wl/ibb/e - unt digital library/67531/metadc... · process [6] and the transient collisional...
TRANSCRIPT
,* /WL/ibb/e.Ha2ba
SIMULATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL AND NONLINEAR HARMOyCOUTPUT FROM AN FEL AMPLIFIER WITH A SOFT X-RAY SEED L
S. G. Biedron~, H. P. FreundTT, Y. Li, and S.V. Milton 4&6‘e~~Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne Illinois 60439 e~8JJ$@4 ~
,“h
Abstract
A single-pass, high-gain free-electron laser (FEL) x-rayamplifier was simulated using the 3D, polychromaticsimulation code MEDUSA. The seed for the system is atable-top, soft x-ray laser. The simulated fundamental andnonlinear harmonic x-ray output wavelengths arediscussed.
1 INTRODUCTION
In a high-gain, single-pass free-electron laser (FEL)amplifier, the input seed laser determines the outputwavelength. Nonlinear harmonic interactions in free-electron lasers have been previously discussed in theliterature [1-4]. Previous amplifier systems have beenlimited in reaching soft x-ray wavelengths due to theavailable seed laser wavelengths. More recently, theadvent of table-top, soft x-ray lasers [5] have opened thepossibility of using this seed in a master oscillator poweramplifier (MOPA) arrangement. Combined with thenonlinear harmonics, significantly shorter longitudinallycoherent wavelengths can be achieved. In this paper, the3D, polychromatic FEL simulation code MEDUSA [3,4]will be used to examine a soft x-ray, table-top laser as theseed in an amplifier FEL. In addition, the resultingnonlinear harmonic power in the system will be discussed.
2 REVIEW OF THEORY
2.1High-Gain, Single-Pass Free-ElectronLasers
In a seeded high-gain, single-pass FEL, the seed laser isinjected into an undulator in synchronization with a high-quality electron beam (low emittance and energy spread,high peak current, mostly uniform in the transverse andlongitudinal planes). As the name suggests, the input seedlaser is amplified by the coupling between the radiationand the transverse electron motion. The gain of the system
* Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy,Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38.t Argonne and MAX-Lab, University of Lund, Lund S-~21 00 Sweden
H Pemment address, SAIC, McLean VA 22102
depends upon the quality of the beams and undulator”well as the relative arrival time of the electron and laserbeams. The ID resonance condition for this FELinteraction is k ~ =XU(1+K2 /2)/2y2, where &is theseed laser and output radiation wavelength, k” is theundulator period, ‘y is the relativistic factor for theelectron beam, and K is the undulator parameterK = 0.9377Buku [T-cm], for the magnetic field Bu .
A seed laser is not necessary to create a high-gain,single-pass FEL, as the spontaneous radiation shot noisewill also couple to the electron beam and beginmicrobunching. Saturation will be achieved if sut%cientundulator periods are traversed. This phenomenon isknown as self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE).As SASE starts up from noise, the output is also noisy. Ina MOPA arrangement, however, the output is more stableand can be fully longitudinally coherent.
2.2 Table-Top, Soft X-ray Lasers
Recently, the developments in table-top, soft x-raylasers have proved a possible seed source for MOPAsystems [5]. These table-top x-ray lasers use a variety ofhigh temperature plasma media, with lasing wavelengthsfrom 12 to 60 nm. One of the more versatile methods ofgenerating such table-top x-ray lasers involves thecombined use of a chirped pulse amplification (CPA)process [6] and the transient collisional excitation (TCE)scheme [7]. In TCE, a long, low-intensity laser pulse isused to generate a plasma on a target. Next, this plasma isheated briefly by an ultra-short, high-intensity laser pulse.Such heating causes a population inversion in neon- ornickel-like ions. Saturated laser output at a table-top scalefrom 33 nm down to 12 am has been achieved with thesesystems [8,9].
2.3Nonlinear Harmonic Generation
Harmonics of the fundamental are present in FELs. Assaturation is approached, the bunching occurring at thefundamental due to the interaction of the radiation andelectrons causes nonlinear growth of higher harmonics [l-4]. Due to the natural motion of the electron beam in aplanar undulator system, however, odd harmonics arepreferentially generated in the forward direction. The gainlengths of the harmonics vary in inverse proportion to theharmonic number. They also allow multiple-wavelengthIasing in FEL systems employing planar undulatorsystems.
The s.brnitted manuscript has been created by the University of Chicago m Operator of Argonne NJtional Laboratory (“Argonne”) under Conuact No, W-31-109-ENG-38with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U ,S, Government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in saidiulicle [o reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government.
DISCLAIMER
This report was,.prepared as an account of work sponsoredby an agency of the United States Government. Neitherthe United States Government nor any agency thereof, norany of their employees, make any warranty, express orimplied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility forthe accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of anyinformation, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, orrepresents that its use would not infringe privately ownedrights. Reference herein to any specific commercialproduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark,manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constituteor imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring bythe United States Government or any agency thereof. Theviews and opinions of authors expressed herein do notnecessarily state or reflect those of the United StatesGovernment or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegiblein electronic image products. Images areproduced from the best available originaldocument.
.
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
INTRODUCTION
‘ Argonne National Laboratory
● Chemical Technology Division (CMT)
● Modular Gloveboxes Designed forExperimental Work
– Laboratory Scale
– Engineering Scale
● Experimental Work Includes Equipmentand Process Development for:
—
—
Pyrochemical
Nuclear Waste Treatment
Electrochemistry
#o?4<‘4
.4)!)RFMAGs2000_l
( Q ] Argonne National Laboratory%‘2. $’%*%@**” .
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
HISTORY
● The First ANL-CMT Division ModularGlovebox was Designed and Installedin 1959. It was designated as theCENHAM glovebox.
● Desian Obiective:
—
—
—
—
—
w ●
Provide Modular Configuration
Provide Controlled AtmosphereEnvironment
Maximize Viewing Accessibility
Provide “Standardized” Work Area forLaboratory Research Work
Provide Modular Utility Service Access
Include User-Friendly Considerations
#OwL
A%* RFMAGs2000_2
“~’ o ~ Argonne National Laboratory..% &*-2.*4
G .
%7 0$@
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GLOVEBOX DESIGN REQUIRESAWARENESS OF USER NEEDS
Q Evolution of Design Over the Past 40Years
“ Request for New Gloveboxes UsuallyBased Upon Similar Attributes of anExisting Enclosure Plus ParticularProject Changes for Use.
● Discussion with Staff and LaboratoryOperating Personnel.
● Considerations:
– Simplicity in Design
– Cost Saving
– Schedule
● Defining “What is Necessary” and“What Would be Nice.”
RFMAGS2000_3
National Laboratory
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
USER-FRIENDLY GLOVEBOX DESIGN
● Gloveboxes Use a Modular DesignConcept
“ Glovebox Size is Designated asModules in Length and Tiers in Height
‘ Basic Module is 42 inch Cube
c Modular End Plates Provide for:
– Utility Services
– Ventilation/Purification
– Filter Housings
– Transfer Locks
– Bagpotts
System
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
● Steel Shell (Painted)
Q Stainless Steel Shell
“ Steel Support Frame
● Gloveports
c Glass Windows
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
STRUCTURE
Glovebox
Structural
Unistrut
Floor
She
Elements
End Plates
Hoists
Floor Wells
RFMAGS2000_6
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
UTILITIES
● Process Feedthroughs for Services
– Electrical
– Instrument
– Gas or Liquid
● Lighting
Argonne National
RFMAGS2000_7
Laboratory
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
TRANSFER SYSTEMS
Bagout
●
●
●
Large
Small
Horizontal
Horizontal
Vertical Transfer
S~hincter
Transfer
Transfer
Lock
Lock.’
Lock
RFMAGS2000_8
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
●
●
●
●
QA APPLICATION
Management Control
– Team Approach
– Process Development
– Design and Fabrication
– Scheduling
Design Review
Design for Manufacturability Reviews(DFM)
System Design Description
Safety Review
Operational Readiness Review
#lw.4c
.(!8!)* %% RFMAGS2000_9
3*
[0 ? Argonne National Laboratory*#%!%*Y~,s
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
WINDOWS
Q Window Viewing Area ComprisesApproximately 60% of the GloveboxSide Walls that Suffices for MonitoringExperimental Equipment and ProcessOperation
“ Weatherstrip Type “Zipper” Seal Usedfor Window Installation
Q Window Concept
—
—
—
Nominal 36 Inch Square Windows andWindow Openings with Rounded Corners
3/8 Inch Thick Laminated Safety GlassWindows
Glovepon% are Attached Through theWindows
@10N4c
A+ RFMAGs2000_l o*+* %+
;.< ) Argonne National Laboratory“%%” &%eyOF0+’
>
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
I
i-.I
Hoist and well
fi3[[0 o“ a
7!
v
\
-standard
IHoist ●
/“-we”
+T *N4 I-
Af4 RFMAGs2000_l 1
? 0 ‘! Argonne National Laboratoryc%-ii%?y*?,68@ .
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
Glovebox Baseboard Duct
.
,— Electrical
QOutlet
‘GasDistribution
InsideDuct Covet- ~lovebox !nstrumenFloor Outlek
tation
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GLOVEBOX SUPPORT STAND ‘
F- —+\
*+TioNAt
A# %e,e RFMAGs2000_l 3
# .+.8<. ) Argonne National Laboratory. %%%..rQF~+”-t
4 MODULE -1 1/2 TIER GLOVEBOX
1
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
*ATFJW
“Ah RFMAGs2000_l 4
( 0 ~ Argonne National Laboratory$*%%%orG+’+’ .
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
CiLOVEBOX2 MODULE -2 TIER
U.
#m4.4’
+
A*, %+ RFMAGS2000_15
[“”;.0 Argonne National Laboratory%’ g*“%*,~~fl
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GAS RECIRCULATION SYSTEM ‘-
EMERGENCYIIINLETC3REXHAUST
BUBBLER
/
,TION
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GLOVEBOX ASSEMBLY .
LJ ‘d!)’.
.
r
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GLOVEBOX FILTER ACCESSIBILITY
F1
@ou4<
A#%* RFMAGS2000_l 8
$“<. ! Argonne National Laboratory%“b #%**V~FG*’$ .
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
●
●
●
EPOXY RESIN
Inside Weld Joints are Caulked with anEpoxy Resin.
The Epoxy Resin (ABAWELD) has beenUsed on Gloveboxes in CMT for ManyYears
The Caulked Joints Provide a SmoothCorner Fillet Designed for Easy Clean-Up
.
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
WEATHERSTRIP INSTALLATION
GUN NOZZLE
SEALINGCOMPOUND
WEATHERSTRIP
,
GLASS WINDOW
GLOVEBOXWALL
.“
Argonne National Laboratory
RFMAGs2000_20
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
GLASS TYPE
● Glass laminate per ASTM Cl 172-91
● Two Iite laminate ofq3 quality glass
● Each Iite is .19 inch
Kind LA, Class 1,
thick with overacomposite thickness of .38 inch
@ WJ4 e
A
*,+&* RFMAGs2000_21
(‘ () ~ Argonne National Laboratory-2.%e J@@*F6*~
,
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
FAILURE OF GLOVEBOX WINDOWWITH GLOVEPORTS
c
E
c
E
FAILURE OF GLOVEBOX WINDOWWITHOUT GLOVEPORTS
,
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
WINDOW TEST RESULTS
● Window with four gloveports
—
—
—
—
Test terminated due to structural failure ofthe window glass
Cracks developed in the glass extendingacross the two lower gloveports
Test pressure at failure was 17 inches ofwater
No evidence of seal failure
@ ‘~’ %..
ARFMAGS2000_24
(’ 6 ~ Argonne National Laboratory% ~0*
I..
+, *6 6*$
●
,
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
WINDOW TEST RESULTS -
● Window without gloveports
– Test terminated due to structural failure ofthe window glass
– Crack developedfrom the center
in the glass radiating out
– Test pressure at failure was 30 inches ofwater (> 2 psig)
– No evidence of seal failure
RFMAGS2000_25
me National Laboratory.
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
INTERIOR ENVIRONMENTATMOSPHERE
● Flow Controls - Once Through Gas
Gas Recirculation System -● InertRequiresFilters
● Pressure
Purification System with
Controls
THE EVOLUTION OF ANL CMT GLOVEBOXES
SUMMARY
Design Approach BasedFriendly Concept
Upon User-
Utilization of ExistingDesigns
Cost Effective
Schedule
Component
Adaptable to Project Process ChangesWithout Losing Overall Effectivenessof “User-Friendly” Approach.
RFMAGS2000_27
>