1 surface course 2015 - meis

79
Surface analysis with ion beams Two parts: Surface structure determinations Thin film analysis L. C. Feldman, J. W. Mayer and S. T. Picraux, Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling, Academic Press (1982) L. C. Feldman and J. W. Mayer, Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, North-Holland (1986) I. Stensgaard, Surface studies with high-energy ion beams. Reports on Progress in Physics 55 989-1033 (1992). H. Niehus, W. Heiland and E. TagIauer, Low-energy ion scattering at surfaces. Surface Science Reports 17 (1993) 213-303. J.F. van der Veen, Ion beam crystallography of surfaces and interfaces. Surface Science Reports 5 199-288 (1985). R. Hellborg, H. J. Whitlow and Y. Zhang, Ion Beams in Nanoscience and Technology, Springer (2009)

Upload: alesol2

Post on 30-Sep-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

first lecture

TRANSCRIPT

  • Surface analysis with ion beams

    Two parts: Surface structure determinations Thin film analysis L. C. Feldman, J. W. Mayer and S. T. Picraux, Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling, Academic Press (1982) L. C. Feldman and J. W. Mayer, Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, North-Holland (1986) I. Stensgaard, Surface studies with high-energy ion beams. Reports on Progress in Physics 55 989-1033 (1992). H. Niehus, W. Heiland and E. TagIauer, Low-energy ion scattering at surfaces. Surface Science Reports 17 (1993) 213-303. J.F. van der Veen, Ion beam crystallography of surfaces and interfaces. Surface Science Reports 5 199-288 (1985). R. Hellborg, H. J. Whitlow and Y. Zhang, Ion Beams in Nanoscience and Technology, Springer (2009)

  • Ion backscattering for materials analysis: 3 energy regimes

    Low energy ion scattering (~10 keV or less): LEIS

    Hard to quantify, very surface specific

    Medium energy (~ 50 200 keV)

    Quantitative, somewhat elaborate equipment, surface specific

    High energy (1 2 MeV)

    Quantitative, simpler equipment

  • Advantages of ion beams*

    Penetrating (can access buried interfaces!)

    Mass specific

    Known interaction law (cross sections are known)

    Excellent depth resolution

    *High and medium energy beams

  • Elementary considerations in ion backscattering (1)

    k = the kinematic factor

    Relation between incoming and backscattered ion energies

    Cross section for backscattering

  • Elementary considerations in ion backscattering (2)

    Depth profiling

  • Now on to more detailed structural work using Medium Energy Ion Scattering (MEIS)!!

  • 7

    MEIS lab at Rutgers

    ALD XPS

    XPS

    IR

    NRP

    MEIS

  • Electrostatic ion detector

    8 Angle

    Ener

    gy

    ~20

    Depth resolution of ~3 near surface Angular resolution 0.2 Mass-sensitive: E = E(M, ) Quantitative (cross sections are known)

    Al

    18O

    16O

  • From the Ion beam analysis laboratory at Kyoto university; note the magnetic spectrometer.

  • The Kyoto Kobelco very compact MEIS facility

    Footprint:

    ~ 2.1 x 1.5 m

  • 3D-MEIS Pulsed ion beam

    Scattered (and/or recoiled) particles are detected

    periodic atomic structure sample

    New development: 3D-MEIS

    S. Shimoda and T. Kobayashi

    incident beam Ion : He+ Energy : 100 keV Repetition : 500 kHz

    x

    TOF

    wide solid angle

    2D blocking pattern flight times of scattered (and/or recoiled) particles

    3D detector position-sensitive and time-resolving MCP detector

  • 64

    2

    0

    -2

    -4

    42403836343230282624222018Scattered angle 2()

    [110][331]

    f-1 f-2 f-3 f-4

    35.3

    Si

    22.0

    Angle

    fro

    m the S

    i(110) pla

    ne ()

    1 = 67.2 1 = 62.2 1 = 57.2 1 = 52.2

    6

    4

    2

    0

    -2

    -4

    42403836343230282624222018Scattered angle 2()

    f-1 f-2 f-3 f-4

    b-1 b-2 b-3

    22.3 28.8 39.3

    Er

    Angle

    fro

    m the S

    i(110) pla

    ne ()

    [0111][0223][0112]

    1 = 67.2 1 = 62.2 1 = 57.2 1 = 52.2

    Structural analysis of an Er-silicide on Si(111) substrate using 3D-MEIS

    Fig. 3 Structural model of the ErSi2

    Cross section cut by the ErSi2(2110) plane

    __ Fig.1 3D-MEIS images of the intensities of He particles scattered (a) from Er atoms in the Er-silicide film and (b) from Si atoms in the Si substrate.

    Fig. 2 TOF spectra obtained from the data detected in regions indicated by A and B in Fig.1.

    (2110) __

    A

    B

    (a)

    (b)

    S. Shimoda and T. Kobayashi

    c

    a2a1

    B

    A

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Inte

    nsi

    ty (co

    unts

    )

    360340320300280260

    TOF (ns)

    A

    B

    Er

    Si

    Er Si

    b-1

    b-2

    b-3

    c=0.403nm

    b-1 : [0112]

    b-2 : [0223]

    b-3 : [0111]

    _

    _

    3a=0.665nm

  • Surface structure and dynamics

    N

    i i

    i

    calc

    i

    Y

    YY

    NR

    1

    2

    exp

    exp1

    100

    -5 0 5 10 15

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    50.6000

    0.8200

    1.040

    1.260

    1.480

    1.700

    1.920

    2.140

    2.360

    2.580

    2.800

    3.020

    3.240

    3.400(a)

    d

    12 (%

    )

    d23

    (%)

    blocking cone

    shadow cone

    Monte Carlo simulation in the

    binary-encounter approximation

    Input:

    individual atomic positions

    anisotropic rms vibration amplitude

    Output:

    d

    12

    d

    23

    50 60 70 80 90 1001101201302

    4

    6

    8

    10

    [211] [110] [011][011][011][101]

    II IIII

    Yie

    ld (M

    L)

    Scattering angle (deg)

  • An (oversimplified) picture of the origin of the oscillatory relaxation

  • Reconstruction of the (110) surface of Au:

    Possible structural models consistent with a (1x2) symmetry

  • Conclusions:

    Missing row structure

    Large first layer inwards contraction

    Buckling in the lower layers, results in charge density smoothing

  • Another research example: Surface structure of TiC(001)

    Y. Kido et al, PRB 61 1748 (2000)

  • The angular shifts from the first and second layers are displaced in opposite directions!

    Surface relaxation and rumpling!

  • Melting of Pb(110) Frenken et al PRB 74, 7506 (1986)

  • Melting starts at the surface Partial disorder already at ~ Tm

    bulk

    At Tm 20 the top layer is disordered The thickness of the disordered layer diverges logarithmically

  • Gate oxide

    Barrier?

    Gate

    Source Drain Silicon

    CMOS Gate Structure

    >10nm

    The SiO2/Si system: interface of choice in microelectronics for

    40+ years

    Moores law says that the

    gateoxide thickness will soon be

    too small (~ 1 nm) due to large

    leakage currents from quantum

    mechanical tunneling

    Motivation for a lot of work in this field today

    SiO2 needs to be replaced by a higher dielectric constant material (high-k)

  • II. Nuclear Resonance Profiling - a light projectile (proton) penetrates the nucleus and induces a nuclear reaction; the reaction product ( or ) is detected.

  • 106

    0

    105

    104

    103

    102

    101

    100

    10-1

    10-2

    10-3

    10-4

    10-5

    100 200 400300 500 600 700 800 900

    95

    151

    216

    334

    629 73084618 15

    O(p, ) N

    Seo d

    e c

    hoqu

    e d

    ifere

    nci

    al (

    b/s

    r)

    Energia (keV)

    Resonant nuclear reactions

    18O 15N p

    Reaction cross section (b/sr) vs. proton energy (keV)

  • 106

    0

    105

    104

    103

    102

    101

    100

    10-1

    10-2

    10-3

    10-4

    10-5

    100 200 400300 500 600 700 800 900

    95

    151

    216

    334

    629 73084618 15

    O(p, ) N

    Seo d

    e c

    hoqu

    e d

    ifere

    nci

    al (

    b/s

    r)

    Energia (keV)

    Resonant nuclear reactions

    p

    E E r

    mylar (13 m)detector

    semicondut or

    amost ra

    detector (BGO)

    p,

    (a)

    (b)raios

    Reaction cross section (b/sr) vs. proton energy (keV)

  • 106

    0

    105

    104

    103

    102

    101

    100

    10-1

    10-2

    10-3

    10-4

    10-5

    100 200 400300 500 600 700 800 900

    95

    151

    216

    334

    629 73084618 15

    O(p, ) N

    Seo d

    e c

    hoqu

    e d

    ifere

    nci

    al (

    b/s

    r)

    Energia (keV)

    ER

    ER

    ER

    E (> E )2 1

    E1

    Amostra

    Resonant nuclear reactions

    Reaction cross section (b/sr) vs. proton energy (keV)

  • Some low energy nuclear resonances

  • Examples

    0 2 4 6 8 10 120

    1

    429 431 433Energia dos Prtons (keV)

    15N(p,)

    12C

    Re

    nd

    ime

    nto

    (u

    .a.)

    Profundidade (nm)

    15N

    (10

    19.c

    m-3)

    0 2 4 6 8 10 120

    1

    429 431 433

    15N(p,)

    12C

    Proton Energy (keV)

    Re

    nd

    ime

    nto

    (u

    .a.)

    Profundidade (nm)

    15N

    (10

    19.c

    m-3)

    15N profile

    As prepared Vacuum annealed

    15N 15N

    Depth (nm) Depth (nm)

  • Nuclear resonance depth profiling of Al2O3 on Si(100)

    (Baumvol et al., Porto Alegre)

    Overlapping peaks in MEIS spectrum (M. Copel et al., IBM)

  • Some advantages of NRP:

    Detects only one specie at a time

    Very well suited for analysis of light elements

    Some disadvantages of NRP: Detects only one specie at a time

    If no suitable resonance exists

  • III. Medium Energy Ion Scattering (MEIS) - a low-energy, high resolution version of conventional Rutherford Backscattering (RBS)

  • A comparison between RBS and MEIS

    RBS MEIS

    Ion energy ~ 2 MeV ~ 100 keV

    Detector resolution ~ 15 keV ~0.15 keV

    Depth resolution ~ 100 ~ 3

    2 basic advantages vs. RBS: Often better dE/dx, superior detection equipment

  • Energy Dependence of dE/dx for Protons in Silicon

    Maximum of ~ 14 eV/ at ~ 100 keV!

    This helps, but the greater advantage is the use of better ion detection equipment!

    Energy (MeV)

  • K. Kimura et al. (Kyoto) NIM B99, 472 (1995)

    Early High Resolution Work

    Sb on Si(100) with caps of varying thickness; some Sb segregates to the surface

  • Determining interface strain using monolayer resolution ion scattering and blocking (Moon et al.)

    Ozone oxide, no strain

    Thermally grown oxide, significant strain

  • ZrO

    2 (ZrO2)x(SiO2)y

    Si(100)

    100 keV p+ Backscattered proton energy spectrum

    depth

    profile

    Sensitivity: 10+12 atoms/cm2 (Hf, Zr) 10+14 atoms/cm2 (C, N)

    Accuracy for determining total amounts: 5% absolute (Hf, Zr, O), 2% relative 10% absolute (C, N)

    Depth resolution: (need density) 3 near surface 8 at depth of 40

    ?

    Spectra and information content

  • Depth resolution for 100 keV protons (resolution of the spectrometer 150 eV)

    Stopping power SiO2 12 eV/; Si3N4 20 eV/; Ta2O5 18 eV/

    "Near surface" depth resolution 3-5 ; worse for deeper layers due to energy straggling

    Depth resolution and concentration profiling

    Layer model:

    raw spectrum

    5

    4

    3 21

    layer numbers

    Energy, keV3

    H+

    SUBSTRATE

    Layer 1

    Layer 2

    Layer 3

    .

    Layer n

    Areas under each peak corresponds to the concentration

    of the element in a 3 slab

    Peak shapes and positions come from energy loss, energy

    straggling and instrumental

    resolution.

    The sum of the contributions of the different layers describes the

    depth profile.

  • 1. O18 uptake at the surface!

    2. Growth at the interface

    3. O16 loss at the surface

    4. O16 movement at the interface!

    Oxygen Isotope Experiments: SiO2 growth mode

    Gusev, Lu, Gustafsson, Garfunkel, PRB 52, 1759 (1995)

  • Schematic model

    SiO2

    Transition zone,

    SiOx

    Si (crystalline)

    Surface exchange

    Growth

    Deal and Grove

  • 75 80 85 90 95

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20 (3)(2)(1)

    (1) as deposited film

    (2) vacuum anneal at 600 oC

    (3) vacuum anneal at 800 oC

    no change in

    O or Si profiles

    minor rearrangement

    of La upon annealing

    high-K La-Si-O film

    yie

    ld (

    a.u

    .)

    proton energy (keV)

    Annealing up to 800 C in vacuum shows no significant change in MEIS spectra.

    Surface remains flat by AFM.

    Work on high-k films: MEIS spectra of La2SiO5 before and after vacuum anneal

  • 75 80 85 90 95

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25high-K La-Si-O film

    (3)

    (2)

    (1)

    (3)

    (2)(1)

    SiO

    surfsurf intint

    La

    surfint

    (1) as deposited film

    (2) anneal in air at 400 oC

    (3) anneal in air at 800 oC

    La diffusionSiO2 growth at 800

    oC

    yie

    ld (

    a.u

    .)

    proton energy (keV)

    stoichiometry and thickness consistent with other analyses

    400C anneal leads to minor broadening of the La, O and Si

    distributions

    800C anneal shows significant SiO2 growth at interface

    La diffusion towards the Si substrate

    La2SiO5 before and after in-air anneal

    MOx

    Si

    MOx

    Si

    SiO2+MOx + O2

  • Higher temperature annealing

    75 80 85 90 95

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    high-K La-Si-O film

    (1) as deposited film

    (2) vacuum anneal at 845 oC

    (3) vacuum anneal at 860 oC

    (3)

    (2)

    (1)

    La diffusion

    surface Si

    loss of O at 860 oC

    yie

    ld (

    a.u

    .)

    proton energy (keV)

    The film disintegrates!

  • ZrO2 film re-oxidized in 18O2

    76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 960

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    x518

    O

    16O

    Si

    Zr

    as-deposited film

    18

    O2 reox. (1 Torr, 500

    oC, 5 min)

    Yie

    ld (

    a.u

    .)

    Proton Energy (keV)

    No change in Zr profile

    Surface flat by AFM Deeper O and Si

    Significant interfacial SiO2 growth for ZrO2, less for Al2O3

    Dramatic oxygen exchange: 18O incorporation and 16O removal

    SiO2 growth rate faster than for O2 on Si Growth faster under ZrO2 than Al2O3

    76 78 80 82 84 86 88

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    700 oC

    600 oC

    500 oC

    400 oC

    Si interfaceoxygen exchange Al

    18O

    16O

    MEIS spectra of 30 Al2O

    3 annealed in

    3 Torr 18

    O2 at 400, 500, 600, 700

    oC for 5 min

    yie

    ld (

    a.u

    .)

    proton energy (keV)

    30 Al2O3 annealed in

    3 Torr 18O2

    0 200 400 600 800 10000

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30 ZrO2

    30 Al2O

    3

    SiO

    2 G

    row

    th (

    )

    O2 Anneal Temp (

    oC)

  • Epitaxial Oxides

    Very versatile materials:

    Small changes in composition big changes in properties (high-Tc!)

    Combining two different oxides may give multifunctionality and/or entirely new phenomena.

    49

    Oxides

  • 50

    Metallic LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (LAO/STO) interface

    LaAlO3 (Eg = 5.8 eV) by PLD or MBE band insulator

    SrTiO3 (Eg = 3.2 eV) band insulator

    2D Electron Gas

    Metallic conductivity Ohtomo & Hwang, Nature (2004)

    Superconductivity Reyren et al, Science (2007)

    Magnetic order Brinkman et al, Nat. Mat. (2007)

    Reyren et al., Science (2007) Brinkman et al., Nat. Mat. (2007) Ohtomo & Hwang, Nature (2004)

    T(K)

  • Origin of metallic state at the interface

    51

    Polar catastrophe: polar-nonpolar discontinuity Ohtomo &Hwang, Nature 427 (2004)

    This model assumes an abrupt interface

  • 52

    Important points

    Cationic interdiffusion Nakagawa et al, Nature 5 (2006), Kalabukhov et al, PRL 103 (2009); Willmott et al, PRL 99 (2007).

    Oxygen vacancies have been shown by many to influence carrier concentrations

    Conductivity only observed on TiO2 terminated substrates

  • Samples

    We have investigated samples from three different labs.

    None of the samples were made at Rutgers.

    All made by PLD on TiO2 terminated substrates.

    Post-annealed in oxygen.

    Most data presented today from samples by Prof. H. Hwang, Tokyo (now Stanford).

    53

  • 54

    He+ channeling spectrum of 4-unit-cell LAO/STO(001)

    The measured Sr and Ti peaks fall

    at significantly higher ion energies

    than those calculated for a sharp

    interface:

    The energies for the Sr and Ti

    peaks are those of both species

    present within the outermost u.c.

    of LAO outdiffusion of Sr and Ti to the LAO film

    4 u.c. LAO

    STO (001)

    198.6 KeV He+ [001] [111]

    rastering beam

    140 150 160 170 180

    0

    50

    100

    150

    Co

    un

    ts

    He+

    Energy [keV]

    Experiment

    Simulation-no outdiffusion

    of Sr and Ti

    x4

    Sr

    Ti

    LaTokyo-LO4

  • 55

    85 90 95

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    H+ Energy [keV]

    Experiment

    Simulation-no outdiffusion of Sr and Ti

    Yie

    ld

    Tokyo-MID4 La

    SrTi

    Al

    H+ channeling spectrum of a 4-unit-cell LAO/STO film

  • 56

    85 90 95

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    Experiment

    Simulation-no outdiffusion of Sr and Ti

    Yie

    ld

    H+ Energy [keV]

    Al

    Ti Sr

    LaAugsburg

    H+ channeling spectrum of a 4-unit-cell LAO/STO film

  • 57

    Angle dependent XPS shows poor agreement with sharp interface model (Chambers et al)

  • 58

    The LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface shows evidence for substantial interdiffusion, a useful result for understanding the origin of the many interesting effects shown by this system. More details: Surf. Sci. Rep. 65, 317 (2010)

    Conclusions

  • A novel instrument for surface structure studies using energetic ion beams: the Helium Ion Microscope - HIM

  • Ion source

    Diffraction in He microscope and in SEEM

  • Advantages

    Very high source brightness

    Large depth of view

    Very small beam spot

    High secondary electron yield allowing currents as low as 1 fA (typically 0.2 pA).

    Topographic, material, crystallographic, and electrical properties sampled.

    Great for insulators

    Does not rely on sample periodicity

    Little sample damage due to relatively light mass of the helium ion (but ).

  • Overview of the Helium Ion Microscope

    FOV: 200 nm

    Sample: Asbestos fiber (crocidolite)

    and carbon membrane FOV: 300 nm

    Single Walled Carbon Nanotube

    Imaging mechanism (so far): Secondary electrons

  • Why is Helium So Different?

  • Case Study: Imaging Structures in the Inner Ear

    Three areas were studied, with the goal of obtaining direct observation and/or measurement of nano-scale structures that are related to the functioning of the ear.

    Tectorial Membrane: structure and layout of collagen fibers.

    Stereocilia, (sound transducers) including

    The nature of their membranes

    The tip links, which connect the tips of stereocilia in adjacent rows in their bundles

    Otoconia: nanostructure of the calcite-containing minerals employed in the ear for balance.

    Observe these in HIM without usual staining (OTOTO method) and conductive coating.

  • Helium Ion Microscope: What is there beyond imaging?

    Lithography with a helium beam Beam chemistry with a helium beam Implantation of helium atoms Milling, drilling with a helium beam Analysis with a helium beam

  • Ion beam milling of graphene

  • SECONDARY ION MASS SPECTROSCOPY

    SIMS

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)

  • Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis, L.C. Feldman and J.W. Mayer, North Holland-Elsevier, N.Y. (1986)