01 0.090.99 0.05

    No bufferWith buffer

    Export bans

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    Domestic price, Importers

    Ker

    nel d

    ensi

    ty

    µ σ__________

    1.67 0.201.70 0.20

    No bufferWith buffer

    Baseline: China not integrated

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 9 / 11

  • Results

    The dynamics of adjustment after China’s integrationChina

    World

    Prices

    0 3 6 9 120.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    1.05

    time

    Pric

    e

    0 3 6 9 120.71

    0.72

    0.73

    0.74

    time

    Pric

    e

    new steady state response to shock 90% interval

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 10 / 11

  • Results

    The dynamics of adjustment after China’s integrationChina

    World

    Prices

    0 3 6 9 120.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    1.05

    time

    Pric

    e

    0 3 6 9 120.71

    0.72

    0.73

    0.74

    time

    Pric

    e

    Stockpiles

    0 3 6 9 120

    5

    10

    15

    timePe

    rcen

    t cap

    acity

    0 3 6 9 1220

    40

    60

    80

    100

    time

    Perc

    ent c

    apac

    ity

    new steady−state response to shock 90% interval

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 10 / 11

  • Results

    The dynamics of adjustment after China’s integrationChina

    World

    Prices

    0 3 6 9 120.85

    0.9

    0.95

    1

    1.05

    time

    Pric

    e

    0 3 6 9 120.71

    0.72

    0.73

    0.74

    time

    Pric

    e

    Stockpiles

    0 3 6 9 120

    5

    10

    15

    timePe

    rcen

    t cap

    acity

    0 3 6 9 1220

    40

    60

    80

    100

    time

    Perc

    ent c

    apac

    ity

    Acreage

    0 3 6 9 1294

    96

    98

    100

    time

    Perc

    ent l

    and

    avai

    labl

    e

    0 3 6 9 1276

    78

    80

    82

    84

    time

    Perc

    ent l

    and

    avai

    labl

    e

    new steady−state response to shock 90% interval

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 10 / 11

  • Outline

    1 Introduction

    2 The Model

    3 Results

    4 Conclusions

  • Conclusions

    Summary of results

    Bans on exports increase the expected price of rice and its volatility.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 11 / 11

  • Conclusions

    Summary of results

    Bans on exports increase the expected price of rice and its volatility.

    Storage by importer do not affect the world price nor their local price.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 11 / 11

  • Conclusions

    Summary of results

    Bans on exports increase the expected price of rice and its volatility.

    Storage by importer do not affect the world price nor their local price.

    In all scenarios, China’s integration to international rice marketreduces both the mean and variance of the world price.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 11 / 11

  • Conclusions

    Summary of results

    Bans on exports increase the expected price of rice and its volatility.

    Storage by importer do not affect the world price nor their local price.

    In all scenarios, China’s integration to international rice marketreduces both the mean and variance of the world price.

    Following China’s integration, price and acreage will increase inChina. Opposite result in world market.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 11 / 11

  • Conclusions

    Summary of results

    Bans on exports increase the expected price of rice and its volatility.

    Storage by importer do not affect the world price nor their local price.

    In all scenarios, China’s integration to international rice marketreduces both the mean and variance of the world price.

    Following China’s integration, price and acreage will increase inChina. Opposite result in world market.

    Prices would adjust fast, while acreage and China’s stockpile wouldadjust slowly.

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 11 / 11

  • Additional material

    Model equations:

    Consumption demand

    Prices: market clearing

    Storage conditions

    Production supply

    Trade: arbitrage

    Availabilities

    High price volatility:

    Export restrictions and price

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Consumption demand

    0 ≤ Cc ≤ ∞ & Cc = αcP−βcc

    0 ≤ Cx ≤ ∞ & Cx = αxP−βxx

    0 ≤ Cm≤ ∞ & Cm = αmP−βmm

    0 ≤ Cw≤ ∞ & Cw = αwP−βww

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 12

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Prices: Demand vs supply

    0 ≤ Pc ≤ ∞ ⊥ Cc +Zc − Ac +Yc

    0 ≤ Px ≤ ∞ ⊥ Cx +Zx − Ax + Yx

    0 ≤ Pm≤ ∞ ⊥ Cm +Zm − Am −Ym

    0 ≤ Pw≤ ∞ ⊥ Cw +Zw − Aw−Yc − Yx+Ym

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 13

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Storage

    0 ≤ Zc ≤ Z̄c ⊥ P̄c − Pc

    0 ≤ Zx ≤ Z̄x ⊥ P̄x − Px

    0 ≤ Zm≤ Z̄m ⊥ P̄m − Pm

    0 ≤ Zw≤ Z̄w ⊥ δ EPw − Pw − K

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 14

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Acreage and Production

    Production

    Qc = ǫ̃cqc,−1

    Qx = ǫ̃xqx ,−1

    Qm = ǫ̃mqm,−1

    Qw = ǫ̃wqw ,−1

    Acreage

    qc ≤ qc ≤ q̄c ⊥ φc(EPc)θc −qc

    qx ≤ qx ≤ q̄x ⊥ φx(EPx)θx −qx

    qm ≤ qm≤ q̄m ⊥ φm(EPm)θm−qm

    qw ≤ qw≤ q̄w ⊥ φw (EPw )θw −qw

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 15

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Trade

    0 ≤ Yc ≤ Ȳc ⊥ Pw −Pc − τc

    0 ≤ Yx ≤ Ȳx ⊥ Pw −Px − τx

    0 ≤ Ym≤ Ȳm ⊥ Pm−Pw − τm

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 16

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    Availability

    Ac = Qc + Zc,−1

    Ax = Qx + Zx ,−1

    Am = Qm + Zm,−1

    Aw = Qw + Zw ,−1

    Romero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 17

  • Appendix Model’s equations

    The effects of export restrictions on rice prices

    Jan: Egypt restrict exports, and China adds 10% tax on exports & rescinds VAT rebate

    Jan-Feb: Drought in Iran order 0.8 million mt of Thai rice

    Jan-Apr: Philippines buys normal annual quota injust 4 months, including govt-to-govt deal with Vietnam

    Mar: India, Vietnam, China & Cambodia impose tighter export restrictions & new Thai govt discusses possibility of ban

    Apr: Nigeria scraps 100% tariffs & imports 0.5 million mt Thai rice

    Sep-Oct 2007, Vietnam and India place partial restrictions on exports

    Sep: India lifts export ban on some higher quality varieties

    Q1: Saudi Arabia subsidizes rice imports; Saudi imports from Thailand rise by nearly 90% after India’s ban

    Strong demand from energyexporters keeps rice prices 25-30% above 2007 levels

    Jun: Cambodia removes ban

    Jun: Egypt announces re-export of rice from Sep.

    Jun: Record harvests, Japan allowed to re-export rice

    stocks, dollar strengthens, oil & other crop prices fall

    Source: Headey 2011 Rethinking the global food crisis: The role of trade shocksRomero-Aguilar,Liu,Chen,Miranda () The Global Food Price Crisis 2013 AAEA Meeting 18

    IntroductionThe ModelResultsConclusions