wharrad2007

37
RLO’s are good for Health! Heather Wharrad Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences

Upload: university-health-and-medical-librarians-group

Post on 01-Nov-2014

130 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wharrad2007

RLO’s are good for Health!

Heather WharradFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences

Page 2: Wharrad2007

What is an RLO?

Page 3: Wharrad2007

What is an RLO?

+ activity

+assessment

+ links

media assets instructional design

+ interactivity

Page 4: Wharrad2007

Characteristics of an RLO?

Based on a single learning objective

Defined educational need

No external dependencies

Context is minimised

Labelled with metadata

Can be packaged and delivered over a range of platforms

Page 5: Wharrad2007

Examples Glove Use

Advanced referencing with modified Harvard

Plasma Proteins

Meta-analysis

Page 6: Wharrad2007

Design principles

Page 7: Wharrad2007

EASA Finalist 2004 - Design of learning objects

Engage students with familiar everyday analogies

Page 8: Wharrad2007

Active student learning…..

Page 9: Wharrad2007

Visual Learning

Page 10: Wharrad2007

Scaffold student learning

Page 11: Wharrad2007

Learner preferences

Page 12: Wharrad2007

Rationale for Use

Page 13: Wharrad2007

The University of Nottingham School of Nursing

Page 14: Wharrad2007

Student Profile

Page 15: Wharrad2007

Life Before:

R L s

Page 16: Wharrad2007

CAL Packages:

Page 17: Wharrad2007

Students’ evaluations (CAL) ‘Can do it at own pace and in your own time- can go

back if unclear about anything, good for revision.’(cohort 1997)

‘CAL good presentation as lectures took a long time and concentration is lost.’(cohort 1995)

‘It’s hard staring at a screen for so long’(cohort 1997)

‘CAL packages in moderation are good because you have to find the answers yourself.’(cohort 1997)

(Student quotes from Wharrad et al 2000)

Page 18: Wharrad2007

Early lessons (lecturers)

Developing large packages – time, cost, updating

Wanted to use some sections but not all

Based on areas of student difficulty

Offer ‘added value’

Page 19: Wharrad2007

Nurse Prescribing Course -

A Case Study

Page 20: Wharrad2007

Nurse Prescribing Course -

- developed RLOs incorporating high quality graphics and audio to help students understand core pharmacology concepts

“We needed more time on each aspect [of Pharmacology] until factors were absorbed and understood!!”

“I have always struggled with ‘biology’ etc so its not the lecturers’ fault that I do not understand the sessions. I will revise at my own pace.”

Page 21: Wharrad2007

Pharmacology RLOsExploring the synapseFirst pass metabolismUnderstanding half lifeUnderstanding bioavailabilityThe lock & key hypothesisExcretion of drugs in the kidneyDrug metabolism in the liverAgonists and antagonistsDrugs acting at the synapsePlasma proteins in drug binding

Page 22: Wharrad2007

Understanding First pass metabolism

Very w ell

w ell

Neither w ell nor bad

Badly

Cou

nt20

10

0

COHORT

Cohort1(no RLO)

Cohort 2 (RLO)

Cohort 3 (RLO)

Students perceived understanding of pharmacology concepts on a nurse prescribing course.

Page 23: Wharrad2007

Strengths

PedagogicallyLed

DevelopmentProcess

Use and Reuse

LOeconomies

Evaluation

Page 24: Wharrad2007

Centre of Excellence in Teaching and Learning

For:Reusable Learning Objects

http:www.rlo-cetl.ac.uk

Page 25: Wharrad2007

The RLO-CETL is concerned with:

AAdvancing the pedagogical design of RLOs. BBuilding an RLO community for reuse. CConstructing staff development & rewards

DDisseminating the impact of RLOs EEvaluating RLOs as learning resources

Through an ambitious programme of development, research and collaboration.

Page 26: Wharrad2007

EB PracticePharmacologyClinical skillsStudy skills

GeneticsApplied MathsEngineeringStudy skills

Sports scienceStudy skillsBusiness studies

Languages

Page 27: Wharrad2007

Community of Use

MiniprojectsTeam-orientatedSupportedWorkshopsCommunication

Page 28: Wharrad2007

Team work!

Page 29: Wharrad2007

RLO Development

Page 30: Wharrad2007

The development process

Page 31: Wharrad2007

Development Stages -1

Production of a specification

Framing a proposal

Identified Educational needs

Page 32: Wharrad2007

RLO specification

Page 33: Wharrad2007

RLO specification

Page 34: Wharrad2007

Student-review at specificationand production stages

Quality Assurance

Peer-review at specificationand production stages

Technical review byMedia developers

Pedagogical review

Page 35: Wharrad2007

Storage,use & reuse of RLOs

Packaged Labelled Classified Stored

Page 36: Wharrad2007

Intralibrary:

Page 37: Wharrad2007

Summary – reuse and sustainability

RLO

Time

Number of RLOs

Community

Subject areasResearch methodsBiology

Sciences

Mental healthPaediatrics

Evidence-based practice

Social sciences

Health promotionEthics