when should you die what would a vulcan do · mqaa 23 mqaa = the point in time at which the...
TRANSCRIPT
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
WHEN SHOULD YOU DIE – WHAT WOULD A VULCAN DO
Daniël Erasmus
Insight Actuaries and Consultants
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Innovations
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87
Age
Heart Valve Replacements
Robotic surgery
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 20177
Are we heading for a maximum?
What does an aging population do?
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Slowing improvements
8
Source: STATCAN Data
Source: STATCAN Data, RGA
Canadian Life Expectancy
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Defining Quality
Can be considered in the context of a lemon event
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Pillars of quality
12
HealthFinancial Stability
Functional & Relational
• Significant
contributor
• Well defined
• Relatively easy to
measure and
generalisable
• Variable and
highly subjective
• Country and
cultural specific
• Key driver in
longevity and
quality
• Priced in for
longevity?
• New research
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Health Event Data
14
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
600%
700%
15 -
20
20 -
25
25 -
30
30 -
35
35 -
40
40 -
45
45 -
50
50 -
55
55 -
60
60 -
65
65 -
70
70 -
75
75 -
80
80+
As
% o
f A
ve
rag
e
Major Medical Claims Curves
Female Male
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82
DRG Related Claims Analysis
“Lemon events”
Female Male
15 -
20
20 -
25
25 -
30
30 -
35
35 -
40
40 -
45
45 -
50
50 -
55
55 -
60
60 -
65
65 -
70
70 -
75
75 -
80
80+
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
Sources: Insight Data
Age Age
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Disease Data
15
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
15 -
20
20 -
25
25 -
30
30 -
35
35 -
40
40 -
45
45 -
50
50 -
55
55 -
60
60 -
65
65 -
70
70 -
75
75 -
80
80+
As
% o
f A
ve
rag
e
Chronic Claims Curves
Female Male
-
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
Ra
te p
er
10,0
00 liv
es
Disease Based Diagnoses Rates per
10'000
Males Females
15 -
20
20 -
25
25 -
30
30 -
35
35 -
40
40 -
45
45 -
50
50 -
55
55 -
60
60 -
65
65 -
70
70 -
75
75 -
80
80+
Sources: Insight Data, Extending the Critical Path (Staple Inn Actuarial Society),
Working Paper 89 (IFA), RGA Data
Age Age
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 201716
15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80+
Mental Health Data
• Diagnoses rates SA
private medical
scheme market
• Incidence rates from
developed countries
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
Age
Mental Illness Incidence Rates
Famales Males
Sources: Insight Data, Extending the Critical Path (Staple Inn Actuarial Society),
Working Paper 89 (IFA), RGA Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 201718
A race against time
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103
Ratio V
alu
es
Age
Income sustianiability - low Income sustianiability - medium Income sustianiability - high Financial destitution index
Financial Stability
Sources: Insight Data, STATS SA, RGA
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 201719
Functional and Relational
Availability of key
relationships
Ability to access
relationships
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Functional and Relational
20
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
18
22
26
30
34
38
42
46
50
54
58
62
66
70
74
78
82
86
90
94
98
10
2
10
6
11
0
11
4
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
Axis Title
Relational Risk Factors
Male NS married to Female S Male S married to Female NS
Female S married to Male NS Female S married to Male S
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
18
23
28
33
38
43
48
53
58
63
68
73
78
83
88
93
98
103
108
113
118
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
Age
Functional Impairment Risk Factors
Female NS Female S Male NS Male S
Sources: Insight Data, Extending the Critical Path (Staple Inn Actuarial Society), RGA Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
Ris
k R
ate
s
Age
Scenario - Main Risk Rates by Age
Health Index Financial Stability Functional and Relational
Designing a Quality Index
21 Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Designing a Quality Index
22
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
Indexed V
alu
es
Age
Indexed Values
Health Index Financial Stability Functional and Relational
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
18 28 38 48 58 68 78 88 98 108 118
Ind
ex
Age
Quality Ajusted Index
MQAA
23
MQAA = the point in time at which the permanent decline in quality of life within 1
time year is deemed to be permanent, significant and increasing in terms of velocity.
Decay function> 25
MQAA
QAAI
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
10
1
10
3
10
5
QA
AI
De
ca
y F
un
ctio
n V
alu
es
Age
QAAI Decay Function
MQAA
24
Risk factor
considered as
P(survival past this
point given
survival to
age ex)
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104
Functional Example – Leonard aged 35
25
Expected age at death = 79
MQAA = 85
Risk factor 34%
Age at the time of assessment =
35
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Functional Example – Leonard aged 35
26
Age at death
79 83
85 86
MQAA
VS.
Additional life
years
8%BUT
9% Increase in risk factor
32%
17% 15%
18%
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Influencing the key drivers
27
Mortality and quality
improvements are not
linear
Sources: RGA, Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
Age
Mortality Improvements vs. QAAI
STD MS MS with 15% improvement MS with 30% improvement
Inc
ide
nc
e R
ate
QAAI St rates QAAI 15% impact QAAI 30% impact
MS
Decay QAAI Decay QAAI 15%
Improvement
Decay QAAI 30%
Improvement
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Functional Example – Leonard aged 35
28
“Live long and prosper”…
Consider data and minimise personal longevity risk, so why do we not consider this?
Leonard Nimoy “Spock”
26 March 1931 – 27 February 2015
Age 83…
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 201729
MQAA Implications
Death
Disease
Financial Wellbeing
Inability to be self
sufficiency
Legacy
Dependents being left destitute
Ill health
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 2017
Bending the Curve
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
DF V
alu
es
Age
QAAI Decay Function
Imperative to
increase MQAA
Sources: Insight Own Calculations – Referenced Source Data
Actuarial Society 2017 Convention 17-18 October 201731
Implications
Considering longevity in isolation and as a net good at all times is potentially
harmful to your health (and future client retention strategy…)