the ill: an international analytical large scale user facility...conventions between the associates...
TRANSCRIPT
Martin WALTER, 20 November 2018 I N S T I T U T M A X V O N L A U E - P A U L L A N G E V I N 1
The ILL: An international Analytical Large Scale User Facility
2
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
• Created 19 January 1967 through the signature of an intergovernmental convention
• International organisation – implemented as a French private company
• Single site-RI • Share site with ESRF, EMBL and IBS • User programme operational since 1972 • An annual budget of approximately 90 M€ • A workforce of about 500 people • Three Associates countries (owners) • Ten Scientific Member countries
• ESFRI Roadmap entry in 2006 with an
upgrade programme
THE CONTEXT
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
THE INGREDIENTS OF ILL’S SUCCESS
Running the
• world’s most intense continuous neutron source,
• feeding a continuously upgraded cutting-edge instrument suite
• for the user community.
• Allocation of instrument time is based on scientific excellence.
• Provision of an outstanding user support services.
Long term sustainability also assured through the
signature of 10 years intergovernmental
conventions between the Associates including the
commitment to finance the decommissioning of the
installation, plus commitment from the Scientific
Members for 5 years periods.
4
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
SCIENTIFIC IMPACT
Publications in high-impact scientific journals More than 22000 peer reviewed publications
5
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
KPIS ABOUT THE ILL’S USER PROGRAMME
850 experiments/year
650 publications/year
28 instruments + 10 CRG
65 countries
1400 users from an active community of 12 000 scientists
4 cycles of 50 days/year
6
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
ILL Committees: • Steering Committee STC (= Council) meets every 6 months
• Lays down the general directives for managing the Association. • Supervise the management and has the right to issue instructions to the Director
STC is advised by • Subcommittee on Administrative Questions – meets every 6 months
• Monitors the administrative operations of the Association and makes recommendations to the STC
• Scientific Council –meets every 6 months • Gives its opinion on all scientific and technical matters at the request of the
Steering Committee or the Directors, or at its own initiative • External experts review the scientific programme and carry out a periodic review
of the ILL instruments suite • Subcommittees of the Scientific council, composed of external experts, evaluate
the submitted proposal for beamtime allocation
INTERNAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES
7
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
• STC is advised by • Audit Commission –meets every 12 months
• Performs special internal audits – Compliance • Composed of auditors from the UK (national audit office), FR (cour de comptes)
DE (Bundesrechnungshof)
• Statutory Auditor • Annual accounts of the Association must be audited and certified by a statutory
auditor
• ILL is also evaluated on an ongoing basis by the French Nuclear Safety Authorities
INTERNAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES
8
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
INTERNAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES - KPIS
Every six months compliation of a detailed report for the ILL Council and its advisory bodies (~250 pages)
User- & Research-related Results
Reactor cycles
Number of public instruments
Number of CRG instruments
Instrument days used4)
Instrument days lost
Number of proposals submitted
Number of proposals accepted
Requests for instrument days
Instrument days allocated
Number of visits / visitors
Number of publications (total)
Number of publications with ILL staff Ph.D. theses (ILL intern)
Budget (k€) Income from Assoc. Grants (k€) Contributions from Sci. Members (k€) EU funding (k€) + ANR
Other 3rd
party funding (k€) Income from royalties (k€)
5)
Total income (incl. carry-forward, reserve) Investment ILL/total income
Investment DS/total income
Investment DPT/total income
Investment DRe/total income
Investment DA/total income
Millennium Programme
Expenditure (Capital + Recurrent) (k€) Personnel costs (k€) Endurance Expenditure (total) (k€) Reactor Fuel cycle (K€) Key Reactor Components (K€) Stress tests Fukushima
Personnel Resources
Number of staff (persons)1)
Number of staff (FTE)²)
Cadres
Post-Docs
Ph.D. students
Trainees
Percentage of Women
Cadres
Non-cadres
Permanent Positions/Fluctuations/Illness Ratio permanent/total positions
- for cadres
Departures (total)
- for cadres
Incoming (total)
- for cadres
Personnel Resources Days of illness
Days lost due to accidents
Duration of Employment/Age
Total staff
Cadres
National Origin of Staff (persons)
ILL Associates (total)
France
Germany
U.K.
ILL Scientific Members (total)
Others
Management Control Ratios and Indicators for last 5 years
9
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
INTERNAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES - KPIS
Long term financial planning (10 years) updated and presented every 6 months
Current – Prior – Difference to Prior budget planning
allow to follow the financial long term planning over time
10
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
Associates+SM
User representation
ILL representation
External bodies in France
Elected Staff Representation
The ecosystem Scientific
Council
Instrum.
Sub
Committee Users
User
Forum
Comité
D’entreprise
CHSCT Délégués du
Personnel
Commission
Paritaire
Science and
colleges
committee Commission
Interne de
Sécurité
Associates
Audit
Commission Steering
Committee SAQ
Scientific
Members
ESS
EIRO
Forum
Head of
Neutron
Centres
ENSA
European
Commission
Tax payers ASN IRSN Mairie
Préfecture
Inspect.
du
Travail CNIL
State
security
Ministries
FR
DE
UK
Ministries
AT, BE, CZ
CH,ES, DK,
IT, SE, SK,
PL
11
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
USEFUL LESSONS – THE ECONOMIC MODEL
6 levers, 8 ILL performance indicators and 4 risks have been identified
Impact on ILL budget
Income
Expenditure
Decision of the Asssociates or
Scientific Members regarding ILL budget
(increase or decrease in the
budget)
Risks
Loss of competencies Social disruption / ILL activity disruption
Loss of motivation Declining attractiveness
Impact on ILL performance
Efficiency
Number of publications
Days offered to users
Instrument reliability
Overbooking
Training
Technology transfer
Number of High impact publications Investment programmes
Number of cycles
Number of instruments*
Level of maintenance
Levers (that can be combined)
Organization
ILL’s Own Income
Human Resources KPIs should take
into consideration
the level of funding
provided to the RI
Indicators Definition
Initial weighting
Final weighting
1a Number of high-impact publications
Number of publications with a high impact factor, that is, the average number of citations to recent articles published in science journals . (Implies having top quality scientists at ILL.)
32% 25%
1b Number of publications Total number of publications 32% 20%
2 Number of available days Available days = days used for users + days for commissioning/test/training + days for internal research + days lost
6% 15%
3 Instrument efficiency (average number of days per experiment)
1-(Nb of days used for users / Nb of experiments) 6% 15%
4 Instruments reliability 1-(Nb of days lost / Nb of available experiment days) 6% 15%
5 Booking Factor Number of requested beamdays / Nb of accepted beamdays 6% 0%
6 Number of thesis based on the use of ILL
Not only thesis financed by ILL but also all the thesis based on the use of ILL data
6% 10%
7 Technology transfer Turnover generated 6% 0%
12
T H E E U R O P E A N N E U T R O N S O U R C E
• Complementarity to already existing internal evaluations in RIs
• Clear definition of the target audience of the proposed KPIs
• Including assessment of the overarching European/International political
framework conditions going beyond KPIs of the RIs
• Reuse of existing documentation
EXPECTATIONS FROM ESFRI MONITORING/PERIODIC UPDATE
13
I N S T I T U T L A U E L A N G E V I N
22/11/2018