unit one: “making sense of other people” 3) development of

45
Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of amac edu 2011 amac edu 2011

Upload: nova

Post on 05-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of.  amac edu 2011. Personality. The word and concept of personality is common in everyday language (eg. “ He has a nice personality” ). However, most use it without thinking what it actually means. Some thoughts: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Unit One:

“Making sense of other people”

3) Development of

amac edu 2011amac edu 2011

Page 2: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

PersonalityPersonality The word and concept of personality is

common in everyday language (eg. “He has a nice personality”). However, most use it without thinking what it actually means.

Some thoughts:1. How are people different?2. Can people change completely?3. Are these differences apparent at all ages?4. Try creating your own definition of

personality (think 1 to 3 above):

Page 3: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

A Definition of PersonalityA Definition of Personality

“Measurable types, traits and temperaments which make you who you are and different from other people”

Page 4: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

The strange case of Phineas Gage

• Phineas Gage (died 1860) was an American railroad construction foreman now remembered for surviving an accident in which a large iron bar passed through his brain…

What does this suggest about personality?

Page 5: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

The Three Personality T’s

1. Type

Usually Type A or Type B (there are other types and combinations). A = Aggressive/Conflictual and B = Passive/conflict avoidant (in general)

2. Temperament

How we appear/interact with others (Easily – Difficult – Slow to warm-up)

3. Trait

Extrovert (social) – Introvert (quiet) – Neurotic (anxious)

Your personality is a combination of these three factors

Page 6: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Important point… They are all biological (inherited) and to a large

extent ‘life-time stable’. They are better understood as the ‘underlying foundations’ of who we are and how we interact/learn with/from the environment.

Miserable Baby Miserable Man Miserable ‘Old Git’ [sic]

Page 7: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Personality ‘TYPES’

Q. when you play games or sport do you always play to win rather than just play for fun?

1. Usually play to win = Type A behaviour (competitive)

2. Prefer to play for fun = Type B behaviour (non-competitive)

Page 8: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Which ‘type’ are you?

Type A

Up front

Conflictual

Competitive

Time urgent

Hostile and aggressive

Type B

Laid Back

Avoids Conflict

Relaxed

One thing at a time

Empathetic (Express feelings)

or

Which type you are most like…Which type you are most like…

Page 9: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Personality ‘TYPES’Personality ‘TYPES’ Type "A" – Are highly independent and driven by risk. They

tend to be physical, conflictual, competitive and time urgent (mostly male).

Type "B" - Represents highly extroverted people, they are very entertaining and possess strong charisma. Often laid back and conflict avoidant

Type "C" - The opposite of Type "B"; they are introverted, very cautious and reserved.

Type "D" – They prefer the tedium of routine. They are not adventurous, resist responsibility and prefer to be told what to do

Some scales go to ‘Type F’ and beyond. In reality most people are a combination of types and this is often determined by situational factors. Evaluation: Are these ‘types’ broad enough to cover everyone and all ages?

Page 10: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Next: TEMPERAMENT

• ““refers to the (biologically) refers to the (biologically) inherited aspects of inherited aspects of personality. It is the way personality. It is the way people respond to the people respond to the environment”environment”

• Temperament is also life long stable

Page 11: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

STUDIES OF TEMPERAMENT:THOMAS, CHESS AND BIRCH (1977)Aim:Aim: To discover whether temperament is stable throughout life

MethodMethod: observed 133 children from infancy behaviour to early adulthood behaviour and their parents were interviewed about the children as babies

ResultsResults: children fell into three types: “Easy”, “Difficult”, and “Slow to warm up”. Easy children were happy, flexible, and regular. The Difficult children were demanding, inflexible and cried a lot. The children that were “slow to warm up” didn't respond well to change or new experiences to begin with, but once adapted they were usually happy

ConclusionsConclusions: The three basic temperaments stayed with the children as they developed through to adulthood; therefore concluded that temperament is innate (genetically inherited) and life-long stable

Page 12: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EVALUATION ACTIVITYEVALUATION ACTIVITY This was a longitudinal study (what is a cross-sectional

study?). Can you think of the advantages and disadvantages of carrying a longitudinal study?

All children were from middle class families. What's the problem with choosing p’s from only one section of society?

Parents were interviewed for this study. Outline one drawback of asking parents about

their own children

Q) What is meant by ‘innate’ & ‘life-long stable’?

Page 13: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Before we move on: What is the rationale of ‘Twin Studies’?

Define:• DNA:

• MZ:

• MZa:

• DZ:

• Concordance:

• Rationale of…

Page 14: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

DZ Twins MZa Twins

If temperament is If temperament is

If temperament is If temperament is

The basic rationale

Page 15: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of
Page 16: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

TWIN STUDIES & TEMPERAMENTBUSS AND PLOMIN (1984)

Aim: To determine Aim: To determine temperament and innateness

MethodMethod: 228 MZ twins and 172 DZ. They rated concordance for temperament factors at 5years old. They look at these three dimensions of behaviour:

1. Emotionality-how strong the child’s emotional response was

2. Activity- how energetic the child was

3. Sociability-how much the child wanted to be with other people.

ResultsResults: closer relationship for MZ’s than DZ’s

ConclusionConclusion: Temperament has a genetic basis

Page 17: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EVALUATION OF EVALUATION OF BUSS AND PLOMIN (1984)BUSS AND PLOMIN (1984)

Supports a genetic basis (it demonstrates that genetically identical twins were more similar in emotionality, activity and sociability than non- genetically-identical twins).

However could be that identical twins are treated very similarly and experience very similar situations, especially when children. This means environmental learning could account for the similarities.

Hard to generalise from twins to the general population, because we are not all twins (sampling bias).

Further research: Read Kagan & Snidman 1991 p41

Do AMRC

Page 18: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

HOW IS PERSONALITY MEASURED?

Page 19: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYOF PERSONALITY

• Eysenck believed that there are

different personality types.

His theory is therefore described

as a type theorytype theory. For each

personality type there are associated traits.

• The personality types he identified include extroversion, introversion and neuroticism.extroversion, introversion and neuroticism.

• Extroverts look to other people and the outside world for entertainment while introverts are content with their own thoughts and ideas.

Page 20: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYTHEORY OF PERSONALITY

Extroverts• Are open and often talkative• Compare their own opinions with the opinions of

others• Like action and initiative• Easily make new friends or adapt to a new group• Say what they think• Are interested in new people• Easily break unwanted relations

Page 21: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYOF PERSONALITYIntroverts• Are interested in their own

thoughts and feelings• Need to have own territory• Often appear reserved, quiet and thoughtful• Usually do not have many friends• Have difficulties in making new contacts• Like concentration and quiet• Do not like the unexpected

Page 22: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYOF PERSONALITY

Neurotics

• A personality type that describes people who are highly emotional and show a quick, intense reaction to fear.

Page 23: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYOF PERSONALITY

• Eysenck believed that these different personality types were cause by the type of nervous type that the individual inherits.

• For example, in neurotics, the nervous system reacts quickly and strongly to stress.

• To test his ideas he carried out a study in 1947

A biological theory of personality

Page 24: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY EYSENCK’S TYPE THEORY OF PERSONALITYOF PERSONALITY

AimAim: To investigate the personality of

700 servicemen

MethodMethod: Each soldier completed a

questionnaire.

Eysenck analysed the results using

statistical technique called factor analysis.

ResultsResults: He indentified two dimensions of personality:

extroversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability

ConclusionsConclusions: Everyone can be placed along these two dimension of personality. Most people lie in the middle of the scale. (HALF-WAY)

Page 25: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of
Page 26: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EVALUATION OF EVALUATION OF EYSENCK'S WORKEYSENCK'S WORK

His original research used a limited sample of servicemen to test his ideas (sample bias, so hard to generalise). However later research was carried out on 1000s of people and supported Eysenck’s ideas

He only described a limited number of personality types.

Questionnaires can present researchers with a number of problems (eg. people may not be 100% truthful)

Why is personality as inherited a potential problem? (Determinism)

Page 27: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

PERSONALITY SCALESPERSONALITY SCALES• Eysenck developed a

number of personality personality scales to measure scales to measure personality types.personality types.

Including:

The Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI)

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ)

Page 28: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Personality ScalesPersonality ScalesThe Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI)The Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI)

This scale measures extroversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability.

It is made out of a series of yes/no questions, the answers can help identify the person’s personality

The two dimensions are not related so the person can be identified as a neurotic

introvert, a stable extrovert

or a stable introvert

Page 29: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ)

• This scale is also used to measure introversion, extroversion and neuroticism.

• A new dimension to personality was added to this scale, PsychoticismPsychoticism.

• Most people score low on this dimension. However those with a high score are hostile, aggressive, insensitive, cruel, and lacking in feelings

Page 30: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

WHAT IS ANTISOCIAL WHAT IS ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER?PERSONALITY DISORDER?

Page 31: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY

DISORDER (APD)(APD)

• It is possible to confuse anti-social behaviour with antisocial personality disorder.

• Some may commit antisocial acts, or behave in antisocial manner but may not be suffering from APD

• Also suffering from APD doesn't mean that you have poor social skills...is a bit more complex that this...

Page 32: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

People with APD do not abide by the law, they lie, steal and can at times be aggressive.

They find it hard to keep a job and meet their responsibilities as parents & partners.

They can find it hard to make and keep meaningful friendships, but this doesn't mean that they aren’t witty and charming.

It affects about 3% of males and about 1% of females and about 75% of the prison population suffers from this condition...cause and effect?

Antisocial Personality disorder is a Psychological condition in which sufferers ignore the right of others and do not behave in a socially acceptable manner.

Page 33: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDERDISORDERPattern of behavioursince age 15 (although only adults 18 years+ can be diagnosed) The symptoms :failure to conform to social norms  repeatedly performing unlawful acts that are grounds for arrestdeceitfulness, impulsivity or failure to plan ahead

Page 34: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Cont…irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults

reckless disregard for safety of self or others

consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behaviour or honour financial obligations

lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

Page 35: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

Difference: Psychopath and Sociopath• The DSM IV lists both under the

heading of Anti-social Personality Disorder.

• Both will engage in behavior that harms others with no feeling of guilt or remorse.

• Sociopaths are seen as disorganized and rash, making impulse led, extreme responses to normal situations. Psychopaths, by contrast, are highly organized, often secretly planning out and fantasizing in great detail before actually committing them, and sometimes manipulating people around them.

Was Hannibal (Silence of the Lambs) a Psychopath or Sociopath?

Page 36: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

WHAT CAUSES ANTI-SOCIAL

PERSONALITY DISORDER?

Are Criminals Are Criminals Born or Made?Born or Made?

Page 37: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF APDAPD

• Many people believe that there are biological causes for APD.

• They are particularly interested in brain abnormalities, specifically the specifically the Amygdala (Amygdala (controls emotionscontrols emotions) and ) and the prefrontal cortex (higher order the prefrontal cortex (higher order thinking) areas of the brain.thinking) areas of the brain.

Page 38: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS APD & AMYGDALA

• The Amygdala is responsible for learning from negative consequences of our actions

• It responds to fear and sad facial expressions• So we usually learn to avoid behaviours that upset

others• However, it is believed that the Amygdala is

impaired in people with APD.• As a result, they do not learn to avoid behaviour

that harms others- sadness and fear of others do not affect them

Page 39: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF APDTHE PREFRONTAL CORTEX FUNCTIONS

• People with APD have been known to have smaller prefrontal cortices

• Again, the prefrontal cortex is an area involved with in moral and social behaviour and guilt.

• So if smaller they may well feel less remorse and guilt

Page 40: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

KEY RESEARCHKEY RESEARCHRAINE ET AL (2000)RAINE ET AL (2000)Aim: To support the theory that an abnormal prefrontal

cortex causes APD

Method: MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging) was used to test 21 men with APD and a control group of 34 healthy males. PS all volunteers.

Results: The APD group had an 11% reduction in prefrontal grey tissue compared with the control group

Conclusion: APD is caused by a reduced prefrontal cortex

Page 41: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EVALUATION OF EVALUATION OF RAINE ET AL (2000)RAINE ET AL (2000) It adds support to the idea that there

are biological explanations for APD. A brain abnormality in the prefrontal cortex

Only males- Andocentric bias

Volunteer p’s. Not a representative sample to generalise from…

- The complexity and all the amazing things the brain is capable of rarely are the result of a single brain

structure. Instead the brain relies in a complex network of structures intercommunicating with each other. So we can conclude that the cause of APD is

more complex that what these results suggest!

Page 42: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

SITUATIONAL EXPLANATIONS OF SITUATIONAL EXPLANATIONS OF APDAPD

In contrast to Biological explanations, it may be the case that APD is caused by situational factors.

That is factors relating to the situation people are brought up in (nurture)

Which factors could we include under this explanation? – Socioeconomic factors- income and housing– Quality of life at home – Educational factors including low school

achievement and leaving school early

Page 43: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

KEY RESEARCHKEY RESEARCHFARRINGTON (1995)FARRINGTON (1995)Aim: to investigate antisocial behaviour in males from

childhood to the age of 50

Method: longitudinal study of 411 males (8-50yrs old). Deprived areas of inner London. Parents and teachers were all interviewed and family criminal records checked.

Results: 41% were convicted of at least one offence between the age of 10 and 50 (factors for offending were criminal behaviour in the family, low school achievement, poverty and poor parenting)

Conclusion: situational factors lead to the development of Antisocial Behaviour.

Page 44: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

EVALUATION OF FARRIGNTON (1995)

Longitudinal study. Attrition?

Not a controlled study, which factor of the ones identified was the most important? Also, biological factors were not investigated.

All Male pp’s

Interviews lend themselves for people to give socially desirable answers- people basically lie to make themselves look good

Page 45: Unit One: “Making sense of other people” 3) Development of

THETHE

ENDEND

OFOF

PERSONALITYPERSONALITY