focused reading instruction and student achievement presentation at cec conference boston – april...

14
Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD [email protected] Taryn Goodwin MEd [email protected] Allison Moriarty MEd [email protected] Lauren Martina MEd [email protected] Molly-Armine Manwaring [email protected] James Madison University Harrisonburg, VA 22807

Post on 21-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement

Presentation at CEC ConferenceBoston – April 5, 2008

Dr. Richard Evans, PhD [email protected] Goodwin MEd [email protected] Allison Moriarty MEd [email protected] Lauren Martina MEd [email protected] Molly-Armine Manwaring [email protected]

James Madison University Harrisonburg, VA 22807

Page 2: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

The study

• Evaluated the effectiveness of intensive remedial reading tutoring for students with disabilities or high-risk of reading failure in a rural area of Virginia. The study explored focused reading skills instruction on struggling readers to identify instructional practices that might be used in a Response to Instruction (RtI) school model for elementary students with and without emotional and behavioral disorders.

Page 3: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Exploring outcomes of focused reading instruction

• Pilot study for potential RtI strategy

• subjects (individuals) in third and fourth grade in a rural elementary school

• Outcomes based on student achievement in reading

• Outcomes based on change between pre-test and post-test data

Page 4: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Changing the Way We Educate Struggling Students

• Catch them before they fall (fail) • The majority of sped students have reading

problems• Reading is a basic building block of education • Research suggests all but a few children can be

taught reading • Early intervention catalyst for change • NCLB Act stresses funding of successful public

education instead of continuing to fund a failing system

Page 5: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Research Supports• To be good readers, children must possess:

– Phonemic awareness -Chard & Dickson, 1999

– Phonics skills - National Reading Panel, 2000; Vaughn et al., 1998

– Fluency - Chard & Dickson, 1999; National Reading Panel, 2000

– Comprehension - Chard & Dickson, 1999; National Reading Panel, 2000; Vaughn et al., 1998

– Vocabulary - Kueker, 1990; Nagy, 1988; Nagy et al., 1985

• Explicit instruction in decoding with practice on stories that “fit” a child’s reading level as the most effective way to teach all students to read

Page 6: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Professional Training is Part of the JMU SPED M.Ed. Program

Instruction is an essential components of effective reading instruction• Phonological awareness

– Word study / word analysis– Letter-sound correspondence

• Phonics• Fluency

– Reading speed– Prosody

• Comprehension• Vocabulary• Establish Progress Monitoring

– In-class training• Modeling

– Modeling of specific components of reading program

Page 7: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Study • Individualized sessions (10-16) with students with

reading difficulty (n=8) – Referred by teacher

– Discussion with teacher about students Progress / Problems

– IEP and work sample review when available

• Control group of students with reading difficulty (n=8) – Referred by teacher

• Focused systematic reading instruction based on – Informal assessments

– IEP goals

– Teacher recommendation

Page 8: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Student Characteristics• Gender

– 5 males experimental group and 3 males in the control group

– 4 females experimental group and 4 in the control group

• Ages 8 to 10

• Grades 3 to 4

• All students were eligible for special education services

• Exhibited a variety of reading difficulties

Page 9: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Student Outcomes

• Student academic outcomes were evaluated with four informal reading measures

• Phonological awareness – Quick Screener

• Phonics - Quick Screener

• Fluency – Timed Readings• Comprehension – Commercial Screeners

(QRI)

Page 10: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Rhyme:

Sentence Segmentation:

Blending:

Addition/Substation:

Deletion:

Phoneme Isolation:

Syllable Segmentation

Activity 1: Name/sound

Activity 2A: CVC

Activity 2B: Context

Activity 3A: CVCC & CCVC

Activity 3B: Context

Activity 4A: Silent E

Activity 4B: Context

Activity 5A: R-Control

Activity 5B: Context

Activity 6A: th, ing, sh, wh, ch, igh, ck, kn, wr, nk

Activity 6B: th-, ing, sh, wh, ch, igh, ck, kn, wr, nk

Activity 7A: oa, ea, oo, ee, ai, ol, ay, ou, oi, oy, au, aw, oe, ew, ow

Activity 8A: dis-, non-, in-, re-, -tion, -ous, -ness, -ion, -able, -est, -le, -ful, -ic, be-, de-

Activity 9A: 2-Syllable

Activity 9B: 3-Syllable

Activity 9C: 3-Syllable

PA

Phonics

Skill Areas for Focused Instruction

Page 11: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Comparisons of Groups Initial Averages

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

Rhyme:

Blendin

g:

Deletio

n:

Syllab

le S

egm

enta

tion

Activit

y 2A:

Activit

y 3A:

Activit

y 4A:

Activit

y 5A:

Activit

y 6A:

Activit

y 7A:

Activit

y 8A:

Activit

y 9B:

Skills

Sco

re

Control average Exp Average Mean line

PA Phonics

Page 12: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Net Change of Groups Comparisons

-0.30

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

Rhym

e:

Blend

ing:

Delet

ion:

Syllab

le S

egm

enta

tion

Activi

ty 2

A:

Activi

ty 3

A:

Activi

ty 4

A:

Activi

ty 5

A:

Activi

ty 6

A:

Activi

ty 7

A:

Activi

ty 8

A:

Activi

ty 9

B:

Skills

Sco

re

Net change CONTROL Net change EXP Net Change B/EXP

PA Phonics

Page 13: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Net Change Fluency

Average Net Change EXP CONTROL

Fluency: Accuracy 17% 3%

Words Per Minute (WPM): 17.4 -5.37

Comprehension: 5% 1%

Page 14: Focused Reading Instruction and Student Achievement Presentation at CEC Conference Boston – April 5, 2008 Dr. Richard Evans, PhD evansra@jmu.edu evansra@jmu.edu

Variable Posttest average

Per-test average m1-m2= SD

d = (effect size)

Rhyme: 0.933 0.933 0.000 0.103 0.000

Sentence Segmentation: 0.933 0.900 0.033 0.110 0.304

Blending: 1.008 0.900 0.108 0.110 0.989

Addition/Substation: 0.833 0.767 0.067 0.197 0.339

Deletion: 0.833 0.817 0.017 0.223 0.075

Phoneme Isolation: 0.967 0.900 0.067 0.110 0.609

Syllable Segmentation 0.733 0.367 0.367 0.266 1.379

Activity 1: Name/sound 0.974 0.923 0.051 0.044 1.169

Activity 2A:CVC 0.933 0.950 -0.017 0.055 -0.304

Activity 2B: Context 0.975 0.902 0.073 0.111 0.658

Activity 3A: CVCC & CCVC 0.883 0.700 0.183 0.141 1.296

Activity 3B: Context 0.983 0.917 0.067 0.117 0.570

Activity 4A: Silent E 0.877 0.617 0.260 0.204 1.274

Activity 4B: Context 0.867 0.800 0.067 0.141 0.471

Activity 5A: R-Control 0.950 0.767 0.183 0.186 0.985

Activity 5B: Context 0.900 0.817 0.083 0.172 0.484

Activity 6A: th, ing, sh, wh, ch, igh, ck, kn, wr, nk 0.858 0.550 0.308 0.327 0.943

Activity 6B: th-, ing, sh, wh, ch, igh, ck, kn, wr, nk 0.800 0.617 0.183 0.313 0.587

Activity 7A: oa, ea, oo, ee, ai, ol, ay, ou, oi, oy, au, aw, oe, ew, ow 0.722 0.594 0.128 0.310 0.412

Activity 8A: dis-, non-, in-, re-, -tion, -ous, -ness, -ion, -able, -est, -le, -ful, -ic, be-, de- 0.417 0.400 0.017 0.318 0.052

Activity 9A: 2-Syllable 0.417 0.233 0.183 0.367 0.500

Activity 9B: 3-Syllable 0.383 0.100 0.283 0.245 1.157

Activity 9C: 3-Syllable 0.317 0.083 0.233 0.204 1.143

Accuracy 0.937 0.916 0.021 0.074 0.289

wpm 72.952 51.738 21.213 24.742 0.857

Comprehension 0.933 0.800 0.133 0.179 0.745