what’s the environment got to do with it? · what’s the environment got to do with it? michael...

40
What’s the environment got to do with it? Michael Parry, MD, FACP, FIDSA, FSHEA Thomas Jay Bradsell Chair of Infectious Diseases, Stamford Hospital Professor of Clinical Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

Upload: trinhthien

Post on 05-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

What’stheenvironmentgottodowithit?

MichaelParry,MD,FACP,FIDSA,FSHEAThomasJayBradsell ChairofInfectiousDiseases,StamfordHospital

ProfessorofClinicalMedicine,ColumbiaUniversityCollegeofPhysiciansandSurgeons

GoldenRulesofInfectionPrevention

hand hygiene

environmentalhygiene

engineered processes of care

HandHygiene

Bundleimplementation(SSIprevention)• Pharmacologic

– Mechanicalbowelprep– Oralantibioticsthedaypriortosurgery(Correctdrugs,doses)– Prophylacticintravenousantibiotics(Appropriateselection,timing,re-

dosing,postoplimitation)• NonPharmacologic

– Preoperativeshowers– Appropriatehairclipping– Appropriateskinprep– Maintainbodytemperature– Postoperativeoxygenation– Laparoscopicwhenpossible

• Technical– Reduceintraoperativecontamination-- minimizespillage– Maintain“clean”areasseparatefromcontaminated– Changegloves,gowns,suction,bovie tip– Protectsuperficialwound– Recognizehighrisksituations-- Delayedprimaryclosure

• Systematic– Time-out– Checklist– Debriefingform– Quarterlydatareview

6

Contaminatedsurfaces

• 70%ofsurfacesincolonizedpatients’roomsarecontaminatedwithMRSAorVREorC.difficile.– Countertops– Bedrails– Equipment– Telephone,callbutton

• MorethanhalfthepatientswhobecamecolonizedwithMRSAafterenteringtheICUacquireastrainNOT presentonotherpatientsthereatthetime.

• Oncecaregiverstouchthesesurfaces,theirhandsorglovesarecontaminated.

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (v. 9, 1997) 622-627.Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (v.20.2, 2006).

7

SurvivalofMulti-drug-resistantOrganismsintheEnvironment

• DurationofsurvivalofMRSAindryconditions– Plasticcharts=11days– Laminatedtabletop=12days– Clothcurtains=9days

• EnvironmentalsurvivalofVRE– Upholstery,furnitureandwallcoverings=7days

• SurvivalofClostridiumdifficile– Months

Huang et al, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1267-1269Lankford et al, Am J Infect Control2006;34:258-263

8

Contamination of Computer Keyboards

Beforecleaning

Aftercleaning

Keyboards,Telephones,Equipment–allharborStaph,Strep,andotherPathogens

9

Manypersonneldon’trealizewhentheyhavemicroorganismsontheirhands

Nurses,doctorsandotherhealthcareworkerscangetthousandsofbacteriaontheirhandsbydoingsimpletasks,like

• pullingpatientsupinbed• takingabloodpressureorpulse• touchingapatient’shand• rollingpatientsoverinbed• touchingthepatient’sgownorbedsheets• touchingequipmentlikebedsiderails,over-bedtables,IVpumps

Cultureplateshowinggrowthofbacteria24hoursafterhandplacedontheagarplate

10

RoleofasymptomaticcarriageofCdifficile inpatientsataLTCFRiggs,etal.ClevelandClinic,2007.

• 68asymptomaticpatientsinLTCF• 51%carriersofC.difficile

– 49%ofthesehadNAP-1strain

• Carriershadhighskin(61%)carriage– versus70%inCDIcases

• Carriershadhighenvironmental(59%)contamination– Versus70%inCDIcasesand20%innon-carriers

• PriorCDIandrecent(<3mo)antibioticusewasassociatedwithcarriage

• 20%ofcarriersdevelopedCDIover4mofollow-up

11

Wherearethegerms?

12

Wherearethegerms?

13

14

TheChallenge:tocreateaneffectiveenvironmentalhygieneprogram

• CleaningPolicies&Procedures– Everyone’sjob!– Dailycleaningandterminalcleaning– Hightouchsurfacesfocus– Equipmentcleaning– “Rollingstock”management– Unitcorecleaning

• Staffneededucationonanongoingbasis.• Checklistforroomcleaning• Roomturn-overtimeforanisolationpatienttakes

approximately45-60minutes.• Staffshouldberoutinelyevaluatedonperformance

– DirectandClandestineobservation

15

ElementsoftheInterdisciplinaryCleaningandDisinfectionInitiative

• ProgramimplementedOctober,2005• Useofafluorescentmarkertodetect

surfacecleaning• Collaborativeevaluationofcleaningprocess• Nursingserviceperformedcleaning

assessments• Ongoingevaluationofeffectiveness

– Groupfeedbacktohousekeepingdepartmentatlarge

– Personalfeedbackonindividualperformancetomanager

• Incorporationintoperformancemanagementprocess

16

EnvironmentalSitesTesting

• Toiletseat• Toilethandle• Toilethandhold• Sink• Sinkfaucethandle• BRdoorknob• BRlightswitch• Telephone• TVcontrol/callswitch• Siderails• Traytable• Bedsidetable• Chairhandrail• Roomdoorknobs

18

EnvironmentalCleaningSHOverallProgress

Percentofsurfacescleaned

19

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

perc

ent c

lean

ed

Percent of surfaces cleaned 10/12 to 6/15

IncidenceofHospital-acquiredClostridiumdifficile Infection.

Leffler DA, Lamont JT. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1539-1548

DifficultiesincontrollingthespreadofC.difficile

• Highcommunityprevalence– especiallyLTAC(30-50%);SNF(10-20%);community(3-6%)

• Difficultypreventinginfectioninhighrisksettings– “incidentdensity”pressure– carriers+ill

• Hospital“onset”versushospital“acquisition”• Antibioticuseandthemicrobiome

– necessaryandunnecessary– breadthandlengthandtypeofrx

• Prevalenceofacidsuppressiontherapy– VAPprevention;otherordersets

• Prolongedfecalandskincarriage– Clinicallysuccessfultreatmentdoesn’teradicatethespore

• Frequentrecurrence– Treatment,ageandimmunocompetence dependent

• Persistenceofsporesintheenvironment– Resistancetogermicides– Patientingestion

21

22

PersistenceofC.difficileDuringandAfterTreatment

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Prior to treatment Day 3 of treatment Resolution of diarrhea

End of treatment 1-6 weeks after treatment

Perc

ent P

ositi

ve

Percentage of positive cultures for C. difficile before, during, and after treatment

Stool Skin Environment

Wafa Al Nassir, et al. Cleveland VA. ICHE, 2010

26

StamfordHospital-acquiredC.difficile

27

C.difficile bundle• Environmentalcleaningprogram• Bleach/peracetic acidprogram• Dailyandterminalcleaning• IsolationforCdiff

– GownandGlove– Soapandwater– Durationofhospitalization

• Rapiddetection– PCR– Isolatefordiarrhea– Readmissionflag

• Dedicatedequipment– Yellowstethoscopes;disposableBPcuffs,thermometers,etc– Norectaltemperatures

• Treatmentinitiatives– vancomycinandfidaxomycin• PPIreductioninitiative• Antibioticstewardshipprogram• Fecaltransplantationprogram• NewHospitalinitiatives

TheNewStamfordHospital

Whathelpisonthehorizon?

• Antimicrobialsurfaceengineering– Copper,silver– Nanotechnology– Fabrics(curtains,scrubs,linens)

• UVlightandotherlighttechnologies• Aerosols• Focusonthemicrobiome

– Fecaltransplantation– Syntheticstool– Alternativetreatmentmodalities

• Focusontheimmunesystem– Monoclonalantibodies– Immunization

MicrobialLoadonEnvironmentalSurfaces:TheRelationshipBetweenReducedEnvironmentalContaminationandReductionofHealthcare-AssociatedInfections(TheBETRDisinfectionStudy)

IDWEEKAbstract262,2016

WILLIAMRUTALA,etalUniversityofNorthCarolinaHealthCare,ChapelHill,NC

Background:Disinfectionofnoncriticalenvironmentalsurfacesandequipmentisanessentialcomponentofinfectionpreventionassurfacesmaycontributetocross-transmissionofepidemiologicallyimportantpathogens(EIPs).

Results: Enhanceddisinfectioninterventions(i.e.,Quat/UV,Bleach,Bleach/UV)weresignificantlysuperiortoaQuat aloneinreducingEIPs.

Conclusion:Comparisonofthebeststrategywiththeworststrategy(i.e.,Quat vsQuat/UVorBleach/UV)revealedthatareductionof>90%inEIPsledtoa35%decreaseinsubsequentpatientcolonization/infection.Ourdatademonstratedthatadecreaseinroomcontaminationwasassociatedwithadecreaseinsubsequentpatientcolonization/infection.

AntimicrobialActivityofaContinuousVisibleLightDisinfectionSystem

IDWEEKAbstract267,2016

WILLIAMRUTALAandDANIELSEXTON,etal.UniversityofNorthCarolina,ChapelHill,NCandDukeUniversityMedicalCenter,Durham,NC

Background:Anoverheadlightfixturetechnology,whichcontinuouslyandsafelydisinfectstheenvironmentwasassessedtodeterminetheeffectivenessforthereductionofEIP. Thistechnologycreatesanarrowbandwidthofhigh-intensityvisiblebluelightwithapeakoutputof405nmthatgeneratesreactiveoxygenspeciesandkillsmicroorganisms.

Results:Theseresultsdemonstratedthatthe405nmlightinactivatedthreevegetativebacteria(MRSA,VRE,MDRA)onsurfaceswithcontacttimesof1-96hr.Statisticaldifferences(p<0.05)wereobservedusingbluelightforVREat24hr,forMRSAat3-7hr,forMDRAat5-24hr,andforC.difficile sporesat5hrand72hr.Theinactivationwasmoresignificantwhenthesurfaceirradiancewasincreasedbyaddingthebluelight.

Conclusion: Highintensitylighttechnologycouldbeconsideredforseveralhealthcaredecontaminationapplications

ReducedHealthcareAssociatedInfectionsinanAcuteCareCommunityHospitalusingaCombinationofSelf-DisinfectingCopper-ImpregnatedCompositeHardSurfacesandLinens

IDWEEKAbstract263,2016

COSTISIFRI,MD,KYLEENFIELD,MDandGENEBURKEMD.UniversityofVirginiaHealthSystemandSentaraHealthcare,Norfolk,VA

Background:Effortstodecreaseenvironmentalbioburden areassociatedwithreducedtransmissionofmicrobialpathogensanddevelopmentofHAIs.Copperoxidehaspotentbiocidal activity.Herewereporttheresultstrialofacopperoxide-impregnatedcompositeproductincorporatedintohospitalcountertops,moldedsurfaces,patientgownsandlinens.

Results:Thestudywasconductedovera25.5-monthtimeperiod.HAIratesobtainedfromthecopper-containingnewtower(72beds;14,479patient-days)andtheunmodifiedhospitalwing(84beds;19,177patient-days)werecomparedtothosefromthebaselineperiod(204beds;46,391patient-days).Thenewtowerhad78%(P=.023)fewerhealthcare-associatedinfectionsduetoMDROsorC.difficile ,83%(P=.048)fewercasesofC.difficile infection,and68%(P=.252)fewerinfectionsduetoMDROsrelativetothebaselineperiod.Nochangesinratesofhealthcare-associatedinfectionswereobservedintheunmodifiedhospitalwing.

Conclusion:Copperoxide-impregnatedcompositehardsurfacesandlinensmaybeusefultechnologiestopreventhealthcare-associatedinfectionsintheacutecarehospitalsetting.

TheAntisepticScrubContaminationandTransmission(ASCOT)TrialtoDeterminetheImpactofAntiseptic-

ImpregnatedScrubsonHealthcareWorkerContaminationIDWEEKAbstract1351,2016

DEVERICKANDERSON,MDetal.DukeInfectionControlOutreachNetwork,DukeUniversityMedicalCenter,Durham,NC

Background:HCPclothingbecomescontaminatedduringpatientcareandcanserveasavectorforsubsequenttransmission. Antimicrobial-impregnatedclothingmayreducecontamination,butclinicaldataarelacking.

Methods:Scrubsimpregnatedwith(1)acomplexelementcompoundwithasilver-alloy,or(2)anorganosilane-basedquaternaryammoniumandahydrophobicfluoroacrylate copolymeremulsion,werecomparedtotostandardcotton-polyscrubsduringclinicalcare

Results:167uniquepatientsreceivedcarefrom40nursesubjectsover120individualshifts.2,185cultureswereobtainedfromHCPclothing,455frompatients,and2,919frompatients’environments. Themedianunadjustedincreasesincontaminationweresimilaramongscrubtypes.ScrubtypewasnotassociatedwithadecreaseinHCPclothingcontamination.

Conclusion:Antimicrobial-impregnatedscrubsdidnotleadtodecreasedcontaminationofnursesclothing.

AreAntimicrobialCurtainsasCleanasYouThink?IDWEEKAbstract260,2016

SHELASRIAR,MD,etal.MedicalCollegeofWisconsin,Milwaukee,WI,

Background:Weaimedtodeterminethedegreeofbacterialcontaminationonantimicrobialcurtainswithinourmedicalintensivecareunit(ICU).

Results:Wefoundthatoutof20curtains,95%(n=19)showedbacterialgrowth.Outofthe10doorcurtains50%(n=5)showedGram-negativebacilliand100%(n=10)hadGram-positiveorganisms.Outofthe10commodecurtains,10%(n=1)showedGram-negativeorganismsand90%(n=9)hadGram-positiveorganisms

Conclusion:Antimicrobialcurtainsarecontaminatedwithpathogenicorganisms;therefore,theyshouldbethoroughlydisinfected,exchanged,ortotallyforegoneinbetweenpatients.

Thankyou!

Questions?