soc 319: sociological approaches to social psychology thursday february 26, 2009 attribution theory...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Soc 319: Sociological Approaches to Social Psychology
Thursday February 26, 2009
Attribution Theory (cont’d)
& Attitudes
I. Attribution Theory
A. What is It?1. Naïve scientist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImCQNq8rtWc&feature=related
B. Dispositional vs. Situational Attributions1. Subtractive Rule
C. Covariation Principle (Kelley)1. Three sources of behavior
a. Actorb. Objectc. Context
C. Kelly Covariation (cont’d)
2. Sources of information for making attribution
a. Consensus
b. Consistency
c. Distinctiveness
3. Examples
Kelley’s Cube (e.g., McArthur, 1972)
Consensus Distinctiveness Consistency Attribution
Low
Few people laughed
Low
Mary laughs at everyone
High
Mary always laughs at Joe
Actor (86%)The laughter is due to traits of Mary.
High
Everyone laughed
High
Mary rarely
laughs
High
Mary always laughs at Joe
Object (61%)The laughter is due to Joe’s comedic skills.
Low
Few people laughed
High
Mary rarely
laughs
Low
Mary rarely laughs at Joe
Context (72%) The laughter reflects time/place.
Is Joe the Comedian funny? Is Mary easily amused? Or is tonight a special event?
D. Sources of Bias in Making Attributions
1. Correspondence bias (Jones 1979)
a. Explanations
2. Actor-observer effect (“You fell, I was pushed”)
a. Explanations
3. Self-serving bias (“I’m good, you’re lucky”)
a. Explanations
E. Attributions for Success and Failure
1. Dimensionsa. Locus of controlb. Stability
2. Combinationsa. Internal/stable = Ability (your ability at logic & reasoning)b. Internal/unstable = Effort (how many hours you studied the LSAT guide)c. External/stable = Task difficulty (how difficult the test is)d. External/unstable = Luck
Attributions for Success and Failure
Locus of Control
Internal External
Stable Ability Task difficulty
Unstable Effort Luck
Source: Weiner et al., 1972
F. Consequences of Success & Failure Attributions1. Such attributions may affect subsequent
achievement behaviors and motivation; future achievement expectancies; persistence at similar tasks; pride or shame felt following success or failure. a. Optimistic attribution style. Negative outcomes attributed external, unstable and specific causes; and positive outcomes to internal, stable, global causes.b. Pessimistic attribution style. Negative outcomes attributed to internal, stable, and global forces. (I’m a bad person); positive events in terms of external, unstable, and specific causes.
I. Attitudes
A. Definitions1. General: “an attitude is a predisposition to
respond to a particular object in a generally favorable or unfavorable way.”
2. Tripartite approaches to attitudea. Affective: + or - evaluation (like/dislike) of
object “Cigarette smoke is smelly and disgusting.”
b. Behavioral: predisposition to respond or a behavioral tendency towards the object.
“I do not and would never smoke.”c. Cognitive: beliefs about object
“Smoking causes cancer and emphysema.”
B. Why attitudes are important
Among most “distinctive and indispensable” topics in social psych (Allport 1954).
An important indicator of social and normative change.
Early social psychological research presumed attitude towards a given object must influence actions towards that object. e.g., political polls, marketing polls, fertility aspirations.
The relationship between attitudes and behaviors varies: Strength of relationship contingent on properties of
attitude, person, and social context.
C. How we develop attitudes
1. Instrumental conditioning
a. Bennington College study (Newcomb 1943)
2. Classical conditioning
3. Observational learning
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
Fall 1935 Fall 1936 Fall 1937 Fall 1938
De
gre
e o
f P
olit
ica
l Co
ns
erv
ati
sm
Political Attitudes of Bennington College Women (Newcomb, 1943)
Presidential Election 1960
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
% Votes
Kennedy Nixon
Candidates
Other Women
Bennington
D. Measurement of Attitudes
1. Direct or self-reported measures
a. Single items
b. Likert scale
c. Semantic differential (Osgood, Suci, Tannenbaum 1975)
2. Indirect methods
a.Wrong number technique
b. Lost letter technique
Examples of self-reported attitude scales Semantic differential (evaluation, potency, activity)
“Smokers are…
Good +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 Bad
Clean +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 Dirty Likert scale: Please indicate whether you strongly
agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or disagree strongly.” “I believe that cigarette smoking should be banned
from all public places.” “Americans should be free to smoke whenever and
wherever they like.”
E. Structure of attitudes
1. Vertical structure
2. Horizontal structure
Structure of Attitudes
Primitive Belief:I follow God’s
teachings
Premarital sex leads to promiscuity.Promiscuity spreads STDs.
The Bible says premarital
sex is wrong.
Premarital sex causes pregnancy.Teen pregnancies ruin girls’ lives.
Premarital sex iswrong
Vertical Structure ↓
Horizontal Structure→
F. How Attitudes Change Over Time
1. Age effect: how one’s chronological age affects some attitude (e.g., maturation or developmental effects)
2. Cohort effect: how membership in a birth cohort affects some attitude (e.g., how boomers and Gen Xers differ)
3. Period effect: how a historical moment affects some attitude, for all people at that moment (e.g. if 2002 differs from 2000, it could be a “9-11” effect)
Are Baby Boomers really more politically liberal the Gen Xers (or Gen Y)?
Anti-war protest, 1968
Important questions to ask
Were Baby Boomers more likely than members of other birth cohorts to also protest in 1978, and 1988, and 1998…. It yes, then we would believe they are a distinct cohort.
Were most protesters in 1968 teenagers? If not, then perhaps protests were a period effect.
Are most protests in 1968, and 1978… and 2006 led by young adults? If yes, then we would say participation in protests reflects an age effect.
Approval/Disapproval of Gay Marriage (2005), by Age
top related