· web viewsachin gupta–[email protected] department of mechanical engineering...
TRANSCRIPT
ANALYTICAL & COMPUTATIVE THERMAL ANALYSIS ON STRAIGHT FINS
Mr. KUNDAN SINGH DESHWAL, Mr. SACHIN GUPTAKUNDAN SINGH DESHWAL- [email protected]
SACHIN GUPTA–[email protected] OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
SEEMANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PITHORAGARH (UK)A CONSTITUTEINSTITUTE OF UTTARAKHAND TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
ABSTRACT
Thermal behavior of Rectangular and Triangular fin is
analytically investigated using first principle. Two different
methods of solution are implemented in this study. First, an
analytical closed form solution of the problem under-
consideration is obtained manually since the governing
equations and their boundary conditions are linear. Second,
the solution is developed in modeling form using
HYPERWORKS Software and compared with developed
closed form analytical solution. The results of this study
show that MATLAB can be used effectively and efficiently
to solve challenging heat transfer problems. The length,
base thickness, and end thickness of the fin is specified.
Coarse, medium, and fine mesh types are available.
Thermal conductivity of the fin material is specified. A
constant temperature condition is applied at the base of the
fin. Fully insulated and convective boundary conditions can
be applied at the tip of the fin. The results report base wall
temperature, total area for heat convection, heat dissipation
rate, fin efficiency, fin effectiveness and Contours of
temperature distribution & heat flux.
Keywords: MATLAB, Analytical, Thermal behavior, HYPERWORKS,
INTRODUCTION
Profile under convective conditions was first proposed by
Schmidt (1926) [1] based on a physical reasoning. Later on
Duffin (1959) [2] proved Schmidt criteria using calculus of
variation. . LAI was used for optimizing fin shapes under
convective, radiating, convective-radiating condition, Liu
[3](1962), for fins with heat generation and for variable
thermal conductivity.
Maday (1974) [4] in his pioneering analysis proposed the
correct formulation for the optimization of longitudinal fin
with the elimination of LAI and obtained a profile much
different from Duffin (1959). Maday (1974) [4] further
extended this analysis for radial fins. However, fin shapes
determined by the above procedure are complex and
difficult to manufacture. Sonn [5] (1981) considered the
effect of profile curvature on the optimum dimensions of
longitudinal fins of triangular, concave and convex
parabolic profile. Chung and Kan (1987) [6] determined the
optimum dimensions of spines having different profiles
(cylindrical, conical, concave and convex parabolic) from a
generalized formulation using a numerical procedure. Fins
are used to enhance convective heat transfer in a wide
range of engineering applications, and offer a practical
means for achieving a large total heat transfer surface area
without the use of an excessive amount of primary surface
area. Fins are commonly applied for heat management in
electrical appliances such as computer power supplies or
substation transformers. Other applications include IC
engine cooling, such as fins in a car radiator. It is important
to predict the temperature distribution within the fin in
order to choose the configuration that offers maximum
effectiveness. This exercise serves as a visualization tool
for evaluating the effect of shape on fin effectiveness,
efficiency, and temperature distribution. In many heat
transfer applications, it is desirable to increase the surface
area that is available for the heat transfer process; this is
particularly true when one desires to dissipate heat to a low
conductivity medium such as air. On the other hand Ulman
and Kalman (1989) [7] solved the conduction equation for
radial fins of different profiles (straight, hyperbolic,
triangular and parabolic) numerically to find out the rate of
heat dissipation.
HyperWorks:
Altair HyperWorks is the engineering frame work for
product design for maximizing product performance,
automating design process and improving profitability with
an open and flexible environment. Built from the core up to
be programmable, automated and interoperable with all
major commercial CAD system and CAE solvers.
Hyperworks enable innovation by providing high end,
value–based product design solution within one common
engineering environment.HyperWorks comprises a suite of
application that includes Hyper Mesh, optistruct, Radioss,
Hyper Crash, Hyper View. Hyper Graph 3D, Motion View,
media view, Text View, FM Model, Hyper Study,
Assembler process manager, Providing Modeling and
assembly, robust design and Optimization.
OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENT WORK:
As is evident from the diversity of application areas, the
study of heat transfer in Straight Rectangular and
Triangular fins is very important for the technology of
today and the near future, as developments are following
the trend of miniaturization in all fields. Analysis shows
that the Rectangular and Triangular heat sinks were studied
extensively, but there is limited research related to the
performance study of fins using ALTAIR HYPERWORKS
models. Following from the investigation, this work studies
based on the derivation the equation from the first
principles and heat transfer, which couples in a Rectangular
and Triangular fin and heat conduction in the solids.
The present work is undertaken to study the following aspects of:
ALTAIR HYPER WORKS modeling to understand its
thermal behavior.
Validation of the models by comparing the present
Computational results with the data available in the
Analytical study. Parameter sensitivity study of Straight
fin. Comparison between Straight Rectangular and
Triangular fin through computationally and analytical value
in all aspect.
SPECIFICATION OF PROBLEM:
Consider the two types of the fin, first one is Straight
Rectangular and second one is Straight Triangular fin.
Whose physical geometry is same, that means the length L
is.025 meter, width w is .06 meter and thickness t is .004
meter .These fin are made of two different materials which
is Steel and Aluminium, have a thermal conductivity is
17,237 w/m-k respectively. The convective heat transfer
coefficient is 40w/m2-k. Ambient temperature is 300c and
fin wall temperature is 4000c is constant over the cross-
section.
Figure 1: Specification of Straight Rectangular fin and Triangular fin
BOUNDARY CONDITION:
In fin problems it is always assumed that the base of the fin is maintained at a known temperature [8] [9] [10]
(1)
There are three common possibilities for the other end.
(2)
Insulated tip, or symmetry
(3)
Infinitely long fin
(4)
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION OF STRAIGHT
RECTANGULAR FIN:The rate of heat conduction into the element = the rata of heat conduction out the element +the rate of heat Convection from the element surface
Q(x) = Q(x) + ddx
[Q(x)] d x + h d A s[T(x)-T ∞]
ddx
( ACdtdx
) – h d A s
k dx [T(x)-T ∞] = 0
Using element surface area d A s= pdx, then
d2t (x)
dx2 – h p
k AC [T(x)-T ∞] =0
(5)
Where the cross section area AC , perimeter p, heat transfer coefficient h, thermal conductivity of fin material k are treated constant,
Let θ (x) = [T(x)-T ∞] (6)
And m 2 = h pk AC
(7)
Substituting, in eqn. (5) we get,
d2t (x)
dx2 - m2θ = 0
It is linear homogeneous, second order differential equation, it can be solved by using operator D
(D2-m2) θ =0, d θdx
= - mθ, on integration,
(x)=c1e-mx+c2emx
(8)Where the constant c1 and c2 of integration are evaluated
from the boundary condition specified for the fin. A fin is
usually very thin and long enough so that the heat loss from
the fin tip may be assumed negligible .The boundary
condition for such infinite long fin, at the fin tip.
[ d θdx
] x=L =0
Substituting, in eqn. (5) we get,
C1=C2 eml
e−ml
At x=0, θo = C1 + C2,or, it give C2=θ o e−ml
(eml+e−ml)
And, C1 =θo - C2 It gives C1= θ o eml
(eml+e−ml)
Using the value C1and C2of and in eqn. (5), we get
θ(x)θ o
= T ( x )−T ∞
T o−T ∞ =
em(l−X )+e−m(l−X )
(eml+e−ml)In terms of hyperbolic function
θ(x)θ o
= T ( x )−T ∞
T o−T ∞ =
cosh {m(L−x )}coshmL
(9)
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION OF STRAIGHT TRIANGULAR FIN:
Assuming the sufficient thin fin (L>>t), so the one dimension heat conduction can be considered.
ddx
( ACdtdx
) – h d A s
k dx [T(x) -T ∞] = 0
(10)
For a Straight Triangular fin, the cross-section area varies with fin length. Its value at any x position in terms of length ratio x/L is given by
AC= A(x) = w t xL
The perimeter, P = 2wSurface area, dAs = Pdx = 2wdxSubstituting AC and dAs in energy equation
ddx
(w txL
dTdx
) – h2 w dx
k dx [T(x) -T ∞] = 0
d2
dx2 (T ) + 1x
dTdx
– 2hLk tx
(T -T ∞) =0
Introducing θ = (T -T ∞)
d2
dx2 (θ) + 1x
d θdx
– 2h Lk tx
(θ¿ =0
Introducing, β 2 = 2hLk t
(11)And multiplying throughout by x2, we get
x2 d2
dx2 (θ) + xd θdx
– β 2 x (θ ¿ =0
(12)
The eqn. (9) is a modified Bessel equation and its solution is
(θ ¿ = C1Io (2β √x) + C2ko (2β √x) (15)
Where Io and ko are modified zero order Bessel function of
the first and second kind, respectively and C1and C2 are
constant of integration and are evaluated from boundary
condition. At x=0,θ =finite, dθdx
= 0, It gives
C2 =0,At x=L (at root) θ=θ0, using
θ0= C1Io (2β √L)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Figure 2: Temperature distribution along the different position of fin
Figure 3: Variation in temperature distribution for along the different position of fin with thickness t=14 (mm)
Figure 4: Variation in Heat Transfer Rate Q (W) at different position of fin
Figure 5: Variation in fin efficiency at different position of fin.
Figure 6: Variation in fin effectiveness at different position of fin.
(a)
(b)
Figure 7: Contours of temperature distribution for Steel ma- terial (a) Straight Rectangular fin (b) Straight Triangular fin
(a)
(b)
Figure 8: Contours of Heat Flux (w/m2) for Alumin -iummaterial (a) Straight Rectangular fin (b) Straight Triangular fin
CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE SCOPE OF THE WORK
The computational results is successfully validated the analytical data for a Straight Rectangular and Triangular fin. Grid temperature and heat flux contours represent successfully the thermal behavior of the system .Fin wall temperature is decreasing along the length direction of Straight Rectangular and Triangular fin and Steel material, which has lower value of thermal conductivity (k) drop down more temperature. As we are using the same material of fin with larger surface area then we will achieve high heat transfer rate Q (W) and heat flux (W/m2).Higher the heat transfer rate Q (W), higher value of fin effectiveness and fin efficiency. Aluminium material obtains larger value of fin efficiency and fin effectiveness then Steel. Triangular fin contains less amount of material and high amount of
heat flow rate per unit mass in comparison of Rectangular fin. For this reason we should be use Triangular fin. Aluminium material obtains larger value of heat flow rate per unit mass then Steel. Thus, Triangular fin is more suitable for space application. Analysis of the thermal characteristics of Straight Rectangular and parabolic fin using computationally as Altair Hyper Works software.
REFERENCES[1] E. Schmidt, Die Warmeubertragung durch Rippen, Z.
Ver. Dtsch. Inc. 70 (1926) 885–951.
[2] R. Duffin, A variational problem relating to cooling
fins, J. Math. Mech. 8 (1959) 47–56.
[3] C.Y. Liu, A variational problem with applications to
cooling fins, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 10 (1962) 19–27.
[4] C.J. Maday, The minimum weight one dimensional
straight fin, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 96 (1974) 161–165.
[5] A. Sonn, A. Bar-cohen, Optimum cylindrical pin fin,
ASME J. Heat Transfer 103 (1981)814–815.
[6] B.T.F. Chung, R.W. Kan, The optimum dimensions of
convective straight fins with profile curvature effect,
AIChE J. 83 (1987)77–83.
[7] A. Ullmann, H. Kalman, Efficiency and optimized
dimensions of annular fins of different cross-section
shapes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32 (1989) 1105–
1110
[8] Er. R.K. Rajput, (2010) Heat and Mass Transfer SI
UNITS, Fourth Edition,
[9] Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., “Fundamentals of
Heat and Mass Transfer", 5th Ed,
[10] M.M.Rathore, (2012) “Engineering Heat and mass
transfer”, 2nd Ed,