the index of refraction of solid hydrogen lieutenant colonel brian tom*, usaf siddhartha bhasker*...
TRANSCRIPT
The Index of Refraction of The Index of Refraction of Solid HydrogenSolid Hydrogen
Lieutenant Colonel Brian Tom*, USAFLieutenant Colonel Brian Tom*, USAFSiddhartha Bhasker*Siddhartha Bhasker*
Yuki MiyamotoYuki Miyamoto‡‡
Dr. Takamasa MomoseDr. Takamasa Momose‡‡ Dr. Benjamin McCall*Dr. Benjamin McCall*††
*Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign*Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
††Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDepartment of Astronomy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
‡‡Department of Chemistry, The University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Chemistry, The University of British Columbia
OverviewOverview
• Solid hydrogen backgroundSolid hydrogen background
• Why measure the index of refraction?Why measure the index of refraction?
• ExperimentExperiment
• ResultsResults
• ConclusionsConclusions
Solid Hydrogen BackgroundSolid Hydrogen Background
• Study of solid hydrogen is >70 years oldStudy of solid hydrogen is >70 years old– Quantum effectsQuantum effects– Spin echo/relaxation NMR propertiesSpin echo/relaxation NMR properties– Raman scattering Raman scattering
• Areas open for studyAreas open for study– Mechanical propertiesMechanical properties– Index of refractionIndex of refraction
Van Kranendonk, Solid Hydrogen, Plenum Press, 1983. Souers, Hydrogen Properties for Fusion Energy, U of Cal. Press, 75,1986.
H2
Why measure the index?Why measure the index?
• Stokes Raman shift in HStokes Raman shift in H22
– Obtain wavelengths for Obtain wavelengths for spectroscopyspectroscopy
• Can use multipass cell Can use multipass cell with Hwith H22 gas gas
– Requires high Requires high reflectivity/high damage reflectivity/high damage threshold mirrorsthreshold mirrors ω= 683 nm 953 nm 1576 nm
ν=1
ν=0
ωPump=532nm
Brasseur et al., Optics Ltrs., 23, 367, 1998. Brasseur et al., JOSA Comm., 1999. McCall et al., App. Phys. Ltrs., 82, 2003. McCall, OSU Conference Talk, 2003.
Why measure the index?Why measure the index?
• Condensed phases are Condensed phases are more efficient for more efficient for
Raman shiftRaman shift– 7000 x gain7000 x gain– Higher number densityHigher number density– Smaller line widthSmaller line width
• Consistent with Consistent with observations of observations of Katsuragawa Katsuragawa et alet al. .
PhasePhase NumberNumber
DensityDensity
(cm(cm-3-3),n),n
LinewidthLinewidth GainGain
Gaseous Gaseous HH22
3.1E213.1E21 28.4GHz28.4GHz
LiquidLiquid
HH22
2.1E222.1E22 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
SolidSolid
HH22
2.6E222.6E22 <7 MHz<7 MHz
Souers, Hydrogen Properties for Fusion Energy, U of Cal. Press, 1986. Uetake et al., Phys. Rev. A., 61, 1999. Katsuragawa et al., Optics Letters, 25 177, 2000. McCall et al., App. Phys. Ltrs., 82, 2003.
n
Why Measure the Index?Why Measure the Index?
• Continuous wave, Stokes down-converted Continuous wave, Stokes down-converted light using solid Hlight using solid H22
Experiment:Experiment:The art of making solid hydrogenThe art of making solid hydrogen
• >99.9% pure parahydrogen used in both >99.9% pure parahydrogen used in both Kyoto and Champaign-UrbanaKyoto and Champaign-Urbana
• Two methods of crystal growthTwo methods of crystal growth– Vapor DepositionVapor Deposition– Crystallization Crystallization
from liquidfrom liquid
Souers, P.,Hydrogen Properties for Fusion Energy, U of Cal., 1986.
Experiment: KyotoExperiment: Kyoto
• 434.8 to 1111.1 nm434.8 to 1111.1 nm• Measured differenceMeasured difference
between vacuumbetween vacuum
and solid Hand solid H22
– MeasurementMeasurement
taken attaken at
10 meters10 meters
Experiment: Champaign-UrbanaExperiment: Champaign-Urbana
Experiment: Champaign-UrbanaExperiment: Champaign-Urbana
Experiment: Champaign-UrbanaExperiment: Champaign-Urbana
= Vacuum in cell
= Hydrogen in cell
Experiment: Champaign-UrbanaExperiment: Champaign-Urbana
v UU U
A v
n nA Tan ArcSin Sin ArcSin Sin
n n
v UU U
s v
n nG Tan ArcSin Sin ArcSin Sin
n n
uU U
s UU U
vUU
s
nS Sin ArcSin Sin
n nV Tan ArcSin Sin
nnCos ArcSin Sin
n
D
Wavelength (nm)Wavelength (nm) Index* Index* ++0.0010.001
(Kyoto)(Kyoto)
IndexIndex† † ++0.0010.001
(C-U)(C-U)
2000-50002000-5000 DFGDFG
1111.11111.1 1.1321.132
1000.01000.0 1.1331.133 DiodeDiode
909.1909.1 1.1331.133 DiodeDiode
833.3833.3 1.1331.133
769.2769.2 1.1331.133
714.3714.3 1.1331.133
666.7666.7 1.1321.132
632.8632.8 1.1373-1.13951.1373-1.1395
625.0625.0 1.1321.132
588.2588.2 1.1331.133
555.6555.6 1.1341.134
526.3526.3 1.1351.135
500.0500.0 1.1351.135 Argon IonArgon Ion
476.2476.2 1.1361.136 Argon IonArgon Ion
454.5454.5 1.1361.136
434.8434.8 1.1361.136
PreliminaryResults
*6 K† 7.724-8.049 K
= C-U Target
Wavelengths
Preliminary ResultsPreliminary Results
8.045 K
7.724 K
=C-U data
ConclusionsConclusions
• Solid hydrogen is an efficient tool for Solid hydrogen is an efficient tool for generating light for spectroscopy generating light for spectroscopy
• More measurements to comeMore measurements to come
• CW, Stokes-shiftedCW, Stokes-shifted
light via solid Hlight via solid H22
is on the horizonis on the horizon
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• United States Air ForceUnited States Air Force
• National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation
• The Packard FoundationThe Packard Foundation
• Prof. Takeshi Oka, University of ChicagoProf. Takeshi Oka, University of Chicago