what works? results from over 600 digital fundraising experiments

138
What Works in Online Fundraising What We Learned From Over 600 Online Fundraising Experiments presented by: &

Upload: virtuous-software

Post on 22-Mar-2017

161 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

What Works in Online Fundraising

What We Learned From Over 600 Online Fundraising Experiments

presented by:

&

Page 2: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Before we get startedo This presentation is being recorded

o Following the webinar the slides and recording will be emailed to youo All attendees have been mutedo If you have a question, please enter it in the Q&A box in your Zoom

webinar window

Page 3: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Virtuous is the nonprofit CRM helping charities create personal relationships, reduce costs and

maximize impact.

www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com

Scott RichardsDirector of Training & Customer SuccessVirtuous Software

Page 4: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

NextAfter is a fundraising research lab and consultancy that works with nonprofit organizations to help them better

understand their donors and inspire them to give generously.

www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com

Tim KachuriakChief Innovation and Optimization OfficerNextAfter

Page 5: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

NextAfter is obsessed with answering one question:

www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com

What makes donors give?

Page 6: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

To answer this question, NextAfter has conducted over

600 online fundraising

experiments with a cumulative lift of

25,677%

www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com

Page 7: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

What Works in Online FundraisingWhat We Learned From Over 600 Online

Fundraising Experiments

Page 8: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

First, an Experiment

(b) (c)(a)

Which Landing Page is Optimized?

Page 9: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

First, an ExperimentWhich Landing Page is Optimized?

121% increasein Donations

Page 10: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

First, an ExperimentWhich Landing Page is Optimized?

74% increasein Donations

Page 11: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Testing trumps marketing intuition.Key I SIGHT #1:

Page 12: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Best practices are not enough– you need a rigorous, scientific

methodology.

Page 13: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

And So Began My Quest…

Page 14: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Online Donor Funnel

Convert Site Visitors to Registered Users

Convert Site Visitors and Registered Users to

Donors Convert Donors to

Advocates

Interest

Involvement

Investme

nt

Page 15: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Nonprofit Industry Benchmarks

1% - 4% Donation Conversion Rate

0.15% Email Response Rate

Page 16: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Is the Funnel Leaking?

96% - 99.85%Failure Rate

Page 17: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Page 18: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

MECLABS is the largest optimization institution in the world.

Page 19: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

1,500+ major experimentsOver 1 billion emails tested10,000 sales-paths tested500,000 “decision-maker”

interviews5 million phone calls

100+ conferences/clinics

Page 20: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Over 10,000+ Paths Tested

Copyright © MECLABS

Page 21: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

g = 

9.81

 m/s

2

1. The funnel is often presented as one potentially useful analogy for marketing. It is in fact, the primary analogy. All marketing should influence a decision.

2. The funnel analogy distorts reality. People are not falling into your funnel, they are falling out. The funnel must be inverted.

3. People don’t travel down the center of the funnel. People are climbing up the sides.

A New Perspective of the Funnel

Copyright © MECLABS

Page 22: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

It’s not a donor funnel, it’s a donor mountain.

Key I SIGHT #2:

Page 23: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

The Donor Mountain

Page 24: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

The Donor Mountain

Page 25: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

The Donor Mountain

Page 26: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

The Donor Mountain

Page 27: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Email

Landing Page

Donation Process

Optimizing Each Micro-Yes

Page 28: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

ValueForce

CostForce

The Value Proposition

Page 29: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Email

Landing Page

Donation Process

CostForce

ValueForce

(Mi) NO

Optimizing Each Micro-Yes

Page 30: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Email

Landing Page

Donation Process

Value Force

Cost Force

(Mi) YES

Optimizing Each Micro-Yes

Page 31: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

My First Experiment

Page 32: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

My First ExperimentVersion A - Control

139% Increase in Clickthrough Rate42% Increase in Revenue

Version B - Test

Page 33: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Small Changes >> Big Impact

Optimized

Original

139% Increase in Clickthrough42% Increase in Revenue

Page 34: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Small changes, to the right elements,can produce BIG IMPACT.

Key I SIGHT #3:

Page 35: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Optimizing Email CaptureBUT ThisNOT This

42% increasein Email Signups

Page 36: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Optimizing Email Appeals BUT ThisNOT This

118% increasein donations

Page 37: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Optimizing the Process-Level Value Proposition

NOT This BUT This

133.7% increase in Email Signups

Page 38: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Optimizing Donation PagesNOT This BUT This

258.1% increasein Donations

Page 39: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

“How do we provoke a conversation about

optimization in the nonprofit space?”

Page 40: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Online Fundraising Scorecard• Study of 151 Nonprofit Organizations• Analysis of Four Key Functions

– Email Capture– Email Communication– Donation Pages– Gift Acknowledgement

• 46-Point Assessment• Based on MECLABS Optimization

Heuristics Download Full Study:nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 41: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Not All Verticals Perform the Same

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 42: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Most Organizations Prioritize Email Acquisition

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 43: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

“Why would I want to give you my email?”

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 44: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

“I can get a crappy newsletter anywhere!”

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 45: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Aggregate Donor Inbox: 51,364 Nonprofit Emails…and counting!

Page 46: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Question 1:

If I signed up to receive emails from an organization, what might I expect to receive in the first 30 days?

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 47: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 48: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Question 2: We’ve been talking about the importance of doing a Welcome Series for new email subscribers for almost a decade now. How many organizations are actually doing it?

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 49: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 50: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Question 3: How long after subscribing do organizations start asking for money?

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 51: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 52: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 53: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 54: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 55: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 56: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

“Mr. Owl, how many clicks does it take to get to the end of a donation form?”

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 57: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

65% require 3 or more clicks.

Download Full Study:   nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 58: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Friction kills online donations.Key I SIGHT #4:

Page 59: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Friction in the Online Giving Process: Defined

/ˈfrikSHən/ Noun.

Anything that causes psychological resistance to a given element in the online donation process.

Page 60: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Identifying types of friction in the online giving process.

Page 61: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Types of FrictionFsc = lT + dT ©

Copyright © MECLABS

Examples of Length (lT)• Page-Length

Friction• Steps Friction• Field Number

Friction• Field Layout

Friction

Examples of Difficulty (dT)• Decision Friction• Confusion Friction• Error Friction• Waiting Friction

Page 62: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Field Number FrictionA donation form with an

exorbitant number of fields adds unwanted friction to the giving process.

Page 63: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Field Layout FrictionA donation form that has

vertically aligned fields may be introducing additional mental cost or friction into the process.

Page 64: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Decision Friction

Unnecessary friction in the giving process is introduced when donors are forced to make unanticipated decisions about their donation.

Page 65: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Confusion FrictionUsing organization-centric language or “inside baseball,” or multiple conflicting calls to action elicits confusion that creates friction in the online giving process.

Page 66: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Error FrictionUsing cryptic error messages or requiring users to re-enter information adds significant friction to the online giving process.

Page 67: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Registration FrictionRequiring account

registration slows down the donation process by adding unnecessary friction to the online donation process.

Page 68: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Waiting FrictionWhen a page takes too long to load or makes the user have to wait to access the page, this adds unnecessary friction to the process.

Page 69: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Device FrictionHaving to “pinch and zoom” in order to make a donation on a mobile device adds friction to the mobile donation process.

Page 70: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Not Suitable for Smartphones

Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 71: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

How does form layout affect friction on a donation form?

Experiment #1007

Page 72: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Overview: CaringBridge.org CaringBridge is a website where people in a time of need can securely share updates, photos and videos, connecting with friends and family who care and want to help.

Over 500,000 people per day access this web site.

Page 73: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Donation Form Friction

Background:Client: CaringbridgePrimary donation form on the websiteDefault settings of the payment form had vertically aligned fields

Control

Page 74: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Donation Form FrictionTreatment

Treatment Changes:• Grouped similar fields

together to shorten donation form

• As a result of the grouping, reduced the width of several fields

Page 75: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Donation Form FrictionControl Treatment

39.4% increasein conversion rate

Page 76: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Donation Form Friction

Key Learning:Even though the horizontal field layout required the same

amount of data, it created the perception that less was required, thereby reducing friction and creating an increase of 39%. This is a great reminder that friction doesn’t exist on the page, it lives in the mind.

39.4% increase in conversion rate

Version Conv. Rate Relative Diff Stat ConfidenceC: Vertically Aligned 5.2%T1: Grouped Fields 7.2% 39.4% 100.0%

Page 77: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Your potential donor doesn’t fully understand

why they should give to you.

Key I SIGHT #5:

Page 78: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Only Half Communicate a Value Proposition

Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard

Page 79: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Why Did the Treatment Win?Control Treatment

74% increasein conversion rate

Page 80: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

(Mi)YES

Y

Headline

(Mi)YES

(Mi)YES

(Mi)YES

(Mi)YES

(Mi)YES

Communicating Value at Each Step

First Paragrap

h

Body Copy

Call-to-Action

Donation Form

Valu

e Pr

opos

itio

n Value Proposition

The

Mes

sage

Page 81: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

• Headline: Arrests attention   and introduces value proposition

• Bulleted Copy: Provides reasons why you should give

• Embedded Quotes: Bolsters credibility

• Call-to-Action: Restates the value proposition and clarifies exactly what the donor should do

Page 82: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

The Value Proposition Question

If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you, rather than some other

organization, or not at all?

Page 83: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

The Value Proposition Index Study

• Study of 127 nonprofit organizations across 8 different verticals

• Assessed the value proposition as communicated via four channels: Telephone Email Web site Social Media

• Value propositions scored in four areas based on research and methodology developed by MECLABS: Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity

• Data collected from 11/4/15 through 2/6/16

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 84: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Email Response Time is an Issue

Of the organizations that had a “Contact Us” form, more than one third did NOT respond to our submission…ever!

35%

65%

No Response Responded

Page 85: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 86: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form

26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 87: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form

26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

After 1 Week, 43% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry

Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 88: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form

26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

After 1 Week, 43% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry

After 1-month,35% of OrgsCompletely ignoredour request.

Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 89: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Social Media is not much better….

When we contacted organizations through direct message on Facebook, 33% never got back to us.

33%

67%

No Response Responded

Page 90: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

27% of Orgs had disabled direct messaging in Facebook and were uncontactable

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 91: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

27% of Orgs had disabled direct messaging in Facebook and were uncontactable

Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 92: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

After 1 Week, 36% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry

27% of Orgs had disabled direct messagingin Facebook and were uncontactable

Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 93: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request

After 1 Week, 36% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry

After 1-month,33% of OrgsCompletely ignoredour request.

27% of Orgs had disabled direct messagingin Facebook and were uncontactable

Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 94: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Scoring MatrixWebsite Email Phone Social MediaAppeal Appeal Appeal Appeal

Exclusivity Exclusivity Exclusivity Exclusivity Credibility Credibility Credibility Credibility

Clarity Clarity Clarity Clarity

Graded on a Scale of 1 to 5

< 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 >

Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp

Page 95: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Regardless of Vertical, Value Proposition Seems to be a Challenge

Christia

n Minist

ries

Col leges &

Universi

ties

Disaste

r & In

ternational R

elief

Disease

& H

eal th Service

s

Environment&

Wi ldl i f

e

Food Bank

Human & Socia

l Service

sOther

-

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

1.89

0.98

2.11 2.08 2.34 2.26 1.89 2.18

Value Proposition Index

B

D

A

C

F

C

F+

Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp

Page 96: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Aggregate Scores by Channel

After filtering out nonresponders, Social Media was the highest scoring channel followed by Email.

Website Email  Phone SocialMedia

 2.8  3.2   3.0 

 3.4 

 2.3 

 2.9   2.8   3.0  2.7 

 3.1  2.8   3.0 

 2.3 

 3.0   2.9  3.2 

Aggregate Value Proposition Scoring

Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity

Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp

Page 97: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Aggregate Scores by Channel

Somewhat surprising, was discovering that website was the poorest performing channel.

Website Email  Phone SocialMedia

 2.8  3.2   3.0 

 3.4 

 2.3 

 2.9   2.8   3.0  2.7 

 3.1  2.8   3.0 

 2.3 

 3.0   2.9  3.2 

Aggregate Value Proposition Scoring

Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity

Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp

Page 98: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Website Example #1

Page 99: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Website Example #2

Page 100: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Website Example #3

Page 101: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Optimizing Your Value Proposition

Page 102: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

How copy on a donation page affects the force of the value proposition.

Experiment ID: #111

Page 103: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Power of the Value Proposition

Background:Client: Senator John CornynPrimary donation page for JohnCornyn.comMinimal copy on the page

Control

Page 104: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Value Proposition Question

“If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you rather than some other

organization, or no one at all?”

Page 105: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Power of the Value PropositionTreatment

Treatment Changes:• Changed headline to

convey value• Added copy outlining

reasons why donors support the Senator.

• Included evidentials to back up each claim

Page 106: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Power of the Value PropositionControl Treatment

258.1% increasein conversion rate

Page 107: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Power of the Value Proposition

Version Conv. Rate

Relative Diff

Stat Confidence

C: No Value Prop 0.11%T1: Value Prop on Page 0.38% 258.1% 96.3%Key Learning:

There is a danger in assuming that your potential donor firmly graspsyour organization’s unique value proposition. By simply adding copyto the donation page to communicate value, we altered the force ofthe value proposition and conversion increased by 258%.

258.1% increase in conversion rate

Page 108: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

How increasing clarity affects the force of the value proposition.

Experiment ID: #900

Page 109: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Personalized Value Proposition Test

• Lack of copy assumes that the visitor is already motivated

• Lack of clarity assumes donor knows where the gift is going

Control

Page 110: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Personalized Value Proposition Test

• Copy is personalized to tribute page

• Copy also adds clarity around the relationship between the tribute, organization, and donor

Treatment

Page 111: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Personalized Value Proposition Test

Control Treatment

28.0% increase in conversion rate.

Page 112: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Personalized Value Proposition Test

28.0% increase in donor conversion

Version Conv. Rate Relative Diff

Stat Confidence

Control 3.6%Treatment 4.6% 28.0% 99.6%Key Learning:

By adding simple, personalized copy to the donation page, we improvedclarity which increased the force of the value proposition. As a result, donorconversion increased by 28%.

Page 113: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Increasing the force of the value propositionControl Treatment

127.6% increase in conversion rate.

Experiment ID: #294

Page 114: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

How the force of the value proposition can be altered with a radical redesign.

Experiment ID: #3793

Page 115: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Impact of Radical Redesign

Background:Client: Texas State Historical AssociationPrimary donation page for TSHAOnline.orgFour different membership options presentedCopy is not specific and makes unclear and unsubstantiated claims

Control

Page 116: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Value Proposition Question

“If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you rather than some other

organization, or no one at all?”

Page 117: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Impact of Radical Redesign Treatment

Treatment Changes:• Radical redesign with

long form copy to appropriately convey the value proposition

• Added copy outlining reasons why visitor should join the TSHA as a member

• Included evidentials to back up each claim

Page 118: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

• Headline arrests attention by conveying an exclusive offer

• First paragraph focuses on primary value proposition

Impact of Radical Redesign

Page 119: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

The value proposition is reinforced throughout the copy

Impact of Radical Redesign

Page 120: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Impact of Radical Redesign Control Treatment

146.5% increasein conversion rate

Page 121: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Impact of Radical Redesign

Version Conv. Rate

Relative Diff

Stat Confidence

C: Short Form 1.1%T1: Radical Redesign LF 2.6% 146.5% 100%Key Learning:

A radically different treatment is sometimes needed to get big increasesin conversion. By altering the page to more forcefully communicate acompelling argument that highlighted the exclusivity of membership, wewere able to increase donations by 146.5%.

146.5% increase in conversion rate

Page 122: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

How do I grow my online revenue?

Page 123: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

There are three key metrics that effect online revenue– and all of

them can be optimized!

Key I SIGHT #6:

Page 124: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

The Flux Capacitor of Revenue MaximizationTM

Page 125: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Exponential Impact of Optimization

Baseline 26.2% in one Area

26.2% in two areas

26.2% in three areas

Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200

Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34

Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00

Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%

Revenue = Traffic X Conversion Rate X Avg. Gift

Page 126: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Exponential Impact of Optimization

Baseline 26.2% in one Area

26.2% in two areas

26.2% in three areas

Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200

Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34

Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00

Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%

Page 127: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Exponential Impact of Optimization

Baseline 26.2% in one Area

26.2% in two areas

26.2% in three areas

Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200

Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34

Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00

Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%

Page 128: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Exponential Impact of Optimization

Baseline 26.2% in one Area

26.2% in two areas

26.2% in three areas

Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200

Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34

Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00

Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%

Page 129: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

Strategic FrameworkWhen it comes to increasing online revenue, there are three primary strategies:

Increase Traffic Get more of the (right) people to show up

Increase Conversion Rate Get more people to say, “Yes!”

Increase Average Gift Get more people to say “Heck yes!”

Page 130: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

3 Challenges

Page 131: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Challenge #1: Know Where You StandFCORM Report• Compare your

organization to industry benchmarks

• Identify your strengths

• Identify your weaknesses

Where are you leaking revenue?

Page 132: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Request a Free FCORM Report1. Go to:

NextAfter.com/FCORM

2. Answer the following three questions:

A. Average number of unique website visitors per month?

B. Average number of online donations per month?

C. Average online gift amount?

3. I will email you a FREE FCORM Report:

Page 133: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Challenge # 2: Give a Gift to Yourself1. Go to: NextAfter.com/Friction

2. Download the Online Donation Friction Self Assessment.

3. Go to your web site and give your organization a donation of any amount.

4. Complete the Friction Self Assessment as you go through the donation process.

Page 134: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

Challenge # 3: Launch an Experiment1. Create a hypothesis and design your

new treatment. Suggested areas to test:

a) Donation form/systemb) Headlinec) Body Copyd) Third Party Credibility

Indicators

2. Go to the NextAfter Research Library (nextafter.com/research) for inspiration and to validate and share your results.

3. Send me an email with your test idea ([email protected]), and I’ll help you set up your experiment.

Vs.

Page 135: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

onlineforlife.org

“Toothpaste is peddled with far more sophistication than all of the world’s life-saving causes.”

- Nick Kristof

Page 136: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

If you’d like to learn more about how Virtuous can help create personal relationships, reduce costs and maximize impact visit:

http://www.virtuouscrm.com/video-demowhere you can view a free 4-minute demo

Page 137: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com

Questions?

Page 138: What Works? Results from Over 600 Digital Fundraising Experiments

If you’d like to learn more about how Virtuous can help create personal relationships, reduce costs and maximize impact visit:

http://www.virtuouscrm.com/video-demowhere you can view a free 4-minute demo