final gra 3 9 places of lawful detention
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
1/22
Operational Guidance
Fire and Rescue Authorities
GRA 3.9
Fighting fires in placesof lawful detention
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
2/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9
Fighting fires in placesof lawful detention
November 2013
London: TSO
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
3/22
Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from:
Online
www.tsoshop.co.uk
Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail
TSO
PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN
Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522
Fax orders: 0870 600 5533
E-mail: [email protected]
Textphone: 0870 240 3701
TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents
Published with the permission of the Department for Communities and Local Government on behalf of
Her Majesty’s Stationery office.
© Crown copyright 2013
ISBN 9780117540538
Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design rests with the Crown.
You may re-use this document/publication (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under
the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/
open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey
TW9 4DU; or email: [email protected].
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copy-
right holders concerned.
Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at
Dept for Communities & Local Government
Eland House
Bressenden Place
London
SW1E 5DU.
Printed in the United Kingdom by The Stationery Office
J002819605 C2 11/13 33722
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
4/22
3
The generic risk assessments in this series only apply to England
Contents
SECTION 1
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9Fighting fires in places of lawful detention
Scope 5
Significant hazards and risks 5
Security gates and doors 6
Communication 6
Key control measures 7
Planning 7
Competence and training 8
Proceeding to an incident 9
Command and control 9
Safety Officer(s) 10
Evacuation signal 12
Safety of firefighters 12Personal protective equipment 12
Post incident 13
SECTION 2
Summary of Generic Risk Assessment 3.9Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 15
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
5/22
4
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
6/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 5
SECTION 1
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9Fighting fires in places
of lawful detention
Scope
This generic risk assessment examines the hazards, risks and control measures relating
to fighting fires in places of lawful detention (eg prisons, courts, police cells, and secure
children homes etc).
Activities which involve specific significant hazards, eg responding to an emergency, are
covered in other generic risk assessments.
This, as for all generic risk assessments, provides a starting point for Fire and Rescue
Authorities to conduct their own assessments within the context of local conditions and
existing organisational arrangements.
Significant hazards and risks
The role of the Fire and Rescue Authority is to rescue all persons from an emergency
situation and to extinguish fires within the remit of the legislative requirement.
It is not the role of the Fire and Rescue Authority to assist in the quelling of disturbances,
riots or other similar type of incidents within the confines of places of lawful detention, nor
must Fire and Rescue Authority equipment be used for this purpose, either by fire and
rescue personnel or other on-site staff.
The hazards to fire and rescue personnel relate to:
a) Restricted access
All places of lawful detention have, by design, restricted access and egress. This may
pose a number of difficulties to personnel when attempting to deal with fire and rescue
situations. These include:
• limited choice of approach to the incident, eg it may only be possible to
approach a fire from downwind
• restricted appliance movements and rendezvous points
• difficulty and delay in accessing the scene of operations
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
7/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention6
• difficulty in maintaining a safe access to and egress from the scene of operations
• secure and restricted working environment where large amounts of equipment
may have to be carried to the scene of operations.
b) Behaviour and possible hostilities from Detainees
When dealing with fire incidents within the confines of a prison, or other places of lawfuldetention, the behaviour from detainees can be unpredictable and lead to hostilities
against fire and rescue service personnel. Other types of potential threats from detainees
are:
• further deliberate outbreaks of fire
• ambush and possible hostage taking
• missiles being thrown, eg debris, sharps etc
• verbal threats of violence or intimidation
• physical violence/assault
• dirty protests involving human excrement (biological hazard)
• infection from bodily fluids, needle stick or other sharp injuries.
Security gates and doors
Access to or egress from any part of the premises will be restricted and will require the
assistance and cooperation of authorised on-site staff. Security gates/doors, whether
electronic or manually operated, partition the various parts of the premises to permit the
authorities to isolate areas in situations of unrest or unruly behaviour and to maintain
security and control.
Attention must be drawn to self-locking doors, eg prisons, police stations, court premises,
detention centres etc. DCOL 38/19781 informed Fire and Rescue Authorities of these
doors and identified the concerns posed for personnel safety. The doors are designed to
self-lock on being closed and will require familiarisation training and instruction for
personnel who have places of lawful detention within their area of responsibility –
including ‘cross border’ risks.
Consideration must be made by the Incident Commander of the terminology used by
other agencies to avoid confusion; for example, prison staff refer to floor levels withground floor being referred to as Floor 1.
Roofs, walls and other structures may be fitted with razor wire which is intended to
prevent escape or unauthorised access.
Communication
Due to the construction and layout of places of lawful detention, communication may be
difficult. Fireground communications must be tested for effectiveness as part of any
1 HM Prisons: Self-looking cell doors ‘Dear Chief Executive Letter’ 38/1978 Home Office Guidance 67/1978 issued7 November 1978
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
8/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 7
planning processes and at a fire and rescue incident. Alternative communication methods
may be required and all personnel must be familiar with the evacuation procedure. The
use of available close circuit television must be considered at the outset of operations as it
can provide valuable information in respect of fire location and situation awareness.
Key control measuresPlanning
Planning is the key to enhancing the safety of firefighters and others likely to be affected
by Fire and Rescue Authority operations. Each Fire and Rescue Authority’s integrated risk
management plan will set standards and identify the resources required to ensure safe
systems of work are maintained.
Fire and Rescue Authorities must assess the hazards and risks in their area relating to this
generic risk assessment. The assessment must include other Authority’s areas where
‘cross border’ arrangements make this appropriate.
Site-specific plans must be considered for locations where the hazards and risks are
significant and plans must take into account and specify any variation from the normal
operational capability of personnel, appliances and equipment. In particular, recognition
must be given to the physical and psychological pressures that an operational incident
may apply to fire and rescue personnel.
Site specific plans must include:
• levels of response
• relevant standard operating procedures
• tactical considerations, including rendezvous points, appliance marshaling areas
and access points
• identification and, where necessary, the formal notification to person(s)
responsible for the site of any Fire and Rescue Authority operational limitations.
Planning is underpinned by information gathering, much of which will be gained through
inspections or visits by fire and rescue personnel, for example, those covered by section
7(2)d and 9(3)d of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004.
Information must also be gathered and used to review safe systems of work from sources
both within and outside the Fire and Rescue Authority, including:
• incident de-briefs
• health and safety events
• local authorities
• local resilience forums.
Involving others in planning is an effective way to build good working relations with
partner agencies and other interested parties, such as site owners.
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
9/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention8
Fire and Rescue Authorities must ensure that systems are in place to record and
regularly review risk information and to ensure that new risks are identified and
recorded as soon as practicable.
Fire and Rescue Authorities must ensure that the information gathered is treated as
confidential, unless disclosure is made in the course of duty or is required for legal
reasons.
Fire and Rescue Authorities must consider the benefits of using consistent systems
and formats to record information from all sources. Consideration must also be
given to how timely access will be provided to information to support operational
decision-making.
Information needs will vary in proportion to the size and nature of the incident and
the category of the establishment’s detainees. The capacity of fire and rescue
personnel to assimilate information will vary in relation to the complexity of the
incident. Therefore, arrangements may need to be flexible and be based on more
than one system which may be available, control of the different systems will need
to be scrutinized by the Incident Commander.
Operational risk assessments for places of lawful detention must be as
comprehensive and detailed as possible. As layout will vary significantly from one
establishment to another, it is important and necessary for the details of each
operational plan to be determined by the Fire and Rescue Authority with regards to
local circumstances and after full consultation with the relevant authority.
The operational plan must be evaluated and refined by training and, wherever
possible, joint exercises involving the place of lawful detention and those fire crewsmost likely to attend any fire or other type of incident. It is imperative that Fire and
Rescue Authorities are familiar with the provision of firefighting facilities within the
confines of the establishment, particularly the location of water supplies.
Arrangements must be made with the relevant authority for agreed access to
secure areas in any part of the establishment, including individual cells. Fireground
communications must be tested for effectiveness within the confines the
establishment. Fire and rescue, police and prison personnel or other employees
must be familiar with agreed evacuation signals.
Competence and training
When formulating a competence and training strategy the Fire and Rescue Authority must
consider the following points:
• Ensure specific risk assessments for this incident type are suitable and sufficient
and that those tasked with carrying out the assessment and developing
procedures are competent to do so
• Fire and Rescue Authorities must ensure their personnel are adequately trained
to deal with the hazards and risks associated with operational incidents involving
secure accommodation and places of lawful detention
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
10/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 9
• The level and nature of training undertaken must be shaped by informed training
needs analysis that takes account of Fire and Rescue Authority guidance on the
competency framework, National Occupational Standards and any individual
training needs.
Specific training requirements for incidents involving places of lawful detention will include:
• dissemination of the standard operating procedure and site-specific operational
tactical plans
• site-specific tactical exercises must be undertaken with other agencies or staff
likely to assist at an actual incident.
Training outcomes must be evaluated to ensure that the training provided is effective,
current and meets defined operational needs as determined by the Fire and Rescue
Authority’s integrated risk management plan.
Fire and Rescue Authorities must formulate a regular programme of training sessions and
operational risk assessments. This will permit firefighters to familiarise themselves with fireappliance holding points, vehicular access to and within the grounds of the place of lawful
detention, and to check that there are no obstructions to water supplies for firefighting
purposes.
Firefighters must be familiar with the types of locks found in prisons and other places of
lawful detention. They must know how to operate these locks and how to keep them in
the open or slipped position in order to prevent personnel from being accidentally locked
in cellular accommodation areas during firefighting operations.
It is equally important that firefighters must be familiar with operating the locking
mechanisms whilst wearing full firefighting personal protective equipment, including
gloves.
All fire and rescue personnel must be aware, through familiarisation training, of the
security implications and protocols concerning the issue, use and safe return of keys
within a prison or other place of lawful detention.
Proceeding to an incident
Under normal circumstances appliances responding to incidents in places of lawful
detention will proceed with blue lights and audible warning devices when necessary. On
the approach to a premises, and whilst manoeuvring within the precincts of the
establishment both visual and audible warning devices must be cancelled.
Command and control
The Incident Commander must follow the principles of the current national incident
command system.
Prior to committing personnel into any hazard area, the Incident Commander must take
account of the actual information available regarding the incident at the time. This will
assist them in making effective operational decisions in what are recognised assometimes dangerous, fast moving and emotionally charged environments.
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
11/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention10
A thorough safety brief prior to deployment of all personnel who are required to be within
the hazard zone must be carried out. Crews must be reminded of their role and any
particular risks to their safety, eg violence, missiles etc.
All personnel must be briefed on detainee profiles, specific risks of violence, the locations
of vulnerable detainees, risk of infection from dirty protests, bodily fluids etc and
contingency plans, including areas for safe evacuation and decontamination.
Communication of new or changed risks must continue throughout the incident.
Utilising an inter-agency liaison officer and other sources of intelligence can assist the
Incident Commander by advising on multi-agency tactics, designated safe routes,
prioritisation of incidents etc.
It is essential that the Incident Commander maintain close liaison with the designated
senior officer of the on-site authority throughout the time of Fire Authority involvement.
Appliances and equipment must be kept at a safe distance and in a secure area so as notto fall under the control of detainees. A ‘safe distance’ will depend upon the
circumstances and must be decided after discussion with the relevant authority.
To ensure that all personnel are kept fully acquainted and briefed of all developments and
to avoid any delays in response, a forward control point must be established as fireground
control and will be responsible for co-ordinating all fire and rescue activities at the incident
scene.
A rendezvous point/marshalling point for appliances must be agreed between the Fire
and Rescue Authority and on-site authority.
As an integral part of operations all appliances and crews must establish and maintain
radio contact with fireground control.
In the case of a fire in a prison, a senior Fire Authority officer must assume the role of ‘fire
liaison officer’ and proceed to the prison incident command room where they will be part
of the corporate incident command team. This will ensure full liaison and discussion
between the Police Service and the on-site authority regarding the Fire Authority’s role.
Fire and rescue personnel must be aware that in a prison establishment, the person in
charge of the establishment will assume the role of Prison Service Incident Commander
and will remain in overall control throughout the duration of the incident. The fire liaison
officer will act as the link between the Prison Service Incident Commander and the Fire
and Rescue Authority Incident Commander, who will remain in charge of all aspects of fire
and rescue operations.
Local liaison must ensure that sufficient on-site staff are available to protect and guide fire
crews, therefore, if necessary, they can unlock gates/doors and provide information
regarding cell layout etc. Fire and rescue personnel must never work unaccompanied in a
secure environment unless concerns for the safety of on-site staff are put at risk (eg
smoke-logged areas or where other respiratory concerns are identified).
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
12/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 11
Fire and Rescue Authority equipment must not be loaned to other personnel for any
purpose.
Fire crews must not be permitted to enter and operate in situations where there is an
unacceptable risk of physical abuse by detainees. Fire Authority Incident Commanders
must ensure that areas, which fire crews, are required enter, have previously been
secured by the onsite authority or by the police.
Safety Officer(s)
The early appointment of one or more Safety Off icer(s) will assist in supporting a tactical
plan to address risks so they can be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level.
Those undertaking the Safety Off icer role must:
• be competent to perform the role
• ensure personnel are wearing appropriate personal protective equipment
• monitor the physical condition of personnel and/or general or specific safety
conditions at the incident, in accordance with their brief
• take any urgent corrective action required to ensure safety of personnel
• update the Incident Commander or senior safety officer regarding any change in
circumstances
• not be engaged in any other aspect of operations, unless this is required to deal
with a risk critical situation.
Safety Officers must be adequately briefed regarding the nature of the incident prior to
undertaking the task and have clear guidance as to their allocated task and the current
prevailing hazards and risks. The Incident Commander must confirm that the Safety
Officer understands:
• their role and area of responsibility
• allocated tasks
• lines of communication
• evacuation procedures.
The activities of a Safety Officer can be carried out by any of the Fire and Rescue Authority roles, but the complexity of the task, size of the incident and scope of
responsibility must be considered by the Incident Commander when determining the
supervisory level required.
Safety Officers must wear nationally recognised identification to indicate they are
undertaking the Safety Officer role.
Fire and Rescue Authorities must ensure that training and other measures (such as
aide-memoires) are in place and available to support those staff liable to undertake this
role.
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
13/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention12
Evacuation signal
Fire and Rescue Authorities and the Prison Service use ACME Thunder Whistles. In the
case of Fire and Rescue Authorities, short blasts on the whistle indicate that the area
must be evacuated. However, in the case of the Prison Service, this would indicate
aprison employee required assistance.
To avoid confusion between the signals, Fire and Rescue Authorities must liaise locally
with the prison authority to discuss and identify an alternative assistance signal for prison
staff during incidents where the Fire Authority is involved. This must be agreed during joint
training exercises; familiarisation visits etc and written into local procedures for dealing
with incidents within places of lawful detention.
Safety of firefighters
The safety of firefighters must be considered a major priority at any incident in a place of
lawful detention. Fire and rescue Incident Commanders must not hesitate to withdraw
crews if their personal safety is put at risk.
Fire crews must be briefed in the method of unlocking secure doors/gates. On no
account must doors or gates be locked behind fire crews during an operational incident
unless this is to secure safety. Secure and safe egress must be maintained at all times
during the operational activity.
Under no circumstances must fire and rescue personnel be left to work alone in places of
lawful detention. Firefighters must work in teams of a minimum of two, preferably
accompanied by a designated member of on-site staff.
Consideration must be given to crews reporting back to the Incident Commander or entrycontrol officer at a greater frequency than is standard if issues dictate greater
communication levels are required.
When searching or firefighting in a cell, one member of the crew must remain at the cell
door to prevent it from closing. Failure to do so could result in a crew member being
trapped inside should the door be closed inadvertently by other crews or deliberately by a
detainee.
Personal protective equipment
Fire and Rescue Authorities must ensure that any personal protective equipment providedis fit for purpose and meets all required safety standards. When choosing suitable
protective garments, the standard of clothing worn beneath the specialist personal
protective equipment must also be taken into account. Consideration must also be given
to the selection of suitable sizes and gender specific requirements.
All personnel must use appropriate levels of service provided personal protective
equipment and respiratory protection equipment as determined by the safe system of
work.
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
14/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 13
Post incident
The following measures must be considered to help eliminate or remove risks after an
incident, as appropriate to the nature and scale of the incident:
• Any safety events; personal injuries, exposure to hazardous substances
or near-misses must be recorded, investigated and reported in line with
legislative requirements such as Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous
Occurrences Regulations 1995, etc
• Arrangements must be in place to either remove all contamination from personal
protective equipment or to ensure it’s safe and appropriate disposal and to
check that the equipment maintains the agreed levels of integrity and protection
for the wearer throughout its lifecycle
• As appropriate, occupational health support and surveillance follow-up
• Conduct de-briefing to identify and record any ‘lessons learned’ from the
incident. De-briefs will range in complexity and formality proportionate to thescale of the incident and inline with individual Fire and Rescue Authority’s
procedures
• Consider any changes required to safe systems of work, appliances or
equipment in the light of any lessons learned from de-briefs or from safety events
• Consider the need to review existing information held on a premises or location,
or the need to add a new premises or location into future planning eg by adding
to a visit or inspection programme
• Consider the need to refer to other agencies any concerns or issues that are
identified at an incident. When sharing information, due regard must be paid
to the need for confidentiality and the legal requirements arising from the Data
Protection Act
• Staff must be supported and monitored to identify whether they are experiencing
any adverse effects and to check whether they would benefit from accessing
counselling and support services
• Consideration must be given to arranging for staff to make a contemporaneous
written record of their actions. This information may be used to assist in any
internal or external investigations or enquiries that follow any incident, eg the
Coroner’s Court, police / public enquiry, etc.
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
15/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention14
Technical references
1 ‘Dear Chief Officer letter’, 7/1991 – D Fire Standards in prison establishments: principles
of design and standards of construction (the design guide) : Fire Precautions Manual for
Prisons
2 HM Prisons: Self-locking cell doors ‘Dear Chief Officer Letter’ 38/1978 and Home Office
guidance 67/1978 issued on the 7 November 1978
3 ‘Dear Chief Officer Letter’ 5/1988 – E Fires in prison establishments, Home Office, 5 August1988 and ‘Dear Firemaster Letter’ 7/1992 – L
Home Office Technical Bulletin 1/1997
4 Decontamination procedures as identified in Manual of Firemanship book, 12, Part 2 and
the protection against blood-borne infections in the workplace: HIV and Hepatitis, Advisory
Committee on Dangerous Pathogens reports, HMSO, Crown copyright 1996. Third
impression 1996
5 Integrated Personal Development System (IPDS) and Emergency Fire Service Role Maps
6 Building Disaster Assessment Group – Key research Findings Circular 55/2004
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
7 Prison Act 1952 – Lawful Detention
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
16/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 15
S E
C T I O N
2
S u
m m a r y o f G e n e r i c
R i s k A s s e s s m e n t
3 . 9
F i g
h t i n g f i r e s i n p l a c e s o f l a w f u l d e t e n t i o n
T a s k – P r e - i n c i d e n t
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
1
A c c e s s i n g p r e m i s e s
L
i m i t e d c h o i c e o f
a
p p r o a c h
R
e s t r i c t e d a c c e s s
N o t a c h i e
v i n g
s u c c e s s f u l o u t c o m e
D e l a y i n a
p p l y i n g
fi r e fi g h t i n g a n d r e s c u e
t e c h n i q u e
s
D e t a i n e e s
E m p l o y e e s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
P r e v e n t i o n
•
E n g a g i n g i n p l a n n i n g m e e t i n g s w i t h
o r g a n i s e r s a n d o t h e r e m e r g e n c y
r e s p o n d e r s
•
F i r e s a f e t y c h e c k s a n d a d v i c e
•
F i r e r e s p o n s e c o v e r a v a i l a b l e a t t h e
e v e n t o r n e a r b y , w
h e r e r e q u i r e d
O r g a n i s a t i o n a l r i s k c o n t r o l
•
P r o d u c e a s t a n d a
r d o p e r a t i n g
p r o c e d u r e f o r f i r e s i n p l a c e s o f
l a w f u l d e t e n t i o n
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
17/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention16
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
1 c
o n t .
•
I d e n t i f y a n d a d d r e s s t r a i n i n g n e e d s
a n d c o m p e t e n c y
r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r
f i g h t i n g f i r e s a t p l a c e s o f l a w f u l
d e t e n t i o n I n c i d e n t C o m m a n d e r s t o
b e c o m p e t e n t a t g a t h e r i n g r e l e v a n t
i n f o r m a t i o n , p r o c e s s i n g i n f o r m a t i o n
a n d m a k i n g d e c i s
i o n s a b o u t r i s k .
T h i s a l s o a p p l i e s t o f i r e f i g h t e r s i n
t h e r i s k a r e a
•
S i t u a t i o n a l a w a r e n e s s .
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
18/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 17
T a s k – I n i t i a l s t a g e s o f t h e
i n c i d e n t
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
2
P o s i t i o n i n g a p p l i a n c e s ,
d i s e m b a r k i n g t o
a p p r o a c h t h e i n c i d e n t
M
i s s i l e s b e i n g t h r o w n a t
c
r e w s a n d / o r v e h i c l e s
M
a n u a l h a n d l i n g o f
e
q u i p m e n t
I n j u r i e s t o
e m p l o y e e s
a n d o t h e r s
E m p l o y e e s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
P l a n n i n g
L i a i s o n w i t h a u t h o r i t y
F u l l p e r s o n a l p r o t e c t i v e e q
u i p m e n t
M a n u a l h a n d l i n g t r a i n i n g
S a f e d i s t a n c e
W i t h d r a w c r e w s
I n f o r m a t i o n ,
i n s t r u c t i o n a n
d t r a i n i n g o n
h a z a r d s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p
l a c e s o f l a w f u l
d e t e n t i o n .
3
F i r e fi g h t i n g i n p l a c e s o f
l a w f u l d e t e n t i o n
F
i r e , e x p l o s i o n
V
e r b a l a b u s e
S
h a r p o b j e c t s
I n j u r i e s t o
e m p l o y e e s
a n d o t h e r s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
E m p l o y e e s
P l a n n i n g
F u l l p e r s o n a l p r o t e c t i v e e q
u i p m e n t
O n - s i t e e m p l o y e e e s c o r t a t a l l t i m e s a p a r t
f r o m b r e a t h i n g a p p a r a t u s
o p e r a t i o n s
A l l p e r s o n n e l u n d e r f u l l s u p e r v i s i o n
I n f o r m a t i o n ,
i n s t r u c t i o n a n
d t r a i n i n g o n
h a z a r d s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p
l a c e s o f l a w f u l
d e t e n t i o n .
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
19/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention18
T a s k – A s t h e i n c i d e n t d e
v e l o p s
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
3 c
o n t .
F i r e fi g h t i n g i n p l a c e s o f
l a w f u l d e t e n t i o n
S
l i p s a n d t r i p s
A
r d u o u s w o r k
D
e h y d r a t i o n
S
e l f - l o c k i n g d o o r s
P
h y s i c a l b a r r i e r s o r
b
l o c k a d e s
L
e v e l o f s e c u r i t y
L
o s s o f e x t i n g u i s h i n g
m
e d i a
I n j u r i e s t o
e m p l o y e e s
a n d o t h e r s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
L o c a l s e c u r i t y i n t e l l i g e n c e
S i t u a t i o n a l a w a r e n e s s
S u f fi c i e n t p e r s o n n e l a n d r e s o u r c e s a v a i l a b l e
C o n t i n u o u s r a d i o c o n t a c t
b e t w e e n c r e w s a n d
w i t h I n c i d e n t C o m m a n d e r
C o n t i n u o u s l i a i s o n w i t h r e l e v a n t a u t h o r i t y
d u r i n g i n c i d e n t
W i t h d r a w c r e w s
C r e w s w o r k i n m i n i m u m o
f t e a m s o f t w o
S e c u r e r o u t e .
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
20/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention 19
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
3 c
o n t .
F i g h t i n g fi r e s i n p l a c e s
o f l a w f u l d e t e n t i o n
T o x i c o r b i o l o g i c a l
h
a z a r d s
I n
f e c t i o u s d i s e a s e s
H
y p o d e r m i c n e e d l e s
P
h y s i c a l a s s a u l t
I n j u r i e s t o
e m p l o y e e s
a n d o t h e r s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
V a c c i n a t i o n p o l i c y , h e p a t i t
i s B ,
t e t a n u s e t c
P l a n n i n g
F u l l p e r s o n a l p r o t e c t i v e e q
u i p m e n t
P r i s o n / o t h e r e m p l o y e e e s
c o r t a t a l l t i m e s
a p a r t f r o m d u r i n g b r e a t h i n
g a p p a r a t u s
o p e r a t i o n s
A l l p e r s o n n e l u n d e r f u l l s u p e r v i s i o n
I n f o r m a t i o n ,
i n s t r u c t i o n a n
d t r a i n i n g o n
h a z a r d s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p
l a c e s o f l a w f u l
d e t e n t i o n
S e c u r e r o u t e
B r e a t h i n g a p p a r a t u s i f r i s k
s o f a i r b o r n e
b i o l o g i c a l h a z a r d s a r e s u s
p e c t e d o r p r e s e n t
M a i n t e n a n c e o f s e c u r e a c
c e s s a n d e g r e s s .
D
e t a i n e e s w h o d o n o t
h
a v e E n g l i s h a s a fi r s t
l a
n g u a g e
I n j u r i e s t o
d e t a i n e e s
f r o m n o t u n d e r s t a n d i n g
i n s t r u c t i o n s g i v e n i n
E n g l i s h
D e t a i n e e s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
U s e o f p r o m p t c a r d s f o r v a r i o u s l a n g u a g e s
I n t e r p r e t e r i f a v a i l a b l e
U s e o f l o c a l r e s o u r c e s i f p
o s s i b l e .
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
21/22
Generic Risk Assessment 3.9 – Fighting fires in places of lawful detention20
T a s k – P o s t I n c i d e n t
R e
f .
N o
.
A c t i v i t y
H
a z a r d
R i s k
P e r s o n s a t r i s
k
C o n t r o l m e a s u r e s
4
E m e r g e n c y e v a c u a t i o n
C
o n f u s i o n w i t h p r i s o n
a
s s i s t a n c e s i g n a l s
R i s k o f i n j u r y t o fi r e
fi g h t i n g p e r s o n n e l a n d
o t h e r s
E m p l o y e e s
F i r e a n d r e s c u e
p e r s o n n e l
C o n t i n u o u s r a d i o c o n t a c t
b e t w e e n c r e w s a n d
w i t h F i r e A u t h o r i t y I n c i d e n t C o m m a n d e r
O t h e r l o c a l l y a g r e e d p r o c e
d u r e s w i t h t h e
a u t h o r i t y .
-
8/17/2019 FINAL GRA 3 9 Places of Lawful Detention
22/22