wsp operating budget request 2012

Operating Budget Request

2011-2013 Biennium

Agency 225 - Washington State Patrol

2011-13 Budget Request September 2010

2011-13 Biennium Budget Request Table of Contents

Tab 1 Executive Summary (Transmittal Letter)

Tab A Organization Charts, Activity Inventory, Performance Measures and Indirect Cost Allocation Executive Organizational Chart Division Organizational Chart Budget Structure Chart Performance Measure Report Indirect Cost Allocation Tab B Recommendation Summaries

Agency Recommendation Summary - This document displays the requested dollars by fund and the average annual FTE staff for the biennium for each significant change between the current biennium and the ensuing biennium budget request. Each incremental change in the carry-forward, maintenance, and performance levels is listed as a separate line item with its own code and description. Program Recommendation Summary - This document displays for each of the three operating programs and for the capital program the dollars by fund and year and FTE staff for each of the four significant subtotals (current biennium, carry-forward level, maintenance level, and performance level).

Tab C Decision Package Summary - This document lists each decision package in

priority order divided by maintenance and policy level. Decision packages are a key set of building blocks for constructing the budget request. The decision package is the place for the agency to make a persuasive case for a proposed change.

Maintenance Level – Displays decision packages that reflect the cost of inflation, maintenance, or equipment replacement not contemplated in the current budget.

Policy (Performance) Level – Displays decision packages that represent revised strategies or substantial differences in program direction.

Tab D Revenues, Fee Changes, Working Capital, Federal Fund Estimates and Local Fund Summary

Summarized Revenues - This document displays revenue estimates received by the agency that support expenditure requests and that assist in estimating statewide fund balances.



16 Year Transportation Plan - The State Patrol Highway Account represents about 75 percent of the agency’s funding. This page displays revenue and expenditure estimates to the account over eight biennia. Proposed Fee Changes - This section provides information on the fees that the agency would like to increase in the 2011-13 Biennium. Working Capital Reserve - This lists the recommended ending fund balance for revenue accounts administered by the agency. Federal Fund Estimates/State Match - This document lists state matching requirements for federal grants received by the agency. Non-Budgeted Local Fund Summary - This summarizes financial data for non-budgeted local funds that are outside the state treasury.

Tab E Other Requested Information Agency Activity Inventory - The Activity Inventory describes the major activities of the agency, a summary of the resources (both direct and indirect) necessary to accomplish the activity, and how the activity contributes to the statewide results citizens expect from government. Consultant Usage – Transportation Funded Consultant Usage for the 2009-11 Biennium and estimates for the 2011-13 Biennium. Narrative Summaries for the Following: Recruitment and Retention Issues Vehicle and Aviation Life Cycle Analysis Interoperability Communications Systems Facility Issues Capital Project Issues Data Processing Issues Fuel Funding

CHRISTINE O. GRECOIREGovernor

IOHN R. BATISTEChief

STATE OI WASHINGTON

WASH I NGTON STATE PATROLGeneral Administration Building . PO Box 426OO . Olympia, WA 98504-2600 ¡ (360) 596-4000 o www.wsp.wa.gov

September 9,2010

Mr. Marty BrownOffice of Financial ManagementPO Box 43113Olympia WA 98504-3113

Dear Mr. Brown:

The Washington State Patrol's 2011-2013 Operating Budget request is enclosed.Listed below are some of our top priorities for funding through our operating budget:

- Pursuit vehicle replacements to bring down the mileage at replacement tothe optimum level of 1 10,000 miles.

- Trooper staffing to fully staff our Field Operations Bureau and providedispatcher support to the new troopers.

- Full deployment of the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting(SECTOR) application and digital video system for every trooper's patrolvehicle.

Our agency has other needs that are not included in this budget request, knowingadditional funding will not be available.

Without some adjustment in revenues, the State Patrol Highway Account will nothave sufficient funds to support and maintain our public safety services. We hope tocontinue discussion with OFM and Legislative staff on this issue.

Your consideration of our budget request is appreciated.

Sincerely,

JRB:dllEnclosure

ùÈt

CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE Governor

STATE OF WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON STATE PATROL

JOHN R. BATISTE Chief

General Administration Building • PO Box 42600 • Olympia, WA 98504-2600. (360) 596-4000 • www.wsp.wa.gov

September 9, 2010

Mr. Marty Brown Office of Financial Management PO Box 43113 Olympia WA 98504-3113

Dear Mr. Brown:

The Washington State Patrol's 2011-2013 Operating Budget request is enclosed. Listed below are some of our top priorities for funding through our operating budget:

Pursuit vehicle replacements to bring down the mileage at replacement to the optimum level of 110,000 miles.

Trooper staffing to fully staff our Field Operations Bureau and provide dispatcher support to the new troopers.

Full deployment of the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) application and digital video system for every trooper's patrol vehicle.

Our agency has other needs that are not included in this budget request, knowing additional funding will not be available.

Without some adjustment in revenues, the State Patrol Highway Account will not have sufficient funds to support and maintain our public safety services. We hope to continue discussion with OFM and Legislative staff on this issue.

Your consideration of our budget request is appreciated.

Sincerely,

c~~~ JRB:dll Enclosure



Field Operations Bureau The Field Operations Bureau (FOB) is primarily responsible for traffic law enforcement, collision investigation, and motorist assists on 17,524 miles of state and interstate highways. The bureau is comprised of eight districts and the Commercial Vehicle Division. Fire Protection Bureau The Office of the State Fire Marshal and Fire Protection Bureau provide services to fire districts, government agencies, members of the media, and the general public. These services include fire investigations; fire incident reporting and data collection; fire code review and adoption; construction plan review for fire sprinkler and alarm systems; and fire inspections of high risk occupancies housing elderly and vulnerable populations. In addition, the bureau regulates the fireworks and sprinkler industry through a licensing program. The State Fire Training Academy provides training to the state’s fire departments and districts. The Fire Protection Bureau also provides coordination of Washington State fire service resources for mobilization during natural or human-caused disasters. Terrorism and hazardous materials training, fire and life safety prevention education, and public information services are also responsibilities of the Fire Protection Bureau. Forensic Laboratory Services Bureau The Forensic Laboratory Services Bureau provides a wide range of forensic science expertise to city, county, and state law enforcement officers, assisting agencies at crime scenes, preparing evidence for trials, and providing expert testimony. The bureau coordinates the efforts of the State’s Breath Alcohol Test Program, Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC) Program, six Crime Laboratories, the Latent Print Laboratory, and the State Toxicology Laboratory. Investigative Services Bureau The Investigative Services Bureau consists of divisions that provide various public services, including the investigation of computer crimes, missing children, narcotics, dismantling of clandestine labs, gathering of criminal intelligence, and special operations. In addition, the bureau provides fatality and criminal investigations, vessel and terminal security and criminal history information. Technical Services Bureau The Technical Services Bureau provides many diverse services to the entire department, other law enforcement and government agencies, and members of the general public. The services include information technology, human resource services, employee training and development, electronic and microwave system services, and



emergency communications. The bureau is also responsible for the management of agency public records/disclosure; ensuring compliance to state mandates and Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) standards; comprehensive facilities management; performance of agency studies, research, revisions to manuals, performance measures, and regulation development; purchasing and management of supplies; and management of the fleet of Washington State Patrol pursuit and other vehicles.

Field Operations Bureau

Tacoma D·1

Bellevue D·2

Yakima D·3

Spokane D-4

Vancouver D·5

Wenatchee D·6

Marysville D·7

Bremerton D·8

Commercial Vehicle Division

Fire Protection Bureau

WASHINGTON STATE PATROL ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

2010

CHIEF JOHN R. BATISTE

DEPUTY CHIEF Budget and Fiscal

Services

Forensic Laboratory Services Bureau

Investigative Services Bureau

-----1 Preparedness Division Crime Laboratory Division

Criminal Investigation Division

Prevention Division Toxicology Laboratory

Division

Impaired Driving Section

Criminal Records Division

Homeland Security Division

Investigative Assistance Division

Office of Professional Standards

Special Operations Division

Technical Services Bureau

Communications Division

Electronic Services Division

Human Resource Division

Information Technology Division

Property Management Division

Risk Management Division

Training Division

OFFICE OF THE CHIEFAs of JULY 2010

CHIEFJOHN R. BATISTE

6001

DEPUTY CHIEF DAVID J. KARNITZ

6002

FIELD OPERATIONS

BUREAUASSISTANT CHIEF G. CURT HATTELL

6003

FIRE PROTECTION

BUREAUSTATE FIRE MARSHAL

CHUCK DUFFYE153

FORENSIC LABORATORY

SERVICES BUREAUActing Director

LARRY HEBERTE146

INVESTIGATIVESERVICES BUREAUASSISTANT CHIEF

GREGORY E. MILLER6004

TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAUASSISTANT CHIEFJAMES L. LEVER

6005

BUDGET AND FISCAL SERVICES

DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR

ROBERT L. MAKI

9993

CONFIDENTIAL SECRETARY

KAREN J. MILLERE036

DEPARTMENT PSYCHOLOGIST

DANIEL W. CLARKE141

GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA RELATIONS

CAPTAINJASON G. BERRY

6006

LABOR AND POLICY OFFICEDORY NICPON

E144

EXECUTIVEASSISTANT

SUZEE J. SMITHE025

3/18/2010

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Government and Media Relations

Captain Jason Berry Government and Media Relations

Badge No. 11

Dan CoonCommunications Consultant 3

Position No. 0588

Randall Pullar Electronic Media Manager

Position No. 1196

Weldon Wilson Photographer

Position No. 1320

Bob Calkins Community and Media

Relations Officer Position No. E159

Sergeant Freddy Williams Badge No. 228

Kathy Schiewe Confidential Secretary

Position No. E086

Melissa Van Gorkom Management Analyst 4

Position No. 36

AdministratorBob Maki

9993

Budget MgrHeidi Thomsen

1217

Budget Mgmt Analyst

Melissa Stricklett1297

Fiscal Analyst 3Raeanne Mitchell

1426

Budget Analyst 3Yvonne Stevens

1740

Sr Budget Mgmt Analyst

Eileen Nashleanas1296

Budget Analyst 3Renuka Sivakumar

1652

Budget Mgmt Analyst

Shawn Eckhart1690

FS/Payroll MgrAngie Gill

1299

Fiscal Analyst 5Marie Holts

1785FS ManagerKathy Cerbes

1301

Fiscal Analyst 2Colleen Grayless

1298

Fiscal Analyst 2Desiree Hernandez

1302

Fiscal Analyst 5Sandy Collins

0895

Fiscal Analyst 1Nikki Baker

0578

Fiscal Analyst 1Sheila Shaw

1110

Fiscal Analyst 1VACANT

1655

Fiscal Analyst 1Connie Whipple

1551

Fiscal Analyst 1Renee Eggleston

0160

Fiscal Analyst 3Colleen Marten

1362

Fiscal Analyst 3Dianne Spencer

1214

Secretary Supervisor

Diane Lofstrom1112

Secretary SeniorStacey Dial

1307

Office Assistant 2Juwariyah Isa

1417

Contracts MgrJeff Hugdahl

1303

Contracts Spec 2Cindy Haider

1573

Contract Spec 1Pat Hill1653

Accounting MgrBrian Wright

1624

Fiscal Analyst 4 Kathy Davis

1292

Fiscal Analyst 3Tanya Pierce

1304

Fiscal Tech 2Adam Paczkowski

1420

Fiscal Analyst 1Tina

Aschenbrenner1361

Fiscal Analyst 1Marvic Runyan

0170

Fiscal Anaylst 2Melody Maples

1319

Fiscal Analyst 2Sharon O'Brien

0617

Fiscal Analyst 4Alaine Johnson

1305

Fiscal Analyst 2Marina Foster

1477

Fiscal Analyst 2Jennifer Frost

1308

Fiscal Analyst 1Yukiko Greenfield

1153

Fiscal Tech 2Vacant1335

Fiscal Analyst 4Janis Hughes

1181

Fiscal Analyst 2Beth Fajardo

0169

Fiscal Analyst 2Angela Keck

1300

Fiscal Analyst 2 Edee Affeldt

1264

Fiscal Analyst 2Teresa Morgan

1318

Fiscal Analyst 2Terry Gadd

P1234

Budget and Fiscal Services

Organizational Chart

August 24, 2010

FIELD OPERATIONS BUREAU HEADQUARTERSORGANIZATIONAL CHART

September 7, 2010

ASSISTANT CHIEFG. Curt HattellPos. # 6003

Confidential Secretary

Stephanie PorterPos. # E037

Field Force Support

Captain Chris T. GundermannPos. # 6008

Field Force Support

Captain Jeff Sass Pos. # 7322

Administrative Assistant 3

Nancy SalsmanPos. # 0730

Lieutenant Dale Alexander

Pos. # 6023

FOB Field Force Support

Ms. Marcia J. Marsh

WMS 2: Research and Data Analyst

Pos. # 1799

Geographic Information

Systems (GIS) Analyst ITS 2Louis Hurst,

(Project 100% Grant Funded)

Research Analyst 3 Joanna

Trebaczewski, (Project, 100% Grant Funded)

Research Team

Lieutenant Michael L. Turcott

Pos. # 6027

Captain Jeff DeVere

District 1 Commander

Position #6009

Lieutenant Dale Alexander

Tacoma Freeway APA 1 & 2

Position #6029

Lieutenant Julie Johnson

East Pierce County APA 3

Position #6028

Lieutenant Sean Hartsock

Thurston County APA 4

Position #6030

Rebecca Anderson

Admin Assistant 3

Position #0039

Sgt Ray Schierhoff

East Pierce Co Detachment 3

Position #6071

Sgt Tom Olson


Position #6073

Sgt John Lizama


Position #6072

Sgt Darrell Farwell


Position #6269

Steve Ostrander

Property & Evidence

Position #1232

Sgt Pat Pronovost

Tacoma Freeway Det 1 APA 2

Position #6075

Sgt Nestor Bautista


Position #6076

Sgt Erick Thomas


Position #6077

Sgt Don Cyprain


Position #6078

Jenifer Specht

Property & Evidence

Position #0961

Carol Alexander

OA 3 - Video Disclosure

Position #0989

Tpr Brandy Kessler

Public Information Officer

Position #7028

Laura Gocha

Office Support Supervisor

Position #1070

Sgt Tom Martin

Thurston Co Detachment 6

Position #6079

Sgt Robert Brazas


Position #6080

Sgt Orest Wilson


Position #6081

Sgt Sam Ramirez


Position #6082

Sgt Chet Pennington

Tacoma M/C Detachment 11

Position #6074

Jodi Tufts FRA3

Public Disclosure

Position #0018

Reports to

Gretchen Dolan

Public Disclosure

Kathy Balcom

OA 3 Olympia

Position #1407

DISTRICT ONE

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Revised 02/02/2010

Sgt Troy Tomaras

Gig Harbor Detachment 16 APA 1

Position #7298

APA 1

DeAnna Collins

Fiscal Technician

Position #1263

Wendy Becker

OA 3 TARS Entry

Position #1221

Michelle Sharpf

OA3 TARS Entry

Position #1204

District 2 July 2010

Captain

Stephen Burns

Lieutenant William Gardiner

North Region/Motors

Lieutenant Dave Scherf

South Region/Enumclaw

Lieutenant Jeff Sass

East Region/Spec. Ops


Cynthia Dunn

Detachment 1

Sgt. TJ Johnson

Detachment 2 Sgt. Courtney

Stewart

Detachment 3

Sgt. Darren Mihelich

Detachment 4

Sgt. Tom Anderson

Detachment 14

Sgt. Dan Atchison

Detachment 15

Sgt. Mark Crandall

Detachment 16

Sgt. Kim Triplett

Detachment 18

Sgt. John Lizama

Detachment 5

Sgt. Doug Geltz

Detachment 6

Sgt. JoAnn Buettner

Detachment 7

Sgt. Dan Hefton

Detachment 8

Sgt. Chris Clark

Detachment 17

Sgt. Tom Wolfe

OA Lead

Cindy Slater

OAIII

Jeanette Harris

OAIII

Van Nguyen

OAIII

Sally Richards

OAIII

Sarah Miller

Detachment 12

Sgt. Dale Lathan

Detachment 19

Sgt. Keith Trowbridge

OAIII

Joanna Rogge

OAIII

Nancy King

Detachment 9

Target Zero

Sgt. Steve Penry

District 3 - FOB Organizational Chart

Trp Todd Haddorff, 464 Trp Paul Woodside, 398 Trp Mark Hirz, 597

Trp Corey Kingman, 564 Trp Kristopher Sperry, 376 Trp Brad Neff, 617

Trp Matt Couchman, 598 Trp Doug Lux, 479

Trp Jay Farmer, 688 Trp Michael Jensen, 545 Trp Rob Morris, 810

Trp Richard Welch, 838 Trp Marty Finan, 934

Trp Rocky Miller, 948

Trp Bryan Ball, 933

Trp Ron Nordman, 1048

Trp Don Bancroft, 496Trp Travis Lamb, 1021

Trp Dave Wilbur, 1125

Motors

Trp Trevor Downey, 972

Trooper - El Protector

Oscar Garcia, 778

Detachment 7 Detachment 8

Trp Brian Bond, 388

Lieutenant

Jason W. Armstrong, 93

Office Assistant 3

Anna Castellanos, Z310

Sgt. Tom Foster, 150

Lieutenant

James W. Keightley, 41

Detachment 4

Laurel Cortez, Z308

Sgt. Mike Eggleston, 135

CaptainShawn E. Berry, 23

Detachment 6

Administrative Assistant 3

Norma Moreno, X395

Trp Jim Brown, 590 Office Assistant 3

Detachment 2

VACANT

Detachment 3

Evidence Custodian Office Assistant 3

Cher Dumler, Z304

Office Assistant 2

Ed McAvoy, X393

Trp Mike Cortez, 306

Detachment 1

Sgt. Jeff Closner, 199

Trooper - Limited Duty

David Yergen, 979

Trp David Brandt, 313Office Assistant 3 Trp Sid Grant, 354

Sgt. Zach Elmore, 227 Sgt. Roger Wilbur, 120

Trp. DJ Goldsmith, 1001

Sgt. Aaron B. Hayes, 239

Trp Seth T. Berghoff, 330

Linda Alter, Z305Faye Swoboda, Z306

Trp Grant Smith, 439

Trp Sergio Cervantes, 401

Trp Daniel Mosqueda, 539

Trp Jeff Southards, 1158

Trp David Kaiser, 634Trp Darin Foster, 941

Trp Sean R. Chatterton, 868

Trp Trevor Herrud, 856

Trp Shawn Williams, 601

Trp Joe Klundt, 672

Trp Tom Mortensen, 916

VACANT

Trp Chris Thorson, 1164

Trp James Zane, 1157

VACANT

Trp John Berends, 957

Trp Andres Martinez, 1067Trp William Rutherford, 1012 Trp Curtis Likes, 896

Revised 7/1/10

Trp Gary Miller, 997

Trp Barry Pilkinton, 1202

Trp Ryan Sauve, 1138

Trp Pat Lunning, 994 Trp Dan Mann, 995

Trp W. Stellmacher, 1226

Trp K.C. Scott, 1063

Trp Karey Reisdorph, 1000

District Commander

Captain Jeff Otis

District Secretary

Ms. Connie Bedient

Position # 0041

Assistant District

Commander

Lieutenant Steve Turcott

Assistant District

Commander

Lieutenant Bob Kerwin

Detachment 2

Spokane

Sergeant Len Walker

Detachment 3

Spokane

Sergeant Eric Koch

Detachment 1

Spokane

Sergeant Kris Schweigert

Detachment 4

Spokane

Sergeant Pat Percival

Detachment 9

Special Operations

Sergeant Doug Jacobs

Detachment 5

Spokane

Sergeant Jim Hays

District 4


Detachment 11

Spokane Motors

Trooper Wayne Turner

Trooper Jeff Sevigney

Trooper Will Thompson

Trooper Joe Pass

Office Assistant 3

Ms. Sandy Gibson

Fiscal

Position # 1228

Evidence

Mr. Gary Scott

Position # 1258

Detachment 7 Ritzville

Sergeant Steve Morehead

Detachment 6 Colfax

Sergeant Brad Hudson

Office Assistant 3

Ms. Karen Groom

Position # 1226

Office Assistant 3

Ms. Leslie Kubik

Position # 1225

Detachment 8 Colville

Sergeant Chan St. Clair

Office Assistant 3

Ms. Coral Herron

Position # 1224

Senior Volunteer

Program

Office Assistant 2

Ms. Marylyn Conachen

Supplies

Position # 1207April 21, 2010

f-

-

-

-

I I I

Washington State Patrol – District 5 Organizational Chart

May 1, 2010

Captain Robert N. Johnson

OA3 Jennifer A. Lulay

Lieutenant Kenneth S. Garrison

84

OA3 Nadine A. Medford

Secretary Supervisor Michelle A. Smith

Det 1 Vancouver Sergeant

Randy L. Hullinger

BL Ching


Thomas R. Butsch

J Layman

BJ Jordan

BE Forsberg

DW Bourland

RD Wollnick

SM Robley

SK Raedel

J Maier

BM Clark

RD Thompson

M Padilla

JD Ortiz

AN Liksakov

TS Gates


Roy L. Rhine

RS Bettger

PIO SA Schatzel

BO Taylor

RW Tanner

NA Jennings

JJ Heath

C Greene

CR Gardiner

JW Gainer

Det 8 Goldendale Sergeant

Dale P. Retzlaff

Maintenance Mechanic

Monte Ward

Det 12 Motors Sergeant

Jason M. Linn

GS Little

MK Wells

N Hoffberger

WR Clack

RD Cashatt

ME Boardman

MM Calderone

JD Blain

OA3 Ericka

Det 4 Kelso Sergeant

Glenn L. Hobbs

Det 11 Morton Sergeant

Jason Ashley

Det 7 Chehalis Sergeant

Jeff B. Speer

Det 6 Chehalis Sergeant

Larry D. Bradeen

Det 5 Kelso Sergeant

Blair W. Schmidt

Lieutenant Ronald P. Rupke

50

BD Ensley

MA Hoggatt

MB Johnson

GP Olson

JA Winborne

CJ Warren

A Tonissen

J Street

KS Lutz

K Johnson

NA Deffenbaugh

JR Cuthbert

OA3 Deborah Moe

Evidence Custodian Danny St. Pierre

ZP Casey TL Brunstad

MJ Chapman

JJ Valek

IB Dorsey

S Murphy

WA Knudson CL Sahlinger

GL Lane

BA Moon

PJ Thoma

R Sills

TR Thornburg

JS Gola

MR Anderson

BL Ashley

CD Hoff

JE Matagi

BJ McBride

RA Moore

MP Cournyer

CR Ecklund

ML Herron

JA Hicks

NP Hovinghoff

Z Welch

DJ Pardue

OA3 Aileen Yost

OA3 Stephanie

NO Weaver

TK Surdam

District Six Organizational Chart

CAPTAIN

KAREN DEWITT

LT. KANDI PATRICK

LT. B. SCOTT MARTIN

Maria Jordan


OA3 Sharon Blanchard hard

Sgt. Leeon Leyde

Detachment 1

Sgt. Monty Colver

Detachment 3

Sgt. Kurt Adkinson

Detachent 4

Sgt. Jeff Swanson

Detachment 6

Sgt. Kiley Conaway

Detachment 7

Sgt. Mike Saunders

Detachment 2

Sgt. Art Nelson

Detachment 5

PIO

Trp. Rich Magnussen

PEC Scott Douglass

Captain Ken Ginnard

District VII Commander

Lt. Mark Arras

Assistant District CommanderLt. Debby Ethredge

Assistant District Commander

Lt. Scott McCoy

Assistant District Commander

Laurie Cashen


Position #0043

Sgt. Drake

Det. 3/APA 31

Burlington

Sgt. Turner

Det. 11/APA 31

Burlington

Lynette Thompson/

Melissa Fecht

OA3/Burlington/Position

#0097 (Tandem)

Sgt. Dennis

Det. 4/APA 30

Bellingham

Sgt. Armstrong

Det. 14/APA 30

Bellingham

Clara Hamilton

OA3/Bellingham

Position #0864

Sgt. J. Longoria

Det. 7/APA 32

Oak Harbor

District VII

Sgt. H. Jackson

Det. 6/APA 34

Monroe

Sgt. G. Erwin

Det. 5/APA 34

Monroe

Diane Pietz

OA3/Monroe

Position #1220

Sgt. J. Beazizo

Det. 16/SHCAT

Marysville

Sgt. R. Cook

Det. 12/Motors

Marysville

Sgt. B. Turk

Det. 8/APA 33

Silverlake

Sgt. S. Bendiksen

Det. 2/APA 33

Silverlake

Sgt. K. Rudeen

Det. 1/APA 33

Marysville

Sgt. J. Riley

Det. 15/APA 33

Marysville

Bridget Hamilton

OA3/Silverlake

Position #1230

Shirley Kennedy

PEC

Position #1707

George Leonard

PEC

Position #1257

Anne Foreman

OA2/District Office

Position #1210

Karen Radunz

OA3/District Office

Position #1075

February 1, 2010

Alicia Crossley

OA3/Oak Harbor

Position #1229

Trp. K. Leary

PIO

Trp. M. Braaten

Contract OT

Sgt. K. Schweigert

Det. 9/DUI Squad

Marysville

I

I J i ---1

---1

f-

District 8 Organization Chart – 7/15/2010

Captain Steve Sutton

Bremerton

Lt. Julie Myer

Region One

Bremerton

Detachment 1

Sgt. Kent Hitchings

Bremerton

Jan Larson

Office Assistant 3

Bremerton

Detachment 2

Sgt. Brian Monteer

Bremerton

Detachment 8/11

Sgt. Mark Tegard

Bremerton

Detachment 12

Sgt. Ken Przygocki

Bremerton

Lt. Tim Winchell

Region Two

Shelton

Detachment 4

Sgt. Conley

Shelton

Wendy Brooks

Office Assistant 3

Shelton

Detachment 5

Sgt. Mike Erickson

Hoquiam

Merri Springer

Office Assistant 3

Hoquiam

Detachment 14

Sgt. Tyler Drake

Hoquiam

Detachment 7

Sgt. Jody Metz

Naselle

Nikki Footh

Office Assistant 3

Naselle

Lt. Clint Casebolt

Region Three

Port Angeles

Detachment 3

Sgt. Gailin Hester

Port Angeles

Detachment 6

Sgt. Brett yacklin

Port Angeles

Puri Heacock

Office Assistant 3

Port Angeles

Trp. Krista Hedstrom

PIO

Bremerton

Karen Burress

Property Evidence

Bremerton

Kae Balogh


Brenda Ehli

Office Assistant 3

Bremerton

Cindi Presba

Office Assistant 3

Bremerton

Captain6007/Badge 15

Darrin T. Grondel

Region 1 Lieutenant6024/Badge 40Steven Johnson

Region 2 Lieutenant 6025/Badge 45Kevin W. Zeller

SafetyNet ManagerP055

Vacant

Region 3 Lieutenant6026/Badge 92Jeffrey S. Jones

Secretary Supervisor 21

Carol A Fagan

OA31060

Janet Moffatt

CSS 2P085

Vacant

CSS1P056

Raul Murcia

CSS 1P022

Eddylou Wallace

CSS 2P194

Jacob Hursey

CSS 1/ProjectP012

Vacant

CSS2P105

Jennifer Houskeeper

7/22/2010

HeadquartersCommercial Vehicle Division

Region 4 Lieutenant7080/Badge

Vacant

CSS 1/Project1838

Jennifer Nashleanas

ITS5P202

Ken Keiper

ITS4P125

Wil Armagost

ITS4P031

Chip Rasmus

ITS3P081

Rob Stevens

ITS21173

Marlene Park

Region 5 Lieutenant7278/Badge 99

Robert E. Reandeau

Grant/Contract Mgr1868

Linda Shincke

CVEO 40806 / Badge x700

Robert Petersen


Bill Balcom


Mike Worlund

TRAININGSPECIALIST

CVEO 21965 / Badge x 734

Ryan Wiese

HAZ MATSPECIALIST

CVEO 20942 / Badge x 755

Ray Demarest

HAZMAT SPECIALIST

CVEO 31244 / Badge 726

Mike Herron

Trooper/Fuel Tax6211 / Badge 1174

Leonard Mcglaughlin

Trooper/Fuel Tax6219 Badge / 909

Brian Messer

Administrative Sergeant

7037 / Badge #192John Buma III


Darrin T. Grondel

Region 1 Lieutenant6024/Badge 40Steven Johnson

District 10Compliance Review

CR – East CVEO 3

1524/Badge X719Dean Ide

CVEO 21519/Badge X736Nicholas Hopper

CVEO 21518/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 21520/Badge X 747

Dean Robinson

CVEO 21517/Badge x

Vacant

CR - West CVEO 3

1516/Badge X 714Marc Modler

CVEO 21522/Badge x733

Ronald Hyatt

CVEO 21513/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 21514/Badge X937Aaron Gustafson

CVEO 21515/Badge X757

Beverly Wilson


John Coulliette

CVEO 21521/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 21523/Badge X732Thomas Munafo

New Entrant ProgramDistrict 10-64

CVEO 3P201/Badge X710

Linda Powell

CVEO 1P199/Badge X917Anthony Cooling


Dale Huber

CVEO 1P200/Badge X811Melissa Ackerlund


Robert Steen

8/30/2010

Region 1 Commercial Vehicle Division

CR - NorthCVEO 3

1824/Badge X718Debbie Temple

Secretary Senior1533

Louise Douglas


Michael NesaryCVEO 2

1825/Badge X746Kellie Crookshank


Don Ross

CVEO 21827/Badge X935Andrew Stevens


Terry Cox


Gary Miner

CVEO 2 1844/Badge X 735

Sam Nichols

CVEO 2 (HB)1842/Badge X

Vacant


Charles Davis

CR – BasinCVEO 3

0628/Badge X713Steve Maier

SafetyNet

CSS 2P085

Vacant

CSS2P105

Jennifer Houskeeper

CSS 1P056

Raul Murcia

CSS 1/ProjectP012

Vacant

CSS 1P022

Eddylou Wallace

CSS 2P194

Jacob Hursey

CVEO 2/CRA81512/Badge x 932Peter Sponburgh

CSS 1/Project1838

Jennifer Nashleanas


Darrin T. Grondel

Region 2 Lieutenant6025 Badge

Vacant

District 2 Bellevue

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.

6215/Badge 197Luke Zebley

Tow Truck6217/Badge 866

Darrin Helton

Trp/Interior7124/Badge 527

Chris Hooper

Trp/TACT6216/Badge 1192Michael Sommer

Trp/Interior6212/Badge 592Lynette Mitchell

Wrecking Yard6218/Badge 341Renee Padgett


James Correll


Kelly Spangler

CVD/TACT Sgt.

6064/ Badge 277Joe Ross

Trp/TACT6214/Badge 1085Chuck Schroeder

Trp/Interior6210/Badge 1187Jim MacGregor

Trp/Interior6211/Badge 1174Len McLaughlin

Trp/TACT6209/Badge 656

Beth Joswick


Paul Rogojin


Ricky Fisher

InteriorCVEO 3

0808/Badge X 717 Cristie Lakey

CVO 1/Bus1025/Badge X842

Keith Barton

CVO 1/Bus1711/Badge X 876

Mike Palios


Arnold Leitz

CVEO 1/Bus1713/Badge X

Vacant


Donald Knoop


Ray Norris


Chad Stark

District 7 Marysville

POE #30 CVEO 3

0813/Badge X 715Rich Griebel

CVEO 11162/Badge x881 Richard Baran, Jr.

CVEO 21157/Badge X 750Michael Williams


Mike Mullen


Jerry Carter

CVEO 11498/Badge X767Shelly Gonsalves

CVEO 11497/Badge X

Vacant

OA31195

Joanne Barnes

Interior/SWB CVEO 3

0805/Badge X 729Ernie Brown


Chong Jewell


Daniel Dimock


Sean O’Neill


Ryan Farrell

CVEO 11380 / Badge x

Vacant


Dean Appell

CVEO 11246/Badge x 863

Garry Lemmon

POE #31 CVEO 3

0594/Badge X 725Gayle Lapp

CVEO 11047/Badge X 771Mathew Thompson

CVEO 11342/Badge X 774David Armstrong

CVEO 1 1158/Badge x 849

Gary Geleynse

CVEO 11156/Badge X

Vacant


Jeff Winslow


Leslie Walker

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.

6069/Badge 155 Joe Bussman


Alice Collins


Don Cody


Douglas Sackman


Javan James


Ray Ensley

Trp/Interior6242/Badge 958Scott Wernecke


Tom Nickelson

Wrecking Yard6243/Badge 1163

Troy Giddings

Region 2 Commercial Vehicle Division

8/30/2010

Trp/Interior7114/Badge 411Cameron Birman

District 1 Tacoma

Interior CVEO 3

0807/Badge X 707Kevin Valentine

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.

6063/Badge 222Dave Bangart


Margaret Wolfe

CVO 1/Bus1369/ Badge x873

John Smith


David Guyant

CVEO 11382/Badge X 882Tiffany Grayless

CVEO 1P167/Badge x 763

Thomas Yates

CVEO 1/Bus1008/Badge X 834

Jeff Layton

CVEO 1/Bus1672 Badge x768Emily Lawrence


Dion DoarTrp/Interior

6201/ Badge 1169Mel Hurd

Trp/Interior6202/ Badge 1088Andrew Stoeckle


Cindy Hacker

Trp/Interior6203/Badge 345Michael Harmon

Trp/TACT6818/Badge

Vacant

Wrecking Yard6205/Badge 1185

Mike Weldin


Amy Cabrera


John Wabel


Darrin T. Grondel

Region 3 Lieutenant6026/Badge 92Jeffrey S. Jones

District 3Yakima

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.6065 / Badge X 162

Devyn Derrick

Tpr. TACT6220/Badge 1107

Trent Clasen

Tow Truck6221/Badge 453Mark Danielson

POE CVEO 3

0809/ Badge X723Dave Coppinger

CVEO 10938/ Badge x

Vacant

CVEO 20653/Badge x742

Dennis Gaffey

CVEO 1P034/Badge X770David Robinson

CVEO 10372/Badge X 820William Johnston

CVEO 10592/Badge X 848Ryan Hernandez


David Rogers

CVEO 11674/Badge X 822Jeremiah Marceau


Ricky Berry


Clay Tallman

CVEO 1/Bus0625/Badge X

Vacant

Interior CVEO 3

0373/Badge X 709Gene McDaniel


Michael Tacket

CVEO 1/Bus1014/Badge X867William Hudson


David Smith


Ron Alred


Keith Qunell

CVEO 20186/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 11239/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 1/Bus1356/Badge X 814

Steven Stiles

CVEO 1/Bus1639/Badge X823

Jim Warren


Jay Gustin

District 4 Spokane

POE 30 CVEO 3

0936/Badge X721Bonnie DeVere

CVEO 11030/Badge X826Donald McGilvray


Jim Ellison


James Spencer

OA31061

Vacant

CVEO 10624/Badge X

847David Huisman


James Halle

CVEO 10213/Badge X 832Douglas Giovanelli

InteriorCVEO 3

0168/Badge X712Larry Pasco


Bruce Armond


Fred Aebischer

CVEO 10187/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 2P052/Badge X 752

John Triplett

CVEO 1/Bus1033/Badge X800Loren Ottenbreit

CVEO 10655/Badge X928Stephen Erickson


Sam Scarpelli

Tpr/Interior7151/Badge 1034

Robert LaMay

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.

6066/Badge 238Eric Hanson


Antonio Olivas

Tow Truck6226/Badge 1031Brad Osmonovich


Don Skjothaug


Kevin Clark


Paul Shepler

POE 31CVEO 3

0810/Badge X724Robbie Robinson


Brian Baldwin


Bruce Brown


George Goss


Steven Spiros


Mark Littlefield

CVO 11002/Badge X846

William Blaine

District 6 Wenatchee

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt.

6068/Badge 211Kevin Overbay


Darren Wright


John Moen


Tim Stratton


Steven Houle

Trp/Interior 6234/Badge 0763

Brian Sackman

POE CVEO 3

1352/Badge X728Sharon Henry


Michael Bugni

CVEO 11021 Badge x 827Ronald Hoffman

CVEO 11370/Badge X

Vacant


Britta McDaniel

CVEO 11015 /Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 1P161 /Badge x

905Dale Kavanagh

CVEO 11680/Badge #

Vacant


Paul Scholz


Ronald Griffith

POECVEO 3

0812/Badge X716Tim Pearson

CVEO 1P037/ Badge x

Lace Koler


Brenda Davis

CVEO 10622/Badge x 766Larry Lesmeister


Nolan Rice


Jovita Ramirez

Region 3Commercial Vehicle Division

8/30/2010

CVEO 1P035/Badge X

Vacant

Trp/Interior7041/Badge 757Ernest Rampley

Trp/Interior7092/Badge

Vacant

CVEO 1 Bus1494/Badge X

Vacant

CVEO 1 Bus1493/Badge X

Vacant

OA3T1061

Cheryl Jordan


John Koch

Trp/Interior 7323/Badge 1217William Pelleberg

Tpr/MCSAP7324/Badge

Vacant

Captain6007/ Badge 15

Darrin T. Grondel

District 8Bremerton


Burk McMullin

CVEO 20650/Badge X

Vacant


8/30/2010


Tim Mulrine

CVEO 11385/Badge x

Vacant

CVO 1 Bus1371/Badge X850

Daryl Whitaker

CVEO 1 Bus1781/Badge x

Vacant

CVD/Tow TruckSgt.

6070/Badge 191Pat Gallagher

Tpr/Tow Truck6250/Badge 443Walter Chartrand

Tpr/Interor6249/Badge 1184

Bruce Watson


Steve Michael

Tpr/Interior6248/Badge 0389Gabriel Fletcher


Rob Atkinson

Tpr/Interior6245/Badge 750Randy Gardner

InteriorCVEO 3

0814/Badge X722Jeff Osberg

District 5 Vancouver

CVD/Tow Truck Sgt. 6067/Badge 141

Scott Essman


Craig Powell


Dale Luthy

Trp/Interior 6228/Badge 1166

David Hodel

Trp/Interior6227/ Badge 490 Gordon Gruendell

Tpr/Wrecking Yard6231/Badge 578

Robert Ayers

Tpr/Tow Truck6230/Badge 424

Stan Batt

POE #30CVEO 3

0811/Badge X730Dale Richardson


Pam Striker

CVEO 10180/Badge X 843William Richardson


Corey Turner

CVO 1 1676/Badge X855

Kelly Tabor

CVEO 11375/Badge X 845 Robert Schultheis


Chris Cerny

OA3 1058

Lois Lee

CVO 1/Bus 1019/Badge X 808

Randy Rambo

CVO1/Bus1782/Badge X852

Victor Sanders

POE #31CVEO 3

0627/Badge X727Frank Fague


Larry Engles

CVEO 1 1035 Badge 899

Kyle Frank


Andilee Murphy


Danny Bernard


Dave Wyatt


Donald Muros


Thomas Byrnes

InteriorCVEO 3

1050/Badge X711Gary Park

CVEO 2 P053/Badge X 754Jeffrey Macchione

CVEO 1 0208/Badge X815

Jeff Walter

CVEO 1 0626/Badge X924

Steve McDaniel


Gary Krause

CVEO 1 1353/Badge x

Vacant

Sec SeniorP192

Day-Sheryl Viray

Region 47080/Badge

Vacant


Darrin T. Grondel

Region 5 Lieutenant7278/Badge 99

Robert E. Reandeau

8/30/2010


Secretary SeniorPos# 1533

Louise Douglas

C:\Documents and Settings\dmik225\Desktop\July 13 2010.doc

State Fire Marshal Chuck Duffy

E0153

PREPAREDNESS DIVISION Asst. SFM Paul Perz

1623

PREVENTION DIVISION Asst. SFM Anjela St. John

1431

Licensing Section Chief Deputy SFM

Dan Johnson 1703

Inspection Section Chief Deputy SFM Brandon LeMay

1460

Plan ReviewSection Chief Deputy SFM

Lance Talley 1505

Academy FTA Administrator Vacant

1464 Professional Development & Response

Chief Deputy SFM Paul Snider 1632

DSFM Esther Hernandez

1440

Instruction CDSFM

Howard Scartozzi 1447

Operations Maintenance Mechanic 4

Tracy Caldwell 1692

Maintenance Mechanic 2 Doug Baldwin

1463

Maintenance Mechanic 1 Levi Scartozzi

1506 Voc. Ed. Splcst.

Mike Aboe 1448

OA3 Carol Lee Zemler 1453

Admin Assist 3 Kathy Ritter

1635

Commerce Specialist Humberto Rodriguez

1456

DSFM Karen Jones

1507

DSFM Ken Dellsite

1433

OA3 Beverly McCoy

1700

DSFM Cole Roberts

1436

DSFM Lyall Smith

1570

DSFM Mike Sturgeon

1435

DSFM Don West

1441

DSFM Dan Young

1439

OA3 Marie Davis

1451

DSFM Cliff Rogers

1437

DSFM Barbara McMullen

1701

DSFM Paul Schroer

1560

DSFM Marie Valladares

1434

DSFM Duane VanBeek

1438

Confidential Secretary Ellen Tombleson

E104

Secretary Supervisor Jackie Duby

1457

Admin Assist. 3 Cathy Nicholson

1582

DSFM E. Shane Hughes

1363

DSFM Phil Cane

1558

DSFM vacant 1746

NFIRS DSFM Melissa Gannie

1561

Instructor Support E062

Fire Protection Bureau July 15, 2010

OA3 Vacant

1858

DSFM Doug DeGraff

1859

Voc. Ed. Splcst. Bob Jones

1450

DSFM Ron Bowen

1430

DSFM Ed Borgatti

1442

Commerce Specialist Sharon Aust

1452

OA3 Heather Smith

1455

DSFM Barbara Gagner

1459

DSFM Sue Carr

1445

APPROVED: State Fire Marshal Charles M. Duffy (Date)

Voc. Ed. Splcst. B. Jones -1450

B. Jones - 1450

Forensic Laboratory Services BureauLarry Hebert

Interim Bureau CommanderE146

Kitty JacobsConfidential Secretary

E105

Jeff TeitelbaumLibrary Information Specialist

1474

Crime Laboratory DivisionLynn McIntyre

Acting Division ManagerE143

Rebecca CortezAA 30736

Seattle Crime LaboratoryJim Tarver

Laboratory Manager0828

Martin GooldOffice Manager

1115

Mary Ann CoppOA 30708

Salome HammondPEC1062

Victor El KouryPEC1274

Barry ShermanOA 31466

Bev HimickFS 51413

DNA

Nathan BruesehoffFS 4 - Vancouver

0901

Amy JagminFS 41565

William StubbsFS 31648

Sarah AtterburyFS 31659

Tara RoyFS 31202

Jennifer VendittoFS 21465

Amy SmithFS 31657

Jodi SassFS 51268

DNA

Katie WoodardFS 3

1471 (50%)

Megan InsleeFS 3

1471 (50%)

Jennifer ReidFS 3

1667 (50%)

VACANTFS 21661

Brianne HusebyFS 3

1667 (50%)

Kari O'NeillFS 31660

Kim SmithFS 21808

Denise RodierFS 21809

Ed SuzukiFS 50793

CHEMISTRY

Ray KusumiFS 21064

Eric FinneyFS 20826

Martin McDermotFS 31470

Mark StrongmanFS 31422

Cynthia GraffFS 31547

Donna WilsonFS 20820

Steve ReidFS 30785

Jeff JagminFS 50795

TRACE QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS

Steven StoneFS 20905

Brett BishopFS 31717

Margaret BarberFS 31469

Alexis SanzoFS 31656

Rick WyantFS 51091

FIREARMS

Brian SmelserFS 31542

Mike CroteauFS 31063

Kathy GeilFS 31815

Marysville Crime LaboratoryIngrid Dearmore


Gail BruderPEC1557

Sarah HolmesPEC0911

VACANTPEC

T1557

David NorthropFS 50845

CHEMISTRY TRACE

Bill MarshallFS 31548

Joanne MarzowskiFS 31188

Janice WuFS 31658

Karen CraryFS 31201

Daniel Van WykFS 31731

Greg FrankActing FS 5

0825

DNA

VACANTFS 31203

Lisa CollinsFS 31647

Mariah LowFS 31810

Lisa CaseyFS 2P247

Kristina HoffmanFS 21802

Tacoma Crime LaboratoryTerry McAdam


Jessie HornbeakPEC0909

Marion BrownPEC0829

B. Joan HollandOA 31742

Chris SewellFS 50902

DNA

Jeremy SandersonFS 41504

Marion ClarkFS 21194

Will DeanFS 31613

Ron WojciechowskiFS 51269

TRACE

Rebecca BrewerFS 21546

Susan WilsonFS 30896

Terry FranklinFS 51189

FIREARMS

Johan SchoemanFS 30843

Brenda LawrenceFS 31569

Carol MorenoLT 21564

Kim HeftonFS 50782

CHEMISTRY

Jane BoysenFS 30844

Tami KeeFS 3

1472 - Part-time

Mary WilsonFS 31627

Maureena DudschusFS 3 - Part-time

1425

Frank BoshearsFS 31190

Vancouver Crime LaboratoryKen McDermott


Sharyl CrabtreePEC0910

Linda EdwardsPEC1734

Bruce SigginsFS 50899

CHEMISTRY

Catherine DunnFS 31650

Jason DunnFS 31193

Sharon HerbelinFS 20904

James CurrieFS 51811

DNA

John DunnFS 31803

David StritzkeFS 21804

Teresa ShankFS 21805

Heather PylesFS 2P250

Stephenie Winter-SermenoFS 51719

DNA

Jennifer DahlbergFS 21725

Trevor ChowenFS 31721

Erica GrahamFS 31722

Caron PruiettFS 31723

Spokane Crime LaboratoryKevin Fortney


Betty KonradPEC0735

Kathy FritzPEC1119

Alexandrea SeaboaltOA 31819

Lisa TurpenFS 51720

DNA

Michael LinFS 21732

Stephen GreenwoodFS 31549

VACANTFS 41662

VACANTFS 11733

Lorraine HeathFS 51552

DNA

Kristi BarrFS 31285

Anna WilsonFS 31199

Denise OlsonFS 30903

VACANTFS 21807

William CulnaneFS 51267

FIREARMS

VACANTFS 40823

Stan McGeeFS 30784

Glenn DavisFS 31814

Jayne AunanFS 51266

CHEMISTRY TRACE

Sheri JenkinsFS 41421

William SchneckFS 40906

Jason StenzelFS 31270

Kevin JenkinsFS 31543

Devon HauseFS 21649

Trevor AllenFS 20824

KENNEWICK LABORATORYCharlie Solomon

FS 50799

CHEMISTRY

Tina LaVillePEC0912

Andrea RicciFS 21628

Jason TriggFS 31554

VACANTFS 30995

Latent Prints LaboratoryRandy Watson


Susan SabilloPEC0951

Robert PruettPEC1736

Jim LuthyFS 31730

Jill ArwineFS 31145

Eileen SlavinFS 31143

Stacey AumanFS 30756

Donald BrannanFS 30892

Courtney WillisFS 20781

Sara TrejoFS 20891

Scott RedheadFS 31144

Crime Scene Response TeamKaren Green

FS 4 - Crime Scene Coordinator1813

Mitch NessanFS 31473

VACANTFS 31467

CODIS LaboratoryJean Johnston


Natasha PrangerFS 41553

Carol VoFS 31817

Monica PriceFS 31726

Sherri PhillipsFS 21724

Robert DorionFS 31670

Stephanie KarczynskiFS 21867

Marianne LessardOA 31866

Standards and AccountabilityErik Neilson

Acting Quality Assurance ManagerE157

Taya HendryAA 11738

VACANTLaboratory Accreditation Manager

1812

George JohnstonQuality Process Manager

1191

Gary ShutlerDNA Technical Lead

1271

Phil HodgeFS 31737

Toxicology DivisionDr. Fiona CouperState Toxicologist

E163

Toxicology LaboratoryVACANT


Brian CapronFS 51595

Chris JohnstonFS 31591

Lisa NobleFS 31593

Asa LouisFS 31759

Brianna PetersonFS 31795

Christie MitchellFS 21820

Brianne O'ReillyFS 31651

Justin KnoyFS 31728

Melissa PembertonFS 51587

Sarah SwensonFS 31590

Naziha NuwayhidFS 31586

Brittany BallFS 21794

Gwynyth AlmendarezFS 21592

Rebecca FlahertyFS 21589

VACANTFS 31689

VACANTFS 21748

VACANTFS 51821

Jennifer RiceOffice Manager

1727

Robert SmithPEC1583

Mistica StraightPEC1596

Ileah KangOA 31584

Melissa SimpsonOffice Manager

T1727

Jason SklerovQuality Assurance

1634

Amanda BlackFS 41588

Impaired Driving SectionRob ReichertLieutenant

6060

Sally VerrinderAA 31562

Breath Test ProgramRob SharpeSergeant

6192

Sandy SatoOA 31118

Ken DentonDistrict 2Trooper

6775

Doug JonesDistrict 2Trooper6776

Mike CheekDistrict 2Trooper6777

Justin DestitoDistrict 3Trooper6779

Doug DorichDistrict 3Trooper

6778

Dan MannDistrict 4Trooper6780

Jon MartinDistrict 6Trooper

6782

Breath Test Program

Randy VranishSergeant

6190

Rod GullbergRA 31783

Ruth CramerDistrict 1

FS 11117

Denny StumphDistrict 1Trooper

6774

Shane MadsenDistrict 5Trooper6781

Jim Van DiestDistrict 7Trooper6783

Beth McCourt-ChovilDistrict 7Trooper

6784

Bill BogenDistrict 8

FS 10991

Steve LuceIgnition Interlock

Trooper7325

DRE ProgramCourtney Stewart

Sergeant6191

Elaine HagsethCTED Specialist 1

1704

VACANTCTED Specialist 1

1784

Moses GarciaTraffic Safety Resource Prosecutor

E164

Courtney PoppTraffic Safety Resource Prosecutor

E165

LIMS & IT SupportJohanna NoedelBusiness Liaison

1427

Sandra DistefanoITS 51585

VACANTITS 51818

Eric SchallerITS 41754

VACANTITS 41358

Melody YuITS 41822

Craig NiiyamaITS 30992

Galina ShepelITS 3P0227

Crime Laboratory DivisionLynn McIntyre

Acting Division ManagerE143

Rebecca CortezAA 30736

Seattle Crime LaboratoryJim Tarver


Martin GooldOffice Manager

1115

Mary Ann CoppOA 30708

Salome HammondPEC1062

Victor El KouryPEC1274

Barry ShermanOA 31466

Bev HimickFS 51413

DNA

Nathan BruesehoffFS 4 - Vancouver

0901

Amy JagminFS 41565

William StubbsFS 31648

Sarah AtterburyFS 31659

Tara RoyFS 31202

Jennifer VendittoFS 21465

Amy SmithFS 31657

Jodi SassFS 51268

DNA

Katie WoodardFS 3

1471 (50%)

Megan InsleeFS 3

1471 (50%)

Jennifer ReidFS 3

1667 (50%)

VACANTFS 21661

Brianne HusebyFS 3

1667 (50%)

Kari O'NeillFS 31660

Kim SmithFS 21808

Denise RodierFS 21809

Ed SuzukiFS 50793

CHEMISTRY

Ray KusumiFS 21064

Eric FinneyFS 20826

Martin McDermotFS 31470

Mark StrongmanFS 31422

Cynthia GraffFS 31547

Donna WilsonFS 20820

Steve ReidFS 30785

Jeff JagminFS 50795

TRACE QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS

Steven StoneFS 20905

Brett BishopFS 31717

Margaret BarberFS 31469

Alexis SanzoFS 31656

Rick WyantFS 51091

FIREARMS

Brian SmelserFS 31542

Mike CroteauFS 31063

Kathy GeilFS 31815

Marysville Crime LaboratoryIngrid Dearmore


Gail BruderPEC1557

Sarah HolmesPEC0911

VACANTPEC

T1557

David NorthropFS 50845

CHEMISTRY TRACE

Bill MarshallFS 31548

Joanne MarzowskiFS 31188

Janice WuFS 31658

Karen CraryFS 31201

Daniel Van WykFS 31731

Greg FrankActing FS 5

0825

DNA

VACANTFS 31203

Lisa CollinsFS 31647

Mariah LowFS 31810

Lisa CaseyFS 2P247

Kristina HoffmanFS 21802

Tacoma Crime LaboratoryTerry McAdam


Jessie HornbeakPEC0909

Marion BrownPEC0829

B. Joan HollandOA 31742

Chris SewellFS 50902

DNA

Jeremy SandersonFS 41504

Marion ClarkFS 21194

Will DeanFS 31613

Ron WojciechowskiFS 51269

TRACE

Rebecca BrewerFS 21546

Susan WilsonFS 30896

Terry FranklinFS 51189

FIREARMS

Johan SchoemanFS 30843

Brenda LawrenceFS 31569

Carol MorenoLT 21564

Kim HeftonFS 50782

CHEMISTRY

Jane BoysenFS 30844

Tami KeeFS 3

1472 - Part-time

Mary WilsonFS 31627

Maureena DudschusFS 3 - Part-time

1425

Frank BoshearsFS 31190

Vancouver Crime LaboratoryKen McDermott


Sharyl CrabtreePEC0910

Linda EdwardsPEC1734

Bruce SigginsFS 50899

CHEMISTRY

Catherine DunnFS 31650

Jason DunnFS 31193

Sharon HerbelinFS 20904

James CurrieFS 51811

DNA

John DunnFS 31803

David StritzkeFS 21804

Teresa ShankFS 21805

Heather PylesFS 2P250

Stephenie Winter-SermenoFS 51719

DNA

Jennifer DahlbergFS 21725

Trevor ChowenFS 31721

Erica GrahamFS 31722

Caron PruiettFS 31723

Spokane Crime LaboratoryKevin Fortney


Betty KonradPEC0735

Kathy FritzPEC1119

Alexandrea SeaboaltOA 31819

Lisa TurpenFS 51720

DNA

Michael LinFS 21732

Stephen GreenwoodFS 31549

VACANTFS 41662

VACANTFS 11733

Lorraine HeathFS 51552

DNA

Kristi BarrFS 31285

Anna WilsonFS 31199

Denise OlsonFS 30903

VACANTFS 21807

William CulnaneFS 51267

FIREARMS

VACANTFS 40823

Stan McGeeFS 30784

Glenn DavisFS 31814

Jayne AunanFS 51266

CHEMISTRY TRACE

Sheri JenkinsFS 41421

William SchneckFS 40906

Jason StenzelFS 31270

Kevin JenkinsFS 31543

Devon HauseFS 21649

Trevor AllenFS 20824

KENNEWICK LABORATORYCharlie Solomon

FS 50799

CHEMISTRY

Tina LaVillePEC0912

Andrea RicciFS 21628

Jason TriggFS 31554

VACANTFS 30995

Latent Prints LaboratoryRandy Watson


Susan SabilloPEC0951

Robert PruettPEC1736

Jim LuthyFS 31730

Jill ArwineFS 31145

Eileen SlavinFS 31143

Stacey AumanFS 30756

Donald BrannanFS 30892

Courtney WillisFS 20781

Sara TrejoFS 20891

Scott RedheadFS 31144

Crime Scene Response TeamKaren Green

FS 4 - Crime Scene Coordinator1813

Mitch NessanFS 31473

VACANTFS 31467

CODIS LaboratoryJean Johnston


Natasha PrangerFS 41553

Carol VoFS 31817

Monica PriceFS 31726

Sherri PhillipsFS 21724

Robert DorionFS 31670

Stephanie KarczynskiFS 21867

Marianne LessardOA 31866

Toxicology DivisionDr. Fiona CouperState Toxicologist

E163

Toxicology LaboratoryVACANT


Brian CapronFS 51595

Chris JohnstonFS 31591

Lisa NobleFS 31593

Asa LouisFS 31759

Brianna PetersonFS 31795

Christie MitchellFS 21820

Brianne O'ReillyFS 31651

Justin KnoyFS 31728

Melissa PembertonFS 51587

Sarah SwensonFS 31590

Naziha NuwayhidFS 31586

Brittany BallFS 21794

Gwynyth AlmendarezFS 21592

Rebecca FlahertyFS 21589

VACANTFS 31689

VACANTFS 21748

VACANTFS 51821

Jennifer RiceOffice Manager

1727

Robert SmithPEC1583

Mistica StraightPEC1596

Ileah KangOA 31584

Melissa SimpsonOffice Manager

T1727

Jason SklerovQuality Assurance

1634

Amanda BlackFS 41588

Impaired Driving SectionRob ReichertLieutenant

6060

Breath Test ProgramRob SharpeSergeant

6192

Sandy SatoOA 31118

Ken DentonDistrict 2Trooper

6775

Doug JonesDistrict 2Trooper

6776

Mike CheekDistrict 2Trooper

6777

Justin DestitoDistrict 3Trooper

6779

Doug DorichDistrict 3Trooper

6778

Dan MannDistrict 4Trooper

6780

Jon MartinDistrict 6Trooper

6782

Breath Test Program

Randy VranishSergeant

6190

Rod GullbergRA 31783

Ruth CramerDistrict 1

FS 11117

Denny StumphDistrict 1Trooper

6774

Shane MadsenDistrict 5Trooper

6781

Jim Van DiestDistrict 7Trooper

6783

Beth McCourt-ChovilDistrict 7Trooper

6784

Bill BogenDistrict 8

FS 10991

Steve LuceIgnition Interlock

Trooper7325

Detective 7250

Assistnat Commander Llcutcllalll Kcith Ilulltlc),

6054

Detective 6666

Sys, Analyst (non-WSP)

GCDet. 7095

ACADEMY Instructor .3 (CIDIIAD/Acnd)

( CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION ]

1687

I )1\ ' i~l!)n Commander ( 'apulln Michael Dahl

WI!)

Assislant Commander Licutcnant Challcs Lc Blanc

6053

Deteclive 6696

Admin , Asslistanl 3 Ms, Leonard

0886

Detective 6710

Detective 7053

9/212010

Background Unit Manager VACANT

Fiscal Supervisor Lynette Brown

1581

Yim Locke FAI-1388

Lourdes Aspiras FA2 - 0583

Chuck Cline PT2-1128

Bonnie Skean PT2 - 1310

Diane Wauzynski FT2 - 1391

Todd Ramsfield FT2 - 1864

Vacant FAI - 1863

1581

Joe Parks CRT! - 1094

Kristina Davis CRT!-1121

Vacant CRT! - 0770

Identification & Criminal I listory Section Manager Deborah Coli insworth

0759

Joe Simpson Management Analyst I I----l

1051

Fingerprint Supervisor Dayshift

Patrick Gibbs 1146

Jennifer Tardiff OA3 - 1098

Beth Marcoe FPT Lead - 0802

Kelly Hunt PPT2 - 1625

MiMi Davis FPT2 - 1100

Doug Patterson FPT2 - 0393

Kathryn Martin PPTI -1397

Fingerprint Supervisor Nightshift

Roselia Legaspi 1147

Mike Tucker FPLT - 1397

Richard Eng FPT2 - 1309

Stephanie Phipps FPTI - 1603

Joyce Tarver FPT I - 1848

Cathy Bill FPT I - 0755

Shawn Smith FPTI - 0956

Vacant PPTI - 1395

CRIMINAL RECORDS DIVISION ) Divisioll Adlllillslralor

J i III A Ildersoll El50

Crim History Support! SOR Supervisor Carolyn Sanchez

1387

Connie Pekola OA3 - 0953

Kim Johnson CRT2 -1125

Carol Akehurst CRT! - 1123

Jessica Hargrove CRTI - 1127

Suzi Farrington CRTI - 1129

Shaundy Napier CRT! - 0775

Vacant CRTI - 1124

Bryan Stoeser CRT! - 0764

Ronnie Wilson CRT! -1683

Kevin Wolf CRT! -1126

Vacant CRT! - 1052

Admin. Assistant 3 Sarah Battin

1095

Production Supervisor Jennifer Perry

1311

Debra Tafoya * * CRTI - 1390

Vacant CRT! - 1600

Lynn White CIS - 0077

Bill McAllister CIS - 1682

Elaine Hale CIS - 1389

Christian Owens CIS - 1851

Tracy Perkins TPT2 -1306

Lana Smith TPT2 - 0705

Benu Kushan TPT2 - 0010

Steve Simmons TPT2 - 0748

Vacant TPTI - 0716

Vacant TPT2 - 0007

ITO SUPl'ORT Specialists are assigned

to lTD but SU ppor! CRD fu ll time

I ACCESS SUppOI·t

ITS4 Kathy Paulson 0765 ITS4 Jim Manong 131 3 ITS3 Diane FosseU 0955

W2 SUI'PORT ITS5 Cindy Dalesky 1685 ITS4 Rose Clowers 1503 ITS4 Josh Napier 180 I ITS4 Jannice Gordon (NFl 1777 ITS3 Vani Chunduru 1789 ITS3 Rod Bell 1828

W ATCI-I SUPl'ORT ITS4 Venkata Nallama lli 1630

AFIS SUPPORT ITS4 Michelle Kromm 11 22

* Teleworker ** Teleworkers Part Time

*** .5 ACCESS/ .s Pingerprint

CRT I = Correctional Records Techn I CRT2 = Correctional Records Techn 2

CIS = Criminal Ident Specialist PA I = Piscal Analyst I

FPL T = Fingerprint Lead Technician FPTI = Fingerprint Technician I FPT2 = Fingerprint Technician 2

PT2 = Fiscal Technician 2 OA3 = Office Assistant 3 OAL = Office Ass istant Lead

TPTI = Transportation Planning Tech I TPT2 = Transportation Planning Tech 2

7/2812010

ACCESS & Collision Records Criminal Records Division

October 2009

Mr. Jim Anderson Division Administrator

5 0010

ACCESS Section

Heather Anderson Section Manager (WMS 3)

0 01708

Vacant Customer Service Specialist II (35)

0 1398

Collision Records Section

Jim Morelli Transportation Planning Specialist 2 (57)

0 0715

Transportation Planning Tech 2 (48) Tracy Perkins 0 1306 Lana Smith 0 0705 Benu Kushan 0 0010 Sharon Pickard 0 0005 Jane Oldham 0 0746 Kelly Prigge 0 0717 Transportation Planning Tech I (42) Jennifer Norwood 0 0604 Rachel Hawthorne 0 0618 Vacant 0 0716 Steve Simmons 0 0748

Criminal Identification Specialist (52)

Kelli Neely 0 0889 Diane Harrison 0 1541 Lynn White 0 0077 Diane Fossett 0 0955 Bill McAllister 0 1682 Elaine Hale 0 1389 Vacant 0 1851

Info Tech Specialist 4 (62)

Kathy Paulson 0 0765 Jim Manong 0 1313 Rose Clowers 0 1503

Kateri Anderson Information Security Officer

0 1788 WMSII

9/1/2010

Homeland Security Division

Homeland Security DivisionCaptain Mark Thomas

Homeland Security CoordinatorMr. Tyler Ray

Region 2, 3 and K9 UnitLieutenant Scherf

Region1, Traffic, Video and BombLieutenant Brogan

Region 2 K9Sergeant Hash

Region 2 VATSSergeant Johnson

Region 1 K9Sergeant Ashcraft

Region 1 VATSSergeant Schuster

Traffic CadetsSergeant Babb

Admin AssistantMs. Kate Park

Video CadetsSergeant Cain

Bomb SquadTrooper Soper

Region 3 K9Sergeant Jacobson

Region 3 VATSSergeant Jackson

Emergency ManagementCoordinator

Mr. Steve Smeland

Research AnalystMs. Debbie Carter

Canine Unit TrainingSergeant Kintzley

Research AnalystVacant

INVESTIGATIVE ASSISTANCE DIVISION

( ' \ 1''1' ·\ IN 'l'Ii\IO'l'IIY I', IIR \ NIFF

(,1)1 7

IVSI;( '/NARCOTI('S 1.lcutcnanl

(,0'),)

SIVA'I I SI'I:(,IAI. INVI 'S'I I(;A'IIONS J-IclitClldlll

()().)x

91212010

[ OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ]

Internal Affairs Section LIEUTENANT

Rob Huss 6051

ADMINISTRATIVE ASS ISTANT 3 Melinda Brooks

0035

OPS Support Staff ADM INISTRATIVE ASS ISTANT 4

...-----i Denise Poe

Internal Affairs Section LIEUTENANT

Travis Matheson 7306

0750

SECRETARY SENIOR

Vacant 0598

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 3 Vacant

1747

7128/2010

~ ! I , I I

. ~

Trooper Julie B loomfield

6721

Trooper Steve Day

6722

Trooper Darrell Noyes

6724

Trooper David Putnam

6725

Trooper Tracy Latimer

6726

Trooper Chris Bockus

6727

Trooper Dan Tindall

6728

(~ ___ S_P_E_C_IA_L_O_P_E_RA_J_IO __ N_S_D_IV_IS_I_O_N ____ ~]

EXECUTIVE SERVICES SECTION Lieutenant Mark Brogan

6055

-

Trooper Cadet 8922

-Trooper Cadet

8916

Trooper Cadet -8964

Trooper Cadet 8108 -

Trooper Cadet 8976

-Trooper Cadet

8310

Trooper Cadet -8974

Trooper Cadet 8965 -

Trooper Cadet 8968

Trooper Cadet -8913

Admin. Assl. 3 Robyn Knight

0027

Trooper Herbert Jackson

6719

Trooper John Atkinson

6715

Trooper Andres Gore

6714

Trooper C. Brian Smith

6717

Trooper Gene Huguenin

6718

Trooper Elliott George

7265

Trooper Ronald Somerville

7020

Trooper Joshua Williams

6720

CAPTAIN Mark ( 'ouey

W20

Trooper Reginald Woods

7267

Trooper Gary Day

7021

Trooper Cadet 8118

Trooper Cadet 8931

Trooper Cadet 8970

Trooper Cadet 8919

A VIA TION SECTION Lieutenant Tri stan Atkins

6056

Trooper Pilot Paul Speckmaier

6732

Trooper Pilot Scott Sborov

6731

Trooper Pilot Jeff Hatteberg

6729

Trooper Pilot Scott Sweeney

7023

Trooper Pilot Troy Davis

7155

Trooper Pilot Johnny Montemayor

6733

Reserve Pilot - EW A Maurice Goodall

6503 (D6)

Reserve Pilot - EW A Monty Colver

6123

Admin. Assl. 3 Aloha Watson

003 1

Jet Aircraft Tech Charles Francisco

1066

Jet Aircraft Tech Gary Bade

1151

Jet Aircraft Tech Brian Lord

0319

7/2812010

Communications Division

Position Numbers

9/2/2010

Updated August 2010

Interim Division AdministratorMark Wilton

Position #: E145

Secretary AdministrativeShirley Mott

Position #: 0100

Division Assistant AdministratorVacant

Position #: 0152

InterimTraining/ Recruiting CoordinatorCO 4 Carri Gordon

Position #: 0004

CAD Administrator/ TrainerITS 4 Jim Hill

Position #: 1654

D2 Communications MgrCO 4 Jo Baumgartner

Position #: 0587

D1 Communications MgrCO 4 Laurie Langlois

Position #: 0850

D3 Communications MgrCO 4 Gini Wortman

Position #: 0870

D4 Communications MgrCO 4 LaDonna Browell

Position #: 0875

D5 Communications MgrCO 4 Delma McNulty

Position #: 0865

D6 Communications MgrInterim CO 4Kevin Baird

Position #: 0874

D7 Communications MgrCO 4 Larry Borrell

Position #: 0143

D8 Communications MgrCO 4 Monte Simpson

Position #: 0135

Assistant Training OfficerCO 2 Dolores Blas-Cazeras

Position #: 0857

TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU ELECTRONIC SERVICES DIVISION

ROBERT A. SCHWENT

EFF: Feb. 1,2010

~~~D"'3.'.' ~~~~Dlsl2.7 ~ ESDWH

~rm=.~~ '657

IniurmllllDn T.m. SI!Ko 3 AooIIu N.twoi1l. ,. ..

1""=!1~·3 , ... 1~1~·3 , ...

Captain Jay Cabezuela

HRD COMMANDER

7311

Debb Chavira HR Program Manager

(WMS Band 2)

FLSB, FPB, ISB, OOC

1331

Jennifer Nuse

Safety Officer 2

1839

Sherry Moe

HRC 3

DIVERSITY, RA, ADA

1577

Darlonna Vaughan

HRC 2

FPB,, ISB

0962

Vacant

HRCA 2

FPB, ISB

0028

Melissa Rasmussen

HRC 2

FLSB, OOC

0661

Vacant

HRCA 2

FLSB, OOC

1037

Pat Marshall HR Program Manager

(WMS Band 2)

FOB, TSB

0966

Yvette Jones

HRC 3

L&I, TDL, RA, FMLA

0048

Amber McLaughlin

HRCA 2

L&I, TDL, RA, FMLA

1333

Yvette Fabregas

HRC 2

FOB

0734

Shawn Dubler

HRCA 2

FOB

1332

Vacant

HRC 2

TSB

0858

Melodie Wulfekuhle

NON-PERM HRC 2

TSB

1090

Sergeant Eric Killian

Polygraph Background Unit

6194

Trooper Detective William Tufts

6790

William Rose

HRC 3 Background Investigator

1646

Trooper Steven M. Reichert

6788

Trooper Jon C. Galde

6786

Trooper Jerry Kuzminsky

7288

Trooper Mark W. Rauhut

7295

Trooper Kevin P. Isom

9038

Trooper Michael S. Michelbrink

9023

Sergeant Johnny Alexander

Recruiting Unit

6193

Trooper Tina Wallman

East Side Recruiter

7282

Sergeant Charles Clark

Testing Unit

7296

Trooper Bryan Broyles

Trooper Coordinator

7056

Trooper Dena Hazuka

Trooper Coordinator

6785

Angie Bradford

HRCA 2, Cadet Unit

1182

Jennifer Kraft


1326

Shari Holt

Customer Service Specialist 1

0686

Human Resource Division

July 2010

Division Administrator- CTO -

Marty Knorr#E142 315

Support ServicesTom Wallace

WMS3 #1081 315

HEAT AdministratorNo fill

ITT1 #0133 315

Applications Manager

Pat RamsdellWMS2 #0930 315

Cust Serv ManagerChuck Bishop

WMS2 #1165 315

Integrated SystemsServer Manager

Corie WadeWMS2 #0683 315

Office ManagerArcelia MathisenOM #0034 315 Technical Architect

Brian EversonITS6 #1537 315

Project Off MgrMichael York

WMS3 #1317 315

Project ManagerSteve Cole

ITS5 #1111 315

Project ManagerJohn Bruun

WMS2 #0665 315

Project ManagerPaula Breshears

WMS2 #1055 315

Project ManagerSteve Brown

ITS4 #1400 315

Admin Supportvacant

OA3 #0861 ufuf See Page 2

FA 2vacant

FA1 #1251 315/380

Prod/Quality SpvrSharon Trivett

ITS6 #1753 315

BES,ListservNo fill

ITS5 #0008 315

ICDV, DHCP,ALPRRoy Marsh

ITS5 #0982 315

AD,CSA, WSUSAndy AmendelaITS5 #1338 315

Server SupportDBA/Storage

Dan TormanenITS5 #1566 315

Exchange, OWABill Harwell

ITS5 #1416 315

SCIOM,WSUSChris Molenda

ITS3 #1164 315

SECTOR, SFTP,DHCP, ALPRWade Stringer

ITS4 #1056 315

MOSS, HEATRene’ Hoopes

ITS3 #1336 315

FLSB SupportSandra DistefanoITS5 #1585 FLSB

SCCM, PrintersTracy Dike

ITS5 #0762 315

CAD, HEATRon Shell

ITS4 #1109 315

PROJECT andPLANNING

INFRASTRUCTURE &SECURITY TEAM

PRODUCTION SERVICES TEAM

, DBA, MOSSJames Coe

ITS5 #1316 315

Washington State PatrolTSB/ITD 03 03 10

Page 1

CRD LiaisonPosition cut

WMS 2 #0856 315

Function movedFLSB Liaison

Johanna NoedelWMS2 #1427 FLSB

See Page 3

CAD AdministratorJim Hill

ITS 4 1654 ???

AFIS AdminVacant

ITS 4 #1122 ID240

Disaster RecoverySuzanne Nott

ITS5 #1752 315

Applications ManagerPat RamsdellFrom Page 1

ASU SupervisorTania Johnson

ITS6 #1831 0315

WADS SupervisorVairakkumar Vairaperumal

ITS5 #1571 315

Remedy SpvrJulie ParkinITS5 #1555

FOB/315

IDEAS SupervisorJeremy HagquistITS5 #0763 315

W2 SupervisorCindy Dalesky

ITS5 #1685 240

CVD SupervisorKen Keiper

ITS5 #P202 MCX

CVD SupportWil Armagost

ITS4 #P125 MCX

CVD SupportChip Rasmus

ITS4 #P031 MCX

CVD SupportRob Stevens

ITS3 #P081 MCX

Web DevelopmentKent HernandezITS4 #0176 315

Web DevelopmentJessica James

ITS3 #0162 315

RAD ProgrammerKeith Huynh

ITS4 #0669 315

RAD ProgrammerNam-Tran TranITS4 #1085 365

WATCH PrgmrVenkata Nallamalli

ITS4 #1630 240

ProgrammerMark Ross

ITS4 #1108 315

ProgrammerLong Huynh

ITS4 #1183 315

.NET ProgrammerVacant

ITS3 #1107 315

SECTOR SupportCrystal Henson

ITS4 #1835 0315

LIMS Tech SuppEric Schaller

ITS4 #1358 FLSB

TOX SupportNai-Chie Melody YuITS4 #1754 FLSB

Breath Test SuppCraig Niiyama

ITS3 #0992 FLSBCVD SupportMarlene Park

ITS2 #1173 CVD

SECTOR SupportReasmei SoeungITS4 #1834 0315

Remedy DevelopDebra PetermanITS3 #1367 315

W2 ProgrammerJannice GordonITS4 #1177 315

W2 ProgrammerJosh Napier

ITS4 #1801 240

W2 ProgrammerRod Bell

ITS3 #1828 AW240

W2 ProgrammerVani ChunduruITS3 #1789 240

ACCESS SupportKathy Paulson

ITS4 #0765 ACC

ACCESS SupportJim Manong

ITS4 #1313 ACC

WADS TEAM

REMEDY TEAM

W2 - ACCESS GROUPIDEAS TEAM

CVD TEAM

FADS SupervisorVacant/pending

ITS5 #1818 FLSB

Web DevelopmentDon Mikler

ITS3 #1832 0315

FADS TEAM

Page 2

.NET ProgrammerLinda Jetton

ITS2 #1846 0315

Remedy DevelopJohn Ring

ITS4 #1847 0315

DINS Supportcut

ITS4 #1822 0217

W2 Systems AdminEmine Clowers

ITS4 #1503 ACC


Johanna NoedelTemporary Supervisor

ACCESS SupportDiane Fosset

ITS 4 #???? ACC

Cust Serv Manager

Chuck BishopFrom Page 1

Cust Serv Spvr T1Melissa Chambers

ITS5 #0632 315

Cust Serv Spvr T2Tina Simmons

ITS5 #1833 0315

CS ACCESS LeadSteve Collins

ITS3 #0769 315

Customer ServiceLinda Prouty

ITS2 #0663 315

Customer ServiceRhett DellingerITS2 #0641 315

Customer ServiceKimberly StewartITS2 #0881 315

Customer ServiceJoshua McCoyITS2 #1163 315

Customer ServiceBen Carruth

ITS2 #1101 315

Customer ServiceKen Plute

ITS2 #0633 315

Customer ServiceBruce Bexell

ITS2 #0009 315

Customer ServiceJames JourdanITS2 #0800 315

Customer ServiceBernadette FongITS2 #0801 315

Tier 1

Customer ServiceDara Brooks

ITS4 #0662 315

Customer ServiceGeorge LaVigneITS4 #1366 315

Customer ServiceVacant

ITS4 #0713 315

Customer ServiceHolly Dahl

ITS3 #0836 315

Customer ServicePatrick Horan

ITS3 #0766 315

CS eTRIP SupportMike Marcott

ITS3 #1830 0315

FLSB Inst. SupportGalina Shepel

ITS3 #P227 Grnt

STR/PurchasingDebbie Grulke

ITS5 #1104 315

CS PurchasingShawn Cruz

ITS2 #1167 315

Tier 2

Purchasing


Page 3

Washington State Patrol

Property Management Division


Updated: 02/17/10

W:\PROPMGMT\Emergency Planning\PMD Org Chart.ppt

Julie Hannah

Inventory Control Officer

0620 C

Theresa Jensen

Procurement & Supply

Spec 2

0925 C

Kim Gustafson


Spec 2

1166 C

Rick Flores


Spec 2

0017 C

Bill MacMillan

Warehouse Operator 4

0355 C

Tom Legun


0451 C

Jim Kelly


0988 C

Arel Solie

Division Commander

E137 A

Dennis Quinsey

Facilities Mgmt Administrator

1249 A

Betty Stanek

Secretary Senior (Supply)

1288 C

Erica Soha

Office Assistant 3 (Fleet)

0706 C

Brenda Biscay

Office Assistant 3 (Facilities)

1334 C

Rachel Grayless

Fiscal Analyst 1

1065 C

Cherylee Bouche

Office Manager

1327 C

Paul Stray

Fleet Manager

0621 A

Christine Fox

Supply Manager

1155 A

John Bob Peterson

Law Enforcement

Communications Supervisor

0701 A

VACANT

Construction & Maintenance

Superintendent 2

0612 C

James Gilbert

Construction Project Coord 3

0927 A

Tracy Boyer

Construction Project Mgr 2

0413 C

Richard Duke

Mechanical Engineer Sr.

0327 A

Greg Parriott


Superintendent 2

1260 C

Gavin Rice

Maintenance Mechanic 4

1328 B

Jon Grayless


0894 B

Joe Frost


0890 B

Thomas Powell


0359 C

Patty Blowers

Custodian 1

1409 C

Manuel Sierra

Custodian 1

1476 C

Lee Pennington


0054 C

Dan Warner


0354 C

Curtis Beckham


0322 C

ACADEMY

Jim Marshall


1082 C

DISTRICT 1

VACANT


0367 C

Dan LaFreniere


0979 C

Dave Cromer


0328 C

Bob Grayless


0326 C

Kevin Drake


0672 B

DISTRICT VII

VACANT


1329 C

DISTRICT VII

Jerry Desaulniers

Custodian 2

1276 C

DISTRICT II

Dave Bibby


1149 C

DISTRICT VIII

Jim Peralta


1150 CDISTRICT V

Monte Ward


0362 C

Tracy Warren

Equipment Technician 5

0335 A

Casmir Kryzanowski

Equipment Lane Supervisor

0335 A

Raymond Risch

Equipment Parts Specialist

0331 C

Gary Ritchie


0611 C

Quang Tuong


0839 C

Robert Platz


1102 C

Dale Rankin


0333 C

VACANT

AUTO MECHANIC

0924 C

Gary Armstrong

Auto Body Technician

0332 C

Darrell Barnes

Shelton Equipment

Technician 3

1103 C

Jesus Nieves

Lead Installer

1250 C

Paul Ingram

Installer

0699 C

Ryan Parypa

Installer

1540 C

William Rubino

Installer

0846 C

William Garrido

Installer

0985 C

Curt Danell

Installer

1339 C

Gerald Thorsell

Installer

0157 C

John Brown

Installer

9646 C

Perry Inks

Bellevue Equipment

Technician 3

0987 C

Judy Smith

Contracts Specialist

0024 A

A = Exception

B = Nonscheduled

C = Scheduled

Jim Zeppa


Spec 1

1716 C

Tanyah Williams

Management Analyst 1

0965 C

Sarah Anderson

Fiscal Tech 2

0334 C

Charice Pidcock

Division Analyst

1617 A

Darron Hartman


Superintendent 2

0329 C

Tom Lindahl

Civil Engineer 3

0958 A

Alan Spahr


0324 C

Les Frogner


0330 C

Greg Champlin


0065 C

L. Jim Anderson


0831 B

Greg Johnson


1539 C

Bob Hamilton


1563 C

Fred Brusco

Painter

0634 C

DISTRICT IV

Randy Lucas


0361 C

DISTRICT III

Ken Parrish


0360 C

DISTRICT VI

Yvonne Taylor


0365 C

8/2/10

RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Dr. Donald Sorenson Division Administrator

E0155

Sgt. Robert Turk Evidence Control Officer

6198

Gretchen DolanPublic Records Officer –

WMS2 0648

Tammy Usher Admin. Services Manager –

WMS1 0687

Kristin YoungForms/Records Analyst 3

0967

Patricia GeppertOffice Assistant 3

1283

David GrenierCommunications Consultant 1

1038

Trooper CadetSeth Flores-Chambers

Front Desk 8923

Lila KirkebyStrategic Planning/

Performance Manager – WMS21462

Jennifer MeyerManagement Analyst 3

0026

Stephanie BryantManagement Analyst 2

0161

VACANTPublic Disc. Coordinator – D1

0018

Duane UngursPublic Disc. Coordinator – D2

0585

Bonnie BerndtPublic Disc. Coordinator – D3

1206

Karol HoffmanPublic Disc. Coordinator – D4

0033

Gail BehrensPublic Disc. Coordinator – D5

0695

Susan MullenPublic Disc. Coordinator – D6

1074

Berta Fuentes EspigaPublic Disc. Coordinator – D7

0019

Rebecca BringhamPublic Disc. Coordinator – D8

1211

Trooper CadetJason Barry Front Desk

8104

WASHINGTON STATE PATROL TRAINING DIVISION

July 2010

CAPT LAMOREAUX COMMANDER-0014

LT GUNKEL ASST CMNDR-0077

MS GALLAGHER SEC SPRVSR-0045

MS LEWIS CSS 2-0358

VACANT OA 3-1080

MS PATTERSON OA LEAD-0630

SGT (VACANT) CIC

SGT MATAGI SUPERVISOR-0105

SGT ARNOLD SUPERVISOR-0258

MR MARSHALL PLANT MECH-1082

MS PIPER FOOD MGR-0710

MR BARNES MECHANIC-1103

CPL BLANKERS INSTR-0540

CPL LEWIS INSTR-1014

CPL LUDLOW INSTR-0903

MS ANDERSON CUSTODIAN 2-0364

TPR COZZITORTO RAI-0745

TPR HOSHINO RAI-0840

TPR WARD RAI-0600

MR MCGUIRE COOK 2-1275

MS FLOWERS COOK 1-N0703

MS SCHAEFFER COOK 1-1340

MS SYTSMA COOK 1-0357

MS GRAHAM COOK 1-0703

CPL RICHMOND INSTR-1028

CPL SPURLING INSTR-0524

MR KRAMER GNSS 3-1079

TPR BARGER RAI-0312

CPL LAUR INSTR-1140

TPR DEVERE RAI-0401

MS MOORE COOK 1-1078

CPL VARKEVISSER INSTR-0945

MR HITCHMAN CUSTODIAN 2-1120

CPL CAGLE INSTR-0358

TPR HARSCHFELD INSTR-0498

CVEO 2 WIESE INSTR-X734

TPR METCALF INSTR-0407

VACANT CJTC INSTR

CPL PROUTY INSTR-1043 TPR VAUGHAN

INSTR-0883

CPL DELL INSTR-0487

10 Field Force 60 Criminal Investigation Division 10 Crime Lab 05 FPB Admin 23 Government Media Relations 90 Communications Division11 Billable Contracts 61 CID Special Projects 11 Crime Lab Grants 10 FPB Preparedness Division 45 Collision Records 91 Communication Contracts15 DUI Cost Recovery 65 Special Investigations 15 State Tox Lab 11 Fire Mobe Volunteers 75 Executive Protection20 Aviation 12 Fire Mobe Career 76 EPS - GA Contracts21 83 King Air 13 Fire Mobe - Other State Agencies 77 EPS - L&I Contracts31 DOT Master Contracts 14 Fire Mobe - WSP FPB Staff 78 EPS - Archive Bldg Security 43 Central Services Charges35 Breath Test 80 ISB Admin. 20 Investigative Assistance Division 15 FPB Prevention Division 65 Budget and Fiscal Services36 DRE Program 25 Meth Response 40 Fire Training Academy 70 Office of the Chief37 DRE Contracts 81 Cascade HIDTA 41 ARFF 71 OPS40 Disability 83 WSIN 42 FTA Dorm COP 15 ITD 72 Risk Management45 Traffic Safety Contracts 85 Marijuana Erad 50 Grants and Contracts 16 Tech. Staffing & Tools90 Homeland Security Division 87 DEA Task Forces 60 Basic Firefighter Training 17 Standardized Tech91 Homeland Security Grants 88 Misc. Task Forces 80 ESD

89 CTED Narcotics Contracts 81 ESD Special Projects 20 Training Division90 Missing Children 88 SIEC 21 Academy Contracts

71 LETPP - State Share 89 ACCESS Network Support 42 Human Resource Division 50 CVE Section 72 LETPP Projects53 MCSAP Base Grants54 New Entrants (MCSAP)55 MCSAP Special Grants 30 ACCESS 51 Fleet57 Hazmat Contracts 40 Identification Section 52 Supply70 VIN 41 Criminal History Projects 55 Pursuit Vehicles 95 TSB Admin

56 CVD/CID Vehicles57 Mission Vehicles62 Facilities63 PMD Contracts

TSB Admin07

Property Management03

05

06

Information Technology

Field Ops Group Criminal Investigation Division

Investigative Assistance Division

02

Training Division

Administrative Division01

Communications04

Office of the Chief

01

Commercial Vehicle Division

03

02

ISB Admin04

Budget Structure2009-2011 Biennium

Technical Services Bureau030

Field Operation Bureau010


Investigative Services Bureau020

03

Fire Protection Bureau04

Forensic Laboratory Division01

Homeland Security05

Criminal Records Division

02

BASS - BDS033 State of Washington

Agency Performance Measure

Incremental Estimates for the Biennial Budget

Agency: 225 Washington State Patrol Budget Period: 2011-13

9/1/2010 Page 1 of 1

Activity: A009 Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations

Outcome Measures 001014 Number of fatalities on state routes and interstates FY 2012 FY 2013 PL AI Field Force Staffing ( 2.00) ( 2.00)

Reduce preventable loss of life, injury, or property through enforcement efforts. Outcome Measures 001628 Average duration of 90 minute closures on the 9-key interstates and state routes FY 2012 FY 2013 PL AG Mobile Office Platform ( 7.00) ( 7.00)

Improve statewide mobility of people, good and services. Output Measures 001024 Percentage of trooper patrol vehicles with laptop computers/SECTOR FY 2012 FY 2013 PL AG Mobile Office Platform 6.00% 6.00%

Reduce preventable loss of life, injury, or property through enforcement efforts. Output Measures 001037 Percentage of eligible patrol vehicles with in-car digital video units FY 2012 FY 2013 PL AG Mobile Office Platform 4.00% 23.00%

Reduce preventable loss of life, injury, or property through enforcement efforts.


% Allocation Dollars Allocated Dollars Allocated Total AllocatedReceived FY 2012 FY 2013

A001 Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement 0.9% 370,920 395,820 766,740 A002 Agency Administration 1.9% 821,600 876,830 1,698,430 A003 Collision Records 0.1% 28,330 28,570 56,900 A004 Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement 12.6% 5,449,710 5,889,750 11,339,460 A005 Crime Laboratory 8.5% 3,702,070 3,950,625 7,652,695 A006 Criminal Records Management 4.8% 2,101,060 2,242,100 4,343,160 A007 Executive Protection 1.9% 847,460 904,360 1,751,820 A008 Fire Protection Services 0.5% 197,180 210,420 407,600 A009 Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations 47.2% 20,381,681 22,027,307 42,408,988 A010 Impaired Driving 1.1% 488,280 521,100 1,009,380 A011 Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement 3.8% 1,636,250 1,746,090 3,382,340 A012 Missing Children Recovery 0.5% 234,760 250,510 485,270 A013 Specialized Outreach Fire Services 2.2% 943,710 1,007,080 1,950,790 A014 Toxicology Laboratory 1.5% 650,260 693,950 1,344,210 A015 Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation 3.7% 1,583,760 1,711,610 3,295,370 A016 Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Inspection 0.9% 375,630 405,970 781,600 A017 Transportation Budget Capital Projects 4.2% 1,885,000 1,885,000 3,770,000 A018 Homeland Security 3.9% 1,664,950 1,799,390 3,464,340

Total 100.0% 43,362,611$ 46,546,482$ 89,909,093$

Indirect activity costs allocated (through Policy Level): Financial Management/Revolving Accounts 10,236,481$ 14,244,405$ Human Resources Management 1,389,144 1,450,220 Information Technology/Electronic Services 20,704,071 19,541,170 Law Enforcement Training 2,019,802 2,029,256 Capital/Misc 2,061,200 2,241,955 Property Management, Supply, Fleet Management, Mission Vehicles 6,951,913 7,039,476

Total indirect activity costs allocated: 43,362,611$ 46,546,482$

89,909,093$

Activity

Activity Inventory Indirect Cost Allocation ApproachPrimary Indirect Activities

Allocation Method Description: Agency indirect activities include Financial Management, Human Resources Management, Information Technology/Electronic Services, Law Enforcement Training, and those portions of Property Management not attributable to specific direct activities. The costs for the indirect activities were allocated to direct activities based on the number of FTEs in each direct activity. The totals allocated for each indirect activity are listed below.



A001 Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement - 199,050 158,480 357,530 A002 Agency Administration - - - - A003 Collision Records - - - - A004 Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement Actual 960,230$ 732,100$ 1,692,330$ A005 Crime Laboratory - - - - A006 Criminal Records Management - - - - A007 Executive Protection - - - - A008 Fire Protection Services - - - - A009 Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations Actual 15,553,460$ 14,252,500$ 29,805,960 A010 Impaired Driving - - - - A011 Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement - - - - A012 Missing Children Recovery - - - - A013 Specialized Outreach Fire Services - - - - A014 Toxicology Laboratory - - - - A015 Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation Actual 279,060 212,760 491,820 A016 Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Inspection Actual 66,190 50,460 116,650 A017 Transportation Budget Capital Projects - - - - A018 Homeland Security Actual 1,033,020 822,500 1,855,520

Total 18,091,010$ 16,228,800$ 34,319,810$

Activity

Activity Inventory Indirect Cost Allocation ApproachCentralized Pursuit Vehicle Acquisition and Maintenance

Allocation Method Description: The Property Management Division is considered an indirect activity except for the centralized vehicle budgets for pursuit vehicle acquisition and maintenance for the direct activities. This portion of the budget wasallocated back to the contributing direct activities.



A001 Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement 1.0% 105,080 115,330 220,410 A002 Agency Administration - - - A003 Collision Records - - - A004 Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement 17.0% 1,785,030 1,959,140 3,744,170 A005 Crime Laboratory - - - A006 Criminal Records Management - - - A007 Executive Protection 2.3% 240,090 263,510 503,600 A008 Fire Protection Services - - - A009 Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations 63.7% 6,675,886 7,327,064 14,002,950 A010 Impaired Driving 1.3% 138,340 151,830 290,170 A011 Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement 4.4% 463,550 508,770 972,320 A012 Missing Children Recovery - - - A013 Specialized Outreach Fire Services - - - A014 Toxicology Laboratory - - - A015 Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation 5.0% 518,750 569,350 1,088,100 A016 Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Inspection - - - A017 Transportation Budget Capital Projects - - - A018 Homeland Security 5.2% 545,350 598,540 1,143,890

Total 100.0% 10,472,076$ 11,493,534$ 21,965,610$

Activity

Activity Inventory Indirect Cost Allocation ApproachCommunications

Allocation Method Description: The Communications Division is considered an indirect activity and was allocated based on FTEs in those primary law enforcement activities employing commissioned personnel.


Recommendation Summary 3:40:41PM

Agency: 225 Washington State Patrol 9/1/2010 Dollars in Thousands Annual Average General FTEs Fund State Other Funds Total Funds 2009-11 Current Biennium Total 2,420.5 75,036 421,926 496,962 CL 01 Fire Service Training Academy Maint (136) (136) CL 02 King Air Maintenance (530) (530) CL 03 Meth Response Team 1,360 1,360 CL 04 Investigative Services Division 600 600 CL 05 Additional Federal Funds (1,960) (1,960) CL 06 Consumer Loan Companies (2) (2) CL 07 Additional Federal Seizure Auth (77) (77) CL 08 Cigarette Reduced Ignition Program (14) (14) CL 09 Real Estate License Background Chk 2.0 52 52 CL 10 Eliminate Fire Protection Board CL 11 Criminal Records Fund Shift CL 12 Forensic Sciences Improvement 288 288 CL 13 Criminal Records Funding 2,000 (2,000) CL 14 Post-conviction DNA Analysis 312 312 CL 15 Restore Crime Lab Equipment Funding (110) (110) (220) CL 16 Criminal Background Checks 0.3 18 18 CL 17 Vehicle License Fraud 186 186 CL 20 Transportation - Minor Works (1,626) (1,626) CL 21 Shelton Regional Water Plan (1,500) (1,500) CL 22 Restore Trooper Funding (1,184) (1,184) CL 23 Additional Local/Federal Authority (8) (8) CL 24 Cancellation of Cadet Class 5,516 5,516 CL 25 Breath Test Instruments (400) (400) CL 26 Traffic Safety Camera Pilot (370) (370) CL 27 Trooper Class (3,601) (3,601) CL 28 Fuel Rate Adjustment 1,323 1,323 CL 29 Biennialize Health Insurance Rate 613 2,477 3,090 CL 30 Pension Rate Biennialization 1 9 10 CL 31 Restore Temporary Layoffs 243 243 Total Carry Forward Level 2,422.8 79,501 418,831 498,332 Percent Change from Current Biennium .1% 6.0% (.7)% .3% M1 90 Maintenance Level Revenue Carry Forward plus Workload Changes 2,422.8 79,501 418,831 498,332 Percent Change from Current Biennium .1% 6.0% (.7)% .3% M2 8F Fuel Rate Adjustment 20 184 204 M2 9X Self Insurance Premium 288 957 1,245 M2 AF Return CAD Debt Service Funding 1 (573) (572) Total Maintenance Level 2,422.8 79,810 419,399 499,209 Percent Change from Current Biennium .1% 6.4% (.6)% .5% PL AA Fingerprint Record Conversion 805 805 PL AB Criminal History Record Retention 200 200 PL AC DNA Kits 935 128 1,063 PL AD Out of Service Order Penalties

PL AE Notary Service Fee Increase PL AG Mobile Office Platform 7.0 950 7,291 8,241 PL AH Pursuit Vehicle Replacement 4.3 5,238 5,238 PL AI Field Force Staffing 46.7 90 10,093 10,183 PL AJ Minor Works 670 670 PL AK Fire Training Academy Funding 345 345 PL AR Regional Water & Sewer System 3,100 3,100 Subtotal - Performance Level Changes 58.0 1,975 27,870 29,845 2011-13 Total Proposed Budget 2,480.7 81,785 447,269 529,054 Percent Change from Current Biennium 2.5% 9.0% 6.0% 6.5% M1 90 Maintenance Level Revenue Revenue estimates. M2 8F Fuel Rate Adjustment The Washington State Patrol operates a fleet of 1,546 vehicles that consume an average of 163,500 gallons of fuel each month. The vehicles are used for traffic law enforcement and emergency response activities, along with specialized functions and general transportation. An increase to our vehicle fuel budget is necessary to support current levels of travel miles and enforcement activity. While this request primarily impacts the Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations activity, it also impacts virtually every other agency activity. M2 9X Self Insurance Premium The Washington State Patrol's risk management premiums paid to the state's Risk Management Pool will increase from $8,341,815 in the 2009-11 Biennium to $9,586,548 in the 2011-13 Biennium. We request $1,244,733 to cover the increase in our self-insurance premium for the 2011-13 Biennium. This proposal impacts all activities. M2 AF Return CAD Debt Service Funding The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has an ongoing appropriation in the amount of $572,000 from the Enhanced 911 (E-911) Account to make debt service payments on a Certificate of Participation for our Computer Aided Dispatch System. Those payments are ending in the 2009-11 Biennium and WSP no longer needs this appropriation. This request returns the funding. In the 2009-11 Biennium, we erroneously received funding for compensation adjustments for the Communications Division from the E-911 Account. This decision package asks for a fund switch between the E-911 Account, GF-State and the State Patrol Highway Account. This proposal impacts all activities. PL AA Fingerprint Record Conversion As the state's criminal history repository, the Washington State Patrol has nearly 1.6 million fingerprint records stored electronically in the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) operated by the Western Identification Network (WIN). These records are used in the identification of both criminal and applicant subjects. About 700,000 of these records are stored in an aged, vendor proprietary electronic format. This proposal is for one-time funding to convert these older fingerprint records to a national standard electronic format. This proposal affects the Criminal Records Management activity. PL AB Criminal History Record Retention The Washington State Patrol Identification and Criminal History Section is the state's repository for criminal history record information received from law enforcement agencies, correctional facilities, and courts throughout the state. The current system used to store and retrieve the over 500,000 criminal history documents received annually is inefficient, aged, and failing. This proposal will fund hiring a vendor to work with the Washington State Patrol, Department of Information Services, and the Secretary of State to develop a feasibility study for replacing the current criminal history record archive and retrieval system. This proposal affects the Criminal Records Management activity. PL AC DNA Kits The requests from police agencies for DNA analysis by the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division (CLD) have increased by 30% in recent years with no subsequent increase in funding for DNA kits and supplies. This, coupled with a 26% increase in DNA costs has created a shortfall in the CLD budget. WSP has temporarily covered the shortfall by holding scientist positions vacant and delaying equipment replacement, but cannot sustain this adjustment long-term. Ongoing funding in the amount of $1,063,000 per biennium for DNA kits and supplies is critical and is being requested to ensure that forensic scientists have sufficient supplies to keep up with the increasing demand for DNA casework services. This proposal impacts the Crime Laboratory activity.

PL AD Out of Service Order Penalties The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has reported a conflict between the Federal Regulation CFR 383.53(b)(1) and state law governing penalties for a driver and carrier who violate an out of service order. The Washington State Patrol is proposing legislation to resolve this conflict by increasing the amount that may be charged for an Out of Service Order Penalty to be consistent with the federal regulation. This proposal affects State Patrol Highway Account revenue only. PL AE Notary Service Fee Increase This decision package requests an increase in the notary service fee that the Washington State Patrol charges for certain background checks. This fee increase is based on our recently completed Background Check Rate Study. PL AG Mobile Office Platform The Washington State Patrol (WSP) seeks funding to fully deploy and sustain the Mobile Office Platform (MOP) concept with an in-car computer with the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) application and digital video system for every trooper's patrol vehicle. This proposal will demonstrate that the program will have significant impact on officer efficiency and data accuracy, officer and public safety, and liability mitigation. This request impacts all activities. PL AH Pursuit Vehicle Replacement The Washington State Patrol operates a fleet of 1,546 vehicles, 836 of which are pursuit vehicles. Our vehicles are used for direct law enforcement and emergency response activities as well as specialized functions and general transportation. This proposal seeks funding to implement a plan that maintains pursuit vehicle replacement at 110,000 miles. This request impacts the Highway Traffic Enforcement activity. PL AI Field Force Staffing This proposal is to provide funding for 56.5 additional commissioned FTEs and 10.3 civil service FTEs (phased in over two years) to fully staff the Washington State Patrol (WSP) Field Operations Bureau (FOB) and provide dispatcher support to the new troopers. PL AJ Minor Works The 2011-13 Washington State Patrol Capital Budget Request will include State Patrol Highway funded Minor Works totaling $670,000. PL AK Fire Training Academy Funding The Washington State Patrol's Fire Training Academy (FTA) seeks funding for the regular maintenance of the facility's roads and water system. Funding for these essential activities was provided through a one-time appropriation in the 2009-11 Operating Budget as these activities had been funded in previous biennia in our Capital Budget. Maintenance of the facility's roads and water system are annual, ongoing activities. The maintenance of these systems is critical to the operation of the FTA, which provides essential firefighter training to agencies and organizations across the state of Washington. PL AR Regional Water & Sewer System The 2011-13 Washington State Patrol (WSP) Capital Project budget request will include $3,100,000 for Regional Water and Sewer System at the WSP Shelton Training Academy.


Recommendation Summary

3:50:44PM

Agency: 225 Washington State Patrol 9/1/2010 Dollars in Thousands Annual Average General

FTEs Fund State Other Funds Total Funds Program: 010 Field Operations Bureau 2009-11 Current Biennium Total 1,471.0 6,017 244,356 250,373

CL 02 King Air Maintenance (530) (530) CL 17 Vehicle License Fraud 186 186

CL 22 Restore Trooper Funding (1,184) (1,184)

CL 23 Additional Local/Federal Authority (8) (8)

CL 24 Cancellation of Cadet Class 5,516 5,516

CL 25 Breath Test Instruments (400) (400)

CL 26 Traffic Safety Camera Pilot (370) (370)

CL 27 Trooper Class (3,601) (3,601)

CL 29 Biennialize Health Insurance Rate 104 1,806 1,910

CL 30 Pension Rate Biennialization 1 9 10

CL 31 Restore Temporary Layoffs 243 243

Total Carry Forward Level 1,471.0 5,835 246,310 252,145 (3.0)% .8% .7% Percent Change from Current Biennium

Carry Forward plus Workload Changes 1,471.0 5,835 246,310 252,145 (3.0)% .8% .7% Percent Change from Current Biennium

Total Maintenance Level 1,471.0 5,835 246,310 252,145 (3.0)% .8% .7% Percent Change from Current Biennium

PL AG Mobile Office Platform 3 317 320

PL AI Field Force Staffing 42.3 71 6,999 7,070

Subtotal - Performance Level Changes 42.3 74 7,316 7,390 2011-13 Total Proposed Budget 1,513.2 5,909 253,626 259,535 Percent Change from Current Biennium 2.9% (1.8)% 3.8% 3.7%



3:50:44PM


FTEs Fund State Other Funds Total Funds Program: 020 Investigative Services Bureau 2009-11 Current Biennium Total 402.0 46,171 60,330 106,501

CL 01 Fire Service Training Academy Maint (136) (136) CL 03 Meth Response Team 1,360 1,360

CL 04 Investigative Services Division 600 600

CL 05 Additional Federal Funds (1,960) (1,960)

CL 06 Consumer Loan Companies 1 (2) (1)

CL 07 Additional Federal Seizure Auth (77) (77)

CL 08 Cigarette Reduced Ignition Program 2 (14) (12)

CL 09 Real Estate License Background Chk 2.0 3 52 55

CL 10 Eliminate Fire Protection Board

CL 11 Criminal Records Fund Shift

CL 12 Forensic Sciences Improvement 288 288

CL 13 Criminal Records Funding 2,000 (2,000)

CL 14 Post-conviction DNA Analysis 312 312

CL 15 Restore Crime Lab Equipment Funding (110) (110) (220)

CL 16 Criminal Background Checks 0.3 18 18

CL 23 Additional Local/Federal Authority 605 605

CL 29 Biennialize Health Insurance Rate 343 138 481 Total Carry Forward Level 404.3 50,658 57,156 107,814

Percent Change from Current Biennium .6% 9.7% (5.3)% 1.2%

Carry Forward plus Workload Changes 404.3 50,658 57,156 107,814 Percent Change from Current Biennium .6% 9.7% (5.3)% 1.2%

Total Maintenance Level 404.3 50,658 57,156 107,814 Percent Change from Current Biennium .6% 9.7% (5.3)% 1.2%

PL AA Fingerprint Record Conversion 805 805

PL AB Criminal History Record Retention 200 200

PL AC DNA Kits 935 128 1,063

PL AK Fire Training Academy Funding 345 345

Subtotal - Performance Level Changes 0.0 935 1,478 2,413 2011-13 Total Proposed Budget 404.3 51,593 58,634 110,227 Percent Change from Current Biennium .6% 11.7% (2.8)% 3.5%



3:50:44PM


FTEs Fund State Other Funds Total Funds Program: 030 Technical Services Bureau 2009-11 Current Biennium Total 547.6 22,848 114,114 136,962

CL 06 Consumer Loan Companies (1) (1) CL 08 Cigarette Reduced Ignition Program (2) (2)

CL 09 Real Estate License Background Chk (3) (3)

CL 16 Criminal Background Checks

CL 23 Additional Local/Federal Authority (605) (605)

CL 28 Fuel Rate Adjustment 1,323 1,323

CL 29 Biennialize Health Insurance Rate 167 533 700 Total Carry Forward Level 547.6 23,009 115,365 138,374 .7% 1.1% 1.0% Percent Change from Current Biennium

Carry Forward plus Workload Changes 547.6 23,009 115,365 138,374 .7% 1.1% 1.0% Percent Change from Current Biennium

M2 8F Fuel Rate Adjustment 20 184 204

M2 9X Self Insurance Premium 288 957 1,245

M2 AF Return CAD Debt Service Funding 1 (573) (572)

Total Maintenance Level 547.6 23,318 115,933 139,251 2.1% 1.6% 1.7% Percent Change from Current Biennium

PL AG Mobile Office Platform 7.0 947 6,974 7,921

PL AH Pursuit Vehicle Replacement 4.3 5,238 5,238

PL AI Field Force Staffing 4.4 19 3,095 3,114

Subtotal - Performance Level Changes 15.7 966 15,307 16,273 2011-13 Total Proposed Budget 563.3 24,284 131,240 155,524 Percent Change from Current Biennium 2.9% 6.3% 15.0% 13.6%



3:50:44PM


FTEs Fund State Other Funds Total Funds Program: 900 Capital Projects Program 2009-11 Current Biennium Total 3,126 3,126

CL 20 Transportation - Minor Works (1,626) (1,626) CL 21 Shelton Regional Water Plan (1,500) (1,500) Total Carry Forward Level Percent Change from Current Biennium (100.0)% (100.0)% Carry Forward plus Workload Changes (100.0)% (100.0)% Percent Change from Current Biennium

Total Maintenance Level (100.0)% (100.0)% Percent Change from Current Biennium

PL AJ Minor Works 670 670

PL AR Regional Water & Sewer System 3,100 3,100

3,770 3,770

Subtotal - Performance Level Changes 0.0 2011-13 Total Proposed Budget 3,770 3,770 Percent Change from Current Biennium 20.6% 20.6%



State of Washington Agency Budget Request Decision Package Summary Agency: 225 Washington State Patrol Budget Period: 2011-13 Decision Packages Code Decision Package Title M2-9X Self Insurance Premiums M2-8F Fuel Rate Adjustment M2-AF Return CAD Debt Service Funding Code Decision Package Title PL-AH Pursuit Vehicle Replacement PL-AI Field Force Staffing PL-AG Mobile Office Platform PL-AC DNA Kits PL-AA Fingerprint Record Conversion PL-AK Fire Training Academy Funding PL-AB Criminal History Record Retention PL-AD Out of Service Order Penalties PL-AE Notary Service Fee Increase



TAB C. Decision Packages

Maintenance Level Packages Self Insurance Premiums ....................................................................................... C-1 Fuel Rate Adjustment ............................................................................................. C-7 Return CAD Debt Service Funding ...................................................................... C-11

Policy Level Packages Pursuit Vehicle Replacement ............................................................................... C-15 Field Force Staffing .............................................................................................. C-19 Mobile Office Platform .......................................................................................... C-25 DNA Kits ............................................................................................................... C-39 Fingerprint Record Conversion ............................................................................ C-45 Fire Training Academy Funding ........................................................................... C-49 Criminal History Record Retention ....................................................................... C-53 Out of Service Order Penalties ............................................................................. C-57 Notary Service Fee Increase ................................................................................ C-61

Decision Packages Page 1 Agency 225 - Washington State Patrol


Decision Package Code/Title: M2-9X Self Insurance Premiums Budget Period: 2011-13 Biennium Budget Level: Maintenance RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol’s risk management premiums paid to the state’s Risk Management Pool will increase from $8,341,815 in the 2009-11 Biennium to $9,586,548 in the 2011-13 Biennium. We request $1,244,733 to cover the increase in our self-insurance premium for the 2011-13 Biennium. This proposal impacts all activities. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION Washington State’s Self-Insurance Liability Program for tort liabilities began in 1990. Administered by the Office of Financial Management’s Risk Management Division, the program was established to pay claims against all state agencies from incidents on or after July 1, 1990. Claims and defense costs are paid from the Liability Account, which is actuarially based and funded by premiums from state agencies. These obligations are based on past losses, current reserves to pay outstanding claims, and predicted trends. Each agency’s share of the premium is calculated by taking into consideration individual agency loss trends. The State Patrol’s premiums will increase from $8,341,815 in the 2009-11 Biennium to $9,586,548 in the 2011-13 Biennium. The chart below displays the growth in premiums from the prior to current and ensuing biennia.

2007-2009 Biennium

2009-11 Biennium

2011-13 Biennium

Incremental Increase from 2009-11 to 2011-13

$7,667,800 $8,341,815 $9,586,548 $1,244,733

FISCAL DETAIL

FY 2012 FY 2013 Total

1. Operating Expenditures

General Fund – State $143,829 $143,829 $287,658

State Patrol Highway Account

Program 030 $478,538 $478,537 $957,075

Total $622,367 $622,366 $1,244,733

3. Objects of Expenditure

E – Goods and Services $622,366 $622,367 $1,244,733

Total Objects $622,366 $622,367 $1,244,733



Key Risk Analysis The State Patrol incurs a relatively high level of risk in accomplishing its core public safety mission. About 50 percent of our work force does not work in a typical office setting. Instead, the 1,100 commissioned men and women of the State Patrol wear firearms and most go to work at the wheel of a specialized vehicle. Given the nature of their jobs and the equipment they use, substantial risk is inherent in every work shift. This phenomenon is evident when comparing statewide pending liability claims at June 30, 2010 to the State Patrol’s experience: While 18 percent of the statewide pending cases fall under automobile liability, 63 percent of the State Patrol’s pending cases fall in this category. In addition to vehicles, officers performing traffic law enforcement use a wide variety of equipment in the conduct of their jobs—mobile radios, body armor, firearms and other methods of control such as chemical sprays, impact weapons, and handcuffs. The State Patrol staff also faces the daily challenge of interpretation and application of many state and federal laws, regulations, and judicial actions. In summary, the key risk factors for the Washington State Patrol stem from its use of pursuit vehicles and our law enforcement responsibilities. Past Agency Loss Trends While the frequency of loss varies from biennium to biennium, the types of loss remain reasonably consistent. An analysis of the State Patrol’s five-year tort claims history confirms that the State Patrol experiences a much higher percentage of automobile liability than the state as a whole.

Number of Claims Total Cost Percentage

State Patrol

Auto Liability 201 $ 4,814,960 63.31%

General Liability 250 $ 2,790,343 36.69%

Statewide

Auto Liability 1,531 $ 10,672,203 17.73%

General Liability 16,878 $ 49,527,590 82.27%

Future Agency Loss Analysis While we do not have reason to believe that loss trends will change significantly in the future, given the nature of Washington State Patrol’s core mission, we remain committed to identifying and initiating those processes that could further reduce the frequency and severity of both automobile and general liability cases. Because of the enactment of the Loshbaugh Act in 2005, the State Patrol is particularly focused on developing, maintaining and improving the decision-making skills of those involved in driving police pursuit vehicles millions of miles each year.



Agency Risk Mitigation Strategies The Loshbaugh Act As the result of a collision fatality involving a trooper, the 2005 Legislature enacted legislation mandating an experienced, third-party review of the State Patrol’s policies and procedures for officer-involved collisions. The 2005 assessment of the State Patrol’s vehicle collision policies led to several revised policies and procedures including:

• The development of criteria to be used for categorizing collisions involving WSP personnel into “minor,” “severe,” or “major”.

• Setting a specific agency response based on the seriousness of the collision.

• Establishment of documentation requirements and improvement of the investigative protocol for officer collision cases.

• Establishment of an administrative review process for reviewing collision cases for possible discipline and recommendations for additional training.

• The development of a biennial driving certification program for all commissioned agency personnel.

• Clarification of the employee’s responsibility when involved in a traffic collision. Basic Trooper and Specialized Training Every member of the State Patrol who drives an emergency vehicle has received at least 80 hours of classroom and actual driving experience during their initial 28 week training period. Included in the Emergency Vehicle Operation Course Training is a low speed skill course, high speed pursuit course and qualification process that must be completed error free. Following the Academy training, each cadet rides with a Field Training Officer for another eight weeks to obtain additional experience. This training is now reinforced at annual in-service training and driver training includes a recertification process every other year. Additional focused, intensive driver training is provided to those officers whose driving experience warrants it. Specialized training is required and provided for those officers filling specialty positions, such as breath test technicians, motorcycle or pilot positions, field training officers, collision specialists, Special Weapons and Tactics, and others. Non-commissioned staff filling roles as communications officers, evidence custodians, and commercial vehicle enforcement positions also receive specialized training. A driving simulator has been purchased and is now a regularly used training aid. Situational judgment decisions and unexpected occurrence/reactions scenarios are now able to be tested and reviewed for additional needed training. Supervisory and management training is provided for civil service and commissioned staff. All those appointed to supervisory and management positions, both commissioned and civil service receive 120 hours of leadership training, including presentations on professional standards, personnel administration, accounting and business practices, risk management, budget development and ethics.



Safe and Reliable Equipment The State Patrol has a department regulation requiring all armed officers to wear armored vests when they perform traffic, commercial vehicle enforcement or port of entry duties, and in any other situation where they may be exposed to danger. In addition, less-lethal weapons have been purchased and distributed throughout the agency to divisions and districts.

Executive Review and Oversight The Washington State Patrol will continue to aggressively manage the most evident risks associated with its public safety mission. Our Executive Staff continues to review our tort liability on a quarterly basis. As part of our successful accountability-driven Strategic Advancement Forum process, we track progress in reducing the number of WSP involved collisions. Executive Staff also review reports from OFM’s Division of Risk Management and the Attorney General’s Office on a quarterly basis to identify areas of risk and implement strategies to mitigate them. Dr. Don Sorenson is the subject expert for risk management issues and he can be reached at (360) 596-4140. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? WSP is making concerted efforts to control its risk exposure while ensuring the safety of its employees. However, we must accept a level of risk in order to accomplish the public safety services identified in its strategic plan. Adequate funding to cover the premium increase in the 2011-13 Biennium will ensure that WSP can achieve its core mission. Performance Measure Detail. Agency performance measures are not affected by this request. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies identified in the strategic plan, including the following:

- Conduct agency risk assessments and prepare annual risk analysis report for Executive Staff.

- Conduct risk-based internal audits.

This decision package is directly related to the following WSP goal and priority: Goal #5: Provide critical leadership, tools, and resources to foster an ethical,

innovative, knowledgeable, and diverse workforce. Priority #5.4: Renew and evaluate internal processes and work products to manage risk

and ensure legal compliance, accuracy, timeliness, and efficiency.



Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request is indirectly related to the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Risk management is a key component because the State Patrol must be prepared to conduct its business in the most effective and efficient manner. To help meet these goals, we ensure that all employees are properly trained and have the necessary equipment to perform the job duties to the fullest extent. These efforts, combined with an annual risk assessment, are designed to reduce the overall risk to the agency. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This request is indirectly related to the following statewide results:

- Improve the safety of people and property. - Improve the ability of state government to achieve results efficiently and

effectively. The Washington State Patrol works to control risk exposure while ensuring the safety of our employees. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? Most of the claims that are settled by or involve a judgment against the State Patrol stem from its mandated law enforcement activities. We make every effort to ensure that our employees are a well-trained, professional resource for Washington State citizens and their families. Clearly, aggressive risk management must be practiced by all state agencies, since the losses experienced by each agency contribute to increased statewide premiums all agencies face. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? Since our risk management premiums must be paid annually, the State Patrol considered pro-rating the premium increase to agency divisions based on level of risk. However, the size of this increase would have a very negative impact on our traffic law enforcement program, which constitutes nearly half our budget. The most reasonable choice is to continue to aggressively manage our risk and seek additional funding to offset the premium increase. What are the consequences of not funding this package? Failure to receive adequate funding for risk management premiums will necessitate an agency-wide reduction of current level service delivery. This will seriously impact the Washington State Patrol’s ability to provide basic public safety services.



What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. The amount of the premium increase was calculated by the Risk Management Division of the Office of Financial Management. No revenue is assumed with this request. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? These costs are ongoing. The careful management of our risks is the best strategy for containing the size of any additional increases. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: Expenditures by fund are split based upon the legislative approved 2010 JLARC cost allocation model. Operating Budget 23.11% Transportation Budget 76.89%

SUBOBJECT DETAIL

CALCULATIONS FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTAL

1. Expenditures by SubobjectInsurance EP 622,366 622,367 1,244,733 Total $622,366 $622,367 $1,244,733

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: 957,075 957,075 957,075

Operating - General Fund 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: 287,658 287,658 287,658

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $1,244,733 $1,244,733 $1,244,733

Self Insurance Premium

11-13 Biennium

C Schmitz - 7/7/10 Page 1 of 5 11-13 Self Insurance Premium.xlsx

Agency Code

Agency09-11 SIP +

Defense11-13 SIP +

DefenseVariance 09-11

vs 11-13

011 House of Representatives $2,000 $2,086 $86 012 Senate $2,000 $2,000 $0

013Joint Transportation Committee $2,000 $2,000 $0

014Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee $2,000 $2,000 $0

020Legislative Evaluation and Accountability Program $2,000 $2,000 $0

035 Office of the State Actuary $2,000 $2,000 $0

038Joint Legilsative Systems Committee $2,000 $44,195 $42,195

040 Statute Law Committee $2,000 $2,000 $0 045 Supreme Court $60,597 $9,600 ($50,997)046 Law Library $2,000 $2,000 $0 048 Court of Appeals $2,000 $2,000 $0

050Commission on Judicial conduct $2,000 $2,000 $0

055Administrative Office of the Courts $66,090 $21,044 ($45,046)

056 Office of Public Defense $2,000 $2,000 $0

057Office of Civil Legal Aid (Est FY 07) $2,000 $2,000 $0

075 Office of the Governor $13,724 $2,000 ($11,724)

080Office of the Lieutenant Governor $2,000 $2,000 $0

082Public Disclosure Commission $2,405 $2,000 ($405)

085Office of the Secretary of State $2,932 $4,018 $1,086

086Governor's Office of Indian Affairs $2,000 $2,000 $0

087Commission on Asian Pacific American Affairs $2,000 $2,000 $0

090 Office of State Treasurer $2,000 $2,000 $0 095 Office of State Auditor $269,874 $30,087 ($239,787)

099Salaries for Elected Officials $2,000 $2,000 $0

100 Office of Attorney General $378,461 $574,511 $196,050

101 Caseload Forecast Council $2,000 $2,000 $0

102Department of Financial Institutions $311,537 $2,000 ($309,537)

103

Department of Community, Trade and Economic Dev $54,142 $20,305 ($33,837)

104Office of the Forecast Council $2,000 $2,000 $0

105Office of Financial Management $15,962 $27,673 $11,711

107Washington State Health Care Authority $129,373 $100,700 ($28,673)

110Office of Administrative Hearings $2,405 $2,209 ($196)

111 Department of Personnel $24,617 $59,129 $34,512 116 State Lottery $45,842 $53,405 $7,563


11-13 Biennium


Agency Code

Agency09-11 SIP +

Defense11-13 SIP +


vs 11-13

117Washington State Gambling Commission $7,965 $38,114 $30,149

118Commission on Hispanic Affairs $2,000 $2,000 $0

119Commission on African-American Affairs $2,000 $2,000 $0

120 Human Rights Commission $76,111 $2,000 ($74,111)

124Department of Retirement Systems $21,462 $2,000 ($19,462)

126 State Investment board $2,000 $2,000 $0 130 Department of Printing $2,000 $2,000 $0 140 Department of Revenue $11,383 $32,117 $20,734 142 Board of Tax Appeals $2,000 $2,000 $0

147

Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprise $2,000 $2,000 $0

150Department of General Administration $239,110 $154,455 ($84,655)

155Department of Information Services $30,996 $2,000 ($28,996)

160Office of Insurance Commissioner $114,015 $115,411 $1,396

165 Board of Accountancy $2,000 $17,904 $15,904

167Forensic Investigation Council $0 $2,000 $2,000

185 Horse Racing Commission $215,624 $168,774 ($46,850)

190Board of Industrial Ins. Appeals $2,000 $5,765 $3,765

195 Liquor Control Board $535,322 $489,000 ($46,322)

205Board of Pilotage Commissioners $2,000 $2,000 $0

215

Utilities and Transportation Commission $69,008 $2,000 ($67,008)

220Board for Volunteer Firefighters $2,000 $2,000 $0

225 Washington State Patrol $8,341,815 $9,586,548 $1,244,733

227Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commis. $25,398 $33,781 $8,383

228Washington Traffic Safety Commission $2,000 $2,000 $0

235Department of Labor and Industries $1,167,035 $1,186,983 $19,948

240 Department of Licensing $537,079 $1,167,821 $630,742 245 Military Department $389,606 $371,565 ($18,041)

250Indeterminate Sentence Review Board $19,351 $6,004 ($13,347)

275Public Employment Relations Commission $2,000 $14,500 $12,500

300Department of Social and Health Services $51,272,637 $56,309,115 $5,036,478

302Home Care Quality Authority $2,000 $4,804 $2,804

303 Department of Health $1,406,703 $1,293,251 ($113,452)

305Department of Veterans Affairs $398,193 $255,974 ($142,219)


11-13 Biennium


Agency Code

Agency09-11 SIP +

Defense11-13 SIP +


vs 11-13

310 Department of Corrections $25,680,622 $19,433,726 ($6,246,896)

315Department of Services for the Blind $11,374 $2,000 ($9,374)

325Sentencing Guidelines Commission $241,199 $79,538 ($161,661)

343Higher Education Coordinating Board $28,791 $36,509 $7,718

350Superintendent of Public Instruction $163,541 $99,286 ($64,255)

351 State School for the Blind $7,214 $2,000 ($5,214)

352Community and Technical College System $2,000 $2,000 $0

353 State School for the Deaf $103,403 $2,000 ($101,403)

354

Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board $2,000 $2,000 $0

355Dept of Archeology & Historic Preservation $28,808 $2,000 ($26,808)

357Dept of Early Learning (Est FY 07) $3,784,434 $9,775,743 $5,991,309

365Washington State University $1,451,728 $1,236,380 ($215,348)

370Eastern Washington University $2,890,480 $1,175,550 ($1,714,930)

375Central Washington University $490,621 $258,093 ($232,528)

376 Evergreen State College $169,575 $119,672 ($49,903)

377

Spokane Intercollegiate Research & Technical Institution $342,022 $124,251 ($217,771)

380Western Washington University $420,353 $457,657 $37,304

387Washington State Arts Commission $2,000 $2,000 $0

390Washington State Historical Society $26,015 $14,304 ($11,711)

395Eastern Washington State Historical Society $2,000 $2,000 $0

405Department of Transportation $35,306,046 $33,220,350 ($2,085,696)

406County Road Administration Board $2,000 $2,000 $0

407Transportation Improvement Board $2,000 $2,000 $0

408Marine Employees' Commission $2,000 $2,000 $0

410Transportation Commission $2,000 $13,451 $11,451

460Columbia River Gorge Commission $7,734 $2,000 ($5,734)

461 Department of Ecology $1,176,861 $518,138 ($658,723)

462Washington Pollution Liability Insurance Agency $2,000 $2,000 $0

465State Parks and Recreation Commission $1,432,794 $1,527,062 $94,268


11-13 Biennium


Agency Code

Agency09-11 SIP +

Defense11-13 SIP +


vs 11-13

467Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation $2,000 $2,000 $0

468Environmental Hearings Office $2,000 $2,000 $0

471State Conservation Commission $2,000 $2,000 $0

476Growth Management Hearings Board $2,000 $2,000 $0

477Department of Fish and Wildlife $965,407 $1,271,076 $305,669

490Department of Natural Resources $2,900,357 $1,536,060 ($1,364,297)

495 Department of Agriculture $741,666 $497,284 ($244,382)500 Apple Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

501 Alfalfa Seed Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 502 Beef Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 503 Blueberry Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 505 Bulb Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 506 Asparagus Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

508Canola & Rapeseed Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

510Dairy Products Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

512Dry Peas & Lentil Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

515 Fruit Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 520 Fryer Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 522 Hop Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

524Puget Sound Gillnet Salmon Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

525 Potato Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 528 Mint Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

529Red Raspberry Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

530 Seed Potato Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

532Turf Grass Seed Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

533 Tree Fruit Research $1,000 $1,000 $0 534 Wine Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0 535 Grain Commission $1,000 $1,000 $0

540Employment Security Department $791,627 $623,225 ($168,402)

545 Beer Commission $0 $1,000 $1,000

550State Convention and Trade center $141,916 $39,409 ($102,507)

605Everett Community College $38,249 $51,160 $12,911

610Edmonds Community College $326,251 $314,180 ($12,071)

621Whatcom Community College, District 21 $36,640 $24,898 ($11,742)

627Bellevue Community College $143,890 $200,112 $56,222

629Big Bend Community College $61,357 $13,217 ($48,140)

632 Centralia College $33,253 $22,385 ($10,868)


11-13 Biennium


Agency Code

Agency09-11 SIP +

Defense11-13 SIP +


vs 11-13634 Cascadia College $73,386 $39,608 ($33,778)635 Clark College $28,469 $172,151 $143,682 637 Pierce College $74,690 $45,484 ($29,206)

639Columbia Basin Community College $1,318,156 $1,058,231 ($259,925)

648 Grays Harbor College $2,000 $14,093 $12,093

649Green River Community College $100,921 $43,975 ($56,946)

652Highline Community College $125,987 $40,588 ($85,399)

657 Lower Columbia College $88,057 $394,700 $306,643 662 Olympic College $94,372 $28,359 ($66,013)665 Peninsula College $152,261 $131,920 ($20,341)

670Seattle Community Colleges-District VI $383,964 $326,481 ($57,483)

672Shoreline Community College $13,465 $30,585 $17,120

674 Skagit Valley college $203,071 $105,271 ($97,800)

675South Puget Sound Community College $19,331 $12,090 ($7,241)

676 Spokane - District 17 $299,526 $295,125 ($4,401)

678Tacoma Community College $365,935 $230,865 ($135,070)

683Walla Walla Community College $103,351 $44,260 ($59,091)

686 Wenatchee Valley College $136,524 $98,555 ($37,969)

691Yakima Valley Community college $192,261 $49,960 ($142,301)

692Lake Washington Technical College $97,756 $103,924 $6,168

693 Renton Technical College $4,072 $7,505 $3,433

694Bellingham Technical College $2,000 $12,106 $10,106

695 Bates Technical College $972,729 $907,465 ($65,264)

696Clover Park Technical College $35,576 $2,000 ($33,576)

TOTAL $151,201,862 $149,204,865 ($1,996,997)

Section 1: Report Results of 2009 ERM Plan

Instructions: Please list the 2009 Action Plan items you detailed in Section 3 of last year‟s Update and briefly describe what happened with each item. If 2009 items are not yet complete, please indicate the % of completion and tell us when you will finish. If you completed additional ERM activities, feel free to list those and/or to attach important documents. Please email all four sections of the completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.

2009 ERM Action Plan Items Check if

complete

Results Notes

Expand driver training via simulator

Conduct agency risk assessments and risk-based

audits. Completion of annual risk assessment and

conduct CALEA mandated audits

Continue to track worker-safety issues and make

recommendations through Safety team and Safety &

Wellness Coordinator

Complete final review and train personnel in

Continuity of Operations plan

Continue to track and examine torts/claims for root

causes and/or patterns. Share info at SAF

Continue to produce after-action reports – Emergency

Management

Provide training to agency regarding public

disclosure. Monitor suit trends.

Expand risk assessment / analysis strategy to include

all supervisors in process.

Mandated per Policy/REGS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

All commissioned personnel now receiving training via

simulator.

Completed. Respective reports published in 2009.

Completed. Safety committees are active.

Continuing to complete/update plan. Table-top exercises

conducted.

Ongoing. Reports to Exec. Staff and during SAF (2 x’s

each).

Ongoing. All events produce after-action reports.

PowerPoint (w/ sound) training for all personnel

completed. Training was mandated and tracked.

Additional training provided to managers at LPO and

Managers Basic/Supervisor basic trainings.

Completed. To occur as standard practice.

Mandated by Policy/Regulations. Compliance attained.

2010 Enterprise Risk Management and Safety Update Agency: WSP

mailto:[email protected]

Section 2A: Track Agency Progress Toward Mature Enterprise Risk Management Practices

Instructions: The measures listed below are milestones of advancement for more mature agencies. It can take several years for an agency to successfully implement all measures and agencies are not expected to have all of them completed at this time. Please indicate which measures have now been completed and the year you plan to address each remaining measure. Feel free to add notes and attach documents. Please email all four sections of your completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.

Measures of a Mature Program Check if

Complete

Planned

for 2010

Planned

for 2011

Notes

Achieved Enterprise Risk Management

Maturity Model Level 4 or above a All agencies have achieved Level 4 or above.

Risk Management responsibility assigned

to specific employee a All agencies have assigned risk management responsibility

to a specific employee.

Risk Management on executive leadership

team agenda at least quarterly a a a Participate weekly at Exec. meetings. Quarterly reporting of

torts/suits.

Agency Enterprise Risk Management

policy in place or in progress a a a Reviewed annually via Regulation Update/Concurrence

process.

Agency incidents reported centrally and

reviewed periodically a a a Incidents are reported immediately to WSP Risk

Management Division (RMD). RMD will review quarterly.

Risks that can prevent achieving program

goals are discussed and ranked by

severity and frequency (Risk Mapping)

a a a Occurs annually. Due June 1 per Regulations

Mitigation plans are developed when

needed for high ranking risks a a a Occurs following each incident and annually per

Regulations.

Where risks are under control, ‘best

practices’ that provide control are

gathered and shared throughout agency

a a a Continue to review, update and perfect.

Risk analysis integrated into agency

strategic and budget planning a a a Accomplished through Strategic Planning and Performance

Section and Budget and Fiscal Services. Exec Staff

incorporated ERM into agency priority under Agency Goal

#5



Section 2B: Track Agency Progress Toward Agency-Wide List of Priority Risks (Risk Register)

Instructions: Because of the overall progress of state agencies‟ efforts to implement ERM, Washington will soon have a statewide risk register – a list of the major risks facing the state and the steps that agencies are taking to deal with the risks. In order to create such a register, each agency must create its own list of priority risks, and a description of how to reduce (mitigate) the risks. A risk register typically includes the elements listed below. (We have attached a sample register to this document.) If your agency has already completed a Register, please attach a copy to this Update. Please email all four sections of your completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.

My Agency Risk Register Clearly States: Check if

Complete

Notes

WSP 2010 Risk Register separately attached.

2010 Enterprise Risk Management and Safety Update Agency:


Section 3: 2010 Agency ERM Plans

Instructions: The list below is compiled from previous agency ERM plans. Agencies are not expected to be working on all of these areas at the same time; please check the „Not Area of Focus‟ column if this is not a 2010 action item for your agency. Feel free to add other Action Plan items important to your agency. If you check „Planned for 2010‟, please briefly describe what you will be doing, how it will reduce agency losses and estimate how much losses will be reduced. Please email all four sections of your completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.

Possible 2010

Action Items

2010 Action

Item

Describe What You Plan To Do Explain How You Will Measure

Success of Expected Results

Estimate How Much This

Will Reduce Losses (%)

Ex. An agency decides to focus on tort claim losses in 2010. The losses were $500,000 and were mostly due to traffic collisions. The plan is to give employees driversafety classes, and the estimated benefit is a 5% reduction in claim losses by year end. Success would be measured by meeting the anticipated reduction in 2010.

Ex. An agency has a 12% increase in the number of public record requests it received in 2009, and paid $250,000 in court-ordered fines due to disclosure delays.The plan is to create a centralized system operated by a public records officer, and the estimated benefit is to have no future fines – a 100% reduction. Success would be measured by having no fines in 2010.

Worker Safety Continue to track worker-safety

issues and make recommendations

through Safety team and Safety &

Wellness Coordinator

Through comprehensive surveys,

feedback from safety teams, and

injuries

5% injury reduction (per

HRD strategic plan)

Tort Claims and

Lawsuits

Continue to track and examine for

root causes and/or patterns. Share

info at SAF and coordinated,

detailed bi-annual briefing to

Executive Staff

Reduction in both settlements/awards

and legal expenditures.

See OFM trend data

Emergency

Management

Continue to produce after-action

reports for all events where ICS

implemented

100% compliance. Learnings

incorporated into policy/procedure

and/or training

Unknown

Public Records Provide training to agency

personnel related to public

disclosure. Monitor suit trends.

All employees trained. Reduced suits

filed/judgments against departrment.

Unknown

Risk Assessment/Risk

Register

Annual Risk Analysis report

combines qualitative and

quantitative data from field, AGO

and OFM. Development of Risk

Register

Division/District risks identified with

mitigation plans. Annual report reflects

ERM expansiveness/inclusiveness.

Establishing Baseline



Section 4A: Update Safety Assessment Scores

Instructions: Once you have completed your new Safety and Health Program Assessment (using L&I Form 33), please enter your 2009 and 2010 scores by section, along with the percentage of change for each section. Please feel free to add notes or attach any needed documents. Please email all four sections of your completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.

Measures 2009 Safety

Assessment

Score

2010 Safety

Assessment

Score

%

Change

Notes

Management Leadership and Employee

Participation Section

29 28 3%

Workplace Analysis Section 18 17 - 6%

Hazard Prevention and Control Section 14 18 29%

Safety and Health Training Section 6 8 34%

Total 67 71 6%

Number of staff surveyed to complete

assessment

293 217 N/A An email invitation was sent out to a random third of the

agency for both 2009 and 2010. All employees could also

access the survey via the Safety intranet page as well.



Section 4B: Update Safety Action Plan Items

Instructions: Please provide a brief description of each item you listed in your 2009 Safety Action Plan and the outcome, if complete. If not yet complete, please indicate the % of completion and tell us when you will finish. List new Safety Action Plan items in the 2010 section. Feel free to attach important documents. Please email all four sections of your completed Update to [email protected] by noon on April 30, 2010.


2009 Safety Action Plan Items Check if

complete

Results Notes

Safety and Wellness Manual Update

All teams are to send me their review by March 31

An updated manual will be posted by June 1

Training and Education

Received approval to begin developing online training

2nd Annual Safety Teams Training Day

Centralize respirator program & hearing protection

Currently both are decentralized and fall under the supervisor’s

responsibility

Complete New Injury Report Form

Provide example

Better instructions

Last year, WSP successfully updated the Safety &

Wellness manual with input from the Safety Teams.

WSP also started developing S&H training for all

employees. WSP will continue to educate, train, and

motivate employees in workplace safety. As a result,

more employees will become familiar with our S&H

policies and more importantly, become involved.

Focus safety teams

and develop

preventative training

strategies to address

our most prevalent

injuries and continue to

reduce the number of

injuries we can control

through prevention and

training.

2010 Safety Action Plan Items Check if

new for

2010

Expected Outcome Notes

Quarterly Reports to Captains/Division CommandersDesired Outcome: Provide management with quarterly updates on safety related matters and ensure they are kept in the communication loop Include a report for Executive Staff

Information from Project Logs, injury stats, and safety team

minutes to be included

Training and EducationDesired Outcome: Provide “how-to” and informational trainings on safety & wellness Continue to add online training

2nd Annual Safety Teams Training Day (July 20)

PreparednessDesired Outcome: Inform/Educate employees on who, what, why, how Ensure COOP plan is updated regularly & exercised

Develop educational materials and provide links to online

resources

Continue Prepare in a Year

Through this process, WSP discovered a gap in

our training processes. Commissioned staff

receive training on First Aid/CPR, preparedness,

emergency response, etc.; however, our civil-

service staff are offered these trainings on a

limited basis. Some non-commissioned

employees don’t realize that the training is even

offered to them from our agency.

District/Division Commanders are ultimately

responsible for safety & health within their

respective district/division and to hold them

more accountable, a quarterly report will be sent

out reporting on the injury stats and projects

going on within their area. To complete the

communication circle, a report will also go to

Executive Staff.

We will continue to

utilize the safety

teams in developing

training and

prevention strategies

to reduce the

number of injuries

we incur.




Decision Package Code/Title: 8F Fuel Rate Adjustment Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Maintenance RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol operates a fleet of 1,546 vehicles that consume an average of 163,500 gallons of fuel each month. The vehicles are used for traffic law enforcement and emergency response activities, along with specialized functions and general transportation. An increase to our vehicle fuel budget is necessary to support current levels of travel miles and enforcement activity. While this request primarily impacts the Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations activity, it also impacts virtually every other agency activity. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION State Patrol vehicles consume an average of 163,500 gallons of fuel each month. About 77 percent of this fuel is used by vehicles driven by commissioned officers who provide direct traffic law enforcement and emergency response services across Washington State. Given the number of vehicles in the fleet, the safe operation and maintenance of these vehicles is a critical, major expense. The majority of our fuel is purchased from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) at sites throughout the state. The WSDOT buys fuel in bulk through competitive state contracts. A small administrative fee is added to this cost when the State Patrol purchases the fuel, but the cost is still below retail price. About 11 percent of the fuel used is purchased from private vendors in those areas of the state not served by WSDOT, for which we pay the full retail price.

FISCAL DETAIL



General Fund – State ($11,600) $31,800 $20,200


Program 030 (102,000) 286,300 184,300

Total ($113,600) $318,100 $204,500

2. Staffing (FTEs) -


E – Goods and Services ($113,600) 318,100 $204,500

Total Objects ($113,600) $318,100 $204,500



The graph below reflects the Transportation Revenue Forecast Council’s June 2010 forecast of nominal fuel prices.

The retail price of fuel has continued to rise and is projected to reach $3.07 in FY 2012 and $3.29 in FY 2013, based upon the June 2010 forecast. The cost for fuel purchased from WSDOT sites (including the administrative fee) is estimated to be $2.96 in FY 2012 and $3.18 in FY 2013. These prices are used to calculate the cost of 89 percent of the fuel (145,500 gallons per month). The remaining 11 percent is purchased from gas stations throughout the state. Mr. Paul Stray is the subject matter expert for Fleet issues and he can be reached at (360) 596-6042. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? By increasing the funding for fuel, we will be able to continue driving our vehicles to accomplish our core mission. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies in our strategic plan and is directly related to the following Washington State Patrol goal and priority: Goal #5: Provide critical leadership, tools, and resources to foster an ethical,

innovative, knowledgeable, and diverse workforce.



Priority #5.3: Improve the condition and sustainability of agency facilities, vehicles, and equipment.

Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide results:


effectively. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? Based upon current projections, we will need to receive this requested funding to maintain the current number of miles driven by staff. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? Our agency continues to work diligently to adopt strategies for efficiently managing the vehicle fleet. In the past, the only option for absorbing volatile fuel increases was to defer vehicle replacements, using those dollars to buy necessary fuel. However, vehicle replacement funding is now provisoed and cannot be used for fuel expenditures. What are the consequences of not funding this package? Failure to obtain adequate funding to cover our vehicle fuel needs will require some level of service reduction. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. Per the June 2010 Transportation Revenue Forecast, the retail price of fuel will average $3.07 during FY 2012 and $3.29 during FY 2013. According to WSDOT, the State Patrol’s cost for fuel purchased from them will average $2.96 in FY 2012 and $3.18 in FY 2013. These prices may fluctuate in subsequent revenue forecasts.



Projected WSP Average Cost

per Gallon (WSDOT)

Projected Average Cost

per Gallon (Retail)

Current Funded Price per Gallon

Incremental Increase/

decrease for WSDOT Gallons

(145,500 gallons/month)

Incremental Increase for

Retail Gallons (18,000

gallons/month)

FY 2012 $2.96 $3.07 $3.03 $ (122,200) $8,600

FY 2013 $3.18 $3.29 $3.03 $261,900 $56,200

Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? These costs are ongoing. There will be increased or decreased costs in future years depending on the fuel forecast given at that time. Supplemental budget requests will be submitted each year to address these changes. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: The amount for fuel displayed below is estimated based upon the June 2010 Transportation Revenue Forecast. This decision package asks for the increase for fuel for the 2011-13 Biennium.

SUBOBJECT DETAIL


1. Expenditures by SubobjectVehicle Fuel ES1000 ($113,600) $318,100 $204,500 Total ($113,600) $318,100 $204,500

2. Employment: FTEs by Year:Commissioned Employees - - - Civil Service Employees - - - Total FTEs - - -

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures:

Program 030 $184,300 $184,300 $184,300


Expenditures: 20,200 20,200 20,200

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $204,500 $204,500 $204,500



Decision Package Code/Title: M2-AF Return Funding for CAD Debt Service Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Maintenance Level RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol has an ongoing appropriation in the amount of $572,000 from the Enhanced 911 (E-911) Account to make debt service payments on a Certificate of Participation for our Computer Aided Dispatch System. Those payments are ending in the 2009-11 Biennium and the Washington State Patrol no longer needs this appropriation. This request returns the funding. In the 2009-11 Biennium, we erroneously received funding for compensation adjustments for the Communications Division from the E-911 Account. This decision package asks for a fund switch between the E-911 Account, GF-State and the State Patrol Highway Account. This proposal impacts all activities. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION The Washington State Patrol received funding in the 2003 Legislative Session from the E-911 Account to make debt service payments on financing that was used to replace Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) equipment. The ongoing funding provided for debt service was $572,000 per biennium.

FISCAL DETAIL



Enhanced 911 – State ($302,000) ($301,000) ($603,000)

General Fund - State 0 500 500

State Patrol Highway Account - Program

030

1,000 29,500 30,500

Total ($301,000) ($271,000) ($572,000)


B – Employee Benefits 1,000 30,000 31,000

P – Debt Service (302,000) (301,000) (603,000)

Total Objects ($301,000) ($271,000) ($572,000)



In the 2009-11 Biennium, funding from the E-911 Account was erroneously provided for the following for the Communications Division:

Total

Health Insurance Benefits $51,000

Retirement Benefits $11,000

Pension Rate Changes ($4,000)

Actuarial Method Changes ($27,000)

Total $31,000 For the above compensation changes, we should have been provided funding from the GF-State and State Patrol Highway Accounts. This request returns the E-911 Account funding for the debt service ($572,000) and asks for a fund switch of $31,000 that affects appropriations from the E-911 Account, GF-State and State Patrol Highway Accounts to cover compensation changes. Ms. Heidi Thomsen is the subject matter expert for this request and she can be reached at (360) 596-4046. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? This request does not affect performance outcomes. Performance Measure Detail. No agency performance measures are affected by this request. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This proposal is consistent with our strategic commitment to implementing our budget while complying with the provisions of state budget and accounting standards. Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? This fund switch between GF-State, State Patrol Highway Account and the E-911 Account is needed to ensure that increased costs for compensation for the Communications Division are funded.



What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? There are no other alternatives. We have completed the debt service payments for the Certification Participation for the CAD equipment; therefore the $572,000 of our E-911 Account appropriation is no longer needed. A fund switch between the E-911 Account, GF-State and State Patrol Highway Account is needed to ensure adequate funding for compensation for the Communications Division. What are the consequences of not funding this package? If the fund switch is not provided, then the Communications Division will suffer a budget reduction of $31,000. This is equivalent to approximately nine months of salaries and benefits for a call taker. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. The financial data provided in this request is per the budget steps in the 2003-05 and 2009-11 biennia. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? This request is ongoing. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget.

SUBOBJECT DETAIL


1. Expenditures by SubobjectRetirement BB (4,000) (16,000) (20,000)

Health Insurance BD 5,000 46,000 51,000

Debt Service P (302,000) (301,000) (603,000)

Total ($301,000) ($271,000) ($572,000)

2. Employment: FTEs by Year:Commissioned Employees - Civil Service Employees - Total FTEs - - -



SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $30,500 $30,500 $30,500

FTEs


Expenditures: $500 $500 $500

FTEs

Operating - Enhanced 911 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: ($603,000) ($603,000) ($603,000)

FTEs

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: ($572,000) ($572,000) ($572,000)

FTEs - - -



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AH Pursuit Vehicle Replacement Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol operates a fleet of 1,546 vehicles, 836 of which are pursuit vehicles. Our vehicles are used for direct law enforcement and emergency response activities as well as specialized functions and general transportation. This proposal seeks funding to implement a plan that maintains pursuit vehicle replacement at 110,000 miles. This request impacts the Highway Traffic Enforcement activity. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION Based upon the vehicle lifecycle model completed in 2010, mileage on the Crown Victoria pursuit vehicles continues to rise above the optimum 110,000 miles driven. This increases maintenance costs and decreases resale value. We are requesting funding in the amount of $5,238,000 to purchase and outfit 129 pursuit-rated vehicles to restore vehicle turn in mileage to the optimal 110,000 miles. This package includes 4.3 project FTEs to support the installation of equipment on the new vehicles, the tear down of equipment from used vehicles, as well as the acquisition of essential law enforcement equipment that is installed in pursuit vehicles.

FISCAL DETAIL




Program 030 2,636,900 2,601,100 5,238,000

Total $2,636,900 $2,601,100 $5,238,000

2. Staffing (FTEs) 4.3 4.3 4.3


A - Salaries $199,200 $199,200 $398,400

B - Benefits 78,000 78,000 156,000

E – Goods and Services 22,900 22,900 45,800

G – Travel 5,200 5,200 10,400

J – Equipment 2,331,600 2,295,800 4,627,400

Total Objects $2,636,900 $2,601,100 $5,238,000



Mr. Paul Stray is the subject matter expert for this request and he can be reached at (360) 596-6042. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? By increasing the funding for vehicles, we will be able to meet the optimum turn-in mileage of 110,000 miles by purchasing 129 pursuit-rated vehicles and installing essential law enforcement equipment on them. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies in our strategic plan and is directly related to the following Washington State Patrol goal and priority: Goal #5: Provide critical leadership, tools, and resources to foster an ethical, innovative, knowledgeable, and diverse workforce. Priority #5.3: Improve the condition and sustainability of agency facilities, vehicles, and equipment. Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide strategy:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? Based upon current projections, we will need to receive this requested funding to reduce the turn in mileage from the current level of approximately 138,650 miles to the optimum 110,000 miles. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? We continue to work diligently to adopt strategies for efficient and effective management of our fleet. One example that we are looking into is the Lakewood Police Department’s decision to refurbish components of their vehicles instead of replacing the vehicle. We have contacted the Lakewood Police Department to request the data used to make their decision. We have not yet received Lakewood’s data. As additional data is received from Lakewood Police Department, we will analyze this information to determine whether there are any measures that could be implemented in support of maintaining our pursuit vehicle fleet.



What are the consequences of not funding this package? Failure to obtain adequate funding for replacement vehicles will mean that the turn in mileage will continue to increase. Additionally, as the mileage increases, we will experience an increase in maintenance costs. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. Expenditures include salary and benefit costs for 2.8 FTEs (Equipment Technician 3) to install the equipment on the new vehicles, a 0.5 FTE (Equipment Technician 1) to provide the tear down of turned in vehicles and 1.0 FTE (Procurement and Supply Specialist) to order the parts for these additional 129 vehicles. These FTEs will be hired for the 2011-13 Biennium only. Our rules of thumb costs are included for Goods and Services and Travel for these personnel. The cost of each vehicle includes the purchase price of $23,800 plus equipping costs of $7,300 and a Motorola radio at a cost of $5,631 for a total of $36,731. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? All costs are one-time costs to enable the pursuit vehicle turn in mileage to be reduced to 110,000 miles. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: The following calculations are based upon the 2010 Ford Crown Victoria state contract vehicle pricing, as well as current equipment pricing. The Crown Victoria is being phased out by Ford in March 2011 and replaced by a new pursuit platform in fall 2011. The new platform chosen may not have the same contract pricing or equipment costs as the current model. The below is the most accurate cost estimate that can be provided at this time. Once the new models become available for purchase, the Office of State Procurement will establish a contract and associated pricing. Salvage value of $1,240 per vehicle is subtracted from the expenditures.



SUBOBJECT DETAIL


1. Expenditures by SubobjectClassified Salaries AA $199,200 $199,200 $398,400 Social Security BA 12,000 12,000 24,000 Retirement Benefits BB 10,800 10,800 21,600 Industrial Insurance BC 7,200 7,200 14,400 Health Insurance BD 44,400 44,400 88,800 Medicare BH 3,600 3,600 7,200 Supplies and Materials EA 10,300 10,300 20,600 Phone and Postage EB 7,400 7,400 14,800 Professional Development EG 5,200 5,200 10,400 In State Travel GA 5,200 5,200 10,400 Furnishings, Equipment JA 5,200 5,200 10,400 Equipment JC 2,407,000 2,370,000 4,777,000 Equipment - Salvage JC3001 (80,600) (79,400) (160,000)

Total $2,636,900 $2,601,100 $5,238,000

2. Employment: FTEs by Year:Commissioned Employees - - - Civil Service Employees 4.3 4.3 4.3 Total FTEs 4.3 4.3 4.3

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures:

Program 030 $5,238,000 $0 $0

FTEs 4.3 - -

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $5,238,000 $0 $0

FTEs 4.3 - -



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AI Field Force Staffing Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT This proposal is to provide funding for 56.5 additional commissioned FTEs and 10.3 civil service FTEs (phased in over two years) to fully staff the Washington State Patrol Field Operations Bureau (FOB) and provide dispatcher support to the new troopers. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION This request is for 56.5 commissioned FTEs and 10.3 civil service FTEs (phased in over two years) to fully staff the Washington State Patrol Field Operations Bureau (FOB) and provide dispatcher support to the new troopers. The additional troopers will respond to calls for service, investigate collisions, and increase enforcement of impaired driving, speeding, and aggressive driving. The basis for this request to increase commissioned officer staffing is the Police Allocation Model (PAM) and a copy of this is available upon request. The Police Allocation Model is a police and traffic staffing model used by many police agencies in the United States. The model was developed from 1989 to 1993 by Northwestern University Center for Public Safety (NUCPS). By 2001, approximately 20 state police agencies were using PAM to make staffing allocation decisions.


State Patrol Highway Account - 010 2,384,120 4,614,590 6,998,710

State Patrol Highway Account - 030 622,250 2,472,490 3,094,740

Total $3,033,100 $7,150,100 $10,183,200

2. Staffing (FTEs) 29.5 63.8 46.7


A – Salaries and Wages $1,270,900 $3,320,000 $4,590,900

B – Employee Benefits 502,500 1,044,100 1,546,600

E – Goods and Services 628,400 1,177,000 1,805,400

G – Travel 35,800 150,600 186,400

J – Equipment 595,500 1,458,400 2,053,900

Total Objects $3,033,100 $7,150,100 $10,183,200



The Washington State Patrol began using PAM in the mid-1990s. At the request of the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC), a validation effort was conducted from 1999 to 2001. At the end of that effort, we received an updated, customized model from NUCPS. The Police Allocation Model uses 55 data input parameters per autonomous patrol area (APA). We have 39 patrol APAs which require 2,145 items of data input to this model. The data inputs include the following:

• Physical characteristics such as square miles, road miles, etc.

• Operational policies such as the length of a Patrol Interval.

• Workload history such as time spent on calls for service, self-initiated contacts, administrative time, etc.

• Performance objectives such as the Immediate Response Objective (percentage required), and Emergency Response Time.

The model calculates the number of troopers and sergeants required in each APA by calculating the data inputs. This model was last updated in September 2006 which included the following efforts:

• Reviewing and updating policy parameters for each APA (patrol interval, response time, etc.)

• Conducting a speed survey to update the average patrol speed by APA.

• Running the model under numerous scenarios with sensitivity analysis. Captain Chris Gundermann is the subject matter expert for this request and he can be reached at (360) 596-4131. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT Commissioned officer staffing levels have not kept up with the growth in population, licensed drivers, or registered motor vehicles in Washington. The last major increase in Field Force trooper staffing was in 2000. Since then, the state’s population has increased 10.8 percent between 2000 and 2008, licensed drivers have increased 18.0 percent between 2000 and 2009, and the number of registered motor vehicles has increased 12.2 percent between 2000 and 2009. What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? The deployment of 56.5 additional commissioned personnel represents a 6.7 percent increase in the Field Force staffing. With these additional resources, we expect to see a corresponding increase in the number of impaired drivers arrested and other hazardous violations cited. The motoring public can expect a shorter wait for roadside assistance, more frequent checks of rest areas, quicker response to collisions and other calls-for-service, and fewer collisions as driver behavior is changed through increased education and enforcement.



Washington State Patrol partner agencies will experience increased trooper availability for interagency cooperation and assistance. Performance Measure Detail. This decision package will help reduce highway fatalities and injuries, two of the Governor’s indicators and measures of the safety of people and property. With this additional staffing, we expect to see a reduction of 4 percent in the number of fatalities on state routes and interstates. We expect fatalities to decrease from 54 to 52 for FY 2012. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This decision package is essential to implement several strategies identified in the Washington State Patrol Strategic Plan. It also supports the following WSP goal and priorities: Goal #1: Make Washington roadways and ferries safe for the efficient transit of

people and goods. Priority #1.1 Reduce fatality and injury collisions on interstate highways and state

routes by 4 percent. Priority #1.2 Reduce road closure time involving the number of over-90-minute

incidents by 5 percent. Funding this request will allow us to deploy additional officers to the field in further support of Target Zero (zero traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2030). Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Provide for the Safety of People and Property. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide strategy:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? The additional troopers and sergeants will be strategically deployed across the state where the data indicates they will have the greatest impact on improving the level of service to the citizens of the state of Washington. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? The Washington State Patrol is currently exploring two technology-based alternatives:



Photo Enforcement - A pilot project to explore photo enforcement of speed violations was authorized by the Legislature and implemented in 2009 in construction zones on I-5 in Lewis and Thurston counties. This project has shown initial success as a specialized enforcement tool for unique areas such as construction zones where enforcement by troopers in patrol cars is not safe or practical. Although photo enforcement can be an effective deterrent to speeding, it will never be able to replace commissioned enforcement personnel who assist the motoring public, investigate collisions, and detect and arrest impaired drivers. Statewide Electronic Collision and Ticket Online Records (SECTOR) – SECTOR increases officer efficiency and reduces on-scene collision investigation time. Driver and vehicle information is collected electronically and paperless citations and collision reports are created which are then transmitted to partner agencies. While SECTOR allows the trooper to work more efficiently, it does not address the issue of having enough troopers to effectively patrol the highways, assist the public, respond to collisions and calls for service, and stop traffic violators. What are the consequences of not funding this package? If no funding is provided, then some areas of the state will continue to have inadequate Washington State Patrol coverage, citizens will wait longer for a trooper to respond to provide assistance or investigate a collision, and fewer impaired or reckless drivers will be arrested. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. Based on the attrition rate of two per month, we assume that a class of 45 cadets will need to begin in July 2011 to fill positions that have become vacant due to retirements and separations. Since this is not a full cadet class, we can fill the class with 15 additional cadets which are part of this request and are assumed to graduate in March 2012. Fifty five cadets (35 are a part of this request and 20 are to address anticipated attrition) will begin training in January 2012 and will graduate September 2012. Two senior troopers will be promoted to sergeant to coincide with the first graduation and the additional four senior troopers will be promoted to sergeant to coincide with the second graduation. Expenditures include salary and benefit costs for positions, including agency rule-of-thumb expenditures for goods and services, travel and equipment. To administer the program, we estimated the cost of 0.34 FTE, a Senior Telecommunications Specialist in the Electronic Services Division, including agency



rule-of-thumb expenditures for new FTEs. An additional $34,760 per year will be required to support staff in Electronic Services Division for increased radio maintenance, radar calibration and court testimony. These costs are phased in to coincide with the graduation of the first 15 troopers. Adding troopers to the Field Force will have an impact to the Communications Division. During the past 10 years the Communications Division has seen no increase in staffing, however workload has increased significantly and this increase in Field Force staffing will further increase workload. The total change for Communications Division will be an increase of ten dispatchers (Communication Officer 1). The increase in Communications Officer positions is also scheduled to coincide with the class graduations. This is two for the first class and an additional eight for the second class. PAM shows many districts need extra staff, while some districts may not. The Communications Division will be unable to continue to provide 24/7 emergency call services to the citizens and dispatching services to other law enforcement in the region efficiently if communication staffing is cut. There is no revenue associated with this decision package. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? One-time costs include salaries and benefits for cadets and the initial outfitting for the cadets including vehicles. Ongoing costs are salaries and benefits for troopers, sergeants, Communication Officers and the Senior Telecommunications Specialist. Ongoing costs also include supplies and materials, vehicle maintenance, equipment, vehicle replacement, and travel. Expenditure calculations and assumptions:



SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures:

Program - 010 6,998,710 9,984,215 11,270,380

Program - 030 3,094,740 2,889,340 2,557,440

FTEs 46.2 66.0 66.0


Expenditures: 89,750 137,290 150,280

FTEs 0.5 0.8 0.8

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $10,183,200 $13,010,845 $13,978,100

FTEs 46.7 66.8 66.8



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AG Mobile Office Platform Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol seeks funding to fully deploy and sustain the Mobile Office Platform (MOP) concept with an in-car computer with the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) application and digital video system for every trooper’s patrol vehicle. This proposal will demonstrate that the program will have significant impact on officer efficiency and data accuracy, officer and public safety, and liability mitigation. This request impacts all activities. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION This proposal seeks funding to replace existing in-car computers and laptops as they reach the end of their useful life; roll out Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) and in-car video to trooper’s vehicles that don’t currently have these capabilities; make server upgrades to provide space for video footage received through the expansion of the in-car digital video cameras; replace the current query application, including upgrades to vehicle network connectivity which allows troopers to conduct driver checks electronically; and provide staffing for maintenance of the Mobile Office Platform (MOP) equipment and for one Geographic Information System (GIS)

FISCAL DETAIL




State Patrol Highway Account - 010 131,900 184,900 316,800

State Patrol Highway Account - 030 4,275,800 2,698,600 6,974,400

Total $5,106,000 $3,135,400 $8,241,400

2. Staffing (FTEs) 6.0 8.0 7.0


A – Salaries and Wages $415,200 $544,700 $959,900

B – Employee Benefits 118,800 156,700 275,500


G – Travel 8,400 10,800 19,200

J – Equipment 4,410,400 1,945,000 6,355,400

Total Objects $5,106,000 $3,135,400 $8,241,400



mapping position to implement Global Positioning System (GPS) and Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) capabilities of the system.

This proposal also requests funding a five year replacement cycle of computers, cameras, and other hardware in future biennia. Due to a patchwork of one-time grant funding, our efforts to expand or even sustain the MOP including the SECTOR and digital video, have produced a unsustainable mix of equipment installations. Ideally, we would like to have the vehicles electronically linked to applicable networks so that officers can seek information and upload information from vehicles. Currently, most WSP vehicles with in-vehicle computers used for the SECTOR application are unable to query electronic driver checks or vehicle information except by radio. Only one in six patrol vehicles are equipped with an in-vehicle digital video system. We have 440 SECTOR computers which were largely paid for by grants from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (220 vehicles short of full deployment), and 107 digital video cameras which were primarily paid for by one-time legislative appropriations tied to DUI cost recovery revenue (549 vehicles short of full deployment).

The subject matter expert for this request Mr. Marty Knorr and he may be contacted at (360) 705-5184. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT

What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? By implementing the mobile office platform concept, we will achieve the following desired results:

SECTOR BENEFITS/EFFICIENCIES Timeliness of Collision Reports and Data - Each partner agency has time savings in the processing of citations and collision reports. A Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) study showed that the average number of days from the date of a collision to the time the collision report is received was reduced by 12 days (from 15 days) with electronic (SECTOR) reports. In addition, the average number of days from the date of the collision until the completed record was available for analysis dropped from 82 days for paper reports to 21 days for electronic reports.

Data Accuracy - In 2008, WSDOT reported that 17 percent of the collision reports submitted manually were returned to officers for legibility or correction issues. During this period, only 0.7 percent of the SECTOR-generated collision reports were returned to officers for correction.

Efficiency in Officer Time - A Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) study concluded that SECTOR increases an officer’s efficiency for writing tickets and collision reports by 30 percent, saving the officer a minute for every ticket issued (which equates to about 490,970 officer hours or an estimated $322,000 in savings per year), and for collision reports it allows troopers to clear the scene an average of seven minutes faster, reducing road closure time which could save the state $2,376,064 in reduction of traffic congestion. This not only saves a trooper valuable time, but it can get those



involved in the collision off the road faster, reducing the exposure to additional accidents. In addition, data shows that troopers who have SECTOR stop more vehicles than before they had SECTOR, largely due to the time savings for processing each violation, which could increase the number of contacts made, further driving down the state’s costs associated with fatal and injury collisions.

Radio Communications Efficiency - SECTOR reduces radio traffic between troopers and communications officers by allowing the trooper to populate collision and ticket documents with driver-occupant information and exchange of information forms. DIGITAL VIDEO BENEFITS / EFFICIENCIES Liability Mitigation - The existence of video evidence has resulted in significant cost savings for staff time to investigate claims and has also resulted in lawsuits that have been dropped or dismissed due to impartial video footage. As an example, in 2003, a lawsuit was brought forward by an individual who claimed troopers had aggravated a pre-existing heart condition and caused emotional suffering. The United States District Court did not award the plantiff any money due to the video evidence captured and presented. The total savings to the state for this case (including attorney costs) was $3,019,818. There are several additional examples that can be provided where significant cost savings to WSP and the state can be demonstrated through the use of this technology.

Crime Evidence - Digital video provides evidence of crimes, such as DUIs, assaults and felony collisions being enforced by troopers. This evidence makes a much stronger case when presented to the judicial system.

Officer and Suspect Safety - Suspects who know that there is a video running at traffic stops are less likely to be combative. This reduces the risk to officers and suspects from a confrontation or assault. Additionally, when use of force is necessary by an officer, the entire event is often captured allowing for a more efficient review of facts by commanding officers and providing clear evidence and increased transparency to the public.

Performance Measure Detail. This request affects the following agency performance measures:

• Average duration of 90 minute closures on the 9-key interstates and state routes. The current target is 155 minutes. It is anticipated that SECTOR will reduce this target by seven minutes.

• Number of collisions resulting in fatalities on state routes and interstates. It is anticipated that fatalities and fatal collisions will decline with stepped up enforcement. Data shows that officers equipped with SECTOR are able to apply more time to enforcement as efficiencies free up time from administrative work.

Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies in our strategic plan and is directly related to the following WSP goals and priority:



Goal #1: Make Washington roadways and ferries safe for the efficient transit of people and goods.

Goal #4: Leverage technology to enhance and sustain business processes, public safety infrastructure, and statewide emergency communications interoperability.

Priority # 4.3: Integrate, standardize, and enhance officer vehicle (mobile office) technology and applications.

Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This decision package directly supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. The items requested in this proposal will provide the tools that will lead to greater efficiency for law enforcement in their jobs, leading to greater public safety benefits for the state’s citizens. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide results:


effectively - Improve statewide mobility of people, goods, and services.

What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? This proposal will receive a wide range of support from county and city law enforcement, citizens of Washington State, and our public safety partners engaged with Washington State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Target Zero). The courts will be supportive of an increase in SECTOR equipment as it increases the efficiency in processing tickets. Washington State Department of Transportation is supportive of this request as it will result in increased efficiency in processing collision reports and potentially decreased road closure time.

A survey of citizens across the United States conducted by the International Association of Chiefs of Police in 2004 found that 97 percent of those citizens polled supported the use of in-car cameras for law enforcement. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? The following is a summary of alternatives explored and reasons for not choosing them:

- Continue with grant funding for mobile office vehicle equipment. Relying on one-time future requests for replacement funding adds a large element of uncertainty and risk to the project. In addition, this funding does not include the staff support necessary to fully implement the program.

- Submit request legislation to implement a new fee for traffic tickets or collision citations to be deposited into a dedicated account that all law enforcement could draw from for their technology needs. The funding would then be distributed through the WTSC via a grant application process. This would not address the



staff support needed to implement the program and adds an element of uncertainty for the ability to replace equipment.

This request allows for a phased in approach for implementation which will reduce the impact to our Property Management Division for the installation of the equipment and to both our Information Technology Division and Electronic Services Division for the support and maintenance of the equipment. What are the consequences of not funding this package? If this request is not funded, we will not have the structure in place to continue to expand this program statewide and ensure the ability to fund replacement of aging equipment and technology. Not replacing our current computers at the end of their useful life could reduce the amount of computers we have from 440 to having 357 in FY 2012 and 225 in FY 2013. Since over 65 percent of the tickets transmitted using SECTOR are created by our troopers, not funding the replacement of this equipment will also have an impact on both the courts’ and WSDOT’s ability to process ticket and collision record information. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. There are no expected revenues for this decision package, though video evidence could be key in the successful prosecution of additional DUIs, which in turn could provide additional revenue. It is expected that this proposal will provide time savings within the WSP, the WSDOT, and the courts. Information technology equipment costs are based on unit cost estimates for equipment (data storage, server) per quotes from potential vendors. Equipment replacement costs are based on an anticipated life of five years. FTE costs are based on the current salary of proposed positions at Step L, with current benefit rates, and with standard rule of thumb non-payroll costs. We are not requesting funding for Forms and Evidence Analyst 3s that will be required to manage the video evidence that will result from this proposal. As part of this proposal, we plan to develop internally the automation of the Time Activity Report (TAR) system so that when the trooper scans the drivers license it will populate the data fields for both reports (SECTOR and TAR). This can be done if the equipment and networking requested in this proposal are funded. If troopers can do electronic TARs, it will reduce the amount of time it takes for office staff to enter and verify the data, freeing up funds that we can use to pay for the Forms and Evidence Analysts.



Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? For the details of the ongoing costs vs. one-time costs, please see the backup spreadsheets. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget.

SUBOBJECT DETAIL

CALCULATIONS FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTAL 1. Expenditures by Subobject

State Classified Salaries AA $415,200 $544,700 $959,900 Social Security BA $25,800 $33,800 59,600 Retirement BB 22,100 28,900 51,000 Industrial Insurance BC 3,500 4,200 7,700 Health Insurance BD 61,200 81,600 142,800 Medicare BH 6,200 8,200 14,400 Supplies/Materials EA 14,400 19,200 33,600 Telephone and Postage EB 96,700 187,200 283,900 DIS Enterprise Agreement EE 35,400 35,400 Professional Development EG 7,200 9,600 16,800 Software Maintenance EY 34,900 226,800 261,700 In-State Travel GA 7,200 9,600 16,800 Out-of-State Travel GF 1,200 1,200 2,400 Non-capitalized Equipment JA 2,685,400 1,945,000 4,630,400 Software JB 1,725,000 1,725,000 Total $5,106,000 $3,135,400 $8,241,400

2. Employment: FTEs by Year:Civil Service Employees 6.0 8.0 7.0 Total FTEs 6.0 8.0 7.0

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Program 010 Expenditures: 316,800 655,100 1,065,100

Program 030 Expenditures: 6,974,400 5,729,100 5,872,400

Program 030 FTEs 5.4 8.1 8.5


Expenditures: 950,200 613,700 633,600

FTEs 1.6 2.4 2.5

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $8,241,400 $6,997,900 $7,571,100

FTEs 7.0 10.5 11.0



COST BREAKDOWN FOR BIENNIUM 2011-13

Fiscal Year 2012

$581,000 Replacement of 83 existing computers $467,600 Purchase of 62 additional computers $749,000 Replacement of 107 in-car digital cameras $217,000 Purchase of 31 additional cameras $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $74,000 Upgrades to servers to handle expansion of cameras $1,725,000 Query replacement $557,400 Connectivity system replacement to allow for data encryption to meet the FBI

Computer Justice Information System (CJIS) rules $99,600 Broadband connection cards (131) and connection fees $632,700

Six FTEs (1 Equipment Technician 3 to serve as equipment installer into vehicles, 2 ITS3 for maintenance of support of MOP equipment, 1 ITS4 who will serve as system administrator, 1 ITS5 who will oversee the structure of the new network system, 1 ITS6 who will serve as overall program manager)

$5,106,000 TOTAL

6 FTEs

Fiscal Year 2013

$924,000 Replacement of 132 existing computers $973,000 Purchase of 139 additional in-car video cameras $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $225,000 Query maintenance $35,400 Connectivity system maintenance $186,800 Broadband connection cards (132) and connection fees for those and for those

purchased earlier $788,500 Six FTEs from FY2012 plus two additional FTEs (2 ITS3 for maintenance and

support of MOP equipment ) $3,135,400 TOTAL

8 FTEs

$8,241,400 2011-2013 TOTAL 6 FTEs in FY2012 and 8 in FY2013, biennialized total of 7

Costs of “computers” above represent the related SECTOR hardware and software costs, while costs of “in-car digital cameras” above represent the in-car digital camera hardware and software costs. Costs for SECTOR are $7,400 per vehicle initially, or $7,000 replacement; for in-car digital cameras are $7,000 new or replacement.



COST BREAKDOWN FOR BIENNIUM 2013-15

Fiscal Year 2014

$1,029,000 Replacement of 147 existing computers $1,078,000 Purchase of 154 additional in-car video cameras $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $225,000 Query maintenance $35,400 Connectivity system maintenance $285,300 Broadband connection cards (147) and connection fees for those and for

those purchased earlier $980,500

Eight FTEs from earlier plus two additional FTEs (1 ITS3 for maintenance and support of MOP equipment, and 1 ITS4 who will serve as a system administrator )

$3,635,900 TOTAL

10 FTEs

Fiscal Year 2015

$546,000 Replacement of 78 existing computers $291,500 Purchase of 39 additional computers $840,000 Purchase of 120 additional in-car video cameras $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $225,000 Query maintenance $35,400 Connectivity system maintenance $358,000 Broadband connection cards (115) and connection fees for those and for

those purchased earlier $1,063,400 Ten FTEs from earlier plus one additional FTE (1 ITS3 for GIS maintenance

and development) $3,362,000 TOTAL

11 FTEs

$6,997,900 2013-15 Total 10 FTEs in FY2014 and 11 in FY2015, biennialized total of 10.5




COST BREAKDOWN FOR BIENNIUM 2015-17 and future Biennia

Fiscal Year 2016

$999,000 Purchase of 138 additional computers $966,000 Purchase of 138 additional in-car video cameras $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $225,000 Query maintenance $35,400 Connectivity system maintenance $446,100 Broadband connection cards (131) and connection fees for those and for

those purchased earlier $1,053,700 Eleven FTEs from earlier $3,727,900 TOTAL

11 FTEs

Fiscal Year 2017 (AND LATER FISCAL YEARS)

$964,600 Standard Technology Replacement (STR) for computers (137.8) assuming five-year life

$164,000 Enterprise Agreement $964,600 STR for cameras (137.8) assuming five-year life $2,700 Spare wiring hardware for computers and cameras $225,000 Query maintenance $35,400 Connectivity system maintenance $433,000 Broadband connection fees $1,053,900 Eleven FTEs from earlier $3,843,200 TOTAL

11 FTEs

$7,571,100 2015-17 Total 11 FTEs

$7,686,400 Future Biennia Total ($7,051,600 SPHA and $634,800 GF) 11 FTEs




This page is intentionally blank.

• •



Appendix A-2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ADDENDUM (Complete one IT Addendum for each decision package. See Section 12.2 of the 2009-11 Operating Budget Instructions, Part 2 for more guidance.) This form is located at http://www.ofm.wa.gov/budget/forms.asp I. Complete questions 1 through 9 for every IT-related Decision Package:

1. Provide a brief description of the Information Technology (IT) components of this decision

package (e.g., the project or commodity investment):

The Washington State Patrol (WSP) seeks funding to fully deploy and sustain the Mobile Office Platform (MOP) concept with an in-car computer with the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) application and digital video system for every trooper’s patrol vehicle. This proposal seeks funding to replace existing in-car computers and laptops as they reach the end of their useful life; roll out SECTOR and in-car video to trooper’s vehicles that don’t currently have these capabilities; make server upgrades to provide space for video footage received through the expansion of the in-car digital video cameras; replace the current query application, including upgrades to vehicle network connectivity which allows troopers to conduct driver checks electronically; and provide staffing for maintenance of the Mobile Office Platform (MOP) equipment and for one Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping position to implement Global Positioning System (GPS) and Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) capabilities of the system.

2. Is the project or commodity investment in the agency’s IT Portfolio: Yes X No

3. What is the oversight level for this project or commodity investment? Attach copy of completed severity/risk matrix located at http://isb.wa.gov/policies/portfolio/severityandriskmatrix.doc. (Severity and Risk Level assessments should be completed with your DIS Senior Technology Management Consultant. The consultant list can be found at http://isb.wa.gov/policies/consultantlist.aspx

The completed Severity and Risk Assessment for this proposed project is located in WSP’s IT Portfolio.

4. What common services will be utilized for this project or commodity investment? The list of common services is available at http://techmall.dis.wa.gov/. None of the listed common services are utilized for this project.

5. Is the required 903 consultation e-mail confirmation for this project or commodity investment attached to the decision package? Yes No X

A current 904 consultation for this decision package is in progress with DIS.

http://www.ofm.wa.gov/budget/forms.asp�

http://isb.wa.gov/policies/portfolio/severityandriskmatrix.doc�

http://isb.wa.gov/policies/consultantlist.aspx�

http://isb.wa.gov/policies/consultantlist.aspx�

http://techmall.dis.wa.gov/�



6. Provide the IT costs and breakdown of all FTEs required to implement this project or commodity investment. Do not include ongoing maintenance costs. If IT costs exceed two years, please extend the list accordingly:

All multi-biennia and multi-phase cost estimates must be submitted electronically tohttp://sharepoint.dis.wa.gov/ofm/dut/OFMSAF/IT%20Addendum/Forms/AllItems.aspx. Specific instructions for this tool can be found in Appendix A-3 of this document.

FTE costs and breakdowns for this project have been provided in Appendix A-3.

7. Ongoing Maintenance and Support Cost Table Provide the IT costs and IT FTE

breakdown for ongoing maintenance and support of this project or commodity investment

Cost Breakdown (maintenance)

Year 1

FY12

Year 2

FY13

Year 3

FY14

Year 4

FY15

Year 5

FY16 Totals

IT FTEs – (For each job type, list the number of staff and the total salary and benefits)

ITAS6 ITAS5 ITAS4 ITAS3 Equipment Tech 3

109,060 99,900 91,440

167,400 66,200

109,060 99,900 91,440

334,800 66,200

109,060 99,900

182,840 418,500 66,200

109,060 99,900

182,920 502,320 66,200

109,060 99,900

182,920 502,320 66,200

545,300 499,500 731,560

1,925,340 331,000

Purchased Services Contracts 0 0 0 0 0 0

Personal Services Contracts 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hardware Purchase or Upgrades

12,500 7,500 8,500 7,000 5000 40,500

Hardware Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0

Software License Purchase or Upgrades

1,300 500 500 300 0 2,600

Software Maintenance 0 1,300 1,800 2,300 2,600 8,000

Hardware Lease or Finance (including servers)

0 0 0 0 0 0

Maintenance & Operations (including DIS)

69,300 57,400 68,000 65,800 58,300 318,800

Training 7,200 9,600 12,000 13,200 13,200 55,200

Travel 8,400 10,800 13,200 14,400 14,400 61,200

Other (specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Annual Total 632,700 788,500 980,500 1,063,400 1,053,900 4,519,000

8. Was a quote provided to you for this project or commodity investment? Yes No X

If yes, who provided the quote and when? Please attach a copy of the quote.

9. Is this investment an e-commerce investment? Yes No X

If yes, a copy of the approved Economic Feasibility Study must be attached to the decision package.

http://sharepoint.dis.wa.gov/ofm/dut/OFMSAF/IT%20Addendum/Forms/AllItems.aspx�

http://sharepoint.dis.wa.gov/ofm/dut/OFMSAF/IT%20Addendum/Forms/AllItems.aspx�



II. Continue completing questions 10 through 14 if the IT request pertains to a project (versus a commodity investment):

10. Is this a new project or a continuation of an existing project? New Continuation X

This decision package contains elements of both a new and existing project. While the WSP currently utilizes in-vehicle computers and cameras for a portion of our field force, this request intends to expand that use to full deployment and create a new program structure for the management and on-going support of mobile office technology.

11. Describe how the Project Manager will be acquired and the intended Quality Assurance process (i.e., existing state employees, hire new staff, or contract with vendor):

WSP plans to utilize existing state employees to conduct specific project management assignments. Quality assurance would likely be contracted with a vendor.

12. Describe your project management approach.

WSP will manage the project utilizing our Project Management Methodology (PMM). The PMM enables WSP to standardize the way IT projects are managed. Documented processes make the PMM a repeatable process which saves the agency time and money. The decision package requests funding for a Program Manager and a Network and System administrator. These key positions will provide management for the project.

13. Provide the estimated project duration and estimated start and end date.

Funding is requested to operate the MOP program from FY 2012 through FY2019. The program maintenance and operation will be on-going beyond FY 2019.

14. Where will the system be hosted?

The system will be hosted on WSP servers and within WSP Trooper vehicles.




• •

IT Addendum

Decision Package Code:

PL-AGDecision Package Title: Mobile Office Platform

Project Title (ITPMS): Mobile Office Platform (MOP)

Agency: Washington State Patrol Preparer: Shawn Eckhart Contact Phone: (360) 596-4080

Phase Estimates for:

PreDesignFile Attachment

IT FTEs Biennium Job Classification FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-18

ITS3 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5 0.8 1.4 0.8 0.0

ITS4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.0

ITS5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0

ITS/AS6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0

Equipment Tec h 3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0

Total FTEs 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.6 1.4 0.0

Salaries & Benefits 133,500 175,350 219,125 240,100 240,100 308,850 459,225 240,100 0

Purchased Services 0 0 0 0

Personal Service

Contracts 0 0 0 0

Hardware Purchases or

Upgrades 0 0 0 0

Hardware Maintenance 0 0 0 0

Software Purchases or

Upgrades 431,250 431,250 0 0 0

Software Maintenance 0 0 0 0

Hardware Lease &

Finance 0 0 0 0

Training 1,800 2400 3,000 3,300 3,300 4,200 6,300 3,300 0

Travel 2,100 2,700 3,300 3,600 3,600 4,800 6,900 3,600 0

Other

7,950

10,600

13,250

14,575

14,575

18,550

27,825

14,575

0

Subtotal 576,600 191,050 238,675 261,575 261,575 0 0 0 767,650 500,250 261,575 0

Please provide a narrative summary, notes and assumptions, of non-staffing cost items

Click "Insert Item" below to add another phase cost detail

Contingency

Per budget

instructions...

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inflation 3.0 0 17,298 14,321 23,542 31,389 0 0 0 17,298 37,862 31,389 0

Total 576,600 208,348 252,996 285,117 292,964 0 0 0 784,948 538,112 292,964 0

Account-EA (e.g., 001-1)

001-1 130,000 41,350 52,325 57,600 57,600 0 0 0 171,350 109,925 57,600 0

081-1 446,600 149,700 186,350 203,975 203,975 0 0 0 596,300 390,325 203,975 0

Total All Accounts 576,600 191,050 238,675 261,575 261,575 0 0 0 767,650 500,250 261,575 0

Check Total Tota l Phase - Total All Accounts 0 17,298 14,321 23,542 31,389 0 0 0

No inflation or contingency singled out in decision package Non-staffing items include 25% of query software replacement


DesignFile Attachment


ITS3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.0

ITS4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0

ITS5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0

ITS/AS6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0

Equipment Tec h 3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0

Total FTEs 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.0

Salaries & Benefits 53,400 70,140 87,650 96,040 96,040 123,540 183,690 96,040 0


Personal Service

Contracts 0 0 0 0


Upgrades 74,000 74,000 0 0 0

Hardware Maintenance 0 0 0 0




Upgrades 172,500 172,500 0 0 0

Software Maintenance 0 0 0 0

Hardware Lease &

Finance 0 0 0 0

Training 720 960 1,200 1,320 1,320 1,680 2,520 1,320 0

Travel 840 1,080 1,320 1,440 1,440 1,920 2,760 1,440 0

Other

3,180

4,240

5,300

5,830

5,830

7,420

11,130

5,830

0

Subtotal 304,640 76,420 95,470 104,630 104,630 0 0 0 381,060 200,100 104,630 0

Contingency

Per budget

instructions...

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inflation 3.0 0 9,139 5,728 9,417 12,556 0 0 0 9,139 15,145 12,556 0

Total 304,640 85,559 101,198 114,047 117,186 0 0 0 390,199 215,245 117,186 0


001-1 69,040 18,100 20,930 23,030 23,030 0 0 87,140 43,960 23,030 0

081-1 235,600 58,320 74,540 81,600 81,600 0 0 0 293,920 156,140 81,600 0

Total All Accounts 304,640 76,420 95,470 104,630 104,630 0 0 0 381,060 200,100 104,630 0

Check Total Tota l Phase - Total All Accounts 0 9,139 5,728 9,417 12,556 0 0 0

No inflation or contingency singled out in decision package No-staffing items include server upgrades, and 10% of query software replacement


Construction/ImplementationFile Attachment


ITS3 1.3 2.6 3.3 3.9 3.9 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 3.6 5.0 6.0

ITS4 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.7 1.3 1.7 2.0

ITS5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0


ITS/AS6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0

Equipment Tec h 3 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0

Total FTEs 3.9 5.2 6.5 7.2 7.2 11.0 11.0 11.0 4.6 6.8 9.1 11.0

Salaries & Benefits 347,100 455,910 569,725 624,260 624,260 960,400 960,400 960,400 803,010 1,193,985 1,584,660 1,920,800


Personal Service

Contracts 0 0 0 0


Upgrades 2,566,700 1,920,400 2,132,900 1,680,200 1,952,800 1,936,900 1,936,900 1,936,900 4,487,100 3,813,100 3,889,700 3,873,800

Hardware Maintenance 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 70,800 70,800 70,800


Upgrades 1,156,150 500 500 18,750 32,800 1,156,650 19,250 32,800 0

Software Maintenance 226,300 226,800 227,350 227,600 391,600 391,600 391,600 226,300 454,150 619,200 783,200

Hardware Lease &

Finance 0 0 0 0

Training 4,680 6240 7,800 8,580 8,580 13,200 13,200 13,200 10,920 16,380 21,780 26,400

Travel 5,460 7,020 8,580 9,360 9,360 14,400 14,400 14,400 12,480 17,940 23,760 28,800

Other

144,670

216,160

320,050

391,895

470,895

491,300

491,300

491,300

360,830

711,945

962,195

982,600

Subtotal 4,224,760 2,867,930 3,301,755 2,995,795 3,361,695 3,843,200 3,843,200 3,843,200 7,092,690 6,297,550 7,204,895 7,686,400

Contingency

Per budget

instructions...

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inflation 3.0 0 126,743 198,105 269,622 403,403 576,480 691,776 807,072 126,743 467,727 979,883 1,498,848

Total 4,224,760 2,994,673 3,499,860 3,265,417 3,765,098 4,419,680 4,534,976 4,650,272 7,219,433 6,765,277 8,184,778 9,185,248


001-1 499,260 192,450 225,845 233,970 235,570 317,400 317,400 317,400 691,710 459,815 552,970 634,800

081-1 3,725,500 2,675,480 3,075,910 2,761,825 3,126,125 3,525,800 3,525,800 3,525,800 6,400,980 5,837,735 6,651,925 7,051,600

Total All Accounts 4,224,760 2,867,930 3,301,755 2,995,795 3,361,695 3,843,200 3,843,200 3,843,200 7,092,690 6,297,550 7,204,895 7,686,400

Check Total Tota l Phase - To tal All Accounts 0 126,743 198,105 269,622 403,403 576,480 691,776 807,072


No inflation or contingency singled out in decision package Non-staffing items include:

Replacement of, or init ial purchase of, hardware and software supporting SECTOR (Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting) Replacement of, or init ial purchase of, in-car digital video cameras, and associated hardware and software Microsoft Enterprise agreement costs for computer software 65% of query software replacement, and future related software maintenance Initial network connec tivity costs, and future related hardware maintenance Broadband connection card init ial purchase, and monthly connection fees

Total All Phases (section may be hidden if only one phase)

Biennium FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19 Total FTEs 6.0 8.0 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 7.0 10.5 11.0 11.0

Salaries & Benefits 534,000 701,400 876,500 960,400 960,400 960,400 960,400 960,400 1,235,400 1,836,900 1,920,800 1,920,800

Purchased Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Personal Service

Contracts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Upgrades 2,640,700 1,920,400 2,132,900 1,680,200 1,952,800 1,936,900 1,936,900 1,936,900 4,561,100 3,813,100 3,889,700 3,873,800

Hardware Maintenance 0 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 70,800 70,800 70,800


Upgrades 1,759,900 500 500 18,750 32,800 0 0 0 1,760,400 19,250 32,800 0

Software Maintenance 0 226,300 226,800 227,350 227,600 391,600 391,600 391,600 226,300 454,150 619,200 783,200

Hardware Lease &

Finance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training 7,200 9,600 12,000 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 16,800 25,200 26,400 26,400

Travel 8,400 10,800 13,200 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 19,200 27,600 28,800 28,800

Other 155,800 231,000 338,600 412,300 491,300 491,300 491,300 491,300 386,800 982,600 982,600 982,600

Subtotal All Phases 5,106,000 3,135,400 3,635,900 3,362,000 3,727,900 3,843,200 3,843,200 3,843,200 8,241,400 750,900 7,571,100 7,686,400

Contingency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Inflation 0 153,180 218,154 302,580 447,348 576,480 691,776 807,072 153,180 520,734 1,023,828 1,498,848

Grand Total 5,106,000 3,288,580 3,854,054 3,664,580 4,175,248 4,419,680 4,534,976 4,650,272 8,394,580 7,518,634 8,594,928 9,185,248



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AC DNA Kits Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The requests from police agencies for DNA analysis by the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division (CLD) have increased by 30 percent in recent years with no subsequent increase in funding for DNA kits and supplies. This, coupled with a 26 percent increase in DNA costs since last biennium has created a shortfall in the CLD budget. The Washington State Patrol has temporarily covered the shortfall by holding scientist positions vacant and delaying equipment replacement, but cannot sustain this adjustment long-term. Ongoing funding in the amount of $1,063,000 per biennium for DNA kits and supplies is critical and is being requested to ensure that forensic scientists have sufficient supplies to keep up with the increasing demand for DNA casework services. This proposal impacts the Crime Laboratory activity. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION This decision package requests $1,063,000 per biennium for DNA kits and supplies to ensure that forensic scientists have sufficient supplies to keep up with the increasing demand for DNA casework services. A DNA kit is composed of two components that contain a set of DNA primers and enzymes that isolate and amplify a number of different locations on a piece of DNA.

FISCAL DETAILFY 2012 FY 2013 Total

1. Operating ExpendituresGeneral Fund – State $467,700 $467,700 $935,400 County Criminal Justice Assistance Acct 42,500 42,500 85,000 Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance 21,300 21,300 42,600 Total $531,500 $531,500 $1,063,000


3. Objects of ExpenditureE – Goods and Services 531,500 531,500 1,063,000

Total Objects $531,500 $531,500 $1,063,000



These locations contain unique properties of an individual’s genetic code. The purpose of DNA testing is to determine if there is a match between these unique characteristics in samples from a suspect and/or victim and the crime scene evidence that is being tested. DNA testing has the ability to narrow the probability of accurately identifying the suspect down to one in several quadrillion. There are several factors that are affecting the Crime Laboratory’s consumption of DNA kits and supplies:

DNA costs have increased 26 percent since last biennium. As those scientists performing DNA analysis become more technically proficient

in the use of this extraordinary scientific tool, their case output increases and so does their consumption of DNA kits, reagents and disposable supplies.

Improvements in procedures for DNA analysis have allowed more cases to be done faster, with better quality. This has increased productivity and the usage of DNA kits and supplies.

Increased demand for DNA analysis. DNA requests by police agencies have increased by 30 percent from 2007 to 2009.

As demonstrated in the table below, the demand for DNA casework is increasing as is our backlog. Police agencies and prosecuting attorneys are submitting substantially more requests for DNA analysis and more items as the technology has gone from testing a sample if it is the size of a quarter as was the case in the 1990s to now where a DNA profile can be developed with a few cells invisible to the human eye. This has vastly expanded the usefulness of the analysis. In addition, prosecuting attorneys are requiring more testing due to demands from the courts.

DNA Statistics 2005-2010

YEAR 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010#

DNA Cases Received 1882 2128 2178 2434 2827 3394

DNA Cases Completed 1472 1857 1805 1759 2286 2600

Pending DNA Median Age^ 175 154 113 86 76 74*

DNA Case Backlog 949 893 722 754 788 1221

Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) Hits 98 99 114 319 257 290

^ Average days to completion * Ave. at 6/2010 # Numbers estimated for year based on 1/2010-6/2010 YTD stats.

The above chart shows that between 2005 and 2009:

Case submissions have increased 50 percent. Productivity has increased 55 percent. The median age of the backlog has decreased from ~six months to less than

three months. There are three times the numbers of Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)

hits.



Funding this request will reduce the chance of critical DNA casework being delayed or going unanalyzed due to insufficient funds. The inability to work these cases could allow a suspect to go unidentified or to go free without essential investigative information. Lack of DNA evidence could impact the juries’ ability to reach an informed verdict in violent crimes such as homicides, assaults and rapes. This could have a severe impact on our criminal justice agencies including police agencies and sheriff’s departments, the criminal prosecution and defense, and the safety of our citizens.

The subject matter expert for this request is Ms. Lynn McIntyre, and she can be contacted at (206) 262-6029 NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? By staying fully staffed and with an adequate supply of DNA kits, the Crime Laboratory was able to respond quickly to emergent events like the Montfort officer shooting in Seattle and the fatal shooting of four Lakewood officers. We have temporarily relied upon savings from vacant positions and delayed equipment purchases to cover the budget shortfall created by rising DNA kit costs, demand, and consumption. However, the need to fill the vacant scientist positions is critical, as was recognized by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) in granting hiring freeze exemptions for these positions. The Legislature also acknowledged the criticality of DNA work when it directed that recent budget reductions not include CLD scientists. Long term, we cannot continue to cover the rising cost of DNA kits and the increased demand for such kits unless this request is funded. Performance Measure Detail. This request does not directly affect our performance measures reported in the Results through Performance Management (RPM) system. However, internally we track the median age of completed cases, which is currently 82 days. The requested funding may result in a decrease in the median age of completed cases. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This decision package is directly related to the following WSP goal and priority: Goal #3: Meet the growing need for law enforcement, forensic, investigative, and

public safety services statewide. Priority #3.3 Maintain quality and enhance the services provided by the Forensic Laboratory Services Bureau.



Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Ensuring public safety for our citizens is the essential function of the criminal justice system and the services of the crime laboratory are needed for that to occur. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property Not funding this request will seriously limit the DNA casework of the Crime Laboratory and will negatively impact public safety. Ensuring a proper level of public safety has always been the goal of and a high priority for the State Patrol and allied governmental agencies. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? DNA analysis is crucial to the law enforcement and criminal justice agencies of the state of Washington and contributes to the public safety of all citizens. The success of DNA analysis has increased dependence by police agencies and courts on DNA reports and the amazing information they provide. Juries rely on DNA analysis in many of the prosecutions’ cases. Case to case hits, links of suspects to victims and DNA profiles that solve serial property crimes all have a positive impact on crime investigation in our state. The return to the citizens for their tax dollars is substantial. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? We have attempted to absorb as much of the DNA supplies cost as possible through the following:

- Funding provided by federal grants. - Temporarily leaving DNA scientist positions open even though these positions

have been provided an exemption from the hiring freeze. - Temporarily delaying equipment replacement to cover the cost of DNA

supplies.

Currently, we are working on a procedure that will require less DNA and therefore, decrease DNA analysis costs. In addition, we are streamlining certain types of analysis, such as property crimes, so they can be analyzed faster and more economically. This is not suitable for all types of casework. While these measures have mitigated cost escalations somewhat, the increase in submissions and material costs has exceeded these efficiency savings. The gap is too much to be absorbed within our present budget.



What are the consequences of not funding this package? Failure to acquire adequate financial support for necessary supplies will result in the Washington State Patrol curtailing certain DNA testing and delaying other high priority DNA testing to avoid overspending existing appropriations. The lack of adequate supplies will seriously slow output. As a consequence, investigative information for homicides, rapes, assaults and other serious crimes will be delayed, resulting in delayed adjudication or arrest of serious suspects and allowing them to victimize others. Currently, we have over 1,200 DNA requests waiting for analysis and if DNA cases were suspended for just three months the backlog would quickly be over 2,000 requests. This will jeopardize cases and interfere in law enforcement’s abilities to address the violent crimes in Washington. The Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory will also not be fulfilling the state mandate for forensic services. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? This request is for ongoing funding of $1,063,000 per biennium. Expenditure calculations and assumptions:

SUBOBJECT DETAIL


Supplies/Materials EA 531,500 531,500 1,063,000

Total $531,500 $531,500 $1,063,000

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:


Expenditures: $1,063,000 $1,063,000 $1,063,000

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $1,063,000 $1,063,000 $1,063,000




• •



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AA Fingerprint Record Conversion Budget Period: 2011-13 Biennium Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT As the state’s criminal history repository, the Washington State Patrol has nearly 1.6 million fingerprint records stored electronically in the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) operated by the Western Identification Network (WIN). These records are used in the identification of both criminal and applicant subjects. About 700,000 of these records are stored in an aged, vendor proprietary electronic format. This proposal is for one-time funding to convert these older fingerprint records to a national standard electronic format. This proposal affects the Criminal Records Management activity.

(The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION The Washington State Patrol’s Identification and Criminal History Section is a central identification data sharing resource to all law enforcement, criminal justice, and homeland security agencies within the state of Washington. The section also supports a vital partnership with the western consortium of states through its membership in the Western Identification Network (WIN) and with national criminal history systems. To fulfill its identification and information sharing responsibility, the section must maintain all of its fingerprint records in nationally standardized formats to facilitate identification of criminals, screening of civil applicants and to accommodate electronic data sharing among thousands of partner agencies. The current database contains approximately 700,000 records that are in an aged, vendor proprietary electronic format and need to be converted to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) format to effectively exchange the identification data across jurisdictional lines or between dissimilar systems made by different manufacturers.


1. Operating ExpendituresFingerprint Identification Account – $402,500 $402,500 $805,000 Total $402,500 $402,500 $805,000

3. Objects of ExpenditureE – Goods and Services $402,500 $402,500 $805,000 Total Objects $402,500 $402,500 $805,000



To convert these records, a qualified vendor will be contracted. The vendor will need to electronically convert the original paper fingerprint cards to the NIST specifications. The original paper fingerprint cards will be used in this conversion as they provide the best image. Mr. Jim Anderson is the subject matter expert for criminal records issues and may be reached by telephone at (360) 534-2101. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? The current AFIS is expected to be upgraded by WIN within the next few years. This proposed conversion will ensure Washington State’s entire criminal fingerprint records are searchable by law enforcement and other partner agencies after this upgrade occurs. Performance Measure Detail. This proposal will result in 100 percent of the electronic fingerprint records being stored and searchable in the NIST compliant format. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This decision package is directly related to the following goal and WSP priority: Goal #4: Leverage technology to enhance and sustain business processes, public

safety infrastructure, and statewide emergency communications interoperability.

Priority #4.1 Develop, improve, and sustain agency use of technology with computers,

operating systems, applications, networks, phone systems, radios, and microwave communication systems.

Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety by providing ongoing availability of information to help identify criminals, solve crimes, and keep ineligible persons from being placed in positions of trust. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property The collection and dissemination of identification and criminal history record information is an important component in the process of preventing and solving crimes. The



Washington State Patrol must ensure that the information it provides is accurate and complete which in part, depends on complete and accurate records. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? After the AFIS upgrade, more than 40 percent of Washington’s fingerprint records will be unavailable to law enforcement, criminal justice, and homeland security stakeholders. Washington’s ability to identify criminals and other persons of interest will be diminished by a like amount. There is no other cost effective alternative. High standards based quality records are the only way to enable rapid electronic responses to those agencies charged with providing public safety. It is simply not possible to do this with inaccessible electronic information or paper-based files. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? In lieu of contracting out this work to a private vendor, we have considered to instead complete the conversion with overtime or project employees. This option would require the purchase of a high-volume scanner, software that connects to the AFIS, and increased network capacity to transmit the records. If funding for this project is approved, a thorough cost-benefit analysis of the options will be completed prior to committing to a private vendor. What are the consequences of not funding this package? The fingerprint records will become unavailable in the upgraded AFIS, ultimately reducing the ability of the Washington State Patrol and partner agencies to identify criminals, screen civil applicants, and identify persons of special interest. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. No revenue will be generated as a result of this proposal. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? This proposal is for one-time funding. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: The estimated vendor cost for this project is $1.15 per fingerprint record, including tax and shipping costs.



SUBOBJECT DETAIL


Purchased Services ER $402,500 $402,500 $805,000 Total $402,500 $402,500 $805,000

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Fingerprint Identification Acct. 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $805,000 - -

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17




Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AK Fire Training Academy Funding Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy Level RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol’s Fire Training Academy (FTA) seeks funding for the regular maintenance of the facility’s roads and water system. Funding for these essential activities was provided through a one-time appropriation in the 2009-11 Operating Budget as these activities had been funded in previous biennia in our Capital Budget. Maintenance of the facility’s roads and water system are annual, ongoing activities. The maintenance of these systems is critical to the operation of the FTA, which provides essential firefighter training to agencies and organizations across the state of Washington.

(The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION The Washington State Patrol’s Fire Training Academy (FTA) is located in North Bend, Washington. The service the FTA provides is unique because it offers live-fire training to firefighters and first responders from across the state of Washington. The students trained at the FTA are from fire departments and law enforcement agencies as well as military and private organizations. The FTA operates seven days a week, up to 15 hours a day. The average number of students trained is 6,000 per year for the last two years. The FTA is remotely situated in the mountains above North Bend and has unique road maintenance requirements. Notably, the site regularly experiences heavy snowfall throughout the winter months requiring regular plowing and sanding of the narrow 2.5

FISCAL DETAIL



Fire Service Training Account $140,000 $205,000 $345,000

Total $140,000 $205,000 $345,000




Total Objects $140,000 $205,000 $345,000



mile, one-lane access road. The plowing and sanding is critical for access because the road is bordered in places by deep ditches and drop-offs. There is approximately one mile of interior gravel roadways that provide access throughout the facility. When it snows, it is necessary to immediately plow and treat these roadways to ensure safe movement for both the students and the instructors. In addition to snow removal, the interior gravel roads require grading three times a year and fresh gravel to remove potholes. The combined cost of these activities is $42,000 for the biennium. A functioning water system at the FTA is the key to providing live fire training. The water system is comprised of an integrated fire training and storm water system. Water used for fire training is recaptured by the site’s storm water system, which also collects regular rainfall. The combined fire and rain water moves through an oil-water separator and then into a series of storage ponds. The water is drawn from the ponds and pumped into the fire hydrant system to be reused continuously. The system is operated under permit by the Department of Ecology (DOE) and must meet certain, specific requirements for the removal of a variety of contaminants left over from the training fires. In addition, the fire pumps and associated equipment require regular maintenance and repair to ensure water is available for fire training. The requested $303,000 for the biennium will allow the training water system to be ready to meet training needs as well as the DOE requirements. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? The success of the FTA is dependent upon safe roadway access and an operational training water system that meets the DOE permit requirements. The lack of safe access and/or the loss of the training water system will severely limit or stop all training at the site. The inability to train firefighters and first responders will create a significant inconvenience for organizations that have to reschedule. Most training at the Fire Training Academy is scheduled months in advance due to the overall demand. Some agencies will be unable to reschedule and training opportunities will be lost. Failure to meet the DOE requirements could result in the assessment of significant fines. In addition, lawsuits could also be filed by public and private entities with the potential for expensive litigation and settlement agreements. Performance Measure Detail. Although this funding will not directly increase the number of students trained at the Fire Training Academy, it will help prevent FTA closures due to lack of access to the site or an inoperable water system. Either of these situations will reduce the number of students trained.



Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This decision package is directly related to the following WSP goal and priority: Goal #3: Meet the growing need for law enforcement, forensic, investigative, and public safety services statewide. Priority #3.4 Provide training programs and resources that meet the state’s need for trained law enforcement, fire protection, and criminal justice personnel. Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety through the training of our emergency responders. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? Insufficient funding for the FTA will have a significant impact on the ability to obtain needed maintenance of the facility, which directly impacts the ability to provide training. Closure of the FTA due to lack of access to the site or available training water will cause the primary stakeholders (fire service, law enforcement, military, etc.) to either reschedule or lose training opportunities. Lost training opportunities will reduce the readiness of the students who are unable to train. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? There are no other options available. Additional funding is required to maintain the roads and water system. Redirection of existing FTA funding to cover these maintenance expenses will have a detrimental effect on the entire training program. What are the consequences of not funding this package? Not funding this request may result in cancelling classes, which will result in firefighters and first responders not being trained and ready for emergencies. In addition, the departments and agencies will have to reschedule training, creating frustration and possibly increased training costs due to staffing and scheduling issues. The lack of maintenance funding could create expensive regulatory and legal liabilities arising from the failure to meet the DOE water permit requirements. Also, there is the possibility of environmental impacts if the system does not operate properly. The inability to maintain roadway access during the winter creates both regular and emergency access issues. Live fire training is inherently a high-risk activity and the



roadway must be open for emergency response at all times during training. Grading and removing potholes from the gravel roads reduces the potential for damage to FTA and private vehicles. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? These are ongoing costs to maintain the safe operation of the facility. Expenditure calculations and assumptions:

SUBOBJECT DETAIL


1. Expenditures by SubobjectRepairs, Alterations, and Maint EE 140,000 205,000 345,000 Total $140,000 $205,000 $345,000

2. Employment: FTEs by Year:Commissioned Employees - Civil Service Employees - Total FTEs - - -

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Operating - Fire Service Training Acct. 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: 345,000 345,000 345,000

FTEs - - -

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $345,000 $345,000 $345,000

FTEs - - -



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AB Criminal History Record Retention and

Retrieval Budget Period: 2011-13 Biennium Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Washington State Patrol Identification and Criminal History Section is the state’s repository for criminal history record information received from law enforcement agencies, correctional facilities, and courts throughout the state. The current system used to store and retrieve the over 500,000 criminal history documents received annually is inefficient, aged, and failing. This proposal will fund hiring a vendor to work with the Washington State Patrol, Department of Information Services, and the Secretary of State to develop a feasibility study for replacing the current criminal history record archive and retrieval system. This proposal affects the Criminal Records Management activity. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION The Identification and Criminal History Section films and indexes all documents entered into the Washington State Identification System (WASIS) criminal history database. A copy of developed film is stored at the section for document retrieval purposes and an original set is stored at the Secretary of State Archives for safety and security. All documents and appropriate fingerprint cards are filmed and indexed by state identification number, date of arrest and document type.

Each month, Washington State Patrol staff films and indexes an average of seven new rolls of film of criminal history documents. One roll of film holds approximately 6,000 single-sided documents or 3,000 double-sided documents. The majority of documents filmed are single-sided, which equates to approximately 42,000 documents filmed and indexed each month. In addition to filming and indexing documents, the unit processes 1,000 requests to pull and print documents previously filmed.

FISCAL DETAIL



Fingerprint Identification Account – State $200,000 $200,000

Total $200,000 $0 $200,000


C – Personal Services $200,000 $200,000

Total Objects $200,000 $0 $200,000



The current retention and retrieval system is labor intensive and relies heavily on manual processes. Additionally, the equipment to film the documents is no longer manufactured and is increasingly difficult to repair. However, any replacement of the system must be well-planned, transferable to other areas within the Washington State Patrol that have similar document retention and retrieval needs, and be consistent with current state technology and archiving standards. This proposal will provide funding to consider these requirements through a feasiblity study. The study will include a background and needs assessment, options and proposed solution, and a detailed cost-benefit analysis that will provide the foundation for a future document retention and retrieval replacement proposal. Mr. Jim Anderson is the subject matter expert for criminal records issues and may be reached by telephone at (360) 534-2101. NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? This proposed feasibility study will provide detailed information to make an informed information technology investment decision to replace WSP’s criminal history document retention and retrieval system. Performance Measure Detail. This proposal will not impact performance measures collected or reported by WSP. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This decision package is directly related to the following WSP goal and priority: Goal #4: Leverage technology to enhance and sustain business processes, public


Priority #4.1 Develop, improve, and sustain agency use of technology with computers,

operating systems, applications, networks, phone systems, radios, and microwave communication systems.

Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. This proposal will provide funding for the development of a feasibility study for replacing the current criminal history record archive and retrieval system. Failure of the current retention and retrieval system will negatively impact our ability to meet retention requirements and will result in the inability to verify information stored in WASIS. Ultimately, this failure could impact the criminal history information provided through our background check service.



Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property The collection and dissemination of criminal history record information is an important component in the process of preventing and solving crimes. The Washington State Patrol must ensure that the information it provides is accurate and complete, which, in part, depends on an effective record retention and retrieval system. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? Criminal history record information documents are retained for 99 years from the individual's date of birth. Local law enforcement agencies and the courts retain this information for a much shorter period of time. Consequently, we are the only long-term source for these documents. Failure of the current retention and retreival system will negatively impact the following functions: (1) inquiries from individuals and lawyers, (2) Sex/Kidnapping Offender Registration inquiries, (3) customer service research i.e., persistent offender (3-strikes) cases, court ordered updates to records, and (4) responses to criminal justice agencies throughout the state. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? In lieu of doing a feasibility study, we could have gone directly to replacing the record retention and retrieval system. The downside of this approach would be a higher risk of not successfully completing this technology upgrade and perhaps missing an opportunity for implementing an “enterprise” solution applicable within WSP or across state government. What are the consequences of not funding this package? The existing criminal history record retention and retrieval system will eventually become non-operational, putting the Washington State Patrol at risk of not meeting record retention requirements and being unable to verify information stored in WASIS. What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? None Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. No revenue will be generated as a result of this proposal.



Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? This proposal is for one-time funding. We anticipate using the results of the feasibility study for a future decision package. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: It is assumed that this study will take six months to complete and costs will be approximately $150 per hour.

SUBOBJECT DETAIL


1. Expenditures by SubobjectComputer/Information Services CD $200,000 $200,000 Total $200,000 $0 $200,000

SIX-YEAR ESTIMATES:

Operating - Fingerprint Ident. Acct. 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17


Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Expenditures: $200,000 $0 $0



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AD Out of Service Order Penalties Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy – Revenue Only RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has reported a conflict between the Federal Regulation CFR 383.53(b)(1) and state law governing penalties for a driver and carrier who violate an out of service order. The Washington State Patrol is proposing legislation to resolve this conflict by increasing the amount that may be charged for an Out of Service Order Penalty to be consistent with the federal regulation. This proposal affects State Patrol Highway Account revenue only. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION Currently, Washington State law (RCW 46.32.100(i)) states that a driver of a commercial motor vehicle who violates an out of service order is liable for a penalty of at least $1,100, but not more than $2,750 for each violation. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 383.53(b)(1) states that a driver who is convicted of violating an out of service order shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500 for the first conviction and not less than $5,000 for a second or subsequent conviction, in addition to disqualification under CFR 383.51(e). RCW 46.32.100(ii) state that an employer who allows a driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle when there is an out of service order is liable for a penalty of at least $2,750, but not more than $11,000 for each violation. Code of Federal Regulations 383.53(b)(2) states that an employer who is convicted of a violation of CFR 383.37(c) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,750 and not more than $25,000. Our proposed legislation will make state law consistent with the federal regulation. The subject matter expert for this proposal is Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Officer William Balcom and he may be reached at (360) 596-3807.

FISCAL DETAIL - Revenue Only


1. Revenue

State Patrol Highway Account 8,300 8,300 16,600

Total $8,300 $8,300 $16,600



NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? We anticipate that bringing state law in compliance with federal regulations will protect our ability to receive federal grant funding through the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) which currently provides the state with $10,400,000 of funding each biennium. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies in our strategic plan and is directly related to the following WSP goal and priority: Goal 1: Make Washington roadways and ferries safe for the efficient transit of

people and goods. Priority #1.5 Protect the state’s transportation infrastructure through education and

enforcement. Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the safety of people and property. What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? If the state does not come into compliance with the federal regulation, the following are the penalties for non-compliance:

- Withhold five percent of federal-aid highway funds for the first year of non-compliance.

- Withhold ten percent of federal-aid highway funds for the second and subsequent years of non-compliance.

- FMCSA may also decertify the state’s Commercial Drivers License (CDL) program and prohibit the issuance of CDLs. This action is not linked to withholding funds and may be imposed at any time.

What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? There are no other alternatives if we wish to preserve the grant funding currently received. What are the consequences of not funding this package? We are likely to lose partial federal grant funding as stated above.



What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? Our agency request legislation modifies RCWs 46.25.090 and 46.32.100 to bring state law into compliance with the federal regulation. Revenue calculations and assumptions. The Washington State Patrol assumes that only two penalties will be assessed per year for drivers that violate an out of service order and for employers that allow the operation of a commercial motor vehicle when there is an out of service order. The penalty for the driver of a commercial motor vehicle who is convicted of violating the out of service order is increased from $1,100 to $2,500 resulting an increase of $1,400 for a first violation. An employer who allows the operation of a commercial motor vehicle when there is an out of service order is liable for a penalty of at least $2,750. We estimate that penalties charged to the drivers will be $2,800 (1,400 x 2) per year and penalties charged to the employer will be $5,500 ($2,750 x 2) per year for a total of $8,300 in revenue. All penalties recovered for out of service orders will be deposited into the State Patrol Highway Account. Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? This decision package is revenue only. We anticipate the estimated amount for revenue will be ongoing. Revenue calculations and assumptions:


1. Revenue$8,300 $8,300 $16,600

SIX-YEAR REVENUE ESTIMATES:

Transportation 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Revenue 16,600 16,600 16,600

Total 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17

Revenue $16,600 $16,600 $16,600




• •



Decision Package Code/Title: PL-AE Notary Service Fee Increase Budget Period: 2011-13 Budget Budget Level: Policy RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY TEXT This decision package requests an increase in the notary service fee that the Washington State Patrol charges for certain background checks. This fee increase is based on our recently completed Background Check Rate Study. (The funding allocation for this proposal is based on the results of the JLARC cost allocation model approved in the 2010 Supplemental Budget. This proposal must be agreed upon by both the Transportation Committees and the Omnibus Budget Committees to ensure consistent and fair treatment of resources.)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION This decision package requests an increase in the notary service fee. This fee is deposited into the Fingerprint Identification Account, an account which supports the Identification and Criminal History Section. This section was established during the 1972 Legislative Session and is the central repository for criminal history record information (CHRI) for the state of Washington. Criminal history record information is maintained by the section and consists of fingerprint cards and disposition information submitted by law enforcement agencies and courts throughout the state. Positive identification is based upon fingerprints. Criminal history record information is used for many purposes, including:

Criminal justice investigations Public and private employment background checks Licensing background checks Proper sentencing of convicted felons Pre-sentence and post-sentence evaluations

The subject matter expert for this fee increase request is Ms. Heidi Thomsen and she can be reached at (360) 596-4046. The subject matter expert for the background check activities is Ms. Deborah Collinsworth and she may be reached at (360) 534-2102.


1. Operating ExpendituresTotal $0 $0 $0


3. Objects of ExpenditureTotal Objects $0 $0 $0



NARRATIVE JUSTIFICATION AND IMPACT STATEMENT What specific performance outcomes does the agency expect? Approval of this request to increase the notary service fee will result in compliance with RCW 43.43.742 which allows the Washington State Patrol to charge fees related to background check services to recover costs. Performance Measure Detail. No agency performance measures are affected by this request. Is this decision package essential to implement a strategy identified in the agency’s strategic plan? This request supports several strategies in our strategic plan and is directly related to the following WSP goals and priority: Goal #3: Meet the growing need for law enforcement, forensic, investigative, and

other public safety services statewide. Goal #4: Leverage technology to enhance and sustain business processes, public


Does this decision package provide essential support to one of the Governor’s priorities? This request supports the Governor’s priority of Protecting Our Health and Safety. Does this decision package make key contributions to statewide results? Would it rate as a high priority in the Priorities of Government process? This decision package contributes to the following statewide result:

- Improve the Safety of People and Property What are the other important connections or impacts related to this proposal? RCW 43.43.742 provides for the Washington State Patrol to recover its costs related to background check services. It takes approximately 30 minutes for a Correctional Records Technician to process and notarize each criminal history document. Our rate study indicates that, to recover our costs, the fee should be $15. What alternatives were explored by the agency, and why was this alternative chosen? Please see the section below titled “Alternatives to an increase considered”. What are the consequences of not funding this package? Please see the section below titled “Justification for the increase and discussion of consequences of not increasing the tax or fee”.



What is the relationship, if any, to the state’s capital budget? None What changes would be required to existing statutes, rules, or contracts, in order to implement the change? WAC 308-30-020 (What fees may a notary public charge?) will need to be revised. Expenditure and revenue calculations and assumptions. This request is to increase the notary service fee that is charged for notarizing criminal history documents. There is no expenditure impact. Revenue assumptions are based on activity data from the 2007-09 Biennium and the rate that was calculated in our most recent Fingerprint Background Check Rate Study (a copy is available upon request). Which costs and functions are one-time? Which are ongoing? What are the budget impacts in future biennia? There are no expenditures associated with this decision package. Expenditure calculations and assumptions: There are no expenditures associated with this decision package. Justification for New or Increased Tax or Fee Requests: Tax or fee name: Notary Service Current tax or fee amount (FY 2011) Fee FY 2011 Notary Service $5.00

Proposed amount: Fee FY 2012 FY 2013 Notary Service $15.00 $15.00

Incremental change for each year Fee FY 2012 FY 2013 Notary Service $10.00 $0

Expected implementation date: July 1, 2011 Estimated additional revenue generated by increase: Fee FY 2012 FY 2013 Notary Service $29,900 $29,900



Justification for the increase and discussion of consequences of not increasing the tax or fee. Every two years Budget and Fiscal Services staff conduct a rate study for each of the agency's fees. These rate studies determine what the agency should be charging to recover its full costs of providing services. The recently conducted Background Check Rate Study has determined that the notary service fee should be increased. RCW 43.43.742 provides for the Washington State Patrol to recover its costs related to background check services. If this fee is not increased, then we would be in violation of this statute as we would not be collecting fees to cover our full costs of providing this service. Indication of any changes in who pays. None. Indication of any changes in methodology for determining the tax or fee. None If tied to a budget request, Recommendation Summary code for the related expenditure request. Not applicable. Alternatives to an increase considered Since the Background Check Rate Study for the fees is based upon the number of notary service requests and the costs of providing the service, the only alternative to the fee increase is to reduce costs. This would result in not needing a fee increase. This alternative is not possible. Indication of whether the fee increase requires a statutory change, i.e., a separate bill. (If yes, a proposal should be submitted as part of the agency request legislation process.) No statutory changes are required. WAC 308-30-020 (What fees may a notary public charge?) will need to be revised.

State of Washington Summarized Revenue by Account and Source

Budget Period: 2011-13

Supporting Text Excluded

225 - Washington State Patrol

BR - 2011-13 Biennium Request

Dollars in thousands

Agency Level

Biennium TotalsTotalFY2012

Maintenance Level Performance LevelFY2013FY2012 FY2013FY2013FY2012

8/31/2010

10:21AM

BASS - BDS029

001 - General Fund

Total - 0250 - Fireworks Licenses - S 35 30 35 30 65

Total - 0299 - Other Licenses Permi - S 300 300 300 300 600

Total - 0307 - National Drug Cont - F 1,559 1,770 1,559 1,770 3,329

Total - 0316 - Dept of Justice - F 4,643 6,683 4,643 6,683 11,326

Total - 0355 - Fed Rev Non-Assist - F 75 75 75 75 150

Total - 0397 - Homeland Security - F 299 1,150 299 1,150 1,449

Total - 0420 - Charges for Services - S 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 2,500

Total - 0541 - Contributions Grants - P/L 554 1,094 554 1,094 1,648

Total - 0546 - Federal Revenue - P/L 950 309 950 309 1,259

Total - 0597 - Reimburs P/Local Con - P/L 52 67 52 67 119

001 - General Fund - State 1,580 1,585 1,580 3,165 1,585

001 - General Fund - Federal 9,678 6,576 9,678 16,254 6,576

001 - General Fund - Private/Local 1,470 1,556 1,470 3,026 1,556

Total - 001 - General Fund 9,717 12,728 9,717 12,728 22,445

03P - Fire Service Trust

Total - 0250 - Fireworks Licenses - S 73 73 73 73 146

03P - Fire Service Trust - State 73 73 73 146 73

Total - 03P - Fire Service Trust 73 73 73 73 146

081 - WSP Highway Account

Total - 0253 - Motor Vehicle Lic - S 30 30 30 30 60

1 OFMDBALC213.bass_budget_pr

081 - WSP Highway Account

Total - 0299 - Other Licenses Permi - S 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 2,100

Total - 0320 - Dept of Transportatn - F 5,587 4,882 5,587 4,882 10,469

Total - 0397 - Homeland Security - F 236 198 236 198 434

0405 - Fines, Forfeits - S 900 900

8 8 AD - Out of Service Order Penalties

Total - 0405 - Fines, Forfeits - S 900 900 908 908 1,816 8 8

Total - 0420 - Charges for Services - S 260 260 260 260 520

Total - 0421 - Publicatns/Documents - S 244 244 244 244 488

Total - 0541 - Contributions Grants - P/L 916 1,573 916 1,573 2,489

Total - 0546 - Federal Revenue - P/L 200 178 200 178 378

Total - 0597 - Reimburs P/Local Con - P/L 192 310 192 310 502

081 - WSP Highway Account - State 2,484 8 8 2,492 2,492 4,984 2,484

081 - WSP Highway Account - Federal 5,080 5,823 5,080 10,903 5,823

081 - WSP Highway Account - Private/Local 2,061 1,308 2,061 3,369 1,308

Total - 081 - WSP Highway Account 9,615 9,625 8 8 9,623 9,633 19,256

086 - Fire Serv Trng Acct

Total - 0355 - Fed Rev Non-Assist - F 90 90 90 90 180

Total - 0420 - Charges for Services - S 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262 2,524

086 - Fire Serv Trng Acct - State 1,262 1,262 1,262 2,524 1,262

086 - Fire Serv Trng Acct - Federal 90 90 90 180 90

Total - 086 - Fire Serv Trng Acct 1,352 1,352 1,352 1,352 2,704

141 - Federal SeizureAcct

Total - 0316 - Dept of Justice - F 293 293 293 293 586

141 - Federal SeizureAcct - Federal 293 293 293 586 293

Total - 141 - Federal SeizureAcct 293 293 293 293 586

14W - Reduced Cigarette Ig

Total - 0221 - Cigarette Fees/Licns - S 84 84 84 84 168

14W - Reduced Cigarette Ig - State 84 84 84 168 84

Total - 14W - Reduced Cigarette Ig 84 84 84 84 168


210 - Fire Protection Cont

Total - 0299 - Other Licenses Permi - S 548 548 548 548 1,096

210 - Fire Protection Cont - State 548 548 548 1,096 548

Total - 210 - Fire Protection Cont 548 548 548 548 1,096

225 - Fngrprint Id Account

0420 - Charges for Services - S 3,800 3,800

30 30 AE - Notary Service Fee Increase

Total - 0420 - Charges for Services - S 3,800 3,800 3,830 3,830 7,660 30 30

225 - Fngrprint Id Account - State 3,800 30 30 3,830 3,830 7,660 3,800

Total - 225 - Fngrprint Id Account 3,800 3,800 30 30 3,830 3,830 7,660

226 - State Seizure Acct

Total - 0405 - Fines, Forfeits - S 300 300 300 300 600

226 - State Seizure Acct - State 300 300 300 600 300

Total - 226 - State Seizure Acct 300 300 300 300 600

471 - St Patrol N A R Acct

Total - 0621 - Operating Trans In - S 530 529 530 529 1,059

471 - St Patrol N A R Acct - State 529 530 529 1,059 530

Total - 471 - St Patrol N A R Acct 530 529 530 529 1,059

515 - DNA Data Base Acct

Total - 0299 - Other Licenses Permi - S 390 390 390 390 780

515 - DNA Data Base Acct - State 390 390 390 780 390

Total - 515 - DNA Data Base Acct 390 390 390 390 780

225 - Washington State Patrol - State 11,050 38 38 11,094 11,088 22,182 11,056

225 - Washington State Patrol - Federal 15,141 12,782 15,141 27,923 12,782

225 - Washington State Patrol - Private/Local 3,531 2,864 3,531 6,395 2,864

Total - 225 - Washington State Patrol 26,702 29,722 38 38 26,740 29,760 56,500


Washington State Patrol16-Year Transportation Plan

August 28, 2010(Dollars in Thousands) 09-11 11-13 13-15 15-17 17-19 19-21 21-23 23-25 25-27

Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan

State Patrol Highway (081) • Washington State PatrolBeginning Fund Balance - Per Legislative passed budget 11,859 (5,337) (29,786) (55,522) (95,463) (133,465) (188,182) (220,588) (261,235)Minimum fund balance-reserve (3,000) Adjusted Balance S 8,859 (5,337) (29,786) (55,522) (95,463) (133,465) (188,182) (220,588) (261,235)

Motor Veh Lics Permits Fees Distr S 285,848 300,955 311,689 321,287 330,927 341,043 351,278 361,648 372,459 Driver Related Lics Permits Fees Distr S 30,482 31,923 32,727 33,492 34,189 34,822 35,427 35,955 36,488 Terminal Safety Inspection Fees From UTC S 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Breath Test Fees S 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 ACCESS user fees S - - - - - - - - - Collision Records fees S - 488 488 488 488 488 488 488 488 Communications Sites (fees) S 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 Treasury Deposit Earnings S 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 Other Revenue S 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Court DUI cost reimbursement S 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Commercial Vehicle Division Penalties S 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Automated Traffic Camera Safety Revenue S 370 - - - - - - - - Administrative Transfers (081 to 108) S 5,600 6,000 3,000 - - - - - - PL-AD Out of Service Penalties S - 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Federal Funds F 10,903 10,903 11,250 11,688 12,144 12,557 12,972 13,413 13,869 Local Funds L 3,377 3,369 3,436 3,521 3,607 3,685 3,762 3,843 3,926

Total Revenues 343,990 361,065 370,017 377,903 388,782 400,022 411,353 422,773 434,657

Field Operations 010 (WSP) - S 227,958 238,479 249,153 260,152 269,816 278,571 287,356 296,707 306,376 Field Operations 010 (WSP) - F 10,903 10,903 11,250 11,688 12,144 12,557 12,972 13,413 13,869 Field Operations 010 (WSP) - L 867 859 886 921 957 989 1,022 1,057 1,093

Investigative Services 020 (WSP) - S 1,648 1,658 1,684 1,717 1,751 1,780 1,810 1,841 1,872

Technical Services 030 (WSP) - S 108,560 127,335 122,409 124,416 126,655 128,645 130,609 132,667 134,759 Technical Services 030 (WSP) - L 2,510 2,510 2,550 2,600 2,650 2,695 2,740 2,786 2,834

WSP Capital S 3,126 3,770 7,820 16,350 12,810 29,500 7,250 14,950 13,750 Total WSP Expenditures 355,572 385,514 395,753 417,844 426,784 454,738 443,759 463,420 474,551

State employee compensation S 1,877 - - - - - - - -

Dept of Licensing - SHB 1304 S 737 - - - - - - - -

Ending Fund Balance (5,337) (29,786) (55,522) (95,463) (133,465) (188,182) (220,588) (261,235) (301,129) Implicit Price Deflator (provided by Erik Hansen on 8/26/10, OFM) 1.03700 1.0318 1.0390 1.0390 1.0340 1.0330 1.0340 1.0340

Assumptions:1) Licenses, Permits and Fees estimates are based on the June 2010 Transportation Revenue Forecast.2) Expenditures for the 2009-11 Biennium are based on legislative appropriations for the 2009-11 Biennium and the 2010 Supplemental budget.3) Expenditure estimates in the 2011-13 Biennium match carry forward + maintenance and policy level requests. 4) Expenditure estimates in succeeding biennia are based on the amount shown in the 2011-13 Biennium + an increased based on the implicit price deflator per OFM's direction.5) ACCESS fee revenue is to be deposited into the GF for the 2009-11 Biennium. Request legislation for 2011-13 submitted to change this permanently to be deposited into the General Fund.6) Request legislation submitted to change the RCW to have the fees for Collision Records deposited into the State Patrol Highway Account.7) Treasurer's interest is based upon actuals for FY2010 doubled. This assumption is per direction from OFM.8) The Dept. of Licensing is requesting a fund switch between State Patrol Highway Account and Highway Safety Account in the 2011-13 Biennium.

Documentation of the Difference Between WSP's Transportation Plan and the Legislative Passed Transportation Plan for 2011-13 Biennium

Revenue for the 2011-13 BienniumTransportation Plan Per WSP

Transportation Plan as Enacted in 2010 Legislative Session Difference Explanation

Federal Expenditures 10,903 10,909 (6) Carry forward adjustmentLocal Expenditures 3,369 2,460 909 Carry forward adjustment

Motor Vehicle License, Permit, & Fee Distribution 332,878 333,408 (530)

Legislative plan based on March 2010 forecast. WSP plan based on June forecast.

Treasury Deposit Earnings 430 715 (285)

Per direction from OFM - we are to use FY2010 actuals and double that amount for the biennium estimate.

ACCESS User Fees (proposed legislation) - 1,700 (1,700)Proposed legislation to record revenue to Fund 001 instead of Fund 108 and 081

Court DUI Cost Reimbursement 1,300 1,700 (400)

Legislative plan is capturing Commercial Vehicle penalties in the Breath Test Fees revenue.

Terminal Safety Inspection Fees From UTC 2,500 2,500 - N/ABreath Test Fees 2,100 2,100 - N/AOther Revenue 60 100 (40) This is limousine inspection revenue.

Administrative Transfer from 108 to 081 6,000 5,200 800 $6,000 is what is in OFM's and DOT's version of the transportation plan for 2011-13.

Collision Records Fees (proposed legislation) 488 - 488 Proposed legislation to record revenue to Fund 081 instead of Fund 108.

Communications Sites Fees 520 - 520 Legislative plan is capturing Communications Sites Fees in the ACCESS Fees Revenue.

Commercial Vehicles Penalties 500 - 500

Legislative plan is capturing Commercial Vehicle penalties in the Breath Test Fees revenue.

Out of Service Penalties (proposed legislation) 17 - 17 Proposed legislation to increase penalties.

Total Revenues 361,065 360,792 273

Expenditures for the 2011-13 Biennium

Transportation Plan Per WSP

Transportation Plan as Enacted in 2010 Legislative Session Difference Explanation

Program 010 - Federal Carry Forward Level 10,903 10,909 (6) Carry forward adjustmentProgram 010 - Local Carry Forward Level 859 422 437 Carry forward adjustmentProgram 010 - State Carry Forward Level 231,163 236,351 (5,188) Carry forward adjustmentProgram 020 - State Carry Forward Level 1,658 1,594 64 Carry forward adjustmentProgram 030 - Local Carry Forward Level 2,510 2,038 472 Carry forward adjustmentProgram 030 - State Carry Forward Level 110,856 104,837 6,019 Carry forward adjustment

State Employee Compensation - 1,907 (1,907)

Legislative budget didn't break this out by program. It is broken out by program in carry forward for WSP.

Dept of Licensing Appropriation - 749 (749)DOL is requesting a fund switch between SPHA and Highway Safety Account.

Program 900 - Capital 3,770 2,200 1,570 Capital Budget RequestProgram 010 - State Policy Level Request 7,316 - 7,316 Incremental increases over carry forwardProgram 030 - State Maintenance Level Request 1,172 - 1,172 Incremental increases over carry forwardProgram 030 - State Policy Level Request 15,307 - 15,307 Incremental increases over carry forward

-

Total Expenditures 385,514 361,007 24,507

Expenditure Assumptions:Future biennia expenditures are based upon: 1) 1/2 the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD) for Programs 020 and 030 and the full IPD for Program 010, 2) Future biennia expenditure estimates for decision packages.Expenditure assumptions for SPHA-Federal include: $10,442,000 for Motor Carrier Safety Administration Program (MCSAP) grants. $461,000 from the Department of Homeland Security for the National Explosives Detection Canine TeamExpenditure assumptions for SPHA-Local include: $2,510,000 for communication services to King County $867,000 for Indian tribal gaming impact funds.




Transportation Capital Projects

Project 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27

Minor Works $0.67 million $5.2 million $4.4 million $4.4 million $4.4 million $4.5 million $4.5 million $4.75 million

Regional Water and Sewer System (Shelton Academy) $3.1 million - - - - - - - Shelton Academy Infrastructure Improvements - - $0.75 million - - - - - Wenatchee District HQ Expansion - - $1.75 million - - - - - Olympia Detachment - $2.2 million - - - - - - Walla Walla Detachment - $0.1 million $2.082 million - - - - - Shelton Academy Kitchen/Dining Hall Addition - $0.32 million $5.3 million - - - - - Spokane District HQ Addition/Expansion - - $0.16 million $3.2 million - - - - Marysville HQ Expansion - - - $0.18 million $3.5 million - - - Drive Course at the Shelton Academy - - $1.492 million - - - - - Bellevue District HQ Expansion - - $0.12 million $2.1 million - - - - Tacoma District HQ Expansion - - - $0.25 million

$4.94 million - - -

Shelton Academy EVOC Classroom - - $0.1 million $1.98 million - - - - Shelton Academy, Admin Building - - $0.1 million $0.34 million

$6.84 million - - -

Bremerton Detachment Expansion - - $0.1 million $0.36 million

$7.22 million - -

Firearms Training Center (Shelton Academy) - - - - $0.1 million $0.25 million $4.95 million - Shelton Academy Dormitory - - - - - - - $4.5 million



Project 2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27

Placeholder for Future Projects - - - - $2.5 million $2.5 million $5.5 million $4.5 million

Total $3.77

million $7.82

million $16.35 million

$12.81 million

$29.5 million

$7.25 million

$14.95 million

$13.75 million

State of WashingtonRequest for New or Increased Fees

2011-13 Biennium

Agency # Agency NameFee

Code Name of Fee

Statutory Change

Required?New or

Increased? FY 2012 FY 2013GFS/ Other

OFM Decision

225 Washington State Patrol 0004 Background Check Notary Service No Increased 29,900 29,900 Other

Comments

Incremental Revenue Dollars in Thousands

Based on our recently completed background check rate study, we are requesting to increase the notary service fee from $5 to $15.

1

BASS BDS030 State of Washington

Working Capital Reserve

Budget Period:

Agency:

Version:

2011-13

225 Washington State Patrol

BR 2011-13 Biennium Request

Current Biennium Ensuing Biennium

FUND ADMINISTRATOR AGENCY

ONLY

FUND ADMINISTRATOR AGENCY

ONLY

FUND FUND TITLE

RECOMMENDED ENDING FUND

BALANCE

RECOMMENDED ENDING FUND

BALANCE

08/26/2010

1:12:28PM

Page: 1

Form B9-1

02K Death Investigations Account 1,502,000 1,440,000

03P Fire Service Trust Account 33,000 33,000

081 State Patrol Highway Account 3,000,000 3,000,000

086 Fire Service Training Account 2,309,000 2,175,000

141 Federal Seizure Account 69,000 54,000

14W Reduced Cigarette Ignition Acct. 47,000 43,000

210 Fire Protection Contractor License 370,000 372,000

225 Fingerprint Identification Account 1,742,000 715,000

226 State Seizure Account 186,000 171,000

515 DNA Data Base Account 194,000 97,000

Page

Code Title

AGENCY 225 Washington State Patrol

2011-13 Federal Funding Estimates Summary

DATE August 29, 2010

CFDA NO.* Agency Federal Fiscal

Year State Fiscal

Year State Match

Amounts

Agency TotalFY 2010 12,375,000 11,811,000 703,000FY 2011 14,692,000 14,885,000 1,792,000FY 2012 13,215,000 13,391,000 1,241,000FY 2013 13,617,000 13,617,000 1,264,000

Executive Office of the PresidentOffice of National Drug Control Policy

7.000 Activity Inventory #A011 - Investigative Assistance for Drug EnforcementFY 2010 1,709,000 1,709,000 0FY 2011 1,620,000 1,620,000 0FY 2012 1,559,000 1,559,000 0FY 2013 1,770,000 1,770,000 0

U.S. Department of Justice16.000 DEA Task Forces

Activity Inventory #A011 - Investigative Assistance for Drug EnforcementFY 2010 1,445,000 1,445,000 0FY 2011 4,456,000 4,456,000 0FY 2012 1,400,000 1,400,000 0FY 2013 4,593,000 4,593,000 0

U.S. Department of Justice16.710 Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

Activity Inventory #A009 - Highway Traffic EnforcementFY 2010 18,000 18,000 0FY 2011 74,000 74,000 0FY 2012 0 0 0FY 2013 0 0 0

U.S. Department of JusticeForensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program

16.741 Activity Inventory #A005 - Crime LaboratoryFY 2010 2,862,000 2,862,000 0FY 2011 1,853,000 1,853,000 0FY 2012 3,174,000 3,174,000 0FY 2013 1,852,000 1,852,000 0

U.S. Department of JusticeRecovery Act - Edward Byrne Memorial Competitive Grant Program

16.808 Activity Inventory #A009 - Highway Traffic EnforcementFY 2010 69,000 69,000 0FY 2011 238,000 238,000 0FY 2012 69,000 69,000 0FY 2013 238,000 238,000 0

U.S. Department of Transportation

Page

Code Title


2011-13 Federal Funding Estimates Summary


CFDA NO.* Agency Federal Fiscal

Year State Fiscal

Year State Match

Amounts

20.218 Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Project*Activity Inventory #A004 - Commercial Vehicle Safety EnforcementFY 2010 4,671,000 4,107,000 703,000FY 2011 6,169,000 6,362,000 1,792,000FY 2012 5,412,000 5,588,000 1,241,000FY 2013 4,882,000 4,882,000 1,264,000

Department of Homeland Security97.043 National Fire Academy Course Delivery

Activity Inventory #A013 - Specialized Outreach Fire ServicesFY 2010 299,000 299,000 0FY 2011 83,000 83,000 0FY 2012 299,000 299,000 0FY 2013 83,000 83,000 0

Department of Homeland SecurityPort Security Grant Program

97.056 Activity Inventory #A018 - Homeland SecurityFY 2010 1,069,000 1,069,000 0FY 2011 10,000 10,000 0FY 2012 1,069,000 1,069,000 0FY 2013 10,000 10,000 0

Department of Homeland Security97.072 National Explosives Detection Canine Team Program

Activity Inventory #A018 - Homeland SecurityFY 2010 233,000 233,000 0FY 2011 189,000 189,000 0FY 2012 233,000 233,000 0FY 2013 189,000 189,000 0

Notes:*Several grants are rolled into the Motor Carrier Assistance Project. Only one has a state match.

* Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Page

Code Title


NON-BUDGETED LOCAL FUND SUMMARY


FUND CODE FUND NAME

7/1/09 FUND BALANCE*

6/30/11 ESTIMATED

FUND BALANCE**

2011-13 ESTIMATED REVENUES

2011-13 ESTIMATED

EXPENDITURES***

6/30/13 ESTIMATED

FUND BALANCE

Federal Seizure Account:Purpose: Account established to allow the state to share in the distribution of forfeited assets resulting from joint federal task force investigations. Revenue: The distributions from the sale of forfeited assets resulting from joint federal task force operations are deposited into this account. Statutory authority: RCW 43.88.195

State Seizure Account:Purpose: Account established to allow the state to receive forfeited assets resulting from state investigations.Revenue: The proceeds are realized from the sale of forfeited assets seized under state narcotic and felony seizure laws are deposited into this account.Statutory authority: RCW 43.88.195

* This column must agree with the 6/30/09 CAFR balance.**Per fund balance projection as of August 19, 2010, using through July 31, 2010 AFRS data***Based on carry forwards level for the 2011-13 Biennium

141-6 537,796 86,139 586,000 645,000 27,139

226-6 512,292 337,538 600,000 682,000 255,538

ACT001 - Agency Activity Inventory by Agency Washington State Patrol

Appropriation Period: 2011-13 Activity Version: BR - 2011-13 Biennium Request Sort By: Activity

225 - Washington State Patrol

A001 Aerial Highway Traffic Enforcement

Pilots in the Aviation Section assist troopers in detecting traffic violations from the air and

provides assistance to agency staff and local jurisdictions with drug enforcement and aerial

surveillance. It facilitates the transport of donor organs and blood supplies in medical emergencies.

The section also provides air transportation for the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor.

1



Program 010 - Field Operations Bureau

Biennial Total FY 2013 FY 2012 Account

FTE

15.8 15.8 State 15.8 081-1

001 General Fund

$530,844 $532,294 State $1,063,138 001-1

471 State Patrol Nonappropriated Airplane Revolving Account

$0 $550,000 Non-Appropriated $550,000 471-6

081 State Patrol Highway Account

$1,470,415 $1,448,218 State $2,918,633 081-1

$10,000 $2,365 Federal $12,365 081-2

$1,450,583 $1,480,415 $2,930,998 081 Account Total

Program 030 - Technical Services Bureau


FTE

0.3 0.3 State 0.3 001-1

FTE 3.5 3.5 State 3.5 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

3.9 3.9 3.9 FTE Total

03L County Criminal Justice Assistance Account

$140 $140 State $280 03L-1

02K Death Investigations Account

$2,550 $2,630 State $5,180 02K-1

210 Fire Protection Contractor License Account

$810 $670 Non-Appropriated $1,480 210-6

086 Fire Service Training Account

$1,910 $1,950 State $3,860 086-1

225 Fingerprint Identification Account

$2,990 $1,070 State $4,060 225-1

001 General Fund

$79,550 $82,870 State $162,420 001-1

02V Public Safety and Education Account

$10 $0 State $10 02V-1


$404,300 $367,310 State $771,610 081-1

$13,090 $11,580 Private/Local $24,670 081-7

$378,890 $417,390 $796,280 081 Account Total

2



Improve the safety of people and propertyStatewide Result Area:

Support and enhance highway safetyStatewide Strategy:

Expected Results

Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods by providing aerial

traffic enforcement support and traffic congestion management services.

001628 Average duration of 90 minute closures on the

9-key interstates and state routes

Biennium Period Actual Target

2011-13 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

155Q4

155Q3

155Q2

155Q1

2009-11 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

162 155Q4

173 155Q3

154 155Q2

156 155Q1

Performance Measure Status: Approved

3



001628 - Average duration of 90 minute closures on the 9-key interstates and state routesNumber

152

156

160

164

168

172

176

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

4



000929 Number of aggressive driving contacts resulting

from aerial traffic enforcement.


2011-13 368Q8

212Q7

131Q6

518Q5

368Q4

212Q3

131Q2

518Q1

2009-11 356Q8

264Q7

156Q6

442Q5

527 319Q4

304 250Q3

188 147Q2

741 405Q1

5482007-09 585Q8

465 517Q7

278 393Q6

714 637Q5

583 512Q4

491 452Q3

380 344Q2

679 558Q1


5



000929 - Number of aggressive driving contacts resulting from aerial traffic enforcement.Number

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001016 Number of collisions resulting in fatalities on state

routes and interstates


2011-13 48Q8

48Q7

48Q6

48Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

51 52Q4

40 52Q3

52 52Q2

61 52Q1


6



001016 - Number of collisions resulting in fatalities on state routes and interstatesNumber

40

44

48

52

56

60

64

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001014 Number of fatalities on state routes and interstates


2011-13 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

52Q4

52Q3

52Q2

52Q1

2009-11 54Q8

54Q7

54Q6

54Q5

45 56Q4

42 56Q3

61 56Q2

72 56Q1


7



001014 - Number of fatalities on state routes and interstatesNumber

40

44

48

52

56

60

64

68

72

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001627 Number of over 90-minute incidents on the 9-key

interstate and state routes


2011-13 38Q8

38Q7

38Q6

38Q5

48Q4

48Q3

48Q2

48Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

Q6

Q5

56Q4

61Q3

81Q2

86Q1


8



001627 - Number of over 90-minute incidents on the 9-key interstate and state routesNumber

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001022 Number of serious injuries involving driving under

the influence (DUI)


2011-13 77Q8

77Q7

77Q6

77Q5

78Q4

78Q3

78Q2

78Q1

2009-11 79Q8

79Q7

79Q6

79Q5

80Q4

80Q3

57 80Q2

67 80Q1


9



001022 - Number of serious injuries involving driving under the influence (DUI)Number

56

60

64

68

72

76

80

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001020 Number of serious injuries involving speed


2011-13 85Q8

85Q7

85Q6

85Q5

90Q4

90Q3

90Q2

90Q1

2009-11 96Q8

96Q7

96Q6

96Q5

100Q4

100Q3

83 100Q2

78 100Q1


10



001020 - Number of serious injuries involving speedNumber

76

80

84

88

92

96

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001018 Number of serious injuries occurring on state



2011-13 298Q8

298Q7

298Q6

298Q5

310Q4

310Q3

310Q2

310Q1

2009-11 318Q8

318Q7

318Q6

318Q5

332Q4

332Q3

240 332Q2

303 332Q1


11



001018 - Number of serious injuries occurring on state routes and interstatesNumber

240

260

280

300

320

340

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001024 Percentage of trooper patrol vehicles with laptop

computers/SECTOR


2011-13 70%Q8

70%Q7

70%Q6

70%Q5

70%Q4

70%Q3

70%Q2

70%Q1

2009-11 66%Q8

66%Q7

66%Q6

64%Q5

66.6% 62%Q4

61% 60%Q3

60% 58%Q2

56% 56%Q1


12



001024 - Percentage of trooper patrol vehicles with laptop computers/SECTORPercent

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

13



000938 Reduce the number of commercial-motor-vehicle

caused collisions.


2011-13 178Q8

178Q7

178Q6

178Q5

182Q4

182Q3

182Q2

182Q1

2009-11 186Q8

186Q7

186Q6

186Q5

127 190Q4

114 190Q3

127 190Q2

123 190Q1

1442007-09 193Q8

178 194Q7

136 194Q6

181 194Q5

687 791Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


14



000938 - Reduce the Number of commercial-motor-vehicle-caused collisionsNumber

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

000081 Increase seatbelt compliance rate.


2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

100%Q6

Q5

Q4

Q3

96.4% 100%Q2

0% 0%Q1


15



000081 - Seatbelt compliance ratePercent

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

1

Dec

-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02

Sep-0

2

Dec

-02

Mar

-03

Jun-

03

Sep-0

3

Dec

-03

Mar

-04

Jun-

04

Sep-0

4

Dec

-04

Mar

-05

Jun-

05

Sep-0

5

Dec

-05

Mar

-06

Jun-

06

Sep-0

6

Dec

-06

Mar

-07

Jun-

07

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A002 Agency Administration

The Agency Administration activity includes the Office of the Chief, Government and Media

Relations, the Office of Professional Standards, and Evidence and Records Management. In

addition, this activity includes the staff costs for each bureau director and executive assistant, as

well as centralized photography, word processing, and mail services. This activity represents those

management activities that guide the entire agency in achieving its public safety mission.

16





FTE

6.6 7.5 State 7.1 001-1

FTE 37.2 36.3 State 36.8 081-1

0.2 0.2 Private/Local 0.2 081-7

44.0 44.0 44.0 FTE Total


$330 $330 State $660 03L-1


$5,990 $6,130 State $12,120 02K-1


$2,540 $1,580 Non-Appropriated $4,120 210-6


$4,460 $4,550 State $9,010 086-1


$6,980 $2,500 State $9,480 225-1

001 General Fund

$902,537 $719,219 State $1,621,756 001-1


$20 $0 State $20 02V-1


$3,437,804 $3,614,918 State $7,052,722 081-1

$5,950 $3,680 Private/Local $9,630 081-7

$3,618,598 $3,443,754 $7,062,352 081 Account Total



Expected Results

17



Provide management services and administrative support to:

1. Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods.

2. Enhance fire safety and emergency response in the state of Washington.

3. Leverage technology to improve business processes, systems, and statewide emergency

communications interoperability.

4. Provide critical tools and resources to foster an innovative, knowledgeable, and diverse

workforce.

5. Improve core business processes and systems for increased accountability of public safety

programs.

6. Expand the agency’s ability to meet the need for vital forensic and criminal justice services

statewide.

001031 Increase the score of both state and local agency

interoperability


2011-13 5Q8

4.8Q7

4.7Q6

4.6Q5

4.5Q4

4.4Q3

4.2Q2

4Q1

2009-11 4Q8

3.8Q7

3.8Q6

3.8Q5

3.8 3.6Q4

3.8 3.6Q3

3.8 3.5Q2

3.4 3.5Q1


18



001031 - Increase the score of both state and local agency interoperabilityNumber

3.4

3.6

3.8

4.0

4.2

4.4

4.6

4.8

5.0

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

19



000944 Number of facilities provided training on disaster

evacuation processes


2011-13 9Q8

9Q7

9Q6

9Q5

9Q4

9Q3

9Q2

9Q1

2009-11 6Q8

6Q7

6Q6

6Q5

28 6Q4

4 6Q3

1 6Q2

2 6Q1

02007-09 18Q8

9 18Q7

6 18Q6

20 18Q5

42 72Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


20



000944 - Number of facilities provided training on disaster evacuation processesNumber

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001028 Percent of staff trained in the COOP Plan


2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 100%Q8

80%Q7

60%Q6

40%Q5

2% 20%Q4

2% 15%Q3

2% 10%Q2

2% 5%Q1


21



001028 - Percent of staff trained in the COOP PlanPercent

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A003 Collision Records

The Collision Records Section is the repository for statewide officer and civilian collision reports,

compiling statistical data for the Washington State departments of Transportation and Licensing.

The section provides copies of the Police Traffic Collision Report and the Vehicle Collision

Report to eligible persons, upon application and submission of a non-refundable fee to process the

application.



FTE

12.3 12.3 State 12.3 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

001 General Fund

$5,620 $5,710 State $11,330 001-1


$880,304 $863,540 State $1,743,844 081-1



Expected Results

Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods by collecting

collision record information and providing data necessary to analyze crash factors.

22






2011-13 48Q8

48Q7

48Q6

48Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

51 52Q4

40 52Q3

52 52Q2

61 52Q1



40

44

48

52

56

60

64

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

23





2011-13 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

52Q4

52Q3

52Q2

52Q1

2009-11 54Q8

54Q7

54Q6

54Q5

45 56Q4

42 56Q3

61 56Q2

72 56Q1



40

44

48

52

56

60

64

68

72

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A004 Commercial Vehicle Safety Enforcement

24



This activity includes the Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Section, Motor Carrier Safety

Assistance and New Entrants Programs, School Bus Inspection Program, Compliance and Review

Section, Tow Truck Inspection Unit, and Equipment and Standards Review. These programs

promote the safe travel of commercial vehicles and school buses on Washington State highways

through education, technical assistance, and enforcement activities.

25





FTE

0.4 0.4 State 0.4 09M-1

FTE 2.0 1.5 State 1.8 001-1

FTE 223.4 223.9 State 223.7 081-1

43.6 43.6 Federal 43.6 081-2

269.4 269.4 269.4 FTE Total

09M Aquatic Invasive Species Enforcement Account

$27,000 $27,000 State $54,000 09M-1


$17,299,350 $17,152,838 State $34,452,188 081-1

$4,821,993 $5,587,000 Federal $10,408,993 081-2

$22,739,838 $22,121,343 $44,861,181 081 Account Total



FTE

10.9 15.0 State 13.0 001-1

0.2 0.2 Private/Local 0.2 001-7

FTE 55.3 55.6 State 55.5 081-1

1.7 1.7 Private/Local 1.7 081-7

70.3 72.5 68.1 FTE Total


$2,310 $2,310 State $4,620 03L-1


$27,900 $26,780 State $54,680 02K-1




$25,430 $25,430 State $50,860 086-1


$55,330 $16,150 State $71,480 225-1

001 General Fund

$1,322,007 $1,390,608 State $2,712,615 001-1


$140 $0 State $140 02V-1


$6,252,833 $6,059,532 State $12,312,365 081-1

26





$215,950 $191,120 Private/Local $407,070 081-7

$6,250,652 $6,468,783 $12,719,435 081 Account Total



Expected Results

Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods by providing

educational and enforcement programs to ensure compliance with commercial motor vehicle

regulations.




2011-13 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

155Q4

155Q3

155Q2

155Q1

2009-11 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

162 155Q4

173 155Q3

154 155Q2

156 155Q1


27




152

156

160

164

168

172

176

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

28






2011-13 368Q8

212Q7

131Q6

518Q5

368Q4

212Q3

131Q2

518Q1

2009-11 356Q8

264Q7

156Q6

442Q5

527 319Q4

304 250Q3

188 147Q2

741 405Q1

5482007-09 585Q8

465 517Q7

278 393Q6

714 637Q5

583 512Q4

491 452Q3

380 344Q2

679 558Q1


29




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 48Q8

48Q7

48Q6

48Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

51 52Q4

40 52Q3

52 52Q2

61 52Q1


30




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

52Q4

52Q3

52Q2

52Q1

2009-11 54Q8

54Q7

54Q6

54Q5

45 56Q4

42 56Q3

61 56Q2

72 56Q1


31




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

68

72

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 38Q8

38Q7

38Q6

38Q5

48Q4

48Q3

48Q2

48Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

Q6

Q5

56Q4

61Q3

81Q2

86Q1


32




30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


the influence (DUI)


2011-13 77Q8

77Q7

77Q6

77Q5

78Q4

78Q3

78Q2

78Q1

2009-11 79Q8

79Q7

79Q6

79Q5

80Q4

80Q3

57 80Q2

67 80Q1


33




56

60

64

68

72

76

80

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 85Q8

85Q7

85Q6

85Q5

90Q4

90Q3

90Q2

90Q1

2009-11 96Q8

96Q7

96Q6

96Q5

100Q4

100Q3

83 100Q2

78 100Q1


34




76

80

84

88

92

96

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 298Q8

298Q7

298Q6

298Q5

310Q4

310Q3

310Q2

310Q1

2009-11 318Q8

318Q7

318Q6

318Q5

332Q4

332Q3

240 332Q2

303 332Q1


35




240

260

280

300

320

340

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


computers/SECTOR


2011-13 70%Q8

70%Q7

70%Q6

70%Q5

70%Q4

70%Q3

70%Q2

70%Q1

2009-11 66%Q8

66%Q7

66%Q6

64%Q5

66.6% 62%Q4

61% 60%Q3

60% 58%Q2

56% 56%Q1


36




56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

37




caused collisions.


2011-13 178Q8

178Q7

178Q6

178Q5

182Q4

182Q3

182Q2

182Q1

2009-11 186Q8

186Q7

186Q6

186Q5

127 190Q4

114 190Q3

127 190Q2

123 190Q1

1442007-09 193Q8

178 194Q7

136 194Q6

181 194Q5

687 791Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


38




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

100%Q6

Q5

Q4

Q3

96.4% 100%Q2

0% 0%Q1


39




0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

1

Dec

-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02

Sep-0

2

Dec

-02

Mar

-03

Jun-

03

Sep-0

3

Dec

-03

Mar

-04

Jun-

04

Sep-0

4

Dec

-04

Mar

-05

Jun-

05

Sep-0

5

Dec

-05

Mar

-06

Jun-

06

Sep-0

6

Dec

-06

Mar

-07

Jun-

07

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A005 Crime Laboratory

The Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division operates full-service crime laboratories in

Seattle, Tacoma, Marysville, and Spokane, and limited-service crime laboratories in Kelso,

Kennewick, and Tumwater. The laboratories provide forensic services for criminal justice

agencies within the state and are accredited through the American Society of Crime Laboratory

Directors (ASCLD). Forensic laboratory services include biochemistry of body fluids;

examination of firearms/toolmarks; microanalysis of trace evidence; analysis of physical evidence;

chemical analysis of evidence and controlled substances; examination of questioned documents;

latent fingerprint identification; crime scene assistance; clandestine laboratory assistance; and

training for criminal justice agencies.

40



Program 020 - Investigative Services Bureau


FTE

5.8 26.7 State 16.3 03L-1

FTE 1.5 0.0 State 0.8 02K-1

FTE 2.0 2.0 Non-Appropriated 2.0 515-6

FTE 140.2 119.7 State 130.0 001-1

1.2 1.2 Federal 1.2 001-2

FTE 7.0 8.1 State 7.6 03M-1

157.7 157.7 157.7 FTE Total


$1,503,686 $1,397,294 State $2,900,980 03L-1


$88,500 $417,790 State $506,290 02K-1

515 DNA Data Base Account

$734,000 $429,000 Non-Appropriated $1,163,000 515-6

141 Federal Seizure Account


001 General Fund

$13,729,720 $15,223,775 State $28,953,495 001-1

$1,852,407 $3,174,215 Federal $5,026,622 001-2

$372,880 $207,520 Private/Local $580,400 001-7

$18,605,510 $15,955,007 $34,560,517 001 Account Total

03M Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account

$655,000 $650,600 State $1,305,600 03M-1



FTE

6.1 6.1 State 6.1 001-1

FTE 16.3 16.7 State 16.5 081-1

1.0 1.0 Private/Local 1.0 081-7

23.6 23.8 23.4 FTE Total


$1,340 $1,340 State $2,680 03L-1


$28,660 $21,270 State $49,930 02K-1

03F Enhanced 911 Account

$16,000 $(16,000)State $0 03F-1

41








$18,390 $18,760 State $37,150 086-1


$28,750 $10,300 State $39,050 225-1

001 General Fund

$736,623 $886,549 State $1,623,172 001-1


$(920)$0 State $(920)02V-1


$2,887,157 $2,624,571 State $5,511,728 081-1

$24,520 $15,160 Private/Local $39,680 081-7

$2,639,731 $2,911,677 $5,551,408 081 Account Total


Support crime investigationStatewide Strategy:

Expected Results

Expand the agency’s ability to meet the need for vital forensic and criminal justice services

statewide by providing scientific analysis of any physical evidence relating to crimes against the

citizens of the state and performing DNA typing of persons convicted of violent or sexual offenses.

42



000956 Median age in days of toxicology casework

turnaround time


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

21 20Q4

21 15Q3

18 15Q2

17 15Q1

162007-09 15Q8

17 15Q7

17 15Q6

16 15Q5

15 15Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


43



000956 - Median age in days of toxicology casework turnaround timeNumber

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A006 Criminal Records Management

This activity includes the management and operation of the statewide law enforcement

telecommunications system, A Central Computerized Enforcement Service System (ACCESS),

and the Washington Crime Information Center (WACIC). ACCESS provides telecommunications

linkage to law enforcement, criminal justice agencies, and associated state databases. It allows

contact with agencies nationwide through the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications

System and access to National Crime Information Center files. The WACIC is a computerized

database of stolen property, wanted persons, missing persons, and other information of interest to

law enforcement officers and criminal justice agencies throughout the state. The Identification and

Criminal History Section is the repository for statewide fingerprint-based criminal history record

information and sex/kidnapping offender registration. The Missing and Unidentified Persons Unit

maintains dental data and other descriptive data on persons reported missing for longer than 30

days and unidentified human remains. Other services include technical fingerprint assistance and

help in identifying unknown persons.

44





FTE

52.3 54.6 State 53.5 225-1

FTE 34.4 35.5 State 35.0 001-1

FTE 2.8 1.7 State 2.3 081-1

90.7 91.8 89.5 FTE Total


$4,465,023 $4,642,499 State $9,107,522 225-1

001 General Fund

$4,437,169 $4,407,045 State $8,844,214 001-1


$41,123 $53,188 State $94,311 081-1



FTE

6.6 6.7 State 6.7 001-1

FTE 9.9 9.9 State 9.9 081-1

0.6 0.6 Private/Local 0.6 081-7

17.2 17.2 17.1 FTE Total


$790 $790 State $1,580 03L-1


$14,430 $14,800 State $29,230 02K-1




$10,780 $10,990 State $21,770 086-1


$5,340 $3,030 State $8,370 225-1

001 General Fund

$726,460 $771,675 State $1,498,135 001-1


$(950)$0 State $(950)02V-1


$1,806,155 $1,540,375 State $3,346,530 081-1

$14,370 $8,880 Private/Local $23,250 081-7

$1,549,255 $1,820,525 $3,369,780 081 Account Total

45





Expected Results


statewide by making available complete, accurate, and timely information on persons required by

statute to have background checks, suspects and offenders, and missing/unidentified persons.

001038 10% or more of all narcotic cases will involve the

arrests of 5 or more defendants.


2011-13 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

10Q4

10Q3

10Q2

10Q1

2009-11 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

12 10Q4

15 10Q3

11 10Q2

13 10Q1


46



001038 - 10% or more of all narcotic cases will involve the arrests of 5 or more defendants.Number

10

11

12

13

14

15

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001036 Number of cases referred


2011-13 12Q8

12Q7

12Q6

12Q5

12Q4

12Q3

12Q2

12Q1

2009-11 5Q8

5Q7

5Q6

5Q5

8 5Q4

9 5Q3

12 5Q2

20 5Q1


47



001036 - Number of cases referredNumber

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

48



000958 Number of days citizens wait for vehicle

inspections


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20 20Q4

13 20Q3

14 20Q2

16 20Q1

14.282007-09 20Q8

9.64 20Q7

10 20Q6

15 20Q5

22 20Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


49



000958 - Number of days citizens wait for vehicle inspectionsNumber

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001035 Number of joint investigations


2011-13 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

113 5Q4

132 5Q3

103 5Q2

52 5Q1


50



001035 - Number of joint investigationsNumber

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

51



000957 Number of vehicles stolen in Washington State


2011-13 5,000Q8

5,172Q7

5,539Q6

5,670Q5

5,334Q4

5,539Q3

6,047Q2

6,049Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

5,059Q6

4,827Q5

5,940 4,528Q4

5,859 5,137Q3

5,325 5,705Q2

5,128 6,298Q1

4,7662007-09 8,356Q8

4,859 8,356Q7

5,604 8,357Q6

6,175 8,357Q5

26,913 35,186Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


52



000957 - Number of vehicles stolen in Washington StateNumber

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

28,000

32,000

36,000

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A007 Executive Protection

This activity provides security for the Governor, the Governor's family, and the Lieutenant

Governor. Executive Protection personnel also provide law enforcement and visitor security

services at the Capitol Campus and the Department of Labor and Industries.

53





FTE

37.7 37.7 State 37.7 001-1

FTE 8.6 8.6 State 8.6 081-1

0.3 0.3 Private/Local 0.3 081-7

46.6 46.6 46.6 FTE Total


$360 $360 State $720 03L-1


$6,560 $6,740 State $13,300 02K-1




$4,910 $5,000 State $9,910 086-1


$7,670 $2,750 State $10,420 225-1

001 General Fund

$2,177,990 $2,281,116 State $4,459,106 001-1


$20 $0 State $20 02V-1


$1,183,766 $996,254 State $2,180,020 081-1

$33,560 $29,690 Private/Local $63,250 081-7

$1,025,944 $1,217,326 $2,243,270 081 Account Total


Enforce the lawStatewide Strategy:

Expected Results

Enhance emergency response in the state of Washington by providing protection to the Governor,

the Governor's family, and the Lieutenant Governor, along with security services at the Governor’s

mansion and Capitol Campus.

A008 Fire Protection Services

54



This activity includes administration of the Fire Protection Bureau and the All Risk Mobilization

program. Per statute, the Fire Protection Bureau has the critical responsibility to prevent the loss of

life and property for the citizens across the state. Primary activities include providing critical

response resources to local jurisdictions facing extraordinary emergency incidents such as wildland

fires; developing, managing and updating the Mobilization Plan (Plan); and implementing the Plan

during large scale emergencies. Implementing the Plan includes receiving, reviewing and

authorizing requests for mobilization, coordinating the dispatch of resources, tracking the use of

resources for payments, making the payments, and auditing the payments to ensure all funds were

used appropriately. Plan implementation also requires selected personnel to be available 24 hours a

day, seven days a week.

55





FTE

1.0 0.0 Non-Appropriated 0.5 210-6

FTE 0.2 0.2 State 0.2 086-1

FTE 8.2 8.2 State 8.2 001-1

0.9 0.0 Federal 0.5 001-2

9.4 8.4 10.3 FTE Total

05H Disaster Response Account

$4,000,000 $4,000,000 State $8,000,000 05H-1


$484,229 $313,851 State $798,080 086-1

001 General Fund

$509,089 $691,164 State $1,200,253 001-1



FTE

0.6 0.6 State 0.6 001-1

FTE 0.7 0.7 State 0.7 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

1.4 1.4 1.4 FTE Total


$70 $70 State $140 03L-1


$1,200 $1,290 State $2,490 02K-1


$0 $10,880 Non-Appropriated $10,880 210-6


$1,470 $530 State $2,000 225-1

001 General Fund

$46,765 $53,720 State $100,485 001-1


$147,550 $134,690 State $282,240 081-1

$1,250 $770 Private/Local $2,020 081-7

$135,460 $148,800 $284,260 081 Account Total


Prevent accidentsStatewide Strategy:

56



Expected Results

Enhance fire safety and emergency response in the state of Washington by providing educational

and enforcement programs to ensure compliance with fire safety standards and regulations.

001799 All-Risk Mobilization is typically a seasonal activity

that occurs during the summer months in response to

wildland fires and would likely not have any reported data

for the months indicated.


2011-13 0%Q8

0%Q7

0%Q6

66%Q5

0%Q4

0%Q3

0%Q2

66%Q1


001799 - Percentage of Type 3 team initial deployments to State All-Risk MobilizationsPercent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A009 Highway Traffic Enforcement and Emergency Operations

Highway Traffic Enforcement includes field force commissioned officers who patrol state

highways in eight districts across Washington State. Troopers are responsible for enforcing traffic

laws, investigating collisions, assisting motorists, and providing a safe motoring environment on

over 17,500 miles of state highway. This activity also includes oversight of the Aviation Section,

Canine Unit, Explosives Unit and the Washington State Patrol Honor Guard.

57





FTE

4.0 15.9 State 10.0 001-1

FTE 996.1 1,039.2 State 1,017.7 081-1

1,027.6 1,055.1 1,000.1 FTE Total

001 General Fund

$894,006 $907,330 State $1,801,336 001-1

$238,231 $68,769 Federal Stimulus $307,000 001-8

$976,099 $1,132,237 $2,108,336 001 Account Total

04V Vehicle License Fraud Account

$218,000 $221,000 State $439,000 04V-1


$88,315,492 $79,363,197 State $167,678,689 081-1

$60,142 $0 Federal $60,142 081-2

$406,842 $56,020 Private/Local $462,862 081-7

$79,419,217 $88,782,476 $168,201,693 081 Account Total



FTE

34.3 30.5 State 32.4 001-1

0.1 0.9 Federal 0.5 001-2

1.6 1.6 Private/Local 1.6 001-7

FTE 219.4 227.9 State 223.7 081-1

1.7 0.0 Federal 0.9 081-2

6.6 6.6 Private/Local 6.6 081-7

265.6 267.5 263.7 FTE Total


$8,630 $8,630 State $17,260 03L-1


$85,720 $85,315 State $171,035 02K-1


$95,240 $95,240 State $190,480 086-1


$180,158 $60,490 State $240,648 225-1

001 General Fund

$4,154,581 $4,644,501 State $8,799,082 001-1


$1,500 $0 State $1,500 02V-1

58






$39,575,693 $39,161,484 State $78,737,177 081-1

$945,410 $579,250 Private/Local $1,524,660 081-7

$39,740,734 $40,521,103 $80,261,837 081 Account Total



Expected Results

Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods by vigorously

enforcing traffic laws, investigating collisions, and assisting motorists. Particular enforcement

emphasis is placed on drinking drivers, aggressive drivers, those who travel at dangerous speeds,

and people not wearing safety belts.




2011-13 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

155Q4

155Q3

155Q2

155Q1

2009-11 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

162 155Q4

173 155Q3

154 155Q2

156 155Q1


59




152

156

160

164

168

172

176

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

60






2011-13 368Q8

212Q7

131Q6

518Q5

368Q4

212Q3

131Q2

518Q1

2009-11 356Q8

264Q7

156Q6

442Q5

527 319Q4

304 250Q3

188 147Q2

741 405Q1

5482007-09 585Q8

465 517Q7

278 393Q6

714 637Q5

583 512Q4

491 452Q3

380 344Q2

679 558Q1


61




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 48Q8

48Q7

48Q6

48Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

51 52Q4

40 52Q3

52 52Q2

61 52Q1


62




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

52Q4

52Q3

52Q2

52Q1

2009-11 54Q8

54Q7

54Q6

54Q5

45 56Q4

42 56Q3

61 56Q2

72 56Q1


63




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

68

72

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 38Q8

38Q7

38Q6

38Q5

48Q4

48Q3

48Q2

48Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

Q6

Q5

56Q4

61Q3

81Q2

86Q1


64




30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


the influence (DUI)


2011-13 77Q8

77Q7

77Q6

77Q5

78Q4

78Q3

78Q2

78Q1

2009-11 79Q8

79Q7

79Q6

79Q5

80Q4

80Q3

57 80Q2

67 80Q1


65




56

60

64

68

72

76

80

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 85Q8

85Q7

85Q6

85Q5

90Q4

90Q3

90Q2

90Q1

2009-11 96Q8

96Q7

96Q6

96Q5

100Q4

100Q3

83 100Q2

78 100Q1


66




76

80

84

88

92

96

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 298Q8

298Q7

298Q6

298Q5

310Q4

310Q3

310Q2

310Q1

2009-11 318Q8

318Q7

318Q6

318Q5

332Q4

332Q3

240 332Q2

303 332Q1


67




240

260

280

300

320

340

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001037 Percentage of eligible patrol vehicles with in-car

digital video units


2011-13 15%Q8

15%Q7

15%Q6

15%Q5

15%Q4

15%Q3

15%Q2

15%Q1

2009-11 13%Q8

13%Q7

13%Q6

13%Q5

15% 13%Q4

15% 13%Q3

15% 13%Q2

13% 13%Q1


68



001037 - Percentage of eligible patrol vehicles with in-car digital video unitsPercent

12.8

13.2

13.6

14.0

14.4

14.8

15.2

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


computers/SECTOR


2011-13 70%Q8

70%Q7

70%Q6

70%Q5

70%Q4

70%Q3

70%Q2

70%Q1

2009-11 66%Q8

66%Q7

66%Q6

64%Q5

66.6% 62%Q4

61% 60%Q3

60% 58%Q2

56% 56%Q1


69




56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

70




caused collisions.


2011-13 178Q8

178Q7

178Q6

178Q5

182Q4

182Q3

182Q2

182Q1

2009-11 186Q8

186Q7

186Q6

186Q5

127 190Q4

114 190Q3

127 190Q2

123 190Q1

1442007-09 193Q8

178 194Q7

136 194Q6

181 194Q5

687 791Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


71




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

100%Q6

Q5

Q4

Q3

96.4% 100%Q2

0% 0%Q1


72




0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

1

Dec

-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02

Sep-0

2

Dec

-02

Mar

-03

Jun-

03

Sep-0

3

Dec

-03

Mar

-04

Jun-

04

Sep-0

4

Dec

-04

Mar

-05

Jun-

05

Sep-0

5

Dec

-05

Mar

-06

Jun-

06

Sep-0

6

Dec

-06

Mar

-07

Jun-

07

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A010 Impaired Driving

The Implied Consent activity includes the Breath Test and Drug Evaluation and Classification

Programs of the Washington State Patrol. The Breath Test Program manages and maintains all

evidentiary breath-testing instruments in the state and provides all re-certification training. The

section provides statistical data and analysis related to driving under the influence (DUI)

enforcement to and provides expert witness testimony on the breath alcohol testing program. Drug

recognition experts in the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program are trained to recognize the

symptoms of intoxication for seven different categories of drugs, using a 12-step standardized

process to identify drug impairment. The State Patrol provides specialized training in these skills

to troopers and officers from local law enforcement agencies.

73





FTE

20.8 20.8 State 20.8 081-1


$1,703,533 $1,716,104 State $3,419,637 081-1

$0 $18,138 Private/Local $18,138 081-7

$1,734,242 $1,703,533 $3,437,775 081 Account Total



FTE

1.0 1.0 State 1.0 001-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 001-7

FTE 4.0 4.0 State 4.0 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

5.2 5.2 5.2 FTE Total


$180 $180 State $360 03L-1


$3,270 $3,350 State $6,620 02K-1


$1,930 $870 Non-Appropriated $2,800 210-6


$2,450 $2,490 State $4,940 086-1


$3,820 $1,370 State $5,190 225-1

001 General Fund

$95,360 $105,546 State $200,906 001-1


$10 $0 State $10 02V-1


$518,575 $470,534 State $989,109 081-1

$16,690 $14,780 Private/Local $31,470 081-7

$485,314 $535,265 $1,020,579 081 Account Total



74



Expected Results


necessary resources to the criminal justice community to identify and convict persons who drive

under the influence of drugs and alcohol.




2011-13 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

155Q4

155Q3

155Q2

155Q1

2009-11 155Q8

155Q7

155Q6

155Q5

162 155Q4

173 155Q3

154 155Q2

156 155Q1



152

156

160

164

168

172

176

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

75






2011-13 368Q8

212Q7

131Q6

518Q5

368Q4

212Q3

131Q2

518Q1

2009-11 356Q8

264Q7

156Q6

442Q5

527 319Q4

304 250Q3

188 147Q2

741 405Q1

5482007-09 585Q8

465 517Q7

278 393Q6

714 637Q5

583 512Q4

491 452Q3

380 344Q2

679 558Q1


76




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 48Q8

48Q7

48Q6

48Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

51 52Q4

40 52Q3

52 52Q2

61 52Q1


77




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 49Q8

49Q7

49Q6

49Q5

52Q4

52Q3

52Q2

52Q1

2009-11 54Q8

54Q7

54Q6

54Q5

45 56Q4

42 56Q3

61 56Q2

72 56Q1


78




40

44

48

52

56

60

64

68

72

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 38Q8

38Q7

38Q6

38Q5

48Q4

48Q3

48Q2

48Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

Q6

Q5

56Q4

61Q3

81Q2

86Q1


79




30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


the influence (DUI)


2011-13 77Q8

77Q7

77Q6

77Q5

78Q4

78Q3

78Q2

78Q1

2009-11 79Q8

79Q7

79Q6

79Q5

80Q4

80Q3

57 80Q2

67 80Q1


80




56

60

64

68

72

76

80

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 85Q8

85Q7

85Q6

85Q5

90Q4

90Q3

90Q2

90Q1

2009-11 96Q8

96Q7

96Q6

96Q5

100Q4

100Q3

83 100Q2

78 100Q1


81




76

80

84

88

92

96

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual




2011-13 298Q8

298Q7

298Q6

298Q5

310Q4

310Q3

310Q2

310Q1

2009-11 318Q8

318Q7

318Q6

318Q5

332Q4

332Q3

240 332Q2

303 332Q1


82




240

260

280

300

320

340

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual


computers/SECTOR


2011-13 70%Q8

70%Q7

70%Q6

70%Q5

70%Q4

70%Q3

70%Q2

70%Q1

2009-11 66%Q8

66%Q7

66%Q6

64%Q5

66.6% 62%Q4

61% 60%Q3

60% 58%Q2

56% 56%Q1


83




56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

84




caused collisions.


2011-13 178Q8

178Q7

178Q6

178Q5

182Q4

182Q3

182Q2

182Q1

2009-11 186Q8

186Q7

186Q6

186Q5

127 190Q4

114 190Q3

127 190Q2

123 190Q1

1442007-09 193Q8

178 194Q7

136 194Q6

181 194Q5

687 791Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


85




100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

100%Q6

Q5

Q4

Q3

96.4% 100%Q2

0% 0%Q1


86




0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

1

Dec

-01

Mar

-02

Jun-

02

Sep-0

2

Dec

-02

Mar

-03

Jun-

03

Sep-0

3

Dec

-03

Mar

-04

Jun-

04

Sep-0

4

Dec

-04

Mar

-05

Jun-

05

Sep-0

5

Dec

-05

Mar

-06

Jun-

06

Sep-0

6

Dec

-06

Mar

-07

Jun-

07

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A011 Investigative Assistance for Criminal Enforcement

The Investigative Assistance Division provides investigative coordination, support, and training

that fosters a collaborative response to criminal activity in Washington State. The Narcotics

Section provides ongoing drug investigation training for the Washington State Criminal Justice

Training Commission and local clandestine laboratory teams, monitoring the progress of

federally-funded task forces throughout the state. The Special Weapons and Tactics Team

(SWAT) responds to tactical incidents and clandestine drug labs with highly trained personnel who

execute search warrants, arrest suspects, and process evidence for criminal prosecution. The

Criminal Intelligence Unit (CIU) provides assistance to criminal justice agencies with complex

criminal investigations, as well as training to troopers, sergeants, and local law enforcement

agencies on gang enforcement and trends. The Computer Forensics Unit provides technical

support and training to criminal justice agencies, and recovers relevant evidence that may exist on

computer hard drives and other storage media for use in related criminal and internal

investigations.

87





FTE

49.5 37.5 State 43.5 001-1

18.2 18.2 Federal 18.2 001-2

3.0 15.0 Private/Local 9.0 001-7

05H Disaster Response Account

$1,000 $1,000 State $2,000 05H-1

141 Federal Seizure Account

$300,899 $(899)Non-Appropriated $300,000 141-6

001 General Fund

$3,877,136 $4,317,590 State $8,194,726 001-1

$6,363,049 $2,959,088 Federal $9,322,137 001-2

$532,444 $1,258,357 Private/Local $1,790,801 001-7

$8,535,035 $10,772,629 $19,307,664 001 Account Total

226 State Seizure Account




FTE

3.1 3.1 State 3.1 001-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 001-7

FTE 15.4 15.5 State 15.5 081-1

0.5 0.5 Private/Local 0.5 081-7

19.2 19.2 19.1 FTE Total


$650 $650 State $1,300 03L-1


$11,870 $12,210 State $24,080 02K-1




$8,890 $9,050 State $17,940 086-1


$13,890 $4,970 State $18,860 225-1

001 General Fund

$345,680 $381,480 State $727,160 001-1


88





$40 $0 State $40 02V-1


$1,879,915 $1,700,325 State $3,580,240 081-1

$60,780 $53,780 Private/Local $114,560 081-7

$1,754,105 $1,940,695 $3,694,800 081 Account Total



Expected Results


statewide by providing investigative services, technical support, and training to the Washington

State Patrol, law enforcement agencies, other agencies, and community groups.




2011-13 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

10Q4

10Q3

10Q2

10Q1

2009-11 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

12 10Q4

15 10Q3

11 10Q2

13 10Q1


89




10

11

12

13

14

15

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 12Q8

12Q7

12Q6

12Q5

12Q4

12Q3

12Q2

12Q1

2009-11 5Q8

5Q7

5Q6

5Q5

8 5Q4

9 5Q3

12 5Q2

20 5Q1


90




4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

91




inspections


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20 20Q4

13 20Q3

14 20Q2

16 20Q1

14.282007-09 20Q8

9.64 20Q7

10 20Q6

15 20Q5

22 20Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


92




8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

113 5Q4

132 5Q3

103 5Q2

52 5Q1


93




0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

94





2011-13 5,000Q8

5,172Q7

5,539Q6

5,670Q5

5,334Q4

5,539Q3

6,047Q2

6,049Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

5,059Q6

4,827Q5

5,940 4,528Q4

5,859 5,137Q3

5,325 5,705Q2

5,128 6,298Q1

4,7662007-09 8,356Q8

4,859 8,356Q7

5,604 8,357Q6

6,175 8,357Q5

26,913 35,186Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


95




4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

28,000

32,000

36,000

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A012 Missing Children Recovery

This activity includes the management and operation of the Missing and Exploited Children Task

Force, a multi-agency task force that assists law enforcement, state and federal agencies, and

custodial parents or guardians by conducting investigations on missing, abducted, and exploited

children through referrals, on-site assistance, case management, and training. The Missing

Children Clearinghouse coordinates the exchange of information among law enforcement agencies,

citizens, schools, the Department of Social and Health Services, and other interested groups

regarding the location and return of missing children.

96





FTE

10.0 10.0 State 10.0 001-1

001 General Fund

$1,109,651 $964,100 State $2,073,751 001-1



FTE

0.3 0.3 State 0.3 001-1

FTE 1.1 1.1 State 1.1 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

1.5 1.5 1.5 FTE Total


$90 $90 State $180 03L-1


$1,580 $1,620 State $3,200 02K-1


$930 $420 Non-Appropriated $1,350 210-6


$1,180 $1,200 State $2,380 086-1


$1,840 $660 State $2,500 225-1

001 General Fund

$31,540 $23,660 State $55,200 001-1


$10 $0 State $10 02V-1


$184,120 $167,360 State $351,480 081-1

$1,560 $970 Private/Local $2,530 081-7

$168,330 $185,680 $354,010 081 Account Total



Expected Results

97




statewide by coordinating the exchange of information among various entities regarding the

location and return of missing children, and by assisting law enforcement and other agencies with

missing, abducted, and exploited children cases.

001033 Increase the number of recovered Missing Children

and Adults by 3%.


2011-13 580Q8

566Q7

552Q6

538Q5

524Q4

510Q3

496Q2

482Q1

2009-11 557Q8

553Q7

549Q6

545Q5

589 541Q4

633 537Q3

439 533Q2

525 529Q1


001033 - Increase the number of recovered Missing Children and Adults by 3%.Number

400

440

480

520

560

600

640

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

98



A013 Specialized Outreach Fire Services

This activity is directed by statute to provide critical fire and life safety programs to prevent the

loss of life and property. Activities include delivery of regular and specialized fire service training

and certification at the state Fire Training Academy in North Bend as well as training sites across

the state. Funding is provided to local jurisdictions to assist with the cost of basic firefighter

training. Additional activities include licensing and certifying the fire sprinkler, fireworks and

cigarette industries, and conducting appropriate enforcement action; conducting life safety

inspections of hospitals, nursing homes, group homes, boarding homes, and child daycare centers;

and providing hazardous materials response training and technical assistance to the public and

other state agencies.

99





FTE

1.1 1.1 State 1.1 081-1


$100,500 $122,290 State $222,790 081-1

$178,000 $200,000 Private/Local $378,000 081-7

$322,290 $278,500 $600,790 081 Account Total



FTE

6.3 8.2 Non-Appropriated 7.3 210-6

FTE 11.8 11.8 State 11.8 086-1

FTE 11.7 10.8 State 11.3 001-1

3.4 4.3 Federal 3.9 001-2

FTE 1.0 1.0 Non-Appropriated 1.0 14W-6

FTE 3.0 3.0 State 3.0 173-1

38.2 39.1 37.2 FTE Total


$677,397 $737,003 Non-Appropriated $1,414,400 210-6


$3,885,980 $3,987,140 State $7,873,120 086-1

03P Fire Service Trust Account

$66,000 $65,000 State $131,000 03P-1

001 General Fund

$1,085,306 $1,067,719 State $2,153,025 001-1

$83,301 $298,940 Federal $382,241 001-2

$1,366,659 $1,168,607 $2,535,266 001 Account Total

14W Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity Account

$86,000 $86,000 Non-Appropriated $172,000 14W-6

173 State Toxics Control Account

$256,900 $253,100 State $510,000 173-1



FTE

1.6 1.6 State 1.6 001-1

FTE 4.5 4.5 State 4.5 081-1

0.2 0.2 Private/Local 0.2 081-7

6.3 6.3 6.3 FTE Total

100






$360 $360 State $720 03L-1


$6,660 $6,780 State $13,440 02K-1




$7,710 $2,760 State $10,470 225-1

001 General Fund

$187,973 $208,943 State $396,916 001-1


$20 $0 State $20 02V-1


$771,400 $699,420 State $1,470,820 081-1

$6,570 $4,060 Private/Local $10,630 081-7

$703,480 $777,970 $1,481,450 081 Account Total


Prepare for and respond to emergenciesStatewide Strategy:

Expected Results

Enhance fire safety and emergency response in the state of Washington by providing fire and

emergency mobilization training to local communities, state agencies, industry, and other public

safety agencies.

101






2011-13 9Q8

9Q7

9Q6

9Q5

9Q4

9Q3

9Q2

9Q1

2009-11 6Q8

6Q7

6Q6

6Q5

28 6Q4

4 6Q3

1 6Q2

2 6Q1

02007-09 18Q8

9 18Q7

6 18Q6

20 18Q5

42 72Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


102




0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

103



000954 Number of students trained at the Fire Training

Academy


2011-13 1,325Q8

1,325Q7

1,125Q6

1,125Q5

1,325Q4

1,325Q3

1,125Q2

1,125Q1

2009-11 42Q8

42Q7

42Q6

42Q5

36 42Q4

22 42Q3

0 42Q2

32 42Q1

212007-09 39Q8

30 38Q7

39Q6

85 38Q5

166 140Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


104



000954 - Number of students trained at the Fire Training AcademyNumber

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001034 Percentage of state licensed care facilities in

compliance at conclusion of annual inspection


2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 10%Q8

10%Q7

10%Q6

10%Q5

37% 10%Q4

35% 10%Q3

25% 10%Q2

33% 10%Q1


105



001034 - Percentage of state licensed care facilities in compliance at conclusion of annual

inspection

Percent

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A014 Toxicology Laboratory

The Washington State Toxicology Laboratory performs drug and alcohol testing for all coroners,

medical examiners, police agencies, prosecuting attorneys, and the Liquor Control Board. The

laboratory receives over 8,000 cases each year, of which approximately half are police cases

involving driving under the influence (DUI), sexual assaults, and death investigations. The other

half is coroner/medical examiner casework that supports counties. Each toxicologist tests about

1,000 samples each year and spends one to two days each week in court testifying in DUI-related

cases.

106





FTE

24.8 24.0 State 24.4 02K-1

FTE 1.0 1.0 State 1.0 001-1

FTE 1.9 2.7 State 2.3 081-1

27.7 27.7 27.7 FTE Total


$2,362,736 $2,299,076 State $4,661,812 02K-1

001 General Fund

$84,680 $87,475 State $172,155 001-1


$843,514 $720,175 State $1,563,689 081-1



FTE

1.0 1.0 State 1.0 001-1

FTE 2.4 2.5 State 2.5 081-1

0.2 0.2 Private/Local 0.2 081-7

3.7 3.7 3.6 FTE Total


$200 $200 State $400 03L-1


$13,330 $13,430 State $26,760 02K-1


$2,200 $980 Non-Appropriated $3,180 210-6


$4,350 $1,560 State $5,910 225-1

001 General Fund

$107,020 $119,700 State $226,720 001-1


$10 $0 State $10 02V-1


$439,400 $404,730 State $844,130 081-1

$3,710 $2,290 Private/Local $6,000 081-7

$407,020 $443,110 $850,130 081 Account Total


107




Expected Results


statewide by performing drug and alcohol testing for coroners, medical examiners, law

enforcement agencies, prosecuting attorneys, and the State Liquor Control Board.

000956 Median age in days of toxicology casework

turnaround time


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

21 20Q4

21 15Q3

18 15Q2

17 15Q1

162007-09 15Q8

17 15Q7

17 15Q6

16 15Q5

15 15Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


108



000956 - Median age in days of toxicology casework turnaround timeNumber

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A015 Traffic and Auto Theft Investigation

The Criminal Investigation Division conducts investigations into vehicular homicides, vehicular

assaults, felony hit-and-run, auto thefts, crimes on the Capitol Campus, and threats against elected

officials. It provides investigative follow-up to all felony crimes discovered by uniformed line

troopers, allowing troopers to return to their primary traffic enforcement duties. This activity also

includes participation on the Fuel Tax Evasion Task Force, which works to educate the public and

industry on the fuel tax laws; investigates suspected fuel tax evasion; and pursues prosecution of

fuel tax evaders. The Washington State Patrol Crime Scene Response Team is a joint effort of the

Crime Laboratory Division, the Criminal Investigation Division, and the Identification Section,

providing comprehensive investigative services at crime scenes at the request of any law

enforcement agency in the state.

109





FTE

2.0 2.0 State 2.0 03L-1

FTE 6.8 8.8 State 7.8 001-1

FTE 69.2 67.2 State 68.2 081-1

78.0 78.0 78.0 FTE Total


$164,420 $148,600 State $313,020 03L-1

001 General Fund

$864,007 $771,949 State $1,635,956 001-1

$438,969 $55,731 Private/Local $494,700 001-7

$827,680 $1,302,976 $2,130,656 001 Account Total


$5,628,878 $5,709,888 State $11,338,766 081-1



FTE

2.8 2.8 State 2.8 001-1

0.2 0.2 Private/Local 0.2 001-7

FTE 15.3 16.4 State 15.9 081-1

0.5 0.5 Private/Local 0.5 081-7

19.4 19.9 18.8 FTE Total


$690 $690 State $1,380 03L-1


$6,840 $6,820 State $13,660 02K-1




$4,260 $3,240 State $7,500 086-1


$14,310 $4,830 State $19,140 225-1

001 General Fund

$386,820 $441,270 State $828,090 001-1


$40 $0 State $40 02V-1


110





$2,106,275 $1,846,265 State $3,952,540 081-1

$64,630 $57,190 Private/Local $121,820 081-7

$1,903,455 $2,170,905 $4,074,360 081 Account Total



Expected Results


collision and criminal investigative services to State Patrol line personnel and other criminal

justice agencies.




2011-13 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

10Q4

10Q3

10Q2

10Q1

2009-11 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

12 10Q4

15 10Q3

11 10Q2

13 10Q1


111




10

11

12

13

14

15

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 12Q8

12Q7

12Q6

12Q5

12Q4

12Q3

12Q2

12Q1

2009-11 5Q8

5Q7

5Q6

5Q5

8 5Q4

9 5Q3

12 5Q2

20 5Q1


112




4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

113




inspections


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20 20Q4

13 20Q3

14 20Q2

16 20Q1

14.282007-09 20Q8

9.64 20Q7

10 20Q6

15 20Q5

22 20Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


114




8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

113 5Q4

132 5Q3

103 5Q2

52 5Q1


115




0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

116





2011-13 5,000Q8

5,172Q7

5,539Q6

5,670Q5

5,334Q4

5,539Q3

6,047Q2

6,049Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

5,059Q6

4,827Q5

5,940 4,528Q4

5,859 5,137Q3

5,325 5,705Q2

5,128 6,298Q1

4,7662007-09 8,356Q8

4,859 8,356Q7

5,604 8,357Q6

6,175 8,357Q5

26,913 35,186Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


117




4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

28,000

32,000

36,000

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A016 Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Inspection

Staff in the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Section conduct physical inspections on vehicles

that have been rebuilt after being destroyed or declared a total loss by an insurance company. The

section also performs physical inspections as required on vehicles reported stolen, homemade

vehicles, vehicles without a proper VIN, or in any VIN discrepancy.

118





FTE

6.9 6.3 State 6.6 001-1

FTE 11.6 12.2 State 11.9 081-1

18.5 18.5 18.5 FTE Total

001 General Fund

$585,962 $650,773 State $1,236,735 001-1


$776,957 $711,924 State $1,488,881 081-1



FTE

0.4 0.5 State 0.5 001-1

FTE 2.0 2.0 State 2.0 081-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 081-7

2.6 2.6 2.5 FTE Total


$160 $160 State $320 03L-1


$1,570 $1,570 State $3,140 02K-1


$320 $340 Non-Appropriated $660 210-6


$1,750 $1,750 State $3,500 086-1


$3,290 $1,110 State $4,400 225-1

001 General Fund

$76,060 $82,180 State $158,240 001-1


$10 $0 State $10 02V-1


$345,690 $316,670 State $662,360 081-1

$2,890 $1,790 Private/Local $4,680 081-7

$318,460 $348,580 $667,040 081 Account Total



119



Expected Results

Make Washington roadways safe for the efficient transit of people and goods by performing

physical inspections on vehicles that have been rebuilt and other required vehicles to ensure the

VIN matches documentation presented to the inspector and the Department of Licensing during a

title transaction.




2011-13 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

10Q4

10Q3

10Q2

10Q1

2009-11 10Q8

10Q7

10Q6

10Q5

12 10Q4

15 10Q3

11 10Q2

13 10Q1



10

11

12

13

14

15

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

120





2011-13 12Q8

12Q7

12Q6

12Q5

12Q4

12Q3

12Q2

12Q1

2009-11 5Q8

5Q7

5Q6

5Q5

8 5Q4

9 5Q3

12 5Q2

20 5Q1



4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

121




inspections


2011-13 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20Q4

20Q3

20Q2

20Q1

2009-11 20Q8

20Q7

20Q6

20Q5

20 20Q4

13 20Q3

14 20Q2

16 20Q1

14.282007-09 20Q8

9.64 20Q7

10 20Q6

15 20Q5

22 20Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


122




8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual



2011-13 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

50Q4

50Q3

50Q2

50Q1

2009-11 50Q8

50Q7

50Q6

50Q5

113 5Q4

132 5Q3

103 5Q2

52 5Q1


123




0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

124





2011-13 5,000Q8

5,172Q7

5,539Q6

5,670Q5

5,334Q4

5,539Q3

6,047Q2

6,049Q1

2009-11 Q8

Q7

5,059Q6

4,827Q5

5,940 4,528Q4

5,859 5,137Q3

5,325 5,705Q2

5,128 6,298Q1

4,7662007-09 8,356Q8

4,859 8,356Q7

5,604 8,357Q6

6,175 8,357Q5

26,913 35,186Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


125




4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

28,000

32,000

36,000

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

A017 Transportation Budget Capital Projects

The State Patrol operates facilities that are constructed and maintained with funds appropriated

from the Transportation Budget. These facilities include district and detachment offices,

commercial vehicle weighing and inspection stations, communications centers, microwave and

radio tower sites, and a training facility.

Program 900 - Capital



$1,885,000 $1,885,000 State $3,770,000 081-1



Expected Results

Maintain and construct transportation-related facilities including district and detachment offices,

commercial vehicle weigh stations, and communications sites.

A018 Homeland Security

The Vessel and Terminal Security Division (VATS) provides enhanced security for state ferries

and terminals in Washington. A security plan was developed by the Department of Transportation

(WSDOT) to comply with the U.S. Coast Guard Security Level 1 and 2 regulatory requirements.

In order to meet concerns associated with possible terrorist activities on state ferries and to comply

with the WSDOT security plan, the WSP deploys explosive detection canine and handler teams

and provides electronic surveillance of public access areas in vessels and terminals.

126



127





FTE

3.0 1.0 State 2.0 001-1

FTE 79.0 81.0 State 80.0 081-1

82.0 82.0 82.0 FTE Total

001 General Fund

$171,434 $0 State $171,434 001-1

$0 $1,067,000 Federal $1,067,000 001-2

$126,200 $33,899 Private/Local $160,099 001-7

$1,100,899 $297,634 $1,398,533 001 Account Total


$8,392,736 $8,566,070 State $16,958,806 081-1

$188,300 $233,200 Federal $421,500 081-2

$8,799,270 $8,581,036 $17,380,306 081 Account Total



FTE

3.2 3.3 State 3.3 001-1

0.1 0.1 Private/Local 0.1 001-7

FTE 16.6 16.7 State 16.7 081-1

0.6 0.6 Private/Local 0.6 081-7

20.6 20.7 20.5 FTE Total


$700 $700 State $1,400 03L-1


$6,970 $6,940 State $13,910 02K-1




$7,750 $7,750 State $15,500 086-1


$14,580 $4,920 State $19,500 225-1

001 General Fund

$338,505 $364,765 State $703,270 001-1


$40 $0 State $40 02V-1


128





$1,900,200 $1,646,030 State $3,546,230 081-1

$65,830 $58,250 Private/Local $124,080 081-7

$1,704,280 $1,966,030 $3,670,310 081 Account Total



Expected Results


enhanced security for state ferries and terminals across the Washington State Ferry System.

001026 Exceed Maritime Security (MARSEC) requirements


2011-13 100Q8

100Q7

100Q6

100Q5

100Q4

100Q3

100Q2

100Q1

2009-11 100Q8

100Q7

100Q6

100Q5

102 100Q4

103 100Q3

101 100Q2

103 100Q1


129



001026 - Exceed Maritime Security (MARSEC) requirementsNumber

100.0

100.4

100.8

101.2

101.6

102.0

102.4

102.8

103.2

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001031 Increase the score of both state and local agency

interoperability


2011-13 5Q8

4.8Q7

4.7Q6

4.6Q5

4.5Q4

4.4Q3

4.2Q2

4Q1

2009-11 4Q8

3.8Q7

3.8Q6

3.8Q5

3.8 3.6Q4

3.8 3.6Q3

3.8 3.5Q2

3.4 3.5Q1


130



001031 - Increase the score of both state and local agency interoperabilityNumber

3.4

3.6

3.8

4.0

4.2

4.4

4.6

4.8

5.0

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001027 Increase trooper vessel ride hours


2011-13 110Q8

110Q7

110Q6

110Q5

110Q4

110Q3

110Q2

110Q1

2009-11 110Q8

110Q7

110Q6

110Q5

174 110Q4

105 110Q3

45 110Q2

31 110Q1


131



001027 - Increase trooper vessel ride hoursNumber

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

132






2011-13 9Q8

9Q7

9Q6

9Q5

9Q4

9Q3

9Q2

9Q1

2009-11 6Q8

6Q7

6Q6

6Q5

28 6Q4

4 6Q3

1 6Q2

2 6Q1

02007-09 18Q8

9 18Q7

6 18Q6

20 18Q5

42 72Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1


133




0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sep-0

7

Dec

-07

Mar

-08

Jun-

08

Sep-0

8

Dec

-08

Mar

-09

Jun-

09

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

001028 Percent of staff trained in the COOP Plan


2011-13 100%Q8

100%Q7

100%Q6

100%Q5

100%Q4

100%Q3

100%Q2

100%Q1

2009-11 100%Q8

80%Q7

60%Q6

40%Q5

2% 20%Q4

2% 15%Q3

2% 10%Q2

2% 5%Q1


134



001028 - Percent of staff trained in the COOP PlanPercent

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sep-0

9

Dec

-09

Mar

-10

Jun-

10

Sep-1

0

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-1

1

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-1

2

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Target Actual

Grand Total

FTE's

GFS

Other

Total

FY 2012 FY 2013 Biennial Total

2,446.9

$42,184,726

$217,656,246

2,514.5

$39,600,095

$229,613,766

$269,213,861

2,480.7

$81,784,821

$447,270,012

$529,054,833 $259,840,972

135

Washington State PatrolConsultants Used in the 2009-11 Biennium

Contract Number Type Project Vendor Start Date End Date Amount Program Bureau

C100229 PSC Meeting Facilitator Preferred Planners 10/29/2009 6/30/2010 $26,000 SIEC Technical Services Bureau

C100036 PSC Basic Legal Instruction WAPA 9/15/2009 9/14/2014 $95,000 Training Academy Technical Services Bureau

C110005 PSC Communication Skills Training Baker, Howard Jr. 9/14/2010 9/14/2010 $750 ACCESS Investigative Services Bureau

C100264 PSC Arabic Culture Militant Sam Kamkar 9/23/2009 9/24/2009 $1,800 Field Force Field Operations Bureau

C100319 PSC Petro Bomb Training Densus Group 9/22/2009 9/23/2009 $7,528 Field Force Field Operations Bureau

C100560 PSC Public Safety Speaker Kevin Gilmartin Ph.D. 1/22/2010 1/22/2010 $3,800 Field Force Field Operations Bureau

C100820 PSC Presentation Skills Class JoAnn Nai-che, LLC 4/22/2010 4/23/2010 $1,900 Field Force Field Operations Bureau

C100079 PSC LT Assessment Center Cederblom, Doug 7/17/2009 5/31/2010 $16,170 Human Resources Technical Services Bureau

C100102 PSC Counseling Services Hurst, Mark 7/1/2009 6/30/2010 $4,950 Labor Relations Office of the Chief

C110122 PSC Counseling Services Hurst, Mark 7/1/2010 6/30/2011 $4,950 Office of the Chief Office of the Chief

At this time, we cannot project consultant usage for the 2011-13 Biennium.

Personal Service Contracts (PSCs) – State Patrol Highway Account (Fund 081)



WSP Trooper

Recruitment and Retention Issues The Washington State Patrol (WSP) is committed to making a difference everyday to enhance the security and safety of our state through efforts to become the best public safety agency in the country. To accomplish our mission, we must consistently maintain sufficient trooper levels. Local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies continue to face significant challenges recruiting adequate numbers of applicants for current and future vacancies. Recruitment outputs were considerably lower in 2009 in comparison to 2007 and 2008. This is not dissimilar to other local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies which face significant challenges recruiting adequate numbers of applicants for current and future vacancies. The WSP experienced a 24 percent decline in applications received compared to 2008, and a 35 percent decline compared to 2007 despite a significant statewide increase in the labor pool resulting from nationwide economic challenges. Furthermore, state budgetary issues contributed to the cancellation of one of the four trooper cadet arming classes scheduled between 2007 and 2010. However, federal funding assisted the WSP in running a 21-person trooper cadet arming class in October 2009 to support future “Target Zero” efforts. Between October 2007 and June 2010, 142 cadets were commissioned. A 57-person Arming Class will be conducted between July and September 2010 followed by a 54-person Trooper Basic Training Class beginning in September and graduating a projected 46 new troopers on March 16, 2011. 2009 Recruitment Initiatives Recruitment outputs were considerably lower in 2009 compared to 2008. A 95 percent reduction in funding for recruitment initiatives contributed to a 24 percent decline in the number of trooper cadet applications received in 2009. We applied funds towards the following recruitment initiatives:

• Radio announcements • Newspaper advertisements • Job fairs

The following areas were contributing factors to the decline in recruitment outputs:

• The Westside and Eastside recruiters were reassigned to the Field Operations Bureau (FOB)

• Public misperception that the state “Hiring Freeze” included vacant trooper positions

• The failing economy and increased lay-offs triggered fear in potential applicants who once desired to take a chance to start a new career



Despite the challenges faced in 2009, the agency met its hiring needs for the 21st Trooper Cadet Arming Class and the 97th Trooper Basic Training Class. However, filling a 57-person July 2010 Arming Class has nearly exhausted the trooper cadet eligibility list and created a new challenge to meet the hiring needs for the July 2011 Arming Class. January 2010 through June 2010 Recruitment In an effort to fill the July 2010 Arming Class with 57 or more qualified trooper cadets, we implemented a media release in April 2010, highlighting our challenge in finding enough qualified candidates for the upcoming class that could meet its hiring and fitness standards. The media release was picked up by many major television, radio, and print media sources sparking an aggressive 10 day statewide recrutiment blitz. The blitz involved media sources that reached California, Idaho, and Oregon. This 10 day recruiting campaign resulted in us processing 335 applications in April. This was the largest number of applications received in a one month period since November 2006. Current and Future Recruitment and Retention Issues As of June 30, 2010, the WSP has 30 FOB trooper vacancies. Twenty-one fully commissioned officers have retired between January 1, 2010, and the end of June 2010. Anticipated attrition of WSP troopers over the next 12 months is a loss of approximately 24 more officers. To meet the current and anticipated hiring needs for troopers, the goal of the Washington State Patrol is to administer an Arming and Trooper Basic Training Class every nine to twelve months. The WSP projects a need of 40 or more trooper cadets for each of the next several arming classes. To meet these hiring goals for each arming class, the WSP will need to receive approximately 1,149 applications from individuals who meet the Washington State Patrol’s entry-level hiring standards every nine to twelve months This will allow sufficient time to conduct background investigations, psychological examinations, and medical examinations, and allow for new hires to notify their current employers of their career change. The next arming class is scheduled to begin training in July 2011. To sustain the current recruitment initiative, the WSP would need approximately $240,000 per biennium in additional funding.



Vehicle Fleet Life-Cycle Analysis

In fulfillment of its traffic safety mission, the Washington State Patrol traffic law enforcement officers drive about 24,250,000 miles annually—an average of about 25,000 miles for each pursuit vehicle. Over the past six biennia, the increasing cost of managing the Washington State Patrol’s vehicle fleet has mandated closer scrutiny of vehicle purchase, equipping, maintenance, and fuel costs as well as fleet management practices. The 2003-2005 Transportation Budget directed the WSP to update a 1998 Life-Cycle Cost Model to determine the optimum point where the total cost of owning, operating, and maintaining a vehicle is the least expensive. The point where the lowest average cost per mile is reached represents the most cost-effective replacement schedule. To fulfill the proviso from the 2003-2005 Transportation Budget, we acquired and adopted an “off-the-shelf” software model from the National Association of Fleet Administrators (NAFA). The Life-Cycle Cost Model calculates replacement cycle alternatives by considering all relevant cost variables, including:

Capital Costs: • Purchase cost • Equipping costs • Decommissioning costs • Trade-in value Operating Costs: • Repairs • Service intervals per warranty standards • Insurance • Fuel and oil, based on average annual mileage

The Life-cycle Cost Model has been recently updated for 2010. The following are highlights of this analysis and demonstrate the major changes since 2008:

• The number of vehicles in the pursuit fleet has increased slightly since 2008 (716 vehicles in 2008 and 736 in 2010).

• The net acquisition cost has remained fairly constant ($29,342 in 2008

compared to $29,300 in 2010). • The average vehicle miles per gallon have remained the same since 2008

(12.0 miles per gallon in 2008 and 12.1 miles per gallon in 2010).



• After inputting a set of defined variable data into the model, the optimum replacement mileage for pursuit vehicles remains at 110,000; the same as was concluded in the 2008 cost model.

• The life-cycle cost of a WSP pursuit sedan that averages 25,000 miles per

year drops from $0.839 per mile at 50,000 miles to $0.675 per mile at 110,000 miles.

Based on the results of this vehicle cost model, the State Patrol will:

• Continue to update the pursuit vehicle life-cycle cost model biennially and use

the model for determining the optimum replacement mileage for other types of vehicles.

• Use the model as a basis for vehicle funding requests to the legislature

(contingent on available fund balance).

• Work towards replacing vehicles at the optimum mileage identified in the model (contingent on available funding).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1314

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

5556

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH

Model: Pursuit Sedan

Vehicles in Fleet: 736 Annual Miles Driven: 25,000 Annual Shifts: 256 Maximum Replacement Years: 6 Maximum Replacement Miles: 150,000 Net Acquisition Cost: 29,300.00$ Return on Investment: 2.000%Fuel Miles-per-Gallon 12.1 Fuel Cost-per-Gallon: 3.07$ Pool Loaner Cost-per-Mile: 0.62$

Mileage Parts & Labor Shifts DownService/Repair Interval Cost per Incident Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down Freq. Repair Down

PM A with safety inspection 5,000 50$ 0.0 10.0 500$ -$ 15 750$ -$ 17 850$ -$ 18 900$ -$ 20 1,000$ -$ 22 1,100$ -$ 24 1,200$ -$ 26 1,300$ -$ 28 1,400$ -$ 30 1,500$ -$

PM B (A + trans service, brake inspection) 30,000 180$ 0.5 1.0 180$ 30$ 2 360$ 61$ 2 360$ 61$ 3 540$ 91$ 3 540$ 91$ 3 540$ 91$ 4 720$ 121$ 4 720$ 121$ 4 720$ 121$ 5 900$ 151$

PM C (A + B + tune up) 60,000 300$ 0.5 - -$ -$ 1 300$ 30$ 1 300$ 30$ 1 300$ 30$ 1 300$ 30$ 1 300$ 30$ 2 600$ 61$ 2 600$ 61$ 2 600$ 61$ 2 600$ 61$

air conditioning 60,000 450$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 1 450$ 61$ 1 450$ 61$ 1 450$ 61$ 1 450$ 61$ 1 450$ 61$ 2 900$ 121$ 2 900$ 121$ 2 900$ 121$ 2 900$ 121$

auxiliary - lights, siren, radio 40,000 150$ 0.5 1.0 150$ 30$ 1 150$ 30$ 2 300$ 61$ 2 300$ 61$ 2 300$ 61$ 3 450$ 91$ 3 450$ 91$ 3 450$ 91$ 2 300$ 61$ 3 450$ 91$

battery 30,000 75$ 0.0 1.0 75$ -$ 2 150$ -$ 2 150$ -$ 3 225$ -$ 3 225$ -$ 3 225$ -$ 4 300$ -$ 4 300$ -$ 4 300$ -$ 5 375$ -$

brake - pads, disc, drum 10,000 500$ 0.5 5.0 2,500$ 151$ 7 3,500$ 212$ 8 4,000$ 242$ 9 4,500$ 272$ 10 5,000$ 303$ 11 5,500$ 333$ 12 6,000$ 363$ 13 6,500$ 394$ 14 7,000$ 424$ 15 7,500$ 454$

brakes - master cylinder, calipers, ABS 60,000 400$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 1 400$ 61$ 1 400$ 61$ 1 400$ 61$ 1 400$ 61$ 1 400$ 61$ 2 800$ 121$ 2 800$ 121$ 2 800$ 121$ 2 800$ 121$

cooling system 60,000 140$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 1 140$ 61$ 1 140$ 61$ 1 140$ 61$ 1 140$ 61$ 1 140$ 61$ 2 280$ 121$ 2 280$ 121$ 2 280$ 121$ 2 280$ 121$

engine* Prorate 4,500$ 5.0 - -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.02 90$ 6$ 0.05 225$ 15$ 0.1 450$ 30$ 0.2 900$ 61$ 0.4 1,800$ 121$ 0.7 3,150$ 212$ 1 4,500$ 303$

exhaust* Prorate 500$ 0.5 - -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.02 10$ 1$ 0.05 25$ 2$ 0.1 50$ 3$ 0.2 100$ 6$ 0.4 200$ 12$ 0.7 350$ 21$ 1 500$ 30$

emission controls* Prorate 1,500$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.02 30$ 1$ 0.05 75$ 3$ 0.1 150$ 6$ 0.2 300$ 12$ 0.4 600$ 24$ 0.7 1,050$ 42$ 1 1,500$ 61$

front end/suspension 80,000 300$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$ 1 300$ 61$

tires 15,000 400$ 0.3 3.0 1,200$ 54$ 5 2,000$ 91$ 5 2,000$ 91$ 6 2,400$ 109$ 6 2,400$ 109$ 7 2,800$ 127$ 8 3,200$ 145$ 8 3,200$ 145$ 9 3,600$ 163$ 10 4,000$ 182$

transmission* Prorate 2,300$ 1.0 - -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.02 46$ 1$ 0.05 115$ 3$ 0.1 230$ 6$ 0.2 460$ 12$ 0.4 920$ 24$ 0.7 1,610$ 42$ 1 2,300$ 61$

insurance 25,000 1,338$ 0.0 2.0 2,677$ -$ 3 4,015$ -$ 3 4,015$ -$ 3 4,015$ -$ 4 5,354$ -$ 4 5,354$ -$ 4 5,354$ -$ 5 6,692$ -$ 5 6,692$ -$ 6 8,031$ -$

miscellaneous** 20,000/10,000 250$ 0.3 2.0 500$ 36$ 3 750$ 54$ 4 1,000$ 73$ 4 1,000$ 73$ 5 1,250$ 91$ 6 1,500$ 109$ 7 1,750$ 127$ 8 2,000$ 145$ 9 2,250$ 163$ 10 2,500$ 182$

Lifecycle Cost by Type Expense: 7,782$ 303$ 12,965$ 660$ 14,265$ 799$ 15,646$ 887$ 18,099$ 949$ 19,939$ 1,069$ 23,614$ 1,423$ 27,562$ 1,562$ 31,302$ 1,735$ 36,936$ 1,998$

Lifecycle Total:Annual Cost by Type Expense: 3,891$ 151$ 4,322$ 220$ 4,196$ 235$ 4,346$ 246$ 4,525$ 237$ 4,532$ 243$ 4,920$ 296$ 5,300$ 300$ 5,590$ 310$ 6,156$ 333$

Annual Total:

Years Held: 2.00 3.00 3.40

Mileage at Replacement 50,000 75,000 85,000 Projected Resale Price - Adjusted NADA 7,500$ 5,300$ 4,750$

Total Fixed Cost 21,200$ 23,400$ 23,950$ Annual Fixed Cost 10,600$ 7,800$ 7,044$ Capital Cost-per-Mile 0.424$ 0.312$ 0.282$

Maintenance 8,085$ 13,625$ 15,065$ Fuel 12,686$ 19,029$ 21,566$

Total Operating Costs 20,771$ 32,654$ 36,631$ Annual Operating Cost 10,385$ 10,885$ 10,774$

Operating Cost-per-Mile 0.415$ 0.435$ 0.431$ Lifecycle Total Cost 41,970.62$ 56,054.29$ 60,580.74$

Lifecycle Annual Cost 20,985.31$ 18,684.76$ 17,817.86$

Lifecycle Cost-per-Mile 0.839$ 0.747$ 0.713$

Annual Fixed Cost of Fleet 7,801,600$ 5,740,800$ 5,184,471$ Annual Operating Cost of Fleet 7,643,589$ 8,011,186$ 7,929,478$

Total Annual Cost 15,445,189$ 13,751,986$ 13,113,948$ Annual Savings (Over Highest Cost Option) -$ 1,693,203$ 2,331,240$ Investment Income From Savings -$ 33,864$ 46,625$

Total Annual Savings -$ 1,727,067$ 2,377,865$ Annual cost over least cost option (3,030,773)$ (1,364,322)$ (713,523)$ (598,583)$ (347,245)$ (26,498)$ Percent over least cost option 24.4% 11.0% 5.7% 4.8% 2.8% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 2.1%Optimum Years - - - Mileage at Optimum Years - - -

*Prorate intervals are estimated to have a 2% occurrence at 90K, an additional 3% at 100K, 5% at 110K, 10% at 120K, 20% at 130K, and 30% each at 140K and 150K.**Miscellaneous repairs are estimated to have an occurrence every 20K miles up to 100K, and every 10K miles thereafter.

Annual Savings + Interest Income

5,216$ 5,601$

Lifecycle cost per mile--lowest cost indicates the best choice

Lifecycle cost per year; divide by years in period to get annual cost for one vehicle

Annual operation cost amount

Annual capital budget requirements assuming steady replacement

Annual operating budget requirements assuming steady replacement

Full direct cost for this fleet of vehicles

Cost savings of this option over the worst option shown

Interest income from the savings if invested at ROI rate entered

Lifecycle cost of repairs and downtime from Maintenance Estimate table

Lifecycle fuel costs based on Fuel Cost-per-Gallon, MPG and mileage

2,777,806$

38,934$ 38,058$ 76,992$

103,266.71$

0.688$

Lifecycle cost total for the entire holding period

Cumulative mileage for years in service based on annual mileage

Annual depreciation amount

Depreciation amount for the lifecycle

140,000 Maintenance Estimate

120,000

21,008$

90,000 4,475$

13,625$ 15,065$

110,000

19,048$ 33,037$ 38,934$

Notes:

5,899$ 6,489$ 4,762$ 4,774$

6.00

150,000 2,425$

5.60

140,000

5.20

130,000 2,825$

4,593$

Washington State Patrol Pursuit Vehicle Lifecycle Cost Analysis

2007-2009 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor

Cost-per-Mile of providing a backup vehicle while the primary vehicle is being worked on

Description:

Expected miles to be driven each year

The number of normal man-shifts the vehicle operates during a year

Net purchase price including all make-ready expenses, labor

Variable Data

Upper limit for years to hold a vehicle based on policy decision

Upper limit for mileage to hold a vehicle based on policy decision

The annual percentage rate earned on cash investments

Mileage of vehicle being analyzed

Fuel cost-per-gallon (June 2010 Forecast for FY2011)

Total number of vehicles of this type in fleet

150,000

4.40 Optimum Replacement Years:110,000 Mileage at Optimum Replacement:

69,319.85$

8,085$ 25,037$ 29,124$

3,400$

0.675$

27,909$

0.199$

50,000 90,000 100,000 75,000 85,000

2,625$

110,000 130,000

4.40 4.00

100,000

16,533$

4,542$

4.80

120,000

4,431$

26,075$ 26,275$

48,917$

0.707$

22,835$

10,936$

3,427,000$ 3,223,067$

94,632.67$

11,944$

74,216.62$

16,867.41$

87,982.92$

0.437$ 12,242$ 12,832$

16,919.79$ 17,664.76$ 17,329.96$

4,581,600$ 4,232,000$ 3,933,000$ 4,952,667$

63,593.13$

3.60

29,124$ Operating Costs

Fixed Cost

3,050$

4,656$ 4,976$ 5,344$

16,533$

55,483$ 62,108$

21,008$ 19,048$ 25,372$

39,368$

33,037$ 35,521$ 68,558$

32,983$

0.175$ 0.186$

25,650$ 25,875$

4,042$

24,900$ 25,300$

0.676$

81,133.01$

30,446$

0.693$

44,420$

4,379$

17,211.12$

0.269$

25,037$

0.490$ 0.513$

16,898.69$

0.676$

0.214$ 0.230$ 0.249$ 5,750$

24,225$ 6,225$ 6,729$

3,800$

- - 110,000.00 -

3,067,907$ 2,833,362$

- - 4.40 - - - -

2,492,806$ 2,744,144$ 3,091,388$

- - -

(23,481)$ (258,026)$ (39,323)$

3,662,308$ 8,507,394$

12,452,967$

11,559$

13,001,262$ 12,754,852$ 12,414,416$

16,902.71$

3,064,890$

3,030,773$

0.677$

0.462$ 0.478$ 0.444$ 0.445$ 11,105$ 11,117$

Fleet-Wide Financial Impact of the Decision

3,052,066$

3,004,794$ 2,443,927$ 2,690,337$ 60,155$ 55,556$

3,007,752$ 2,992,221$

9,444,316$ 12,440,394$

48,879$ 53,807$ 60,615$ 60,096$

12,667,383$ 8,048,595$ 8,173,252$

12,437,437$ 9,010,437$ 8,182,416$

59,844$

8,790,660$

National Association of Fleet Administrators, Inc. 33a Life Cycle analysis for Vehicles.xlsx - Optimum Replacement As of: 9/3/2010,10:01 AM



Aviation Maintenance and Life-cycle Analysis

The Washington State Patrol’s Aviation Section operates and maintains seven aircraft - two multi-engine King Air 200s and five single engine Cessnas. The two multi-engine aircraft provide transportation services for the Governor, State Patrol personnel, and other state agencies. The five Cessna aircraft provide impaired driving enforcement with the DUI Aerial Response Team (DART), traffic congestion management (METRO), aerial homeland security, and aerial law enforcement support services. These services are provided in a safe, reliable, and efficient manner. Maintenance of WSP Aircraft: All WSP aircraft are maintained and operated in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) part 91, part 43, and part 65, in addition to the airframe/engine manufacturer’s maintenance requirements, and the WSP Aviation Section Standard Operations Procedures (SOP) Manual. Aircraft maintenance is governed by FAR part 91 subpart E, “Maintenance, Preventative Maintenance and Alterations” specifically for the Cessna aircraft, and subpart F, “Large and Turbine Powered Multiengine Airplanes and Fractional Ownership Program Aircraft” for the King Air aircraft. These regulations cover who is responsible for maintaining the aircraft, how the maintenance will be performed, and when maintenance is required. The general provisions of Part 91, subpart E, states that the owner or operator is primarily responsible for maintaining the aircraft in an airworthy condition, including compliance with part 39 of the chapter (airworthiness directives). Federal Aviation Regulations further state that an aircraft may not be operated unless it is in compliance with the manufacturer’s maintenance manual, instructions for continued airworthiness, and airworthiness limitations section. This includes life limited parts and inspection intervals. Cessna aircraft are inspected under a progressive inspection program (phase maintenance) approved by the Cessna Aircraft Corporation and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Flight Standards District Office. The aircraft receive routine maintenance, in addition to phase maintenance: Phase 1 inspection every 50 hours, Phase 2 every 100 hours, and Phase 3 inspection every 600 hours. Any discrepancies incurred between phase inspections are corrected prior to further flights or deferred to the next scheduled inspection, depending on the status of the discrepancy. Electronic descriptions of all phase maintenance records are available upon request. The Cessna aircraft also are equipped with law enforcement mission equipment that require maintenance and life-cycle replacement. This equipment includes Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) stabilized cameras, digital downlink systems, GPS mapping systems, public safety radios, and Mobile Computer Network (MCN). King Air aircraft are maintained under the manufacturer’s approved Biennial Inspection program. This program is tailored to operators who fly less than 200 hours in a 24



calendar month period. The program allows an Interim Inspection to be performed within 12 months of the last inspection and a Complete Inspection to be performed within 24 months. Any problems incurred between phase inspections are corrected prior to further flights or deferred to the next scheduled inspection, depending on the status of the discrepancy. Electronic descriptions of all phase maintenance records are available upon request. In addition to phase maintenance, all WSP aircraft must comply with airworthiness directives (ADs) and special inspections as outlined by the FAA. Airworthiness directives are received from four separate sources: Computerized Aviation Maintenance System (CAMS), which provides bi-monthly updates. CD ROM format provided bi-monthly and computerized daily updates by a commercial vendor (T-data), manufacturer websites, and direct mailings from the FAA Flight Standards District Office. Special inspections required under FAR part 91.411, “Altimeter System and Altitude Reporting Equipment Test and Inspections” and part 91.413 “ATC Transponder Tests and Inspections” are completed on a 24 calendar month basis and apply to all aircraft. All maintenance is recorded according to FAR 91.417 and 91.421. Aircraft Useful Life Determination: As with any product, an aircraft’s value depreciates over time. The reduction in value (life cycle costing) arises from a number of factors, including the following:

• increased cost of maintenance and repair • daily wear and tear • lack of or discontinued parts • dispatch reliability and availability; and • upgrading to comply with mandated legislation

Industry standards indicate that aircraft older than five years (out of warranty) have significantly higher costs than new aircraft. A 20-year-old aircraft (10 years for Cessna aircraft based on historical data) has approximately 50-60 percent higher maintenance costs than a new aircraft under warranty. This does not include engines, which further increase costs. The increased cost to maintain aircraft is primarily due to unscheduled maintenance and discontinued parts. An example of this is the Patrol’s 1983 King Air. The factory has discontinued support and parts for the landing gear system, thus requiring an upgrade to the newer hydraulic system. This is an unscheduled cost of $60,000 and results in a minimum of 30 days of maintenance down time. Aging aircraft leads to an even greater problem: decreased dispatch reliability and availability. The WSP Aviation Section is the largest law enforcement air asset in the state, and it is tasked with 24/7 call-out availability.



Industry data indicate that aircraft availability becomes a significant problem for King Air aircraft older than 20 years of age. Aircraft availability drops off from a high of 95 percent for newer aircraft (0-5 years), to an average of 70 percent at age 25, and 55 percent at age 30. The above issues will help determine the optimal time to replace the older WSP aircraft. Older aircraft require more maintenance and higher-priced parts and upgrades due to declining availability. Delays in replacing older aircraft will result in lost reliability due to maintenance down time that could adversely affect the WSP’s ability to provide emergency 24/7 readiness.



Interoperability Communications Systems

Following the needless loss of life on September 11, 2001, when police received the word to evacuate before the second tower collapsed and firefighters did not, interoperability rose to the fore as a top national concern. Interoperability refers to the ability of emergency responders to share information via voice and data on demand, in real time, when needed, and as authorized. But interoperability is not only important for events such as 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina. There are a number of crisis situations that can happen in any community on any day requiring interoperability. Every day, firefighters, law enforcement, emergency medical services, hazmat experts and other emergency responders band together to save lives across city, county, state, tribal, and federal boundaries. The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has long recognized the need to communicate among first responders on a daily basis. In 2001, the State Interoperability Committee was formed as an ad-hoc group of state agency communications professionals. The purpose of this group was to look for areas where communication gaps occurred and work together to find and implement solutions. The Washington State Patrol Electronic Services Division played a prominent role in this committee. The Washington State Interoperability Executive Committee (SIEC), a permanent sub-committee of the Information Services Board, was formed by legislation effective on July 1, 2003. It was the intent of the legislature that the state's considerable investment in radio communications facilities and radio spectrum licensed to the state would be managed in such a way as to ensure economic efficiencies by coordinated planning, development, and management. Additionally, the SIEC was to ensure that investments in communications systems by the state would be consistent with the efforts by local first responders to further interoperability. The first chair of the SIEC was the Chief of the Washington State Patrol. In 2006, the Washington State Patrol was named as the lead agency for implementation of the SIEC Technical Implementation Plan (TIP). The Washington State Patrol has been a key player in some very successful interoperability efforts. These successes include:

• Radio over Internet Protocol (RoIP) interoperability systems. The WSP was a key partner in fielding the first large-scale RoIP interoperable communications system in the state, the Olympic Public Safety Communications Alliance Network (OPSCAN). This was a consortium of 42 agencies - state, federal, local and tribal. The Washington State Patrol, the Washington Military Department’s Emergency Management Division, Department of Natural Resources, and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) partnered to deploy the On Scene Command and Coordination Radio system (OSCCR) that connects 16 radio sites on a common mutual aid channel around the state. These sites are monitored and can be controlled by all eight WSP Communications Centers, the state Emergency Operations



Center at Camp Murray, and the WSDOT Emergency Operations Center in Olympia.

• 2010 Olympics Security Committee – The WSP was the co-lead with the FBI

on the Communications and Interoperability Working Group, tasked with providing interoperable voice, data, and video systems supporting the 2009 Police and Fire Games and the 2010 Winter Olympic Games security efforts in Washington State.

Current efforts underway by the WSP include:

• State Interoperability Executive Committee staffing - These positions include the SIEC Senior Project Manager and the Public Affairs and Community Outreach Coordinator. Two other positions (an Engineering Manager and an Administrative position) were lost due to budget cuts in 2009. Staff has facilitated Interoperability workshops in eight of nine Washington State Homeland Security Regions, assisted in the formation of regional interoperability committees, and held Interoperability Summits in both Eastern and Western Washington.

• Project 25 Pilot - In an effort to improve interoperability between federal,

state, and local law enforcement agencies, a pilot project is underway in which WSP troopers are utilizing the federal Integrated Wireless Network digital trunked radio system. This pilot has shown the viability of this technology for state users, while minimizing the investment needed by using existing infrastructure. This project is currently in the assessment phase.

• Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grants – The Washington State

Patrol is partnering with the Washington State Homeland Security Regions 1 and 2 to build digital microwave infrastructure. This infrastructure will support both the P25 pilot project, as well as existing and new RoIP interoperable radio systems. The WSP has also partnered with Pierce County and the city of Tacoma to upgrade all dispatch consoles in the primary dispatch centers in the region to a common platform and interconnecting the dispatch systems.

• Cross border communications - Governor Gregoire and British Columbia

Premier Gordon Campbell put in place a Memorandum of Understanding regarding cross border communications interoperability which commits WSP and British Columbia public safety radio system operators to conduct workshops on both sides of the border with first responders. These workshops help to identify interoperability gaps, formulate a strategy to fill these gaps, and develop interoperable communications agreements and communications plans.

• Washington State Procedures and Protocols Working Group – The

Washington State Patrol is leading an effort, in partnership with local first



responder groups from around the state, to develop standard communications procedures and best practices for public safety agencies to adopt for interoperability communications. These include use of plain language, common channel naming, and others.

• •




Facilities Issues The Washington State Patrol (WSP) manages over 200 unique, complex and diverse public safety facilities across the state to meet the agency’s mission and goals. This includes district offices, detachments, commercial vehicle enforcement weighing stations, crime labs, training academies, and communication towers, representing over one million square feet of facility space. As the business needs within these facilities have become more complex, the systems and equipment within the facilities have also increased in complexity. The WSP has been operating its facilities with limited funding and has often taken every measure to keep failing systems in operation. We have traditionally requested minimal capital funding to address only the most critical needs due to the limited fund balances available in the State Patrol Highway Account. We are currently embarking on a facilities life cycle study, which should serve as a tool for future facility system maintenance and replacement needs, as well as identification of future capital projects. Due to the age and usage of many of our facilities, several critical needs remain as described below. Critical Needs: Due to the age of many of our buildings and the 24/7 operations that are required of most buildings, the WSP has seen significant ongoing expenditures for Heating/Ventilation/Air Conditioning repair. These are operational expenditures that do not fall under Capital Minor Works funding and are not funded repairs. Between 2005 and 2009, we incurred nearly $50,000 per year in HVAC maintenance costs due to failing system components and increased loads from computer, communication and electrical equipment within the facilities. These costs were largely absorbed by the operational budget. This work was required to maintain operations within the facility and a safe working environment for our employees. We have completed several capital projects to replace failing HVAC systems and have also participated in several Energy Service Company (ESCO) energy-savings projects, which have resulted in the replacement of HVAC systems. However, due to the age and use of many of our facilities, our agency still realizes a large draw each year from operational funds to make critical HVAC repairs at facilities and communication tower sites. The Washington State Patrol operates the Washington State Fire Training Academy (FTA) where unique live-fire training is offered to firefighter programs throughout the state. This realistic training environment is highly coveted by the fire service. Within the last several years, we have identified higher levels of total dissolved solids, oil and grease, and varying pH levels in the FTA storm water ponds. We have a responsibility to test these ponds each month and report results to the Washington State Department of Ecology under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. We have been working with Department of Ecology and a third-party consultant to



identify the root cause of the testing anomalies. As a result, it is recommended that we perform additional operational and maintenance steps each biennium to ensure that the storm water ponds are in compliance and within permit levels. This includes regular cleaning of the oil/water separator at approximately $65,000 per biennium. We did have the oil/water separator cleaned in the 2007-09 Biennium under a Minor Works project, but biennial maintenance will need to be included in future operational budgets. In addition, we have identified several facility needs that will need to be addressed in the next two biennia: Olympia Detachment: This building is currently being leased and serves as the primary office space for troopers in the Olympia area. Located off of Tumwater Boulevard, this is an aging building. The lease expires at the end of 2010, and it is currently unknown whether the landlord will extend this lease as it has previously been discussed that the building may be torn down to accommodate a build to suit application. The Washington State Patrol’s detachments are an integral part of highway enforcement as they serve as a “home base” for troopers to write reports, process evidence, download information, and hold detachment meetings. Additionally, the detachments have daily public contact as citizens seek information on collision reports, ask questions, and report incidents. It is imperative that we, if faced with a move, find a location in the greater Olympia area that has easy freeway access for emergency dispatch purposes. We will be working with General Administration on this in the coming months. WSP Olympia Headquarters Building: The Washington State Patrol Headquarters is currently located on several floors of the General Administration building. This location has served the agency well as it is located on the Capitol Campus. WSP is responsible for capitol campus security, executive protection, and Sylvester and Heritage park law enforcement, and these duties are conducive to a headquarters facility located on or near the campus. With the eventual disposition of the General Administration building unknown, we are interested in identifying a new permanent headquarters on or near the Capitol Campus. This will allow consolidation of several functions within the Washington State Patrol, many of which are currently being housed in leased facilities throughout the Thurston County area. By combining these functions within a new Washington State Patrol Headquarters facility, we could reduce the number of leased facilities and the corresponding monthly lease costs, as well as provide better customer service to citizens through consolidation of facilities.




Capital Projects The Washington State Patrol (WSP) manages over 200 unique, complex and diverse public safety facilities across the state to meet the agency’s mission and goals. This includes district offices, detachments, commercial vehicle enforcement weighing stations, crime laboratories, training academies and communication towers, representing over one million square feet of facility space. In the 2009-11 Biennium, the WSP received approximately $2 million in Minor Works capital funding to repair or enhance facilities. This included critical replacement of commercial vehicle scales at weigh stations, roof replacement at the Shelton Training Academy, electrical upgrades, drive course repairs, and replacement of a communication tower site. Additionally, the WSP received funding to complete its portion of the Shelton Wastewater Treatment Plant, which will eventually service the Shelton Training Academy for sewer and reclaimed water needs. A majority of Washington State Patrol’s capital expenditures are funded through the State Patrol Highway Account (SPHA). Capital projects for the Fire Training Academy and the agency’s crime laboratories are funded through the State Building Construction Account. We have traditionally requested minimal capital funding to address only the most critical needs due to the limited fund balances available in the State Patrol Highway Account. In preparation for the 2011-13 Biennium budget request, the Washington State Patrol Property Management Division prepared a detailed analysis of the most critical unmet capital needs within the agency. This resulted in a prioritized list of capital projects totaling nearly $10 million in short-term needs. Due to the limited available funds within the State Patrol Highway Account, a select number of the highest need projects were identified for inclusion in the budget request while other critical projects must be delayed. Projects to be included in the 2011-13 Capital Budget request include: State Patrol Highway Account:

• Septic lift station replacement at Burlington detachment due to expected failure and replacement of the water treatment system at Stanwood/Bryant weigh station due to extreme sediment in plumbing fixtures.

• Emergency back-up system (generator) at the WSP Bellevue district office and Information Technology Division to ensure continuous power supply upon loss of commercial power to maintain 911 communication capabilities and other critical system needs.

• Chiller replacement for primary cooling systems that support the agency’s server systems and prevent overheating.

• Roof replacements at Kelso, Ellensburg, Ephrata and Hoquiam detachments.



• Converting our radio system to Digital P25 operation. The Washington State Patrol VHF communication and dispatch system currently operates in wide-band (25kHz) analog mode. The Federal Communication Commission has mandated that all Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) systems operate in narrowband (12.5kHz) mode effective January 1, 2013.

• Construction of on-site sewer system at the Shelton Training Academy to connect to the Shelton Wastewater Treatment Plant, thereby decommissioning the current septic systems and drain fields. This will include incorporation of reclaimed water at the Shelton Training Academy.

• Extend the city of Shelton’s water line to the Shelton Training Academy to provide potable water and fire flow for campus and subsequent decommissioning of existing limited capacity well.

• Construct a sewer system for the Shelton Academy and connect to the regional sewer system.

State Building Construction Account:

• Fire Training Academy storm water pond remediation to ensure compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This may include pond dredging or water treatment.

• Fire Training Academy master plan to identify changes in environmental and regulatory requirements within that region and to assist in development of future modifications or enhancements to the campus.

• Vancouver Crime Laboratory Heating/Ventilation/Air Conditioning (HVAC) modification to correct a current deficiency which causes freezing of coils during periods of extended cold or freezing temperatures and creates flooding.

Additional critical projects that may not be included in the 2011-13 Biennium request due to limited SPHA funding include:

• Commercial Vehicle Truck Enforcement Scale Improvements: Existing static scales at Vernita, Deer Park, South Pasco, Home Valley and other weigh stations no longer meet the needs of the trucking industry or commercial vehicle enforcement. The scales are at risk of being decommissioned because significant repairs are needed to calibrate and recertify the scales. The scales have experienced deterioration due to higher weight of commercial vehicles.

• Communication tower replacements at Squak Mountain and Galbraith due to tower overloading and deterioration.

• Shelton Training Academy potable water pipes retrofit due to corrosion of aging water pipes and safety improvements throughout the campus.

• Statewide evidence room ventilation modifications due to drug and evidence odors.

• Carpet replacement at critical facilities where safety hazards exist and appearance has significantly deteriorated.

• Paving repairs at existing facilities due to weather and usage. • Energy system upgrades in Ellensburg and Ephrata detachments to minimize

HVAC system issues and reduce energy costs.



• Window and thermo upgrades at several existing facilities to reduce energy costs and increase insulation in existing facilities.

• Shelton Training Academy master plan which will be used to determine long term needs for Academy and the additional 200 acres secured in 2007-09 Biennium.

• Facility security enhancements throughout state, including re-coring an aging lock system that spans over 25 years to ensure security of law enforcement buildings, equipment and systems.

• Communication site electrical grounding at approximately 60 sites that currently have substandard grounding and are susceptible to lighting strikes.

We continue to share a strong partnership with the Department of Transportation regarding commercial vehicle enforcement and the two agencies are working together to determine long term static scale and Weigh-In-Motion (in-road weighing system) needs which may be included in a future capital budget request.



Washington State Patrol Data Processing Issues

The Washington State Patrol (WSP) has several major information technology related systems that it hopes to bring on line in the 2011-2013 Biennium, provided adequate funding is appropriated for the following endeavors:

P25 communications upgrade (Narrowbanding) The WSP VHF communication and dispatch system currently operates in wide-band (25 kHz) analog mode. The Federal Communication Commission has mandated that all Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) systems operate in narrowband (12.5 kHz) mode effective January 1, 2013. Changing operation of the system from wide-band to narrow-band operation in analog mode will result in a considerable loss of radio coverage. The Washington State Patrol proposes to address this issue and meet the federally mandated deadline by converting the radio system to Digital P25 operation. If funding is provided, we will replace obsolete dispatching equipment, end of life mobile and portable radios, and upgrade existing mountain top radio equipment. This solution addresses public safety communications needs and aids interoperability between standards based communications systems used by federal, state, and local first responders.

Mobile Office Platform We are requesting funding to provide the equipment and personnel required for the expansion and continued support of the agency’s mobile office platform. The Mobile Office Platform (MOP) extends office technology to the patrol car which greatly improves efficiency and that directly impacts public safety. Currently the MOP includes vehicles equipped with the Statewide Electronic Ticket and Online Reporting (SECTOR) application for producing electronic tickets and collision reports much more quickly and efficiently than via paper based methods and the In Vehicle Digital Video (IVDV) equipment for recording an officer’s encounters with violators which proves invaluable when a record of exactly what happens at a traffic stop becomes necessary. The Mobile Office Platform also includes vehicles equipped with an aging criminal history query tool that allows for roadside criminal history searches. This effort will expand the program to tie in more office related technologies to further improve efficiencies, expand the number of patrol cars which benefit from these technologies, and provide the needed resources for continued support of the program to include the ongoing replacement of aging laptops and digital video systems and additional personnel for maintenance and support.



Fingerprint Record Conversion Funding is requested to convert approximately 700,000 of the 1.6 million fingerprint records maintained by the Washington State Patrol’s Criminal History Section to a modern electronic format. Currently, these records are stored in a proprietary format that is not compatible with standards put forward by the Western Identification Network (WIN) in which the WSP belongs. Without this conversion, these records are inaccessible to many public safety agencies who can only retrieve fingerprint records which are stored in a modern standard format.

Microfilm Equipment Replacement Project (Feasibility Study) This budget proposal requests funding to conduct a feasibility study on the replacement of the aging document storage and retrieval system in use by the WSP Criminal Records Section which currently processes 42,000 records each month. The microfilm system currently in use is near the end of its useful life and repairs to it are increasingly difficult since the system is no longer manufactured. This study will provide valuable information on the best technology and approach to use for such a replacement and will be focused at an enterprise level as many Washington State Patrol business areas have similar record storage and retrieval needs. Without this, the Criminal Records Section will eventually be unable to properly archive these records which make this information less accessible to the public safety agencies that need it.




Fuel Funding Background Washington State Patrol (WSP) manages a fleet of 1,546 vehicles, of which 836 are pursuit vehicles used primarily for highway law enforcement. The remaining vehicles include specialty vehicles (bomb, detective, pool, facility and communication maintenance, rapid deployment, crime scene, and others). Approximately 89 percent of the Washington State Patrol’s fuel is provided by the Washington Department of Transportation (WDOT), which is purchased in bulk at a reduced rate. The remaining 11 percent of our fuel is purchased commercially due to areas not serviced by WDOT fuel islands and some specialty fuel needs. We monitor both WDOT and commercial fuel prices on a monthly basis to ensure that WDOT fuel is maximized and fuel usage remains within our allotment. The average WDOT fuel price between June 2009 and June 2010, was $2.60 per gallon, compared to commercial vendor fuel averaged at $2.78 for the same timeframe. A majority of the pursuit vehicles are currently Ford Crown Victoria models, which are pursuit-rated vehicles that can withstand high-speed pursuits and rapid acceleration during enforcement actions. These vehicles are purchased from a state contract and provide the troopers a safe vehicle in which to perform their enforcement activities. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rating for fuel usage by a Crown Victoria is 12 miles per gallon in the city and 21 miles per gallon on the highway. This EPA rating is based on non-law enforcement use; therefore, WSP experiences approximately 86 percent of the EPA city rating and 58 percent of the highway rating. This is attributed to the rapid acceleration for highway/freeway enforcement, pursuit driving, and additional weight of the law enforcement equipment installed in each vehicle. Our pursuit vehicles represent nearly 67 percent of the total fuel usage. Fuel Reduction Strategies: The Washington State Patrol, like other state agencies, is required to reduce fuel consumption by five percent under the Governor’s directive. We are closely monitoring fuel usage for both pursuit and non-pursuit vehicles to determine how consumption can be reduced. We are committed to utilize fuel efficient vehicles to the extent possible. Many of our non-enforcement vehicles were previously pursuit vehicles that were taken out of pursuit service and repurposed as a pool or specialty vehicle. This has saved money for the WSP and has been a widely accepted and successful practice. However, this does not help us reduce fuel consumption as we are not purchasing new, fuel efficient vehicles for these activities. Therefore, all non-enforcement vehicles upon replacement are scrutinized to determine whether a hybrid option can be purchased. We currently have five hybrid vehicles in our fleet that are utilized for non-enforcement activities.



We have also purchased over 300 “flex fuel” E85 compatible pursuit vehicles. This allows E85 fuel (85 percent ethanol/15 percent gasoline, which is a much cleaner burning fuel) to be utilized in place of traditional unleaded fuel (which may have 10 percent ethanol/90 percent gasoline). We are building this capability ahead of available infrastructure as there are currently only 15 publicly available E85 fuel stations in the state of Washington. As this infrastructure grows, we will be able to utilize this cleaner burning fuel in our pursuit vehicles. In preparation for E85 capabilities, the WSP is beginning an E85 “flex fuel” pilot project with a limited number of vehicles in the Chehalis area. We will study the fuel consumption rate realized through implementation of E85 fueled pursuit vehicles and any mechanical or operational effects of solely utilizing this type of fuel. The E85 fuel is currently approximately 26 percent cheaper than traditional gasoline, but this fluctuates by fuel station. Conversely, it is reported that the clean-burning E85 fuel requires approximately 20-30 percent additional gallons as compared to regular unleaded. Results from our E85 study are expected in April 2011. The Washington State Patrol is also piloting a new technology that is designed to reduce “ghost miles” that occur when vehicles idle. By implementing this technology, which serves as a supplemental battery in patrol cars, it is hoped that the power draw required for the law enforcement equipment in pursuit vehicles can come from the anti-idling technology rather than the main battery which requires the vehicle to remain running at all times. This pilot project is expected to begin in September 2010, with preliminary results on gallons of fuel saved and expected emissions reductions by May 2011.