download 380

Upload: theloniussherek

Post on 25-Feb-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    1/13

    Electricity ResearchAssociation

    Earthing & Bonding ofTelecommunicationsInstallations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide BuildingEarthing Arrangements:A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    2/13

    Contents

    1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................1

    2 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM EARTHING..................................................................................................2

    2.1 Earthing Systems...... .................................................... ........................................................ 3

    2.1.1 Technical Earthing Systems..................................................................................................3

    2.1.2 Typical Earthing Arrangements........... ............................................... ................................... 3

    2.2 Calculation for sizing earthing conductors.............................................................................5

    3 SYSTEM CURRENTS DIVIDING BETWEEN THE NEUTRAL AND EARTHING SYSTEM ..................6

    3.1 Three pole and four pole circuit breakers in dual supplies ................................. ................... 6

    3.1.1 Three pole circuit breakers....................................................................................................6

    3.1.2 Four pole circuit breakers......................................................................................................7

    3.1.3 Three or four pole circuit breakers .............................................. .......................................... 8

    3.2 Multiple earth-neutral connections in a distribution network (Case Study). ........................... 8

    4 Earthing of Uninterruptible Power Supplies............................................................................................9

    4.1 The UPS output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input neutral. ............................... 9

    4.2 Isolation transformer ......................................... .............................................. ......................9

    4.3 Earth fault protection on the static and manual bypass lines...............................................10

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    3/13

    Electricity Research Association

    Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations and

    Colocation Systems Worldwide

    Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and Issues Affecting the Designer

    October 2002

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 2002

    Ove Arup & Partners Ltd

    13 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BQ

    Tel +44 (0)20 7636 1531 Fax +44 (0)20 7752312

    www.arup.com

    Job number 71570/10

    Mike Hastings

    BEng (Hons), CEng, MIEE, MPhilMike is a Senior Electrical Engineer within the Manufacturing Group,specialising in electrical distribution system design, technical advice and

    assistance throughout the company, predominantly related to banks, data

    centres and pharmaceutical facilities. His Experience has been gained

    throughout China, Hong Kong and Europe. More recently he has completed

    research work into supply quality in high voltage and low voltage distribution

    networks. He co-ordinates and presents Arups internal training seminars on

    electrical distribution design strategies to meet clients requirements relating

    to the fundamental question what are we trying to achieve

    Chris J Hewitt

    BEng (Hons), CEng, MIEE

    Chris is an Associate of Ove Arup & Partners. He is the Business Area

    Leader of Arup Mission Critical Facilities Group. He has experience of the

    design, site implementation and project management of large scale data

    centre projects with multi-national blue-chip companies. He has experience

    of the HV and LV design of supply critical facilities including large scale UPS

    and generator systems. His knowledge of electrical design and construction

    management has been gained throughout Europe and South East Asia.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    4/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 1

    1 INTRODUCTION

    This paper has been written so as to outline the fundamental considerations when designing building

    earth systems. The paper particularly relates to the design of building earth systems specifically inmission critical facilities such as data centres.

    The authors have experienced a number of building installations where fundamental design problems

    have exist in the earthing arrangements. The paper is not intended to address the issues of earthing

    within technical or server spaces where the object is to create a low impendance path for high

    frequency leakage currents. Instead, the paper presents more fundamental arrangements upstream of

    the technical space where earth connections are more important to the overall safe operation of the

    building with minimal supply interruption.

    The paper concentrates on the following:

    Neutral current paths, presenting a case study where neutral current was allowed to divide

    between the neutral and earth conductor systems. The following mitigating measures arediscussed:

    Use of three or four pole circuit breakers.

    Removal of multiple earths in a distribution network.

    In addition, the paper presents two methods for earthing uninterruptible power supply systems, one for

    a more simple single sources system, and one for a more complex multiple sources system.

    Throughout the paper, it is emphasised that distribution systems must be designed as a single entities

    and therefore.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    5/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 2

    2 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM EARTHING

    Essentially, all plant that generates electricity or changes system voltage levels (i.e. transformers)

    must to be earthed. There are fundamentally two types of earthing systems:

    1. Protective earthing for protection of persons against electric shock.

    2. Technical earthing (sometime referred to as functional or clean or IT/communications earthing)

    for noise suppression or stable earth reference.

    In general, metalwork that may become live during normal use or during a fault should be bonded to

    the protective earthing system. The protective earthing system must therefore be bonded at some

    point to the technical earthing system (if present). Technical earthing systems are not specifically

    designed to clear earth fault currents (although by their nature they may be capable of performing this

    function). Instead, they are designed to provide a high integrity, low impendance path to earth for high

    frequency leakage currents and noise caused by the operation of switch mode power supplies.

    As an example, for a server rack containing 8no. industry standard 2U servers, the leakage current

    can typically be 10mA 20mA.. Clearly in the UK, compliance with the requirements of Section 607 of

    BS 7671 is imperative for safety of personnel.

    In general, the star points of the secondary winding of a distribution transformer, low voltage generator

    or UPS inverters are normally solidly earthed. Solidly earthing the neutral point ensures that voltages

    to earth will not exceed the phase voltage. If several sources are installed, regulations and practices

    allow each transformer neutral connection to be taken to a common earthing bar; separate earth

    electrodes are not required.

    In broad terms, distribution systems are earthed for the following reasons:

    To limit voltages due to impressed surges (including lightning) and faults giving a measure ofsafety to personnel.

    To provide a known maximum voltage in the system.

    To facilitate clearance of line to earth faults.

    To reduce fire risk due to arcing earth faults.

    To provide a low impendance route for high frequency leakage currents.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    6/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 3

    2.1 Earthing Systems

    2.1.1 Technical Earthing Systems

    Typically, technical earthing systems are subject to high frequency earth leakage currents of up to

    30MHz. As the frequency increases, the distribution of current across the cross section of an earth

    conductor becomes less uniform. Consequently, impedance of the earthing system increases. This

    phenomenon is known as skin effects. It is possible to calculate the effect on the cable impendance of

    skin effect by using equations indicated in IEC287. Typically, to mitigate the cause of skin effects it is

    suggested that the technical earth system is designed to incorporate many parallel paths.

    2.1.2 Typical Earthing Arrangements

    2.1.2.1 TT System

    TT systems have independent earthing system for the source earth and protective earth.

    Figure 3.1 TT Earthing Arrangement

    If a fault to earth occurs, current will flow from the phase conductors, into the protective earth system,

    back through the earth (ground) to the transformer star point (thus completing the circuit). Since the

    impedance between protective earth electrodes and source earth electrodes is relatively high, in TT

    systems earth fault currents are relatively low when compared to other earthing systems such as TNS.

    Therefore, it is normal practice to install earth fault protection through the installation.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    7/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 4

    2.1.2.2 Earthing systems - TNS system

    TNS systems use a single earth system for both the source earth and protective earth. Earth fault

    currents will be of a similar magnitude to a phase fault. The high fault currents will ensure minimum

    circuit disconnection times. Therefore, it is not normally necessary to install earth fault protection.

    Figure 3.2 TNS Earthing Arrangement

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    8/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 5

    2.2 Calculation for sizing earthing conductors

    Fault current paths from the position of the fault comprise protective conductors and other random

    paths in parallel, such as structural metalwork. Calculations must be based on the actual known

    conductors, including sheaths and circuit protective conductors, and cannot make allowance for

    fortuitous parallel paths.

    Earth faults occurring at main switchboards close to the transformer will develop high currents, most of

    which will return to the transformer star point via main bonding conductors.

    Earthing conductors are sized in accordance to adiabatic conditions and to ensure the earth loop

    impedance is low enough to operate the protective device in the event of an earth fault. Overload

    protection is omitted, since the earthing conductors are not intending to carry steady state current

    during normal operation

    The adiabatic formula can be used:

    Equation 3.3

    Where

    S = Cross-sectional area of conductor (mm2). Standard size conductors should be chosen.

    I = r.m.s. fault current (amps) (ignoring current limiting by the circuit protective conductor).

    t = Disconnection time for operation of the circuit protective device (seconds). For disconnection

    longer than five seconds, equation is pessimistic.

    k = A factor related to initial and f inal temperature of the earthing conductors, conductor and insulation

    materials. (For copper PVC cables, bunched k=115)

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    9/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 6

    3 SYSTEM CURRENTS DIVIDING BETWEEN THE

    NEUTRAL AND EARTHING SYSTEM

    Under normal operating conditions it is important to ensure that any neutral currents caused by

    unbalanced loads return along the correct neutral conductor and do not divide and flow along a

    parallel earth path. Conversely, under earth fault conditions the fault current must low through the

    correct earth path and not via a parallel neutral path.

    There are a number of reasons why neutral currents could be flowing in the earthing system.

    Three pole + solid neutral (TP+N) circuit breakers have been installed when four pole circuit

    breaks should have been used.

    Multiple earth neutral earth connections.

    3.1 Three pole and four pole circuit breakers in dual supplies

    Four pole switchgear is required for any three phase four wire systems with multiple infeeds, whether

    these infeeds be transformer, generators or a combination of the two.

    The correct installation for a multiple infeed switchboard would be to install 4 pole circuit breakers on

    the incoming feeds (transformers and generators) and any bus-couples.

    Additionally, if there are any auto-changeover devices down-stream of the main switchboard, these

    should be 4 pole.

    3.1.1 Three pole circuit breakers

    The three pole circuit breaker situation is shown in the two figures 4.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2, which shows,

    the neutral current will divide between the neutral and earth conductors.

    Figure 4.1.1.1 Electrical schematic with three pole circuit breakers

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    10/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 7

    Figure 4.1.1.2 Neutral current dividing between the earthing system and neutral conductors

    3.1.2 Four pole circuit breakers

    This division of the neutral current could be prevented, if the bus section circuit breaker and the

    transformer circuit breakers are four pole. The four pole circuit breaker situation is shown in the two

    figures 4.1.2.1 and 4.1.2.2.

    Figure 4.1.2.1 Electrical schematic with four pole circuit breakers

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    11/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 8

    Figure 4.1.2.2 Neutral current does not dividing between the earthing system and neutral conductors

    3.1.3 Three or four pole circuit breakers

    It can be seen that the only circuit configurations that eliminates the divided neutral current problem is

    utilising four pole circuit breakers with the neutral to earth connection up stream of the incoming of the

    circuit breaker.

    3.2 Multiple earth-neutral connections in a distribution network (Case

    Study).

    Where distribution systems are modified to increase the system capacity or during the installation of

    UPS, it is common to inadvertently introduce additional earth-neutral connections. If there are

    additional earth-neutral connections downstream of the main earth neutral connection, parallel neutral

    paths are created via the earthing system.

    During a recent site survey, substantial currents were found to be following in the earth system of a

    telecommunications facility. It was noted that the earth current was varying as the building electrical

    load changed. Visual inspections established that the star point of transformer was directly earthed

    and four pole circuit breaker were used throughout the system. When reviewing the current flow within

    the earthing system, the only feasible source of the earth current was due to a second earth neutral

    link in the newly installed sub-switchboard.

    Without shutting down the switchboard, it was not possible to physically verify the presence of the

    earth neutral links within the sub-switchboard. Therefore, as built drawings were obtained from the

    manufacturer. These confirmed that the earth neutral links were installed in the switchboard.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    12/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 9

    4 Earthing of Uninterruptible Power Supplies

    Uninterruptible power supply systems are an integral part of the electrical distribution network and

    their design must be tailored to that of the electrical distribution network, such that it operates as asingle entity. Therefore, there must be close coordination between the system designers and a

    nominated UPS manufacture.

    For safety reasons, the output neutral of the UPS must be electrically connected to earth. There are

    number of solution to achieve this:

    The UPS output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input neutral.

    Isolation transformer.

    4.1 The UPS output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input

    neutral.

    This solution is ideal for simple networks with only one source, as the neutral can be solid (i.e. not

    switched) throughout the entire system. Consequently, four pole circuit breakers cannot be used

    upstream of the UPS.

    Figure 5.1 Schematic of a UPS system were the output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input

    neutral

    4.2 Isolation transformer

    Where distribution systems incorporate two or more electrical sources, four pole circuits have to be

    utilised for reasons previously discussed. In this case, in the event that the circuit breaker upstream of

    the UPS is opened, the UPS will lose it earth reference. Therefore the UPS must have its own earth-

    neutral connection. This can be achieved via a deltastar isolation transformer or delta /zigzag

    isolation transformer with the star point connected to earth. The UPS output neutral and earthing

    system is electrically isolated from the upstream earthing and neutral system.

  • 7/25/2019 Download 380

    13/13

    Electricity Research Association Earthing & Bonding of Telecommunications Installations andColocation Systems

    Worldwide Building Earthing Arrangements: A Case Study and IssuesAffecting the Designer

    Arup

    C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 -EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMSWORLDWIDE.DOC

    Copyright Ove Arup & Partners LtdOctober 2002

    Page 10

    4.3 Earth fault protection on the static and manual bypass lines

    Earth fault protection must not be utilised on the static bypass and manual bypass lines. When the

    UPS is switched from the static bypass to the manual bypass the two feeders are in parallel. The

    current in each phase may not divide equally between the two parallel paths, and consequently, this

    will be detected by RCD (residual current Devices) as leakage current or earth fault. Such an

    installation with RCD protection would be prevalent in Asia, with Singapore as an example.

    Figure 5.2 Schematic of a UPS system were the output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input

    neutral