understanding and using feedback from the primary information systems dr chris jellis...

25
Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis [email protected]

Upload: lisa-bell

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems

Dr Chris Jellis

[email protected]

Page 2: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

PIPS and InCAS have Different Feedback

• PIPS feedback uses Standardised Scores– Good for comparing yeargroups and cohorts– Good for assigning pupils to ability groups– Good for measuring progress

• InCAS feedback uses age equivalent scores– Gives a good idea of how far ahead or behind

individual pupils are– Good to use diagnostically

Page 3: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

PIPS Reception

• Provides initial information about pupils when they enter the school

• Provides progress information for the Reception year

• Most feedback is similar to later years PIPS, with a couple of exceptions

Page 4: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Start of Reception Box and Whisker

Standardised scores

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Early

Mat

hsEa

rly R

eadi

ng

Page 5: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

End of ReceptionLine Graph

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Start End

Read

ing

Raw

Sco

res

(Sta

rt)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Read

ing

Raw

Sco

res

(End

)

Page 6: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

PIPS Feedback

• Standardised Scores Table• Grades Table• Value Added Scatter Plot• Key Stage Chances

Page 7: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Year 3 Scores TablePredictors

picture non verbal

class name vocabulary ability context prior maths readingEXAMPLE Susan 72 42 60 * 41 33EXAMPLE Luke 38 61 49 43 43 32EXAMPLE John 47 45 46 * 35 42EXAMPLE Andrew 50 57 52 46 44 37EXAMPLE Sarah 49 42 46 47 51 34EXAMPLE Helen 46 45 45 42 45 44EXAMPLE Vicky 45 44 45 45 51 43EXAMPLE Harry 56 34 47 45 48 46EXAMPLE Kate 52 44 48 42 52 43EXAMPLE Christine 55 49 51 50 47 50EXAMPLE Stephen 56 49 53 * 45 52EXAMPLE Karen 53 61 56 46 52 48EXAMPLE Roger 50 33 42 35 56 45EXAMPLE Scott 53 60 56 45 56 49EXAMPLE Daniel 58 52 54 52 61 48EXAMPLE Michael 55 60 57 53 61 50EXAMPLE Christopher * * * 55 61 53EXAMPLE Faye 59 67 62 63 53 62EXAMPLE Chloe 50 71 57 * 58 58EXAMPLE Callum 55 67 60 53 55 65EXAMPLE Andrew 56 69 61 59 56 64EXAMPLE Brian 61 47 54 52 67 53EXAMPLE Nicole 58 63 57 * 63 63EXAMPLE David 61 70 64 59 65 62EXAMPLE Amanda 75 70 71 71 61 66

Attainment

Page 8: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Standardised Scores

• Mean of 50, Standard Deviation of 10

• Between 40 and 60 – Average (68%)• Between 30 and 40 – Below average (14%)• Below 30 – well below average (2%)• Between 60 and 70 – Above average (14%)• Above 70 – Well above average (2%)

Page 9: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Year 3 Grades TableAttitudes

name grade context prior grade context prior maths reading school

Susan D -- * E -- * Luke D - 0 E -- -- John E -- * D - *

Andrew C - 0 E -- -- Sarah C 0 0 E -- -- Helen C 0 0 C 0 0 Vicky C + + D 0 0 Harry C 0 0 C 0 0 Kate C 0 + D - 0

Christine C 0 0 C 0 0 Stephen C - * C 0 * Karen C 0 + C - 0 Roger C ++ ++ C 0 + Scott C 0 ++ C - 0 Daniel B + ++ C - 0

Michael B + + C - 0 Christopher B * + C * 0

Faye C - - B 0 0 Chloe B 0 * B 0 *

Callum C 0 0 A + ++ Andrew C 0 0 A 0 + Brian A ++ ++ C 0 0 Nicole B + * A + * David A 0 + B 0 +

Amanda B - 0 A 0 0

value added value added

Achievementmaths reading

Page 10: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Grade BoundariesGrade %age

A 10%

B 15%

C 50%

D 15%

E 10%

Page 11: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Year 3 Scatter Plot

Context Score

Attai

nmen

t Sco

re

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 7025 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

2

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

AmandaDavid

Faye

Andrew

Callum

Susan

Nicole

Chloe

Michael

Scott

Karen

Brian

Daniel

StephenChristine

Luke

Kate

Harry

John

Vicky

Helen

Roger

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Page 12: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Predicted Key Stage 2 LevelsMaths level English level Science Level

class name <2 3 4 5 >6 3 4 5 3 4 5

1 30 48 21 0 1 29 51 18 0 1 23 54 22 0EXAMPLE Susan 2 49 43 6 - 2 48 45 5 - 1 40 52 7 -EXAMPLE Luke 4 59 33 3 - 4 59 35 2 - 3 52 42 3 -EXAMPLE John 4 59 33 3 - 4 59 35 2 - 3 52 42 3 -EXAMPLE Andrew 3 52 41 5 - 2 51 43 4 - 1 43 50 6 -EXAMPLE Sarah 3 52 41 5 - 2 51 43 4 - 1 43 50 6 -EXAMPLE Helen 2 49 43 6 - 2 48 45 5 - 1 40 52 7 -EXAMPLE Vicky 2 46 45 7 - 2 45 48 6 - 1 37 54 8 -EXAMPLE Harry 2 43 47 8 - 1 42 50 7 - 1 34 56 9 -EXAMPLE Kate 1 40 49 10 - 1 39 52 8 - 1 31 58 11 -EXAMPLE Christine 1 37 51 11 - 1 36 54 9 - 1 28 59 12 -EXAMPLE Stephen 1 34 52 13 - 1 33 56 11 - - 26 60 14 -EXAMPLE Karen 1 28 54 17 - 1 27 58 14 - - 21 61 18 -EXAMPLE Roger 1 40 49 10 - 1 39 52 8 - 1 31 58 11 -EXAMPLE Scott - 23 55 21 - - 22 60 18 - - 16 61 22 -EXAMPLE Daniel - 23 55 21 - - 22 60 18 - - 16 61 22 -EXAMPLE Michael - 18 55 26 - - 17 60 23 - - 13 59 28 -EXAMPLE Christopher - 16 54 29 - - 15 59 25 - - 11 58 30 -EXAMPLE Faye - 12 52 35 - - 12 57 31 - - 8 55 36 -EXAMPLE Chloe - 14 53 32 - - 14 58 28 - - 10 57 33 -EXAMPLE Callum - 11 51 38 - - 10 56 34 - - 7 53 39 1EXAMPLE Andrew - 11 51 38 - - 10 56 34 - - 7 53 39 1EXAMPLE Brian - 14 53 32 - - 14 58 28 - - 10 57 33 -EXAMPLE Nicole - 9 49 41 - - 9 54 37 - - 6 51 43 1EXAMPLE David - 6 43 50 1 - 6 48 46 - - 4 44 52 1EXAMPLE Amanda - 4 39 56 1 - 4 43 53 - - 3 38 58 1

Keystage Two Chances (%)

Year Group Average

Page 13: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

InCAS Feedback

• Age Equivalent Scores Table• Differences Table• Box and Whisker Plots• Diagnostic data• Longitudinal plots• Standardised scores

Page 14: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Age Equivalent Scores

Page 15: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Age Differences

Page 16: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Box and Whisker Plot (single class)

Page 17: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Box and Whisker Plot (multiple classes)

Page 18: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Diagnostic Plots

Page 19: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Longitudinal Plot

Page 20: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Standardised Scores

Mean = 100, sd = 15

Page 21: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Standardised Scores

• Mean of 100, Standard Deviation of 15

• Between 85 and 115 – Average (68%)• Between 70 and 85 – Below average (14%)• Below 70 – Well below average (2%)• Between 115 and 130 – Above average (14%)• Above 130 – Well above average (2%)

Page 22: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Comparing InCAS and PIPS

• PIPS• Standardised scores are more difficult to

understand, but good for comparing children and groups

• InCAS• Age scores are clearer, but with no standard

deviation, it is difficult to tell what the range is

Page 23: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Administration

• InCAS– Administer at any time of year– CD (installed on school network)– Group assessment– Feedback

• Within 24 hours

• PIPS– Fixed assessment periods– Pencil and paper or CD (installed on school

network)– Group assessment– Feedback

• Approx 6 weeks for pencil and paper• Quicker for CD

Page 24: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

So, which do you choose?

• To establish a baseline (particularly in the early years) and show progress - PIPS

• If the group is not average – InCAS• If you need diagnostic information – InCAS• Some schools do both

Page 25: Understanding and Using Feedback from the Primary Information Systems Dr Chris Jellis chris.jellis@cem.dur.ac.uk

Any Questions?

Dr Chris JellisResearch Associate

CEM