wade and tavris © 2005 prentice hall 10-1 invitation to psychology carol wade and carol tavris...

30
Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan Community College-Omaha

Upload: oswin-hood

Post on 28-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-1

Invitation To Psychology

Carol Wade and Carol TavrisPowerPoint Presentation by

H. Lynn BradmanMetropolitan Community College-Omaha

Page 2: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-2

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context

Page 3: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-3

Behavior in Social and Cultural Context

• Roles and Rules• Social Influences on Beliefs• Individuals in Groups• Us Versus Them: Group Identity• Group Conflicts and Prejudice

Page 4: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-4

Roles and Rules

Page 5: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-5

Roles and Rules

• The Obedience Study• The Prison Study• The Power of Roles

Page 6: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-6

The Obedience Study

• Stanley Milgram and coworkers investigated whether people would follow orders, even when the order violated their ethical standards.

• Most people were far more obedient than anyone expected.– Every single participant complied with at

least some orders to shock another person• Results are controversial and have generated

much research on violence and obedience.

Page 7: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-7

The Power of Roles

• Factors that cause people to obey– Allocating responsibility to the authority– Routinizing the task– Wanting to be polite– Becoming entrapped

• Entrapment: A gradual process in which individuals escalate their commitment to a course of action to justify their investment of time, money, or effort.

Page 8: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-8

Social Influences on Beliefs

Page 9: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-9

Social Influences on Beliefs

• Attributions• Attitudes

Page 10: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-10

Attributions

• Attribution Theory: – The theory that people are motivated to explain their own and other peoples’

behavior by attributing causes of that behavior to a situation or a disposition.• Fundamental Attribution Error:

– The tendency, in explaining other people’s behavior, to overestimate personality factors and underestimate the influence of the situation.

Page 11: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-11

Attitudes

• Attitude: – A relatively stable opinion containing

beliefs and emotional feelings about a topic.

• Validity Effect: – The tendency of people to believe that

a statement is true or valid simply because it has been repeated many times.

Page 12: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-12

Influencing Attitudes

Page 13: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-13

Coercive Persuasion

• Person is under physical or emotional duress.• Person’s problems are reduced to one simple

explanation, repeated often.• Leader offers unconditional love, acceptance,

and attention.• New identity based on group is created.• Person is subjected to entrapment.• Person’s access to information is controlled.

Page 14: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-14

Individuals in Groups

Page 15: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-15

Individuals in Groups

• Conformity• Groupthink• The Anonymous Crowd• Courage and Nonconformity

Page 16: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-16

A B CSample

No, it’snot hard!

Conformity

• Subjects in a group were asked to match line lengths.• Confederates in the group picked the wrong line.• Subjects went along with the wrong answer on 37% of

trials.

Page 17: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-17

Groupthink

• In close-knit groups, the tendency for all members to think alike and suppress disagreement for the sake of harmony.

• Symptoms of Groupthink:– Illusion of invincibility– Self-censorship– Pressure on dissenters to conform– Illusion of unanimity

Page 18: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-18

The Anonymous Crowd

• Diffusion of Responsibility: – In organized or anonymous groups,

the tendency of members to avoid taking responsibility for actions or decisions because they assume that others will do so.

• Deindividuation: – In groups or crowds, the loss of

awareness of one’s own individuality.

Page 19: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-19

Courage and Nonconformity

• Situational factors contributing to nonconformity:– You perceive the need for intervention or

help.– Situation makes it more likely that you will

take responsibility.– Cost-benefit ratio supports your decision to

get involved.– You have an ally.– You become entrapped.

Page 20: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-20

Us Versus Them: Group Identity

Page 21: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-21

Us Versus Them: Group Identity

• Ethnic Identity• Ethnocentrism• Stereotypes

Page 22: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-22

Ethnic Identity

• Social Identity: – The part of a person’s self-concept that is

based on identification with a nation, culture, or group or with gender or other roles in society.

• Ethnic Identity: – A person’s identification with a racial,

religious, or ethnic group.• Acculturation:

– The process by which members of minority groups come to identify with and feel part of the mainstream culture.

Page 23: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-23

Acculturation Strategies

Ethnic Identity is Strong Weak

Strong Bicultural Assimilated

Acc

ult

ura

tion

is

Weak Separatist Marginal

Page 24: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-24

Ethnocentrism

• The belief that one’s own ethnic group, nation, or religion is superior to all others.

Page 25: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-25

Robbers’ Cave Experiment

• Boys were randomly separated into two groups– “Rattlers” and

“Eagles”• Competitions fostered

hostility between the groups.

• Experimenters contrived situations requiring cooperation for success.

• Cross-group friendships increased.

Page 26: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-26

Stereotypes

• Stereotype: – A cognitive schema or a summary

impression of a group, in which a person believes that all members of the group share a common trait or traits (positive, negative, or neutral).

Page 27: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-27

Group Conflicts and Prejudice

Page 28: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-28

Group Conflicts and Prejudice

• The Origins of Prejudice• Varieties of Prejudice• Reducing Prejudice and Conflict

Page 29: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-29

Reducing Prejudice and Conflict

• Groups must have equal legal status, economic opportunities, and power.

• Authorities and community institutions must endorse egalitarian norms and provide moral support and legitimacy for both sides.

• Both sides must have opportunities to work and socialize together, formally and informally.

• Both sides must cooperate, working together for a common goal.

Page 30: Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall 10-1 Invitation To Psychology Carol Wade and Carol Tavris PowerPoint Presentation by H. Lynn Bradman Metropolitan

Wade and Tavris © 2005 Prentice Hall

10-30

Bridging the Cultural Divide

• Tips for Successful Travel:– Be sure you understand the other

culture’s rules, manners, and customs.– When in Rome, do as the Romans do

as much as possible.– Avoid stereotyping.