u.s. doe carbon sequestration r&d program overview iea...
TRANSCRIPT
-
U.S. DOE Carbon Sequestration R&D Program Overview
Office of Fossil Energy
4th IEA International Conference on Clean Coal
Technologies
Dresden, GermanyMay 17-21, 2009
William FernaldSenior Program Manager
-
Office of Fossil Energy2
Technological Carbon Management Options
ImproveEfficiency
SequesterCarbon
•
Renewables•
Nuclear•
Fuel Switching
•
Demand Side•
Supply Side•
Capture & Store•
Enhance Natural Sinks
Reduce CarbonIntensity
All options needed to:•
Affordably meet energy demand
•
Address environmental objectives
-
Office of Fossil Energy3
Key Challenges to CCS
•
Cost of CCS
•
Sufficient Storage Capacity
•
Permanence
•
Best Practices
•
Regulatory Framework
•
Permitting
•
Liability
•
Ownership – pore space/CO2
•
Infrastructure
•
Public Acceptance (NIMBY NUMBY and BANANA)
•
Human Capital Resources
Program helping to address challenges – either specific project, participation in working groups, or through Regional Partnerships
BANANA= Build Absolutely Nothing
Anywhere Near Anything
(or Anyone)
-
Office of Fossil Energy4
InfrastructureRegional Carbon Sequestration
Partnerships & Other Large Projects
Demonstration
Simulation and Risk
Assessment
CO2Use/Reuse
GeologicCarbonStorage
Core R&DPre-
combustion Capture
Commercial Scale Projects
Global Partnerships/
CollaborationsMonitoring Verification and
Accounting
Existing Plants
Post- and Oxy- Combustion Capture
Sequestration Program Structure - FY2009Sequestration Program Structure – FY2009
-
Office of Fossil Energy5
Carbon Sequestration Program Goals Develop Technology Options for GHG Management That...
•
Deliver technologies & best practices that validate
Carbon Capture and Safe Storage (CCSS):
−
90% CO2 capture
−
99% storage permanence
−
< 10% increase in COE (pre-combustion capture)
−
< 35% increase in COE (post- and oxy-combustion)*
−
+/- 30% storage capacity
*Moved to IEP Program FY08/09 -
This is current estimate –
system studies and analysis being conducted and refined to determine appropriate goals
-
Office of Fossil Energy6
Sequestration Program Statistics FY2009
Diverse research portfolio~ 80 Active R&D Projects
Fiscal Year
DO
E B
udge
t (M
illio
n $) Strong industry support
~ 39% cost share on projects
Federal Investment to Date~ $481 Million
2009 Budget Breakdown
CO2 Use/Reuse (incl FY08 non-
CO2)3%
Simulation and Risk
Assessment4%
Capture of CO2 (Pre-
Combustion)12%
MVA9%
Geologic Carbon Sequestration
4%
Regional Partnerships
68%
0
2040
6080
100
120140
160
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Sequestration Program Statistics FY 2009
-
Office of Fossil Energy7
Capture Costs
-
Office of Fossil Energy8
Effect of CO2 Capture on Cost of Electricity(% Increase Resulting From CO2 Capture)
43
83
32 35
100
20
40
60
80
IGCC PC NGCC
Capture Is Expensive !
Effect of CO2 Capture on Capital Cost(% Increase Resulting From CO2 Capture)
35
87
110
0
20
40
60
80
100
IGCC PC NGCC
•
5–30% parasitic energy loss
•
35–110% increase in capital cost
•
30–80% increase in cost of electricity
2012 Program Goals
Source: Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Power Plants study, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.
-
Office of Fossil Energy9
Advanced physical solventsAdvanced amine solvents
Post-combustion
Pre-combustion
Oxycombustion
CO2 Compression
Amine solventsPhysical solventsCryogenic oxygen
Cos
t Red
uctio
n B
enef
it
Chemical loopingOTM boilerBiological processes
Ionic liquidsMOFsEnzymatic membranesCAR process
PBI membranes Solid sorbentsMembrane systemsITMs
Technology Advances Are Starting to Emerge
20+ yearsPresent 5+ years 10+ years 15+ years
Time to Commercialization
CO2 Compression
-
Office of Fossil Energy10
Regulatory
-
Office of Fossil Energy11
Regulatory Guidelines Emerging
•
EPA taking a lead role−
Guidance released Mar 2007
−
Draft rule summer 2008−
Public comment period closed December 24, 2008
•
EPA & DOE Working Group
•
IOGCC Framework Released May 2005
•
IOGCC Legal & Regulatory Framework Released in September 2007
CO2 Storage: A Legal and Regulatory Guide for States
Carbon Capture and Storage A Regulatory Framework for States
-
Office of Fossil Energy12
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships
and
Large-Scale Field Tests
-
Office of Fossil Energy13
DOE’s Sequestration Program Structure
Break-through
Concepts
Monitoring, Mitigation, & Verification
Non-CO2GHG
Mitigation
Storage•
Direct CO2 storage
•
Enhanced natural sinks
Core R&D
Capture of CO2
Carbon SequestrationLeadership
Forum
Carbon Carbon SequestrationSequestrationLeadership Leadership
ForumForum
Integration Projects
IntegrationIntegration ProjectsProjects
7 Regional Partnerships•
Engage regional, state, local governments
•
Determine regional sequestration benefits
•
Baseline region for sources and sinks •
Establish monitoring and verification protocols
•
Address regulatory, environmental, & outreach issues
•
Validate sequestration technology and infrastructure
Infrastructure
-
Office of Fossil Energy14
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships “Developing the Infrastructure for Wide Scale Deployment”
-
Office of Fossil Energy15
Growing Participation
160 organization in Phase I
348+ organizations in Phases II and III
Organizations Number Organizations Number
Chemical Companies 5 Land Management/Development Company 2
CO2 Trading Organizations 3 Law Firm 2
Coal Companies 8 Local Agencies 4
Electric Utilities 52 Media/Outreach 6
Engineering and Research Firms 44 National Laboratories 10
Environmental NGOs 11 Oil & Gas Companies 36
Foreign Government Agencies 10 Other State Agencies 51
Forest Products Companies 4 Pipeline Company 1
Governmental Advisory Groups 2 State Geologic Surveys 18
Indian Nations 4 U.S. Federal Agencies 6
Industry Trade Groups 22 University and Academic Institutions 47
Total 348
-
Office of Fossil Energy16
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Phases
CHARACTERIZATIONPHASE
Characterize all RCSP regions for carbon capture and storage opportunities
VALIDATION PHASE
Validate technologies through field testing at selected geologic and
terrestrial site locations
DEPLOYMENT PHASE
Complete large-volume deployment tests of sequestration technologiesthat will help enable future commercial-scale applications
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20172003FISCAL YEAR
CHARACTERIZATIONPHASE
Characterize all RCSP regions for carbon capture and storage opportunities
VALIDATION PHASE
Validate technologies through field testing at selected geologic
and terrestrial site locations
DEVELOPMENT PHASE
Complete large-volume development tests of sequestration technologiesthat will help enable future commercial scale applications-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20172003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20172003FISCAL YEAR
Scale of 100 to 10,000 Tons CO2
Scale of 1,000,000 Tons CO2
-
Office of Fossil Energy17
Summary of Partnerships Phase II Projects
-
Office of Fossil Energy18
Validation Phase (II) Field Tests
Geologic Tests (20+ injection tests)−
Validating geologic formation capacities−
Validating injectivity−
Monitoring, verification, and accounting technologies (reservoir modeling)
−
Permitting requirements−
Public outreach and perception−
Testing formation seals−
Investigating well bore construction methods
Terrestrial Tests (11 field tests)−
Tree-plantings−
No-till farming−
Wetlands restoration−
Land management: grasslands, grazing lands−
Fire management −
Forest preservation−
Monitoring, mitigation, and verification technologies−
accounting protocols for trading markets (CCX)
Geologic Field Test Sites
Terrestrial Field Test Sites
-
Office of Fossil Energy19
North American CO2 Storage Potential (Giga Tons)
Sink Type Low HighSaline Formations 3300 13000Unmineable Coal Seams 160 180
Oil and Gas Fields 140 140
Available for download at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasII/atlasII.pdf
U.S. Emissions ~ 6 GT CO2 /yr all sources
Hundreds of Years of Storage Potential
National Atlas Highlights (Phase II) Adequate Storage Projected
U.S. Emissions ~ 6 GT CO2/yr all sources
Saline Formations
Oil and Gas Fields Unmineable Coal Seams
Conservative Resource
Assessment
-
Office of Fossil Energy20
Development Phase (III) Field Test Program
-
Office of Fossil Energy21
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Stage 1.Site selection and characterization; Permittingand NEPA compliance; Well completion and
testing; Infrastructure development
Stage 2.CO2 procurement and transportation;
Injection operations; Monitoring activities
Stage 3.Site closure; Post-injection monitoring,
Project assessment
RCSP Deployment Phase – 10 years (FY2008-2017)
FISCAL YEAR
20082008 20102010 20122012 20142014 20162016 20182018
Stage 1.Site selection and characterization; Permittingand NEPA compliance; Well completion and
testing; Infrastructure development
Stage 2.CO2 procurement and transportation;
Injection operations; Monitoring activities
Stage 3.Site closure; Post-injection monitoring,
Project assessment
RCSP Development Phase – 10 years (FY2008-2017)
FISCAL YEAR
Development Phase Scaling Up Towards Commercialization
~$500 million DOE - over $200 million cost share
Scale up is required to provide insight into several operational and technical issues that differ from formation to formation
-
Office of Fossil Energy22
Injection Schedule2009 Injection Scheduled
2010 Injection Scheduled
2011 Injection Scheduled
WESTCARBWESTCARB
Big SkyBig Sky
SWPSWP
PCORPCORMRCSPMRCSP
MGSCMGSC
SECARBSECARB
Large Scale Field Tests (Phase III)Injection Schedule
6 7
9
5Partnership Formation
TypeSaline
Saline
Saline
Saline/Oil Bearing
Oil Bearing
Saline
Saline
Saline
1
1
4
4
5
6
7
9
82 3
8
3
2
-
Office of Fossil Energy23
Development Phase Outcomes
•
Site characterization requirements•
Storage capacity assessment•
Design criteria−
Injection wells−
Regional monitoring, mitigation, and verification program
−
Site Closure•
Permitting requirements•
Validate reservoir and risk assessment models
•
Science Protocols•
Best practice manuals•
Accelerate public outreach
Site Selection and Detailed
Characterization
Simulationand MMV
Construction
Site Operations
and Monitoring
Closure and MMV
-
Office of Fossil Energy24
RCSP Looking Forward
•
Next Steps−Conduct additional large scale projects in targeted reservoirs,
such as coal seams and basalts− Increase size of injection projects to simulate emissions from
very large sources (A 500 MW power plant can emit 3-4 MM tons/yr)
−Expand regional drilling efforts to collect cores on saline formations to determine their characteristics
−Conduct additional small scale injections in high priority formations to increase confidence in capacity and injectivity and confirm 'reserves'
-
Office of Fossil Energy25
Visit Office of Fossil Energy & NETL Websites
http://fossil.energy.gov/ http://www.netl.doe.gov
U.S. DOE Carbon Sequestration R&D Program�OverviewTechnological Carbon Management OptionsKey Challenges to CCS�Carbon Sequestration Program Goals� Develop Technology Options for GHG Management That... Sequestration Program Statistics FY2009Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Technology Advances Are Starting to EmergeSlide Number 10Regulatory Guidelines EmergingSlide Number 12DOE’s Sequestration Program StructureRegional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships�“Developing the Infrastructure for Wide Scale Deployment”Growing ParticipationRegional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships� Program PhasesSummary of �Partnerships Phase II ProjectsValidation Phase (II) Field TestsNational Atlas Highlights (Phase II) �Adequate Storage Projected� U.S. Emissions ~ 6 GT CO2/yr all sourcesDevelopment Phase (III) Field Test ProgramDevelopment Phase�Scaling Up Towards CommercializationSlide Number 22Development Phase�OutcomesRCSP Looking ForwardSlide Number 25