anesthetic considerations in obstetric emergencies

Upload: paul-herrera

Post on 14-Apr-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    1/45

    Anesthetic Considerations in

    Obstetric EmergenciesAn Update

    Arvind Palanisamy, MD, FRCA

    Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine

    Brigham and Womens Hospital

    Harvard Medical School

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    2/45

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    3/45

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    4/45

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    5/45

    Causes of Maternal Death

    Cardiac disease

    Psychiatric disorders

    Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy Thrombo-embolic disorders

    Hemorrhage

    OBESITY

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    6/45

    Maternal Deaths Are Preventable

    40% of maternal deaths

    are preventable

    Hemorrhage related

    deaths completely

    preventable

    Berg CJ et al.Obstet Gynecol 2005 Dec 106 (6): 1228-34

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    7/45

    Preoperative Planning

    Communication

    Davies JM et.al, Anesthesiology 2009 Jan;110(1):131-9

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    8/45

    Improving Communication

    Systematic review

    8 studies 4 randomized, 4 cohort studies

    Improvement: KnowledgeCommunication

    Practical skills

    Team performanceSimulation center vs. training in local hospital?

    Merien AE et.al, Obstet Gynecol 2010 May;115(5):1021-31

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    9/45

    Number of Prior CS Risk of Placenta Accreta (%)

    0 3.3

    1 11

    2 40

    3 614+ 67

    Placenta Previa/Accreta

    Silver RM et.al, Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1226

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    10/45

    Placenta Accreta

    Mean estimated blood

    loss > 2.5 L

    > 25% require ICU

    admission1

    Risk of hysterectomy2

    - previa + scar (11%)

    - previa + accreta (66%)

    1.Eller J et.al, BJOG 2009; 116: 648-54

    2.Chattopadhyay SK et. al, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993; 52:151-6

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    11/45

    Team

    Resources

    Planning

    Maternal-fetal medicine

    Anesthesia

    Gynecologic Oncology

    Urology/Surgery

    Interventional Radiology

    NeonatologyOR

    IR suite

    L&D

    SICU

    Blood Bank

    Cell Saver

    Timed elective delivery

    Contingency plan

    Multidisciplinary Approach

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    12/45

    Preoperative Planning

    Planned between 34-36 weeks

    Betamethasone course

    Antenatal anesthesia consultation 4 PRBC, 4 FFP, 2 Platelets

    Teams notified including ICU

    Usually booked as first case

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    13/45

    Surgical Management

    Radical approach

    - Cesarean hysterectomy prophylactic IR

    Conservative approach

    - Myometrial resection + Bakri balloon

    - Placenta in situ (mostly European practice)

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    14/45

    Anesthetic Management

    GETA vs. Regional technique1

    - 350 consecutive cases of placenta previa

    - decreased EBL with regional- decreased transfusion rate with regional

    CSE + A-line

    Baseline coagulation UBBH/ Fluid warmers/ DVT prophylaxis

    1. Parekh N et. al, Br J Anaesth 2000; 84 (6): 725-30

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    15/45

    Interventional Radiology

    Prophylactic

    Therapeutic

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    16/45

    Interventional Radiology

    Which artery?

    - uterine or vaginal artery

    - empiric uterine artery embolotherapy if nodye extravasation

    What material?

    - platinum coils (dated)- particle embolization (gelatin, PVA)

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    17/45

    Interventional Radiology

    Efficacy1: 78-100%

    re-intervention rate 7-25%

    internal iliac, internal pudendal, uterineComparison2:

    - efficacy 90% ( uterine compression sutures)

    - slightly better than balloon tamponade andpelvic devascularization

    1. Badawy SZ et. Al, Clin Imaging 2001; 25: 288-295

    2. Doumouchtsis SK, Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62: 542-47

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    18/45

    Transfusion Strategies

    - fixed number of PRBC

    FFP, platelets, cryoppt

    - repeated assessment ofcoagulation

    - stat hemorrhage

    protocol forunanticipated bleeding

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    19/45

    Transfusion Strategies

    In vitro TEG evidencesupports 1:1:1 ratio

    Sadana N et.al, Gertie Marx symposium, SOAP 2010

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    20/45

    Recombinant Factor VII a

    Licensed for use in hemophilia

    Important adjunct

    Reported efficacy 78-98% Improved coagulation, fewer RBC transfusion,

    lower mortality

    Disadvantages: Prohibitive costs, thrombosisNo standard dosing regimen

    Priya VR et. al, Clinic Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53(1): 165-81

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    21/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    Ashworth A, BJA 2010 Aug;105(4):401-16

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    22/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    No differences in:

    infectious complications need for ventilatory

    support

    DIC length of postoperative

    stay

    Multicenter cohort study

    Rebarber A et al, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:71520

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    23/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    Randomized Controlled

    Trial

    Reduced incidence ofhomologous transfusion

    (1/34 vs. 8/34)

    23.5% backgroundtransfusion rate

    Rainaldi MP et. al, Br J Anaesth1998 Feb;80(2):195-8

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    24/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    Retrospective cohort, case-control study of

    12000 patients undergoing cesarean delivery

    Theoretical use of cell salvage

    - reduced exposure to allogeneic blood in 48%

    - eliminated exposure in 14-25%

    Fong J et.al, Anesth Analg 2007; 104:666-672

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    25/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    Maternal Venous Blood

    TissueFactor

    FetalCells

    AmnioticFluid Proteins

    Geoghegan J, BJOG 2009 May;116(6):743-7

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    26/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

    high-risk obstetric

    patients

    pre-existing cell savage

    services cell washing + leucocyte

    depletion filter

    post-transfusion

    Kleihauer testing1

    cost saving $ 110.542

    1. McDonnell NJ et.al, Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):492-9

    2. Waters JR et. al, Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 869-75

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    27/45

    Intraoperative Cell Salvage (IOCS)

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    28/45

    Conservative Management of

    Placenta Accreta

    Reduced hysterectomy incidence to 15%, DIC

    to 5%, and transfusion by 50% 1

    20% need hysterectomy, 75% had

    spontaneous resorption of the placenta with a

    median delay from delivery of 13.5 weeks 2

    Infection, risk of recurrent placenta accreta

    1.Kayem G et. al, Obstet Gynecol 2004 Sep;104(3):531-6

    2. Sentilhes L et. al, Obstet Gynecol 2010 Mar;115(3):526-34

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    29/45

    Postoperative Care

    Most cases typically managed in L&D

    ICU admission

    Inadequate hemostasisMassive fluid shifts

    DIC

    Pulmonary edema

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    30/45

    Retained Placenta

    IVGA

    GETA

    Neuraxial techniques Intra-umbilical oxytocin injection

    NITROGLYCERIN

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    31/45

    Retained Placenta

    IV 100 to 200 mcg

    Dilution 50-100 mcg/ml

    SL 500 to 1000 mcg

    Mechanism of action?

    Release of NO

    placental tissue for

    uterine relaxation

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    32/45

    Retained Placenta

    Double-blind, multi-

    center, randomized,

    placebo-controlled trial

    Hemodynamically stable

    patients

    Umbilical oxytocin (50

    IU) was ineffective

    Weeks AD et.al, Lancet 2010 Jan 9;375(9709):141-7

    RELEASE trial

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    33/45

    Airway Management

    Traditional Mallampatti

    assessment (N = 61)

    Acoustic reflectometry

    (N = 21) 33% -one MP grade

    5% -two MP grades

    Decreased oropharyngealvolume

    Kodali BS et. al, Anesthesiology 2008 Mar;108(3):357-62

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    34/45

    Airway Management

    Superior illumination

    High resolution

    Favorable viewing angle

    Simulated difficult

    airways

    Morbidly obese

    Pregnancy??

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    35/45

    Airway Management

    Video laryngoscopy in obstetrics?

    - No randomized studies

    - Case series of 27 patients

    Gray K et. Al, O 13, OAA Annual Meeting Abstract, 2009, Jersey, UK

    C+L 1 C+L 2 C+L 3

    Standard view 14 (52) 12 (44) 1 (4)

    Video laryngoscope view 27 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    36/45

    Thrombocytopenia in Preeclampsia

    Quality vs. Quantity

    Spinal vs. Epidural

    Rate of platelet decline

    TEG vs. PFA

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    37/45

    Intrauterine Resuscitation

    IV fluids 1 L fluid bolus

    Maternal oxygenation

    Positioning lateral

    Simpson KR et.al, Obstet Gynecol 2005 Jun;105(6):1362-8

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    38/45

    Anesthetic Neurotoxicity

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    39/45

    Anesthetic Neurotoxicity

    GABA agonism

    NMDA antagonism

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    40/45

    Fetal Risk of Critical Care Drugs

    Remodeling

    Synaptogenesis

    Differentiation

    Migration

    Neurogenesis

    Birth

    GABA

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    41/45

    Anesthetic Neurotoxicity

    No differences in learning disabilities irrespective of

    the type of anesthesia for cesarean delivery

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    42/45

    Anesthetic Neurotoxicity

    Susceptible

    Dose-dependent

    Developmental stage

    dependent

    Avoidable with bettermaintenance of

    physiology?

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    43/45

    Case for Dexmedetomidine?

    Adrenergic mechanisms poorly developed

    Minimal transplacental transfer

    Inhibits myometrial contractions

    Not FDA approved

    Long term effects unknown

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    44/45

    Summary

    Multi-disciplinary management

    Cesarean hysterectomy - mainstay

    Use of cell saver, factor VII a

    Airway changes dramatically during labor

    Video laryngoscopes

    Developmental neurotoxicity of anesthetics

  • 7/30/2019 Anesthetic Considerations in Obstetric Emergencies

    45/45

    The single biggest problem in communication is the

    illusion that it has taken place

    http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1925/shaw-bio.html