fundamental causes of the civil war
DESCRIPTION
Fundamental Causes of the Civil War. 4.1 Notes. NORTH Industrial Factories Manufacturing Big cities / urban Anti-slavery High population. SOUTH Agricultural Plantations / Farms Small cities / rural Pro-slavery King Cotton = southern wealth Less populous. Economical Key Differences. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Fundamental CausesFundamental Causesof theof theCivil WarCivil War
4.1 Notes4.1 Notes
Economical Key Economical Key DifferencesDifferences
NORTHNORTH
IndustrialIndustrial
FactoriesFactories
ManufacturingManufacturing
Big cities / urbanBig cities / urban
Anti-slaveryAnti-slavery
High populationHigh population
SOUTHSOUTH
AgriculturalAgricultural
Plantations / FarmsPlantations / Farms
Small cities / ruralSmall cities / rural
Pro-slaveryPro-slavery
King Cotton = King Cotton = southern wealthsouthern wealth
Less populousLess populous
Political CausesPolitical Causes Missouri CompromiseMissouri Compromise
– Maintained balance of free/slave statesMaintained balance of free/slave states– 1818: Missouri requests statehood1818: Missouri requests statehood– N. and S. debate issue of Slavery in MON. and S. debate issue of Slavery in MO– Congress passes compromiseCongress passes compromise
Maine admitted as free stateMaine admitted as free state Missouri admitted as slave stateMissouri admitted as slave state Louisiana Territory split in two parts – Louisiana Territory split in two parts –
divided at 36/30 N. latitudedivided at 36/30 N. latitude South of line, slavery is legalSouth of line, slavery is legal North of line, (except MO) is illegalNorth of line, (except MO) is illegal
Statehood for Statehood for California - 1850California - 1850– CA constitution CA constitution
forbade slaveryforbade slavery– Alarmed/angered S.Alarmed/angered S.– Assumed CA would Assumed CA would
be slave state be slave state because mostly because mostly below compromise below compromise lineline
• Wanted compromise to apply to territories west of Louisiana Purchase to ensure more slave states• Threats of secession at Congressional debates
- formal withdrawal of a state from the union
Compromise of 1850Compromise of 1850 CA admitted as free CA admitted as free
statestate Popular sovereignty for Popular sovereignty for
residents of New residents of New Mexico and Utah Mexico and Utah territoriesterritories– Right to vote for/against Right to vote for/against
slaveryslavery Harsher fugitive slave Harsher fugitive slave
lawslaws– Slaves not entitled to Slaves not entitled to
trial by jurytrial by jury– Fines and imprisonment Fines and imprisonment
for those aiding fugitivesfor those aiding fugitives
Kansas – Nebraska Kansas – Nebraska ActAct
Sen. Stephen Douglas wanted popular Sen. Stephen Douglas wanted popular sovereignty for KS and NE territoriessovereignty for KS and NE territories
Problem = territories north of compromise Problem = territories north of compromise lineline
Legally closed to slaveryLegally closed to slavery Bill introduced to divide territoryBill introduced to divide territory
– NE in northNE in north– KS in southKS in south
Became law in 1854Became law in 1854 Repealed MO Repealed MO
CompromiseCompromise
““Bleeding Bleeding Kansas”Kansas”
Race for KansasRace for Kansas Attempts to populate Attempts to populate Kansas to win voteKansas to win vote 1855 vote1855 vote 1,000s of “border ruffians” crossed 1,000s of “border ruffians” crossed
from MO to KS to vote illegallyfrom MO to KS to vote illegally Gov’t set up at Lecompton - pro-Gov’t set up at Lecompton - pro-
slavery acts passedslavery acts passed Abolitionists set up rival gov’t in Abolitionists set up rival gov’t in
TopekaTopeka Led to bloody violenceLed to bloody violence
New Republican PartyNew Republican Party Opponents of slavery Opponents of slavery
in territoriesin territories United in opposition United in opposition
of Kansas-Nebraska of Kansas-Nebraska ActAct
Nominated John C. Nominated John C. Fremont as candidateFremont as candidate
Fremont win could Fremont win could have caused have caused immediate Southern immediate Southern secessionsecession
Dem. James Buchanan Dem. James Buchanan won insteadwon instead
Dred Scott DecisionDred Scott Decision
Owner took him from Owner took him from MO to free territory in MO to free territory in IL and WI then backIL and WI then back
Appealed for freedomAppealed for freedom Supreme Court ruled Supreme Court ruled
against Scottagainst Scott He was not a citizen He was not a citizen 55thth Amendment Amendment
protected “property”protected “property”
Abraham Abraham Lincoln Lincoln ElectedElected
1860 Republican 1860 Republican presidential candidatepresidential candidate
Appeared moderate in Appeared moderate in viewsviews
Pledged to halt further Pledged to halt further spread of slaveryspread of slavery
Promised not to Promised not to interfere with existing interfere with existing slaveryslavery
Southerners still viewed Southerners still viewed him as enemyhim as enemy
Democratic party split Democratic party split over slavery issuesover slavery issues– Divided Southern Divided Southern
votesvotes Lincoln victoriousLincoln victorious
Southern Southern SecessionSecession
Struggle over slavery viewed as conflictStruggle over slavery viewed as conflict– States’ right to self-determination VS. Federal States’ right to self-determination VS. Federal
gov’t controlgov’t control Felt Political voice in national gov’t was lostFelt Political voice in national gov’t was lost S.C. seceded – Dec. 20, 1860S.C. seceded – Dec. 20, 1860 MS, AL, GA, LA, TX, FL, VA, NC, TN, AR MS, AL, GA, LA, TX, FL, VA, NC, TN, AR
followedfollowed Confederate States of America formedConfederate States of America formed Constitution written- “protected and Constitution written- “protected and
recognized” slaveryrecognized” slavery Jefferson Davis of MS elected presidentJefferson Davis of MS elected president
Key Key Question…Question…
Would the North allow the South to Would the North allow the South to leave the Union without a fight?leave the Union without a fight?