atmospheric turbulences in wide-field interferometric images

13
ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC IMAGES (CASE OF THE SKA) Ivan Marti-Vidal Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie (Bonn, Germany) Limelette 4-6 Nov. 2009 J.C. Guirado, S. Jiménez-Monferrer, & J.M. Marcaide Univ. Valencia (Spain)

Upload: chars

Post on 06-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC IMAGES. (CASE OF THE SKA ). Ivan Marti-Vidal Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie (Bonn, Germany). J.C. Guirado, S. Jiménez-Monferrer, & J.M. Marcaide Univ. Valencia (Spain). Limelette 4-6 Nov. 2009. Da. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC

IMAGES(CASE OF THE SKA)

Ivan Marti-Vidal Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie (Bonn, Germany)

Limelette 4-6 Nov. 2009

J.C. Guirado, S. Jiménez-Monferrer, & J.M. Marcaide Univ. Valencia (Spain)

Page 2: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

POSITION-DEPENDENT PHASE GAIN

Page 3: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

SIMULATED SKA

200 stations:

- 100 stations in an inner core of 10 km diameter.- 100 stations in a square of 3000 km length.

-5 equiangular spiral arms; logarithmic spacing.

- Sensitivities from Jones (2004) (SKA memo 45)Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

Page 4: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

SIMULATED ATMOSPHERE

Ionosphere and wet troposphere follow Kolmogorov statistics.

-Ionosphere ( -2 ):

Fried length = 3 km @ 100 MHz

- Troposphere ( ): Seeing at 5 GHz = 0.1 as

(See Thomson, Moran & Swenson 1991)

Kolmogorov screens are self-similarLimelette4-6 Nov. 2009

Page 5: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS

-13 frequencies (150 - 24000 MHz)

- Separation of 5 degrees

-1,500 simulations at each frequency

-Astrometric uncertainty and dynamic range taken from statistics of image distributions.

Page 6: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

DEPENDENCE WITH FREQUENCY

SEPARATION = 5 deg. INT. TIME = 60 s

- Dominance of ionosphere below 500 MHz.

- Window between 500 and 15000 MHz with good detections and high astrometric precision.

- Dominance of troposphere above 15000 MHz.

S = 1000 nJy

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

Page 7: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

DEPENDENCE WITH FREQUENCY

SEPARATION = 5 deg. INT. TIME = 60 s

No Atmosphere

Page 8: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

DEPENDENCE WITH DISTANCEFREQUENCY = 1420 MHz INT. TIME = 60 s

- Dynamic range and astrometric precision limited by atmosphere.

- Better for smaller images and /or longer integration times.

- No dependence on flux density nor antenna sensitivities!

“LARGE” FLUX DENSITY (0.01 mJy)

Similar to Pradel, Charlot, & Lestrade (2006)

Page 9: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

REAL DATA: PHASE REFERENCING WITH VLBA

• Studied in MPIfR since 80s (Eckart et al., 1987, Witzel et al., 1988, etc.)

• Strong radiosources (0.25 - 3.5 Jy at 15GHz)

• Long term astrometry

program

THE S5 POLAR CAP SAMPLE

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

Page 10: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

Limelette4-6 Nov. 2009

REAL DATA: PHASE REFERENCING WITH VLBA

OBSERVATIONS @ 15 GHz

Page 11: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

CONCLUSIONS• Atmospheric turbulences generate position-dependent phase

gains in wide-field images.

• We have generated a set of Monte Carlo simulations of a realization of the SKA under the effect of turbulent ionosphere and wet troposphere.

• The astrometric precision and image fidelity decrease as the distance to the image phase center increases.

• The maximum dynamic range (and, indirectly, astrometric precision) does not depend on station sensitivity nor source flux density and is strongly limited.

• These results are qualitatively similar to results obtained from real phase-reference observations with the VLBA.

Marti-Vidal et al. (in preparation) & Marti-Vidal et al. (2009) (SKA memo 112)

Page 12: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

RECORD GUINESS OF PHASE-REFERENCING!!

0212+735 w.r.t. 2007+777 - SEPARATION OF 20.8 deg!

Page 13: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCES IN  WIDE-FIELD INTERFEROMETRIC  IMAGES

DEPENDENCE WITH ARRAY DISTRIBUTION AND SENSITIVITY

- LESS ANTENNAS: Dynamic range and astrometric precision roughly modified by the ratio of the number of baselines.

- LESS SENSITIVITY: Lower dynamic ranges for weak sources, but similar dynamic ranges for strong sources (i.e., same atmospheric limitation).

- SHORTER BASELINES: Slightly higher SNR for good detections. Therefore, astrometric precision not exactly modified by the ratio of baseline lengths.