february – april 2016 - ip unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/seminar-1... ·...

44
February – April 2016

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

February – April 2016

Page 2: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

WelcomeHousekeeping/admin

§  A"endanceregister(minimuma"endance/examrequirements)§  H2O/accesstovideolecturesworkingok?Firstimpressions?§  ShortroundofintroducCons(name,background,whyCopyrightX)§  Pleasemakeuseoftheforum§  ShortroundofintroducCons(name,background,whyCopyrightX)

§  Pleasemakeuseoftheforum…

Page 3: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)
Page 4: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Welcome

Syllabus§  FoundaConsofCopyright/Fairness&PersonalityTheories(17February2016)§  SubjectMa"erofCopyright(24February2016)§  Authorship/WelfareTheory(02March2016–Bram)§  <<break>>§  MechanicsofCopyright(16March2016)§  EconomicandMoralrights(23March2016)§  CopyrightExcepConsandLimitaCons(30March2016)§  <<break>>§  Copyrightinfringement/CulturalTheory(13April2016)§  Remedies(20April2016)§  Copyright,InnovaCon&Development(25April2016)

Page 5: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

WelcomeOverarchinggoalsofCopyrightX:UCT§  Provideanoverviewaboutcopyrightlaw§  ExamineanddiscusstheimpactofcopyrightoncreaCvity§  CreateawarenessabouttheunderlyingtheoriesforcopyrightprotecCon§  Discusshowcopyrightcouldbeimproved§  Analysetheimpactoftechnologyoncopyright§  ProvideSouthAfricancontexttotheUSandglobalperspecLves

Page 6: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

<twomorethings>

Page 7: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Special Event

24February13h00

Page 8: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Seminar1

FoundaKonsofCopyright&

FairnessandPersonalityTheories

17February2016

Page 9: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Overview

PartI§  HistoryofcopyrightinSouthAfrica§  InternaConalinstrumentsrelevantforSouthAfrica§  KeyrequirementsforthesubsistenceofcopyrightinSouthAfrica§  Ideas,facts,expressionPartII§  Copyrighttheories,overview§  Thefairnesstheory§  Thepersonalitytheory§  Casestudy:FiYyshadesofDorianGray

Page 10: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Part 0

Page 11: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Let’s start with this…

DoyouneedtoknowmoreabouttheSouthAfricanlegalsystem–courts,branchesoflawetc?

Page 12: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Let’s start with this…

Whatiscopyright?

“Copyright is the exclusive right in relation to work embodying intellectual content to do or

to authorize to do certain acts in relation to that work.”

Page 13: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Part I

Page 14: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160214/08293233599/sony-music-issues-takedown-copyright-lecture-about-music-copyrights-harvard-law-

professor.shtml

Page 15: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

History of copyright law in SA§  Roman-Dutch‘commonlaw’copyright(1803-1916)

§  1803CopyrightActoftheBatavianRepublicbecamecommonlawoftheCape,Transvaal,OrangeFreestateandNatalprovinces

§  ProvincialCopyrightActs

§  Patent,TradeMarks,DesignsandCopyrightAct9of1916§  IncorporaConoftheUnitedKingdomCopyrightActof1911plusvariaCons

§  CopyrightAct63of1965§  BasedonUnitedKingdomCopyrightActof1956whichhadrepealedthe1911

CopyrightAct.

§  CopyrightAct98of1978§  BasedonUnitedKingdomCopyrightActof1956,butdepartsonindependent

courseinthefieldopcopyright§  AmendedseveralCmessince

Page 16: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

History of copyright law in SA

§  S43:ApplicaKontoworksmadebeforethecommencementoftheAct

ThegeneralprincipleisthattheActappliestoworksmadebeforecommencementoftheAct

butitdoesn’tcreate©inworksinwhich©couldn’texistpriorto1965,

anditdoesn’taffectownership,dura1onofcopyrightwhichalreadyexistedbefore.

Page 17: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Relevant international copyright treaties, aiming to harmonise copyright laws

§  BerneConvenKonfortheProtecConofLiteraryandArCsCcWorks[1886]

§  AgreementonTradeRelatedAspectsofIntellectualPropertyRights(TRIPS)[1994]§  WIPOCopyrightTreaty(WCT)[1996]§  MarrakeshTreatyonexcepConsforthevisuallyimpaired[2013]

Page 18: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Berne Convention

§  ProtecConforliteraryandarKsKcworks§  FocusonrightofreproducKon(s9)§  Protectsmoralrights§  Noenforcementmechanisms(“noteeth”)§  Inforce,169parCes

SouthAfrica§  Subscribedtothe1948BrusselstextoftheconvenCon(asfarassubstanCvelaw)

§  Notdirectlyboundbythefulltextofthelatest1971Paristext(soonlyboundbyprevioustexts)oftheconvenCon;butboundviaTRIPS

Page 19: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

TRIPS

§  IncorporatesprotecKonfromBerneConvenKon§  BroadenedprotecCon:computerprograms,databases

§  NoprotecKonofmoralrights§  DetailedrulesregardingenforcementandDisputeSedlementmechanisms(‘teeth’)

SouthAfrica§  AsamemberoftheWTOboundbyTRIPS

Page 20: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

WCT

§  IntroducesrightsofdistribuKon,rentalandcommunicaKontothepublic&addressescomputerprogramsasliteraryworks(art4)anddatabases(art5)

§  AnK-circumvenKonprovisions

SouthAfrica§  Signedin1997buthasnotyetraKfiedthe‘WIPOCopyrightTreaty’dueto

fearofnegaCveimpactonitssocialandeconomicdevelopment

Page 21: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Marrakesh Treaty

§  AddressesPublishedWorks§  PermitscreaConofso-calledaccessibleformatcopiesandallowcross-bordertransfertoimproveaccessforvisuallyimpairedpersons

§  ForthefirstCme,focuswasonlimitaKonsofcopyrightratherthanexpansionofrights

§  Notyetinforce–14parCes;20areneeded

SouthAfrica§  notsigned,notraCfied

Page 22: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Important elements of those international treaties

§  MinimumstandardsforprotecCon§  NaKonaltreatmentprinciple§  NoformaliKesforcopyrightprotecCon§  Three-steptest

Page 23: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Important elements of those international treaties

Three-steptest(ascontainedins9oftheBerneConvenCon):“Itshallbeama7erforlegisla1oninthecountriesoftheUniontopermitthe

reproduc1onofsuchworksincertainspecialcases,providedthatsuchreproduc1ondoesnotconflictwithanormalexploita1onoftheworkanddoesnotunreasonablyprejudicethelegi1mateinterestsoftheauthor.”

Page 24: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

South Africa is not part of any regional agreements concerning copyright (e.g.,

OAPI) – but be aware of FTAs

Page 25: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Copyright protection is territorial!

(P)?

The Internet

Page 26: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Requirements for copyright protection in SA

§  Materialform§  Qualifiedperson§  Originality

Page 27: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Material form

§  Workmustbereducedtomaterialform(inwriCngorothermaterialform)

§  Specialcaseforbroadcastsandprogramme-carryingsignals§  Broadcastsmusthavebeenbroadcast§  Programme-carryingsignalsmusthavebeentransmi"edviasatellite

Idea/expressiondichotomy

Page 28: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Qualified person

§  SecCon3(1)

“CopyrightshallbeconferredbythissecCononeverywork,eligibleforcopyright,ofwhichtheauthoror,inthecaseofaworkofjointauthorship,anyoneoftheauthorsisattheCmetheworkorasubstanCalpartthereofismade,aqualifiedperson,thatis—

(a)inthecaseofanindividual,apersonwhoisaSouthAfricanciKzenorisdomiciledorresidentintheRepublic;or(b)inthecaseofajurisCcperson,abodyincorporatedunderthelawsoftheRepublic[…]”

Isthereaproblemwiththis?

Page 29: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Originality

Page 30: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Originality in the U.S.§  Lowstandard§  Notrequired:novelty,quality,noncommercial,

lawful

§  But:AccordingtoFeist,“somedegreeof

creaKvityisrequired”;merelabour(or“sweatofthebrow”)isnotsufficient.

Page 31: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Originality in the EU

§  Higherstandard§  Differentstandardsindifferentcountries§  But:EUDirecKves&ECJcaseshaveresultedin

someharmonisaKon…[also:seeappendix]

Page 32: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Originality in SA§  NotdefinedintheAct§  Loworiginalitystandard§  DoesNOTmeanworkmustbeunique,invenCveor

novel

§  Butmustbeproductoftheauthor’sownlabour§  Ma"erofdegreedependingontheamountofskill&

effortinvolvedinthemakingofthework

§  àsweatofthebrow

§  Factthataworkiscopied(andpossiblyinfringescopyright)doesNOTmeanitcannotbeoriginal(secCon2(3))“IfaworkiseligibleforcopyrightprotecCon,animprovementorrefinementofthatworkwouldsimilarlybeeligibleforcopyright,eveniftheimprovedworkinvolvedaninfringementofcopyrightintheoriginalwork,ifitsaCsfiestherequirementoforiginality.Thatwillbethecaseonlyiftheimprovementorrefinementisnotsuperficial.ThealteraContotheoriginalworkmustbesubstanKal.”(Hauptt/aSoQCopyvBrewersMarkeLngIntelligence(Pty)Ltd)

Page 33: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Originality in SA§  LowerstandardthanevenintheUS:creaKvityisnotrequired

§  Factsarenotprotected–butthe

expressionofsuchfactsmaywellbe…Examples:

q  ListofrailwaystaConsq  Chronologicalfixtureoffootballgamesq  Directoryoftelefaxusersq  Catalogueandpricelistq  Furtherreading:

h"p://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/arCcle/viewFile/101893/91942

Page 34: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

More on Originality in the annex

Page 35: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Propriety of work?

§  Willthelawprotectworkswhichareconsideredimproper,indecentorlackinginpropriety?

§  NothinginCopyrightActaboutpropriety§  DividedopinionsonwhetherproprietyisacondiConforsubsistenceofawork,or

onlyaffectstheenforcementofcopyright

Page 36: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Database Directive

§  DirecCve96/9/ECof11March1996§  Adatabaseisoriginalifitis“theauthor'sownintellectualcreaCon”(inthe

selecConorarrangementsofcontents)§  andnoothercriteriasuchas“aestheCcorqualitaCvecriteria”shallbeapplied§  ButallowsprotecConof“investmentinobtaining,verifyingorpresenCngthe

contents”Sources:Recital15etseq.andArt.3(1)

Appendix - originality

Page 37: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Software Directive

§  DirecCve91/250/EECof14May1991,now2009/24/ECof23April2009(codifiedversion)

§  Acomputerprogramisoriginalifitis“theauthor'sownintellectualcreaCon”§  and“noothercriteriasuchasqualitaCveoraestheCcmeritsshallbeapplied”Sources:Recital8andArt.1(3)

Page 38: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

Copyright Term Directive

§  DirecCve93/98/EEC,nowbyDirecCve2006/116/ECof12December2006(codifiedversion)

§  Aphotographisoriginalifitis“theauthor'sownintellectualcreaCon”§  and“noothercriteriasuchasmeritorpurpose”shallbeapplied§  ButallowsprotecConfor“other”photographsSources:Recital16andArt.6

Page 39: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

European Court of Justice (1)

§  CaseC‑5/08InfopaqInternaLonal[2009](Infopaq)§  CopyrightwithinthemeaningofArCcle2(a)ofDirecCve2001/29isliabletoapply

onlyinrelaContoasubject-ma"erwhichisoriginalinthesensethatitisitsauthor’sownintellectualcreaCon(par.37)

§  Itisonlythroughthechoice,sequenceandcombinaConofthosewordsthattheauthormayexpresshiscreaCvityinanoriginalmannerandachievearesultthatisanintellectualcreaCon.

§  11consecuCvewords(“maynotberuledoutthat…”)

Page 40: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

European Court of Justice (2)

§  CaseC‑393/09BezpečnostnísoQwarováasociace[2010](BSA);§  …thegraphicuserinterfacecan,asawork,beprotectedbycopyrightifitisits

author’sownintellectualcreaCon(part.46)§  WheretheexpressionofthosecomponentsisdictatedbytheirtechnicalfuncCon

thecriterionisnotmet,sincedifferentmethodsofimplemenCnganideaaresolimitedthattheideaandtheexpressionbecomeindissociable(idea-expressionmerger)(par.49).

Page 41: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

European Court of Justice (3)

§  JoinedCasesC‑403/08andC‑429/08FootballAssociaLonPremierLeagueandOthers[2011](FAPL)

§  SporCngeventscannotberegardedasintellectualcreaCons…especiallyfootballmatches,whicharesubjecttorulesofthegame,leavingnoroomforcreaCvefreedom(Par.98)

Page 42: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

European Court of Justice (4)

§  CaseC‑145/10Painer[2011](Painer)§  AnintellectualcreaConisanauthor’sownifitreflectstheauthor’spersonality,

whichisthecaseistheauthorwasabletoexpresshiscreaCveabiliCesintehproducConoftheworkbymakingfreeandcreaCvechoices(par.88)

§  Asregardsportraitphotographs,thephotographercanmakefreeandcreaCvechoicesinseveralmoments:inthepreparaConphease,whentakingthephotographandwhenselecCngthesnapshot

Page 43: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

European Court of Justice (5)

§  CaseC‑604/10FootballDatacovYahoo[2012](FootballDatacovYahoo)§  …thefactthatthesewngupofthedatabaserequired,irrespecCveofthecreaCon

ofthedatawhichitcontains,significantlabourandskillofitsauthor…cannotassuchjusCfytheprotecConofitbycopyright…ifthatlabourandthatskilldonotexpressanyoriginalityintheselecConorarrangementofthatdata

Page 44: February – April 2016 - IP Unitip-unit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seminar-1... · 2016-03-01 · § Case C‑604/10 Football Dataco v Yahoo [2012] (Football Dataco v Yahoo)

OriginalityinEUcopyrightlawAuthor:ThomasMargoni–Lastrevised:18December2014

Copyright © 2014 Thomas Margoni. This case study is licensed under the CreaCve Commons A"ribuCon-NonCommercial-ShareAlike4.0License, thetermsofwhichareavailableath"p://creaCvecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.