8 - 10 medium size full arch trays depending on the user

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyApplications per Foil Bag (360mL)

Polymer with vinyl terminal groups Mineral fillers Synthetic fillers Platinum complex Crosslinker Surfactant Pigments

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Chemistry

Impressions may be poured 30 minutes after disinfection Impressions made with 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Garant™

HB/LB Impression material may be poured immediately after

disinfection

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyModel Pouring

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Impression Material

3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Penta™ HB

1:5 catalyst/base ratio 3M™ ESPE™ Pentamix™ mixing

unit Mauve color More putty-like resistance during

tray seating

3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Garant™ HB

1:1 catalyst/base ratio 3M™ ESPE™ Garant™

dispenser Purple color

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyWhat are Some Differences?

Crown and bridge impressions

Inlay/onlay impressions

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Indications

Rated by 85% of dentists as the same as or better than current* Dentist satisfaction rating of 90%* Easy to remove final impression with excellent final fit and detail

reproduction Putty-like resistance when seating the tray 3M™ ESPE™ Pentamix™ mixing unit dispenses fast and easy with push

button activation Void-free and homogenous mix when used with the 3M™ ESPE™

Pentamix™ mixing unit

*April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc.

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Features

Does not drip or slump Hydrophilic Acceptable final set rigidity Room-temperature working time of two minutes Four-minute setting time 30-minute minimum stone model pour time

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Features (continued)

Easy to remove final impression with excellent final fit and detail reproduction

Putty-like resistance when seating the tray

Hydrophilic and no-drip properties

*April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc.

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyTop 3 Features*

Mixed consistency, mm 31.5 30 30 30

Strain in compression (%) 2.9 2.0 – 2.5 1.4 1.3

Working time @ 73° F, minutes 2:00 2:15 2:15 2:30

Setting time, minutes 4:00 5:00 3:15 3:30 – 5:00

Mix tip waste, ml 6.4 4.5 4.5 6.4

Shore A hardness after 15 mins. 57 65 72 76 - after 1 hour 57 66 72 76 - after 24 hours 62 69 72 79

3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Caulk DMG KulzerPenta™ Aquasil Honigum® Flexitime Heavy Body DECA Heavy Magnum 360 H

Heavy

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Competitive Comparison

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body Mixed Consistency

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyOne Step/Two Viscosity TechniqueWorking and Setting Time Recommendations

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyStrain in Compression

This slide series illustrates an anterior case using 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body impression material with the 3M™ ESPE™ Pentamix™ mixing unit and 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Garant™ light body impression material. This clinical case was made courtesy of Timothy F. Kosinski, D.D.S.

Dr. Kosinski currently practices esthetic and implant dentisty and is an Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor; Department of Stomatology Section of Oral Medicine, University of Detroit School of Dentistry.

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyIntroduction

Delivers consistent, homogeneous, void-free mix

Dispenses fast and easy with push button activation

Hygienic and reduces the risk of cross-contamination

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

*April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc.

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyPentamix™ Mixing Unit - Top 3 Features*

Slide 1 - Removed fractured post. Tooth fracture at tissue crest.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 2 - Final prepared tooth. Tissue retracted using 0a Gingibraid and #2 Z twistGingi-Plain. Ready for placement of plastic para-post and impression material.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 3 - Plastic para-post positioned in root canal. 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Garant™ Light Body Impression Material injected around preparation.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 4 - Dispensing 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Penta™ heavy body impression material into a stock anterior tray.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 5 - Final pick up impression of the para-post.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 6 - Cast post & core on model.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 7 - Cast post & core cemented.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

Slide 8 - Final porcelain fused to metal crown.

Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy Body

90% were satisfied or very satisfied with 3M™ ESPE™ Imprint™ II Penta™ heavy body impression material.

85 % rated the Imprint™ II Penta™ heavy body material as the same or better than their current heavy body material.

• April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. 38% Imprint II Users, 36% Dimension™ Penta H users, and 26% competitive users

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyClinical ResultsImprint™ II Penta™ heavy body impression material field evaluation 2002*

“Creamy mix, with no slumping and a nice color. A good material.” “No defects, good detail and easy to read.” “Handling is easier, dispensing is easier. The self-puncture feature of

each bag is a huge improvement over my current material.” “Better incorporation of heavy and light body material with less

voids.”

*April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc.

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyEvaluator’s CommentsImprint™ II Penta™ heavy body impression material field evaluation 2002*

Imprint™ II Penta™ Heavy BodyIntro Kit