완성차조립 부품공급의 지역적 물류체계 · - 621 -? 1. 서론 1) 연구목적...

19
- 621 - 1. 서론 1) 연구목적 2011년 한국 자동차 산업은 제조업 중에서 종업 원 수, 생산액, 부가가치에서 각각 약 10%를 차지하 는 기간산업이다. 이러한 자동차 산업에 부품을 공급 하는 부품산업은 최근 10여 년간 기술경쟁력이 크게 향상되어 비약적인 발전했는데, 이것은 글로벌 시장 에서 현대·기아자동차의 위상이 높아지면서 부품공 대한지리학회지 제50권 제6호 2015(621~639) 완성차조립 부품공급의 지역적 물류체계 韓柱成* Regional Physical Distribution Systems of Parts Supply for Automobile Assembly in Korea Ju-Seong Han* 요약 : 1990년대 후반 이후 완성차 메이커의 구조조정, 외국 부품공급업체의 국내진출, 글로벌 차원에서의 부 품조달, 산업의 IT화에 따른 개방적 부품 조달체계의 확산, 그리고 모듈화 등이 수직적인 부품조달체계를 완화 시키는 요인으로 작용하고 있다. 이와 같은 완성차 생산의 내외 환경변화에 따라 본 연구에서는 완성차 조립공 장에 1차 공급업체와 모듈기업이 공급하는 부품의 지역적 물류체계가 어떻게 이루어지고 있는가를 밝히는 것 을 목적으로 기존문헌 및 인터뷰 조사를 실시했다. 그 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 완성차 부품공급의 지역적 물 류체계는 완성차 조립공장을 중심으로 공장 내에나 인접지역에 모듈공장이 입지하는데, 1차 공급업체의 부품 은 근접권에서 살펴본 바와 같이 공급의 분산비율이 비교적 높게 나타나 JIT의 다빈도 소량배송보다는 자동차 조립공장 인근에 통합물류센터를 설치해 부품을 공급하고 여기에서 다시 조립공장에 납품을 한다. 이렇게 함 으로서 부품공급업체나 조립공장 모두에게 배송비용을 줄여주고 부품의 안정적인 공급이 이루어지기 때문에 중층적인 모듈 반제품을 위한 부품공급도 이와 같은 방식을 취한다. 주요어 : 적기생산방식, 모듈화, 부품공급, 물류체계, 완성차 조립 Abstract : The aim of this study is to consider the physical distribution system of assembly supplied from 1 st supplier and module corporation to automobile assembly plant through analysis of existing literatures and interview survey. The major findings of this study are as follows. Parts supply of automobile are to bind together with many regional parts supplier than using multi frequency and small delivery of JIT. Regional physical distribution center of joint parts and integrated physical distribution information center is to be installed in neighboring region of automobile assembly plant in order to reduce the transport cost by designating and activating multiple physical distribution and transport companies in each automobile assembly plant and turning into effective high volume shipping system. Key Words : just-in time, modularization, parts supply, physical distribution system, automobile assembly * 충북대학교 명예교수(Emeritus Professor, Chungbuk National University), jshan@chungbuk.ac.kr

Upload: others

Post on 31-Aug-2019

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

50-603.indd , , 10%
.
10
,
·
50 6 2015(621~639)

Regional Physical Distribution Systems of Parts Supply for Automobile Assembly in Korea
Ju-Seong Han*
: 1990 , ,
, IT ,
.
1
. .
, 1
JIT
.

.
: , , , ,
Abstract : The aim of this study is to consider the physical distribution system of assembly supplied from 1st supplier and module corporation to automobile assembly plant through analysis of existing literatures and interview survey. The major findings of this study are as follows. Parts supply of automobile are to bind together with many regional parts supplier than using multi frequency and small delivery of JIT. Regional physical distribution center of joint parts and integrated physical distribution information center is to be installed in neighboring region of automobile assembly plant in order to reduce the transport cost by designating and activating multiple physical distribution and transport companies in each automobile assembly plant and turning into effective high volume shipping system.
Key Words : just-in time, modularization, parts supply, physical distribution system, automobile assembly
* (Emeritus Professor, Chungbuk National University), [email protected]
- 622 -

.

,
.
1997
, ,
, IT
, (modularization)1)

(, 2004, 173).
, ,
,

.

,

,

.


(, 2004, 185-186).
·

(1993) .
·
,
,
, .
(1987)
,
(1999)
.

(2007; 2008) .


(2010)

(1984), ,

(2001) .

1

.
1

.


.

, 2013
71.4% ·
, ·
,
, ·
.
OEM
, , 2013
74 8,303 67.8%
, 28.1%, 4.1%
.

.
1 , 1
2 , 2
3 .
- 623 -
35.7%(·, 2013, 158)
.
2013 9522) 1
,
38.6% ,
(37.0%) (20.3%) (
1).
1
.



·


.

.

, 3) 60.4%, 4)
31.0%, 5) 6.1%, 6) 2.4%
(·, 2012, 79).


.
·, GM,
, .7)
2014
2014 ,
2015 1~5

.
669 74.5% ,
229 1/3( 2).
898

, ,
, GM ,
54.2% .
44.2%,
79.2%
( 1).
48.4%



( 3).
1. (2013)

347 332 322 182 243 221 200 1,847(898)
(%) 18.8 18.0 17.4 9.8 13.2 12.0 10.8 100.0
(%)
38.6 37.0 35.9 20.3 27.1 24.6 22.3 -
( ) 224,402 177,411 65,850 20,564 11,547 3,312 4,266 507,352
% 44.2 35.0 13.0 4.1 2.3 0.6 0.8 100.0
: (http://www.kaica.or.kr).
,

(·, 2012, 70).
1) JIT

8)
. JIT
. ,
. ,
. ,
(lead time) . ,
· ·
(, 2005, 197). JIT

(Lean)9).

(, 2002; ·, 2004). JIT


JIT
. JIT
,


Estall(1985)
. JIT

(Hudson and Sadler, 1992)

Schoenberger (1987),

Schamp(
, 2005, 198),
·
(Mair et al., 1988).
JIT
JIT
2. (2013)
50 50∼99 100∼299 300∼1,000 1,001
247 177 218 27* 191 38 898
% 27.5 47.0 25.5 100.0
: (http://www.kaica.or.kr).

1 2 3 4 5 6
435 228 96 65 46 28 898
% 48.4 25.4 10.7 7.2 5.1 3.1 100.0
: , 2014, 2014 , 30.
- 625 -



.



. JIT

,
(Linge, 1991) .
·
.
JIT
(·, 2006,
40-41).

.
(1994; 1995; 1998) ()
() (
)
.
, ,

(milk run)10)
.


.
,

(, 2005,
474).

,
JIT .
.

JIT
(, 2005, 474).

, ,

, · ,
, ·
,
, JIT
(Linge, 1992).

,
·

(2008) .

JIT
(Just in Se-
quence, JIS)11)



.
ization), (deverticalization),
, ·
(Kaneko and Nojiri, 2008, 158-
159). Storper and Salais(1997)
(possible world)12) ‘ ’
‘ ’

- 626 -


(module production)
(cell production)13)

(Kaneko and Nojiri, 2008, 171).

(set)

.14)

(Kaneko and Nojiri, 2008, 158).
(codified knowledge)
(implicit knowledge)
.
.

,

.

. ,
,
(Kaneko and Nojiri, 2008,
158).
·· ,
(·, 2006, 46).


Frigant and
Lung(2002) . Takeno

,

.
1990

(Kaneko and
Nojiri, 2008, 159).

(carpeak)
,
·
,

.
2·3

. (2007)


,



.


.

.
(2011)

, ,
,
2000
.

,

. ·(2013)
Gereffi (2005, 89)
,
- 627 -
(captive)

,


.
.

(Hamilton, 1995, 13-42). JIT



.

.
,

.
3.

.

.
, 3
2 2 1
,
1
.
(, )
1 1
.
70%
,

(·, 2012, 67-68).
15)
(long-term relationship) ,


(·, 2012, 72-73).

.



.
, ·,
, ·, GM
, ,
,
,
.
- 628 -

898 22.4% ,
, , . ·
56 ,
(53), (50),
(43), 40,
(35), (33),
(27), ,
26, (23),
(22), (21), (20)

( 4, 2)

(Scott, 1988) .
2
, ·
12.3%
, ··GM·
(10.7%), GM(10.6%) , 46.4%

( 5).


.
,
16)
·
17)
.
·· () ,
·· 51
,
347 14.7% .
33,
53, 104, 1 46
.
····,
50 14.4% 4. · (2013)
· %
35 3.9 84 9.4 54 6.0 58 6.5 26 2.9 10 1.1 39 4.3 6 0.7 201 22.4 3 0.3 23 2.6 82 9.1 71 7.9 7 0.8 59 6.6 140 15.6
0 0.0
898 100.0
- 629 -
.
·, 23
6.6% .
13, 23,
44, 60 .

, ···
23 ,
332
6.9% .
14, 25, 41,
50 .
·
, 28 8.4%
. 22,
38, 41, 63
.
···· , 61
18.4% .
34,
44, 59, 71
.
····
, 98
GM 322
30.4% .
23, 38,
43, 67 .
·,
12 3.7% .
18, 22
, 54, 64
. ·,
· ,
37 11.5% .
20, 27,
79, 83 .

··· ,
53
181
29.3% .
37, 52,
99, 107 .
·
···
68
, 56, 65
. ·,
· ,
25 10.3% .
19, 28
, 46, 59
5.
% %
29 3.0 ··GM 23 2.4 20 2.1 ·· 61 6.4
GM 101 10.6 ··GM· 102 10.7 · 117 12.3 442 46.4
·GM 1 0.1 54 5.7
·GM 2 0.2 952 100.0
- 630 -

43
,
3.7~30.4% .

27, 39,
JIT


.

,
6. ·


··




··
···




··
··,






, ·,
43.3 - 26.5 38.6 103.7 107.0
- 631 -
115.0 , 3 4 (2.2%) 205.0
, 101 (55.8%) 3
418.7 .
, 2001

30 Lee (
, 2007, 442)
180 2
(Mair et al., 1988, 366)
.
1~2 (Glasmeier and
McCluskey, 1987, 154-155).



18).
(Electronic Data Interchange,


(Korea
Network eXchange, KNX)
.
1

,
. ·


(Consolidate
Center, C/C)19)
( ·A
).
, GM (Lead
C/C
1.5
.


(A ·B
).


,

.
(outsourcing)
,

(, 2002, 70).
·

.


1995
(, 2004,
169-170; Rogers and Bottaci, 1997).
- 632 -


. 2004
12.5~36.0%
(Volkswagen Passat)
37%(, 2007, 41-42)



,
3 4 (
, 2004, 165-166;
).

,20)
,21) 22)
(,
2007, 48-50).
1 ·
. 2011 1

15.6% ,
(8.1%), (2.0%),
,

(, 2004, 190).
, (rear chassis), ,
, (roof head lin-
ing), (door sealed) 6
. 2002
MIPS(Mobis Integrated Procurement System)
2004
SMART(Smart MOBIS Agent for Reaching Global
Top 10) ·

(
, 2007, 344). 1998
1999
1
. 1( )·2
( )
RV(Recreational Vehicle)
,


.
2002
·

. 2002

, 2002
3


(
·
,

.
15, 10
20 .
3
( , 2011, 365).
1976
- 633 -
2004
2009
2014
3 .
,
· ,
,
,

,
.
(
,
,
.


.
,
,
,

.
, JIT

.


,


.


(Helper, 1990).
(made in plant) , ,


,

,

.
20

. 1
300~400 ,
169
, 1 990
1
5.9, 303
1 1,504
1
5.0(, 2001,
·
5 (wing body)
.
· 2/3
,
·
.
2~3 8~11
.
1~5 ,
.
- 634 -


1 (A
).
,
· .

2
,
.
provider) 1
·.

1 650 ,
(synchro) 23) .
8 2
5 11
50% 80 ,
38 .

( ).
3

. 3
·
. ·
, GM ,

, A/S
JIS JIT ,
.
C/C
, 2~3
. 6~7
15 20 ,
(vendor)
. C/C ·

,

.
5.


,
.
3/4 , 15
,

. ·· , ··
, ···,
·, ,
, , ,

.

.

27, 39
, JIT

.

229, 2 56
.
.

.
48.4% ,


.

,
.
·
2/3
C/C
. ,
GM ,

.

.
····
·
,
15,
10 20
3 .
··
, ·
,
, ,
3 .
,

, JIT
.

.
, 1
5.9,
303 1
5.0
1~2 . ·

2/3 , ·
.
1~5 3/4 ,

.
, 1
.
1 650
, .

.
3
, ·
, GM ,
JIS JIT
, . C/C

,

.
C/C
.

, 1

JIT
C/C
.


- 636 -

.

. (instrument
panel) , , ,
(cockpit:
, , , , ),
,
(suspension), (steer-
ing), (brake), [chassis:
(axle), , (sub-frame)
40 ],
, , ,
(front-end), , .


(Sturgeon, 2002).
2) 54 .
3)
,
.
4)

.
,
.
.
0.6%, 0.8%
1% .
8) () JIT
,
(multi-skilled)
.
. ,
,
. ,
.
, JIT .
JIT

. JIT
. ,

(Kaneko and Nojiri, 2008, 156-158).
9)

JIT

.
10)
(lot) JIT
.

(
, 2001, 553-554).
.

,
.


.
11) JIS , , 3

(real) ‘’ .
12) ,
4
. , ,
, .

,
,
(, 2015, 3).
13) ,

,
.
14)
. 1 , 1
- 637 -

,
. 2 1 2·3

. 3
1

. 4 (black/gray box
design) 1
··
.



1990 (,
2002).
,

,

,
.
.
17) · (http://map.naver.com)
.
1995 .
249 81.5% 1989
(, 2014, 125-251).

.
JIT
(subassembly) ,

.
20) ,
(architec-
ture) ,
.
,

.
22) ·
.
23) , (
)
(,
2001, 553).
,
.
- -,” ,
( 92), 351-385.
,” , 42, 434-452.
, 2008, “
,” , 11(3), 125-138.
,” , 2, 153-194.
, .
-,” , 25(3), 35-54.
, 1987,
- -,
.
.
- -,
.
- 638 -

.
( 50), 186-213.
- -,” , 47,
149-184.
,” (
), 38(4), 99-123.
, 356-376.
-
, .
--,”
, 50, 26-45.
1-24.
just-in-time system and its locational implication,
Area, 17, 129-133.
and supplying relationship in modular produc-
tion, Actes du GERPISA, 34, 34-49.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T., 2005, The
governance of global value chains, Review of Inter-
national Political Economy, 12, 78-104.
Glasmeier, A.K. and McCluskey, R.E., 1987, U.S. auto
parts production: an analysis of the organization
and location of a changing industry, Economic Geo-
graphy, 63, 142-159.
and its Environment: Spatial Perspectives, Aveburg,
Gower.
US and Japanese auto industries: an exit/voice
approach, Business and Economic History, 19, 153-
162.
and the European automotive components indus-
try, International Journal of Physical Distribution
and Logistics, 22, 40-45.
Kaneko, J. and Nojiri, W., 2008, The logistics of just-in
time between parts suppliers and car assemblers
in Japan, Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 155-
173.
Economic Geography, 67, 316-332.
Australian Geographer, 22, 67-76.
Mair, A., Florida, R. and Kenney, M., 1988, The new geo-
graphy of automobile production: Japanese trans-
plants in North America, Economic Geography, 64,
352-373.
systems: a new manufacturing paradigm, Journal
of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 147-156.
Schoenberger, E., 1987, Technological and organizational
change in automobile production: spatial implica-
- 639 -
Scott, A.J., 1988, New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production
Organization and Regional Development in North
America and Western Europe, Pion, London.
Storper, M. and Salais, R., 1997, Worlds of Production: The
Action Frameworks of the Economy, Harvard Uni-
versity Press, Cambridge.
American industrial organization, Industrial and
Corporate Change, 13, 451-496.
1106(, )(: jshan@chungbuk.
Ogeum-dong, 4 Macheon-ro 7gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05656
Korea (e-mail: [email protected])