whose income and whose value? shyam sunder, yale university rethinking capitalism bruce initiative...

21
Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April 7-9, 2011 03/25/22 1 Sunder: Income and Value

Upload: josephine-conley

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Whose Income and Whose Value?

Shyam Sunder, Yale UniversityRethinking Capitalism

Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz

April 7-9, 2011

04/18/23 1Sunder: Income and Value

Page 2: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Capitalism?• Some dictionary definitions:• an economic system in which investment in and ownership

of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals and corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

• …an an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit.

• …characterized by a free market for goods and services and private control of production and consumption.

• …characterized by the freedom of capitalists to operate or manage their property for profit in competitive conditions

• …political/economic system which encourages capitalists

04/18/23 2Sunder: Income and Value

Page 3: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Why Do We Call It Capitalism?

• One possibility, rarely discussed:• Because we choose to do accounting from the

point of view of the supplier of financial capital

• Look at the accounts and financial reports as currently prepared

• Let us look at an example

04/18/23 3Sunder: Income and Value

Page 4: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Income Statement (in millions, except per share amounts)Year Ended June 30, (Audited)

2010 2009 2008Revenue$62,484$58,437$60,420Operating expenses:Cost of revenue 12,395 12,155 11,598Research and development 8,714 9,010 8,164Sales and marketing 13,214 12,879 13,260General and administrative 4,004 3,700 5,127Employee severance 59 330 -Total operating expenses 38,386 38,074 38,149Operating income24,09820,36322,271Other income (expense) 915 (542) 1,543Income before income taxes 25,013 19,821 23,814Provision for income taxes 6,253 5,252 6,133Net income $ 18,760 $ 14,569 $ 17,681Cash dividends declared

per common share$0.52 $ 0.52 $ 0.44

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT)

04/18/23 4Sunder: Income and Value

Page 5: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Our Accounting Model• Accounting reports are modeled for the capitalist

perspective of the firm• Treats all factors of production (other than the equity

capital) as costs • Focus on net income to the shareholder

– Residual income would subtract the cost of equity capital focuses on surplus

• Corresponding focus on shareholder value as the stock variable of interest

• This accounting choice has consequences• It not only determines the data we have but also shapes

the nature of discourse on the performance and consequences of the economic system

• Harder to talk about things we do not have data about

04/18/23 5Sunder: Income and Value

Page 6: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Imagine an Alternative• Look at the enterprise from the points of view of

all factors of production simultaneously• Measure contribution of resources from each

agent (opportunity cost of resources supplied)• Measure outflow of resources to each agent

– Income of each agent is the difference of his/her receipts and contributions

– The sum of this income across all agents is the wealth generated by by the enterprise

– Capitalize the individual and aggregate flows to determine value to individuals and in aggregate

04/18/23 6Sunder: Income and Value

Page 7: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 7

Accounting for Enterprise Resource Flows

Page 8: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

What Do We Know from Microsoft Accounts?

Agents Contribution (opportunity cost)

Receipts Income or share of surplus

Customer 63 ? ?

Vendors and ?

Labor (combined) 38 ?

Government ? 6 ?

Shareholders/Cred. ? 19 ?

04/18/23 8Sunder: Income and Value

Page 9: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

National Income Accounts• National income may be defined provisionally as the

net total of commodities and services (economic goods) produced by the people comprising a nation;

• As the total of such goods received by the nation’s individual members in return for their assistance in producing commodities and services;

• As the total of goods consumed by these individuals out of the receipts thus earned, or

• As the net total of desirable events enjoyed by the same individuals in their double capacity as producers and consumers. Simon Kuznets

04/18/23 9Sunder: Income and Value

Page 10: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Effect of National Income Accounts on Perspectives and Management of National Economies

• “…National income is the end product of a country’s economic activity, reflecting the combined play of economic forces and serving to appraise the prevailing economic organization in terms of its returns.”

• Development of national income accounting and its implementation by Simon Kuznets in the twentieth century, transformed how we think about and manage national economy

• Let us think about the limitations of financial reporting and its possible transformation

04/18/23 10Sunder: Income and Value

Page 11: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Extensive Income and Value

• Extensive income (and value) as the sum of:• To the shareholders• To customers• To Vendors• To employees• To creditors• To government• To community, etc.

– Inducement from the firm – O.C. of contributions

04/18/23 11Sunder: Income and Value

Page 12: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Income/Value to Investors

• Residual income and corresponding shareholder value created

• Focus of current financial reports• Apply similar perspective to other participants

in the firm

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 12

Page 13: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Income/Value to Customers• Customer’s “investment” in the form in the form of

search, learning, negotiation, payments, settlement of disputes

• Expected PV of benefits from goods received should exceed the PV of investments

• Includes immediate transaction as well as the consequences of the transaction for resource flows associated with any future transactions (reduction in time, cost, search etc. for later transactions)

• In a perfect product market, consumer’s surplus from the firm is zero (may be +ve from industry, and the economy)

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 13

Page 14: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Value to Government• Various levels of government provide mostly non-

priced services plus some priced goods• Resources from taxation• Value of the firm to the government from providing

priced services is the same as for vendors• Value of the firm to the government from providing

non-priced services is taxes plus fees minus O.C. of resources spent on providing services

• Major challenge to put this into practice

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 14

Page 15: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Value of the Firm to Community

• Local, national and global• Most exchanges in form of externalities• Value of the firm to the community is the sum

of net externalities plus the net payments

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 15

Page 16: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Justification for Shareholder Value Criterion

• Assume neoclassical model of the firm (all surplus goes to the owner, income/value to all other agents is zero both before and after the event): no need to calculate and report the effects on any other class of agents

• Capital markets are said to be efficient, at least more perfect than the other factor markets

• Contradiction between the two assumptions

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 21

Page 17: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Who Gets the Goodies?• Agents who transact in relatively perfect markets

might be expected to obtain prices closer to their O.C.

• U.S. capital markets said to be more perfect than others

• Suppliers of capital should be expected to get close to their O.C.

• Surplus/value of the firm should accrue mostly to agents who transact through less perfect markets

• Yet, we tend to assume that the surplus goes to the shareholders

• At least that is how we do our accounting

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 22

Page 18: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Need Analysis of Extensive Income and Values

• For policy, need analysis of income/values to all participating agents, not limited to shareholders

• Would not have the data without analysis of extensive income/value of the firm

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 24

Page 19: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Use of Shareholder Value As Guide for Policy

• What is the theoretical justification for using shareholder value for policy

• Law of the Instrument (Kaplan): Use whatever data is available

• Extensive income/value measures are currently unavailable

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 25

Page 20: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Concluding Remarks

• Income and value concepts driven by the perspective of capital alone have their limitations, and contradictions

• For important classes of policy matters, we may need extensive concepts of income and value

• Lessons from national income accounting

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 26

Page 21: Whose Income and Whose Value? Shyam Sunder, Yale University Rethinking Capitalism Bruce Initiative at the University of California at Santa Cruz April

Thank [email protected]

www.som.yale.edu/faculty/sunder

04/18/23 Sunder: Income and Value 27