ucerf3 task r6 fault to fault jumping probabilities: empirical surface rupture database

15
UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface Rupture Database

Upload: yoshe

Post on 22-Mar-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface Rupture Database. Viable ruptures Distance between fault sections (e.g. 5 km) Strikes can’t vary by more than some amount between neighboring subsections (e.g., 45 degrees ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

UCERF3

Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities:Empirical Surface Rupture Database

Page 2: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

Viable ruptures

• Distance between fault sections (e.g. 5 km)

• Strikes can’t vary by more than some amount between neighboring subsections (e.g., 45 degrees)

• Strikes can’t change by more than some total amount along the rupture length (e.g., 90 degrees)

• Rakes can’t change by more than some amount between subsections (e.g., 90 degrees)

• Ruptures can’t include a given subsection more than once (e.g., preventing ruptures from looping back on themselves)

Page 3: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

Empirical Database for fault to fault ruptures

Steve Wesnousky’s empirical database for fault steps

Page 4: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1990 Luzon, Philippines

Surface Ruptures

Page 5: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1992 Landers

Surface Ruptures

Page 6: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

2002 Denali, Alaska

Surface Ruptures

Page 7: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

2001 Kulun, China

Surface Ruptures

Page 8: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

Surface Ruptures

1857 Fort Tejon

Page 9: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1939 Erzincan, Turkey

Surface Ruptures

Page 10: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1943 Tosya, Turkey

Surface Ruptures

Page 11: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1945 Mikawa, Japan

Surface Ruptures

Page 12: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1986 Marryat, Australia

Surface Ruptures

Page 13: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

Rakes can’t change by more than some amount between subsections (e.g., 90 degrees)

Page 14: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database

1891 Neodani

Surface Ruptures

Page 15: UCERF3 Task R6 Fault to Fault Jumping Probabilities: Empirical Surface  Rupture Database