update on plasma reconstructions in vacuum

18
Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum NCSX SWG Meeting Reiersen, Georgiyevskiy, et al PPPL June 17, 1999

Upload: jasper-roy

Post on 31-Dec-2015

28 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum. NCSX SWG Meeting Reiersen, Georgiyevskiy, et al PPPL June 17, 1999. Topics. Review last week’s results d 2 B z /dr 2 scan B t scan Symmetrization at 100% and 110% toroidal field Harmonic analysis Conclusions. Review of last week’s results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NCSX SWG MeetingReiersen, Georgiyevskiy, et alPPPLJune 17, 1999

Page 2: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Topics

• Review last week’s results

• d2Bz/dr2 scan

• Bt scan

• Symmetrization at 100% and 110% toroidal field

• Harmonic analysis

• Conclusions

Page 3: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

Review of last week’s results

• Fixed boundary VMEC had iotas from 0.033-0.288• Fixed boundary PIES results showed few good

surfaces outside 3/19 island chain• Free boundary PIES results were similar

– Iotas range from 0.05-0.158– Large stochastic region apparent outside of 3/19

islands– Approximately half the plasma volume is lost

• Outer region packed with n=3 resonances– Nine primary resonances in this region (m= 18 -10)– Spacing between resonances ranges from 7-12 mm

• Initial efforts to beat down resonances unsuccessful• J in large saddles up by almost 60%

Page 4: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

Fixed/free boundary PIES results

Fixed Boundary Free Boundary

Page 5: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

Bz varied from 0 - 1x reference• Plasma shifts outward with more positive Bz

• Minor radius at midplane increases, less indentation• Little impact on iota or number of good surfaces prior to

scraping off plasma

Reference 0.5 Reference Zero Bz

Page 6: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

dBz/dr varied from 0 - 2x reference• Increasing dBz/dr did not move axis or change height

• Lowered elongation, increasing volume with good surfaces• Doubled central iota from .042 to .100 for 2x ref, lesser impact on

edge iota

Zero dBz/dr Reference 2x Reference

Page 7: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

d2Bz/dr2 varied from -1 to +4x reference

-0.06

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.01

0

0.01

1.05 1.15 1.25 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.65 1.75 1.85

R (m)B

z (T

) 4 d2Bz/dr2

Reference

-1 d2Bz/dr2

Page 8: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

• More concave -> more crescent-shaped plasma• More convex - > more square-shaped

More concave(-1x reference)

Referenced2Bz/dr2

More convex(+4x reference)

Page 9: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Bt varied from 80-110%

• All other coil currents fixed

• Lowering Bt raises iota, decreases plasma volume by moving edge limiting resonances into the plasma region

• Raising Bt lowers iota, increasing the plasma volume by moving edge limiting resonances beyond the first wall

Page 10: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

80% TF 100% TF 110% TF

Iota(a)=0.208 Iota(a)=0.158 Iota(a)=0.157

Page 11: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Modest improvements can be achieved by symmetrization with PF

• Bz used to control radial position

• dBz/dr used to control elongation

• d2Bz/dr2 used to control “squareness”

Page 12: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Edge on symmetrized reference vacuum configuration defined by onset of overlapping islands

• Highlights need to suppress islands to grow plasma

Page 13: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Page 14: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Edge on symmetrized 110% Bt configuration defined by first wall• Highlights need to expand first wall boundary to grow plasma• Particularly in square x-section (top, bottom, and outboard) and bean-shaped cross section (inboard)

Page 15: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Harmonic analyses

• Poor correlation found between island size and Bmn - lower Bmn’s had larger islands than higher Bmn’s closer to the plasma edge

• Discrepancy may be due to not decomposing Bn in straight line coordinates (Reiman, Hirshman)

• Valanju has developed a code to do this - awaiting input on fixed boundary equilibrium from Ku for reference vacuum case

• Correlation study will be repeated

Page 16: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

TF ripple appears to have no impact on magnetic surfaces

• TF linear dimensions roughly doubled, lowering TF ripple by orders of magnitude

• No discernible impact apparent in Poincare plots

• Bmn’s impacted in fourth significant digit

Page 17: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Conclusions• The PF system provides useful knobs for controlling radial

position, elongation, and triangularity/squareness• The TF system provides a useful knob for raising/lowering

iota, moving problematic resonances into or out of the plasma in the process

• TF ripple does not have a significant impact on magnetic surfaces

• To increase plasma volume and iota, need to:– Expand first wall boundary in tight spots– Have capability to surgically suppress problematic

resonances– Reduce current density in reference configuration

• Need headroom for coil currents to increase at other operating points

– Important for flexibility!

Page 18: Update on Plasma Reconstructions in Vacuum

NC

SX

Next steps

• Explore expanded first wall boundary• Explore plasma shape and iota profile control

with saddle coils• Validate harmonic analysis methodology as

basis for suppressing islands• Explore suppression of islands with existing coil

systems– Develop functional requirements for trim coils

• Continue to explore options for reduced J in reference configuration

• Study magnetic surfaces in the reference high beta, full current configuration