united states v. fordice: mississippi higher education...

50
HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT PUBLIC HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES John Michael Lee, Jr., PhD Policy Director The College Board

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER

EDUCATION WITHOUT PUBLIC

HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND

UNIVERSITIES

John Michael Lee, Jr., PhD

Policy Director

The College Board

Page 2: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

THE COLLEGE BOARD

The College Board is a mission-driven organization

that connects students to college success and

opportunity. The organization promotes excellence

and equity in America’s educational system

through its programs and services in college

readiness and college success, and through

research and advocacy on behalf of students,

educators and schools.

Page 3: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

“IT WOULD BE IRONIC, TO SAY THE

LEAST, IF THE INSTITUTIONS THAT

SUSTAINED BLACKS DURING

SEGREGATION WERE THEMSELVES

DESTROYED IN AN EFFORT TO

COMBAT ITS VESTIGES” –JUSTICE

THOMAS, UNITED STATES V.

FORDICE, 1992

Page 4: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

BACKGROUND

There are currently 103 Historically Black Colleges

and Universities (51 private, 52 public) in nineteen

States, Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Virgin Islands

(IPEDS, 2011; Provasnik et al., 2004).

HBCUs are uniquely defined in federal law as

institutions of higher education that have the

intentional mission to educate African American and

these colleges must have been founded before 1964.

HBCUs should not be considered a monolithic set of

institutions because -like other institutional types-

they differ along several dimensions.

Page 5: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CHARACTERISTICS OF HBCUS

Page 6: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CHARACTERISTICS OF HBCUS

Non-HBCUs97%

HBCUs3%

Characteristics of U.S. Institutions by HBCU Status, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center

for Education Statistics, PEDS,

2011

Page 7: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CHARACTERISTICS OF HBCUS

Private49%

Public51%

Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Institutional Type, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 8: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CHARACTERISTICS OF HBCUS

2-Year11%

4-Year89%

Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Level of Institution, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center

for Education Statistics, PEDS,

2011

Page 9: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CHARACTERISTICS OF HBCUS

Public 2-Year10%

Public 4-Year40%

Private 2-Year1%

Private 4-Year49%

Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Type and Level of Institution, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 10: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

Page 11: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

Men153,064

39%

Women238,153

61%

Enrollment at Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Gender, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 12: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

American Indian9420%

Asian4,425

1%

African American302,666

82%

Hispanic12,205

3%

White50,803

14%

Enrollment at Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Race/Ethnicity, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center

for Education Statistics, PEDS,

2011

Page 13: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

56%

106%

33%

90%

55%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

American Indian Asian African American

Hispanic White

Enrollment Growth at Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Race/Ethnicity, 2000-2010

Series1

Page 14: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

Private85,816

22%

Public305,401

78%

Enrollment at Historically Black Colleges and Universities by Intuitional Type, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 15: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STUDENTS AT HBCUS

2-Year60,026

15%

4-Year331,191

85%

Enrollment at Historically Black Colleges and Universities By Level of Institution, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 16: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

HBCUS VS. NON-HBCUS

Page 17: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

HBCUS

VS.

NON-HBCUS

2010 Total

Enrollment at

HBCUs

2010 Total Enrollment

at All Degree Ganting

Institutions

Enrollment in HBCUs as a

percentage of enrollment

in all Degree Granting

Institutions (By individual

category)

Total 391,217 25,166,989 1.6%

Men 153,064 10,965,414 1.4%

Women 238,153 14,201,575 1.7%

American Indian 942 241,541 0.4%

Asian 4,425 1,501,872 0.3%

African American 302,666 3,116,020 9.7%

Hispanic 12,205 3,088,967 0.4%

White 50,803 14,275,323 0.4%

Private 85,816 4,773,951 1.8%

Public 305,401 20,393,038 1.5%

2-Year 60,026 10,967,550 0.5%

4-Year 331,191 14,199,439 2.3%

Public

2-Year 59,869 10,916,285 0.5%

4-Year 245,532 9,476,753 2.6%

Private

2-Year 157 51,265 0.3%

4-Year 85,659 4,722,686 1.8%

Note: Calculation by John Michael Lee, Jr.

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated

Postsecondary Education Data Systems (IPEDS), Spring 2011 Survey. (This table was

prepared in December 2011).

Fall Enrollment in Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Fall

Enrollment in all Degree Granting Institutions, by Sex and Race/Ethnicity of Student, and

Type and Control of Institution, 2010

Page 18: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

HBCUS VS. NON-HBCUS

2010 Total

Enrollment at

HBCUs

2010 Total Enrollment at All Degree

Granting Institutions

Enrollment in HBCUs as a

percentage of enrollment

in all Degree Granting

Institutions (By individual

category)

Total 302,666 3,116,020 9.7%

Men 115,626 1,160,258 10.0%

Women 187,040 1,955,762 9.6%

Private 77,767 520,827 14.9%

Public 224,899 2,595,193 8.7%

Note: Calculation by John Michael Lee, Jr.

Fall African American Enrollment in Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and African

American Enrollment Enrollment in All Degree Granting Institutions, by Sex of Student, and Control of

Institution, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary

Education Data Systems (IPEDS), Spring 2011 Survey. (This table was prepared in December 2011).

Page 19: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

ENROLLMENT GROWTH

Page 20: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

ENROLLMENT GROWTH AT HBCUS

10.1%

-1.2%

19.5%

7.2%

2.9%

10.2%

41.9% 41.5% 42.2%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2010

Enrollment growth in degree-granting historically

Black colleges and universities by decade, by sex

of student: 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010

Total Men Women

Page 21: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE OFFERINGS AT HBCUS

Page 22: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE OFFERINGS AT HBCUS

Graduate Offerings

60%

No Graduate Offerings

40%

Graduate Offerings at Historically Black Colleges

and Universities, 2010

Source: U.S.

Department of

Education, National

Center for Education

Statistics, PEDS,

2011

Page 23: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE OFFERINGS AT HBCUS

Associates Degree

Offered

11%

Bachelors Degree

Offered

34%

Doctoral and

Professional Degrees

Offered

12%

Doctoral Degree

Offered Only

12%

Masters Degree

Offered Only

27%

Professional Degree

Offered Only

4%

Highest Level of Degrees Offered at Historically

Black Colleges and Universities, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 24: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREES CONFERRED AT HBCUS

Page 25: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE CONFERRED AT HBCUS

Associate's Total

8%

Bachelor's Total

71%

Master's

16%

Doctoral

1%

Professional

4%

Degrees Awarded at Historically Black Colleges

and Universities, 2010

Source: U.S. Department of

Education, National Center for Education Statistics, PEDS, 2011

Page 26: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE CONFERRED AT HBCUS

35.0% 35.2%

28.5%

35.8%39.5%

65.0% 64.8%

71.5%

64.2%60.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Associate's Degrees

Bachelor's Degrees

Master's DegreesDoctoral Degrees Professional Degrees

Degrees Awarded by Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and All Degree Granting Institutions by Degree Type and Gender, 2010

Male Female

Page 27: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

DEGREE CONFERRED AT HBCUS

2.0%

19.8%

10.7%9.3%

17.3%

1.9%

19.9%

9.8%8.5%

17.7%

2.0%

19.7%

11.1%9.8%

17.1%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

Associate's Degrees

Bachelor's Degrees

Master's Degrees

Doctoral Degrees

Professional Degrees

Degrees Awarded to African Americans by Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and All Degree Granting Institutions by Degree Type, 2010

Total Male Female

Page 28: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION

WITHOUT HBCUS

Page 29: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CURRENT EVENTS: CLOSURE

Georgia (2008): Republican legislator, Seth Harp, suggested merging two HBCUs in the state with predominately white colleges in close proximity (Clark, 2008; Salzer & White, 2008)

Mississippi (2009): On November 16, 2009, Mississippi’s Governor, Haley Barbour, made a budget recommendation to the Mississippi State Legislature that the state’s three HBCUs-Mississippi Valley State University, Alcorn State University, and Jackson State University- all be merged into a single institution of higher learning.

Page 30: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CURRENT EVENTS: ACCREDITATION

HBCUs make up 13% of SACS of membership.

25% of SACS sanctions pertain to HBCUs

(1996-2011).

Since 1989, 50% of the institutions to lose

accreditation in SACS were HBCUs.

Page 31: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STATE OF EMERGENCY: ACCREDITATION

Table 1: Accreditation Decisions of HBCUs by SACS (1998-2001)

Year Placed on Warning/ Denied Approvals Placed on Probation Loss of Accreditation

1998 Savannah State University, GA

St. Paul’s College, VA

Hinds Community College, MS

1999 Morris Brown College, GA

Southwestern Christian College, TX

Tougaloo College, MS

LeMoyne-Owens College, TN

Stillman College, AL

2000 Huston-Tillotson College, TX

Voorhees College, SC

LeMoyne-Owens College, TN

Alabama State University, AL

Southwestern Christian College, TX

Tougaloo College, MS

Bennett College, NC

Talladega College, AL

2001 Grambling State University, LA

Alabama State University, AL

Southwestern Christian College, TX

Bennett College, NC

St. Augustine's College, NC

Barber-Scotia College, NC

Huston-Tillotson College, TX

Voorhees College, SC

Grambling State University, LA

Bennett College, NC

Morris Brown College, GA

Talladega College, AL

Page 32: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STATE OF EMERGENCY: ACCREDITATION

Table 2: Accreditation Decisions of HBCUs by SACS (2002-2007)

Year Placed on Warning/ Denied Approvals Placed on Probation Loss of Accreditation

2002 Alabama State University, AL

Interdenominational Theological Center,

GA

Huston-Tillotson College, TX

Grambling State University, LA

Bennett College, NC

Talladega College, AL

Morris Brown College, GA

2003 Barber-Scotia College, NC

LeMoyne-Owens College, TN

Interdenominational Theological

Center, GA

St. Augustine's College, NC

Texas College, TX

2004 LeMoyne-Owens College, TN Talladega College, AL

Texas College, TX

Barber-Scotia College, NC

Edward Waters College, FL

2005 Virginia Union University, VA Talladega College, AL

LeMoyne-Owens College, TN

2006 LeMoyne-Owens College, TN

2007 Coahoma Community College, MS

Dillard University, LA

Paul Quinn College, TX

Florida A&M University, FL

Texas Southern University, TX

Page 33: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

STATE OF EMERGENCY: ACCREDITATION

Table 2: Accreditation Decisions of HBCUs by SACS (2002-2007)

Year Placed on Warning/ Denied Approvals Placed on Probation Loss of Accreditation

2008 Dillard University, LA

Florida Memorial University

Paul Quinn College, TX

Florida A&M University, FL

Texas Southern University, TX

2009 Florida Memorial University, FL

Tougaloo College, MS

South Carolina State University, SC

Alabama A&M University Paul Quinn College, TX

2010 Stillman College, AL

Fisk University, TN

Tennessee State University, TN

Texas Southern University, TX

2011 Fisk University, TN

Southern University at Shreveport, LA

Fort Valley State University, GA

Savannah State University, GA

Stillman College, AL

Bennett College, NC

Tougaloo College, MS

Page 34: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION

WITHOUT HBCUS:

PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY

Page 35: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study raises the question of what would

American higher education be without public

HBCUs?

This study examines the impact of the closure,

merger, and mandated integration of HBCUs on

student access and selected student outcomes for

African Americans.

Page 36: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

METHODOLOGY

Uses 11 years of data from the IPEDS database, from 1995-2006 for Florida, Maryland, Mississippi and Tennessee

Time Series Statistical Models Used (Box-Jenkins Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Averages [ARIMA] models)

Variables First time in college (FTIC) enrollment,

total enrollment

Bachelor’s degrees

Master’s degrees

Doctoral Degrees

First Professional Degrees

Page 37: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CLOSURE/ MERGER MODEL

State System of Higher Education

(With HBCUs)

State Policy to Close Merge ALL HBCUS

Closure or Merger of all

HBCUs

Effects of Closure/Merger

on System Behavior and Performance

State System of Higher Education

without HBCUs

Page 38: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

MODEL ASSUMPTIONS

The models assume that: The results produce a statistical extension of how these

institutions currently behave in the state higher educational environment; this is a CRT assumption in the model.

Students are retained at the capacity expansion rate for the first year.

The state higher education system accommodates retained students by allowing for a capacity increase to allow students from merged/closed institutions to enroll; this percent increase is limited by space and resources available in the state system of higher education and will increase at the rate determined by estimated statistical model for that year.

While space is made for students from closed/merged institutions, these students will have to reapply into the system.

Page 39: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

MODEL ASSUMPTIONS (CONTINUED)

The models assume that:

African American students are admitted to the remaining

schools in the system at the rate determined by the

estimated statistical model for that year.

This means that the admit rate will grow at the constant

rate of the previous years as determined by estimated

statistical model.

This is a reasonable assumption because most schools

currently have a transfer process in the state system, and

many most schools have enrollment caps for entering

students.

Page 40: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

MODEL ASSUMPTIONS (CONTINUED)

The models assume that:

The closure/merger model assumes that once the institution is closed, institutional based aid and scholarships will not transfer with the student.

Though resources may be re-allocated to the other institutions of the state, these institutions will decide how to use these resources (Richardson & Smalling, 2005).

The 50% mandate model assumes that HBCUs reach a 50% non-black enrollment while retaining current enrollment levels, essentially changing the mix of students in HBCUs in a given state.

Page 41: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

LIMITATIONS

The econometric forecasts used by this study will only

be applicable to the state studied under the model.

Because each state of higher education is different, it

is not possible to make generalizations based on each

of the state model predictions.

The results of the study are contingent upon the

assumptions of the model, and any diversions from

these assumptions may cause the model to not

accurately predict the future access and outcome

variables for African American.

Page 42: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION

WITHOUT HBCUS:

RESULTS

Page 43: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

RESULTS:

TOTAL STUDENTS LOSS OVER 10-YEAR PERIOD

Florida Maryland Mississippi Tennessee Total

Total

African

American

Enrollment 117,590 193,537 153,708 73,455 538,290

First Time

In College

Enrollment 17,035 31,694 12,910 8,475 70,114

Page 44: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

RESULTS:

TOTAL DEGREES LOST OVER 10-YEAR PERIOD

Florida Maryland Mississippi Tennessee Total

Bachelor

Degrees 12,045 20,795 16,231 9,786 58,857

Master

Degrees 2,440 4,000 5,540 3,950 15,930

Doctoral

Degrees 185 575 445 140 1345

Professional

Degrees 1825 0 0 0 1825

Page 45: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that closure/ merger policy

models have an adverse effect on African

American student access and outcomes.

States consistently did not have the ability to

recover from the effects of the models.

There would be a decline in the number of

African American students who gain access to

higher education and obtain bachelor, master,

doctoral degrees.

Page 46: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Monitor the segregation indices of each school in

the system to monitor the extent to which all

schools in the system are able to provide

education to all ethnic/racial groups in the state.

Evaluate whether each institution in the state

higher educational system mirrors the ethnic and

racial makeup of the entire state.

Show the extent to which minority populations

view all schools as a real option for post-

secondary higher education.

Page 47: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED)

Evaluate the level to which HBCUs and PWIs provide

access to higher education for black and minority

students in the state higher educational system.

Assess the degree to which HBCUs and PWIs allow

African American and other minority students to

reach completion outcomes in the state higher

educational system.

Analyze the distribution of resources among all

institutions within the system to determine if

program attraction and school resources are

contributing to any inequities.

Page 48: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

HBCU STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS

Increase student enrollment, retention and

graduation

Recruit more minority students (Hispanics, Native

American and Asian)

Increase enrollment, retention and graduation of

African American Males

Diversify Financial Portfolio (Federal and State

Appropriations, Tuition (In-State/Out-of-State

mix),Research Grants, Endowment, Entrepreneurial

Efforts.

Page 49: United States v. Fordice: Mississippi Higher Education ...secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/rd/3-HBCU-3-101-Presentation...HBCU 101: AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION WITHOUT

QUESTIONS?