detail project report , iwmp-5,...

Detail Project Report , IWMP-11, Godhra 20010-11

District Watershed Development Unit, Panchmahal

Detail Project Report , (DPR)

Integrated Watershed Management Programme

IWMP-11, Godhra Block

(2010-11)


District Watershed Development Unit, Panchmahal Page 1

Detail Project Report IWMP-11, Godhra Block (2010-11)

Project Implementing Agency (PIA)

Forest Department (Normal), Panchmahal

District Level Nodal Agency

DWDU, Panchmahal

State Level Nodal Agency GSWMA, Gandhinagar



Contents 1. 1. Basic Project Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8

Table no.1: Basic project information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11

Table no.3: Weightge of the project ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11

Table No.3.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed .................................................................................................................................................................... 12

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages ................................................................................................................................................................................ 13

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ........................................................................................................................................................... 13

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ................................................................................................................................................................ 14

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

2.1 Project Implementing Agency ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

2.2 About the Forest and Environment Department and its Objectives ............................................................................................................................................................ 16

2.3 Main Objective of the Department .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

2.4 SWOT Analysis of the PIA (Forest Department): ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

2.5 Details of Project Implementing Agency ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

Table-7: Details staffs of PIA: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table-7.1: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19

3.1 Geographical / Geo-hydrological Features .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 28



Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Table no. 15: Area Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 16: Irrigation facilities (Area in ha) ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 17.1: Crop details of Rabi Season ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Table no. 18: Livestock details of the Project IWMP-11 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

Table no. 19: Drinking water facilities prevailing in the project area .............................................................................................................................................................. 37

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

3.2 Socio-economic Profile of the project area..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43

Table no. 23: Migration details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44

Table no. 24: Poverty ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45

Table no.27: Per Capita Income (In Rs) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 48

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49

3.3 Livelihood patterns of the area: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 50

3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: ................................................................................................................................................................................ 51

Watershed Development Strategy ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59

4.1 Scientific Planning: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ....................................................................................................................................................... 62

4.2. Institution Building ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table no.32: Watershed Committee details .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 91

Table no. 33: Self Help Group Details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 105



Table no. 34: User Group detail ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 108

Table No. 34.1: The following types of groups were planned to be formed in the villages of the IWMP-11 watershed ............................................................................. 110

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-11 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 110

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures Rs.in lakh) ..................................................................................................................................................... 111

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works* ............................................................................................................................ 114

Table No.36.2 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Sankali ......................................................................................................................... 123

Table No.36.3 - Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Ladpur ....................................................................................................................... 124

Table No.36.4 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Chundadi ..................................................................................................................... 125

Table No.36.5 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Gadh ............................................................................................................................ 126

Table No.36.6 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Parvadi ........................................................................................................................ 127

Table No.36.7 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Vavdi Bujarg (Part) ...................................................................................................... 128

Table No.36.8 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Thana Garjan ............................................................................................................... 129

Table No.36.9 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Tajpur .......................................................................................................................... 130

Table No.36.10 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Jafrabad (Part) .......................................................................................................... 131

Table No.36.11 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Lilesara ...................................................................................................................... 132

Table No. 36.12 (a) Location of the Check dams of the project IWMP-11, Panchmahal. ............................................................................................................................. 133

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................................ 134

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...................................................................... 135

Table no. 39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises ............................................................................................................. 136

Table no. 39.1: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Rinchhiya) ........................................................................................ 145

Table no. 39.2 Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Sankali) ............................................................................................. 146

Table no. 39.3: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Ladpur) ............................................................................................ 147

Table no. 39.4: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Chundadi) ........................................................................................ 148



Table no. 39.5: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Gadh) ................................................................................................ 149

Table no. 39.6: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Parvadi) ............................................................................................ 150

Table no. 39.7: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Thanagarjan) ................................................................................... 151

Table no. 39.8: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Vavdi Bujarg -Part).......................................................................... 152

Table no. 39.9: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Tajpur) ............................................................................................. 153

Table no. 39.10: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Jafrabad-Part) ................................................................................ 154

Table no. 39.11: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Lilesara) ........................................................................................ 155

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ................................................................................................................... 156

Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................................. 159

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ................................................................................................................................................................. 161

4.4. Capacity Building: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 162

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 163

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 163

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ........................................................................................................................................................... 164

Details of the Budget of the Project IWMP-11 ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 166

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project (Rs in Lakh) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 166

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Rs)...................................................................................................................................... 167

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement (Rs in Lakhs) ................................................................................................................................................................ 168

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ............................................................................................................................................................. 169

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ....................................................................................................................................................................... 171

6.1 Expected Outcomes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 173

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 174



Table no. 54: Crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................................... 174

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 177

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litters, for solids please mention in KG. and income in .............................................. 177

Table no. 57: Expected Employment Generation in Project area: ................................................................................................................................................................. 179

Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area...................................................................................................................................................................... 180

Table no. 59: Per Capita Income ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 180

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 181

6.2 Logical Frame Work Analysis of the Project IWMP-11 of the Panchmahal. .................................................................................................................................................... 181

Logical Framework Analysis of the project IWMP-11 of Panchmahal ........................................................................................................................................................... 182

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 186

7.1.1 Three Ties of Monitoring: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 186

Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP-11 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 186

7.1.2 Evaluation: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 187

7.2 Plans for Post-Project Management/Sustainability Approach: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 187

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures ...................................................................................................................................................................... 187

7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management .................................................................................................................................................. 188

7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management ................................................................................................................................................................................ 188

Watershed level Committee .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 188

User Groups ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 188



CHAPTER - 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND



PROJECT BACKGROUND

1. 1. Basic Project Information

Panchmahal district is a part of Eastern Hilly Region of the State of Gujarat and sub-divided into two sub-micro regions namely, Mahi plain and

Forested scrub zone, on the basis of topography, climate, soils and natural vegetation. It lies between the parallels of latitude 22.17° and 23.20° and

the meridians of Longitude 73.20° and 74.2°.

The length of the district from north to south is about 128.7km and from east to west about 68.1 km. It is bounded on the north by the

Sabarkantha district, on the east of Dahod district, on the south by Anand districts. Out of the total geographical area 5120 Sq. km of the district,

cultivable land 47 percent and 22.50 percent land is under forest cover and its rank is 5th in terms of area among the districts of Gujarat state. The

region covers the western part of the district and includes Lunawada, Santrampur, Godhra, Kalol, Shehera, and Halol talukas. Geographically, the rocks

found in this region are alluvium, blown sand, etc., Deccan trap, Erinpurru Granite, Gneiss Aravalli and associated rocks.

The project IWMP-11 consists of eleven villages of the Godhra Block which falls on western part of the district Panchmahal. The villages are

named Rinchhiya, Sankali, Ladpur, Chundadi, Gadh,Parvadi,Vavdi Bujerg(Part),Thanagarjan,Tajpur,Jafrabad(Part) and Lilesara. The percentage of

forest area of Rinchiya 75.06 %,Sankali 29.74 % ,Ladpur 46.42 5,Chundadi 73.96 %,Gadh 44.94 % Vavdi Bujarg 21.18 %,Thanagarjan 95.64 %,Tajpur

2.41 % and Lilesara 25.28 %, where as village Parvadi and Jafrabad village have no forest Area.. The villages are under the Range forest area of east

zone of the Godhra Block. Basic details like the census code, Gram panchayat, Block, Total area, area to be treated in this project and the project cost of

the Project IWMP-11 are furnished in the Table no. 1



Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr. No.

Name of the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Total Area (Ha)

Area proposed to be treated

(Ha)

Total project cost

(In Lakh) PIA

Name C2K Code

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya 170070123140000

Chhariya

Godhra Panchmahal

427.63 427.63 51.316

Dy.C.F;

(Normal), Godhra

2 Sankali 170070122760000

Sankali 724.20 724.20 86.904

3 Ladpur 170070122730000

Ladpur 249.89 249.89 29.987

4 Chundadi 17007012

271000 Gadh 383.96 383.96 46.075

5 Gadh 170070122720000

Gadh 385.14 385.14 46.217

6 Parvadi 170070122700000

Parvadi 352.74 352.74 42.329

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 170070122690000

Vavdi Bujarg 803.99 803.99 96.479

8 Thanagarjan 170070123160000

Thanagarjan 666.25 666.25 79.950

9 Tajpur 170070123150000

Tajpur 332.39 332.39 39.887

10 Jafrabad

(Part) 170070122540000

Jafrabad (Part)

693.85 193.85 23.262

11 Lilesara 170070122810000

Lilesara 560.48 560.48 67.258

Total 5580.52 5080.52 609.664



The project IWMP-11 covers mainly eight micro-watersheds named 5E1B7c3e, 5E1B7d2f, 5E1B7d2e, 5E1B7d2c, 5E1B7c1i, 5E1B7c3d,

5E1B7d2b, 5E1B7c2d. One thousand hectors of land of total area has been covered through the previous prevailing project of the area, in which the

villages like Jafrabad (Part) has been treated five hundred hectors each. Hence the area which was proposed to be treated in this project is excludes

the area which was already treated by the previous watershed projects. The details of the previous project in the area are described in the table no. 4

and table no. 5.

Table no.2: Watershed information

Sr. No Name of the Village Total Area of

the Village (Ha)

Treated area (Ha)

Area Proposed to be treated in IWMP-11

(Ha)

Total Forest area of the Village (Ha)

No. Of watersheds

to be treated

Major Micro-watershed falls

in the village

1 Rinchhiya 427.63 0.00 427.63 321.00

08

5E1B7c3e

2 Sankali 724.20 0.00 724.20 215.38 5E1B7d2f

3 Ladpur 249.89 0.00 249.89 116.00 5E1B7d2e

4 Chundadi 383.96 0.00 383.96 283.96 5E1B7d2e

5 Gadh 385.14 0.00 385.14 173.08 5E1B7d2e

6 Parvadi 352.74 0.00 352.74 0.00 5E1B7d2c

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 803.99 0.00 803.99 170.28 5E1B7d2c

8 Thanagarjan 666.25 0.00 666.25 637.22 5E1B7c1i

9 Tajpur 332.39 0.00 332.39 8.00 5E1B7c3d

10 Jafrabad (Part) 693.85 500.00 193.85 0.00 5E1B7d2b

11 Lilesara 560.48 0.00 560.48 141.67 5E1B7c2d

Total 5580.52 500.00 5080.52 2066.03



1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Villages were selected for the watershed development programme not only considers the geo-hydrological parameter of the area but it

emphasizes the socio-economic condition of the area also. There are thirteen parameter in sum which are Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual

wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in

the area, Percentage of degraded land, Productivity potential of land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster

Approach for hilly terrain. The need was identified on the combined scores of these thirteen parameters, which was furnished in the table no.3. All the

parameters were taken in separate for each village and which gives a cumulative score of 99.73 out of total score of 150.

Table no.3: Weightge of the project

Project Name

Village Weightge

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya 5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Sankali 7.5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 92.50

Ladpur 5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Chundadi 5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Gadh 5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Gadh 5 3 5 5 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Parvadi 7.5 3 5 5 2 10 10 7.5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

2.5 3 5 3 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 85.50

Thanagarjan 10 3 5 3 2 10 15 7.5 5 15 5 15 5 100.50

Tajpur 7.5 3 5 5 2 10 10 7.5 5 10 5 15 5 90.00

Jafrabad (Part)

5 3 5 3 2 10 15 5 5 10 5 15 5 88.00

Lilesara 5 3 5 3 2 10 15 7.5 5 15 10 15 5 100.50

Average 6.36 3.27 5.45 4.73 2.18 10.91 15.45 6.36 5.45 11.82 5.91 16.36 5.45 99.73



Table No.3.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S. No

Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro



(10) watershed (5) watersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

1.3 Other projects/scheme running in the project villages

Other schemes which were running in the project villages are MGNREGA, Hariyali watershed programme, Indira Awas Yojana, BRGF and WASMO. The details of the schemes and the estimated number of beneficiaries benefited for the respective schemes are as follows.

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

Sr. No Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of

commencement

Villages covered Estimated number of

beneficiaries No Name

1 B.R.G.F Government of India

with World Bank Employment & Infrastructure 2006-10 11 All 1453

2 IAY Government of India Development of Social

Infrastructure 1990 10

Except Thanagarjan

96

3 MGNREGA Government of India Employment Generation 2001-02 9 Except

Thanagarjan,Vavdibujarg, chundi

1825

4 WASMO Government of Gujarat Water Supply 2001-02 5 Sankali,Jafrabad, Vavdibujarg and

Rinchiya 562

Table no 5 gives the details of the area treated by the previous watershed schemes. It shows that the Hariyali Watershed project has covered



500 ha of area of the village Chundadi and Bamroli (K) all together.

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro watershed

Watershed codes

Area under treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure

incurred up to

start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completi

on

1 Jafrabad (Part)

2002-2003

Jafrabad

1 Partly 5E1B7d2b

500 Ha

Govt. of India

DWDU Panchmahal

Taluka Panchayat

Godhra 30.00 10.35 34.50 % 34.50 %



CHAPTER - 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY



PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) approved the Forest Department as Project Implementing Agency (PIA) for the project sanctioned under

the Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) at Panchmahal of Gujarat State.

2.2 About the Forest and Environment Department and its Objectives

The Forests & Environment Department in the Government of Gujarat has environment wing and forest wing. The environment wing of the

Department is the apex body in the Gujarat State for implementation of all the environment related matters including Environment (Staggered) Act,

1986, which is an umbrella Act on environment in the country where as the Forest Department wing of the Gujarat Government is the apex body in the

Gujarat State for implementation all the activities implemented in the forest area. Mainly the forest department works to protect the existing forest

and generate forest through afforestation. The main mandate of the Department is to achieve the sustainable development in the State and introducing

the sound or easy management practices to conserve the soil and trees in the forest areas.

2.3 Main Objective of the Department The main aims of the Forest Department are as follows:

To Protect and Manage the forest for the Sustainable Development.

To Increase the vegetative coverage up to 33 % through Afforestation inside and afforestation outside the forest area as per the forest Policy.

To re-habitat the degraded forest lands through carrying out SMC works and afforestation work.

To take special measures for conserve the critically endangered species of animals

To accelerate forest settlement issues and dwellers' rights

To utilize the JBIC fund for afforestation



To increase network of JFMs and expand the coverage of Eco- clubs

Development of new forests / eco based tourism spots

2.4 SWOT Analysis of the PIA (Forest Department):

It is very much essential to understand the strength and weakness of Project Implementing Agency as the institution is going to implement

watershed activities in the project area. The Table no 6 presents the SWOT analysis of the PIA of the project IWMP-11. The table describes that the

Strengths are the opportunity which will award the PIA to achieve the goal of the project where as the weakness are the threat which may obstacle to

achieve the objective of the project.

Table no.6: SWOT Analysis of the Project Implementing Agency

Strength

Presence of dedicated and experience staffs at all level (Field,

Middle Management and High/ Officer Level) of the Forest

Department.

Presence of field/local level staffs at the project area.

Regular visit by the RFO/ ACF to the forest area or project area

Use of modern techniques in the field with proper technique

Previous knowledge of convergence with various line

departments.

Prevailing accounting procedure of the Department.

Opportunity

Proper Implementation of the Project

Can easily identify and resolve the problems of the area.

Proper Monitoring and guidance to the WDTs.

Impact will be more visible due to proper implementation

Proper planning and implementation of the convergence of the

projects.

Transparency in Accounting System



Weakness

Various schemes is being implemented by the department with

limited human resources/ staffs

Presence of Poor infrastructure at the field level.

Threat

Work overload may mislead the watershed project or may divert

the vision at the time of implementation of the projects of IWMP.

Can dissatisfy the team to work properly

2.5 Details of Project Implementing Agency

Table- 7 and 7.1 gives the details of the Project Implementing Agency of IWMP-11 of the Godhra Taluka of Panchmahal District. Table 7 deals

with the address of the PIA where as the table 7.1 represents the staffs allotted for the specific project with their details. More staffs can be recruited

as per the requirement of the project.. The tables are given below.

Table-7: Details staffs of PIA:

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-11

Type of Department Forest Department

Name of PIA Deputy Conservator of Forest (Normal),Godhra Forest Division

Nodal Officer of the Project, PIA Shree G.R.Sisodiya

Designation & Address R.F.O, Range Forest Office,Godhra(E)

Telephone & Fax 02672-242804

E-mail [email protected]



Table-7.1: Staff at PIA level:

Sr. no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience

(Yrs) Job assigned

Monthly remuneration

1 Shri G.R.Sisodiya 52 M RFO B.A 27 Nodal Officer,

PIA 28000/-

2 Vankar Dhulabhai I 40 M W.D.T. Eng D.C.E. 14 W.D.T. Eng 12000/-

3 Vala Bipinbhai R 35 M W.D.T.Agri M.R.M,

B.R.S(Agri) 10 W.D.T.Agri 8000/-

4 Solanki Kirtipal I 24 M W.D.T.CM M.S.W - W.D.T.CM 8000/-

5 Parikha Akash 23 M W.D.T. A/C. B.Com - W.D.T. A/C. 7000/-

6 Shaikh Imran M 29 M W.D.T. D.E.O. B.C.A. 6 Years W.D.T. D.E.O. 5000/-

7 Chauhan Jasvantiben H. 39 F Messenger S.S.C. 5 Years Messenger 3000/-



CHAPTER - 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA



BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA Introduction: The chapter is broadly divided in to three major heads; the first head deals with geographical information of the area, the second

head deals with the socio-economic condition of the project area the last head deals with the livelihood pattern of the area where as. Brief descriptions

about them are given below

3.1 Geographical / Geo-hydrological Features

The climate of district is characterized by a hot and dry summer non- rainy season. It also considered as a drought prone area as per NRAA. The

winter seasons start from December and will last till February followed by the hot summer season from March to May. The south-west monsoon

season is from June to September and the post monsoon season from October to November. The details of geographical information like pattern of

land uses, climatic condition, soil regimes, soil erosion and salinity and how the people harvesting the ground are described briefly as under.

3.1.1 Land use pattern: Table no.8 gives the details of the pattern of land uses in the project villages of the IWMP-11 which is in Godhra Taluka. The

total geographical area of the proposed village of IWMP-11 is 3992.63 hectors, out of that 1000 hectors are being already treated by the previous

watershed programme.

Out of total geographical area 37.03 percent area covered by forest land in which the Parvadi and Jafrabad village no area of Forest, The total

area of agricultural use is 3045.45 ha i.e. 54.57 percent of the total area. 94.06 % percent of total geographical area which is completely rain-fed;

mainly a Kharif crops are cultivated where as No any village have pasture land. Near about 8.40 percent of the percent total wasteland in which 2.80

percent belongs to cultivable wasteland.



Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

Sr. No.

Project Name

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village

(Ha)

Forest Area (Ha)

% Area

Agricultural use (Ha)

% Rain fed

area (Ha)

%

Perm-anent

pastures (Ha)

%

Wasteland (Ha)

Cultivable % Non-

cultivable %

Total Waste land

%

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya 427.63 321.00 75.06 106.63 24.94 408.63 95.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2 Sankali 724.20 215.38 29.74 508.82 70.26 664.79 91.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 Ladpur 249.89 116.00 46.42 125.00 50.02 237.89 95.20 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.00 3.89 1.56 8.89 3.56

4 Chundadi 383.96 283.96 73.96 73.38 19.11 383.96 100.00 0.00 0.00 4.14 1.08 23.04 6.00 27.18 7.08

5 Gadh 385.14 173.08 44.94 110.00 28.56 385.14 100.00 0.00 0.00 59.92 15.56 42.14 10.94 102.06 26.50

6 Parvadi 352.74 0.00 0.00 312.00 88.45 282.74 80.16 0.00 0.00 27.19 7.71 13.55 3.84 40.74 11.55

7 Vavdibujarg (Part)

803.99 170.28 21.18 569.21 70.80 803.99 100.00 0.00 0.00 19.80 2.46 44.70 5.56 64.50 8.02

8 Thanagarjan 666.25 637.22 95.64 28.00 4.20 666.25 100.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.15 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.15

9 Tajpur 332.39 8.00 2.41 324.39 97.59 186.00 55.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

10 Jafrabad (Part)

693.85 0.00 0.00 531.81 76.65 669.17 96.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 162.04 23.35 162.04 23.35

11 Lilesara 560.48 141.67 25.28 356.21 63.55 560.48 100.00 0.00 0.00 39.69 7.08 22.91 4.09 62.60 11.17

Total 5580.52 2066.59 37.03 3045.45 54.57 5249.04 94.06 0.00 0.00 156.77 2.81 312.27 5.60 469.04 8.40



Fig: 3.1: Soil Pattern of Panchmahal

3.1.2 Agro-Climate Condition: The agro-climatic condition of the project area is same as the

district climatic condition. The climate of the district is characterized by a hot summer and dry in the

non- rainy season. It also considered as a drought prone area as per NRAA. The winter seasons start

from December to February followed by the hot season from March to May. The south-west monsoon

season is from June to September and the post monsoon season from October to November.

3.1.2. A. Soil Regimes

The soil pattern of the district shown in the fig. 3.1, which indicates the types of soil in the

district are deep black, shallow black, grey brown and mixed red. The soil texture in the district is

Black salt or mixed red and Brown salt, the area under deep black and grey brown is small. The district

has undulating topography and hard rocky terrain (with altitude varying from 75 m to 300 m), with

shallow medium black soil having low fertility. Soil depths vary from a few centimeters to 120 cm in

most areas. The soil in the hilly areas is subjected to constant erosion due to lack of vegetation cover.

The western parts comprising Kalol and parts of Halol, Godhra and Lunawada Taluka constitute a

plain land. It is a part of the Mahi river basin. This part is mostly flat, punctuated at parts by isolated

hills. The northern and eastern portion comprising mainly Lunawada, Santrampur and Jambughoda

talukas are covered by hills and forests intercepted by plain cultivated lands and villages situated in

the river valley.



IWMP-11 watershed project falls under Madhya Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly shallow black soil. The depth of soil is moderate

to deep about 90 to 120 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and clay. Fifty percent of the total project area is dominated by the mixed

red black soil. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area of project is moderate ranging

from 1-20% slope.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

Sr. No. Project Name Name of the Agro-

climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in

ha

1 IWMP-11 Madhaya Gujarat

427.63 Rinchhiya Sandy Clay Loam 427.63 Flat to Moderate Slope

724.20 Sankali Sandy Clay Loam 724.20 Flat to Moderate Slope

249.89 Ladpur Sandy Clay Loam 249.89 Flat to Moderate Slope

383.96 Chundadi Sandy Clay Loam 383.96 Flat to Moderate Slope

385.14 Gadh Sandy Clay Loam 385.14 Flat to Moderate Slope

352.74 Gadh Sandy Clay Loam 352.74 Flat to Moderate Slope

803.99 Parvadi Sandy Clay Loam 803.99 Flat to Moderate Slope

666.25 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) Sandy Clay Loam 666.25 Flat to Moderate Slope

332.39 Thanagarjan Sandy Clay Loam 332.39 Flat to Moderate Slope

693.85 Tajpur Sandy Clay Loam 693.85 Flat to Moderate Slope

560.48 Jafrabad

(Part) Sandy Clay Loam 560.48 Flat to Moderate Slope

427.63 Lilesara Sandy Clay Loam 427.63 Flat to Moderate Slope



3.1.2. B. Flood and drought information: The project area has no previous experience of flood rather it has a great experience of drought. The

drought used to found once in three year so it is called drought prone area. Table 10 gives the detailed information about flood and drought conditions

of the project villages.

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No Name of Project Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya Nil Once in 3 Year

2 Sankali Nil Once in 3 Year

3 Ladpur Nil Once in 3 Year

4 Chundadi Nil Once in 3 Year

5 Gadh Nil Once in 3 Year

6 Parvadi Nil Once in 3 Year

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) Nil Once in 3 Year

8 Thanagarjan Nil Once in 3 Year

9 Tajpur Nil Once in 3 Year

10 Jafrabad (Part) Nil Once in 3 Year

11 Lilesara Nil Once in 3 Year



3.1.2. C Soil erosion and soil salinity details: Decline in the soil quality due to sheet erosion is frightening the people of this area. There has a

substantial reduction in the application of organic manure resulting in reduced in moisture retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the

organic carbon content is very low. Lack of water conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration of

environmental degradation and soil erosion.

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Project Name

Village Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)

Run off Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/

year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion

IWMP-11 All

a Sheet 3045.45

310 mm

2 to 3

b Rill 2024.68

c Gully 510.39

d Ravenous 0

Sub-Total 5580.52

Wind erosion

Total 5580.52



Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Project Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

IWMP-11 - 7 to 7.5 Inherent

3.1.2. D Details of Rainfall and Temperature

The agriculture of the project area is completely dependent on rainfall of monsoon. The rainfall is suddenly decreased from 2006 onwards due

to effect of the global warming which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is

about 535.20 mm. Constant crop failure has become a common phenomenon in this area. Details are given in the table 12.

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project Year Average rainfall Max Temperature (0C) Min Temp. (0C)

IWMP-11

2007 837 mm 43.50 13.00

2008 513 mm 46.00 14.00

2009 374 mm 43.00 15.00

2010 493 mm 44.30 13.00

2011 459 mm 44.50 13.00

3.1.2. E. Details Slopes of the project area: The slope of the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height)

from satellite maps. These maps will help in recommendations/implementation of suitable land management practices in association of other

thematic information.



Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Village name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Rinchhiya 150 mt to 160 mt Below 5 % Meshari Streams

Sankali 140 mt to 158mt Below 5 % Meshari Streams

Ladpur 155 mt to 160 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

Chundadi 142 mt to 147 mt Below 4 % Meshari Streams

Gadh 140 mt to 148 mt Below 4 % Meshari Streams

Parvadi 140 mt to 152 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 141 mt to 145 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

Thanagarjan 148 mt to 150 mt Below 4 % Meshari Streams

Tajpur 145mt to 150 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

Jafrabad (Part) 142 mt to 147 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

Lilesara 142 mt to 146 mt Below 3 % Meshari Streams

3.1.3. Land and Agriculture:

People of this region are very poor. The average land holding of the project area is about one ha. The total net sown area is 1717.8 ha where

378 ha area are cultivated 2 times in the total project area. The main crops under agriculture are Maize, Black lentils and Rice. Some of the farmers

cultivated wheat in the Rabi season if the irrigation facilities are available. The details about land ownership are given in the table 14; table 15 shows

the area of agriculture, 16 no table gives the details of the irrigation facilities available in the area. Only well is the mode of irrigation in this area,

which is available for only two months.



Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr. no

Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease HHs taking

land on lease

Land Less House Hold

Gen OBC SC ST

1 Rinchhiya 07 95 - 02 - - 3

2 Sankali - 343 02 06 - - 0

3 Ladpur 05 120 05 31 - - 2

4 Chundadi - 88 - - - - 0

5 Gadh 17 278 08 25 - - 0

6 Parvadi 32 241 02 52 - - 0

7 Vavdi Bujarg (Part) 05 347 05 - - - 81

8 Thanagarjan 00 274 - 25 - - 15

9 Tajpur 02 181 - - - - 0

10 Jafrabad (Part) 19 287 03 104 - - 0

11 Lilesara 04 298 02 03 - - 75



Table no. 15: Area Agriculture

Sr. no Name of the Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Rinchhiya 85.30 26.66 5.33

2 Sankali 407.06 127.21 25.44

3 Ladpur 100.00 31.25 6.25

4 Chundadi 58.70 18.35 3.67

5 Gadh 88.00 27.50 5.50

6 Parvadi 249.60 78.00 15.60

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 455.37 142.30 28.46

8 Thanagarjan 22.40 7.00 1.40

9 Tajpur 259.51 81.10 16.22

10 Jafrabad (Part) 425.45 132.95 26.59

11 Lilesara 284.97 89.05 17.81

IWMP-11 2436.36 761.36 152.27

Table no. 16: Irrigation facilities (Area in ha)

Sr. no

Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Rinchhiya - - - 2 21 21 4 32 32

2 Sankali - - - 2 32 32 4 19 19

3 Ladpur - - - 2 12 12 4 42 42

4 Chundadi - - - 3 12 12 4 36 36

5 Gadh - - - 3 13 13 4 38 38



6 Parvadi - - - 3 18 18 4 33 33

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) - - - 3 25 25 4 15 15

8 Thanagarjan - - - 3 31 31 4 12 12

9 Tajpur - - - 2 14 14 4 19 19

10 Jafrabad (Part) - - - 2 15 15 4 30 30

11 Lilesara - - - 2 28 28 4 35 35

IWMP-11 - - - 221 221 - 311 311

3.1.4 Crop details:

Main crops found in this area are maize, Red grams (Tur), Rice (Dangar) and wheat. Farmers prefer to cultivate maize in Karif season where

wheat in Rabi season. Largest land area is used for cultivation of Maize 1705.45 ha where the lowest contribution is from Rice in Karif season. Due to

lack of water availability people are not able to manipulate the land in the Zaid season.



Table no. 17: Crop details of Karif Season:

Sr. no

Name of Project Villages

Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1 Maize(Kg) Crop 2 Tur(Kg) Crop 3 Rice(Kg)

Area Production Productivity

(Kg/Ha) Area Production

Productivity (Kg/Ha)


(Kg/Ha)

1 Rinchhiya 59.71 77626.64 1300 8.53 7250.84 850 17.06 15610.63 915

2 Sankali 284.94 356174.00 1250 40.71 33582.12 825 81.41 73270.08 900

3 Ladpur 70.00 85750.00 1225 10.00 7500.00 750 20.00 18300.00 915

4 Chundadi 41.09 50338.68 1225 5.87 4813.73 820 11.74 10566.72 900

5 Gadh 61.60 77000.00 1250 8.80 6864.00 780 17.60 14960.00 850

6 Parvadi 174.72 222768.00 1275 24.96 21216.00 850 49.92 44179.20 885

7 Vavdi Bujarg (Part)

318.76 382509.12 1200 45.54 34152.60 750 91.07 81966.24 900

8 Thanagarjan 15.68 18032.00 1150 2.24 1848.00 825 4.48 3808.00 850

9 Tajpur 181.66 236155.92 1300 25.95 19463.40 750 51.90 46712.16 900

10 Jafrabad

(Part) 297.81 379712.34 1275 42.54 36163.08 850 85.09 80835.12 950

11 Lilesara 199.48 259320.88 1300 28.50 21372.60 750 56.99 62692.96 1100

IWMP-11 1705.45 2145387.58 1250.00 243.64 194226.37 800.00 487.27 452901.11 915.00



Table no. 17.1: Crop details of Rabi Season

Sr. no

Name of Project Villages

Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Maize(Kg) Crop 2 Wheat(Kg) Crop 3 Gram(Kg)


(Kg/Ha) Area Production Productivity

(Kg/Ha) Area Production Productivity

(Kg/Ha)

1 Rinchhiya 10.66 13858 1300 10.66 16523 1550 5.33 2247500 1450

2 Sankali 50.88 63600 1250 50.88 78864 1550 25.44 2286250 1475

3 Ladpur 12.5 15312.5 1225 12.5 19375 1550 6.25 2286250 1475

4 Chundadi 7.34 8991.5 1225 7.34 10643 1450 3.67 2102500 1450

5 Gadh 11 13750 1250 11 16775 1525 5.5 2173125 1425

6 Parvadi 31.2 39780 1275 31.2 46800 1500 15.6 2175000 1450

7 Vavdi Bujarg

(Part) 56.92 68304 1200 56.92 85380 1500 28.46 2137500 1425

8 Thanagarjan 2.8 3220 1150 2.8 4060 1450 1.4 2102500 1450

9 Tajpur 32.44 42172 1300 32.44 48660 1500 16.22 2212500 1475

10 Jafrabad

(Part) 53.18 67804.5 1275 53.18 78440.5 1475 26.59 2138750 1450

11 Lilesara 35.62 46306 1300 35.62 51649 1450 17.81 2066250 1425

IWMP-11 304.55 380687.5 1250 304.55 456825 1500 152.27 2175000 1450



3.1.5 Livestock details.

The cluster villages have a total of 2790 cows and 3393 buffaloes out of which majority are of local breed, there are s 6725goats and 2653

bullocks are present in the project area. Due to shallow depth and surface water has reduced the fodder availability and pasture area for their

animals. The productivity of the dairy animals is so low also there is no dairy cooperative in the village.

Table no. 18: Livestock details of the Project IWMP-11

Sr. no

Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk (Buffalo+Cow)

(Lt/Year)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen

No milk No Milk No Milk

1 Rinchhiya 125 39750 110 14520 54270 250 3750 0 75 125

2 Sankali 845 268710 528 69696 338406 1700 25500 0 920 200

3 Ladpur 275 87450 310 40920 128370 900 13500 0 200 100

4 Chundadi 225 71550 175 23100 94650 250 3750 0 75 350

5 Gadh 300 95400 250 33000 128400 350 5250 0 100 100

6 Parvadi 375 119250 350 46200 165450 525 7875 0 250 200

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 198 62964 257 33924 96888 550 8250 0 281 350

8 Thanagarjan 200 63600 150 19800 83400 300 4500 0 200 150

9 Tajpur 450 143100 375 49500 192600 425 6375 0 200 250

10 Jafrabad (Part) 250 79500 150 19800 99300 1200 18000 0 252 370

11 Lilesara 150 47700 135 17820 65520 275 4125 0 100 125

IWMP-11 3393 1078974 2790 368280 1447254 6725 100875 0 2653 2320



3.1.6 Ground water, drinking water and CPR of the Project area:

Table no.19 detailed about the drinking water available and the ground water table in project area.

Table no. 19: Drinking water facilities prevailing in the project area

Sr. no

Project Name Village Ground water

table (mt) Source of drinking water

Availability in months

Quality

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya 12 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

2 Sankali 12 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

3 Ladpur 12 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

4 Chundadi 11 Handpump,Open Well Up to April Low Quality

5 Gadh 11 Handpump,Open Well Up to April Low Quality

6 Parvadi 13 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 14 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

8 Thanagarjan 13 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

9 Tajpur 12 Handpump,Open Well Up to April Low Quality

10 Jafrabad (Part) 12 Handpump,Open Well Up to April Low Quality

11 Lilesara 12 Hand pump, Open Well Up to April Low Quality

It was found that only hand pump and well are the main source of drinking water and it is available for only 10 months. Table 20 gives the

detail of the common property resources of the project area. The CPR includes the forest area, village pond and the waste/ degraded land. The details

are detailed in the following the table.



Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sr. No.

Names of project

Village CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (Specify dep’t.)

PRI Any other (Pl.Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (Specify dep’t.)

PRI Any other (Pl.Specify)

1

IWMP- 11

Rinchhiya

Wasteland/ degraded land - - Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot - - Forest 321.00 321.00 Village Ponds/ Tanks - - Community Buildings - - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship - - Others (Pl. specify) -

2 Sankali

Waste/ degraded land - - Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot - - Forest 215.38 215.38 Village Ponds/ Tanks 0.05 - Community Buildings 0.02 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 0.01 - Others (Pl. specify) -

3 Ladpur

Waste/ degraded land 8.89 3.89 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot 0.42 -



Forest 116.00 100.00 Village Ponds/ Tanks 0.25 - Community Buildings 1.00 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 1.50 - Others (Pl. specify) -

4 Chundadi

Waste/ degraded land 27.18 20.00 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot 0.03 - Forest 283.96 283.96 Village Ponds/ Tanks - - Community Buildings 0.03 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 0.40 - Others (Pl. specify) -

5 Gadh

Waste/degraded land 102.06 52.06 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot 0.66 - Forest 173.08 173.08 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1.56 - Community Buildings 0.22 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 0.01 -

Others (Pl. specify) - -

Parvadi Waste/degraded land 40.74 12.74 Pastures - - Orchards - -



Village Woodlot 0.68 - Forest - - Village Ponds/ Tanks 0.46 - Community Buildings 2.56 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 0.20 - Others (Pl. specify) - -

Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

Waste/degraded land 64.50 15.00 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot - - Forest 170.28 170.28 Village Ponds/ Tanks 10.53 - Community Buildings 3.50 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 2.45 - Others (Pl. specify) - -

Thanagarjan

Waste/degraded land 1.03 - Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot 5.66 - Forest 637.22 637.22 Village Ponds/ Tanks - - Community Buildings 1.50 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 0.40 -

Others (Pl. specify) - -

Tajpur Waste/degraded land - -



Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot - - Forest 8.00 8.00 Village Ponds/ Tanks 1.00 - Community Buildings 2.00 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship - - Others (Pl. specify) - -

Jafrabad (Part)

Waste/degraded land 162.04 50.00 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot - - Forest - - Village Ponds/ Tanks 2.0 - Community Buildings 12.00 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship 3.00 - Others (Pl. specify) - -

Lilesara

Waste/degraded land 62.60 62.60 Pastures - - Orchards - - Village Woodlot 15.00 - Forest 141.67 141.67 Village Ponds/ Tanks 2.00 - Community Buildings 2.52 - Weekly Markets - - Permanent markets - - Temples/ Places of worship - - Others (Pl. specify) - -



3.2 Socio-economic Profile of the project area

3.2.1 Demographic Information:

The project IWMP-11 consists of total eleven villages and the detail demographic information is given in the table no 21. There are 27997 persons in

the project villages (From the door to door survey report), out of which 14314 male and 13683 female members. The sex ratio is 955 females per

1000 males. SC population is very less as compare to the ST in the project area.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. no Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Rinchhiya 592 309 283 0 0 0 0.00 12 7 5 2.03

2 Sankali 2683 1340 1343 19 10 9 0.71 644 342 302 24.00

3 Ladpur 1097 537 560 31 15 16 2.83 325 165 160 29.63

4 Chundadi 457 233 224 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

5 Gadh 2202 1102 1100 168 98 70 7.63 284 137 147 12.90

6 Parvadi 2146 1088 1058 0 0 0 0.00 387 184 203 18.03

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 6578 3383 3195 45 25 20 0.68 0 0 0 0.00

8 Thanagarjan 1707 893 814 0 0 0 0.00 602 317 285 35.27

9 Tajpur 1285 667 618 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00

10 Jafrabad (Part) 7268 3714 3554 25 13 12 0.34 914 458 456 12.58

11 Lilesara 1982 1048 934 0 0 0 0.00 25 12 13 1.26

IWMP-11 27997 14314 13683 288 161 127 1.03 3193 1622 1571 11.40



3.2.2 Literacy Rate of the Project area: Male literacy rate (42.33 percent) is more than the Female literacy (23.67 percent) in the Project area of

IWMP-11. The total literacy rate of the project area is 33.21. Out of the total literate the literacy above the age 14 is less i.e. near about 40 percent in

which literacy below the age 14 is 59.27 percent. The students are not getting into higher studies after the SSC due to unavailability of the high school

in near distance. The details are presented in the table 22.

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. no Village

Literacy

Literacy % above age

14

Literacy % below age

14 Total

Population Total No of

Literate % Male % Female %

1 Rinchhiya 592 257 43.41 184 59.55 73 25.80 39 61

2 Sankali 2683 1223 45.58 815 60.82 408 30.38 41 59

3 Ladpur 1097 557 50.77 354 65.92 203 36.25 43 57

4 Chundadi 457 260 56.89 182 78.11 78 34.82 42 58

5 Gadh 2202 1263 57.36 831 75.41 432 39.27 41 59

6 Parvadi 2146 1387 64.63 812 74.63 575 54.35 42 58

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 6578 831 12.63 551 16.29 280 8.76 42 58

8 Thanagarjan 1707 1046 61.28 656 73.46 390 47.91 38 62

9 Tajpur 1285 595 46.30 418 62.67 177 28.64 42 58



10 Jafrabad (Part) 7268 1234 16.98 837 22.54 397 11.17 40 60

11 Lilesara 1982 645 32.54 419 39.98 226 24.20 38 62

IWMP-11 27997 9298 33.21 6059 42.33 3239 23.67 40.73 59.27

3.2.3 Migration status: Table 23 shows the migration details of the project IWMP-11. Maximum people of the area used to go to Surat, Ahemadabad,

Varodara and Rajkot to work of centering, catering and labour work in the factories.

Table no. 23: Migration details

Sr. no

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for

migration

Income during migration / month

(Rs.) Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Rinchhiya 592 59 50 9 - 54 5 Employment 2000 to 6000

2 Sankali 2683 183 146 37 - 183 0 Employment 2000 to 6000

3 Ladpur 1097 143 112 31 - 139 4 Employment 2000 to 6000

4 Chundadi 457 45 41 5 - 45 0 Employment 2000 to 6000

5 Gadh 2202 179 163 16 - 137 42 Employment 2000 to 6000

6 Parvadi 2146 156 122 34 - 91 65 Employment 2000 to 6000

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 6578 134 114 20 - 98 36 Employment 2000 to 6000

8 Thanagarjan 1707 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0

9 Tajpur 1285 148 124 24 - 96 52 Employment 2000 to 6000

10 Jafrabad

(Part) 7268 196 147 49 - 111 85 Employment 2000 to 6000

11 Lilesara 1982 155 109 47 - 70 85 Employment 2000 to 6000

IWMP-11 27997 1398 1128 272 0 1024 374



3.2.4 Poverty: More than 65.39 percent i.e. 1281 households are belongs to BPL families, in which 510 are below 16 and 771 households are above

the 16 as per the Gujarat Government. The total no of landless households are 176 which are 8.98 percent of the total household. Details are given in

table 24.

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sr. no Village Total

Household

BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less

HH % of land less

HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Rinchhiya 102 22 41 63 61.76 3 2.94

2 Sankali 256 12 93 105 41.02 0 0.00

3 Ladpur 119 48 27 75 63.03 2 1.68

4 Chundadi 33 2 7 9 27.27 0 0.00

5 Gadh 225 41 111 152 67.56 0 0.00

6 Parvadi 227 87 86 173 76.21 0 0.00

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 210 33 42 75 35.71 81 38.57

8 Thanagarjan 314 21 121 142 45.22 15 4.78

9 Tajpur 142 41 32 73 51.41 0 0.00

10 Jafrabad (Part) 210 140 110 250 119.05 0 0.00

11 Lilesara 121 63 101 164 135.54 75 61.98

IWMP-11 1959 510 771 1281 65.39 176 8.98

3.2.5 Village Infrastructure: Table no 25 shows the infrastructure facilities available in the Villages.



Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr. no

Village Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market yard (in

KM)

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution

LP UP HS

1 Rinchhiya Yes 01 01 - - 03 - 08 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

2 Sankali Yes 03 02 01 - 03 - 18 2 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

3 Ladpur Yes 02 01 01 - 03 - 20 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

4 Chundadi Yes 02 01 - - 03 - 10 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

5 Gadh Yes 02 01 - - 02 - 11 1 1 01 -

6 Parvadi Yes 01 01 1 - 02 - 08 2 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

Yes 02 01 - - 05 - 05 - - - Gram

Panchyat

8 Thanagarjan No 01 01 - - 05 - 09 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

9 Tajpur Yes 02 01 - - 03 - 12 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

10 Jafrabad (Part)

Yes 03 02 - - 05 - 05 1 1 01 Gram

Panchyat

11 Lilesara Yes 02 01 - - 05 - 05 - - 01 Gram

Panchyat



3.2.6 Assets and facilities: Table no 26 shows the facilities available in the project villages.

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr. no

Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with TV

set

HHs with cooking

gas

HHs with

Drinking water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-

wheeler 4-

wheeler

1 Rinchhiya 80 20 0 50 5 0 15 0 2 0

2 Sankali 490 125 10 150 15 2 25 0 5 1

3 Ladpur 231 75 8 75 22 2 36 4 3 0

4 Chundadi 80 10 2 52 26 4 22 0 2 1

5 Gadh 310 150 4 80 40 6 55 3 5 2

6 Parvadi 150 105 12 95 45 4 52 4 7 2

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

215 200 55 105 74 12 65 10 16 5

8 Thanagarjan 300 120 6 85 25 3 18 2 2 2

9 Tajpur 180 104 10 75 35 2 16 4 1 1

10 Jafrabad (Part) 450 226 60 104 65 12 36 3 6 8

11 Lilesara 250 135 25 100 45 5 19 2 2 3

Total 2936 1270 192 971 397 52 359 32 51 25



3.2.7 Income details: Mainly the people are depending on agriculture Animal Husbandry causal labour and others like service in private company

and government offices. The Detail income from the respective field is presented in the table no.27.

Table no.27: Per Capita Income (In Rs)

Sr. no Name of Village Agriculture Animal

husbandry Casual labour

Services Handicraft Others Total

1 Rinchhiya 9500 2000 1500 5000 0 750 18750

2 Sankali 8500 1500 1800 8500 0 1000 21300

3 Ladpur 8500 1500 1800 8000 0 1000 20800

4 Chundadi 9800 1500 2000 6000 0 1000 20300

5 Gadh 9700 1800 1800 8000 0 1200 22500

6 Parvadi 9000 1400 2200 9000 0 1200 22800

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 9000 2000 2500 8000 0 1500 23000

8 Thanagarjan 9500 2000 2000 8500 0 1000 23000

9 Tajpur 11000 2500 2000 7000 0 1200 23700

10 Jafrabad (Part) 11000 2600 2500 11000 0 1900 29000

11 Lilesara 10000 1500 2500 7000 0 1800 22800

IWMP-11 105500 20300 22600 86000 0 13550 247950



Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. no Village Animal Fodder Fuel wood

Total income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Rinchhiya 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

2 Sankali 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

3 Ladpur 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

4 Chundadi 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

5 Gadh 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

6 Parvadi 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

8 Thanagarjan 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

9 Tajpur 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

10 Jafrabad (Part) 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

11 Lilesara 0 Open grazing 0 For self -

3.3 Livelihood patterns of the area:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate in search of daily wage

labourers. Another Minor occupation of the people was handicraft in two villages but now the people are abstained from their traditional occupation.



3.3.1. Occupation pattern: The detail occupational pattern of the Project IWMP-11 is on the table 29. It was found that maximum people are

depending on the agriculture for their livelihood. Beside agriculture people used to be involve in the causal labour for the income generation.

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr. no Village Total work

force Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH) Agriculture +

AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Rinchhiya 100 16 40 56 40 4 0 1

2 Sankali 397 230 110 340 45 12 0 2

3 Ladpur 297 52 55 107 175 15 0 3

4 Chundadi 119 25 30 55 56 8 0 2

5 Gadh 366 152 105 257 99 10 0 2

6 Parvadi 307 125 104 229 65 13 0 3

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 174 32 75 107 56 11 0 4

8 Thanagarjan 227 28 65 93 125 9 0 3

9 Tajpur 281 129 69 198 75 8 0 4

10 Jafrabad (Part) 255 95 70 165 74 16 0 6

11 Lilesara 213 35 85 120 85 8 0 4

IWMP -11 2736 919 808 1727 895 114 0 34



Fig:-Livelihood Pattern of the Project area IWMP-11

3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area:

3.4.1 Introduction

This section provides comparative analysis of watershed area with respect to world, India, Gujarat and Panchmahal District standards. The

term productivity means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an

average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.



Data made available by baseline survey (for all villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication, 2006 (For Gujarat and India) and final

district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture. The results show that productivity is important not only because we observe a strong relationship with

profits but that watershed area that should be taken to improve the production. These results indicate that the watershed area comes under semi-arid

region. So farmers are used to cultivate only in rain-fed areas. Mainly the farmers of this project area used to cultivate the crops like maize, paddy and

red gram in the monsoon and wheat in the Rabi season and in ZAID the farm lands are seen empty due to low water availability in the area. The

comparative of the above main crops are given below in the graph.

Crop-1: MAIZE:

It was found in the survey that farmers are used to cultivate maize in the monsoon period in large scale. The productivity of the maize is just

30% compared with the world maize productivity where as 60% in compared with the country’s maize productivity. The productivity of the district is

as same as the productivity of the country. So there is a scope of near about 40% increase in the productivity in this project area. The productivity is

less due to the traditional practices and low quality of seeds used in the farming. The comparative graph is given below:



Crop-2: RED-GRAM (TUR):

During the PRA and the survey, it was known that maximum lands are utilized to cultivate the red-gram (locally named Tur) after that of land

used for maize. The productivity of the red-gram is good compared to the productivity of the world but it’s still less than the productivity of the state

and district. Hence there is a little scope to increase the productivity through promoting the improved agriculture practices in the project area. The

traditional practice i.e. unawareness about the improved agricultural practices and low rain fall in the last three years in the farming area becomes the

obstacle to increase the productivity. The comparative graph is given below:



Crop-3: PADDY (DANGAR):

Locally the paddy is named as dangar. The productivity is very low as compare to the world level. The world productivity is 3033 kg/ha where

as the productivity of the project area is only 800 kg/ ha. Paddy requires high rain water/ irrigation facilities to make substantial productivity. The

area lies under the low rain fed area. Hence the productivity of the area is low. The comparative graph is given below:



Crop-4: WHEAT:

Maximum land has been used in the cultivation of wheat in the winter (RABI) season. The productivity of the wheat is less as compare to the

productivity of the world but it’s less than the productivity of the country and state. Hence there is a large scope to increase the productivity through

promoting the improved agriculture practices in the project area. The traditional practice i.e. unaware about the improved agricultural practices and

less use of irrigation facilities in the farming becomes the obstacle to increase the productivity. The comparative graph is given below:



PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION:

After analysis all the information collected during PRA exercise and field to field survey, the main problems was identified as follows:

• Sudden decline of rainfall in the project area (near about 70 % decrease i.e. 1072mm (2006) where as 374mm (2009)

• Declining size of avg. land holdings (max. less than 2 acre )

• The agriculture pattern is highly vulnerable due to soil erosion and depletion of water table in the project area

• Low production due to practices of traditional method of cultivation.



CHAPTER - 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED



WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED

Watershed Development Strategy

Watershed is a geo-hydrological and biological unit draining through a common point called outlet. It is a dynamic system of living and non-

living things. It simply described as development of physical and biological elements for sustainable and self-reliant interdependence. It is obvious

that watershed development is the overall development of all the constituents of a watershed. Such a development can be achieved through a

complete understanding of a system and sub-system of the watershed. Hence, the exploration of all the elements of a watershed becomes an important

component of watershed planning so as to efficiently address the needs of all the dependants.

Soil and water conservation remains the core activity. Soil conservation mainly means conserving and protecting the soil from wind or water

erosion. It also means improving the microbial activities in the soil and making it "live.". Water conservation will be achieved through both

engineering and biological measures. In addition to soil and water conservation, watershed development project ought to address several issues for

achieving sustainable development. Adoption of the following strategies can ensure sustainable watershed development. Scientific planning with

participatory approach is only and one method to make the programme successful.

4.1 Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

The project villages are selected to see the micro-watershed and this project follows the cluster approach mean near to another. The IWMP-11

Project consists of eight micro-watersheds named 5E1B7c3e, 5E1B7d2f, 5E1B7d2e, 5E1B7d2c, 5E1B7c1i, 5E1B7c3d, 5E1B7d2b, 5E1B7c2d as their

respective codes. The project consists of Eleven villages named Rinchhiya, Ladpur, Chundadi, Sankali, Gadh,Parvadi,Vavdi bujarg(Part),Thana garjan,

Tajpur,Jafrabad(part) and Lilesara.

ii) Base line Survey/ Household survey:

To understand the family dynamics of watershed community, household survey often play a key role in the process of planning. Community based



information is assessed through PRA, which gives the family based information. Household survey includes the developing questionnaires and

obtaining information for surveying the household from the villages. Census survey is adopted to collect the data in this project.

iii. Secondary data

The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports.

Secondary data related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments of Government agencies such as Revenue Office,

Primary Health Center, Regional Marketing Center, Regional Forest Center (Van Sanrakshan Samiti), District Rural development Agency initiative-

SGSY Programme office, working on poverty alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc. Climatic information like annual

rainfall with weekly distribution, temperature of five year is collected from the Irrigation and Agriculture department of Godhra.

b) Technical/ Field to field Survey: To know the land classification, texture, erodability and slope of field to field survey was also carried out in the

farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also includes the soil profiles, numbers of water harvesting structure in the

area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. For the ridge –valley planning the field to field

survey is carried on.

While implementing the project it is necessary that the treatments are carried out starting form ridge and progressing towards the valley. This

approach is followed with the following objectives Protect the upper reaches to avoid erosion and reduce runoff. Avoid siltation of structures in the

middle and lower catchments. Ensure the cost effectiveness of structures in the valley and Improve overall efficacy of the measures.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This

has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for

any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the

physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated

questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops,



various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. The whole process is documented in the village committee resister.

Problems Identification

After analysis all the information collected during PRA exercise and field to field survey, the main problems was identified such as follows:

Problem in drinking water facilities

Low production due to practices of traditional method of cultivation

Low milk production due to local/ non descript breed and less availability of fodder

Low economic condition due to low production

Soil Erosion from farm land

Less cultivation of vegetables

Lack of value addition practices

Less availability of fodder

Market availability (No nearby)

Migration

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study of natural resources and helps in planning water resources development. One of the

greatest advantages of using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information in spatial and

temporal domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various

stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil,

BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the



DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each

and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a

scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modeling

Hydrology modeling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow accumulation. This model is

overlaid on cadastral map to help to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error

which generally occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes



Online IT connectivity between

Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

DRDA and SLNA Yes

SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

Cadastral map Yes

Village boundaries Yes

Drainage Yes

Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes

Land use Yes

Ground water status Yes

Watershed boundaries Yes

Activity Yes

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

Weather Station

Yes

Inputs

Bio-pesticides Yes

Organic manures Yes

Vermicompost Yes



Bio-fertilizer Yes

Water saving devices Yes

Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

Bio-fencing Yes

Nutrient budgeting Yes

Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers

4.2. Institution Building

The watershed development project has a great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community. Considering

the needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved in a skills up gradation

programme. People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable development and social equity. Such

organizations must have representations from representations from socially backward communities and women with separate special interest

groups. Within group interactions across group interactions and representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged

groups to become a part of mainstream development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the

resources developed at the community level.



Table No. 31-Details of PRA Activities Conducted in the Project Area

Sr. No Name of PRA Activities/FGD Date Number of

People Present Lessons Learnt/Understanding of Problems/Situation

1. Rinchhiya

Social Mapping

12/09/2011 to 13/09/2011

2.94% SC/ST Population (Nayka) Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 916 Literacy Rate – 62% Women have Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping

Major sources of Income in Agriculture & Animal Husbandry

Drinking Water Sources from open wells & head pump

Drinking Water available for 10 Month but Some Faliyas have Problems for Drinking Water

Villages Face severe drinking Water Problems in Summer

Sudden Decline of Rain fall in Project area (Near About 70% Decrease i.e. 1072 mm (2006) Where as 374 mm (2009)

Average Land Holding -1 Acre 100% Forest Area Agriculture Land Allotted by Forest Dept.

Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source

Open Well River Pond Average 15% Irrigation Facilities in Winter

Sessions No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 10 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine use for Irrigation Facilities



Agriculture

Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc Less use Machinery for Cultivation Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology Thin Soil Depth Average 90 to 120 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have

Slope & No Farm Bund No Sufficient Trees on Farm Boundary Animal Husbandry

Poor Healthy Cattle Low Milk Production (Average 2 to 3 Lt Per Day) No Fodder & Feed available in Summer No Develop AI Technology Less Medical Checkup & Vaccination Camp for Cattle

Focused Group Discussion

Less Vegetables Farming Villagers Interested in Horticulture, Floriculture &

Vegetable Growing Village Women Interested in Vermi-compost,

Nurseries, AH, Kitchen Garden & Small Micro Enterprise

Project Areas Women have Social Rules & Regulation

Women Demand for more Employment in Project Village

Seasonal Mapping

80 to 90 % Rain Fed Area Agriculture in Monsoon & Ravi Season No Agriculture in Summer Season 50% Maize , 10% Wheat, 20% Paddy,10% Tur, &

10% Vegetable Crop in project Area Migration Period in half Winter & Summer



Village Women Working in Agriculture activity & House Wives are free from afternoon after their work in the Morning Session.

Soil Mapping

60 to 70 % Black Shadow Soil 10 to 15 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 15 to 20 % Soil Mix with stone soil 0 to 20 % Flat to Moderate Slope Soil Erosion from Farm Land, & Forest Land Less Vegetative Cover

2. Sankali

Social Mapping

19/09/2011 to 20/09/2011

47

36.72% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Vahuniya, Sanghodiya, Harijan)

Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 1002 Literacy Rate – 64% Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping

Major Resources of Income in Agriculture & Animal Husbandry



Villages Face Drinking Water Problems in Summer Sudden Decline of Rain fall in Project area (Near

About 70% Decrease i.e. 1072 mm (2006) Where as 374 mm (2009)

Average Land Holding -1 Acre

Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source

Open Well River Pond



Average 20% Irrigation Facilities in Winter Sessions

No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 16 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine use for Irrigation Facilities Agriculture

Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc Less mechanization in Cultivation Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology Thin Soil Depth Average 90 to 120 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have






Nurseries, AH & Kitchen Garden Project Areas Women have Social Rules &

Regulation Women Demand for more Employment in Project

Village

Seasonal Mapping 80 to 90 % Rain Fed Area Agriculture in Monsoon & Ravi Season



No Agriculture in Summer Season 50% Maize , 10% Wheat, 20% Paddy,10% Tur, &

10% Other Crop in project Area Migration Period in half Winter & Summer Village Women Working in Agriculture activity &

House Wives are free from afternoon after their work in the Morning Session.

Soil Mapping

30 to 40 % Black Shadow Soil 40 to 50 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 10 to 15 % Soil Mix with stone soil 0 to 15 % Flat to Moderate Slope Soil Erosion from Farm Land & Community Land Less Vegetative Cover

Ladpur

Social Mapping

15/09/2011 to 16/09/2011

49

37.27% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Patel, Sanghodiya, Harijan)


Resource Mapping







Transect Walk Observation



Irrigation Source


Sessions No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 16 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine & Some People Use Electric Motor for

Irrigation Facilities Agriculture

Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat, Vegetable etc

Less use Machinery for Cultivation Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed but

less People use Certified Agriculture seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology Thin Soil Depth Average 70 to 110 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have






Nurseries, AH , Kitchen Garden & Small Micro



Enterprise Project Areas Women have Social Rules &


Village

Seasonal Mapping


10% Other Crop in project Area Migration Period in half Winter & Summer Village Women Working in Agriculture & Home

Wife in Morning Session then Free from Afternoon

Soil Mapping


Chundadi Social Mapping

22/09/2011 to 23/09/2011

59

0% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Patel, Harijan)

Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land.

Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali

High Expenditure on Social Occasions

Sex Ratio – 961

Literacy Rate – 49%

Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping Major Resources of Income in Agriculture & Animal

Husbandry








Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source


Sessions No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 15 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine use for Irrigation Facilities Agriculture



Poor Healthy Cattle Low Milk Production (Average 2 to 3 Lt Per Day)



No Fodder & Feed available in Summer No Develop AI Technology Less Medical Checkup & Vaccination Camp for Cattle






Village

Seasonal Mapping




Soil Mapping

40 to 50 % Black Shadow Soil 20 to 25 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 10 to 15 % Soil Mix with stone soil 0 to 17 % Flat to Moderate Slope Soil Erosion from Farm Land, Forest Land &

Community Land Less Vegetative Cover

Gadh Social Mapping 24/09/2011 to

25/09/2011 53

4.08% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Harijan)

Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 998 Literacy Rate – 55%



Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping







Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source




Slope & No Farm Bund No Sufficient Trees on Farm Boundary



Animal Husbandry







Village

Seasonal Mapping




Soil Mapping



Parvadi Social Mapping 26/09/2011 to

27/09/2011 64

16.51% SC/ST Population (Nayka, Damor) Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali



High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 972 Literacy Rate – 62% Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping






Average Land Holding -1 Acre 100% Forest Area Agriculture Land Allotted by Forest Dept.

Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source



Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc Less use Machinery for Cultivation Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology



Thin Soil Depth Average 90 to 120 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have





Vegetable Growing Village Women are Interested in Vermi-compost,

Nurseries, AH, Kitchen Garden & Small Micro Enterprise


Women Demand more Employment in Project Village

Seasonal Mapping


10% Vegetable Crop in project Area Migration Period in half Winter & Summer Village Women Working in Agriculture activity &


Soil Mapping

60 to 70 % Black Shadow Soil 10 to 15 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil 15 to 20 % Soil Mix with stone soil 0 to 20 % Flat to Moderate Slope Soil Erosion from Farm Land, & Forest Land



Less Vegetative Cover

Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

Social Mapping 29/09/2011 to

30/09/2011 47

43.33% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Vahuniya, Sanghodiya, Harijan)


Resource Mapping







Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source



Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat etc Less use Machinery for Cultivation



Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology Thin Soil Depth Average 90 to 120 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have








Village

Seasonal Mapping




Soil Mapping 30 to 40 % Black Shadow Soil 40 to 50 % Red & Brown (Goradu) Soil



10 to 15 % Soil Mix with stone soil 0 to 15 % Flat to Moderate Slope Soil Erosion from Farm Land & Community Land Less Vegetative Cover

Thanagarjan Social Mapping 06/10/2011 to 07/010/2011

49

00% SC/ST Population Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 911 Literacy Rate – 67% Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping







Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source


Sessions No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 16 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine & Some People Use Electric Motor for

Irrigation Facilities Agriculture



Major Crops Like Maize, Paddy, Tur, Wheat, Vegetable etc

Less use Machinery for Cultivation Maximum Use local Varity of Agriculture Seed but

less People use Certified Agriculture seed Low Productivity of Crops No Market Linkage Un known About Modern Technology Thin Soil Depth Average 70 to 110 cm No Moisture Conduct in Farm Because Farm have






Nurseries, AH , Kitchen Garden & Small Micro Enterprise


Women Demand for more Employment in Project Village

Seasonal Mapping


10% Other Crop in project Area Migration Period in half Winter & Summer



Village Women Working in Agriculture activity & House Wives are free from afternoon after their work in the Morning Session.

Soil Mapping


Tajpur Social Mapping 09/10/2011 to

10/10/2011 59

00% SC/ST Population Mostly Separate house in your Farm Land. Main Festivals:- Holi, Diwali High Expenditure on Social Occasions Sex Ratio – 926 Literacy Rate – 49% Women have a Social Rules & Regulations

Resource Mapping







Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source


Sessions



No Irrigation Facilities in Summer 15 mt Below Ground Water Table Oil Machine use for Irrigation Facilities Agriculture









Village

Seasonal Mapping






Soil Mapping



Jafrabad(Part) Social Mapping 03/10/2011 to

04/10/2011 53

3.76% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Harijan)


Resource Mapping







Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source













Village



Seasonal Mapping




Soil Mapping



Lilesara Social Mapping 12/10/2011 to

13/10/2011 53

77.29% SC/ST Population (Bhil, Rathava, Nayka, Damor, Harijan, Megvad)


Resource Mapping









Transect Walk

Observation

Irrigation Source













Village

Seasonal Mapping




Soil Mapping





LOW SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS

Poor life style Migration

Local self Governance not dynamic or inclusive

Unemployment Low Income

Lack of common interest to support

and strength the local Governance

Low Market Price of the Product

Local leadership not sufficiently

developed

Low Literacy Status

Less orientation for self employment

Lack of co-

operation between farmers

Lack of appropriate

market linkage

Presence of

middle man

Lack of Entrepreneurial

skill

Lack of Information and training

Lack of Grass root

Peoples organisation

s

Low representation of weakest in real

term

Low Agricultural Production

Poor Cropping Pattern

Less Fertile Soil

Lack of resourc

e for irrigatio

n

Natural Misfortunes

Lack of irrigation Facilities

Less availability of water

Soil Erosion

Problem Tree Analysis Chart



IMPROVE SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS

Improve life style Migration Reduction

Local self Governance not dynamic or inclusive

Employment Generation Maximum Income

Local NGO & Government

working village

Max. Market Price of the Product

Community Development &

leadership Development

sufficiently developed

Improved Literacy Status

Capacity Building Training,

Demonstration for Self Empoyment

Co-operation between farmers

& Market

Market linkage

Develop the Processing

Unit

Skill Development for Occupsonal Worker Wadi,

Vegetable Growing Nursery Rising, Micro

Entrepreneurial

Workshop, training

Programme

Grass root Watershed Committee

Working

Presentation Highlight of

Development Plan in every People

Improve Agricultural Production

Adopted Morden

Technology

Horticulture Floriculture

Vegetable Growing Varmicompost

Water Harvesting

Structure, Well Recharge for irrigation Facilities

Soil & Moisture Conservation Work for Soil

Erosion

Fodder Development

Cattle Feed

Cattle Camp, AI, & Vaccination

Milk Collection Centre

Object Tree Analysis



I) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the

secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in the Project Villages of the IWMP-11 of Panchmahal.

There are 11 watershed committees formed under the project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT, MDT. The

watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. The registration process was completed and the

details of the watershed committee as are follows. The details of the watershed committee members are given in the Annexure-1.

Table no.32: Watershed Committee details

Sr. No.

Names of WCs

Registration No and Date of

Registration as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other Educational qualification

Function/s assigned#

1 Rinchhiya W/C Committee

(Under Process)

President M √ √ 12th Pass A,B,D,E,I

Secretary M √ √ 12th Pass A,B,C,E,D,H,I

Member M-6 2 3 3 7th Pass A,B.E.I.

Member F-3 1 3 1 2 1 4th Pass A,B.E.I.

2 Sankali W/C Committee

(Under Process)

President M √ √ √ 12th Pass A,B,D,E,I

Secretary M √ √ 12th Pass A,B,C,E,D,H,I

Member M-8 2 4 4 2 7th Pass A,B.E.I.

Member F-3 1 2 1 1 4th Pass A,B.E.I.

3 Ladpur (Under Process) President M √ √ A,B,D,E,I



W/C Committee

Secretary M √ √ A,B,C,E,D,H,I

Member M-5 1 5 1 1 A,B.E.I.

Member F-5 1 4 1 1

4

Gadh Chundadi W/C Committee

(Under Process)

President M √ √ A,B,D,E,I


Member M-7 A,B.E.I.

Member F-4 A,B.E.I.

5 Parvadi W/C Committee

(Under Process)


Secretary M √ √ √ A,B,C,E,D,H,I

Member M-6 3 3 2 1 1 A,B.E.I.

Member F-3 1 3 1 1 A,B.E.I.

6

Vavdi Bujarg(Part) W/C Committee

(Under Process)



Member M-6 2 2 4 1 1 A,B.E.I.

Member F-4 1 4 1 A,B.E.I.

7 Thanagarjan W/C Committee

(Under Process)



Member M-6 1 3 2 1 1 A,B.E.I.

Member F-4 1 3 1 2 1 A,B.E.I.

8 Tajpur W/C Committee

(Under Process) President M √ √ A,B,D,E,I




Member M-5 4 1 1 A,B.E.I.

Member F-4 4 1 1 A,B.E.I.

9

Jafrabad (Part) W/C Committee

(Under Process)

President F √ √ A,B,D,E,I


Member M-4 1 1 2 1 3 A,B.E.I.

Member F-6 5 1 2 1 A,B.E.I.

10 Lilesara W/C Committee

(Under Process)


Secretary M √ √ √ A,B,C,E,D,H,I

Member M-5 1 3 1 1 √ A,B.E.I.

Member F-5 1 3 1 3 1 1 A,B.E.I.

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for ‘J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned A. PLA and PRA B. Planning C. Maintains of Accounts D. Signing of cheque and marking payments E. Supervision of construction activists F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (Please specify).



ANNEXURE-1 NAME OF THE WATERSHED COMMITTEE MEMBERS OF IWMP-11, PANCHMAHAL

1. Name of the Watershed Committee: Rinchhiya Jarstrav Samiti

Registration No Society Act: Watershed Dev. Grant A/C No.: Registration No Trust Act: Watershed Dev. Fund A/C No.:

Sr. No Name of the Members Designation

1 Patal Budhabhai Mangalbhai President

2 Patel Pravinbhai Bharatsinh Secretry

3 Pagi Aravindbhai Ratanbhai Member

4 Patel Mangalbhai Shakarabhai Member

5 Patel Fatabhai Ratnabhai Member

6 Patel Rameshbhai Chimanbhai Member

7 Patel Rameshbhai Vadhabhai Member

8 Patel Savitaben Mohanbhai Member

9 Nayak Dhulabhai Manjibhai Member

10 Patel Bhanuben Dineshbhai Member

11 Pagi Parvatiben Ramanbhai Member

12 Patel Ramatiben Rajeshbhai Member

13 Vanker Dhurabhai Ishwarbhai WDT Member



2. Name of the Watershed Committee: Sankali Jarstrav Samiti



1 Nayak Rayajibhai Shanabhai President

2 Patel Harsadbhai Kiranbhai Secretry

3 Patel Mohanbhai Shankarbhai Member

4 Patel Aratbhai Kabhsinh Member

5 Patel Lilaben Samarsinh Member

6 Baria Rameshbhai Bhurabhai Member

7 Baria Madhuben Khumansinh Member

8 Nayak Subhatraben Prabhatbhai Member

9 Sandhada Mohanbhai Sonabhai Member

10 Sandhada Prabhatbhai Sonabhai Member

11 Nayak Ramanbhai Shankarbhai Member

12 Patel Maheshbhai Arjunbhai Member




3. Name of the Watershed Committee: Jafarabad Jarstrav Samiti



1 Pallaviben Nimeshbhai Patel President

2 Hareshbhai Batharbhai Baria Secretry

3 Bhanuben Hareshbhai Baria Member

4 Anadiben Sureshbhai Baria Member

5 Ganpatsinh Raysinh Baria Member

6 Mohanbhai Bhurabhai Baria Member

7 Dhulabhai Somabhai Bhoi Member

8 Gitaben Somabhai Baria Member

9 Mohanbhai Babarbhai Solanki Member

10 Bhanuben Arjunsinh Baria Member

11 Dariyaben Salambhai Baria Member

12 Narvatbhai Mahsukhbhai Bhil Member




4. Name of the Watershed Committee: Thanagarjan Jarstrav Samiti



1 Patel Dalsukhbhai Balvantbhai President

2 Patel Nandubhai Jasubhai Secretry

3 Patel Prabhatbhai Sayababhai Member

4 Patel Himmatbhai Bijalbhai Member

5 Patel Kamalsinh Balvantsinh Member

6 Patel Chandanbhai Dalpatbhai Member

7 Patel Kantibhai Bhurabhai Member

8 Nayak Kalubhai Chemabhai Member

9 Nayak Paniben Bhudarbhai Member

10 Patel Jashodaben Bhavansinh Member

11 Patel Narmadaben Ganpatbhai Member

12 Patel Sumitraben Kiranbhai Member




5. Name of the Watershed Committee: Ladpur Jarstrav Samiti



1 Patel Babubhai Bhalajibhai President

2 Patel Chhatrasinh Ramsinh Secretary

3 Patel Rajansinh Balvantsinh Member

4 Patel Kokilaben Himmatsinh Member

5 Patel Kantaben Dolatsinh Member

6 Patel Bakubhai Bhavabhai Member

7 Patel Sardarbhai Danabhai Member

8 Nayaka Savitaben Sursingbhai Member

9 Parmar Danabhai Hirabhai Member

10 Patel Kamalaben Manursinh Member

11 Patel Saniben Mohanbhai Member

12 Patel Maheshbhai Shankarbhai Member




6. Name of the Watershed Committee: Vavdi Bujarg Jarstrav Samiti



1 Rathod Darmendrasinh Jashvantsinh President

2 Parmar Jasvantbhai Salambhai Secretary

3 Baria Kanubhai Udesinh Member

4 Raulaji Dilipsinh Somsinh Member

5 Jadav Ilaben Dhupendrasinh Member

6 Sharma Gitaben Ramlal Member

7 Patel Aswinbhai Jashubhai Member

8 Patel Savitaben Gorajibhai Member

9 Malivad Bakabhai Chhaganbhai Member

10 Panada Lilaben Punambhai Member

11 Bhuriya Laxmanbhai Rayjibhai Member

12 Chhtrasinh Jesingbhai Member




7. Name of the Watershed Committee: Tajpur Jarstrav Samiti



1 Baria Udesinh Mansinh President

2 Baria Pratapbhai Rupsingbhai Secretary

3 Baria Vallubhai Raysing Member

4 Baria Titabhai Chhaganbhai Member

5 Baria Vajabhai Motibhai Member

6 Baria Sakariben Udesinh Member

7 Baria Bhanuben Ramjibhai Member

8 Baria Budhesinh Ukarbhai Member

9 Baria Ambikaben Shaileshbhai Member

10 Baria Savitaben Balvantbhai Member

11 Baria Chhaganbhai Dalsukhbhai Member




8. Name of the Watershed Committee: Lileshara Jarstrav Samiti



1 Baria Chimanbhai Gemabhai President

2 Vasava Shankarbhai Jagubhai Secretary

3 Raheman Kasmira Soyab Abdul Member

4 Baria Udesinh Ramabhai Member

5 Baria Dashrathbhai Chhaganbhai Member

6 Raheman Kasmira Shamimbanu Abdul Member

7 Baria Mangalbhai Bhayjibhai Member

8 Nayak Kaliben Chunabhai Member

9 Gitaben Dhanabhai Member

10 Nayak Kantibhai Bhayajibhai Member

11 Nayak Sakuntlaben Shankarbhai Member




9. Name of the Watershed Committee: Paravadi Jarstrav Samiti



1 Patel Amarsinh Somabhai President

2 Charel Rajubhai Chandubhai Secretary

3 Patel Bhalsinh Dhirabhai Member

4 Pagi Vijaybhai Savabhai Member

5 Patel Dhanabhai Mansukhbhai Member

6 Raval Jasiben Kishorbhai Member

7 Patel Premilaben Bijalbhai Member

8 Mahida Shankarbhai Bhayjibhai Member

9 Panada Kanubhai Shanabhai Member

10 Ninama Shardaben Rameshbhai Member

11 Patel Gulabbhai Ratnabhai Member




10. Name of the Watershed Committee: Gadh Chundadi Jarstrav Samiti



1 Nayak Pratabsingh Amarsingh President

2 Patel Hasmukhbhai Ramsingh Secretary

3 Patel Vaghabhai Raiji Member

4 Patel Aaratbhai Punabhai Member

5 Patel Rameshbhai Himatbhai Member

6 Patel Chandrasingh Vajesingh Member

7 Patel Preetiben Dhabhsingh Member

8 Nayak Khabhsingh Laxmanbhai Member

9 Raval Simtaben Mukeshbhai Member

10 Patel Surajben Bhupatbhai Member

11 Patel Sumitraben Manharbhai Member

12 Raval Sanjaykumar Pravinbhai Member




ii) Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are self motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. Self

help group initiative especially for helping out women to uplift their livelihood. Generally self help group include landless and marginal sized farmer

women, BPL household, SC/ST women.

SHG initiative in this watershed was being organized by having a focused group discussion between various homogenous communities of women

based on their liveli hood separately. Each group discussed their basic problems with their facilitators. The major problems identified are:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal credible financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude towards savings among poor people due to complex and rigid conventional financial institution structures.

d) Lack of small micro-loans without collaterals and high interest rates.

e) Lack of knowledge on credit, thrift activity and banking.

With a view point of these problems it was planned to organize these women to into a group consisting of 12 to 20 in each groups and it was

also proposed to have 5 groups per village will be formed.

It was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities, which

will promote women empowerment this included padiya patara, Garments making, Chock Production, and Vermicompost activates with forward and

backward linkage. This will ultimately lead into better human development in the village.



Table no. 33: Self Help Group Details

Name of Village

S. No.

Total no. of formed SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

With only Men

With only

Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Rinchhiya 1 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless 0 2 2

(ii) SF 20 20 1 5 5

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 2 0 2 22 22 1 1 5 5

Sankali 2 3 2 0 5

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 34 23 57 31 11 42 20 10 30

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 3 2 5

Ladpur 3 0 1 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 11 11 6 6 11 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 1 1 11 11 6 6 11 11

Chundadi 4 0 2 0 2

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 22 22 1 1

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 2 2 22 22 1 1

Gadh 5 0 3 0 3 (i) Landless



(ii) SF 35 35 12 12 23 23

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 0 3 0 3 35 35 12 12 23 23

Parvadi 6 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 11 11 11 11 11 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11

Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

7 4 0 0 4

(i) Landless 44 44 44 44 44 44

(ii) SF

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 4 0 0 4 44 44 44 44 44 44

Thanagarjan 8 3 2 0 5

(i) Landless 11 11 7 7

(ii) SF 34 34 8 8

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 3 2 0 5 45 45 8 8 7 7

Tajpur 9 1 1 0 2

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 11 11 22 11 11

(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 1 1 0 2 11 11 11 11 11

Jafrabad(Part) 10 1 0 0 1 (i) Landless

(ii) SF 11 11 1 1



(iii) MF

(iv) LF

Total 1 0 0 1 11 11 1 1

Lilesara 11 1 3 0 4 (i) Landless 33 33 33 33 12 31 43

Total 1 3 0 4 12 33 45 6 57 63 14 31 45

iii) User Groups

These are homogeneous groups of persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or

asset on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user

group in the villages of the IWMP-11 project are:

In Cash of a check dam, Land Leveling, Farm Bundling, Roof Well Recharge, Kitchen Garden, Demonstration Plot, Contour Trench, Ring Bund,

Soil Bund, Staggered Tracheas etc all the beneficiaries of the individual and community activities where involved as user group members.

In Cash of a Check Wall and Gully Plug all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam where involved as user group members.

Membership was on voluntary and democratic.

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It was

decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.



Table no. 34: User Group detail

Name of Village

S. No. Total no. of UGs Formed No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Rinchhiya 1 1 1 3 5

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 14 17 31 - - - 4 5 9

(iii) MF 11 08 19 - - - 3 4 7 (iv) LF - - -

Total 1 1 3 5 25 25 50 - - - 7 9 16

Sankali 2 2 1 3 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 22 12 34 4 2 6 3 2 5

(iii) MF 18 8 26 1 0 1 2 1 3 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 1 3 6 40 20 60 5 2 7 5 3 8

Ladpur 3 2 0 4 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 24 8 32 13 2 15 8 5 13

(iii) MF 21 7 28 1 2 3 4 3 7 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 0 4 6 45 15 60 14 4 18 12 8 20

Chundadi 4 1 0 3 4

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 19 7 26 - - - - - -

(iii) MF 11 3 14 - - - - - - (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 1 0 3 4 30 10 40 - - - - - -

Gadh 5 2 1 3 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 25 12 37 12 2 14 7 5 12

(iii) MF 15 8 23 - - - 5 2 7 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 1 3 6 40 20 60 12 2 14 12 7 19 Parvadi 6 2 1 4 7 (i) Landless - - - - - - - - -



(ii) SF 26 14 40 12 6 18 9 3 12 (iii) MF 19 11 30 2 2 4 5 1 6 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 1 4 7 45 25 70 14 8 22 14 4 18

Vavdi Bujarg(Part)

7 3 1 3 7

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 32 13 45 2 2 4 4 2 6

(iii) MF 18 7 25 0 0 0 4 3 7 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 3 1 3 7 50 20 70 2 2 4 8 5 13

Thanagarjan 8 2 1 3 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 28 9 37 6 2 8 3 2 5

(iii) MF 17 6 23 3 2 5 2 2 4 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 1 3 6 45 15 60 9 4 13 5 4 9

Tajpur 9 2 1 2 5

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 18 9 27 - - - 8 5 13

(iii) MF 17 6 23 - - - 6 4 10 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 2 1 2 5 35 15 50 - - - 14 9 23

Jafrabad(Part) 10 3 1 2 6

(i) Landless - - - - - - - - - (ii) SF 28 8 36 8 6 14 10 8 18

(iii) MF 17 7 24 6 5 11 8 3 11 (iv) LF - - - - - - - - -

Total 3 1 2 6 45 15 60 14 11 25 18 11 29

Lilesara 11 3 1 4

8 (i) Landless - - - - - - - - -

(ii) SF 33 12 45 5 3 8 11 5 16 (iii) MF 27 8 35 2 1 3 3 3 6

(iv) LF - - - - - - - - - Total 3 1 4 8 60 20 80 7 4 11 14 8 22



Table No. 34.1: The following types of groups were planned to be formed in the villages of the IWMP-11 watershed

Sr. no Name of User Group Major Task

1 Gully Plug Equitable sharing of Soil Management

2 Land Leveling Equitable sharing of soil Management

3 Farm bund Equitable sharing of resources

Assuring of proper work

4 Check Wall Equitable sharing of soil and Water Management

Development of community land for fodder development

6 Check Dam Equitable sharing of Water Management to up ground water table and Built up water

Storage Capacity

7 Afforestation Develop Forest area and Fuel Material

8 Horticulture Increase Livelihood

10 Demonstration Plot Demo to Village People Modern Agriculture system and High Production

12 Floriculture Improve and purpose of livelihood

13 Vegetable Farming Improve modern technology and purpose of livelihood

14 Fishery Improve modern technology and purpose of livelihood

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-11

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of watershed

Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed

committee regarding the EPA activity; the total amounts i.e. 4 percent of the total amount was conveyed to the committee and finalize the EPA for the

villages. After the discussion of the need of the villages, the guidelines for the EPA were considered and the following EPA were planned for the



Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures Rs.in lakh)

S. No.

Project Name

Names of Villages

Amount earmarked

for EPA

Entry Point Activities planned

No. of unit

Planed

Estimated cost

IWMP Fund

Convergence Fund

Expected outcome

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya 2.053 Causeway 1 Nos 2.053 2.053 00 Connectivity to School

Total 2.053 2.053 2

Sankali 3.476 Causeway 1 Nos 3.476 3.476 00 Connectivity to School

Total 3.476 3.476

3 Ladpur 1.199

Community well Repairing

1 Nos 1.199 1.199 00 Connectivity to Dayra

Faliya Total 1.199 1.199

4 Chundadi 1.843

Causeway 1 Nos 1.843 1.843 00 Connectivity to Talav


5 Gadh 1.849

Causeway 1 Nos 1.343 1.343 00 Connectivity to Bariya


6 Parvadi 1.693

Causeway 1 Nos 1.190 1.190 00 Connectivity to post Office

Faliya

Causeway 1 Nos 0.503 0.503 00 Connectivity to Charel

Faliya Total Total 1.693 1.693 00

7 Vavdi Bujarg (Part)

3.859 Check Dam Repairing 1 Nos 2.100 2.100 00

Survey No-168 , Near Bhuriya Kalubhai Gamabhai’s House

Check Dam Repairing 1 Nos 1.759 1.759 00 Survey No-181 Total 3.859 3.859 00

8 Thanagarjan 3.198

Causeway 1 Nos 3.198 3.198 00 Connectivity to Navi

Vasahat Faliya Total 3.198 3.198

9 Tajpur 1.595 Community well Repairing

1 Nos 1.595 1.595 00 Connectivity to Natapur

Faliya



Total 1.595 1.595 10

Jafrabad(Part) 0.930 Causeway 1 Nos 0.930 0.930 00 Connectivity to School

Total 0.930 0.930

11 Lilesara 2.690

Causeway 1 Nos 2.690 2.690 00 Connectivity to Avas


4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

The physical treatments are to be carried on during the watershed development work phase. While implementing the project it is necessary

that the treatments are carried out starting form ridge and progressing towards the valley. This approach is followed with the following objectives:

Protect the upper reaches to avoid erosion and reduce runoff

Avoid siltation of structures in the middle and lower catchments.

Ensure the cost effectiveness of structures in the valley and

Improve overall efficacy of the measures.

Mainly the watershed development works are divided into three stages such as ridge area treatments, Slope treatment, Plains or flat level (Area

treatment) and Drainage line treatments, Different treatments are planned for each village to see the geographical and socio economic condition of

that specific area. The details are briefly described below:

A. Ridge Area Treatment Plans

For the ridge area treatment of project villages area following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the villagers, watershed

committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest.

1. Gully Plug

2. Check Wall

3. Contour Trenches

4. Staggered Trenches



B. Slope Treatment

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water

conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labor intensive, will involve more of manual labour, so, funds from National Rural

Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) can be taken.

Following structures are been proposed in these areas

a. Land Leveling

b. Afforestation

c. Earthen Bund

C. Plains or Flat Level Treatment:

These are at field level of farmers where farmers are operating at a very high labour intensive way. These generally field bunding, crop pattern

alteration. The prime aim is to conserve the rain in the field. In this area stone bunding is not feasible due to unavailability of stone in the local area. So

in the plain or flat level treatment the two things are proposed as under.

1. Farm Bund

2. Afforestation/ Afforestation

D. Water conservation Structures and activity:

The activities are generally taken in the bottom area/ valley region of the watershed area. The structures will help in the storage of the water which

increases the soil moisture and water table of the area. Land can be irrigated through these structures. The proposed structures are as follows:

1. Check Dam

2. Check Wall



Details of the physical structure proposed in the project IWMP-11, Panchmahal

Physical Structure

As per the survey and the interaction with villagers of I.W.M.P – 11 Projects it was found that Percolation tank and farm pond is not the suit

table structure under surface water recharge structure. Farm pond is not feasible due to small land holding of the project area and the percolation

tank is also not possible due to low slope.

The Check dams are proposed in the Check Wall (Kotar) and Gully Plug and Check Wall are also proposed to product the soil and water from runoff. These Structures also helps in surface water recharging. The Details of the check dam and other structures are detailed below:- Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

Target

Sr. No

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

No. of units (No./ cu.m., rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)

M W O T

Rinchiya Contour

Trenches Yes - - - - Forest UG

2400 rmt

0 1.20 0.00 1.20

0 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

1 Staggered trenches

Yes - - - - Forest UG 4360 Nos

0 2.18 0.00 2.18 March 2012-13 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Farm bunds

- - Yes Yes - - UG 5095 rmt


Land

Leveling - - Yes Yes - - UG

12 ha

0 1.08 0.00 1.08 March 2012-13

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes - 4 ha 0 0.52 0 0.52 June 2013-14



Check Wall - Yes - Yes - Forest UG 5

Nos 4.05 2.70 0 6.75

March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Nala Plug - Yes Yes Yes Yes - UG 10

Nos 3.60 2.40 0 6.00

March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Gully plug - Yes - Yes - - UG 19

Nos 1.49 0.98 0.00 2.47

March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Protection

Wall - Yes - Yes - - UG

2 Nos

1.08 0.72 00 1.80 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Total 10.22 13.92 0.00 24.1

4

2 Sankali Contour


2500 rmt

0 1.25 0.00 1.25 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Staggered trenches


0 2.28 0.00 2.28 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Field

bunds - - Yes Yes - - UG

2400 rmt

0 1.008 0.00 1.00

8 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


17.50 ha

0 1.175 0.00 1.17

5 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Earthan

Dam - - Yes Yes - - UG

1 Nos

0 0.35 0 0.35 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes Forest -

16 ha

1.25 0.83 0 2.08 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Check Wall - Yes - Yes - - UG 13 nos

11.86 7.90 0 19.7

6

March 2012-13 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Nala Plug - Yes Yes Yes Yes - UG 6 nos 2.16 1.44 0 3.60 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Gully plug - Yes - Yes - - UG 19

Nos 1.49 0.98 0.00 2.47

March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Protection

Wall - Yes - Yes - - UG

2 Nos

1.08 0.72 00 1.80 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Total 17.84 17.93 0.00 35.7



7

3 Ladpur Contour


950 rmt

0 0.475 0.00 0.47

5 March 2012-13

Staggered trenches


0 0.775 0.00 0.77

5 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Field


3197 rmt

0 1.34 0.00 1.34 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


03 ha

0 0.27 0.00 0.27 March 2012-13

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes - 1 ha 0.078 0.052 00 0.13 June 2013-14

Check Wall - Yes - Yes - Forest UG 03 nos

2.43 1.62 0 4.05 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Nala Plug - Yes Yes Yes Yes - UG 08 nos

2.88 1.92 0 4.80 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Gully plug - Yes - Yes - - UG 15 nos

1.17 0.78 0.00 1.95 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 6.558 7.232 0.00 13.7

9

4 Chunda

di Contour


873 rmt

0 0.44 0.00 0.44 March 2012-13

Staggered trenches


0 0.93 0.00 0.93 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Field


4560 rmt

0 1.91 0.00 1.91 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


06 ha

0 0.54 0.00 0.54 March 2012-13

Earthan

Dam - - Yes Yes - Forest UG

07 nos

0 0.49 0 0.49 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes - - 5 ha 0.39 0.26 0 0.65

June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Check Wall Yes - Yes - Forest UG 07 3.78 5.67 0 9.45 March 2013-14



nos March 2014-15 March 2015-16

Nala Plug - Yes Yes Yes Yes Forest UG 09 nos

3.24 2.16 0 5.40 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.79 1.20 0.00 2.99 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 9.20 13.6 0.00 22.8

0

5

Gadh

Contour Trenches

Yes - - - - Forest UG 525 rmt

0 0.26 0.00 0.26 March 2012-13

Staggered trenches


0 0.43 0.00 March 2012-13

Field


1950 rmt

0 0.82 0.00 0.82 March 2012-13

Land


4.20 ha

0 0.38 0.00 0.38 March 2012-13

Earthan

Dam - - Yes Yes - Forest UG 6 nos 0 0.42 0 0.42

March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes - -

2.50 ha

0.20 0.13 0 0.33 June 2013-14

Check Wall - Yes - Yes Forest UG 06 nos

4.86 3.24 0 8.10 March 2014-15 March 2015-16


2.52 1.68 0 4.20 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.17 0.78 0.00 1.95 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 8.75 8.14 16.8

9 19.73

6 Parvadi Field


3985 rmt

0 1.67 0.00 1.67 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


05 ha

0 0.45 0.00 0.45 March 2012-13



Earthan


04 nos

0 0.28 0 0.28 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes -

05 ha

0.39 0.26 0 0.65 June 2013-14


3.24 2.16 5.40 March 2014-15 March 2015-16


3.60 2.40 6.00 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Gully plug - Yes Yes - - UG 25 nos

1.95 1.30 0.00 3.25 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 9.18 8.52 0.00 17.70

7 Vavdi bujarg (Part)

Contour Trenches



Staggered trenches



Field


3500 rmt

0 1.47 0.00 1.47 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


08 ha

0 0.72 0.00 0.72 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Earthan

Dam - - Yes Yes - Forest UG

10 nos

0 0.70 0 0.70 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio

n - - Yes Yes Yes Forest

25 ha

1.95 1.30 0 3.25 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Check Wall - Yes Yes - Forest UG 06 nos

7.20 4.80 0 12.0

0



5.04 3.36 0 8.40 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.95 1.30 0.00 3.25 March 2012-13 March 2013-14



Protection

Wall Yes - Yes - Forest UG

05 nos

5.40 3.60 0 9.00 March 2012-13 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Total 21.54 25.38 0.00 46.92

8 Thana Garjan

Contour Trenches


0 1.24 0.00 1.24 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Staggered trenches


0 2.98 0.00 2.98 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Field


2815 rmt

0 1.18 0.00 1.18 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


8.60 ha

0 0.77 0.00 0.77 March 2012-13

Earthan


16 nos

0 1.12 0 1.12 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Afforestatio


16.25 ha

1.26 0.85 0 2.11 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Check Wall Yes Yes - - UG 12 nos

9.72 6.48 0 16.2

0


Gully plug Yes Yes - - UG 32 nos

2.49 1.67 0.00 4.16 March 2012-13 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Protection

Wall Yes Yes - Forest UG

02 nos

2.16 1.44 0 3.60 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 15.63 17.73 0.00 33.36

9 Tajpur Contour


150 rmt

0 0.08 0.00 0.08 March 2012-13

Staggered trenches


0 0.59 0.00 0.59 March 2012-13

Field


4765 rmt

0 2.00 0.00 2.00 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land - - Yes Yes - - UG 03 0 0.27 0.00 0.27 March 2013-14



Leveling ha

Afforestatio


02 ha

0.15 0.11 0 0.26 June 2013-14

Check Wall - Yes Yes - Forest UG 05 nos

4.05 2.70 0 6.75 March 2014-15 March 2015-16


2.52 1.68 0 4.20 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.33 0.88 0.00 2.21 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 8.05 8.31 0.00 16.36

10 Jafrabad

)Part) Field


2588 rmt

0 1.08 0.00 1.08 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


05 ha

0 0.45 0.00 0.45 March 2013-14

Afforestatio


04 ha

0.31 0.52 0 0.52 June 2013-14


0.81 0.54 0 1.35 March 2014-15


2.88 1.92 0 4.80 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.09 0.73 0.00 1.82 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 5.09 5.24 0.00 10.02

11 Lilesara Contour


4050 rmt

0 2.02 0.00 2.02 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Staggered trenches


0 1.40 0.00 1.40 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Field


4500 rmt

0 1.89 0.00 1.89 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Land


07 ha

0 0.63 0.00 0.63 March 2012-13

Earthan - - Yes Yes - - UG 06 0 0.42 0 0.42 March 2013-14



Dam nos March 2014-15

Afforestatio


10 ha

0.78 0.52 0 1.30 June 2014-15

Check Wall - Yes - Yes - Forest UG 07 nos

5.67 3.78 0 9.45 March 2013-14 March 2014-15 March 2015-16


3.96 2.64 0 6.60 March 2013-14 March 2014-15


1.17 0.78 0.00 1.95 March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Protection

Wall - Yes Yes - Forest UG 1 nos 1.08 0.72 0.00 1.80

March 2012-13 March 2013-14

Total 12.66 14.80 0.00 27.46

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

4.3.3. Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures, cost estimates and technical details of the

activities proposed in the project IWMP-11:

The project consists of eleven villages and the watershed activities are planned for each village is different. The detail summary of watershed / soil and water conservation activities, cost estimates and technical details of the project IWMP-11 of Panchmahal is given below.



Table No.36.1 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Rinchhiya

Sr. no Activities unit Rate

Rinchhiya

Nos Net

Expense(Rs) IWMP Fund Convergence Strategy

Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 5095 213990 213990 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 12 108000 108000 00

3 Afforestation ha 13000 4 52000 52000 00

Ridge Treatment

4 Contour Trench rmt 50 2400 120000 120000 00

5 Staggered Trenches Nos 50 4360 218000 218000 00

Surface water recharging

6 Check dam nos 320000 2 640000 640000 00

7 Check Wall nos 135000 5 675000 675000 00

Drainage Treatment

8 Nala Plug nos 60000 10 600000 600000 00

9 Gully Plug nos 13000 19 247000 247000 00

Other Works Of Convergence

10 Protection Wall nos 300000 1 300000 0 300000 (MGNREGA)

11 Road nos 100000 1 100000 0 100000 (BRGF)

12 Hand pump nos 50000 1 50000 0 50000 (BRGF)

13 Bore Motor-3 nos 60000 3 180000 0 180000(BRGF)

Total 3503990 2873990 630000



Table No.36.2 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Sankali

Sr. no Activities unit Rate

Sankali

Nos Net

Expense(Rs) IWMP Fund Convergence Strategy

Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 2400 100800 100800 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 17.50 157500 157500 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 35000 1 35000 35000 00

4 Afforestation nos 13000 16 208000 208000 00

Ridge Treatment


6 Straggered Trench rmt 50 4560 228000 228000 00


7 Check Dam nos 300000/ 265450

5 1430900 1430900 00

8 Check Wall nos 152000 13 1976000 1976000 00

Drainage Treatment

9 Nala Plug nos 60000 6 360000 360000 00

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 19 247000 247000 00


11 Check Wall nos 100000 1 100000 0 200000 (MGNREGA)

12 Gap Plantation in Open Forest

Ha 8600

15 129000

0 129000 (Forest-JBIC)

13 Protection Wall nos 400000 1 400000 0 400000(MGNREGA)

14 Protection Wall nos 200000 1 200000 0 200000 (BRGF)

Total 5697200 4868200 929000



Table No.36.3 - Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Ladpur

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Ladpur

Nos Net Expense(Rs) IWMP Fund Convergence Strategy

Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 3197 134274 134274 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 3 27000 27000 00


Ridge Treatment


5 Staggered Trench rmt 50 1550 77500 77500 00


6 Check Dam nos 300000 1 300000 300000 00

7 Check Wall nos 135000 3 405000 405000 00

Drainage Treatment

8 Nala Plug nos 60000 8 480000 480000 00

9 Gully Plug nos 13000 15 195000 195000 00



11 Check Wall-2 nos 100000 2 200000 0 200000 (MGNREGA)

12 Desilting of Check Dam nos 51000 1 51000 0 51000 (MGNREGA)

13 Cause Way nos 225000 1 225000 0 225000 (MGNREGA)

Total 2555274 1679274 876000



Table No.36.4 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Chundadi

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Chundadi


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 4560 191520 191520 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 6 54000 54000 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 49000 1 49000 49000 00


Ridge Treatment




7 Check Dam nos 300000 1 300000 300000 00

8 Check Wall nos 135000 7 945000 945000 00

Drainage Treatment

9 Nala Plug nos 60000 9 540000 540000 00

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 23 299000 299000 00


11 Gap Plantation in Open Forest

Ha

8600 100

861000 0 861000 (Forest-JBIC)

Total 3441220 2580220 861000



Table No.36.5 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Gadh

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Gadh


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 1950 81900 81900 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 4.20 37800 37800 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 42000 1 42000 42000 00

4 Afforestation nos 13000 2.50 32500 32500 00

Ridge Treatment




7 Check Dam nos 300000 3 900000 900000 00

8 Check Wall nos 135000 6 810000 810000 00

Drainage Treatment

9 Nala Plug nos 60000 7 420000 420000 00

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 15 195000 195000 00





14 Checkdam nos 200000 1 200000 0 200000( BRGF)

Total 3162950 2587950 575000



Table No.36.6 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Parvadi

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Parvadi


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 3985 167370 167370 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 5 45000 45000 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 28000 1 28000 28000 00



5 Check Dam nos 300000 2 600000 600000 00

6 Check Wall nos 135000 4 540000 540000 00

Drainage Treatment

7 Nala Plug nos 60000 10 600000 600000 00

8 Gully Plug nos 13000 25 325000 325000 00



10 check Wall nos 100000 1 100000 0 100000 (MGNREGA)

11 Road nos 200000 1 200000 0 200000 (MGNREGA)



Total 3170370 2370370 800000



Table No.36.7 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Vavdi Bujarg (Part)

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Vavdi bujarg(Part)


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 3500 147000 147000 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 8 72000 72000 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 35000 2 70000 70000 00


Ridge Treatment


6 Staggered Trench Nos 50 10176 508800 508800 00


7 Check Dam nos 322000 5 1610000 1610000 00

8 Check Wall nos 200000 6 1200000 1200000 00

Drainage Treatment

9 Nala Plug nos 60000 14 840000 840000 00

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 25 325000 325000 00


11 Protection Wall

nos 180000

5 900000

0 900000 (MGNREGA)

Total 6302800 5402800 900000



Table No.36.8 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Thana Garjan

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Thana Garjan


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 2815 118230 118230 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 8.60 77400 77400 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 35000/42000 3 112000 112000 00

4 Afforestation nos 13000 16.25 211250 211250 00

Ridge Treatment


6 Staggered Trench Nos 50 5950 297500 297500 00


7 Check Dam nos 300000 5 1500000 1500000 00

9 Check Wall nos 135000 12 1620000 1620000 00

Drainage Treatment

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 32 416000 416000 00


12 Desilting of check Dam nos 51000 1 51000 0 51000 (MGNREGA)


14 Gap Plantation in Open Forest Ha 8600 30 258000 0 258000 (Forest-JBIC)


16 Protection Wall nos 200000 1 200000 0 200000 (BRGF)

Total 5485980 4476980 1009000



Table No.36.9 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Tajpur

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Tajpur


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 4765 200130 200130 00


3 Land Leveling Ha 9000 3 27000 27000 00

Ridge Treatment




6 Check Dam nos 300000 2 600000 600000 00

7 Check Wall nos 135000 5 675000 675000 00

Drainage Treatment

8 Nala Plug nos 60000 7 420000 420000 00

9 Gully Plug nos 13000 17 221000 221000 00


10 Protection Wall

nos 400000

1 400000

0 400000 (MGNREGA)

12 Check Wall

nos 100000

1 100000

0 100000 (MGNREGA)

13 Protection Wall

nos 300000

1 300000

0 300000 (MGNREGA)

Total 3033630 2233630 800000



Table No.36.10 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Jafrabad (Part)

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Jafrabad(Part)


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 2588 108696 108696 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 5 45000 45000 00



4 Check Dam nos 300000 1 300000 300000 00

5 Check Wall nos 135000 1 135000 135000 00

Drainage Treatment

6 Nala Plug nos 60000 8 480000 480000 00

7 Gully Plug nos 13000 14 182000 182000 00


8 Desilting of check Dam nos 51000 1 51000 0 51000 (MGNREGA)




Total 1628696 1302696 326000



Table No.36.11 Summary of Soil and water conservation Structures and activity of Lilesara

Sr. no Activities unit Rate Lilesara


Land development

1 Farm bund rmt 42 4500 189000 189000 00

2 Land Leveling ha 9000 7 63000 63000 00

3 Earthen Dam nos 42000 1 42000 42000 00


Ridge Treatment 0



Surface water recharging 0

7 Check Dam nos 300000 4 1200000 1200000 00

8 Check Wall nos 135000 7 945000 945000 00

Drainage Treatment 0

9 Nala Plug nos 60000 11 660000 660000 00

10 Gully Plug nos 13000 15 195000 195000 00



12 Gap Plantation in Open Forest Ha 8600 40 344000 0 344000(Forest-JBIC)

Total 4610500 3766500 844000



Table No. 36.12 (a) Location of the Check dams of the project IWMP-11, Panchmahal.

Sr. No

Project Name

Name of Village

Name of Structure proposed

Survey No GPS Co-ordinates

Remarks North East

1

IWMP-11

Rinchhiya Check dam-1 47 22°44’18.2” 73°41’26.2” Check dam-2 43 22°43’52.3” 73°41’55.3”

Sankali Check dam-1 178 22°46’03.0” 73°43’42.0”

Check dam-2 194 22°46’19.1” 73°43’56.7”

Check dam-3 174 22°46’06.0” 73°43’53.9”

2 Check dam-4 118 22°46’04.8” 73°42’38.9”

Check dam-5 184 22°46’08.7” 73°43’19.1” 3 Ladpur Check dam-1 27/1 22°47’24.2” 73°43’41.9” 4 Chundadi Check dam-1 43 22°47’15.3” 73°41’23.7”

5 Gadh Check dam-1 52 22°47’10.3” 73°42’21.3” Check dam-2 Koop-4 22°47’01.6” 73°41’52.2” Check dam-3 Koop-1 22°46’55.3” 73°42’07.2”

Paravdi Check dam-1 83 22°47’22.5” 73°39’41.1” 6 Check dam-2 152 22°47’30.5” 73°40’15.2”

Vavdibujarg

(Part) Check dam-1 155 - -

Check dam-2 156 - - Check dam-3 152 - -

7 Check dam-4 151 - - Check dam-5 154 - -

Thanagarjan Check dam-1 51 22°42’42.2” 73°37’41.5” Check dam-2 40p23 22°42’05.1” 73°38’56.6” Check dam-3 42 22°42’56.9” 73°38’48.5”

8 Check dam-4 40p14 22°43’45.9” 73°39’08.6” Check dam-5 41p2 22°42’45.0” 73°37’56.0”

9 Tajpur Check dam-1 107 22°43’23.2” 73°39’38.4” Check dam-2 66 22°43’47.3” 73°39’41.8”



10 Jafrabad

(Part) Check dam-1 32 22°47’10.4” 73°38’25.8”

Lilesara Check dam-1 116/1 22°44’03.1” 73°37’43.8”

Check dam-2 116/1 22°43’59.3” 73°37’42.7”

11 Check dam-3 116/1 22°43’59.12” 73°37’42.6”

Check dam-4 116/1 22°43’59.6” 73°37’42.5”

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Rinchhiya Check dam - - - - 2 10 8000 cmt 6.40 10 8000cmt 6.40

Total - - - - 2 10 8000 cmt 6.40 10 8000cmt 6.40

2

Sankali Check dam - - - - 5 25 19000 cmt 14.30 25 19000 cmt 14.30

Total - - - - 5 25 19000

cmt 14.30 25 19000 cmt 14.30

3 Ladpur Check dam - - - - 1 3 2500 cmt 3.00 3 2500 cmt 3.00

Total - - - - 1 3 2500 cmt 3.00 3 2500 cmt 3.00

4 Chundadi Check dam - - - - 1 3 3000 cmt 3.00 3 3000 cmt 3.00

Total - - - - 1 3 3000 cmt 3.00 3 3000 cmt 3.00

5 Gadh Check dam - - - - 3 10 12000 cmt 9.00 10 12000 cmt 9.00

Total - - - - 3 10 12000

cmt 9.00 10 12000 cmt 9.00



6 Parvadi Check dam - - - - 2 10 8000 cmt 6.00 10 8000cmt 6.00

Total - - - - 2 10 8000 cmt 6.00 10 8000cmt 6.00

7 Vavdibujarg

(Part)

Check dam - - - - 5 25 17000 cmt 16.10 25 17000 cmt 16.10

Total - - - - 5 25 17000

cmt 16.10 25 17000 cmt 16.10

8

Thana Garjan Check dam - - - - 5 25 18000 cmt 15.00 25 18000 cmt 15.00

Total - - - - 5 25 18000

cmt 15.00 25 18000 cmt 15.00

9 Tajpur Check dam - - - - 2 10 9000 cmt 6.00 10 9000cmt 6.00

Total - - - - 2 10 9000 cmt 6.00 10 9000cmt 6.00

10 Jafrabad

(Part) Check dam - - - - 1 3 2500 cmt 3.00 3 2500 cmt 3.00

Total - - - - 1 3 2500 cmt 3.00 3 2500 cmt 3.00

11 Lilesara Check dam - - - - 4 12 16000 cmt 12.00 12 16000 cmt 12.00

Total - - - - 4 12 16000

cmt 12.00 12 16000 cmt 12.00

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of

existing recharging structures Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No.

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

1

Rinchhiya Rain Roof Well Recharge - - - - - - - -

Total for the village - - - - - - - -

2 Sankali Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


3 Ladpur Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


4 Chundadi Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -




5

Gadh Rain Roof Well Recharge - - - - - - - -


6 Parvadi Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


7 Vavdibujarg

(Part) Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


8 Thana Garjan Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


9

Tajpur Rain Roof Well Recharge - - - - - - - -


10 Jafrabad

(Part) Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


11 Lilesara Open well Recharge - - - - - - - -


Table no. 39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Estimated cost (Rs. in

lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Rinchhiya

Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.77 Oct-2012-13

June-2014-15 Minor Lift Irrigation

Yes UG 3.00 March-2012-13 June-2014-15

Horticulture Afforestation

Yes UG 0.75 June-2012-13 June-2014-15

Vegetable Growing Yes UG 1.05 Oct-2012-13

June-2014-15



Oct-2015-16

Floriculture Yes UG 1.00 June 2013-14

Poultry Farming to individuals

Yes L.L. 0.38 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp,

Artificial Insemination etc

Yes SHG/UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Agro Center Yes SHG 1.20 Oct 2013-14

Cattle Feed Store Yes SHG/UG/L.L. 1.00 Oct 2013-14

Total 9.75

2 Sankali

Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.05 Oct 2013-14

Minor Lift Irrigation Yes UG 3.00

March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 1.50 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Vegetable Growing Yes UG 1.25

Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15 Oct 2015-16

Floriculture Yes UG 2.00 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Centering & Shuttering

Yes SHG 1.00 March 2013-14

Flour & pulse Processing unit


Agro Center Yes SHG 2.00 March 2013-14





Forestry Nursery Yes SHG 1.00 June 2013-14



Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Milk Collection & Cattle Feed Store

Yes SHG 2.00 June 2013-14

Total 16.51

3 Ladpur



March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 0.60 June 2013-14 June 2014-15

Vegetable Growing Yes UG 0.23 Oct 2013-14

June 2013-14


Vermi Compost Yes UG 0.70 June 2013-14





Yes SHG/UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Agro Center Yes UG 1.02 Nov 2013-14

Total 5.69

4 Chundadi


June 2013-14 Minor Lift Irrigation

Yes UG 1.50 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Vegetable Growing Yes UG 0.73 Oct 2013-14



June 2014-15


Vermi Compost Yes UG 0.50 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Up Gradation Centering Matrial


Agro Center Yes SHG 2.60 Oct 2013-14



Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Total 8.75

5 Gadh



March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Vegetable Growing Yes UG

0.53

Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15


Vermi Compost to Individual

Yes UG 1.000

March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Fluor & Rise Processing Unit

Yes SHG 1.50

March 2013-14


Yes LL 0.30

March 2013-14

Forestry Nursery Yes UG 1.00 June 2013-14

Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc

Yes UG

0.600

Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15



Cattle Feed Store Yes SHG 1.90 Oct 2013-14

Total 8.78

6 Parvadi

Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.10 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15


March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 0.45 June 2013-14


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15







Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Cattle Feed Store Yes SHG 1.50 Oct 2013-14

Total 8.08

7 Vavdi bujarg

(Part)



March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15





Flour & Rice Processing unit







Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Fishery Yes SHG 2.50 June 2013-14

Up Gradation of centering Materials


Cabin For Asset less Yes L.L. 1.25 March 2013-14 March 2014-15

Total 18.33

8 Thanagarjan

Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.41 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15 Oct 2015-16


March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 1.65 June 2013-14 June 2014-15


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15 Oct 2015-16

June 2015-16








Yes L.L. 0.20 March 2013-14




Yes SHG/UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Cattle Feed Store Yes SHG/UG 2.00 Nov 2013-14



Agro Center Yes SHG 1.78 Nov 2013-14

Total 15.19

9 Tajpur



March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 0.75 June 2013-14 June 2014-15


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15

Floriculture Yes UG 1.00 June 2013-14 June 2014-15











Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Total 7.58

10 Jafrabad (Part)

Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.15 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2015-16 Minor Lift Irrigation Yes UG 0.75 March 2013-14


Yes UG 0.45 June 2013-14


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15


Vermi Compost Yes SHG 1.00 March 2013-14





Yes SHG/UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Total 4.43

11 Lilesara Demonstration Plot Yes UG 0.46 Oct 2013-14

June 2014-15 June 2015-16




March 2013-14 March 2014-15


Yes UG 0.60 June 2013-14


Oct 2013-14 June 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

June 2014-15







Forestry Nursery Yes Forest SHG 1.00 March 2013-14



Yes UG 0.60 Oct 2013-14 Oct 2014-15

Agro Center Yes SHG 1.35 March 2013-14

Cattle Feed Store Yes SHG 1.50 March 2013-14

Cabin For Asset less Yes L.L. 0.30 March 2013-14

Refreshment Canteen


Total 12.77



4.3.4. Village wise summary of the Livelihood, production and micro-enterprise proposed in IWMP-11

Summary of Livelihood, Production, Micro Enter Prize and others agriculture allied activities proposed in the Project IWMP-11:

The watershed development team identified the need of the people of the respective project area through using participatory methods like FGD, PRA

etc. and the planned was prepared with watershed committee which is detailed below. The need identification of the people helps the project to

implement the activities smoothly.

Table no. 39.1: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Rinchhiya)

Sr Activity/Types of work Activities to be Carried out

Unit Cost ( Rs.In Lakh)

Richhiya

9.750

Unit Total Cost ( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Maize & Tur -1 Mix Crops 0.050 1 0.050

2 Ginger, Garlic etc 0.150 2 0.300

3 Vegetable Demonstration Climbers type vegetable 0.210 2 0.420

5 Promotion Of Agricultural Activities

Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 4 3.000

6 Horticulture Afforestation 0.150 5 0.750

7 Vegetable Growing 0.025 42 1.050

8 Floriculture 0.200 5 1.000

9 Farashkhana 1.200 1 1.200

10 Activity for Asset less & Marginal Farmers

Poultry Farming to individuals 0.020 19 0.380

11 Dairy Development & Milk Production

Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600

12 Cattle Feed Store 1.000 1 1.000

Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 0 0

13 Agriculture Input Kits 0.028 15 0.420

14 Oil Engine 0.120 1 0.120



15 Seed Storage Pip 0.008 1 0.008

16 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 1 0.040

17 Horticulture Inputs Kits 0.010 15 0.150

18 Animal Husbandry Inputs Kits 0.010 15 0.150

Total Cost ( Rs.In Lakh) 132 10.638

Table no. 39.2 Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Sankali) Sr Activity/Types of work Activities to be Carried out


Sankali

16.511

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Maize & Tur -1 Mix Crops 0.050 1 0.050 2 Promotion Of

Agricultural Activities Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 4 3.000

3 Horticulture Afforestation 0.150 10 1.500 4 Vegetable Growing 0.025 34 0.850 5 Climber Type Vegetable 0.200 2 0.400 6 Floriculture 0.200 10 2.000 7 Forestry Nursery (SHG) 1.000 1 1.000 8 Agro Center 2.000 1 2.000 9 Agro-processing Unit Flour & Rise Processing unit 1.500 1 1.500

10 Activity for Asset less & Marginal Farmers

Poultry Farming to individuals 0.020

30 0.600 11 Dairy Development Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600 12 Milk Collection & Cattle Feed Store (SHG) 2.000 1 2.000 13 Minor Activity Centering 1.000 1 1.000 Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 0 0 14 Agriculture Inputs Kits 0.028 51 1.428 15 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 15 0.600



16 Horticulture Inputs Kits 0.010 15 0.150 17 Animal Husbandry Inputs Kits 0.010 15 0.150 18 Mission Manglam Taluka

Panchyat Cash Credit

0.500 6 3.000

19 J.B.I.C. (Forest Dept) Vegetable Vadi 0.300 2 0.600 Total Cost ( Rs.In Lakh) 202 22.428

Table no. 39.3: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Ladpur)

Sr Activity/Types of work Activities to be Carried out


Ladpur

5.697

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Maize & Tur -1 Mix Crops 0.050 1 0.050 2 Promotion Of

Agricultural Activities Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 2 1.500

3 Horticulture Afforestation 0.150 4 0.600 4 Vegetable Growing 0.025 9 0.225 5 Floriculture 0.200 3 0.600 6 Fishery (SHG) 1.00 1 1.00 7 Organic Farming Vermi Compost to Individual 0.100 7 0.700 8 Activity for Asset less &

Marginal Farmers Poultry Farming to individuals

0.020 20 0.400

9 Dairy Development Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.100

2 0.600 Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

0 0 0

10 Agriculture Inputs Kits 0.028 24

0.672 11 Sprinkler / Drip

0.040 5 0.200

12 Horticulture Inputs Kits 0.010 15

0.150



13 Animal Husbandry Inputs Kits 0.010 15

0.150 Total Cost ( Rs.In Lakh) 108 6.867

Table no. 39.4: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Chundadi)

Sr Activity/Types of work Activities to be Carried out Unit Cost( Rs.In

Lakh)

Chundadi

8.754

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Maize,Tur 0.050 2 0.100

2

Promotion Of Agricultural Activities



4 Climbers Type Vegetable 0.20 2 0.40


6 Agro Centre 2.600 1 2.600

7 Organic Farming Vermi Compost to Individual 0.100 5 0.500

8 Dairy Development Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600

9 Minor Activity Up Gradation of Centering Material 2.320 1 2.320

Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

0 0 0

10 Agriculture Inputs Kits

0.028 15 0.420

11 Horticulture Inputs Kits

0.010 15 0.150



12 Animal Husbandry Inputs Kits

0.010 15 0.150

13 Industries & Mines Manav Kalyan

0.040 1 0.040

14 J.B.I.C. (Forest Dept) Vermi Compost to SHG

0.300 2 0.600


Table no. 39.5: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Gadh)

Sr Activity/Types of work Activities to be Carried out Unit Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

Gadh

8.781

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)


2


Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 2 1.500 3 Vegetable Growing 0.025 21 0.525 4 Floriculture 0.200 2 0.400 6 Forestry Nursery 1.000 1 1.000

7 Organic Farming

Vermi Compost to Individual 0.100 10 1.000 8 Flour & Rice Processing Unit 1.500 1 1.500

9 Activity for Asset less &

Marginal Farmers Poultry Farming to individuals 0.020

15 0.300 10

Dairy Development Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600

11 Farashkhana 1.900 1 1.900


0 0 0

12 Agriculture Inputs Kits 0.028 24 0.672

13 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 5 0.200



16 Mission Manglam Cash Credit 0.500 4 2.000

17 J.B.I.C. (Forest Dept) Vermi Compost to SHG 0.300 1 0.300



18 Poultry Farm to SHG 0.300 1 0.300


Table no. 39.6: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Parvadi)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Parvadi

8.042

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh) 1 Crop Demonstration Maize & Tur -1 Mix Crops 0.050 1 0.050

2 Vegetable Demonstration

Tomato 0.050 1 0.050

3 Climbers Type Vegetable 0.210 1 0.210

4


Minor Lift Irrigation (Bhil Faliya) 0.750 1 0.750

5 Minor Lift Irrigation (Charel Faliya) 1.50 1 1.500


7 Vegetable growing 0.025 30 0.750 8 Floriculture 0.200 3 0.600 9 Organic Farming Vegetable growing 0.15 4 0.60



30 0.600

11 Dairy Development


12 Cantering set SHG 1.500 1 1.500 Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 0 0 0


14 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 10 0.400






Table no. 39.7: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Thanagarjan)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Thanagarjan

15.191

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1

Crop Demonstration

Paddy, Wheat, 0.050 2 0.100 2 Cotton, Castor, 0.080 2 0.160

3 Ginger 0.150 1 0.150

5


Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 2 1.500 6 Horticulture Afforestation 0.150 11 1.650 7 Vegetable Growing 0.025 30 0.750 8 Floriculture 0.200 5 1.000

9 Tailoring (SHG) 1.000 1 1.000 10 Mixture machine (SHG) 1.780 1 1.780 11 Organic Farming Vegetable growing 0.100 7 1.050 12 Agro-processing Unit Flour & Rice Processing unit 1.500 1 1.500



10 0.200


Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600 15 Farashkhana 2.00 1 2.000 16 Minor Activities Up Gradation of centering Materials 1.80 1 1.800

Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 0 0 0


18 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 8 0.320






Table no. 39.8: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Vavdi Bujarg -Part)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Vavdi Bujarg

18.331

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh) 1 Vegetable

Demonstration

Ginger 0.150 1 0.150 2 Tomato 0.050 1 0.050

3


Minor Lift Irrigation 0.750 3 2.250 4 Vegetable Climbers 0.200 5 1.000 5 Vegetable Growing 0.025 26 0.650 6 Floriculture 0.200 5 1.000

7 Forestry Nursery 1.450 1 1.450 8 Organic Farming Vermi Compost to Individual 0.100 10 1.000 9 Agro-processing Unit Flour & Rice Processing unit 2.500 1 2.500


Marginal Farmers


11 Fishery 2.500 1 2.500 12 Cabin For Asset less 0.250 5 1.250 13 Dairy Development Cattle Camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc 0.300 2 0.600 14 Minor Activities Up Gradation of centering Materials 2.750 1 2.750






Total Cost ( Rs.In Lakh) 18.33



Table no. 39.9: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Tajpur)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Tajpur

7.578

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Cotton, Castor, 0.080 2 0.160

2






6 Agro-processing Unit Flour & Rice Processing unit 1.500 1 1.500


Marginal Farmers Poultry Farming to individuals 0.020 25 0.500


9 Minor Activities Up Gradation of centering Materials 1.120 1 1.120









Table no. 39.10: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Jafrabad-Part)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Jafrabad

4.42

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)


2 Vegetable

Demonstration Chilly, Brinjal. 0.050 2 0.100

3






7 Organic Farming Vermi Compost to SHG 1.00 1 1.000


Marginal Farmers Poultry Farming to individuals 0.020 24 0.480



0 0 0

10 Agriculture Inputs Kits

0.028 45 1.260

11 Horticulture Inputs Kits

0.010 15 0.150

12 Animal Husbandry Inputs Kits

0.010 15 0.150




Table no. 39.11: Activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises (Village: Lilesara)


( Rs.In Lakh)

Lilesara

12.779

Unit Total Cost

( Rs.In Lakh)

1 Crop Demonstration Cotton, Castor, 0.080 2 0.160

3






7 Forestry Nursery 1.300 1 1.300

8 Agro Center 1.350 1 1.350

9 Organic Farming Vermi Compost to Individual 0.100 10 1.000

10 Agro-processing Unit Flour & Rice Processing unit 1.500 1 1.500


Marginal Farmers


12 Refreshment Canteen 1.50 1 1.500

13 Cabin for Asset less 0.150 2 0.300



15 Cattle Feed Store 1.500 1 1.500



17 Sprinkler / Drip 0.040 7 0.280






Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG

1 Rinchhiya Cattle Feed Store 1 87245.00

2 Sankali

Agro Centre 1 50000.00

Flour & Rice Processing unit 1 35000.00

Milk Collection & Cattle feed Store 1 52000.00

Nursery Rising for Forestry 1 15000.00

Up Gradation Centering Materials 1 100000.00

3 Ladpur Agro Centre 1 50000.00

4 Chundadi Up Gradation Centering Materials 1 100000.00


5 Gadh Nursery Rising for Forestry 1 15000.00


Cattle feed Store 1 87000.00

6 Parvadi Agro Centre 1 87245.00

7 Vavdibujarg (Part)


Fishery Dev. & Fish Cultivation 1 69000.00


Up Gradation of Centering Material

1 100000.00



8 Thanagarjan

Flour & Rice Processing 1 35000.00


Cattle Feed Store 1 87000.00


1 50000.00


9 Tajpur Flour & Rice Processing 1 35000.00


1 100000.00

10 Jafrabad(Part) Vermi Composting 1 20000.00

11 Lilesara

Flour & Rice Processing 1 35000.00



1 100000.00

Refreshment Canteen 1 99000.00

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

(Av. Annual Income in Rs) 1 Rinchhiya Cattle Feed Store Backward Linkage Rinchhiya Village Level 87245.00 2 Sankali Agro Centre Backward Linkage Village Level 50000.00


Backward Linkage Village Level

35000.00

Milk Collection & Cattle feed Store


52000.00

Nursery Rising for Forestry

Backward Linkage Village Level, UG, SHG 15000.00



Up Gradation Centering Materials

Backward Linkage Village Level, UG, SHG 100000.00

3 Ladpur Agro Centre Backward Linkage 50000.00

4 Chundadi Up Gradation Centering Materials

Backward Linkage Village Level & Other Nearest

Village 100000.00

Agro Centre Backward Linkage Village Level 50000.00

5 Gadh Nursery Rising for Forestry

Backward Linkage Village Level 15000.00



35000.00

Cattle feed Store Backward Linkage Local Villagers 87000.00

6 Parvadi Agro Centre Forward & Backward

Linkage

Jay Chmunda Mataji Fish Center, at Soni Pur Ta:

Balashinor 87245.00

7 Vavdibujarg (Part) Flour & Rice Processing unit


35000.00

Fishery Dev. & Fish Cultivation

Backward Linkage Local Villagers

69000.00


Backward Linkage Local Villagers 15000.00



100000.00

8 Thanagarjan Flour & Rice Processing

Forward & Backward Linkage

Village Level 35000.00


Backward Linkage 15000.00

Cattle Feed Store Forward & Backward

Linkage Village Level

87000.00



50000.00

Agro Centre Backward Linkage Local Villagers 50000.00

9 Tajpur Flour & Rice Processing


35000.00





100000.00

10 Jafrabad(Part) Vermi Composting Backward Linkage Local Villagers 20000.00

11 Lilesara Flour & Rice Processing


35000.00



15000.00



100000.00

Refreshment Canteen Backward Linkage Local Villagers 99000.00

Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

Sr. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge

area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

(D) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

1 Rinchhiya

Afforestation Yes Yes Yes YES Forest UG,SHG 15.00 15000 1.95 Aug-14


Yes Yes UG,Others 1.00 180 0.75 Aug-14

Total 16.00 15180 2.70

2 Sankali




Nursery raising

Yes Yes Forest SHG 50.00 50000 1.00 Aug-13



Total 58.00 50144 1.60

3 Ladpur




Total 4.80 48430 1.12

4 Chundadi

Afforestation Yes Yes Yes YES Forest UG,SHG 10.00 10000 1.3

Nursery raising


Total 86.00 85180 3.55

5 Gadh




Nursery raising


Total 82.00 81180 3.03

6 Parvadi




Nursery raising

Yes Yes Forest SHG 60000 0.60 Aug-13

Total 6.00 65180 2.00

7 Vavdi bujarg (Part)




Nursery raising


Total 101.00 100180 5.50

8 Thanagarj

an


Horticulture Yes Yes UG,Others 2.00 360 1.50 Aug-14



Afforestation

Nursery raising


Total 122.00 120360 6.10

9 Tajpur




Total 5.00 40180 1.27

10 Jafrabad

(Part)




Total 4.60 4108 0.97

11 Lilesara




Nursery raising


Total 37.20 35396 8.15

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No.

Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars

Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Rinchhiya Forest Staggered and Contour Trench 28.00 338000.00 0

2 Sankali Forest Staggered and Contour Trench 29.41 353000.00 0

3 Ladpur West Land &

Forest Staggered and Contour Trench 10.41 125000.00 0

4 Chundadi West Land & Staggered and Contour Trench, 119.24 1430700.00 146



Forest Check Dam, Check Wall, Earthen bund

5 Gadh West Land &

Forest

Staggered and Contour Trench, Check Dam, Check Wall, Nala plug

141.72 1700750.00 152

6 Parvadi West Land Earthen bund 2.33 233000.00 25

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) West Land &

Forest

Staggered and Contour Trench, Check Dam, Check Wall

350.73 4208800.00 125

8 Thanagarjan Forest Staggered and Contour Trench, 35.17 422100.00 135 9 Tajpur Forest Staggered and Contour Trench 5.37 64500.00 52

10 Jafrabad (Part) West Land - 0 0.00 0

11 Lilesara West Land &

Forest

Staggered and Contour Trench, Check Dam, Check Wall, Gully plug

94.79 1137500.00 142

Total for project 817.17 10013350 777

4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and also gain the insights, knowledge and

experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond

the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account

improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that

involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at Project Village

Alternative Land Use Plan

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Afforestation

Meteorological Information



Dairy Development and Management

Income Generation Activities

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website &

e-mail

Type of Institute

Area(s) of specialization$

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees to be trained

1 KVK,Vejalpur At-Vejalpur,Ta-Kalol,Di-

Panchmahals Govt.

Horticulture and Livelihood

2 Anand

Agriculture University, Anand

Khetiwadi Campus At-Ananad Di-Anand

Govt. Agriculture and

Animal Husbandry

3 Sad guru

foundation At-Chosala

Ta&Di-Dahod NGO

Capacity Building of Watershed Stake

holders

4 BAIF- Dhurva Lachhakdi, Dharmpur,

Vasda, NGO

Livelihood Promotion

# Central govt. Dept. / State govt. Dept. / Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

PIA 5 5 6

30.483

WDTs 7 6 10

UGs 120 Group (may increase)

1000(May Increase) 10

SHGs 25 Group (may increase)

2000 (May Increase) 10



WCs 126 126 15

GPs 18 (2 per person per GP)

18 10

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No.

Particulars Total

no. Rate per

unit Executing

agency Estimated

expenditure(Rs.)

Outcomes

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Street play (Bhavai) 22 3500 PIA and DWDU,

Godhra 77000

Awareness for the importance of watershed project

2 Campaigning for community mobilisation (twice per year per project for three year)

11 2000 PIA and DWDU,

Godhra 22000

3 Pamphlets and posters ( 1500 per one

campaign and two time per year) 33000 5

PIA and DWDU, Godhra

165000

4 Banners, Hoardings 22 750 PIA and DWDU,

Godhra 16500

5 Wall Painting at 3 community places 33 5000 PIA and DWDU,

Godhra 165000

6 Exposure Visit 22 25000 PIA and DWDU,

Godhra 550000



CHAPTER - 5

BUDGET



BUDGET Details of the Budget of the Project IWMP-11

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project (Rs in Lakh)

Sr. no

Village

Net Project

Cost

Administration Cost

Monitoring

Evaluation

Preparatory phase Watershed Works Phase Consolidation Phase

EPA Institution and CB

DPR Watershed developmen

t Work

Liveli hood for asset less

Production system and

Micro enterprises

100% 10% 1% 1% 4% 5% 1% 56% 9% 10% 3%

1 Rinchhiya 51.316 5.132 0.513 0.513 2.053 2.566 0.513 28.737 4.618 5.132 1.539

2 Sankali 86.904 8.690 0.869 0.869 3.476 4.345 0.869 48.666 7.821 8.690 2.607

3 Ladpur 29.987 2.999 0.300 0.300 1.199 1.499 0.300 16.793 2.699 2.999 0.900

4 Chundadi 46.075 4.608 0.461 0.461 1.843 2.304 0.461 25.802 4.147 4.608 1.382

5 Gadh 46.217 4.622 0.462 0.462 1.849 2.311 0.462 25.881 4.160 4.622 1.387

6 Parvadi 42.329 4.233 0.423 0.423 1.693 2.116 0.423 23.704 3.810 4.233 1.270

7 Vavdi Bujarg

(Part) 96.479 9.648 0.965 0.965 3.859 4.824 0.965 54.028 8.683 9.648 2.894

8 Thanagarjan 79.950 7.995 0.800 0.800 3.198 3.998 0.800 44.772 7.196 7.995 2.399

9 Tajpur 39.887 3.989 0.399 0.399 1.595 1.994 0.399 22.337 3.590 3.989 1.197

10 Jafrabad

(Part) 23.262 2.326 0.233 0.233 0.930 1.163 0.233 13.027 2.094 2.326 0.698

11 Lilesara 67.258 6.726 0.673 0.673 2.690 3.363 0.673 37.664 6.053 6.726 2.018

Total 609.664 60.966 6.097 6.097 24.385 30.483 6.098 341.411 54.871 60.968 18.291



Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (In Rs)

Sr. no

Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and

Micro enterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Rinchhiya 2.053 2.566 0.513 28.737 4.618 5.132 1.539 45.158

2 Sankali 3.476 4.345 0.869 48.666 7.821 8.690 2.607 76.474

3 Ladpur 1.199 1.499 0.300 16.793 2.699 2.999 0.900 26.389

4 Chundadi 1.843 2.304 0.461 25.802 4.147 4.608 1.382 40.547

5 Gadh 1.849 2.311 0.462 25.881 4.160 4.622 1.387 40.672

6 Parvadi 1.693 2.116 0.423 23.704 3.810 4.233 1.270 37.249

7 Vavdi

Bujarg(Part) 3.859 4.824 0.965 54.028 8.683 9.648 2.894 84.901

8 Thanagarjan 3.198 3.998 0.800 44.772 7.196 7.995 2.399 70.358

9 Tajpur 1.595 1.994 0.399 22.337 3.590 3.989 1.197 35.101

10 Jafrabad (Part) 0.930 1.163 0.233 13.027 2.094 2.326 0.698 20.471

11 Lilesara 2.690 3.363 0.673 37.664 6.053 6.726 2.018 59.187

Total 24.385 30.483 6.098 341.411 54.871 60.968 18.291 536.507



Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement (Rs in Lakhs)

Sr. No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under

IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Rinchhiya 45.677 38.487 7.19

2 Sankali 79.157 65.177 13.98

3 Ladpur 32.181 22.491 9.69

4 Chundadi 44.287 34.557 9.73

5 Gadh 43.943 34.663 9.28

6 Parvadi 40.627 31.747 8.88

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 90.999 72.359 18.64

8 Thanagarjan 70.853 59..963 10.89

9 Tajpur 41.396 29.916 11.48

10 Jafrabad (Part) 22.267 17.447 4.82

11 Lilesara 60.723 50.443 10.28

Total 572.11 457.25 114.86



Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr. No. Village Phase/ Type of

work* Activity to be carried

out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence

(Rs)

Scheme with which

convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Rinchhiya Work Phase

Protection Wall 300000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA

Road 100000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA

Hand pump 50000 BRGF

GP/TP/DRDA

Bore Motor-3 180000 BRGF

GP/TP/DRDA

Inputs Kits 72000 AGR

AGR/HR/AH

Oil Engine 12000 AGR

AGR/HR/AH

Seed Storage Pip 800 AGR

AGR/HR/AH

Sprinkler / Drip 4000 GGRC

AGR

Total 718800

2 Sankali Work Phase

Check Wall 100000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA

Gap Plantation in Open Forest

129000 Forest(JBIC)

Forest(JBIC)


GP/TP/DRDA

Protection Wall 200000 BRGF

GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH

Cash Credit 300000 Mishon Manglam

TP

Vegetable Vadi 60000 J.B.I.C

Forest


AGR

Total 1397800

3 Ladpur Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA

Check Wall-2 200000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA

Desilting of Check Dam 51000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA

Cause Way-2 225000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


AGR



Total 969200

4 Chundadi Work Phase


861000 Forest(JBIC)

Forest(JBIC)


AGR/HR/AH

Manva Kalyan 4000 Manav Kalyan

Ind. & Mines

Vermi Compost 60000 J.B.I.C

Forest

Total 973000

5 Gadh Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA

Cause Way 75000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA

Check Dam 200000 BRGF

GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


TP

Vermi Compost 30000 J.B.I.C

Forest

Poultry Farm 30000 J.B.I.C

Forest


AGR

Total 928200

6 Parvadi Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA

Road 200000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


AGR

Total 888000

7 Vavdibujarg (Part) Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


TP

Total 1864400

8 Thanagarjan Work Phase Desilting of check Dam 51000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA




258000 Forest(JBIC)

Forest(JBIC)


GP/TP/DRDA

Protection Wall 200000 BRGF

GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


AGR

Total 1089000

9 Tajpur Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH


TP

Total 1148000

10 Jafrabad (Part) Work Phase

Desilting of check Dam 51000 MGNREGA

GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


GP/TP/DRDA


AGR/HR/AH

Total 482000

11 Lilesara Work Phase


GP/TP/DRDA


344000 Forest(JBIC)

Forest(JBIC)


AGR/HR/AH


AGR

Total 1028000

Grand Total 11486400

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No. Name of Private Sector Partner

Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



CHAPTER - 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES



EXPECTED OUTCOMES

EXPECTED OUTCOMES 6.1 Expected Outcomes

This project is a need based project which aims to increase the individual income, to generate self employment and to increase the agricultural productivity in the eleven project villages of Godhara block under the IWMP-11. This project will be focused on multi approach activities which create an employment opportunity in their native villages for sustaining their income and check the migration, which became a key to defeat the present problems. Project will not only focus on create employment opportunity but also it focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by using latest appropriate technology and strengthening the local leaders through capacity building and training, which ultimately ensure the sustainable livelihood of the people of the IWMP-11 Project Village. The detail expected outcome are detailed below.

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits

Sr. No.

Village

Soil loss (cmt) Water storage

(Cmt) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover

Pre-project

Expected post-

project

Pre-project

Expected post-

project

Open well: pre-

project

Open well: post-

project

Bore well: pre-

project

Bore well: post-

project

Area in Ha.: pre- project

Area in Ha.: post-

project

Tree count:

pre-project

Tree count: post-project

1 Rinchhiya

2 to 3 1 to 2

1000 8000 7.00 5.50 - - 321.00 325.00 NA NA

2 Sankali 5500 19000 12.00 10.50 - - 215.38 231.38 NA NA

3 Ladpur 1500 5500 12.00 10.50 - - 116.00 117.00 NA NA

4 Chundadi 1000 6500 11.00 9.80 - - 283.96 288.96 NA NA

5 Gadh 8000 18000 11.00 9.80 - - 173.08 175.58 NA NA

6 Parvadi 6000 14000 10.00 8.80 - - 0.00 5.00 NA NA

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 10000 21000 10.00 8.80 - - 170.28 195.28 NA NA

8 Thanagarjan 10000 22000 12.00 10.50 - - 637.22 653.47 NA NA

9 Tajpur 4500 13000 12.00 10.50 - - 8.00 10.00 NA NA

10 Jafrabad (Part) 1000 5000 10.00 8.80 - - 0.00 4.00 NA NA

11 Lilesara 500 2000 12.00 10.80 - - 141.67 151.67 NA NA

Total 49000 134000 10.82 9.48 - - 2066.59 2157.34

6.1.1: Drinking water

The villages in the project area totally depend upon hand pump and open well for drinking and other domestic activities but the availability of water is only 10 months at maximum. The activities of watershed and the linkage with the WASMO will increase the ground water table so that the expected status of drinking water will increase. Comparative status of drinking water between pre-project and expected post project are furnished as under.



Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water

Sr. No. Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year)

Quality of drinking water

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Rinchhiya 10 12 Potable Potable

2 Sankali 10 12 Potable Potable

3 Ladpur 10 12 Potable Potable

4 Chundadi 10 12 Potable Potable

5 Gadh 10 12 Potable Potable

6 Parvadi 10 12 Potable Potable

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 10 12 Potable Potable

8 Thanagarjan 10 12 Potable Potable

9 Tajpur 10 12 Potable Potable

10 Jafrabad (Part) 10 12 Potable Potable

11 Lilesara 10 12 Potable Potable

6.1.2: Expected Crops Yield.

Due to additional availability of water farmers of the project area will be able to crops in their available land during winter seasons. Even after taking rainy season and post-rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also. The productivity will also increase due to the use of updated techniques.

This project is a need based project which aims to increase the individual income, to generate self employment and to increase the agricultural productivity in the Eleven project villages of Godhra block under the IWMP. This project will be focused on multi approach activities which create an employment opportunity in their native villages for sustaining their income and check the migration, which became a key to defeat the present problems. Project will not only focus on create employment opportunity but also it focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by using latest appropriate technology and strengthening the local leaders through capacity building and training, which ultimately ensure the sustainable livelihood of the people of the Godhra Village. The detail expected outcome are detailed below.

Table no. 54: Crop area and yield in the project area

Sr. No. Name of village Season Name of Crop Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl)

per ha. Area (ha)

Average Yield (qtl) per ha

1 Rinchhiya Kharif Maize 59.71 13.00 71.65 14.50



Rice 17.06 9.15 21.33 11.00

Rabi

Maize 10.66 13.00 13.86 15.50

Wheat 10.66 15.00 12.79 17.00

Zaid

Village total 98.09 50.15 119.63 58.00

2 Sankali

Kharif

Maize 284.94 12.50 341.93 14.00

Rice 81.41 9.00 101.76 11.00

Rabi

Maize 50.88 12.50 66.14 14.00

Wheat 50.88 15.00 61.06 17.00

Zaid

Village total 468.11 49.00 570.89 56.00

3 Ladpur

Kharif

Maize 70.00 12.50 84.00 14.00

Rice 20.00 9.15 25.00 11.00

Rabi

Maize 12.50 12.50 16.25 14.50

Wheat 12.50 15.00 15.00 17.00

Zaid

Village total 115.00 49.15 140.25 56.50

4 Chundadi

Kharif

Maize 41.90 12.25 50.28 13.50

Rice 11.74 9.50 14.68 11.00

Rabi

Maize 7.34 12.25 9.54 14.00

Wheat 7.34 14.50 8.81 16.00

Zaid

Village total 68.32 48.50 83.31 54.50

5 Gadh

Kharif

Maize 61.60 12.50 73.92 14.00

Rice 17.60 8.50 22.00 10.00

Rabi

Maize 11.00 12.50 14.30 14.00

Wheat 11.00 15.25 13.20 17.00

Zaid

Village total 101.2 48.75 123.42 55.00

6 Parvadi Kharif Maize 174.72 12.75 209.66 14.00



Rice 49.92 8.85 62.40 10.50

Rabi

Maize 31.20 12.75 40.56 14.50

Wheat 31.20 15.00 37.44 17.00

Zaid

Village total 287.04 49.35 350.06 56.00

7 Vavdibujarg(Part)

Kharif

Maize 318.76 12.00 382.51 14.00

Rice 91.07 9.00 113.84 11.00

Rabi

Maize 56.92 12.00 74.00 14.00

Wheat 56.92 15.00 68.30 17.00

Zaid - - - - -

Village total 523.67 48.00 638.65 56.00

8 Thanagrajan

Kharif

Maize 15.68 11.50 18.82 13.50

Rice 4.48 8.50 5.60 10.50

Rabi

Maize 2.80 11.50 3.64 14.00

Wheat 2.80 14.50 3.36 16.50

Zaid

Village total 25.76 46.00 31.42 54.50

9 Tajpur

Kharif

Maize 181.66 13.00 217.99 15.00

Rice 51.90 9.00 64.88 11.00

Rabi

Maize 32.44 13.00 42.17 15.50

Wheat 32.44 15.00 38.93 17.00

Zaid

Village total 298.44 50.00 363.97 58.50

10 Jafrabad (Part)

Kharif

Maize 297.81 12.75 357.37 14.50

Rice 85.09 9.50 106.36 11.50

Rabi

Maize 53.18 12.75 69.13 15.00

Wheat 53.18 14.75 63.82 16.50

Zaid

Village total 489.26 49.75 596.68 57.50

11 Lilesara Kharif Maize 199.48 13.00 239.38 15.00



Rice 56.99 11.00 71.24 12.50

Rabi

Maize 35.62 13.00 46.31 15.00

Wheat 35.62 14.50 42.74 17.00

Zaid

Village total 327.71 51.50 399.66 59.50

6.1.3 Horticulture The below table shows the area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP-11. The detail village wise description is given as under.

Table no. 55: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP

1 Rinchhiya 2.00 1.00

2 Sankali 5.00 2.40

3 Ladpur 2.50 0.80

4 Chundadi 1.50 0.00

5 Gadh 1.50 0.00

6 Parvadi 2.00 0.60

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 4.00 0.00

8 Thanagarjan 1.50 2.20

9 Tajpur 2.00 1.00

10 Jafrabad (Part) 2.50 0.60

11 Lilesara 3.00 0.80

IWMP-11 27.50 9.40

6.1.4 Livestock Table 58 gives the details of livestock in the project villages of the project IWMP-11. The livestock details are given as per the baseline survey. Milch-animals include

cow and buffalo in the project area. Productivity of the cow is 3 liters per day where as the buffalo give 4 litter of milk per day. Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litters, for solids please mention in KG. and income in Rs./day

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield (Lit)

Income (Rs)

No. Yield (Lit) Income (Rs)

1 Rinchhiya Milch-animals



Cow 110 2.5 25.00 132 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 125 2.0 35.00 150 5.00 40.00

2 Sankali

Milch-animals

Cow 528 2.5 25.00 634 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 845 2.0 35.00 1014 5.00 40.00

3 Ladpur

Milch-animals

Cow 310 2.5 25.00 372 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 275 2.0 35.00 330 5.00 40.00

4 Chundadi

Milch-animals

Cow 175 2.5 25.00 210 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 225 2.0 35.00 270 5.00 40.00

5 Gadh

Milch-animals

Cow 250 2.5 25.00 300 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 300 2.0 35.00 360 5.00 40.00

6 Parvadi

Milch-animals

Cow 350 2.5 25.00 420 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 375 2.0 35.00 450 5.00 40.00

7 Vavdi bujarg

(Part)

Milch-animals

Cow 257 2.5 25.00 308 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 198 2.0 35.00 238 5.00 40.00

8 Thanagarjan

Milch-animals

Cow 150 2.5 25.00 180 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 200 2.0 35.00 240 5.00 40.00

9 Tajpur

Milch-animals

Cow 375 2.5 25.00 450 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 450 2.0 35.00 540 5.00 40.00

10 Jafrabad (Part)

Milch-animals

Cow 150 2.5 25.00 180 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 250 2.0 35.00 300 5.00 40.00

11 Lilesara

Milch-animals

Cow 135 2.5 25.00 162 7.00 30.00

Buffalo 150 2.0 35.00 180 5.00 40.00



6.1.5 Employment This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the people. Employment opportunities will be generated for the people through

different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development. The details of expected employment generation are on the table no.6.1 after the project implement of the watershed project without any obstacle.

Table no. 57: Expected Employment Generation in Project area:

Sr. No.

Names of the villages

Wage employment Self Employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Rinchhiya 0 416 19625 485 20526 0 42 1962 49 2053 0 14 654 16 684

2 Sankali 441 7748 18165 8409 34762 44 775 1816 841 3476 15 258 605 280 1159

3 Ladpur 634 1749 7063 2548 11995 63 175 706 255 1199 21 58 235 85 400

4 Chundadi 0 0 18430 0 18430 0 0 1843 0 1843 0 0 614 0 614

5 Gadh 823 1150 14692 1822 18487 82 115 1469 182 1849 27 38 490 61 616

6 Paravdi 0 1452 13878 1602 16932 0 145 1388 160 1693 0 48 463 53 564

7 Vavadi Buzarg (Part) 128

8 9872 16646 10786 38592 129 987 1665 1079 3859 43 329 555 360 1286

8 Thana Garjan 0 5806 20273 5901 31980 0 581 2027 590 3198 0 194 676 197 1066

9 Tajpur 0 0 15955 0 15955 0 0 1595 0 1595 0 0 532 0 532

10 Jafrabad (Part) 64 1779 6017 1445 9305 6 178 602 145 930 2 59 201 48 310

11 Lilesara 170

5 5228 13362 6608 26903 170 523 1336 661 2690 57 174 445 220 897

6.1.6 Expected Migration Checked

Watershed development works can - Generate new opportunities in local area through the physical treatments of the watershed activities, Increase the production of agriculture produces through adopting updated/ new techniques, The number of crop cultivation will increase as the ground water level available to the farmers in the winter and summer season i.e. the farmers will able to take

second and third crop in their agriculture land. Hence the Watershed development increased demands for labour. This will lead to decrease in the number of seasonal migration from the area.



Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Rinchhiya 59 25 120 30 to 50

2 Sankali 183 95 120 30 to 50

3 Ladpur 143 85 120 30 to 50

4 Chundadi 45 25 120 30 to 50

5 Gadh 177 75 120 30 to 50

6 Parvadi 156 70 120 30 to 50

7 Vavdi Bujarg(Part) 134 65 120 30 to 50

8 Thanagarjan 128 65 120 30 to 50

9 Tajpur 146 75 120 30 to 50

10 Jafrabad (Part) 196 95 120 30 to 50

11 Lilesara 155 2 120 30 to 50

Table no. 59: Per Capita Income

Sr no Project Name Source of Income Pre-Project Expected post -Project

1

IWMP-11

Agriculture 105500 137150

2 Forestry 0.00 5000

3 Animal Husbandry 20300 27600

4 Casual Labour 22600 31500 5 Services 86000 155000

6 Handicraft 0.00 0.00

7 Business 0.00 40000.00 8 Others 13550 18500.00

Average Project 247950 414750

6.1.7 Backward-Forward linkages

The sustainable livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. The details are given as under.



Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 IWMP-11

Backward linkages 0 0 0

Seed certification 0 0 0

Seed supply system 0 1 1

Fertilizer supply system 0 1 1

Pesticide supply system 0 0 0

Credit institutions 0 Bank-1 Bank-1

Water supply 0 0 0

Extension services 0 KVK KVK

Nurseries 0 3 3

Tools/machinery suppliers 0 0 0

Price Support system 0 0 0

Labour 0 0 0

Any other (please specify) 0 0 0

Forward linkages 0 0 0

Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 0 0

Storage (including cold storage) 0 1 1

Road network 0 0 0

Transport facilities 0 0 0

Markets / Mandis 0 1 1

Agro and other Industries 0 0 0

Milk and other collection centers 0 1 1

Labour 0 0 0

Any other (please specify) 0 2(Varmi Compost) 4(Varmi Compost)

6.2 Logical Frame Work Analysis of the Project IWMP-11 of the Panchmahal. Logical Frame Work Analysis (LFA) describes the project goal, objectives, and the activities which will help to achieve the objective. This frame also gives expected results, performance variable indictors, mean of verification and the risk and assumptions of the project. The monitoring team and evaluation team should follow the frame for the achievements. Natural disaster, political intervention and pre-conception of the local people may become obstacle in front the success of the project. It was found that, Person of this area believes that the work related to the bamboo handi-craft lower the social status in the society. Hence after the training of the handi-craft, the people are not using the skill for the betterment.

The means of the verification will help the monitoring team to verify the things where as the performance variable indicator are the indicators of the project which



shows the success or failure.

Logical Framework Analysis of the project IWMP-11 of Panchmahal

PROJECT STRUCTURE EXPECTED RESULT PERFORMANCE VARIABLE INDICATOR MEANS OF VERIFICATION RISK/ ASSUMPTIONS

GOAL: IMPACT:

To ensure sustainable livelihood of the 20 percent of the people of the total area through the natural resources management under Integrated Watershed Management Programme within 5-7 year.

* The income of 300 families will increased

* Annual income of households * Impact assessment study

* Living standard will improve * Annual expenditure and saving of households.

* Evaluation report * Natural disaster (Drought)

* Number of household goods owned by households

* Compare between baseline survey and evaluation report

* Political Intervention

* 30 percent seasonal unemployment will be checked

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunity

* Physical observation

* Availability of water for irrigation in the non rainy season.

* Number of times the people cultivating the farm

* Physical Verification and FGD with farmers

* Pre-conception of the local people mind set.

OBJECTIVE-1: OUTCOMES:

To ensure better income through natural resource management

* Agriculture income will increase * Quantity increases in total agricultural production

* Impact assessment study

* Total agriculture production will increase

* Evaluation report

Soil moisture content will increase *Clear growth of vegetation cover in the project area.

* Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

* Maintenance of the Structure after the project completion

* Number farmers are cultivating the crops in Rabi.

* Trend analysis of crop cultivation

Activity for Objective-1: Outputs:

1. Watershed development Works * Water level will increase * Number of watershed physical structure presents in the project area

* Physical verification



* Number and Quantity of new crops cultivated for commercial purpose in the project area

* Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

2. Water resource development * People will start growing vegetables and new crops for the commercial purpose

* Number of households having drip irrigation system of their houses

* Physical verification

3. Promotion of improved agricultural Practices through crop demonstration and distribution of improved seeds.

* People will start practicing improved technology in the cultivation

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunity

* Observations

OBJECTIVE-2: OUTCOMES

To create an opportunity for self employment for land less and marginal farmers

* Migration will comfort * Number of people migrating for employment opportunity


* People will open new micro-enterprise (Poultry farming, Rose cultivation and other livelihood activities)

* Number of people engaged in poultry farming and other livelihood activities.

* Physical verification/ Photographs

* Unemployment will decrease * Number of people involved in self employment activities

* FGDs and PRA


1. Promotion of Animal husbandry like Dairy farming, Poultry Farming

* People will set-up their micro-enterprise on animal husbandry

* Number of people showing their interest to set-up micro industry

* Observations

2. Training on improvement entrepreneurial skill.

* People will acquire knowledge and understand management of set-up micro enterprise

* Number of small enterprise set-up * Impact assessment study

3. Facilitate for milk production as an income generating activity (Livestock development)

* People will accept the dairy, poultry farming as an income generation activity

* Number of household practicing livestock development as an economic development activity


OBJECTIVE-3: OUTCOMES:

To strengthen local self governance through stimulating local leaders and forming grass

* Presence of strong and dynamic local governance

* Number of meetings initiated by the local leaders.


* Interest of the People.



root peoples’ organization

* People participation and representation will increase

* Number of peoples’ organization present in the grass root level

* Evaluation report, FGD, Observations


1. Awareness and training to the local leaders

* Quality of local leaders will improve and use of more democratic method of decision making.

* Number of Cash resolved within the locality.

* Observations

* Local leaders will take interest to understand the programmes and schemes and utilize for the benefit of the village.

* Number of schemes utilize for the benefit of the villages.

* FGDs and PRA

2. Formation of peoples organization in the grass root level

* There will be proper management of available resources by the people's organisation

* Activities of the watershed is implementing smoothly without any hindrance

* There will be proper implementation of the projects

* Participation of deprived section will increase

* Number of deprived/ poor people participated in the meeting of Gram Sabha

* Representation of local people will increase

* Number of participants represent in the project meeting.



CHAPTER - 7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PROJECT



Introduction: Chapter-7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP-11 Project of Panchmahal maintain the quality and renders the project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the improper implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post-project techniques for project sustainability and research and documentation

for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the area development. 7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:

To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training, human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring.

7.1.1 Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned – First Tire (Monitoring of activities):

This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all activities as per the action plan. The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity. Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs):

To check the output of the activities,project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per the logical frame work. The indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement at the time of implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months. Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes):

Project reviewing committee along with the project co-coordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities. The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of the monitoring system is presented in the table as under.

Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP-11

Tiers of Monitoring

Basis of monitoring Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the Indicator

Monitoring by

First tier Immediate result basis Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organizations

Second Tier Monitoring of Outputs Regular monitoring (Quarterly, half yearly and annually )

Objective oriented Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts and PM)

Third Tier Monitoring of Outcomes Annually but monitoring start from second year onwards?

Goal Oriented 1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU, 2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA



Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning

& implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time.

7.1.2 Evaluation:

The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external agency should use the

monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because these are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project. 7.2 Plans for Post-Project Management/Sustainability Approach:

Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community participation and institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under:

7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures

The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a buffer between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat. An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP-11 project of Panchmahal. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep-rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and medical plants



and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole. Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater. It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship.

7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and post project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help in achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behavior and its economic / ecological implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community.

7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In-built system and mechanisms will be developed for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non Government institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and Users Groups.

Watershed level Committee

Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non political organizations. The detail of the watershed committee is given in the annexure-1.

User Groups

The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities.



CHAPTER - 8

MAPS



SOIL MAP…?



Rinchhiya Annual Action Plan Map



Rinchhiya Baseline Map



Rinchhiya Existing Structure Map



Sankali Annual Action Plan Map



Sankali Baseline Map



Sankali Existing Structure Map



Ladpur Annual Action Plan Map



Ladpur Baseline Map



Ladpur Existing Structure Map



Chundadi Annual Action Plan Map



Chundadi Baseline Map



Chundadi Existing Structure Map



Gadh Annual Action Plan Map



Gadh Baseline Map



Gadh Existing Structure Map



Parvadi Annual Action Plan Map



Parvadi Baseline Map



Parvadi Existing Structure Map



Vavdi Bujarg(Part) Annual Action Plan Map



Vavdi Bujarg(Part) Baseline Map

Vavdi Bujarg(Part) Existing Structure Map



Thanagarjan Annual Action Plan Map



Thanagarjan Baseline Map



Thanagarjan Existing Structure Map



Tajpur Annual Action Plan Map



Tajpur Baseline Map



Tajpur Existing Structure Map



Jafrabad Annual Action Plan



Jafrabad Baseline Map



Jafrabad Existing Structure Map



Lilesara Annual Action Plan Map



Lilesara Baseline Map



Lilesara Existing Structure Map

detail project report , iwmp-5,...

Documents