geometalurgia bhp

15
MINERA ESCONDIDA Gerencia de Servicios metalurgicos Mine Plant Integral Planning and Precrushing

Upload: marcelo-mamani

Post on 16-May-2017

251 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geometalurgia Bhp

MINERA ESCONDIDA Gerencia de Servicios metalurgicos

Mine Plant Integral Planning and Precrushing

Page 2: Geometalurgia Bhp

Modelos Predictivos de Velocidad de Sedimentación y % Humedad Residual,

para las Plantas (LS – LC) yTranque de Relave FY04-FY05-08

Page 3: Geometalurgia Bhp

N-12Bco 3055

N-11Bco 2920

Mirada al Noroeste

Proyecto considera 1200 muestras de las cuales hemos analizado 500 aproximadamente

Page 4: Geometalurgia Bhp

Figura: Vista 3D de la Velocidad de sedimentación para losbancos 2920 y 2650 en el sector de las expansiones N11 y N12

Page 5: Geometalurgia Bhp

Figura: Vista 3D de los volúmenes con bajo porcentaje de humedad residual.

Page 6: Geometalurgia Bhp

Semana kTon CUT FE BWI Total Kton KTon. Baja VS KTon. Buena VS Período Ley de Corte % Baja VS % Buena VSEne04_S1 2,205,158 1.71 2.02 12.6 2,205,158 977,110 1,228,048 1 al 12 Enero 0.59 44.3% 55.7%Ene04_S2 1,265,308 1.77 1.86 12.7 1,265,308 662,989 602,319 13 al 19 Enero 0.61 52.4% 47.6%Ene04_S3 1,258,655 1.64 1.84 12.8 1,258,655 588,911 669,744 20 al 26 Enero 0.65 46.8% 53.2%Ene04_S4 786,779 1.46 1.67 13.2 786,779 467,006 319,773 27 al 31 Enero 0.63 59.4% 40.6%Feb04_S1 2,331,833 1.40 1.76 13.8 2,331,833 986,812 1,345,021 1 al 9 Febrero 0.50 42.3% 57.7%Feb04_S2 1,619,019 1.72 1.89 13.2 1,619,019 896,194 722,825 10 al 16 Febrero 0.77 55.4% 44.6%Feb04_S3 1,574,138 2.03 1.85 13.2 1,574,138 388,565 1,185,573 17 al 23 Febrero 0.69 24.7% 75.3%Feb04_S4 1,161,165 1.61 2.03 13.9 1,161,165 122,133 1,039,032 24 al 29 Febrero 0.68 10.5% 89.5%Mar04_S1 2,789,017 1.52 2.06 12.5 2,789,017 859,684 1,929,333 1 al 8 Marzo 0.75 30.8% 69.2%Mar04_S2 1,759,993 1.82 1.84 14.1 1,759,993 308,294 1,451,699 9 al 15 Marzo 0.96 17.5% 82.5%Mar04_S3 1,348,367 1.89 2.08 13.3 1,348,367 338,173 1,010,194 16 al 22 Marzo 0.74 25.1% 74.9%Mar04_S4 1,850,149 1.93 1.88 13.9 1,850,149 366,861 1,483,288 23 al 31 Marzo 0.84 19.8% 80.2%Abril 2004 7,549,048 1.55 2.15 13.5 7,549,048 1,693,348 5,855,700 1 al 30 abril 0.60 22.4% 77.6%Mayo 2004 6,210,022 1.89 1.88 14.0 6,210,022 1,238,726 4,971,296 1 al 31 Mayo 0.83 19.9% 80.1%Junio 2004 5,457,959 1.89 1.97 14.3 5,457,959 703,609 4,754,350 1 al 30 Junio 0.70 12.9% 87.1%

Total 39,166,610 1.73 1.96 13.6 39,166,610 10,598,415 28,568,195 27.1% 72.9%

Tabla: Resumen alimentación FY04, para la velocidad de alimentación

Page 7: Geometalurgia Bhp

Semana Ton Ton. %HR < 30 Ton. %HR > 30 % (%HR < 30) % (%HR > 30)Ene04_S1 2,205,158 814,659 1,390,499 36.9% 63.1%Ene04_S2 1,265,308 463,602 801,706 36.6% 63.4%Ene04_S3 1,258,655 476,958 781,698 37.9% 62.1%Ene04_S4 786,779 266,173 520,606 33.8% 66.2%Sub-Total 5,515,900 2,021,392 3,494,509 36.3% 63.7%

Feb04_S1 2,331,833 612,824 1,719,010 26.3% 73.7%Feb04_S2 1,619,019 328,907 1,290,112 20.3% 79.7%Feb04_S3 1,574,138 320,825 1,253,313 20.4% 79.6%Feb04_S4 1,161,165 144,907 1,016,258 12.5% 87.5%Sub-Total 6,686,155 1,407,463 5,278,693 19.9% 80.1%

Mar04_S1 2,789,017 288,132 2,500,885 10.3% 89.7%Mar04_S2 1,759,993 244,462 1,515,530 13.9% 86.1%Mar04_S3 1,348,367 341,810 1,006,557 25.3% 74.7%Mar04_S4 1,850,149 159,049 1,691,100 8.6% 91.4%Sub-Total 7,747,526 1,033,453 6,714,072 14.5% 85.5%

Abril 2004 7,549,048 1,041,098 6,507,949 13.8% 86.2%

Mayo 2004 6,210,022 415,482 5,794,541 6.7% 93.3%

Junio 2004 6,180,910 949,826 5,231,085 15.4% 84.6%Total 39,889,561 6,868,714 33,020,849 17.22% 82.78%

Nota: HR es la humedad residual

Tabla: Resumen alimentación FY04 para la Humedad Residual.

Page 8: Geometalurgia Bhp

BHP BILLITONMINERA ESCONDIDA LIMITADA

GEOMETALLURGY

Page 9: Geometalurgia Bhp

Geomet Long Term Models NOV03Revisiting same data & using plant results

• Recovery Flotation model developed with especial efffort to improve empirical factors and real differences between Los Colorados and Laguna Seca as feedback to the models.

• Copper Concentrate Grade Addition of new drillhole data

• Updated congrade calculation equations from mineralogy. Used same congrade model for both plants adding 1% to LC (empirical)

• Hardness model with same data and improved definition of drivers and domains using UCS-PLT

ESCONDIDA

• TPH models using new plant data, particularly %+100#, limiting SPI values and recalculated TPH. Recalculated plant Tph values is unique valid approach (filter plant limitations prior to comparison against forecast)

• MEL TPH model incorporates SPI as upper limit for TPH capping based upon real plant events.

• CEET TPH for FY05 and 5Yr planning. Updating with new samples in march 04

Page 10: Geometalurgia Bhp

GEOMET ESCONDIDA THROUGHPUT

•MEL TPH model completed as required for use in FY05 Budget.

•Use of andesite and porphyry in estimation of F80

• Use of BWi in estimation of P80 instead of fixed values (as in Oct02) with capping at 230 µ for Los Colorados and 215 µ for Laguna Seca

•Maximum Tph fixed at 6000 for Los Colorados and 5500 for Laguna Seca

•Use of Spi for the 1st time as a capping value for Tph from real plant events information

Spi Tph LC Tph LS70 – 80 4,168 4,00080 – 90 3,889 3,800>= 90 3,600 3,500

Page 11: Geometalurgia Bhp

GEOMET ESCONDIDA THROUGHPUTReconciliation

Reconciliation Model TPH MEL & CEET Nov03 v/s Real Los Colorados Recalculated

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

Jul-02

Ago-02

Sep-02

Oct-02

Nov-02

Dic-02

Ene-03

Feb-03

Mar-03

Abr-03

May-03

Jun-03

Jul-03

Ago-03

Sep-03

Oct-03

Nov-03

Dic-03

Ene-04

Feb-04

Mar-04

Abr-04

May-04

Jun-04

TPH

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

% Dif

DIF REL Plant-Mod (BlkParc) TPH_Real LosColorados TPH_Recalc LosColorados

CEET Nov03 (MinnovEx) TPH MelNov03(BlkParc)

JUL02-OCT03 CALIBRATION FOR NOV2003 MODEL WEAK UNDERESTIMATION -1.3% RELATIVE

+0.7% RELATIVEUNDERESTIMATIONSUBJECT TOPLANT CHANGES

Page 12: Geometalurgia Bhp

BHP BILLITONMINERA ESCONDIDA LIMITADA

Pre-Crushed Feed for SAG Mills

Page 13: Geometalurgia Bhp

Throughput : Effect of “fines” –1/2”

Fines Effect on TPOH (-1/2")Laguna Seca y Los Colorados (SAG3)

y = 44,648x + 542,83R2 = 0,6192

y = 82,845x - 8,1522R2 = 0,9401

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

20 30 40 50 60 70

minus 1/2" (%)

TP

OH

LC_TPOH

LS_TPOH

Lineal (LC_TPOH)

Lineal (LS_TPOH)

Page 14: Geometalurgia Bhp

Factibilidad en licitación

8% a 10% aumento TPH cuando exista limitación SAG

MUS$ 20-25Planta de Prechancado

Estado ActualBeneficioInversiónProyecto

Pre-Crushed Feed

Se comienza a realizar un estudio a nivel conceptual.

Page 15: Geometalurgia Bhp

Alternativas a ser estudiadas :

a.- Planta de Chancado separada para Los Colorados y Para Laguna Seca.

b.- Planta de Clasificación, donde el bajo tamaño de harneros alimenta a los Colorados y el Sobre tamaño es tratado en planta de Chancado para alimentar Laguna Seca