turn around session 3 reiger park

Post on 23-Jun-2015

536 Views

Category:

Education

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

1

Turn-Around Strategy WorkshopReigerpark Schools

Session 2 (SRC 1-3)

Presenters: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD)

2

Lead Provider:Education Moving Up

Dr Muavia GallieSARS Ref. No.: 9396/149/16/4GPG Vendor No.: 1100051797

Associate Member:Creative Learning Assessment and

School ServicesFully Accredited with the ETDP SETA - ETDP-9978

Faruk Hoosain

Coordinating Agencies:CENCE BBI

Johan Marx Lynda Titus

Your Service Providers

2

3

Content1. Introduction2. Focus on Planning;3. Project Reminders;4. Self-Assessment (GPS & SRC);5. SRC 1.1 - Teacher Attendance;6. SRC 1.2 - Learner Attendance;7. SRC 2 - Teacher Information;8. SRC 3 - Learner Information;9. Conclusion

4

How relevant is the QEdebate?

• 1,2 Mill learners in Gr1 - 0,55 mill inMatric (only 45%);

• 60% of Matrics pass examination;

• 1/3 leave with certificate worthy ofpresentation;

• Only 10% success-rate.

3

5

Success rate = 8,1%

6

Where are we now?

4

7

Striving towards QE

8

Logistics of Teaching and Learning

School ReadinessComponents

30%

Teaching40%

100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%10%20%30%

Current Academic YearPrevious Year

Learning50%

Assess-ment10%H

FSLF

SD

FS

School ReadinessComponents

30%

School ReadinessComponents

30%

Teaching30%

Teaching20%

Disrup-tions10%

Assessment20%

Learning for Assessment

20%

Learning20%

Disruptions& Chaos

20%

Learn-ing

10%

90%

50%

30%Time-on-Task

5

9

10

6

11

12

7

13

14

School Readiness Components 8

School ReadinessComponents

30%

100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%10%20%30%

Current Academic YearPrevious Year

HFS

LFS

DFS

School ReadinessComponents

30%

School ReadinessComponents

30%8. Learner and Teacher

support materials

7. Organogram

6. Quarterly Teachingschedules

5. Implementable andflexible timetable

5. Unclear academic standards

4. Annual Planning4. High level of disruption and violence

3. Learner Information3.1 Low learner performance

3.2 High dropout rates of learners

2. Teacher Information2.1 High rate of staff turnover

2.2 Negative school atmosphere

1. Teacher and LearnerAttendance

1.1 High rate of staff absenteeism

1.2 High rate of learner absenteeism

SRC ComponentIndicators of DFS

8 School Readiness Components

8

15

1. Attendance (both teachers and learners);2. Know and understand our teachers;3. Know and understand our learners;4. Do proper Annual Planning and implement;5. Have workable Timetabling and use

teachers effectively (not favouritism);6. Quarterly Teaching Schedules keeping us

accountable every day;7. Supportive Organogram for accountability;8. Teaching and Learning Support Material for

every learner and teacher on first day.

16

PPS Project

Gauteng Schools with challengesProject Manager Schools DivisionNo Grade 12 Results

20082009

Variance Up Down Same1 35 49 14 12 50 53 3 13 24 26 2 14 27 34 7 15 47 46 -1 16 46 73 27 17 26 46 20 18 29 38 9 19 38 39 1 110 48 38 -10 111 29 46 17 112 28 28 113 29 76 47 114 39 22 -17 115 48 66 18 116 29 52 23 117 33 68 35 118 30 65 35 119 12 30 18 120 27 39 12 121 30 16 -14 122 42 38 -4 123 51 46 -5 124 40 96 56 125 42 46 4 126 45 63 18 127 48 85 37 128 55 54 -1 129 55 51 -4 1

30 66 66 0 131 56 48 -8 1

Ave. 12.5 21 9 165.6% 28.1% 3.1%

Ave. 20.5 -7.1

9

17

Project Plan• Establish the ‘Eight School

Readiness Components’ inorder to allow your schools tooperate optimally during theyear – (i) Find out; (ii) Establish,and (iii) Assist withImplementation [Rules andRegulations];

18

Planning to FailFailing toPlan is thesame as

Planning toFail.

10

19

Planning (Amos and Sarchet)

• What must be done?• Who will do it?• How will it be done?• When must it be done?• How much will it cost?• What do we need to do it?

20

Levels of Planning in Education …

National

ProvincialInstitu

tionalCurriculumDistrict

1. School

2. Senior Management Team

3. Department4. Classroom

5. Learning Programme

11

21

Focus onthe

School …

22

Data Planning and Reflectiontool

The periodic, systematic use of a data, planning andreflection tool is needed to shape our decision onLearning and Teaching in schools.

September

NovemberDecember

January

March

April

May

June

October

August

February

July

12

23

• Planning: Determine which learnersneed support in which areas; be asprecise as possible to make theintervention selection more “on target.”

• Accountability: Be sure that resourcesspent on interventions are being usedwell; monitor whether or not learners aremaking substantial growth toward thetarget established.

Role of Data Management inPlanning Interventions …

24

Project Activity Plan

Working with entire staffAssist with implementingthe 8 SRC

Support session 2

Working with Principal and SMTEstablish the 8 schoolreadiness components

Support session 1

Professional Leadership (6, 8)

Management (7)

6. Quarterly TeachingSchedules

7. Organogram

8. Teaching and LearningSupport Materials

Workshop Day 221 Feb 2010(09h00 – 13h00)

Administration (1-3)

Management (4)

Professional Leadership (5)

1. Attendance,

2. Teacher Information

3. Learner Information

4. Annual Planning

5. Timetabling

Workshop Day 120 Feb 2010(09h00 – 16h00)

FocusSRCSessions

13

25

Remember: Features of the Project1. “Whatever it takes - no excuse!”2. “Failing is not an option.”3. Principal is the driver of the project - You lead by example;4. Rest of staff are ‘in support’ - Leaders develop other

leaders, not followers!;5. Networking with others - Together we are stronger - We

connect, not compete - We celebrate success together!;6. Evidence based (File of all 8 SRC at first joint session) – If

you do it, show it to us!;7. You judge/critique yourself - We learn from others!;8. Support (face-to-face; telephone; sms; e-mail) - Our

support is as near/far as you want us to be!.

26

There is noManagement

withoutMonitoring and

Evaluation

14

27

Monitoring

28

There is noLeadership

without QualityAssurance.

15

29

Quality Assurance

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

100%

• •

• • • • •• • • •

••

1413121110987654321

2009

2011

2010

30

16

31

SRC = Self-Assessment

8. Teaching and LearningSupport Materials

7. Organogram

6. Teaching Schedules

5. Timetabling

4. Annual Planning

3. Learner Information

2. Teacher Information

1.2 Learner Attendance

1.1 Teacher Attendance

Diff.5432108 School Readiness Comp.

32

SRC 1.1-Teacher

Attendance• No attendance system;• Tick next to name (✔);• Sign their names;• Indicate ‘time in & out’;• Comments from Principal;• Number of days absent, latearrival, leaving early;

• Leave form submitted (24h);• Leave form processed;

17

33

SRC 1.2 - Learner Attendance

34

SRC 2 - Teacher InformationImpactOutputProcessInput

5. Performance3. Academic4. Professional

1. Biographical2. Personal

18

35

SRC 2 - Teacher Information

36

SRC 2 - Teacher Information

19

37

SRC 2 - Teacher Information

38

SRC 3 - Learner InformationImpactOutputProcessInput

5. Achievement3. Social4. Economic

1. Biographical2. Personal

20

39

SRC 3 - Learner Information

40

SRC 3 - Learner Information

21

41

SRC 3 - Learner Information

42

Ten Untruths in Education

1. Democratic decision making in schoolscreate a conducive school tone or culture;

2. Parent involvement is crucial;3. OBE approach is resource intensive;4. Resources (computers and libraries) will

make all the difference;5. The Dept. is not supporting teachers and

therefore they are de-motivated;

22

43

Ten Untruths in Education

6. Lack of learning is caused by the ill-discipline oflearners;

7. Our classrooms are overcrowded - smallclasses will make the difference;

8. It is difficult to achieve learner success inpoverty stricken communities;

9. Learners are not at the level they should bewhen they get to our schools (no pre- or nurseryschool; can’t read and write)

10. Teacher development will solve most of ourperformance problems.

top related