use of urea for crop production in kentucky

3
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Soil Science News and Views Plant and Soil Sciences 3-1984 Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky Wilbur W. Frye University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Follow this and additional works at: hps://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views Part of the Soil Science Commons is Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Soil Science News and Views by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Repository Citation Frye, Wilbur W., "Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky" (1984). Soil Science News and Views. 173. hps://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views/173

Upload: others

Post on 25-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky

University of KentuckyUKnowledge

Soil Science News and Views Plant and Soil Sciences

3-1984

Use of Urea for Crop Production in KentuckyWilbur W. FryeUniversity of Kentucky

Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you.

Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views

Part of the Soil Science Commons

This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Soil ScienceNews and Views by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Repository CitationFrye, Wilbur W., "Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky" (1984). Soil Science News and Views. 173.https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views/173

Page 2: Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture

Lexington, Kentu 40546

epartment of Agronomy

Soil Science News&Views

••

Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1984

USE OF UREA FOR CROP PRODUCTION IN KENTUCKY

W. W. Frye

Current trends indicate that urea will become the major source of solid and liquid N fertilizer in the future. Although urea has several advantages over other N fertil­izers, especially in manufacturing, transporting, and marketing, there are some poten­tial agronomic problems that farmers should keep in mind when using urep .

Urea as a Fertilizer

Urea is a white, crystalline, prilled or granulated material containing about 45% N, the highest of all solid N fertilizers . It has excellent handling qualities and dissolves readily in water, making it a good source of N for direct application, for blended solid fertilizers, or for liquid fertilizers . The use of urea fertilizer has increased rapidly in recent years . In Kentucky, the use of solid urea fertilizer in­creased from about 1,450 tons in 1965 to almost 60,000 tons in 1982, while N solution fertilizers, most of which contain urea, increased from about 19,000 to 66,000 tons.

Although urea is highly soluble in water, it must undergo a process called hydro­lysis before theN is available to plants. The hydrolysis process occurs as follows:

(NH2)2co (urea) + 2H2o ~(NH4 ) 2 co 3 (ammonium carbonate)

Urea hydrolysis is greatly accelerated by the presence of urease, an enzyme that is abundant in soil ,on plant leaves, and on crop residues. Thus, under favorable temper­ature and moisture conditions, urea ·usually hydrolyzes rapidly whether in the soil, on the soil surface, or on the surface of live or dead plants. The hydrolysis is essen­tially complete in 4 to 7 days .

Ammonia Volatilization during Hydrolysis

The greatest potential agronomic problem with urea fertilizer arises during hydro­lysis. Some of the ammonium carbonate breaks down to ammonia, carbon dioxide and water, and some of the ammonia may be lost by volatilization into the atmosphere. If urea is applied on the surface and is not tilled or washed into the soil within a few hours, there is potential for a large amount of N to be lost, depending on the conditions that

The College of Agriculture I san Equal OpportunltyOr~antzat ton with respect toeduC'atlon and employment and Is authorized to provide research. educational tnfonnatlon and other services only to individuals and Institutions that function without regard to race. color. national ortgtn. sex. religion. age and handicap. Inquiries regarding compliance with Title VI and Tille VII or the Civil Rights Act or t964. Tille IX or the Educational Amendments. Section 504 or the Rehabilitation Act and other related matters should be directed to Equal Opportunity O[[lce. Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service. University or Kentucky. Room S-105. Agricultural Science Building-North. Lexington. Kentucky. 40546.

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AND KENTUCKY COUNTIES, COOPERATING

Page 3: Use of Urea for Crop Production in Kentucky

exist as the urea hydrolyzes . High soil and air temperatures, high soil pH (greater than 6.5), dry weather, and moist soil drying rapidly are among the most important fac­tors that increase ammonia volatilization. Research results in Kentucky suggests that the single most important factor determining the amount of N loss is whether or not rain washes the urea into the soil within about 3 days following a surface appli­cation .

How to Control Volatilization Loss

If urea is tilled or washed into the soil, little or no loss from volatilization of ammonia occurs . Since the soil is not tilled when fertilizing pastures, hay crops, or no-tillage row crops and rainfall is difficult to predict, there is a risk that some N i-11- b-e-tos-t- whernrrea ·-s us-ed-fu-r ttres-e-crop-s-. - eertain -things ca-n be cton-e- to mini­mize that risk . For pastures and hay crops, timing the application is probably the most effective control. Results of research at Princeton, Ky. showed that when urea

was broadcast topdress on a fescue sward in early May or before, apparently there was little or no loss of N. When applied after early May, the efficiency of urea was signif­icantly inferior to ammonium nitrate, a source from which volatilization loss is not likely to occur. Other studies in Kentucky showed that urea was as effective as ammo­nium nitrate when applied as a topdress on wheat and barley in March.

Some application methods have been shown to increase the efficiency of urea fer- ~ tilizers for no- tillage crops. These include band application of solid urea or N solution below the soil surface by knifing or chiseling and band application of N solution through dribble tubes instead of spraying it uniformly over the surface.

Summary

Urea is an excellent solid or liquid fertilizer material when tilled or washed into the soil; but, when surface-applied, there is a potential for a substantial amount of the N to be lost by ammonfa volatilization under certain weather, soil, and appli­cation conditions. For surface application of N solution, the risk of volatilization loss can be minimized by applying in bands rather than broadcasting. Urea applied on the surface early in the spring (mid-May or before) has proven to be as effective as

- ammon i um- n-i-t-Ht-t-e--:l-A- f..e r>-t-i-1-i-z-i ne~-trt>e s-;- f.(')-r-n-fle-L r orr<> , a-n-d- s moll q rcri n c roo s .

SOIL SCIENCE NEWS II' VIEWS Dep~entof~onorny

College of Agriculture :University of Kentucky ~on,Kentucky 40546

AG. LIBR,c.\RY N-24 AG SCI NORTH

LEXINGTON 1·\Y

U.S. POSTAGE PAID

NON-PROFIT ORG. PERMIT NO. 51 LEXINGTON, KY

SSNV •