UnivCHE PITTS

Rober

Adviso

versiEVRON

SBURGH,

rt Mrosk

or: Dr. Ch

ty of N ANN

, PENNS

key | Con

himay Anu

 

PittsbNEX

SYLVANI

nstructio

umba

burgh

IA

on Optio

h SR A

2

on

Photo Co

Senior Report April 4

2012

ourtesy of Masser

Thesis

ry Photography

Final

EXECU

This final Annex prexpected

Analysis 1

The Chevsuggestedproductivcommissialso recodiscoverethe overa

Analysis 2

The instalthe Chevcompareddeterminhelped dwell as po

Analysis 3

The Chevequipmenprocess wnew scheareas wer

Analysis 4

The Chevincrease the stormbuilding. gained in

TIVE SUM

report discuroject. Backgd outcome an

1: Integration

vron Annex dd that the p

vity of the ioning, fill ou

ommended. ed that the imall cost and tim

2: Re-Design/

llation and pvron Annex. d to the orige the proble

determine theoint out any m

3: Commission

vron Annex nt for the teswas researchedule was crere analyzed a

4: Addition of

vron Annex’the efficiency

m water runo This analysi

n previous AE

MMARY

usses four anaground resead the steps th

of Tablet PC

did not utilizeroject team workers. T

ut punchlists These progr

mplementatiome savings fo

/Re-Sequence

hasing of the A re-seque

ginal plan in ems and challe most efficiemajor concer

ning of Labor

developed sting and ba

hed and analyeated and comand solutions

f a Green Roo

s roof was ay of the buildoff, the buildis also includ

E courses.

Arc

alyses that warch was perfhat were perf

’s in the Field

e any new oimplement d

Tablet PC’s and close ourams will helon of new anor the Chevro

e of the Facad

e exterior skiencing of ththis analysislenges facedent and effecrns or proble

ratory Spaces

some compalancing of thyzed to determpared to th

s were develo

f

a typical TPOding. This roding’s heat

des structural

chitectural En

will be performformed, as wformed to ach

d

r unique medifferent form are recommut the projectlp increase t

nd innovativeon Annex.

de

in caused a nhe installations. Members d during the ictive way to ms with the o

s

plications whhe systems. rmine the mohe original ploped to help

O roof that oof was changisland effectl and mechan

Universit

ngineering |

med for the Uwell as an exa

hieve the tec

ethods of techms of technomended to t. Applicatiothe overall p

e technology

number of prn of the faça of the projeinstallation osequence th

original sche

hen it came Throughout

ost efficient wlan, determin with this pro

did not use ged to a greet and the mnical breadth

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

University ofmination of t

chnical analy

hnology duriology in the

help controons and progrproductivity o in the field h

roblems duriade systems

ect team werof these systehe exterior fa

dule.

time to turt this analysi

way to commining the probocess.

any innovaten roofing sy

mechanical lohs that rely o

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 2

f Pittsburgh’she potential

ysis/research

ing construct field to incrol safety, corams applicaof the projechas a drastic

ing the consts was complre also intervems. This coaçade constru

n on the mis, the commission. Additblematic area

tive solutionystem, helpinoads imposen knowledge

on Annex t Mroskey

s Chevron solutions, .

tion. It is rease the oordinate able were ct. It was c effect on

ruction of leted and viewed to

omparison uction, as

echanical missioning tionally, a as. These

ns to help ng reduce ed on the e that was

ACKNO

OWLEDGEEMENTS

Arc

chitectural En

A

BU

Universit

ngineering |

ACADEMIC

Pen

Dr. Chim

URCHICK C

D

J

SP

U

My F

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

C ACKNOW

nn State AE F

ay Anumba

T.J. Kleinos

CONSTRUCT

INC.

Dave Meusc

Joe Scaramu

Amanda My

PECIAL THA

Jeff Stoude

Utkarsh Ghil

Family and

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 3

WLEDGEMEN

Faculty

a: CM Adviso

sky

TION COM

chke

uzzo

yers

HANKS

en

ldyal

Friends

on Annex t Mroskey

ENTS

or

MPANY,

TABLE

Executive

Acknowle

Project Ba

Project

Existin

Local C

Client I

Project

Staffing

Technical

Problem

Backgr

Case S

Benefit

Cost Ev

Applica

Summa

Technical

Problem

Backgr

Façade

Schedu

Summa

Technical

Problem

OF CONT

e Summary ...

edgements ...

ackground ...

t Information

g Conditions

Conditions ....

Information ..

t Delivery Sy

g Plan ...........

l Analysis 1 –

m Identificati

round Inform

tudies ..........

ts & Savings ..

valuation ......

ations ...........

ary ................

l Analysis 2 –

m Identificati

round Inform

e Sequencing

ule Evaluation

ary ................

l Analysis 3 –

m Identificati

TENTS

....................

....................

....................

...................

s ...................

....................

....................

stem ............

....................

– Integration

ion ..............

ation ...........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

– Re-Design/R

ion ..............

ation ...........

g ...................

n & Impleme

....................

– Commission

ion ..............Arc

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

of Technolog

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

Re-Sequence

....................

....................

....................

ntation .........

....................

ning of Labor

....................chitectural En

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

gy in the Field

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

e of the Façad

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ratory Spaces

....................

Universit

ngineering |

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

d .................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

de ................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

s ..................

....................

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 4

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

on Annex t Mroskey

............ 2

............ 3

............ 6

............ 6

............ 7

............ 8

............ 9

.......... 10

.......... 11

.......... 13

.......... 13

.......... 13

.......... 14

.......... 16

.......... 17

.......... 18

.......... 19

.......... 20

.......... 20

.......... 20

.......... 21

.......... 22

.......... 22

.......... 23

.......... 23

Schedu

Solutio

Summa

Technical

Problem

Backgr

Propos

Installa

Mainte

Structu

Mechan

Summa

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix

Reference

ule Evaluation

ns ................

ary ................

l Analysis 4 –

m Identificati

round Resear

sed Design ...

ation Procedu

nance ..........

ural Breadth ..

nical Breadth

ary ................

x A – Actual P

x B – Actual F

x C – Swing S

x D – New Fa

x E – New Co

x F – Actual C

x G – Propose

x H – Structur

es ................

n ..................

....................

....................

– Addition of

ion ..............

rch ...............

....................

ure ...............

....................

....................

h ..................

....................

Phasing Visua

Façade Sched

Scaffolding Lo

çade Schedu

ommissioning

Commissionin

ed Green Ro

ral Breadth H

....................

Arc

....................

....................

....................

a Green Roo

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

al .................

dule ..............

ocations .......

ule ................

g Schedule ...

ng Schedule .

of Layout ......

Hand Calculat

....................

chitectural En

....................

....................

....................

f ..................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

tions ............

....................

Universit

ngineering |

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 5

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

on Annex t Mroskey

.......... 23

.......... 25

.......... 26

.......... 27

.......... 27

.......... 27

.......... 28

.......... 29

.......... 30

.......... 31

.......... 34

.......... 37

.......... 38

.......... 54

.......... 57

.......... 62

.......... 66

.......... 69

.......... 75

.......... 77

.......... 98

PROJEC

PROJEC

The ChevThe constfacility isexisting afeet. TheBurchick for this th

Included level conare similaother roospace tha

The façadcotta, mewall and a

AdditionaGold buienvironmUniversity

The scheareas of tof the prowere dev

CT BACKG

CT INFORM

vron Annex itruction of ths a two phasauditorium, ae Chevron An Construction

hesis.

in the projecnsist of a maiar to each ot

oms are also at houses mos

de of the builetal panels, loan aluminum

ally, the Chevilding will h

mental and hy of Pittsburg

dule was thethe building oject was theveloped; how

GROUND

MATION

s an additione Annex starse project loas well as a tnnex was a $n was the Ge

ct are spacesn lobby, comther and are scattered thrst of the mech

lding is a comouvers and g

m cladded eye

vron Annex ielp acknowl

health perforgh’s campus.

e main conceonce the stud

e ongoing chwever, there

Arc

n to the Univerted on Novemocated in Pithree story ve

$25 million deneral Contra

s which encommputer lab, a devoted to croughout the hanical equip

mbination of glazing. Addebrow (Figur

is currently iledge the burmance, as

ern of this pdents returne

hanges that w was no addi

Figure 1 Al

chitectural En

ersity of Pittsmber 20, 200ttsburgh, Penertical additi

design-bid-buactor that was

mpass a numauditoriums achemistry lab floor. The fopment.

a number of ditionally, a sre 1) accents

in pursuit of auilding in itwell as add

project becaued to class. A

were requesteitional time a

uminum Cladde

Universit

ngineering |

sburgh’s Che09 and was connsylvania tion above thuild project ts awarded th

mber of functiand lounge abs and studeourth floor of

f systems. Sosunshade sys the southwes

a LEED Golds attempt to

ding another

use the UnivAnother areaed by the Unadded to the

ed Eyebrow

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

evron Tower ompleted in hat included

hat is approxithat was bid

his project, an

ions. The firsarea. The seent desk aref the new ad

ome of these stem is integst corner of th

d rating. Beino implement r LEED cert

ersity needea that was a riniversity. Coe schedule.

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 6

and Ashe auSeptember 2

d a renovatioimately 35,00 as a multi-pnd is also the

st floor and mecond and thas. A few ofdition is a m

systems inclgrated into thhe façade.

ng certified a strategies fified buildin

ed to turnoveisk for the co

onstant changOverall, the

on Annex t Mroskey

uditorium. 2011. The on to the 00 square

prime job. e sponsor

mezzanine hird floors ffices and echanical

lude terra he curtain

as a LEED for better ng to the

er certain ompletion ge orders Chevron

Annex haproblems2012 sem

EXISTIN

The projeUniversityaerial pho

The new accessiblmaterial s

ad several ps are expecte

mester.

NG CONDI

ect is locatedy of Pittsburgotograph bel

addition is ple from both storage and l

Figure

roblematic fed to be sol

TIONS

d in Oaklandgh’s main calow. The Che

laced on topthe Chevronlocating an on

e 2 Bird’s Eye Vi

Arc

features that ved through

d, Pennsylvanampus is locaevron Annex

the western n Tower and tn-site office.

iew of the Chevr

chitectural En

were previohout the analy

nia; which isated. The sit is outlined in

section of buthe Ashe Aud

ron Annex and a

Universit

ngineering |

ously identifiysis of four t

s large neighte and surroun RED.

uilding abovditorium. Th

adjacent structur

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ied in Techntechnical are

hborhood in unding build

ve the Ashe Ae compact si

res prior to cons

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 7

nical Report 3eas during th

Pittsburgh wdings are sho

Auditorium anite made it di

struction

on Annex t Mroskey

3. These he Spring

where the own in the

nd will be ifficult for

LOCAL

The Chevon a siteParkman

Due to thneed werand was lsmall traiContractoof the pro

Limited p

The follow

RED: Pro

BLUE: Fie

GREEN:

CONDITIO

vron Annex ise located in Avenue and

he fact that thre hard to colocated apprilers and oneor and the Ligoject.

parking was a

wing figure d

oject Site

eld Offices &

Lay-down/St

ONS

s located at 2the corner o

University D

he project siteome by. A siroximately a e larger doubghting Contra

available at th

displays the lo

& Limited Park

torage Areas

Arc

219 Parkman of The Univerive.

e was locateite office was quarter mile

ble-wide trailactor. The la

his site-office

ocations of th

king

s

Figure 3 Ove

chitectural En

Avenue in Oersity of Pitt

d in a denses needed for e west of the er. The two

arger double

e.

he site, office

erhead View of

Universit

ngineering |

Oakland, Penntsburgh’s ma

ely populatedr the multiple site. The sit smaller traile-wide trailer

e, and lay-dow

Project Area

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

nsylvania. Tain campus

d area, parkie primes invote office comers were occ was for the C

wn areas.

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 8

The building iat the inters

ing and otherolved with th

mplex consistcupied by theConstruction

on Annex t Mroskey

is located section of

r areas of he project ted of two e General Manager

CLIENT

The Univeowner of institutionareas rancompriseOakland, PennsylvaacademicThe mosLearning.in the wor

Enrollmeaccounts institutionOver 13,5

Although Departmeextremelyproducts.research heterocyc

In additioManagemDepartmeKlimchoc

INFORMA

ersity of Pittsf the project.n that is highnging from ped of five ca with the oania. The Oc, research ast notable o. This buildirld, at an asto

nt at the Univ for roughlyns of higher500 faculty an

The Universent is the my notable pro. The space interests ofclic chemistr

on to the Unment Department is the ma

ck as two main

ATION

sburgh, comm. The Univehly recogniz

philosophy toampuses. Thother campuOakland cam

and administrof all the bung is one of onishing 42-s

versity is moy five percenr education nd staff memb

sity of Pittsbmain tenant o

ofessor with me will be fittef the tenant y, combinato

niversity and ment is ano

ain representn representa

Arc

monly referreersity of Pittszed in a numo dentistry. he main camuses locatedmpus has ovrative buildiuildings is the tallest ac

stories and 53

re than 35,00nt of all studin the state bers assist an

burgh is the of the space.multiple awaed for the dinclude the

orial, medicin

their Chemiother party tative for the

atives for the

chitectural En

ed to as Pitt, burgh is a p

mber of acad The Univers

mpus is locat around wever one hunngs located the Cathedr

cademic buil35 feet tall.

00 students, wdents enrolle of Pennsylvnd support th

outright own. The depa

ards and pubdepartment’s total synthenal and comp

istry Departminvolved in

e University adepartment.

Universit

ngineering |

is the public demic sity is ted in estern ndred on it.

ral of ldings

which ed in vania. he needs of th

ner of the prartment is lelications invo synthetic chesis of naturputational che

ment, The Un the projeand is led by

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

he University

roject, the Ued by Dr. Polved with thhemistry resral productsemistry.

University of ct. The Fa

y Chris Niem

rgh – ChevroRobert

2 | 9

y.

University’s Ceter Wipf, w

he chemistry search progr, organomet

Pittsburgh’s acilities Man

mann along w

on Annex t Mroskey

Chemistry who is an of natural

ram. The tallic and

Facilities nagement

with David

Fig

PROJEC

The UnivChevron competitiprimes aUniversityheld a cobelow.

General Burchick

CM Mascaro Co

Roofing String

Glazing Southwest

G

gure 4 Project D

CT DELIVER

ersity of PittAnnex proje

ively bid andnd their suby chose to hi

ost plus a fee

ContractorConstruction

Agentonstruction, Co.

Contractorgert, Inc.

Contractort Aluminum &

Glass

Other S

Delivery Method

RY SYSTEM

sburgh usedect. The Univd was each a

bcontractors ire a CM Ag contract wit

Subs

d

Arch

M

d a Design-Biversity brokeawarded as awere also lu

gent. Mascarth the owner

OwUnivers

hitectural Eng

id-Build withe the projecta lump sum cump sum conro Constructi. The organiz

wnerity of Pitt

C

Lu

Universit

gineering | A

h CM Agencyt into eight bcontract. Contracts. Dueion was the Czational char

Cont

Cost Plus Fe

ump Sum

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

y project debid packagesontracts helde to the projCM Agent thrt for the Che

PlumbContraSSM Ind

Fire SuppContra

Alliance Fire

HVAC ConSSM Ind

ElectrContra

Lighthouse

ArchiWilson Ar

tract Type

ee

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 10

livery methos. Each pack

d between eaject’s comple

hat Pitt hired evron Annex

bing actor

dustries

pression actor

e Protection

ntractordustries

rical actore Electric

itectrchitects

es

on Annex t Mroskey

od for the kage was

ach of the exity, the and they

x is shown

STAFFIN

Burchick job was c

Typicallydoes thisproject. project mKonesky,Burchick’informatio

On-site, Kalso in chvarious trkeep in tobe compAnnex.

NG PLAN

organized thcomplex, Burc

y, for most ofs by staying

For the Chemanager. Da kept him u’s chief estimon that perta

Keith Koneskharge of fourradesmen thouch with Daleted. The d

heir staff for tchick assigne

f Burchick’s p in constant

evron Annex,ave spent mupdated on mator, Joe Scined to the b

ky is in chargr foremen thaat Burchick eave and Keithdiagram belo

Arch

this project sed more fore

projects, Joe contact with

, Burchick asmost of his ti

the daily tascaramuzzo, fidding of the

ge of coordinat help him kemploys. Both to keep traow outlines

hitectural Eng

similar to moeman than usu

Burchick ovh the projectssigned Daveme in the osks that werfor any quese project.

nating all of keep track ofth, Burchick’

ack of any acthe staffing p

Universit

gineering | A

ost of their otual to this pro

verlooks the t manager the Meuschke

office; while re being pestions regard

the contractof the daily ac’s accountantccounting or plan that Bur

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ther projectsoject.

entire procehat is assign to take on tthe on-site s

erformed. Dding change

ors involvedctivities that t and admini administrativrchick optim

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 11

s. However,

ess of the proned to the rethe responsibsuperintende

Dave also re order costs

d in the projeare performeistrative assive duties tha

mized for the

on Annex t Mroskey

since this

oject. He espective bilities of ent, Keith

eferred to s and any

ect. He is ed by the stant also

at need to Chevron

ForeJohn W

AHea

Figure 5 B

emanWalker

ccountingather Sabala

Bu

Burchick Staffing

ForemBill Mro

urchic

g Plan

Arch

PresidJoe Bur

Project MDave Meu

SuperinteKeith Kon

manoskey

ck Sta

hitectural Eng

dentrchick

Manageruschke

endentnesky

ForemRay Bow

affing

Universit

gineering | A

manwser

Ad

A

g Plan

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ChJo

ForemaBob Mros

dministrativAssistant

Amanda Myer

n

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 12

hief Estimatoe Scaramuzz

anskey

ve

rs

on Annex t Mroskey

orzo

TECHN

PROBLE

The Chevwas a cowhich maconsiderahave beealso a lacof new an

Due to thidea thatsuggestio

B C Be C A Su

BACKGR

As technopressure Upon comBurchick implemen

This poindescribe Take Off briefly foTablets pinspectiophones ato leap fo

In order analyzed

NICAL ANA

EM IDENTI

vron Annex dncern during

ade it difficultable amount

en utilized beck of communnd innovative

he potential bt should be on, a detailed

ackground InCase Studies

enefits & SavCost EvaluatioApplications

ummary

ROUND IN

ology is bec of integratinmpletion, it Constructionting technol

nt can be rei the populariin Construct

ocuses on twoprovided thesns, arrange lnd laptops; srward.

to gain a be. The first

ALYSIS 1 –

FICATION

did not utilizeg the projectt for the supe of time that etter, thus incnication amone technology

benefits that aaddressed o

d study was p

nformation

vings on

NFORMATIO

oming more ng new techno

was determon and the logy in the fie

inforced by rity and effection describeo companiesse users newlogistics andsome believe

etter undersreference u

Arch

– INTEGRA

N

e any new ort because th

erintendents was wasted creasing the ngst the projein the field.

are possible on this proj

performed. T

ON

popular in tologies; and

mined that thother contr

eld.

reviewing antiveness of taes the recent and how the

w ways to spd manage. Ae that they m

tanding of thsed for this

hitectural Eng

ATION OF

r unique methe field office

to keep trackwalking betw quality contect team, wh

with the impect. To pro

This study inc

the construct whether or ne Chevron Aactors to ge

n article fromablet PCs in t attractiveneey each use eed up comm

Although, it ismay be one of

he technolog analysis wa

Universit

gineering | A

F TECHNO

thods of teche was locatek of their docween the sitetrol and supehich could be

plementationoperly detercludes the fol

tion industrynot it is goingAnnex wouldet their foo

m Engineerin the construcess iPads havthe tablet tomunication, s believed thf the enablin

gy currently as a book ti

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

OLOGY IN

hnology duried a quarter cuments. Ade and field oervision of the resolved wi

n of technologrmine if thisllowing:

y, each compg to significad have been

ot in the tec

ng News-Recction industryve been rec

o maximize thobtain client

hat tablet PCng devices th

available, aitled Applica

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 13

N THE FIE

ing constructmile west ofditionally, thffice. This ti

he project. Tith the implem

gy in the fiels idea is an

pany is facedntly affect then a great prchnological

cord (ENR) ty. The articleiving in theheir companyt approvals, s will not rep

hat allows the

a few resouration of Mob

on Annex t Mroskey

LD

tion. This f the site;

here was a ime could There was mentation

ld, it is an effective

d with the e project. roject for door by

that helps le Tablets e field. It y’s goals. complete place cell e industry

rces were bile IT in

Constructin the cobenefits aThroughothe contrreduce th

CASE ST

In order projects wcan be deseemed tSystems isummariz

Case St

The first companyBalfour Be(ROI) of

tion (Bowdennstruction inand drawbac

out this bookibuting facto

he conflicting

TUDIES

to adequatewhere the iteetermined thto be one of included muzed below.

tudy 1

case study ty-wide, phaseeatty decidedthe software

n, 2005). Thisndustry. Addcks associate, Bowden tou

ors (Figure 6g information

ely evaluate em of interesrough a varie the most wi

ultiple case s

hat was revied use of Veld to pilot Vel

e. It was fou

InsuffInappror Con

Inform65

Fig

Arch

s book providitionally, thed with eachuches on the ). From this throughout a

a piece of est was used. ety of case stidely used pstudies on th

iewed dealt wla Systems sola’s field manund that the

ficient, ropriate nflicting mation5%

gure 6 Contribut

hitectural Eng

des a full anais book usesh of the differecurring pr

s figure, it isa jobsite.

equipment o The problemtudies. While

programs in their website

with Balfour oftware and inagement sofre was a re

Weath8%

ting Factors to C

Universit

gineering | A

alysis of the us helpful taberent forms roblems assos obvious tha

or software, ims and solutie researchinthe industry.addressing t

Beatty ConsiPads for onsftware and dduction of g

her

Human E17%

Contractor Rewo

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

use and applbles that give

of technologociated with cat something

it is essentiaions develop

ng various pro. After furththe use of th

struction decsite project mdetermine thegeneral cond

Error%

MaF

PoWorkm

5%

ork

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 14

ications of tee a breakdowgy that are pcontractor re

g needs to be

al to review ped by the teograms, Velaer investigat

heir products

ciding to impmanagement.e return on inditions and o

aterials Failure

5%

oor manship%

on Annex t Mroskey

echnology wn of the

proposed. ework and e done to

previous echnology a Systems tion, Vela s and are

plement a Initially,

nvestment overhead,

resulting was due t

Using iPaease-of-uwith Otterjobsite.

The consSystems. issue crefeatures a

This casewill not b

Case St

The seconto increaMassachucommuniof time itparticipatless focus

After resecombinatfeatures wlightweig

After impdevelopinfound andoutput, re

Overall, iin the foll

Pe Pr R C

in a ROI of mto the real-tim

ads to supporuse of iPads mrbox Defend

struction indu This app inc

eation/sign oare available

study also ge covered. F

tudy 2

nd case studyase their efficusetts. This ication from tt took to capting parties; s on the pape

earching multion of handwwere describ

ght design an

plementationng meeting md the superineports and do

it was determlowing areas

ersonnel Proroject Acceleisk Reduction

Cost of Quality

more than 300me access to

rt the Vela Mmake them ander Series cas

ustry’s first cludes a docuoff for trackin with or witho

goes into detaFor more info

y that was anciency. Suff project wasthe field backpture field n co-founder

erwork and m

ltiple tablet Pwriting and thbed, with the nd affordable

n, the end rminutes in hantendent wasocuments are

mined that co (Vela System

oductivity eration n y

Arch

0%. An increthe quality an

Mobile systemn essential elses also make

“all in one”ument libraryng any issueout an Intern

ail on cloud cormation, ple

nalyzed focusfolk Construcs a luxuriousk to the archnotes on-siteand construc

more focus on

PCs, Vela chhe ability to m main focus b price.

esult was thalf. Additionas able to repe also superio

ompanies usims, 2012):

hitectural Eng

ease in efficiend safety asp

m was also slement for coes the tablets

iPad constry, checklists es while walet connection

computing anease visit Vela

es on the usection was his hotel that itects and de, type the dction manag

n the actual p

ose Motion Cmark up planbeing placed

hat Suffolk’s ally, during aort the problor to the ones

ing Vela con

Universit

gineering | A

ency and redpects of their

uggested. Tonstruction ms able to with

ruction appl for QA/QC, lking in the n.

nd BIM, whica Systems’ w

e of Vela Softired to constrequired ve

esigners. Aftdata at the oger, Adam Omproject.

Computing slns with a pen.d on the blen

superintenda project wallem in real tis Suffolk was

nfigured Moti

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

duced risk wa performance

The low cost,management.hstand the ro

ication is als Safety and C field. Inter

ch are not an website: www

tware on a Sutruct the Libery detailed ter being frusoffice and thmansky, felt

late tablet PC. Several of M

nd of its perfo

dent was abllk through, seime. The qu using before

ion tablets se

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 15

as also evidee.

, long battery. Protecting

ough conditio

so providedCommissioninrestingly, all

area of this sw.velasystems

uffolk Construberty Hotel i and time-costrated by then distribute that there s

Cs to help suMotion tabletormance, rug

le to cut hiseveral probleuality of the ee.

ee exponenti

on Annex t Mroskey

ent, which

y life and the iPads ons on the

d by Vela ng and an l of these

study and s.com .

uction job n Boston, onsuming

he amount e it to all should be

upport the t’s unique

ggedness,

s time of ems were electronic

ial results

Case St

A third cmulti-faceemploy VCommisstested. Aspecific commissi

With the relativelythe screeautomaticusing Velassist in th

An exampinstance, window. image. Acolumn li

Overall, tvariety oinvolved.

BENEFI

After revidiscoverepaper-bausing tecinformatiothe accur

For examalter theirdirectly ininformatio

Reducingsuperinteforeman uthat the sadds up t

tudy 3

ase study reeted construVela Systemssioning trackA handover d

equipment. ioning proce

use of Velay obsolete. Fen in their ocally convertla Systems. he overall or

ple of how e if a few wind The photo co

Also, it could nes were.

this case studof tasks that

TS & SAVIN

iewing case sed that the uased documehnology in thon between t

racy of the inf

mple, many sur accuracy. Into the systemon, while cre

g the numberendent makeusually makesuperintendeo three hours

eviewed on Vction compas’ commissios systems anocument set This set iss (Vela Syst

a Systems’ mField personnwn handwrit

ts to electron Using a Tabrientation with

easy it is to rdows were nould then bebe indicated

dy reinforces can be perf

NGS

studies on thuse of technontation. Deche field. Thithe field and formation.

uperintendenInstead of wam while obse

eating a more

r of trips betes an averages at least twoent spends ans and fifty mi

Arch

Vela Systemsany, expandinoning modulnd equipmen is also creates then delivems, 2012).

mobile field nel can use ating; which tnic text. Comblet PC to viehin the field.

report problenot operating e downloadedd directly on t

the importanformed using

he applicationology in the creasing the is is accompl office. Getti

nts wait until aiting until theerving the woe efficient inte

tween the sitge of five trio, with each n additional inutes a day t

hitectural Eng

s’ website inng their usele on Harvarnt as they areed by electrovered to the

software, tha Tablet PC tothe tablet dimmunicationew drawings

ems in the fie properly du

d into the systhe plans whi

nce of using tg Vela Syste

ns of mobile field will elimpossibility olished by reding the inform

the end of the end of the dork being peernal history

te and field oips per day trip taking athree hours

the superinte

Universit

gineering | A

nvolves Bonde of Vela Sysrd Universitye delivered, onically tyinge owner, sp

he paper sido view drawiisplays as pe

n of punchlists, instead of

eld was alsouring inspectstem and noteich window d

technology inems software

technology iminate manyf human erroducing the pmation direct

he day to recday, superin

erformed. Th for the estim

office can sa between th

approximatel a day in theendent is not

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

d Brothers, a stems. Bondy’s Northwes installed, reg all relevantpeeding up

de of the coings, as well en strokes, ht items werea bunch of 1

o provided intion; a photo es could be wdoes not wor

n the field. Ae and the tim

in the construy of the probor is an adva

paper-trail invtly from the f

cord their wontendents canhis can increamating depart

ave a lot of the site and fly ten minutee trailer, awa on-site supe

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 16

Massachused Brothers dest Lab proje

eadied for tet documentat the deliver

onstruction p as writing dhighlighter m

e also improv11 x 17 draw

n this case st could be takwritten direc

rk and show w

Also, it showsme and cost

uction industblems associantage associvolved in trafield can also

ork reports; wn enter the infase the accurtment.

ime and monfield office, wes. It is also eay from the srvising. Like

on Annex t Mroskey

etts-based ecided to

ect. Vela sting and tion to the ry of the

process is irectly on marks, or ved while

wings, can

tudy. For ken of the ctly on the where the

s the wide s savings

try, it was iated with iated with ansferring o increase

which can formation acy of the

ney. The while the estimated site. This ewise, the

foremen spend at workers.

Without approximproject mminimize

COST E

When anasignificanassociateprovidedto note ththe misce

Sup

A

Proj

AdditionaAnnex, a determinOtterBox on the job

The mainSystems sassociate$11,064. project. T$1,500 to Annex are

spend an hothe field offic This can inc

technology, mately an houmanager spen

d if the field

EVALUATIO

alyzing the cnt advantaged with the la

d by Burchickhat the superellaneous com

Worker

perintendent

Foreman

Accountant

ject Manage

ally, in order short evaluaed that the c protective cbsite.

n costs assocsoftware. Ved with purch This includeThe training help train the shown belo

our a day awce increases crease worke

time is alsur a day transnds an hour areports and q

ON

costs incurrede is found. ack of technok Constructionintendent an

mpany and un

t $

$

$

er $

r to assess thation of the pcost of an iPaase would co

ciated with imela’s softwarehasing Vela fes the use of associated whe end usersow (Table 2).

Table

Arch

way from thethe amount or productivit

so wasted wsferring the wa day confirmquantities of

d and potentTo support logy in the fin, while the d

nd foreman ranion burden

Rate

54.03

48.80

25.00

50.00

he costs involproposed tecad with a waost $70 each

mplementinge prices are bfor a project f the softwar

with learning. The total c

e 1 Costs Associ

hitectural Eng

e site. By deof time they ay, as well as

within the cwork reportsming invoicematerials are

tial savings athis informa

ield can be fodurations weates have a m costs.

Unit Hour

$/hr 3

$/hr 1

$/hr 1

$/hr 1

lved with addchnologies warranty and cand would h

g technology based on the

$10 to $29 mre, as well as this software

costs associat

iated without Te

Universit

gineering | A

ecreasing thare available increasing th

company’s s from a faxees and materie recorded d

associated wiation, a comfound below re observed

multiplier of

rs/Day Pr

D

3.83 4

1.00 4

1.00 4

1.00 4

ding a new fwas performecamera will c

help protect t

on the Chev individual prmillion and a s online suppe costs $1,00ted with usin

echnology in the

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

e amount of to supervisehe overall qu

office. Theed copy to theial quantities

directly on sit

ith using techmplete analys

(Table 1). T while on-site1.6 applied t

roject Days

ToHo

486 1,86

486 486

486 486

486 486

3,32

form of techned. From Apcost roughlythe iPad from

vron Annex roject size an duration of port for the

00 for the set ng iPads and

e Field

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 17

f time the sue the project auality of the p

e accountane computer, s. These timete.

hnology in thsis of the labThese unit prie. Also, it is ito them to ac

otal ours

Tot

63.00 $ 10

6.00 $ 2

6.00 $ 1

6.00 $ 2

21.00 $ 16

nology to thepple’s websi

y $937 each. m the rough c

consisted ofnd duration. 24 months wentire durati up; and an a Vela for the

on Annex t Mroskey

upervisors and assist

project.

nt spends while the es can be

he field, a bor costs ices were important ccount for

tal Cost

00,661.62

23,716.80

12,150.00

24,300.00

60,828.42

e Chevron ite, it was Also, an conditions

f the Vela The costs

would cost ion of the additional

e Chevron

T

iPad w

Comparin$144,243.Annex wo

APPLIC

There wetechnologthe amouamount oincreasin

Another pthe extenManager punchlist of the copunchlistpunchlist

Safety waconcerns using a s

echnology

w/ warrantyOtterBox CVela SystVela Train

Total

ng the costs .42 was founould have be

ATIONS

ere a lot of gy in the fielunt of time theof time eachg the overall

problem that nsive amount was the lack were still inc

ontractors dis on the Chs would have

as also a hug were repeat

safety inspec

y Type

y & camerCase ems ning

l

without techd (Table 3). en a good jo

Poten

Cos

opportunitied. To begine superinten

h supervisor l quality of th

could have bt of time it tk of communcomplete sixid not know hevron Annee been compl

ge concern otedly brough

ction software

Arch

C

ra $ $ $ 1 $ 2

hnology to the This is an ob to use tech

ntial Savings

ts without T

Technology

Potential Sa

es that the Cn, the overal

ndents and fo spends at e project.

been prevenook to comp

nication durinx months afte what items ex, the comleted in an ap

on the projecht up in meete, provided

Table 2 Estima

Table

hitectural Eng

Cost

937.00 70.00 1,064.00 2,500.00

e costs of imobvious advahnology in the

s Associated in the Field

echnology

y Costs

avings

Chevron Anll quality of th

oremen were the job wou

nted with the plete the punng the first pr the phase w were still o

mmunication ppropriate am

ct and coulding, but wereby Vela, the

ated Technology

e 3 Potential Sav

Universit

gineering | A

Qua

3 3 1 1

mplementing antage and sue field.

d with Techn

$ 160,8

$ 16,58

$ 144,2

nnex would he project w away from t

uld increase

use of technonchlists. A mphase’s puncwas completeopen. By us

delays woumount of time

d have utilizee slowly resoe amount of

y Costs

vings

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

antity

.00 $

.00 $

.00 $

.00 $

$

technology, upports the i

nology

28.42

85.00

43.42

have benefiwould have inthe project si worker pro

ology in the fmain concer

chlist. Items ed. This wassing technol

uld have bee.

ed technologolved by the risk on the

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 18

Total Cos

$ 2,811.0$ 210.0$ 11,064.0$ 2,500.0$ 16,585.

a potential sidea that the

itted from thncreased by ite. By increoductivity, as

field would hrn of the Con

from the firss partly becalogy to comen reduced

gy in the field offending pajob could ha

on Annex t Mroskey

st

00 00 00 00 00

savings of Chevron

he use of reducing

easing the s well as

have been nstruction st phase’s use many

mplete the and the

d. Safety arties. By ave been

reduced. more effic

The commhelp of teequipmenstatus. Alowner in the multip

SUMMA

It is recomsoftware foremen, shoulder

In order tprogram will inclutechnologprogram,future pro

Also, the macient manner

missioning prechnology. nt, enabling lso, the comm an electroniple documen

ARY

mmended thincludes Ve should be g strap, which

to reduce the by Vela’s Seude web-basgy. This wil, as well as hojects.

ain safety cor.

rocess for theReports are the commiss

missioning inic form. This

nts related to

hat Burchick Cela Web, Vegiven an iPa will increase

e difficulty relervice and Sused group sll benefit evehelp them in

Arch

ncerns of the

e Chevron An completed sioning agennformation ans reduces the the commiss

Constructionla Mobile an

ad. Each iPae the durabili

lated to the leupport Teamsessions targeryone withithe long run

hitectural Eng

e project team

nnex would hby the softw

nts and other nd linked doce time wastesioning proce

n purchase Vnd Vela Repad will incluity and mobil

earning curvm will be heldgeted to helpin the compa

n by saving th

Universit

gineering | A

m could have

have also beeware, showinr responsiblecuments can

ed by variousess.

Vela Systems ports. Also, ude an Otterlity of the iPa

ves associated at Burchickp the end uany and willhe company

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

e been recor

en a more smng the statusee parties to b be created as parties coll

software for each superbox Defende

ad.

d with the nek’s office. Thusers learn l enable Bur a significant

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 19

ded and reso

mooth proceses of all sys

better managand turned ovlecting and c

r future projeintendent, aner Series ca

ew software, hese trainingthe various

rchick to leat amount of m

on Annex t Mroskey

olved in a

ss with the tems and

ge project ver to the

compiling

ects. This nd select se with a

a training g sessions forms of arn Vela’s money on

TECHN

PROBLE

The instaChevron difficultieaddition, installatio

Phasing scaffoldinrelated tonumber o

Additionaconsumedstructuralpushing b

Re-sequethe façadthe follow

B Fa Sc Su

BACKGR

To effectperformeproject pmanager,

• Thte

• E(p

• Th

NICAL ANA

EM IDENTI

allation of thAnnex. Be

es were enco the interdepon.

and sequenng systems wo space and of scope mee

ally, construcd much of thl studs, and back the start

encing the façde systems. Twing:

ackground Inaçade Sequechedule Evalummary

ROUND IN

tively analyzed was doneprogress pho, a number of

his was Burcerra cotta nsuring that panels, clips,here was a la

ALYSIS 2 –

FICATION

he exterior facause the roountered whpendencies

cing of the were used tostaging. Co

etings and pla

cting the arche schedulethe finishingt dates for the

çade will helTo properly s

nformation encing luation & Imp

NFORMATIO

ze the probl. This analyotos and stuf difficulties a

hick’s first at

the order wa rails, gasket

ack of flow ar

Arch

– RE-DESI

N

acade causeoofing and chen figuring of each of t

façade waso install the

ountless moveanning sessio

chitectural e and manpo

g and waterpe façade syst

lp decrease support this i

plementation

ON

lems associaysis consisteddying the oand obstacles

ttempt at a la

as placed prots, tile pieces

round the bui

hitectural Eng

GN/RE-SE

ed a numbercurtainwall c out which ithe façade s

s another prdifferent faç

es of the scaons.

yebrow locaower. This fproofing of ttems.

the confusioidea, a detai

ated with thd of multipleriginal sches were broug

arge metal pa

operly with as/sizes, flashiilding with th

Universit

gineering | A

EQUENCE

r of problemcontractors witems were

systems crea

roblem encoçade systemaffolding swin

ated on the feature was this item hel

on and congeiled study wa

he façade, ae interviews dule. Withi

ght up. These

anel project

dequate quaing)

he different sy

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

E OF THE F

ms during thwere separatowned by w

ated confusio

ountered. Ams, which cre

ngs were ma

southwest cobuilt and at

ld up other t

estion relatedas performed

a complete a with the proin the interve challenges

and their firs

antities of the

ystems

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 20

FAÇADE

he constructiote prime cowhich contraon and issue

A limited nueated some pade due to th

orner of thettached on-sitrades on th

d to the instad. This study

analysis of oject team, rview with ths were:

st attempt at

different com

on Annex t Mroskey

on of the ntractors, actor. In es during

umber of problems

he limited

building ite out of

he façade,

allation of y includes

the work reviewing e project

installing

mponents

• Th

• Hco

• Po

In order tof the actConstructphotos wactual phwith each

Before thobtained.The exterwith two mto fifty feetwo men complete

FAÇADE

The first (Appendiefficiencysequencinthe east eelevation

Once all owere anastudied aneeded tdifferent the variopanels ha

After all estimatedon the Chto create

o The swineffic

he eyebrow o Cause

aboveHaving a sep

omplicated moor definition

to make suggual phasing ption, the gen

were receivedhasing of the h month show

e new phasin. The first pirior phasing motors. Twoet. These staeach, assigne

e the exterior

E SEQUEN

step in devix C). This y of the extng was also elevation and

ns are the foca

of the swing alyzed. By uat each swingto be compleswing dropsus corners a

ad to be coor

of the activd from persohevron Annex a critical pat

wing scaffoldcient also caused a

ed problems e and below tparate curtaimatters ns of scope in

gestions on hprocess needneral contracd, they were exterior (Ap

wing what eac

ng of the façaiece of inform for the Chev

o of these stagages can be ded to the faça façade of the

NCING

eloping the minimizes terior sequebeing decided finish on thal point of the

drops were dtilizing the id

g location. Tete to finish throughout t

and transitiondinated. Thi

vities were donal experienx. The schedh. The final

Arch

ding was con

a number of p associated whe eyebrow inwall contra

n the docume

how to improvded to be resctor, and aski reviewed an

ppendices A ch elevation l

ade could bemation needevron Annex ges have a m

downsized acade of the bue building.

new façade the number

encing. Whed. It was dhe north. The building an

determined, dea of the laThe multiple the respectthe façade, kns of the sysis caused eac

determined, nce that was dule was then façade seque

hitectural Eng

nstantly bein

problems with the swin actor who w

ents

ve the installasearched. Thing for progrnd organized& B). The re

looked like a

e developed,ed related toconsists of th

maximum lenccordingly. Auilding. Thes

sequence w of moves fhile the swinetermined thhe reasoningnd was a main

the activitiesast planner, t

systems werive area we

keeping in mstems. Eachch side of the

their duratiogained while

n finalized byencing sched

Universit

gineering | A

ng relocated

ng staging fo

was not unde

ation of the ehis research fress photos d to developeference bre

at the beginni

, a few key po the scaffoldhree swing s

ngth of forty feAdditionally,se crews will

was to deterfor each swing locations

hat the installg behind thisn concern of

s that neededthe last swingre analyzed are determin

mind the multih corner thate system to be

ons were cae observing

y linking the ndule can be f

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

d and reset,

r the exterio

er Burchick’

exterior façadfirst began bof the entire

p a visual aideaks down thing of the mo

pieces of infoding that wasscaffolding stfeet and the t there will be perform all

rmine the locing, while ins were beinlation of the s was becau the Universit

d to be perfog drop was tand all the ded. This waiple coordinat consisted oe installed sim

alculated. T the actual wnecessary acfound in Appe

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 21

which was e

or façade acc

’s contractua

de, a compleby contactinge project. Ond and scheduhe project byonth.

rmation needs available atages, each ethird stage cae a total of fothe work nec

cations of thncreasing thng determinfaçade woulse the south ty.

ormed at eachthe first area

different activas done for ation issues r

of terra cottamultaneously

These duratiowork being pctivities to onendix D.

on Annex t Mroskey

extremely

cess, both

al control

ete review g Burchick nce these ule of the y months,

ded to be at the site. equipped an extend

our crews, cessary to

he swings he overall ned, their d start on and east

h location a that was vities that all of the related to

a of metal y.

ons were performed ne another

SCHEDU

Once the Construct

Key Differ

Th E Th

When woin extremdeterminsystems. constructsmoothly

SUMMA

After thorhave bee

Pb

T S

K S T

ULE EVALU

new phasingtion. Main di

rences:

he estimatedyebrow tookhere was no

o There o Swing

orking on a pme detail. Aed. This wi Efficient plaing these sys around the p

ARY

roughly analn made:

Proper plannbuilding’s sysThorough defSeparate prim

o Multipproje

o Get alKnowing howStarting from Take advanta

UATION &

g plan was esifferences be

d durations dik up an unexpinitial plan th was no flow

g scaffolding w

roject that haAdditionally, ll help reducanning will astems. Creaperimeter of

lyzing the fa

ning is an estem finitions of th

me contractorple coordinact ll parties invo

w a system wo the end and

age of the on-

Arch

IMPLEMEN

stablished, itetween the tw

iffered from tpected amounhat maximize maintained awas moved b

as complex fa the scopes ce confusionalso ensure tating a phasinthe building

açade system

essential step

e scope of wrs on a projecation and sco

olved in creaorks and is in backtracking-site knowled

hitectural Eng

NTATION

t was comparwo schedules

the actual dunt of time d the efficien

around the bubefore the res

acade systemof work eac

n related to tto the most eng plan that was essentia

ms used on th

p in determ

ork in the doct add additioope review

ating a schednstalled shoulg can prove t

dge to determ

Universit

gineering | A

red to the acs were discov

urations of the

ncy of the swuilding spective area

ms, it is impoch contractothe interdepefficient and allowed the al in this analy

he Chevron

mining the m

ocuments is imonal coordinmeetings ne

dule ld be known to be an effec

mine activity

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

tual schedulevered and are

e activities be

wing scaffolds

a’s work was

ortant to examor is responspendencies o practical wa constructionysis.

Annex, the

most efficient

mportant nation concereed to be h

before beginctive practicedurations

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 22

e created bye listed below

eing perform

s

s completed

mine all of thesible for neeof the multipay of sequenn of the façad

following co

t way to co

rns to the proeld on a mu

nning the woe in schedulin

on Annex t Mroskey

y Burchick w:

med

e systems eds to be le façade

ncing and de to flow

onclusions

onstruct a

oject ulti-prime

ork ng

TECHN

PROBLE

LaboratorChevron for the tecompleteitems thatdate, resunegative job more

In additiouncoverewas contrunder conby the cosubmittaldue to theby Jeff wa

Within thThis new comparispossible performe

SCHEDU

The issuecircumstarelating tothe criticasubstantiato start. Tup.

Once thecommissi

NICAL ANA

EM IDENTI

ry spaces haAnnex deveesting and b

ely dust free t needed to bulting in scheair condition difficult with

on to the aboed some morracted directnstruction. Aommissionings and RFI’s we difference as that it was

his analysis, a schedule wi

son, the key solutions will

ed to help imp

ULE EVALU

es discussedances. Withio the commisal steps and al completionThis schedul

e activities wioning sched

ALYSIS 3 –

FICATION

ave extreme loped some balancing ofbefore any o

be installed tedule compl

n; which tendh cleanliness.

ove complicre problems.tly with the oAnother issueg agent. It wwere not theof viewpointoften difficul

a new commill be compaareas of discl be proposeprove the ove

UATION

d above are n this analysssioning of th their activitin date, detere includes al

were determidule created

Arch

– COMMIS

N

cautions relcomplication

f the systemof the systemhat produced

lications. Added to suck th.

ations, an in The first is

owner and the related to thwas also poin same persos on how the

lt to get the c

missioning scared to the ocrepancy wiled. These solerall efficienc

general issusis, the last plhe building (Aies were detrmining whatll the activitie

ned and a nd by Burch

hitectural Eng

SSIONING

lating to the ns when it ca

ms. The ownms could be t

d dust and dedditionally, thhe dirt from t

nterview withsue that was

hat they did nhe commissinted out that

onnel who rae systems shoommissionin

hedule will briginal schedll be determilutions are oncy of the com

ues that coullanner methoAppendix E)ermined. Tht needed to bes that have

new scheduleick Constru

Universit

gineering | A

G OF LABO

cleanliness ame time to tner insisted turned on; hoebris. This inhe existing Cthe project in

h the projects described wnot get involoning of the t the commis

an the field teould work. Tng agents to v

be developedule used onined. Thesenly some of t

mmissioning p

ld happen ood was utilize). With the suhis was donebe completed an impact on

e was createuction (Appe

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ORATORY

and precisioturn on the m on the laboowever, thernterrupted th

Chevron Townto the existi

t’s MEP coorwas that the lved until the building wasssioning ageests. This caThe final issuvisit the site.

ed using the n the Chevroe differences the multiple cprocess.

n any projeced to develoubstantial coe by workingd in order to n the mechan

ed, it was coendix F). D

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 23

Y SPACES

on of the aremechanical eoratory spacre were still lhe owner’s oc

wer was in aning tower, m

rdinator, Jeff commissionie project was the lack of

ents that reviaused some pe that was br

last planneron Annex. D will be analchanges that

ct, dependinop a detailed ompletion datg backwards allow the curnical equipm

ompared to tDuring the

on Annex t Mroskey

eas. The quipment

ces being long lead ccupancy

n extreme making the

Stouden, ing agent

as already site visits ewed the problems rought up

r method. During the lyzed and t could be

ng on the schedule te known,

s from the rrent task

ment start-

the actual schedule

compariswere disc

Key Differ

A Fo N St A A La

These keywhile comhandling By delayiwhich wafinished p

The archiconditiondeviationmillwork items. Thdust free contractostrobic fa

The abocommissiwhich puaffected ttile to be

The nipplwork wasitem. Onresulting

The labordeliveredthe casewlaboratorfabricate,

The probschedule ultimately

son and projecovered and

rences:

Air Handling Uootball Shrou

Nipple Plenumtrobic Fan Sta

Architectural MAbove Ceiling

aboratory Ca

y differencesmpiling pos units (AHU’sing the start-uas a major coproducts that

itectural millned air throun in moisture also requiredhis delayed th to properly

ors that did nans.

ve ceiling ioning. The wushed back the mechanic installed to c

le plenums as not well dence this scop in the ceiling

ratory casewd on time, thwork installery casework a, deliver and

lems discuss comparisony responsible

ect team inter are listed be

Units uds at Fume Hms art-Up Millwork & Dg Work / Neeasework

s were analyzsible solutio). The AHU’sup date of thncern of this were to be i

lwork in the ughout the be content wod a lot of altehe strobic fan

y test and banot adequate

work was work that wathe start-up cal equipmecomplete thei

lso caused thefined and thpe problem wg space to the

work was anotere were mu

ed in its entialso involved install.

sed above are. A number e because o

Arch

rviews, mainelow:

Hoods

Dust-Free Acted for Access

zed to determons. First ans were delivee AHU’s mea

s project. Thinstalled, mos

student deskbuilding. Thould result ierations; causns’ start-up dalance. Addely define the

another conas being perf

of the mechnt start-up wir system eva

he ceilings tohere was conwas resolveden get closed

ther issue relultiple changirety, the cod a number o

e only the ma of smaller pf the lack of

hitectural Eng

differences

ivities s Above Ceili

mine the contnd foremostered later thaant that the bis was a mainst of which re

k area was oe millwork win the expansing small amdate because itionally, thee appropriat

ntributing faformed abovehanical equi

was because aluations.

o remain openfusion on wh

d, the fabricad up.

lating to the dges associateommissioningof different c

ain problemsproblems alsof detail in the

Universit

gineering | A

and problem

ing

tributing factt, the main an expected,

building wouln concern beequired cond

one of the mawas extremending and comounts of dus

the laboratoere was a lacte cleanlines

actor to thee the ceilingipment. The the commiss

n for an extenhich contractation of the n

delay of the wd with the ca

g of the builcustom items

s and concerno occurred be scope of w

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ms with the co

tors that causproblem foc which delayld not receiveecause of theditioned air.

ain items affeely detailed ontracting ost from the cuory areas neeck of informss that was n

e problems g was taking le reason thesioning agen

nded periodor owned th

nipple plenum

work. Althouasework andlding was un that require

ns that were but it was uncwork within t

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 24

ommissioning

sed the discrecused aroundyed their stare any conditi

e significant a

ected by theand precisef the materi

utting and fitteded to be coation provid

needed to tur

experiencedlonger than ee above ceilnt required a

d of time. Thee work relat

ms was able

ugh the cased lab spaces.nable to begd a significan

discovered wclear which pthe project.

on Annex t Mroskey

g process

epancies, d the air t-up date. ioned air, amount of

e delay of e and any ials. The ting of the ompletely

ded to the rn on the

d during expected, ling work all ceiling

e scope of ed to this to begin;

work was . Without gin. The nt time to

within the party was The next

section dconfusion

SOLUTI

As discucommissito the Che

The delaproblemscritical pproblemscritical pahave beeapproval would hatime.

If this prpossibilitbeing prereducing componetesting an

Reducingpreventeresulted define thneeded to

Finally, thCommisstested. Aspecific commissi

Overall, tproject ocoordinatremembeconstruct

discusses posn and difficult

ONS

ssed above,ion process. evron Annex

ay in the dels for the conath item thats that resulteath item direen the propo from the Ow

ave accepted

roposed soluy to help theefabricated s the amount

ents would limnd balancing

g the confusid by a morein confusing

he requiremeo occur befor

he commissiosioning trackA handover d

equipment. ioning proce

there were a on schedule.tion that neeer that constr a building o

ssible solutioty that occurr

, there were This section

x.

livery date fstruction of tt affected a n

ed from this ectly affectedosal of workiwner of the e the proposa

ution was noe project stayshould have of time nee

mit the amoun to possibly b

ion and diffie detailed sc and an inad

ents of each re the testing

oning process systems anocument set This set iss (Vela Syst

number of id These sol

eded to be dructing a buif the highest

Arch

ons that couldred during th

e a number discusses po

for the AHUthe project. number of acdelay, a lett

d the completing overtimeextra costs t

al and extra c

ot accepted y on schedulbeen. This weded to instant of time thabegin on the

iculties encocope of workdequate amo

party, resulg and balanci

ss could havend equipmen is also creates then delivems, 2012).

deas and sollutions were done throughilding is a te quality poss

hitectural Eng

d have beenhe commissio

of problemossible soluti

’s was a ma This deliverctivities throer could havtion date of te to maintainhat would bcosts, allowin

by the Ownle. Any comwould allow all the items

at the ceiling original date

untered durk for the con

ount of risk sting in repeing of the me

e been simplint as they areed by electrovered to the

utions that co not discove

hout the progeam effort anible.

Universit

gineering | A

n implementeoning proces

ms that resulions to these

ain problem ry date and t

oughout the pve been writthe project. n the substane encounterng the possib

ner, prefabrimponents or s

the compones in the field needed to be.

ring the endntractors. Thsharing. Theeat work; espechanical equ

ified by the ue delivered, onically tyinge owner, sp

ould have beered becausgress meetin

nd everyone

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

ed on the prs on the Chev

lted in a co problems th

that contribthe installatioproject. In otten to the O Also includential compleed. More thbility of comp

ication couldsystems that ents to begind. Prefabricbe open and e

d of construche informatio

e scopes propecially in thuipment coul

use of technol installed, reg all relevantpeeding up

een implemese of the lacngs. Therefoinvolved sho

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 25

roject to minvron Annex.

onfusing andhat are related

buted to manon of the AHorder to min

Owner statinged in this lettetion date, rehan likely, thpleting the p

d have been had the posn being sizedcating the mexposed, allo

ction could aon that was

ovided did nohe final clead begin.

logy in the fieadied for tet documentat the deliver

ented to helpck of leaderore, it is impould work to

on Annex t Mroskey

nimize the

d difficult d directly

ny of the HUs was a nimize the g that this er should equesting he Owner project on

n another ssibility of d and cut, echanical owing the

also been provided ot clearly

an up that

eld. Vela sting and tion to the ry of the

keep the rship and portant to

ogether to

SUMMA

After thorhave bee

Gin

R Th

th Th St A

ex Th

p Th

ARY

roughly analyn made:

Get the commn hand with thequire the cohe same com

he testing he commissiotart-Up of the

An adequate axpected of thhe commissiroject to minhe commissio

yzing the com

missioning aghe design teaommissioningmmissioning

oning agent ne AHU’s was aamount of infhem to be ablioning proce

nimize the numoning proces

Arch

mmissioning

gent involvedam to spot pog agent to visagent should

needs to be aa critical pathformation neele to turn on

ess, as a whmber of unfoss is affected

hitectural Eng

process for

d in the projeossible issuessit the projecd do the sub

available whh item, delayeds to be prothe strobic fa

hole, should reseen prob by all trades

Universit

gineering | A

the Chevron

ect during thes ct site routinebmittal and R

hen they are sying multiple ovided to infoans be an area lems s

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

n Annex, the

e design pha

ely RFI reviews a

schedule activities orm/define t

of interest t

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 26

following co

ase so they w

and then com

he contracto

throughout t

on Annex t Mroskey

onclusions

work hand

me and do

rs what is

the entire

TECHN

PROBLE

The Chevprotectionall placedpackage flashing t

After lookproject mOnce thisGhildyal the additidecided tbe perfor

BACKGR

Before anDuring Ugreen rootake the aconsidereby Utkars

There aregreen rooeffect, asincreaseswhich can

To assist Building Awith a grgreen roofoot, as crequire edesignedimposed

NICAL ANA

EM IDENTI

vron Annex’sn board on td on top of mwas bid se

o the façade

king into themanager, it ws was foundof Renaissanional expensthat the initiarmed.

ROUND RE

ny changes toUtkarsh’s inte

of to a buildiadditional soed. More mash, http://gba

e a number oofs help redu well as red

s the marketn reduce the

with compiliAlliance (GB

reen roof. Gofs are lightecompared to excessive mad to provide

on the roof. (

ALYSIS 4 –

FICATION

s roof consishree inch tapmetal deckinparately, wh systems.

e idea of addwas discovered out, one once 3 Architee of adding a

al idea of a gr

ESEARCH

o the roof derview, he offing. First an

oil load. Alsoaintenance byapgh.org/ an

of benefits assuce the amou

duce greenhotability of the potential for

ing informatiBA) was extreGenerally, theer and less ex the 80-150

aintenance an a space of (GBAPGH, 20

Arch

– ADDITIO

N

ts of a new Tpered insulang supportedhich caused

ding a greened that the Af the Archite

ects. While ta green roof; reen roof wo

esign or struffered a numnd foremost, to, a root barry the Owner

nd the city of

sociated withunt of heatinouse gases. e building. flooding and

ion, the souremely helpfuere are two

xpensive thanpounds per nd are not in interaction 012)

hitectural Eng

ON OF A G

Thermoplastiation with air d by the buil some comp

n roof to theAnnex’s origects involvedalking with U so there wasuld be taken

ucture, a bettmber of sugge

the roof wourier and a thi would also bPortland.

h the additiong and coolin Adding a g Green roofsd water conta

ces providedul in develop

types of gren intensive. Tsquare foot

ntended for ubetween nat

Universit

gineering | A

GREEN RO

ic-Polyolefin barrier and lding’s steel

plications wh

e Chevron Anginal design d with the pUtkarsh, he ss no detailedn to the next s

ter understanestions and i

uld need addicker layer obe required.

n of a green rng needed. Tgreen roof als also reducamination. (G

d by Utkarshping an undeeen roofs; exThey typicall of an intensuse by humature and hu

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

OOF

(TPO) syste gypsum boal frame. Addhen installing

nnex and intintended on project was stated that th

d information step and a de

nding of greissues to con

ditional structof waterproof

Two sources

roof to a builThey help relso provides ce a buildingGBAPGH, 201

h were first rrstanding of

xtensive and ly weight 10-sive roof. Exans. Howeveumans, which

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 27

m that is plaard sheathingditionally, thg the transit

terviewing B having a grinterviewed

he owner did provided. Itetailed analy

en roofs wasnsider when tural reinforcfing would nes were also s

lding. As maeverse the he sound insul

g’s stormwate12)

reviewed. Th the layers a intensive. E-50 pounds pxtensive roo

er, intensive h increases t

on Annex t Mroskey

aced over g. This is

he roofing tions and

Burchick’s reen roof.

d; Utkarsh d not want t was then

ysis would

s needed. adding a cement to eed to be

suggested

any know, eat island ation and er runoff,

he Green associated Extensive er square

ofs do not roofs are the loads

Regardlewaterprosecond lawater, asThe typesto be livinplants beconsider

In additioinstance, wind is afrom blow

The layerfor the rostructure.

PROPOS

When coconsidereAnnex’s r

Once an developeintensive

In additiogreen rooadding anThis cannconnectio

ss of the typeofing. The w

ayer associat well as prevs of medium,ng on the gre

eing installed drought and

on to these fo a small laye

an issue, a wiwing soil off o

rs and detailiof can place . Additionall

SED DESIG

onsidering aded. First off, roof will be a

intensive gred. With th green roof d

on to the conof needs to bn intensive g

not be accomon between t

e of roof, botwaterproofingted with a grventing the p, mixture andeen roof. Fin

d on a green r wind-resista

our layers, ser of gravel cind erosion lof the roof.

ing of a gree additional loly, the draina

GN

dding a gree the primary ccessible for

reen roof wahe help of Adesign was ab

nsiderations pbe consideredreen roof to t

mplished with the Chevron

Figure 7 Sta

Arch

h types consg is used to peen roof is thpotential for d depth of thenally, vegetatroof should b

ant plants.

everal speciaan be placedlayer can be

en roof is a croads on the roage associate

en roof to a function of thr human use,

as chosen, thAmerican Hyble to be dev

previously dd. Also, the the Chevron a roof hatch Annex’s roo

andard Lawn Ass

hitectural Eng

sist of four baprevent the phe drainage.leaking and e growing mtion is anothebe non-invas

alized layers d on the drai

e added to th

ritical step inoof and struc

ed with the ad

a building, thhe green roo an intensive

he design androtech, Inc

veloped (Figu

discussed, theonly point of Annex, the m, so it is prop

of and the ex

sembly Courtesy

Universit

gineering | A

asic layers. Tpenetration o. The draina rotting. A g

medium depeer layer needive and nativ

can be choseinage layer the growing m

n the design cture, which wddition of a g

here are a nof needs to b roof will be

nd detailing c.’s website ure 7).

e drainage af access to th

main purposeposed that a nxisting Chevr

y of American Hy

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

The first layerof any water iage is used togrowing med

ends on the tyded for a greve to the regi

en to be addo provide ex

medium laye

process. Thwill result in a

green roof nee

number of itbe determine chosen over

of the greeand literatu

associated wihe roof is throe is for use bynew access pron Tower’s

ydrotech, Inc.

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 28

r of a green rinto the buildo help removdium is also ypes of planteen roof. Theion. It is also

ded to the dextra drainageer to prevent

he more layera need to inceds to be ana

tems that need. Since the an extensive

en roof needure, a typica

ith the additiough a roof hy the buildin

point be crea10th floor. Th

on Annex t Mroskey

roof is the ding. The ve excess essential. ts that are e types of o smart to

sign. For e. Also, if the wind

rs chosen crease the alyzed.

eed to be e Chevron e one.

ded to be al shallow

ion of the hatch. By g’s users.

ated at the his would

require thpoint. A proposedonly grastwo feet w

INSTALL

Due to thof the sysand are d

The first sthe membmembranof the mmembran

Once the seal. Afteover the pin order t

Next, thethicknessall drain drainage

he removal o plan view ofd green roof ss and concrewide. The res

LATION PR

e complexitystem. To ass

described be

step involvedbrane terminne consists ofembrane is

ne while still w

membrane aer the membprevious layeto protect aga

e insulation is of the insulalocations and component

of the womenf the proposelayout and itete pavers. Tst of the roof

ROCEDURE

y of a green rsist with the ilow (Figure 8

Ac

Le

Ro

Ins

Ga

Fil

Sy

Ha

Lit

Er

Ro

Mi

d with constrnation pointsf one coat at then installe

warm to ensu

and Hydroflerane is approer, extendingainst the later

s to be laid ation should bd ensure proof the system

Fi

Arch

n’s toilet in ted green roots componenThe pavers a is covered in

E

roof system, installation, s8). (Hydrotec

ctivity Name

eak Test

oot Stop - Loo

sulation - Lo

ardendrain 3

ll Gardendra

stemFilter

ardscape Ele

te Top Grow

osion Contro

oll GardMat

isc. Planting

ructing a gre are located 90 mils into wed at 125 mure good adh

ex 30 are instoved, the Rog it full heighral growth of

loosely overbe predetermoper fitting am needs to be

igure 8 Steps As

hitectural Eng

the Chevron of can be fou

nts. Keeping are placed arn grass and is

the installatisteps for the ch, 2012)

e

ose Lay

oose Lay

30 - Loose La

ain w/ Aggre

ements & Pa

wing Media

ol Blanket

& Stake in P

gs

en roof is to above the ewhich Hydro

mils with the hesion.

alled, a leak ot Stop can b

ht to cover allf roots.

r the root bamined, basedaround all pee put in plac

ssociated with thGreen Roof

Universit

gineering | A

n Tower and und in Appen the layout siround the ens completely

ion is a cruci installation o

ay

egate

avers

Place

install the roeventual leveotech’s Flex F Hydroflex 3

test is to be be installed. l flashing and

arrier that wd on the desienetrations. ce. The Gard

he Installation of

ty of Pittsbur

April 4, 2012

a door be adndix G. Theimple, the gr

ntire perimety accessible t

ial part of theof the green

oofing membel of the soil Flash is embe30 being ro

performed tThe Root Stod lapping ad

was just previred R-value. After installidendrain 30 m

f a

rgh – ChevroRobert

| 29

dded at the e plan view sreen roof syster of the rooto humans.

e overall per roof were d

brane, makin and vegetatedded. A seclled directly

o ensure a wop is to be laidjacent sheets

viously instal. Also, cut thing the insulmaterial is to

on Annex t Mroskey

transition shows the stem uses of and are

rformance developed

ng sure all tion. This cond coat

y into the

water-tight id loosely s five feet

lled. The he foam at ation, the

o be loose

laid over all penetr

The nextHydrotecplaced ovthe soil fr

After theincorporapaver bal

Hydrotecmedia is sis rolled complete

MAINTE

Properly beautiful attention importancweeds wi

By propesimplifiedmaintena

R M Ir

The seedseeds canrecommeit reduces

Also, graroof shoukeeping t

It is also iof vegetairrigatingplanted o

the entire rorations.

step involvch’s LiteTop Ever the Garderom washing

e filter fabricated in the dellasts require

ch’s Lite Top spread to theout over the

ed, the variou

ENANCE

designing a architectura

and care thce of giving ill invade the

erly planningd and reducence. The am

emoving unwMowing, trimmrrigation

s of many unn create man

ended methos the amount

ss lawn landuld also be trthe trees and

important to ation used wig. However, on the roof, as

oof deck, wit

ved with instExpanded Agendrain and out through t

c is installedesign; which ed for wind re

growing mee desired thice growing mus plantings c

and installingl feature. Hohroughout its the green ro area and var

g for the amed. Howeve

mount of main

wanted plantsming, prunin

nwanted planny unwantedd of removin of digging n

dscapes requrimmed and

d shrubs heal

determine thithin the syst the frequens well as the i

Arch

th the aeratio

talling the gggregate. O lapped at leathe system.

d, it is then can be built esistance are

edia is then ickness, an er

media and stacan be put int

g a green roowever, a grs lifetime inoof proper arious areas o

mount of mar, it is impor

ntenance a gr

s g

ts and weedsd plants and wng these