the surrey local economic assessment technical annex ... · the surrey local economic assessment...

The Surrey Local Economic Assessment December 2010

of 41

The Surrey Local Economic Assessment

TECHNICAL ANNEX

December 2010

Commissioned by: Surrey County Council County Hall Penrhyn Road Kingston-upon-Thames KT1 2DN Contact: Damian Testa t: 020 8541 7068 e: [email protected]

Produced by: Surrey Economic Partnership Ltd Surrey Technology Centre Surrey Research Park Guildford GU2 7YG Contact: Mark Pearson t: 01483 685230 e: [email protected]


Page 1 of 41

Introduction This Technical Annex supports the main report of The Surrey Local Economic Assessment, 2010. Table of Annex References LEA Page LEA Report Section / Annex Title Reference

Annex Page

1. INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 11 1a. Engagement and Consultation: List of Organisations Consulted for the Surrey Local Economic Assessment, 2010 4 17 1b. Surrey Constraints Plan, 2010 6 2. ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 21 2a. GVA per head: Surrey’s Boroughs and Districts, 2009 7 21 2b. GVA Per Head Annual Growth Rates (adjusted): Surrey and the South East, 1997-2006 8 21 2c. GVA by Industry Sector, 1997-2007 8 22 2d. Personal Income Tax (£ million) by County, 2007-2008 9 22 2e. Gross Disposable Household Income per Head, 1997 and 2007 9 22 2f. Gross Disposable Household Income Per Head, 1997-2007 10 23 2g. UK Competitiveness Index (2010): Technical Note 11 24 2h. Top 25 Localities on the UK Competitiveness Index 1997 (UK=100) 12 24 2i. Additional Competitiveness Indices Produced by the Centre for International Competitiveness 13 26 2j. International Case Studies: Val d’Oise, France and Lüneburg, Germany 14 32 2k. Knowledge-based Businesses (Analysis of the UK Competitiveness Index, 2010) 16 3. BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE 34/36 3a. Business Size, 2008 17 37 3b. Home-based Businesses, 2008 18 40 3c.SEEDA Priority Sectors: Financial and Professional services 19 SEEDA Priority Sectors: ICT, Software and Digital Media 20 SEEDA Priority Sectors: Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences and Healthcare 21


Page 2 of 41

SEEDA Priority Sectors: Advanced Engineering and Marine 22 SEEDA Priority Sectors: Environment and Energy 23 SEEDA Priority Sectors: Aerospace and Defence 24 40 3d. Business Survival Rates by Year of Birth, 2003 25 4. LABOUR MARKET 46 4a. Economic Activity by District and Borough 26 49 4b. Resident Employment by Occupation, April 2009 - March 2010 27 53 4c. Surrey Commuting Patterns by District, 2001 28 56 4d. Out of Work Benefit Claimants, Totals and Rates (as a Proportion of the Resident Population of Surrey 16-64), Feb 2010 29 57 4e. JSA Claimants as a Percentage of the Working Age Population, February 2006 - August 2010 30 5. TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE 62 5a. Destination of Surrey Residents by Mode of Travel, 2001 31 62 5b. Origin of Surrey’s Workforce by Mode of Travel, 2001 32 67 5c. Affordability of Purchased Homes: Ratio of Price to Earnings (2000-2009) 33 67 5d. Surrey Districts: Affordability of purchased homes; Ratio of Price to Earnings (2000-2009) 33 6. SURREY’S PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES 72 6a. Mid-year Population Estimates, 2008 (Surrey and LEA Comparators) 34 73 6b. Population Density, 2007 35 77 6c. Components of Population Change Derived from the Mid-year Estimates, 2001-2007 36 77 6d. Average Annual Net Migration into Surrey from the UK, 2002-2007 37 77 6e. International Migration Inflow Rate, 2008 38 77 6f. International Migration Outflow Rate, 2008 39 77 6g. Migration Trends, 2002-2007 40 79 6h. Health Summary for Surrey, 2009 41


of 41

1: INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 1a: Engagement and Consultation: List of Organisations Consulted for the Surrey Local Economic Assessment, 2010 96.4 Eagle Radio Ace Resource Adult Learning Transition Group Apple Support and Training Baker Tilly BAM Nuttall Beer and Young Ltd Beronworth Standby Systems Limited Bickel Consulting BLS (Surrey) Ltd The Blue Ballroom Blue Mouse Studio Ltd Brandopia British Telecom Brooklands College Business Link South East Business Navigators (Europe) Ltd Canon (UK) Ltd Churchhouse Financial Planning Confederation of British Industry Connect 2 Innovation Connexions csi10 Ltd Diocese of Guildford East Surrey College Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Business Network Elmbridge Local Strategic Partnership Employability

Environment Agency Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Epsom & Ewell Local Strategic Partnership Fay Young Limited Gatwick Diamond Initiative GROW Group Gatwick Diamond Innovation and Growth Team Gavin Jones Landscape Going4Growth Limited Government Office for the South East (GOSE) Guildford Borough Council Guildford Local Strategic Partnership Hampshire County Council Hart Brown Solicitors House Tutor Integra Marketing Institute of Directors in West Surrey Jobcentre Plus Kingston University Kuju Entertainment Laytons Solicitors Lloyds Bank Plc LTSS Ltd Mansell Construction Services McLaren Applied Technologies Menzies Mole Valley District Council Mole Valley Local Strategic Partnership

National Skills Academy Financial Services Openia Limited Penningtons People Impact Organisation Development Plus Point Management Ltd Preseli Partnerships Ltd Prospects Services Prowse & Company Limited PricewaterhouseCoopers Random Greenway Architects Reigate and Banstead Borough Council Reigate and Banstead Local Strategic Partnership Ridgeway Money Royal Holloway University of London RS Business Modelling Ltd Runnymede Borough Council Runnymede Local Strategic Partnership Savvy and Victor Shirley Jones and Associates Silverbear Skills Funding Agency Sony UK Ltd South East Economic Partnerships (SEEP) South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) The South East Intelligence Network South East Office for National Statistics Spelthorne Borough Council


Page 4 of 41

Spelthorne Citizens Advice Bureau Spelthorne Local Strategic Partnership SpringHill Management Ltd Squiggle Ltd SQW Consulting Stingray Geophysical Surrey Action for Carers Surrey and West Sussex Federation of Small Businesses Surrey Biodiversity Partnership Surrey Care Association Surrey Chambers of Commerce Surrey Climate Change Partnership Surrey Community Action Surrey County Association of Parish and Town Councils (SCAPTC) Surrey County Council

Surrey Economic Development Officers Group Surrey Economic Partnership Surrey Heath Borough Council Surrey Heath Local Strategic Partnership Surrey Hills AONB Surrey Life Long Learning Partnership Surrey PCT Surrey Planning Officers Association and its Planning Working Group Surrey Research Park Surrey Rural Partnership Surrey SATRO Surrey Strategic Partnership Economic Development Delivery Board Surrey Supported Employment Surrey Youth Focus Tandridge District Council

Tandridge Local Strategic Partnership Think-Profit Ltd Tourism South East Transport for Surrey University for the Creative Arts University of Surrey Verologik LLP Vision Engineering Ltd Visit Surrey Partnership Watson Associates Waverley Borough Council Waverley Local Strategic Partnership West Surrey and North East Hants Innovation and Growth Team West Sussex Economic Partnership Woking Borough Council Woking Local Strategic Partnership The WOW! Gallery


Page 5 of 41

1b: Surrey Constraints Plan, 2010

Source: Surrey Draft Local Investment Plan, 2010 (Surrey LIP Working Group)


Page 6 of 41

2: ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 2a: GVA per head: Surrey’s Boroughs and Districts, 2009 District GVA per capita 2007 Elmbridge £20,918 Epsom & Ewell £19,008 Guildford £27,849 Mole Valley £26,357 Reigate and Banstead £24,235 Runnymede £30,076 Spelthorne £21,457 Surrey Heath £25,598 Tandridge £22,362 Waverley £22,179 Woking £26,128

Source: ONS Statistical Bulletin: Regional, Sub-regional and Local Gross Value Added 2009


Page 7 of 41

2b: GVA Per Head Annual Growth Rates (adjusted): Surrey and the South East, 1997-2006

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

annu

al p

erce

ntag

e ch

ange

Surrey South East

Source: ONS, 2008 (referenced in: Profile of Surrey, SEEDA draft, July 2009, unpublished) 2c: GVA by Industry Sector, 1997-2007 GVA £ million Sector 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Agriculture, forestry & fishing 143 134 149 139 128 127 130 138 101 110 126 Production 2,318 2,447 2,448 2,275 2,240 2,139 1,960 1,836 1,854 1,903 2,144 Construction 719 866 834 841 974 1,114 1,210 1,434 1,466 1,528 1,753 Distribution, transport & communication

3,678 4,022 4,585 4,905 4,504 4,591 4,702 4,568 4,718 5,070 5,383

Business services and finance 5,555 6,388 7,192 8,652 8,833 8,957 10,208 10,379 10,694 11,265 12,130 Public admin, education, health and other services

2,634 2,831 3,151 3,274 3,393 3,576 3,914 4,102 4,457 4,905 5,456

Total GVA 15,048 16,688 18,359 20,086 20,071 20,503 22,124 22,458 23,290 24,781 26,992 Source: ONS GVA data tables, 2009.


Page 8 of 41

2d: Personal Income Tax (£ million) by County, 2007-2008 Region and County Amount South East £28,900 Surrey £6,120 Berkshire Not available Buckinghamshire £2,380 Oxfordshire £2,310 Cambridgeshire £1,810

Source: Survey of Personal Incomes (HMRC data tables) 2e: Gross Disposable Household Income per Head, 1997 and 2007

Source: ONS (data release 1995 – 2008)


Page 9 of 41

2f: Gross Disposable Household Income Per Head, 1997-2007 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 % increase

1997 - 2007 England £9,999 £10,437 £10,842 £11,387 £12,078 £12,436 £12,999 £13,291 £13,783 £14,175 £14,523 45% South East £11,304 £11,853 £12,242 £12,864 £13,717 £14,144 £14,563 £14,728 £15,288 £15,821 £16,161 43% Surrey £13,925 £14,856 £15,635 £15,967 £16,963 £17,541 £17,909 £18,057 £19,072 £19,965 £20,169 45% Berkshire £12,005 £12,590 £12,832 £13,822 £14,257 £14,686 £15,335 £15,343 £15,938 £16,395 £17,027 42% Bucks £13,149 £13,762 £14,227 £15,077 £16,262 £16,565 £17,073 £17,331 £17,958 £19,008 £19,424 48% Cambs £10,613 £11,002 £11,786 £12,374 £12,788 £13,411 £13,891 £14,264 £15,208 £15,507 £15,590 47% Oxfordshire £11,818 £12,353 £12,528 £13,357 £14,093 £14,586 £14,844 £15,047 £15,515 £16,486 £16,281 38%

Source: ONS (data release 1995-2008)


Page 10 of 41

2g: UK Competitiveness Index (2010): Technical Note Produced by the Centre for International Competitiveness, the aim of the UK Competitiveness Index (UKCI) 2010 is to assess the relative economic competitiveness of regions and localities in the UK by constructing a single index that reflects, as fully as possible, the measurable criteria constituting place competitiveness. The index is based on three key components: inputs, outputs and resulting outcomes. Inputs are extremely important and together can be used as an indicator of competitiveness sustainability of a locality. Outputs are an indicator of an area’s ability to effectively utilise its competiveness ‘inputs’ and are therefore a measure of its productive capabilities. Outcome factors are used as a measure of ‘standard of living’. Inputs:

• economic activity rates • business start-up rates per 1,000 population • number of businesses per 1,000 inhabitants • proportion of working age population with NVQ level 4 or higher • proportion of knowledge-based business.

Outputs:

• gross value added (GVA)1 per head at current basic prices • productivity – Output per hour worked • employment rates.

Outcomes:

• gross weekly pay • unemployment rates.

1 District and Borough GVA estimates are produced by assuming the productivity within the corresponding NUTS 3 area (i.e. county) is the same as for the smaller local areas. Output per head = (NUTS 3 productivity x District Employment) ÷ District Population.


Page 11 of 41

2h: Top 25 Localities on the UK Competitiveness Index 1997 (UK=100)

Source: UK Competitiveness Index, 2010


Page 12 of 41

2i: Additional Competitiveness Indices Produced by the Centre for International Competitiveness The UK Competitiveness Index (UKCI) ranks the 12 UK regions (latest data from 2010). The key findings of note are that:

• The South East has, for the first time, moved into first place in the ranking (gaining one place since 2008) and pushed London into second place.

• The East of England has risen through the ranks and actually scores higher than all other regions on 'input' measures (i.e. economic activity rates; business start-up rates per 1,000 inhabitants; number of businesses per 1,000 inhabitants; proportion of working age population with NVQ level 4 or higher; and proportion of knowledge-based businesses).

• While the South East is now outperforming London, there is no room for complacency. The East of England is clearly gaining ground and, as the second and third set of competitiveness indices show, the South East’s relative position internationally continues to slip.

The European Competitiveness Index ranks 118 regions (latest data from 2006/ 07) and finds the following:

• Brussels in Belgium tops the list of most competitive regions in Europe. • London ranked 9th place (dropping one place since 2004). • South East ranked 16th (dropping four places since 2004).

The World Knowledge Competitiveness Index ranks 145 regions against 19 knowledge economy benchmarks (latest data from 2008) and finds:

• The top 10 regions in the world are all either in the US (first place being held by San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara) or Sweden (Stockholm = 6th) and Japan (Tokyo = 9th).

• The South East ranks 74th (it was 55th in 2005 and 40th in 2004). • London ranked 102nd in 2008 (it was 56th in 2005 and 46th in 2004).


Page 13 of 41

2j: International Case Studies Val d’Oise, France Val d’Oise is a department (county) located in the Île-de-France region, which is composed mainly of the Paris metropolitan area. It is a dynamic economy with a high quality of life and an attractive natural environment. Like Surrey, Val d’Oise has a strong economic relationship with the capital city. It sees itself as an extension of Greater Paris; a significant number of its residents commute to Paris, but proximity to the capital is both an economic boon and contributor to a number of economic challenges. The business profile of Val d’Oise primarily constitutes small and medium sized enterprises, although the department is also home to many large multi-national companies, including British Airways and JCB. The Charles de Gaulle airport has a significant impact on the local economy in a similar way to Heathrow and Gatwick in Surrey.

Like Surrey, the Val d’Oise contains many clusters of high technology businesses; these include software and digital industries, health/ biotechnology and aeronautics. Val-d’Oise prides itself on unsurpassed infrastructure. The department has one of the fastest broadband networks in France. In terms of transport, the department includes 68 railway stations (including five multi-functional stations able to handle freight) and is served by the TGV (high speed rail) offering direct international travel. Charles de Gaulle airport is integrated into the high-speed TGV network providing quick connections to locations across France and internationally. It is also well connected to the capital; it is the only department around Paris with access to RER (Underground) stations. The Val d’Oise has a network of roads linking economic centres, and investment is planned to further improve connections within the department.

In Val d’Oise the public sector has an interventionist approach to economic development. The Val d’Oise is the first department in the Île-de-France region to take a common approach to development planning. To encourage business, 300 hectares have been set aside to accommodate 120 business parks and 1.6% of the department’s territory is classified as an ‘economic activity zone’. An Economic Expansion Committee has been established. This body works alongside local authorities and other partners, offering practical support to businesses including information on fiscal and financial assistance, support for exporters and assistance for companies seeking to invest locally. It seeks to promote the local economy, acting as a voice for the area regionally, nationally and internationally (with offices in China and Japan). The Committee has also established business incubators with attractive conditions for start-up enterprises.


Page 14 of 41

Lüneburg, Germany Lüneburg is a district in Lower Saxony, south of Hamburg. It has a population of approximately 180,000 people; small relative to Surrey’s 1.1 million, but it shares many similarities with the county. Like Surrey, the district is ‘peri-urban’, having a close economic relationship with an adjacent large conurbation. The district lies on the fringes of the Hamburg Metropolitan Region, approximately 30 minutes away by train and, as such, faces familiar pressures to Surrey, including urban sprawl, environmental degradation and significant commuting. The district has more than 5000 businesses and small and medium-sized enterprises dominate the local economy. Leading sectors include environmental technologies, nutrition, information and communication technology and ‘mechatronics’. Tourism is also significant, taking advantage of Lüneburg town’s ‘chocolate box’ image.

The University of Lüneburg offers research and multi-faceted educational support to local enterprises. The presence of this university and other institutions in the Hamburg Metropolitan Region has enabled highly specialised and niche manufacturing to develop. Like the Val d’Oise, the public sector has taken an interventionist approach to economic development. An economic development company was established in 1993. The Wirtschaftsförderungs-GmbH assists local enterprises seeking to establish themselves in Lüneburg. It offers support to businesses in a number of areas, notably encouraging innovation and supporting business start-ups. In terms of innovation, the district is actively striving to encourage innovation. An initiative called ‘Information and Communication Management and Business in Lower Saxony’ aims to network IT enterprises with one another and facilitate entry into new high growth markets. State ‘promotion’ funds are used to support such activity; these funds match private sector finance to underwrite projects of significant value to the regional economy. Intensive assistance is also offered to support business start-ups, including links to credit

institutions and investors to encourage expansion. A ‘start-up studio’ is also available to coach emerging businesses.


Page 15 of 41

2k: Knowledge-based Businesses (Analysis of the UK Competitiveness Index, 2010) % of all businesses Rank (out of 380)

Elmbridge 35.9 6

Epsom & Ewell 29.1 36

Guildford 32.2 19

Mole Valley 31.3 25

Reigate and Banstead 29.3 34

Runnymede 27.1 55

Spelthorne 24.9 80

Surrey Heath 32.6 17

Tandridge 26.9 59

Waverley 32.5 18

Woking 33.9 10 Source data: Annual Business Inquiry (2008)


Page 16 of 41

3: BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE 3a: Business Size, 2008 Area Number of Employees 1-10 11-49 50-199 200+ Great Britain 85.0% 11.5% 2.8% 0.7% South East 86.6% 10.4% 2.5% 0.5% Surrey 88.2% 9.0% 2.3% 0.5%

Elmbridge 90.5% 7.1% 2.0% 0.4% Epsom & Ewell 87.1% 10.1% 2.4% 0.4% Guildford 86.5% 10.7% 2.4% 0.4% Mole Valley 89.3% 8.1% 2.2% 0.4% Reigate and Banstead 87.7% 9.2% 2.5% 0.6% Runnymede 86.9% 9.1% 3.0% 1.0% Spelthorne 86.7% 9.8% 3.1% 0.3% Surrey Heath 88.4% 9.0% 2.1% 0.5% Tandridge 89.3% 8.2% 2.2% 0.3% Waverley 89.4% 8.4% 1.9% 0.2% Woking 86.6% 10.1% 2.7% 0.6%

Berkshire 86.0% 10.5% 2.8% 0.8% Buckinghamshire 89.4% 8.2% 2.1% 0.3% Oxfordshire 86.1% 10.9% 2.4% 0.6% Cambridgeshire 86.4% 10.1% 2.8% 0.6%

Source: Annual Business Inquiry (2008)


Page 17 of 41

3b: Home-based Businesses, 2008 Area Home-based businesses North West Surrey 46 East Surrey 44 South West Surrey 43 Central Surrey 45 Surrey 44 South East 42

Source: Enterprise in Surrey: Key Statistics, Insights Research Programme, 2008


Page 18 of 41

3c: SEEDA Priority Sectors Financial and Professional services Seven of the 11 districts in the South East with the highest percentage share of financial and professional services businesses are in Surrey. Surrey is also home to a large number of the top 100 South East financial and professional services companies in this sector (by turnover). These are spread quite evenly across Surrey, but with particular clusters around Dorking, Epsom, Leatherhead, Guildford and Woking. They include the many financial headquarters that have moved to Surrey and have located themselves close to key hubs with good transport links, especially links into and out of London.

Source: SEEDA Priority Sectors (2010)


Page 19 of 41

ICT, Software and Digital Media ICT businesses are clustered in the districts to the west of the county (Elmbridge, Woking, Guildford and Surrey Heath) with the main clustering of top 100 companies in Guildford and around Staines, Egham and Woking.



Page 20 of 41

Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences and Healthcare Although Surrey has a number of the largest companies in this sector, overall concentration of businesses in the pharmaceuticals, life sciences and healthcare sectors is low. Surrey has a small number of significant (i.e. top 100) players, concentrated particularly in the north of the county, around Egham.



Page 21 of 41

Advanced Engineering and Marine While the location quotient is relatively low, Surrey has a good spread of top 100 companies, particularly in the north west of the county. These are found in Spelthorne (Staines) and Runnymede (Weybridge), as well as clusters in Mole Valley, particularly around Dorking.



Page 22 of 41

Environment and Energy Tandridge stands out as having the largest concentration of environment and energy companies but no top 100 companies. This is probably because most companies in the sector are small and medium-sized. Top 100 companies in this sector are clustered in the northern part of Mole Valley (around Dorking).



Page 23 of 41

Aerospace and Defence Unsurprisingly, Surrey has a large concentration of aerospace and defence businesses (including top 100 companies) based in the districts of Reigate and Banstead and Tandridge, due to the proximity of Gatwick Airport. There is also a concentration of aerospace and defence businesses in Spelthorne, although no presence of top 100 companies. A cluster of top 100 companies in the sector appears to the north of the county, in Elmbridge and Runnymede.



Page 24 of 41

3d: Business Survival Rates by Year of Birth, 2003 Year of ‘birth’ (2003) Births 1 Year

survival (%) 2 Year

survival (%)3 Year

survival (%)4 Year

survival (%)5 Year

survival (%) Great Britain 262,580 92.6 78.0 63.5 54.1 46.5 South East 41,855 93.3 80.1 66.3 56.7 49.1 Surrey 6,220 94.3 81.1 67.4 58.0 50.2 Berkshire Not

available2 Not

available Not

available Not

available Not

available Not available

Buckinghamshire 3,215 93.9 79.5 66.1 57.4 50.2 Oxfordshire 3,185 93.2 80.7 68.8 59.7 52.1 Cambridgeshire 2,745 92.0 78.3 65.8 57.0 49.7

Source: Business Demography 2008: Enterprise Births, Deaths and Survivals (ONS, 2008)

2 Data not available at a Berkshire ‘county’ level.


Page 25 of 41

4: LABOUR MARKET 4a: Economic Activity by District and Borough Area

Number % aged 16-64

Surrey 565,100 79.3 Runnymede 47,500 81.9 Tandridge 41,200 81.8 Woking 51,000 81.7 Guildford 72,000 80.0 Mole Valley 38,400 79.7 Reigate and Banstead 69,100 79.1 Waverley 55,300 78.5 Elmbridge 66,600 78.3 Epsom & Ewell 36,500 77.9 Spelthorne 46,300 77.3 Surrey Heath 41,200 76.5

Source: ONS, Annual Population Survey, April 2009 – March 2010


Page 26 of 41

4b: Resident Employment by Occupation, April 2009 - March 2010

GB South East Surrey Berks Bucks Cambs Oxfordshire

Soc 2000 major group 1-3 44.1 47.9 55.1 52.2 54.4 52.2 51.8 1: managers and senior officials 15.7 18.2 20.2 21.3 23.0 17.1 18.6 2: professional occupations 13.7 14.5 17.9 15.9 16.8 21.4 18.3 3: associate prof & tech occupations 14.7 15.2 17.0 15.0 14.6 13.7 14.9 Soc 2000 major group 4-5 21.6 21.4 20.7 19.6 23.3 19.5 16.8 4: administrative and secretarial occupations 11.2 11.6 11.8 11.7 12.9 9.3 9.4

5: skilled trades occupations 10.4 9.8 8.9 7.9 10.4 10.2 7.4 Soc 2000 major group 6-7 16.1 15.3 13.5 14.0 12.0 12.0 16.5 6: personal service occupations 8.7 8.6 7.2 7.6 6.8 7.5 9.8 7: sales and customer service occupations 7.4 6.7 6.3 6.4 5.2 4.5 6.7

Soc 2000 major group 8-9 17.7 15.0 10.8 13.8 10.2 15.9 14.9 8: process, plant and machine operatives 6.6 5.0 4.2 4.4 3.3 5.3 5.1

9: elementary occupations 11.1 10.0 6.6 9.4 6.9 10.6 9.8 Source: ONS Annual Population Survey. Notes: Numbers and percentages are for those aged 16+; percentage is a proportion of all persons in employment


Page 27 of 41

4c: Surrey Commuting Patterns by District, 2001

Source: Surrey County Council 2001 Commuting Summary (www.surreycc.gov.uk)


Page 28 of 41

4d: Out of Work Benefit Claimants, Totals and Rates (as a Proportion of the Resident Population of Surrey 16-64), February 2010 Claimant Type Surrey Numbers Surrey (%) South East (%) Great Britain (%) Total claimants 56,360 7.9 11.0 15.1 Job seekers 14,320 2.0 2.8 3.9 ESA and incapacity benefits 23,120 3.2 4.6 6.7

Lone parents 6,800 1.0 1.4 1.8 Carers 4,160 0.6 0.8 1.1 Others on income related benefits 1,610 0.2 0.4 0.5 Disabled 4,900 0.7 0.9 1.0 Bereaved 1,440 0.2 0.2 0.2 Key out-of-work benefits* 45,850 6.4 9.1 12.9 Source: DWP Benefit Claimants, February 2010 Note: *Consists of job seekers, incapacity benefits, lone parents and others on income related benefits


Page 29 of 41

4e: JSA Claimants as a Percentage of the Working Age Population, February 2006 - August 2010

Source: DWP Benefit Claimants, August 2010


Page 30 of 41

5: TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5a: Work Destination of Surrey Residents by Mode of Travel, 2001

Source: Transport Statistics for Surrey: Movement Monitoring Report, Surrey County Council, 2007 (quoted in the Surrey Infrastructure Capacity study, 2009)


Page 31 of 41

5b: Origin of Surrey’s Workforce by Mode of Travel, 2001

Source: Transport Statistics for Surrey: Movement Monitoring Report, Surrey County Council, 2007 (quoted in the Surrey Infrastructure Capacity study, 2009)


Page 32 of 41

5c: Affordability of Purchased Homes: Ratio of Price to Earnings (2000-2009) Area Ratio of lower quartile purchase prices to lower quartile earnings

2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009% change 2000-2005

% change 2005-2009

England 4.0 6.8 7.2 7.3 7.0 6.3 71.4 -7.9

South East 5.4 8.6 8.6 8.9 8.8 7.7 60.4 -10.3

Surrey 7.5 10.1 10.3 10.9 10.6 9.2 33.6 -8.5 Buckinghamshire 6.2 9.5 9.2 9.8 9.9 8.4 53.3 -11.4

Cambridgeshire 4.6 7.7 7.5 8.1 7.8 6.7 67.1 -12.7

Oxfordshire 6.3 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.6 8.5 43.0 -5.8 Source: Communities and Local Government, from Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, ONS, and Land Registry. 5d: Surrey Districts: Affordability of purchased homes; Ratio of Price to Earnings (2000-2009)

2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009% change 2000-2005

% change 2005-2009

Elmbridge 8.9 10.9 11.1 11.6 12.0 12.0 23.0 9.7 Epsom & Ewell 9.0 12.3 11.7 12.0 10.3 9.1 36.9 -26.2 Guildford 7.8 10.0 10.8 11.0 10.2 9.1 28.4 -9.3 Mole Valley 8.2 11.9 11.7 11.0 11.0 8.7 45.2 -27.0 Reigate and Banstead 6.5 9.4 9.4 9.8 9.9 8.4 43.7 -11.1 Runnymede 6.6 9.6 9.6 10.7 9.7 8.9 45.7 -7.5 Spelthorne 6.2 8.1 8.0 8.9 9.1 7.8 31.0 -3.3 Surrey Heath 7.1 9.6 10.5 10.9 10.5 8.6 35.8 -10.7 Tandridge 8.0 11.9 12.7 11.3 10.7 11.7 48.9 -1.8 Waverley 8.4 11.3 11.1 12.4 12.0 9.4 34.9 -16.6 Woking 6.9 10.0 9.3 10.4 10.3 10.4 44.0 4.1

Source: Communities and Local Government, from Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, ONS, and Land Registry


Page 33 of 41

6: SURREY’S PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES 6a: Mid-year Population Estimates, 2008 (Surrey and LEA Comparators)3

Age 0-14 Working Age 65+ All Ages % SE TotalSouth East 1,483,000 5,123,500 1,402,600 8,380,100Surrey 199,200 680,100 182,400 1,109,700 13.2%

Elmbridge 25,300 81,000 20,600 132,400 (11.9%)Epsom & Ewell 13,100 44,400 11,800 72,400 (6.5%)Guildford 22,300 87,700 20,300 135,700 (12.2%)Mole Valley 14,500 47,100 16,300 82,000 (7.4%)Reigate and Banstead 24,500 83,300 21,300 134,800 (12.1%)Runnymede 12,700 54,300 13,200 83,400 (7.5%)Spelthorne 15,700 55,800 16,000 91,200 (8.2%)Surrey Heath 16,000 51,000 12,700 83,400 (7.5%)Tandridge 15,300 49,400 14,700 83,500 (7.5%)Waverley 22,500 68,500 21,800 118,700 (10.7%)Woking 17,300 57,700 13,600 92,200 (8.3%)

Berkshire 157,200 535,800 110,100 836,300 10.0%Buckinghamshire 94,500 298,800 78,100 493,300 5.9%Cambridgeshire 103,000 383,200 93,300 605,000 7.2%Oxfordshire 112,000 405,600 96,000 639,800 7.6%

Source: ONS mid-year population estimates 2008 (NOMIS, May 2010) Note: Borough and District percentages relate to % of Surrey total

3 Please note that the figures for 2008 contained in this table are different to those in the main body of the report due to the fact that the 2008 mid-year estimates were revised between May 2010 and November 2010.


Page 34 of 41

6b: Population Density, 2007 Area (sq km)

(2007)Population ('000s)

Total (2007)People per sq km

(2007)

United Kingdom 242,495 60,975 251England 130,279 51,092 392South East 19,069 8,309 436Surrey 1,663 1,098 661 Elmbridge 95 131 1,378 Epsom & Ewell 34 71 2,082 Guildford 271 134 496 Mole Valley 258 81 314 Reigate and Banstead 129 132 1,025 Runnymede 78 83 1,058 Spelthorne 45 91 2,024 Surrey Heath 95 83 876 Tandridge 248 83 332 Waverley 345 118 341 Woking 64 91 1,437Berkshire4 Not available Not available Not availableBuckinghamshire 1,565 491 314Oxfordshire 2,605 636 244

Source: ONS (referenced in: Profile of Surrey, SEEDA draft, July 2009, unpublished)

4 Berkshire ‘county’ figure not available.


Page 35 of 41

6c: Components of Population Change Derived from the Mid-year Estimates, 2001-2007

Source: ONS (extract from Surrey County Council State of the County report, 2008)


Page 36 of 41

6d: Average Annual Net Migration into Surrey from the UK, 2002-2007

Source: ONS: National Health Service central register (extract from Surrey County Council State of the County report, 2008)


Page 37 of 41

6e: International Migration Inflow Rate, 20085

Source: ONS; Migration Statistics Unit; Population Statistics Unit

5 Data comes from the ONS using statistics gathered by the Population Estimates Unit and Migration Statistics Unit. They have been sourced from the ONS Migration Indicators Tool. They show the number of in-moving migrants to the area (international inflow) and out-moving migrants (international outflow) expressed as number per 1,000 resident population. ONS urge that the two figures should not be compared to get a composite figure for net gain/ loss. It should also be noted that these figures include students and it is suggested that the high figures for Cambridgeshire and Oxfordshire may be skewed by their international student population.


Page 38 of 41

6f: International Migration Outflow Rate, 2008

Source: ONS; Migration Statistics Unit; Population Statistics Unit


Page 39 of 41

6g: Migration Trends, 2002-2007 Population Net internal migration

(number) Net international migration

(number) Total

migration % of total

population

Mid-2007 2002 to 2003

2004 to 2005

2006 to 2007

2002 to 2003

2004 to 2005

2006 to 2007 2006 - 2007 2006-2007

SURREY 1.098,300 -1000 800 4900 3,100 5100 3800 8700 Elmbridge 131,000 -100 500 200 1,100 900 500 700 0.5% Epsom & Ewell 70,900 -200 100 600 200 500 500 1100 1.6% Guildford 134,400 -500 negligible 100 600 800 600 700 0.5% Mole Valley 81,200 600 200 800 -100 -100 -100 700 0.9% Reigate and Banstead 132,300 negligible 100 1,200 negligible 700 800 2000 1.5% Runnymede 82,600 -200 negligible 300 600 1,100 900 1200 1.5% Spelthorne 90,900 -500 -100 -200 100 200 100 -100 -0.1% Surrey Heath 83,300 negligible -100 300 200 300 200 500 0.6% Tandridge 82,500 200 300 700 100 300 300 1000 1.2% Waverley 117,800 300 negligible 800 100 200 -100 700 0.6% Woking 91,400 -600 -200 100 200 200 100 200 0.2% Source: ONS data referenced in: Profile of Surrey, SEEDA draft, July 2009, unpublished Note: Numbers refer to number of people migrating mid-year to mid-year


Page 40 of 41

6h. Health Summary for Surrey, 2009

Source: The Health Profile for Surrey (2009) produced by the Association of Public Health Observatories

the surrey local economic assessment technical annex ... · the surrey local economic assessment...

Documents