the navy’s environmental restoration program in the … county... · navfac southwest . derral...

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

Derral Van Winkle, PG Environmental Remediation PLC NAVFAC Southwest

The Navy’s Environmental Restoration Program in the Southwest

Society of American Military Engineers

Orange County Post

March 2014

2 NAVFAC Southwest

Presentation Focus Areas

•Overview of NAVFAC SW Environmental Program •EV Restoration Statistics

–Financials –Metrics

•EV Restoration Challenges •EV Restoration Initiatives •EV Restoration Procurement

3/27/2014

3 NAVFAC Southwest 3/27/2014

Environmental Areas of Responsibility

Environmental Quality Programs: –Environmental Compliance & Services –Environmental Planning –Environmental Assessments & Special Programs –Natural and Cultural Resources including Marine Biology

Environmental Restoration Program –Chemical and Munitions Cleanup

Sustainable Solid Waste Management (SW only) Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)

4 NAVFAC Southwest

SW FY13-14 Project Execution Overview

Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change

BRAC $116

ERN $47

EQ $93

EC $53 CR

$13

NR $19

NEPA $8

FY13 Project Execution $256M

EQ Detail

3/27/2014

FY14 Project Execution $227M

NAVFAC LANT FY13 Execution

BRAC $75

ERN $62

EQ $90

- 100,000,000 200,000,000 300,000,000

MW

ML

SE

SW

WASH

LANT Core

ER,NBRACEQ

5 NAVFAC Southwest

SW Environmental Funding Profiles

3/27/2014

0

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

57 47

55 51 41

19 15

5 7

7 7 22

26 35

IRP MRP

IRP vs MRP

131

181

130

73

209

148

235

200 177

107

142 116

75 73 95

0

50

100

150

200

250

BRAC ($M)

65 64 76

89

71 59

64 61

47

62 54

62 58 63

45 50

82

0102030405060708090

100

ERN ($M)

6 NAVFAC Southwest

NAVFAC Southwest ER,N Requirements Overall Cost to Complete (CTC): $766M

54% Installation Restoration Program -- 46% Munitions Response Program

IRP $411

MRP $355

ER,N Total CTC

Navy $252

MC $160

Installation Restoration CTC

Navy $306

MC, $49

Munitions Response CTC

61% Navy -- 39% MC 86% Navy -- 14% MC 3/27/2014

7 NAVFAC Southwest

Southwest ER,N Program Execution Plan – IRP vs. MRP ($M); Comparison 2012 - 2014

-5

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

IRP 2012 Plan

IRP 2013 Plan

IRP 2014 Plan

MRP 2012 Plan

MRP 2013 Plan

MRP 2014 Plan


Cost-to-Complete by Navy/Marine Corps Installation

$0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000SAN DIEGO CA MCRD

SAN DIEGO CA FLT&INDSUPCTLOS ANGELES CA NMCRC

SPAWARSYSCEN PACIFIC SDSAN DIEGO CA NISE-WEST

NAVBASE POINT LOMAAZUSA CA NCCOSC MORRIS DA

SAN DIEGO CA NTCSAN DIEGO CA AUXLNDFLD

CORONADO CA NAVPHIBASEDIXON CA NAVRADFAC-T

IMPERIAL BEACH CA NAVALFSAN PEDRO DFSC

PORT HUENEME CA NFELCBRIDGEPORT CA MWTC

LEMOORE CA NASNAS PT MUGU CA NAVAIRWARCFALLBROOK CA NWS SBCH DET

TWENTYNINE PALMS CA MAGCCYUMA AZ MCASFALLON NV NAS

EL CENTRO CA NAFCHINA LAKE CA NAWCWPNSDIV

SEAL BEACH CA WPNSUPFACMIRAMAR CA MCASBARSTOW CA MCLB

NAVBASE CORONADOCAMP PENDLETON CA MCB

NAVBASE SAN DIEGO

IRP MRP

Top 5 ER.N Budgets 1. NBSD (UXO 100 $250M) 2. Camp Pendleton 3. NAVBASE Coronado 4. Barstow 5. Miramar


CERCLA Process – Phases and Milestones


Phase Status of Southwest Sites

Phase Southwest

Site Closure + Response Complete no additional remediation; (ex of sites RC but not SC - landfills/UXO)

81%

Remedy-in-Place and sustained operation achieved while Remedial Action Objective yet to be met

3%

Active sites are those in the investigation/study phase including decision document and remedial design.

16%

57% 24%

3% 16% SCRCRIP/RAOActive

24 CC Sites1023 IRP Sites64 MRP Sites

Total # of ERN Southwest Sites = 1111


Office Secretary of Defense Planning Guidance Goals

Total SW Sites Sites Remaining

to reach RC

EOY FY 18 % Projection

FY to reach 90%

EOY FY 21 % Projection

FY to reach 95%

Sites

Remaining after EOY FY 21

1111 277 95% 2016 98% 2021 18

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1986 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2024 2037

DPG Goals: • 90% Sites

RC by FY18 (yellow line)

• 95% Sites RC by FY21(red line)

RC metric tied to RC document with Agency concurrence

12

Projected Number of IRP Sites Achieving RC by Year – Comparison from 2012-2014

39

95

37 31 29

14 7

3

14 20

114

45 37

25

14 6 5

22

42

84

46

34

22 15

6 5 11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

IRP June 2012 IRP June 2013 IRP Jan 2014

Highlights: - Sequestration and furloughs in FY13 have

impacted our schedules; these numbers were adjusted in FY14

- Increased focus on RC documentation from the regulatory agencies meet the RC metric

13

Projected Number of MRP Sites Achieving RC by Year – Comparison from 2012-2014

0 0

3 3

8

11

13

4

2

0

1

3 3

5

6

12

8

7

0

1

3

1

5

8 8

7

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

MRP June 2012 MRP June 2013 MRP Jan 2014

Highlights: -MRP funding continues to be pushed out which affects sites reaching RC -Technology limitations - Navy working internally on risk assessment tools


Challenge Areas – Environmental Restoration

•Long Operation and Maintenance and Long Term Monitoring Tails

–Enhanced Optimization Review

•Munitions Program –Cleanup Costs –Underwater Evaluations –Risk Assessment

•Emergent Contaminants –1,4-Dioxane –Vapor Intrusion – TCE –Perflourinated Compounds (PFC’s) –Asbestos –Lead

•Sediment Cleanup •Future Radiation Evaluation/Cleanup

–BRAC = Now –ER,N = Future

15

Terrestrial: Remedial Investigation focus over next several years

•Support technology transfer of new advanced sensors and algorithms into mainstream use (Advanced Classification)

Munitions Response CTC Focus

Photos courtesy of ESTCP.

Underwater: Expanded Wide Area Assessment and Enhanced Resolution Sensors

Geometrics Metal Mapper

16 NAVFAC Southwest

Initiatives within NAVFAC Restoration Program

•5 Year Review Toolkit –Similar to Record of Decision Toolkit

•Standard ARARs Toolkit –Nationwide tool patterned after NAVFAC Southwest efforts

•Significant NIRIS Enhancement –Version 2.0 fully functional –New tools being added regularly

•Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Tool –CSM and Alternatives Analysis

3/27/2014

17 NAVFAC Southwest

Initiatives – Revised and Enhanced NAVFAC Installation Restoration Information Solution Tool

3/27/2014

18 NAVFAC Southwest

Initiatives – New Tools for Teams – Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Tool

3/27/2014

19 NAVFAC Southwest

PROGRAM FY13

Execution

FY14 Planned

Execution

FY14 Contract

Capacities

FY14 Planned

Solicitations Restoration/ BRAC $163M $152M $1,090M $100M Compliance/ ORC $53M $51M $149M $150M NEPA/NCR $40M $39M $55M $125M TOTALS $256M $242M $1,294M $375M

SW Environmental Contract Capacities

3/27/2014

20 NAVFAC Southwest

NAVFAC SW Restoration Procurements - Currently Underway ** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change

Contract Type Scope Location of Work

Contract Capacity/ Duration

Type RFP Date

Projected Award

Environmental Restoration RAC Single Award IDIQ; Cost-Plus Award Fee

Restoration SW AOR $100M/ 5 yrs

Small Business

June 2011 4th Qtr FY14

8(a) CERCLA/RCRA Single Award IDIQ; Fixed Price


Small Business

March 2013

3rd Qtr FY14

Environmental Compliance

A-E Compliance Single Award IDIQ; Fixed Price

Storm Water- incidental potable water, wastewater, GW, water quality

NAVFAC Wide

$30M/ 5 yrs

Small Business

June 2011 3rd Qtr FY14


** Data contained herein is based on the best available information and is subject to change NAVFAC SW Restoration Planned Procurements

Contract Type Scope Location

of Work Contract Capacity/ Duration

Type RFP Date

Projected Award

Environmental Compliance / Restoration Operational Range Sustainment EMAC

Compliance SW AOR $100M/ 5 yrs

Small Business

2nd QTR FY14

4th Qtr FY14

Restoration 8(a) EMAC


Small Business

3rd Qtr FY14

3rd Qtr FY15

Restoration SB EMAC


Small Business

3rd Qtr FY14

3rd Qtr FY15

22 NAVFAC Southwest

• Listing of expected NAVFAC Environmental Contract Opportunities • NAVFAC Webpage: www.navfac.navy.mil

• Small Business Program Office Webpage: https://smallbusiness.navfac.navy.mil

• Federal Business Opportunities: www.fedbizops.gov

3/27/2014

More Information

http://www.fedbizops.gov/


Questions?


Supporting Slides

25 NAVFAC Southwest

Growth in the Southwest

3/27/2014

•Plant Replacement Value –$31.6B

•Land Acreage –1,421,277

•Ships and Aircraft –58 Surface Ships –6 Submarines –2 Aircraft Carriers –556 Aircraft

•Commands –480 Tenant Commands –1 Hospital –1 Research Graduate School

Estimates for 2017 –Ships and Aircraft

• 68 Surface Ships • 6 Submarines • 3 Aircraft Carriers • 584 Aircraft

–Commands • 634 Tenant Commands • 1 Hospital • 1 Research Graduate School

020406080

100120

Load

ing

57% Increase in Projected Vessel Loading by 2021

26

Installation Restoration CTC Focus Optimization / Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR)

- Optimization efforts leading to more effective and efficient remediation solutions - Achieved cost avoidance of $177M over last 7 years

• Expanded optimization program to include Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) • New HQ initiative to review O&M and Long

Term Monitoring that extend many years (30+)

ROI of 5.0 (Actual Cost) or 9.9 (Potential Cost)

Optimization Study Cost

Optimization Remedy

Implement Cost

Actual Cost Avoidance

Potential Cost Avoidance

$ 16,532,813 (599 sites –

NAVFAC-Wide) $ 18,964,422 $ 177,602,506 $ 352,775,248


9

27

134,250

537,000

Mea

sure

d D

ata/

Thre

shol

d

Concentration (ug/m3)

Comparison of Regulatory Thresholds for TCE

OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (ug/m3)- 8 Hour TWA

NIOSH Relative Exposure Limit (ug/m3) -10 Hour TWA

03 Dec 13, EPA Region 9 ImmediateResponse Threshold (ug/m3)

03 Dec 13, EPA Region 9 PromptResponse Threshold (ug/m3)

~20,000 X less than OSHA PEL ~5,000 X less than NIOSH REL

~75,000 X less than OSHA PEL ~19,000 X less than NIOSH REL

Challenge Areas – Vapor Intrusion/Changing Regulatory Risk Factors

28

Advanced Munitions Classification

Courtesy: CECOS Advanced Munitions Site Management, 2012

29

• NAVFAC partnering with Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City to leverage Fleet MCM resources for Munitions Response Program

• Laser Scalar Gradiometer (LSG) • Small Synthetic Aperture Minehunter (SSAM)

• NAVFAC able to perform cost effective wide-area surveys to support characterization of MR sites

• Utilize currently fielded sensors • Use of “in-house” Navy resources • Added value for expanded mission on ONR

sensor/vehicle investment • Comparable capabilities unavailable from private

sector

EOD using REMUS 600

REMUS 600 Laser Scalar Gradiometer / Small Synthetic Aperture Minehunter

Leveraging Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs) for UXO

30

Same contact, different systems

Comparison between SSAM and best available commercial equipment.

Bomb Sunken canoe Rockets (warhead into sediment)

Leveraging Mine Countermeasures (MCM) Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs) for UXO

the navy’s environmental restoration program in the … county... · navfac southwest . derral...

Documents