what works? results from over 600 digital fundraising experiments
TRANSCRIPT
What Works in Online Fundraising
What We Learned From Over 600 Online Fundraising Experiments
presented by:
&
Before we get startedo This presentation is being recorded
o Following the webinar the slides and recording will be emailed to youo All attendees have been mutedo If you have a question, please enter it in the Q&A box in your Zoom
webinar window
Virtuous is the nonprofit CRM helping charities create personal relationships, reduce costs and
maximize impact.
www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com
Scott RichardsDirector of Training & Customer SuccessVirtuous Software
NextAfter is a fundraising research lab and consultancy that works with nonprofit organizations to help them better
understand their donors and inspire them to give generously.
www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com
Tim KachuriakChief Innovation and Optimization OfficerNextAfter
NextAfter is obsessed with answering one question:
www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com
What makes donors give?
To answer this question, NextAfter has conducted over
600 online fundraising
experiments with a cumulative lift of
25,677%
www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com
onlineforlife.org
What Works in Online FundraisingWhat We Learned From Over 600 Online
Fundraising Experiments
First, an Experiment
(b) (c)(a)
Which Landing Page is Optimized?
First, an ExperimentWhich Landing Page is Optimized?
121% increasein Donations
First, an ExperimentWhich Landing Page is Optimized?
74% increasein Donations
Testing trumps marketing intuition.Key I SIGHT #1:
Best practices are not enough– you need a rigorous, scientific
methodology.
onlineforlife.org
And So Began My Quest…
onlineforlife.org
Online Donor Funnel
Convert Site Visitors to Registered Users
Convert Site Visitors and Registered Users to
Donors Convert Donors to
Advocates
Interest
Involvement
Investme
nt
onlineforlife.org
Nonprofit Industry Benchmarks
1% - 4% Donation Conversion Rate
0.15% Email Response Rate
onlineforlife.org
Is the Funnel Leaking?
96% - 99.85%Failure Rate
onlineforlife.org
onlineforlife.org
MECLABS is the largest optimization institution in the world.
onlineforlife.org
1,500+ major experimentsOver 1 billion emails tested10,000 sales-paths tested500,000 “decision-maker”
interviews5 million phone calls
100+ conferences/clinics
onlineforlife.org
Over 10,000+ Paths Tested
Copyright © MECLABS
onlineforlife.org
g =
9.81
m/s
2
1. The funnel is often presented as one potentially useful analogy for marketing. It is in fact, the primary analogy. All marketing should influence a decision.
2. The funnel analogy distorts reality. People are not falling into your funnel, they are falling out. The funnel must be inverted.
3. People don’t travel down the center of the funnel. People are climbing up the sides.
A New Perspective of the Funnel
Copyright © MECLABS
It’s not a donor funnel, it’s a donor mountain.
Key I SIGHT #2:
onlineforlife.org
The Donor Mountain
onlineforlife.org
The Donor Mountain
onlineforlife.org
The Donor Mountain
onlineforlife.org
The Donor Mountain
onlineforlife.org
Landing Page
Donation Process
Optimizing Each Micro-Yes
onlineforlife.org
ValueForce
CostForce
The Value Proposition
onlineforlife.org
Landing Page
Donation Process
CostForce
ValueForce
(Mi) NO
Optimizing Each Micro-Yes
onlineforlife.org
Landing Page
Donation Process
Value Force
Cost Force
(Mi) YES
Optimizing Each Micro-Yes
onlineforlife.org
My First Experiment
onlineforlife.org
My First ExperimentVersion A - Control
139% Increase in Clickthrough Rate42% Increase in Revenue
Version B - Test
onlineforlife.org
Small Changes >> Big Impact
Optimized
Original
139% Increase in Clickthrough42% Increase in Revenue
Small changes, to the right elements,can produce BIG IMPACT.
Key I SIGHT #3:
onlineforlife.org
Optimizing Email CaptureBUT ThisNOT This
42% increasein Email Signups
onlineforlife.org
Optimizing Email Appeals BUT ThisNOT This
118% increasein donations
onlineforlife.org
Optimizing the Process-Level Value Proposition
NOT This BUT This
133.7% increase in Email Signups
onlineforlife.org
Optimizing Donation PagesNOT This BUT This
258.1% increasein Donations
onlineforlife.org
“How do we provoke a conversation about
optimization in the nonprofit space?”
Online Fundraising Scorecard• Study of 151 Nonprofit Organizations• Analysis of Four Key Functions
– Email Capture– Email Communication– Donation Pages– Gift Acknowledgement
• 46-Point Assessment• Based on MECLABS Optimization
Heuristics Download Full Study:nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Not All Verticals Perform the Same
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Most Organizations Prioritize Email Acquisition
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
“Why would I want to give you my email?”
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
“I can get a crappy newsletter anywhere!”
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Aggregate Donor Inbox: 51,364 Nonprofit Emails…and counting!
onlineforlife.org
Question 1:
If I signed up to receive emails from an organization, what might I expect to receive in the first 30 days?
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Question 2: We’ve been talking about the importance of doing a Welcome Series for new email subscribers for almost a decade now. How many organizations are actually doing it?
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Question 3: How long after subscribing do organizations start asking for money?
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
“Mr. Owl, how many clicks does it take to get to the end of a donation form?”
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
65% require 3 or more clicks.
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
Friction kills online donations.Key I SIGHT #4:
onlineforlife.org
Friction in the Online Giving Process: Defined
/ˈfrikSHən/ Noun.
Anything that causes psychological resistance to a given element in the online donation process.
onlineforlife.org
Identifying types of friction in the online giving process.
Types of FrictionFsc = lT + dT ©
Copyright © MECLABS
Examples of Length (lT)• Page-Length
Friction• Steps Friction• Field Number
Friction• Field Layout
Friction
Examples of Difficulty (dT)• Decision Friction• Confusion Friction• Error Friction• Waiting Friction
Field Number FrictionA donation form with an
exorbitant number of fields adds unwanted friction to the giving process.
Field Layout FrictionA donation form that has
vertically aligned fields may be introducing additional mental cost or friction into the process.
Decision Friction
Unnecessary friction in the giving process is introduced when donors are forced to make unanticipated decisions about their donation.
Confusion FrictionUsing organization-centric language or “inside baseball,” or multiple conflicting calls to action elicits confusion that creates friction in the online giving process.
Error FrictionUsing cryptic error messages or requiring users to re-enter information adds significant friction to the online giving process.
Registration FrictionRequiring account
registration slows down the donation process by adding unnecessary friction to the online donation process.
Waiting FrictionWhen a page takes too long to load or makes the user have to wait to access the page, this adds unnecessary friction to the process.
Device FrictionHaving to “pinch and zoom” in order to make a donation on a mobile device adds friction to the mobile donation process.
Not Suitable for Smartphones
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
onlineforlife.org
How does form layout affect friction on a donation form?
Experiment #1007
onlineforlife.org
Overview: CaringBridge.org CaringBridge is a website where people in a time of need can securely share updates, photos and videos, connecting with friends and family who care and want to help.
Over 500,000 people per day access this web site.
Donation Form Friction
Background:Client: CaringbridgePrimary donation form on the websiteDefault settings of the payment form had vertically aligned fields
Control
Donation Form FrictionTreatment
Treatment Changes:• Grouped similar fields
together to shorten donation form
• As a result of the grouping, reduced the width of several fields
Donation Form FrictionControl Treatment
39.4% increasein conversion rate
Donation Form Friction
Key Learning:Even though the horizontal field layout required the same
amount of data, it created the perception that less was required, thereby reducing friction and creating an increase of 39%. This is a great reminder that friction doesn’t exist on the page, it lives in the mind.
✓
39.4% increase in conversion rate
Version Conv. Rate Relative Diff Stat ConfidenceC: Vertically Aligned 5.2%T1: Grouped Fields 7.2% 39.4% 100.0%
Your potential donor doesn’t fully understand
why they should give to you.
Key I SIGHT #5:
Only Half Communicate a Value Proposition
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/scorecard
Why Did the Treatment Win?Control Treatment
74% increasein conversion rate
(Mi)YES
Y
Headline
(Mi)YES
(Mi)YES
(Mi)YES
(Mi)YES
(Mi)YES
Communicating Value at Each Step
First Paragrap
h
Body Copy
Call-to-Action
Donation Form
Valu
e Pr
opos
itio
n Value Proposition
The
Mes
sage
• Headline: Arrests attention and introduces value proposition
• Bulleted Copy: Provides reasons why you should give
• Embedded Quotes: Bolsters credibility
• Call-to-Action: Restates the value proposition and clarifies exactly what the donor should do
The Value Proposition Question
If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you, rather than some other
organization, or not at all?
The Value Proposition Index Study
• Study of 127 nonprofit organizations across 8 different verticals
• Assessed the value proposition as communicated via four channels: Telephone Email Web site Social Media
• Value propositions scored in four areas based on research and methodology developed by MECLABS: Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity
• Data collected from 11/4/15 through 2/6/16
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
Email Response Time is an Issue
Of the organizations that had a “Contact Us” form, more than one third did NOT respond to our submission…ever!
35%
65%
No Response Responded
Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form
26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form
26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
After 1 Week, 43% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry
Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
3% of Orgs did NOThave a “Contact Us”Form
26% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
After 1 Week, 43% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry
After 1-month,35% of OrgsCompletely ignoredour request.
Email: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
Social Media is not much better….
When we contacted organizations through direct message on Facebook, 33% never got back to us.
33%
67%
No Response Responded
Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
27% of Orgs had disabled direct messaging in Facebook and were uncontactable
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
27% of Orgs had disabled direct messaging in Facebook and were uncontactable
Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
After 1 Week, 36% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry
27% of Orgs had disabled direct messagingin Facebook and were uncontactable
Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
25% of Orgs responded within 48 hours of our request
After 1 Week, 36% of Orgsstill had NOTresponded toour inquiry
After 1-month,33% of OrgsCompletely ignoredour request.
27% of Orgs had disabled direct messagingin Facebook and were uncontactable
Social Media: How Long Does it Take to Respond?
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
Scoring MatrixWebsite Email Phone Social MediaAppeal Appeal Appeal Appeal
Exclusivity Exclusivity Exclusivity Exclusivity Credibility Credibility Credibility Credibility
Clarity Clarity Clarity Clarity
Graded on a Scale of 1 to 5
< 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 > < 1 - - - 5 >
Download Full Study:nextafter.com/vp
Regardless of Vertical, Value Proposition Seems to be a Challenge
Christia
n Minist
ries
Col leges &
Universi
ties
Disaste
r & In
ternational R
elief
Disease
& H
eal th Service
s
Environment&
Wi ldl i f
e
Food Bank
Human & Socia
l Service
sOther
-
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
1.89
0.98
2.11 2.08 2.34 2.26 1.89 2.18
Value Proposition Index
B
D
A
C
F
C
F+
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp
Aggregate Scores by Channel
After filtering out nonresponders, Social Media was the highest scoring channel followed by Email.
Website Email Phone SocialMedia
2.8 3.2 3.0
3.4
2.3
2.9 2.8 3.0 2.7
3.1 2.8 3.0
2.3
3.0 2.9 3.2
Aggregate Value Proposition Scoring
Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp
Aggregate Scores by Channel
Somewhat surprising, was discovering that website was the poorest performing channel.
Website Email Phone SocialMedia
2.8 3.2 3.0
3.4
2.3
2.9 2.8 3.0 2.7
3.1 2.8 3.0
2.3
3.0 2.9 3.2
Aggregate Value Proposition Scoring
Appeal Exclusivity Credibility Clarity
Download Full Study: nextafter.com/vp
Website Example #1
Website Example #2
Website Example #3
onlineforlife.org
Optimizing Your Value Proposition
onlineforlife.org
How copy on a donation page affects the force of the value proposition.
Experiment ID: #111
Power of the Value Proposition
Background:Client: Senator John CornynPrimary donation page for JohnCornyn.comMinimal copy on the page
Control
Value Proposition Question
“If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you rather than some other
organization, or no one at all?”
Power of the Value PropositionTreatment
Treatment Changes:• Changed headline to
convey value• Added copy outlining
reasons why donors support the Senator.
• Included evidentials to back up each claim
Power of the Value PropositionControl Treatment
258.1% increasein conversion rate
Power of the Value Proposition
Version Conv. Rate
Relative Diff
Stat Confidence
C: No Value Prop 0.11%T1: Value Prop on Page 0.38% 258.1% 96.3%Key Learning:
There is a danger in assuming that your potential donor firmly graspsyour organization’s unique value proposition. By simply adding copyto the donation page to communicate value, we altered the force ofthe value proposition and conversion increased by 258%.
✓
258.1% increase in conversion rate
onlineforlife.org
How increasing clarity affects the force of the value proposition.
Experiment ID: #900
Personalized Value Proposition Test
• Lack of copy assumes that the visitor is already motivated
• Lack of clarity assumes donor knows where the gift is going
Control
Personalized Value Proposition Test
• Copy is personalized to tribute page
• Copy also adds clarity around the relationship between the tribute, organization, and donor
Treatment
Personalized Value Proposition Test
Control Treatment
28.0% increase in conversion rate.
Personalized Value Proposition Test
28.0% increase in donor conversion
Version Conv. Rate Relative Diff
Stat Confidence
Control 3.6%Treatment 4.6% 28.0% 99.6%Key Learning:
By adding simple, personalized copy to the donation page, we improvedclarity which increased the force of the value proposition. As a result, donorconversion increased by 28%.
✓
Increasing the force of the value propositionControl Treatment
127.6% increase in conversion rate.
Experiment ID: #294
onlineforlife.org
How the force of the value proposition can be altered with a radical redesign.
Experiment ID: #3793
Impact of Radical Redesign
Background:Client: Texas State Historical AssociationPrimary donation page for TSHAOnline.orgFour different membership options presentedCopy is not specific and makes unclear and unsubstantiated claims
Control
Value Proposition Question
“If I am your ideal donor, why should I give to you rather than some other
organization, or no one at all?”
Impact of Radical Redesign Treatment
Treatment Changes:• Radical redesign with
long form copy to appropriately convey the value proposition
• Added copy outlining reasons why visitor should join the TSHA as a member
• Included evidentials to back up each claim
• Headline arrests attention by conveying an exclusive offer
• First paragraph focuses on primary value proposition
Impact of Radical Redesign
The value proposition is reinforced throughout the copy
Impact of Radical Redesign
Impact of Radical Redesign Control Treatment
146.5% increasein conversion rate
Impact of Radical Redesign
Version Conv. Rate
Relative Diff
Stat Confidence
C: Short Form 1.1%T1: Radical Redesign LF 2.6% 146.5% 100%Key Learning:
A radically different treatment is sometimes needed to get big increasesin conversion. By altering the page to more forcefully communicate acompelling argument that highlighted the exclusivity of membership, wewere able to increase donations by 146.5%.
✓
146.5% increase in conversion rate
onlineforlife.org
How do I grow my online revenue?
There are three key metrics that effect online revenue– and all of
them can be optimized!
Key I SIGHT #6:
The Flux Capacitor of Revenue MaximizationTM
Exponential Impact of Optimization
Baseline 26.2% in one Area
26.2% in two areas
26.2% in three areas
Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200
Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34
Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00
Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%
Revenue = Traffic X Conversion Rate X Avg. Gift
Exponential Impact of Optimization
Baseline 26.2% in one Area
26.2% in two areas
26.2% in three areas
Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200
Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34
Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00
Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%
Exponential Impact of Optimization
Baseline 26.2% in one Area
26.2% in two areas
26.2% in three areas
Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200
Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34
Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00
Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%
Exponential Impact of Optimization
Baseline 26.2% in one Area
26.2% in two areas
26.2% in three areas
Web Traffic 100,000 100,000 126,200 126,200
Conversion Rate 2.00% 2.52% 2.52% 2.52%Avg. Gift Value $70.00 $70.00 $70.00 $88.34
Revenue $140,000.00 $176,400.00 $222,617.00 $280,942.00
Change in Revenue 0% 26.2% 59.0% 100%
Strategic FrameworkWhen it comes to increasing online revenue, there are three primary strategies:
Increase Traffic Get more of the (right) people to show up
Increase Conversion Rate Get more people to say, “Yes!”
Increase Average Gift Get more people to say “Heck yes!”
onlineforlife.org
3 Challenges
onlineforlife.org
Challenge #1: Know Where You StandFCORM Report• Compare your
organization to industry benchmarks
• Identify your strengths
• Identify your weaknesses
Where are you leaking revenue?
onlineforlife.org
Request a Free FCORM Report1. Go to:
NextAfter.com/FCORM
2. Answer the following three questions:
A. Average number of unique website visitors per month?
B. Average number of online donations per month?
C. Average online gift amount?
3. I will email you a FREE FCORM Report:
onlineforlife.org
Challenge # 2: Give a Gift to Yourself1. Go to: NextAfter.com/Friction
2. Download the Online Donation Friction Self Assessment.
3. Go to your web site and give your organization a donation of any amount.
4. Complete the Friction Self Assessment as you go through the donation process.
onlineforlife.org
Challenge # 3: Launch an Experiment1. Create a hypothesis and design your
new treatment. Suggested areas to test:
a) Donation form/systemb) Headlinec) Body Copyd) Third Party Credibility
Indicators
2. Go to the NextAfter Research Library (nextafter.com/research) for inspiration and to validate and share your results.
3. Send me an email with your test idea ([email protected]), and I’ll help you set up your experiment.
Vs.
onlineforlife.org
“Toothpaste is peddled with far more sophistication than all of the world’s life-saving causes.”
- Nick Kristof
If you’d like to learn more about how Virtuous can help create personal relationships, reduce costs and maximize impact visit:
http://www.virtuouscrm.com/video-demowhere you can view a free 4-minute demo
www.VirtuousCRM.com | www.NextAfter.com
Questions?
If you’d like to learn more about how Virtuous can help create personal relationships, reduce costs and maximize impact visit:
http://www.virtuouscrm.com/video-demowhere you can view a free 4-minute demo