transforming your it infrastructure for improved roi...converged infrastructure reduced network cost...

Transforming your IT Infrastructure for

Improved ROI October 2013

1

Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

Legal Notices

This presentation is for informational purposes only. INTEL MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS SUMMARY.

Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products.

For more complete information about performance and benchmark results, visit www.intel.com/benchmarks

Intel, the Intel logo, and Xeon are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other.

* Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.


2

http://www.intel.com/benchmarks


Intel IT Data Center Transformation

Strategy

3


Vision: Run Intel data center service like a factory and apply breakthrough

technologies, solutions and processes to achieve industry leadership

Data Center Transformation Strategy

Build on practices established over the last decade. Improve the quality, velocity, and efficiency of data center services

4


Intel Data Center and Infrastructure Profile

5


Intel has five major functions (DOMES) driving DC requirements

Silicon Design Computing

• Chip Design & tapeout function

• HPC, Grid Computing

Office General Purpose

• Typical IT and internal customer services

Examples: email, collaboration tools

Manufacturing FAB/ATM

• Manufacturing computing that supports fabrication and assembly

Enterprise

• Enterprise applications supporting eBiz and ERP

D

O

M

E Services S

• External facing applications

Example: Intel® AppUp®

Diverse data center infrastructure capabilities support DOMES

Intel Data Center Profile

6


Intel IT Data Center Infrastructure Trends

7


56 48 45 39

20 29

40

53

69

93

124

27 31 38

45

61

82

107

11 15

21

32

43

58

79

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014 Y2015

Compute Servers (K)

EDA MIPS (10K)

Cores (10K)

Storage Raw (PB)

Intel Design Data Center Capacity Silicon design compute and storage demand vs utilization

8

EDA-MIPS – Electronic Design Automation Meaningful Indicator of Performance per System


2013 (plan) 2012

Design Data Center Spend and Capacity Trends

Faster server refresh rate gets data center facilities cost down

2010 2011

90

92

94

96

98

100

102

104

2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)

Design - Total Spends

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)

Design - Total Environment Units Growth

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2010 2011 2012 2013 (plan)

Design – Cost Per Unit (lower is better)

Head Count (BB+GB)

17%

Facilities 35% Server

25%

OS+mgmt 2%

Storage & BaR 14%

Network 7% Head Count

(BB+GB) 17%


21%

OS+mgmt 2%

Storage & BaR 16%

Network 8%

Head Count (BB+GB)

20%

Facilities 33%

Server 23%

OS+mgmt 2%

Storage & BaR 13%

Network 9%

Head Count (BB+GB)

22%


25%

OS+mgmt 2%

Storage & BaR 13%

Network 8%

100% 100%

102%

95% 100%

136%

183%

239% 100%

74%

56%

40%

9


Notes External pricing is based on volume list price; Minimum required internal IT heads to support external cloud is included; Full technical feasibility of ability to use External not done.; Overall MOR data jointly developed with Finance; External data to be reviewed with Finance

Large internal Design DC is Cost Competitive with External Cloud

External Comparison for Design DC Total and unit cost comparison

100%

186%

74%

121%

56% 62%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

200%

Design Internal

2010 Costs

Design External

2010 Estimated

Design Internal

2011 Costs

Design External

2011 Estimated

Design Internal

2012 Costs

Design External

2012 Estimated

26% Reduction

25% Reduction

35% Reduction

49% Reduction

2010 Costs 2011 Costs 2012 Costs

10


Intel Enterprise Data Center Capacity

6,256 5,746 4,601 3,895 3,524 3,224 2,924

7,684

9,977

13,014

16,103

19,807

24,362

29,966

6

7.5

10.5

11.8

14.8

18.4

23

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Y2012 Y2013 Y2014 Y2015

Sto

rag

e (

PB

)

Se

rve

r/O

S In

sta

nce

Co

un

t

Servers

Total OS Instances

Storage (PB)

11

Intel IT – Office/Enterprise compute and storage demand


2013 (plan) 2012 2010 2011

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2010 2011 2012 2013

(plan)

Design - Total Spends

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

2010 2011 2012 2013

(plan)

Design - Total Environment Units Growth

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2010 2011 2012 2013

(plan)

Design – Cost Per Unit (lower is better)

Head Count (BB+GB)

35%

Facilities 21%

Server 7%

OS+mgmt 7%

Storage & BaR 16%

Network 14%

Head Count (BB+GB)

34%

Facilities 20%

Server 7%

OS+mgmt 8%

Storage & BaR 16%

Network 15%

Head Count (BB+GB)

30%

Facilities 18%

Server 7%

OS+mgmt 9%

Storage & BaR 12%

Network 24%

Head Count (BB+GB)

27%

Facilities 19%

Server 6%

OS+mgmt 10%

Storage & BaR 12%

Network 26%

100% 105% 107%

90%

100%

131% 162%

200%

100%

80% 66%

45%

Enterprise Data Center Spend & Capacity Trends

Delayed server refresh increased cost on network & storage

12


Notes External pricing is based on volume list price; Minimum required internal IT heads to support external cloud is included; Full technical feasibility of ability to use External not done.; Overall MOR data jointly developed with Finance; External data to be reviewed with Finance

178%

100% 111%

142%

84% 92%

117%

58% 66%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

200%

O+E Internal 2010

Costs

(Physical+Virtual)

O+E Internal 2010

Costs (Virtual)

O+E External

2010 Estimated

(Virtual)

O+E Internal 2011

Costs

(Physical+Virtual)

O+E Internal 2011

Costs (Virtual)

O+E External

2011 Estimated

(Virtual)

O+E Internal 2012

Costs

(Physical+Virtual)

O+E Internal 2012

Costs (Virtual)

O+E External

2012 Estimated

(Virtual)

31% Reduction

16% Reduction

17% Reduction

2010 Costs 2011 Costs 2012 Costs

Internal virtual offerings are in line with external cloud costs

External Comparison for O&E DC Total and unit cost comparison

29% Reduction

13


Reducing Rack Cost through Converged

Infrastructure

14


Converged infrastructure reduced network cost

Effect of Converged Infrastructure Infrastructure capital costs for virtualized environment (per host)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Rackmount

Server

Multiple GigE

Rackmount

Server 10GbE

Gen-1

Integrated

Appliance

Gen-2

Integrated

Appliance

Server

Ethernet/FC

Connectivity

65.5%

34.5%

65.5%

23.9%

56.5%

3.6%

53.4%

3.6%

39% Reduction

15


Intel Tapeout HPC Case Study

16


Intel IT Tapeout Compute Challenge

• Deliver 10x more computing

• Reduce tapeout from 25 days to 10 days

• Find greater than 128GB RAM servers

• Increase compute environment reliability

• Reduce capital spending by $20 Million

• Make it all happen in 11 months

17


Delivered Scale & Increased Reliability

18


Higher Density, Superior Performance, and

Lower Power

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or

configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the

performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

Dual-Core Intel® Xeon®

Processor 5150-based

servers

Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor

X5355-based servers


E5450-based servers


X5570-based servers

Six-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor

X5670-based servers

Servers 30 15 10 6 4

RAM per server

RAM per core

16 GB 4 GB

32 GB 4 GB

32 GB 4 GB

24 GB 3 GB

48 GB 4 GB

Total power consumed

9,360 Watts 6,450 Watts 3,200 Watts 2,250 Watts 1,532 Watts

Distributed OPC jobs

120 120 80 78 72

Time(mm:ss) 11:41 11:04 11:36 10:25 11:12

OPC – Optical Proximity Correction

10:57

Eight-Core Intel® Xeon® Processor

E5-2670-based servers

3

64 GB 4 GB

1,218 Watts

48

Intel® processor-based multi-core servers offer significant Data Center efficiency!

19

http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm


Intel internal measurements May 2007, November 2007, February 2009, March 2010, February 2012

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system

hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering

purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

Intel® Architecture Delivering Consistent

Performance Improvement for OPC

1 1.34 2.98

5 6.6

11.39

16.73

25.99

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Xeon 1MB L2

(NCN 3.6)

Xeon 2MB L2

(IRW 3.8)

Xeon 5160

(WDC 3.0)

Xeon X5365

(CVT 3.0)

Xeon X5460

(HPT 3.16)

Xeon X5570

(NHM 2.93)

Xeon X5675

(WSM 3.06)

Xeon E5-2680

(SNB 2.7)

Intel architecture performance improvement for Optical Proximity Correction

Re

lati

ve

Th

rou

gh

pu

t

20

http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm


Intel IT HPC Results Summary

HPC has offered significant business value to Intel silicon tapeout

• Met 13X increase in compute demand with 11x improvement in stability

• $44.72M net present value to Intel

21

HPC has improved Intel’s ability to bring newer chips to market more

quickly

• Reduced tapeout time from 25 days to 6 days (65nm to 45nm)


EDA Application Throughput Enhancer Intel SSD-Based ‘Fast Swap’ Compute Platform

22


Intel SSD Enabling Core Over Subscription

1.33 1.22

1.37 1.29 1.30

1.37

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

Core Workload Uncore Workload FullChip Workload Core Workload Uncore Workload FullChip Workload

SLES10SP3 SLES11SP1

Throughput Gain with HT and Intel SSD

Base HT-SSD

As of September 2013, we have deployed more than 13,000 Intel SSDs for more than $10M in IT business value

SSDs deployed (Q4'12 -Q3'13) 13,319

Additional Server Capacity Gained 2,615

Net Power Saved in terms of servers 1,151

Total Data Center Rack avoidance 47

Total 10GbE port avoidance 94

23

Copyright © 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. 24

RTL Throughput gain with job slots increase

SNB Core workload with HT (32 Jobs – No Swap)

SNB Uncore workload with HT & SSD swap (Swap: Peak 62GB, Avg 43GB)

SNB Fullchip workload with SSD swap (Swap: Peak 86GB, Avg 59GB)

Gain is 29%-37% for RTL Simulation Throughput with SLES11-SP1

Gain is 22%-37% for RTL Simulation Throughput with SLES10-SP3

24


EDA Application Performance Enhancer Higher Clock 1S Intel Xeon-based Platform

25


2S vs 1S Server Rack Comparison

3x1S servers = 1x 2S server on throughput basis

2S vs 1S server comparison ratios: • Number of cores difference is 4:1

• Throughput difference is 3:1

• Cost difference is 3:1

Intel Xeon E3-1280v2 3.6GHz, 4-cores/8MB,

(TDP:69W) Supports 32GB memory & 4 drives

Cost, DC space, TPT near neutral - EDA license count, power, performance positive

26

SandyBridge-EP Blade-based 3-chassis Rack

IvyBridge-based 12-chassis Rack

Power Per Rack (KW) 17.14 15.14

Data Center Space 1 Rack 1 Rack

Number of Servers 48 144

Number of IA CPU Sockets 96 144

Number of IA Cores 768 576

Memory Per Core 8GB 8GB

EDA Licenses Need (%) 100% 75%

EDA Throughput Per RACK 100% 95%

EDA Performance 100% 127%


Specifications, Performance, Throughput

Better performance, equal throughput with 25% Fewer Cores require 25% less number of EDA application licenses

Server Specifications

Components Intel Xeon E5-2670 (2.6GHz) Intel Xeon E3-1280v2 (3.6GHz)

Form Factor 16 Blades in 10U 12 SLED's in 3U

CPU 2 x 2.6GHz 1 x 3.6GHz

TDP 115W 69W

Cores Eight Quad

Memory 8GB x16, 128GB 8GB x 4, 32GB

L3 Cache 20MB Shared 8MB Shared

QPI Speed 8.0 GT/s Not Applicable

Max HD Supported and Type 2 x SAS Drives 4 x SATA Drives

Network 1GbE or 10GbE Shared 2 x 1GbE (front) per server

Runtime Summary

Workload

2S Xeon E5-2670

(2.6GHz/20M/115W/8C)

128GB

1S Xeon E3-1280v2

(3.6GHz/8M/69W/4C)

32GB

VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 3:06:05 9:45:46

VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 13:57:03 43:26:11

Raw Performance

VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 1.27

VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 1.28

Average (Higher is Better) 1.00 1.27

Throughput

VCS Core - N++ (113 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 0.32

VCS Uncore - N++ (111 Tests) 16J/4J 1.00 0.32

Average (Higher is Better) 1.00 0.32

27


Intel IT Data Center Facility Consolidation

28


Intel DC space, power and cooling distribution

Power & C ooling C apacity

Power (MW ) 52.18

C ooling (MW ) 57.40

Data center consolidation to optimally meet business demand

Segment Space (Sqft) DC# Space (Sqft) DC#

Design 211,474 26 162,570 22

Manufacturing 124,863 29 124,863 29

OES 64,620 9 62,907 8

Mixed 18,320 4 18,320 4

Grand Total 419,277 68 368,660 63

EOY 2012 EOY 2013 (Planned)

Fewer data centers meeting compute demand

Data Center Facility Reduction

29

100% 97% 93% 87%

76%

152

136

91

68 63

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0%2003 2005 2011 2012 2013

Square Ft.

Data Centers

Intel Data Centers (2003-2013)

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000


Goal: 90 to 59 in 2 years, Completed Execution

• DC Strategy on facilities reduction set in June 2011 to go from 90 data centers

to 59 in 2 years

• Actual is trending to 58 data centers vs. goal of 59 data centers

Right focus to find IT cost efficiency

Data Center Facility Reduction

DC Count DC SqFt Distribution

Dispose 32

Keep 58

ITIR+xCR 23,609 SF

27.65%

Give Back 61,770 SF

72.35%

30


Intel IT Data Center Strategy Key Summary

31


Goals

Vision: Run Intel data center service like a factory and apply breakthrough

technologies, solutions and processes to achieve industry leadership

2013-2015 Focus

DC Optimization

Vectors

MOR

POR

Drive LAN/WAN Efficiency

Adopt Open Source Storage

Embrace Disruptive Servers

Increase Facilities Efficiency

Scope

Cost: >10% YOY improvement in $ per service delivery Utilization: >80% “useful utilization” of data center facilities, NW, server, storage capacity SLA: >99% of Tier-1, >95% of Tier-2 & Tier-3 Infrastructure SLA met

Intel Data Center Strategy

32

OS

Virtualization

Server, Storage, BaR

Facilities

Middleware (NetBatch, NUMABooster, START, etc) Utilization Cost

SLA


Dive deeper into the information discussed today in these white papers.

You can find them all at www.intel.com/IT

Sharing Intel IT Best Practices with the World

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/it-management/intel-it-best-practices/data-storage-solutions-paper.html?wapkw=storage+paper+data+center

Intel Confidential — Do Not Forward

transforming your it infrastructure for improved roi...converged infrastructure reduced network cost...

Documents