john keys risk management on tunnelling projects warwick university msc course london bridge...

22
John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Upload: rachel-woods

Post on 17-Jan-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

John Keys

Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects

Warwick University MSc course

London Bridge Associates

Page 2: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Introduction to Risk Management

Identification of tunnelling risks Risk analysis and risk assessment tools

Introduction to the Risk Workshop

London Bridge Associates

Page 3: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

What is risk management? - Definitions

Hazard is something with the potential to cause harm or change the desired outcome

Risk is the likelihood of a hazard occurring x consequence of a hazard

Risk Analysis is the process of identifying risk factors and the quantification of those factors (estimating likelihood and magnitude of impacts)

Risk assessment is the tool whereby risks are evaluated in terms of their likelihood and consequence and mitigation measures identified

Risk Mitigation is the process of developing a plan to respond or deal with risk on a project

Risk Register is a method for recording the project risks for subsequent management

London Bridge Associates

Page 4: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Risk Assessment process

London Bridge Associates

Likelihood

Co

nse

qu

ence

Initial Risk

Residual Risk

Hierarchy of Risk reduction

Eliminate at Source

Control

Monitor

Unacceptable Risks

Negligible Risks

AL

AR

P

Zo

ne

Tolerable only if risk reduction is impracticable or if the cost is grossly disproportionate to the improvement gained

Tolerable if cost of reduction would exceed the improvement gained

Risk cannot be justified except in extraordinary circumstances

Page 5: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

What risk assessment tools are available?

Risk assessments can be undertaken using either

Qualitative judgements (high / medium / low risks )

or

Quantitative values (numerically as derived from case histories / databases)

Consider practicality of assessments

Availability of reliable data Diversity of each tunnel’s characteristics

London Bridge Associates

Page 6: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

What risk assessment tools are available?

Risk Analysis tools

Fault tree analysis

Event tree analysis

Decision tree analysis

London Bridge Associates

Page 7: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

London Bridge Associates

Why do we need Risk Management?

Why do we need Risk Management?

Page 8: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Identification of tunnelling risks?

The Joint Code states:

“Hazards shall be identified and evaluated on a project-specific basis and their consequent risks shall be identified and quantified by Risk Assessments through all stages of a project “

Project Development Stage (conceptual design) Detailed Design Stages Procurement Stage Construction Stage Operational stage for any stipulated maintenance period.

London Bridge Associates

Page 9: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Joint Code of Practice for TunnellingSection 8 – Design

Clause 8.3.1. states

“The fundamental objective of the design process is that of achieving a robust design, that is a design where the risk of failure or damage to the Tunnel Works or to a Third Party from all reasonably foreseeable causes, and including health and safety considerations, is extremely remote during the construction and the design life of the Tunnel Works. High consequence but low frequency events that could affect the works or a Third Party shall also be considered”

London Bridge Associates

Page 10: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Joint Code of Practice for TunnellingSection 8 – Design

Clause 8.3.4 states“The design process shall include, where appropriate, sensitivity studies to assess the impact of:a) construction tolerancesb) variation in geotechnical design valuesc) variation in materials characteristicsd) variation in workmanship and geometrye) methods of construction and the implementation of

mitigation/contingency measuresf) natural perils exposure in the region of the project

such as flood, storm, seismic or tidal effects

London Bridge Associates

Page 11: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Joint Code of Practice for TunnellingSection 8 – Design

Clause 8.5.1. states

“The Designer shall ensure that adequate construction expertise is available to undertake formal reviews of the design to assess and confirm the appropriateness of the design in terms of Constructability, including health and safety considerations in relation to BS6164”

London Bridge Associates

Page 12: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

London Bridge Associates

Risk Assessment and Control Measures

Work Activity / Brief description

Tunnel excavation

Risk Assessment No 1 Date: xx/xx/xxxx Sheet No of .

Name of Contractor XYZ Co Ltd Project: XXXXXXXXX

No Hazardous event

Persons at risk Including Nos

Evaluation Criteria

Risk Rating

Priority Rating

Control Measures

Persons at risk Including Nos

Evaluation Criteria

Risk Ratin

g

Residual Risk

Priority Rating

Likelihood

Severity 1 to 36 H / M / L Likelihood

Severity 1 to 36 H / M / L

1 Poor Ground conditions in the faulted zone lead to rock falls and /or a tunnel Collapse

10 4 6 24 H Design additional support measures for tunneling through the fault zone

10 2 6 12

M

2 Inundation of the tunnel when excavating through the fault

10 5 6 30 H Advance probe drill to dewater zone

10 2 6 12 M

3 Fire on diesel plant operating in the tunnel

10 3 6 18 H Install automatic fire suppression

10 1 6 6 L

4 Operative struck by moving plant when excavating

1 3 5 15 15 Provide remote control system

0 0 0 0 0

5 Trips and falls 10 3 1 4 4 Good House keeping

10 1 1 1 L

Likelihood - (1) Remote, (2) Unlikely, (3) Possible, (4) Likely, (5) Probable, (6) Highly Probable Severity - (1) Minor Injury (2) First Aid (3) Illness/Lost time, (4) Reportable, (5) Major Injury, (6) Fatality Risk Rating - Likelihood * Severity - Expressed as a number between 1 and 36 Priority Rating - This will either be Low (1 to 6 ), Medium (7 to 17) or High ( 18 to 36)

Page 13: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Questions?

London Bridge Associates

Page 14: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Risk Management Workshop

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Page 15: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Page 16: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Page 17: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Background to the project• $400m road tunnel in Australia• Ring road around the town of Yarra Awali• Client designed scheme• Funded by state taxes• Environmental constraints

• Golf course• Residential areas

• West Portal in a flood plain

Page 18: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Background to the project• Detailed design • 3km long 110m2 excavated face area• Boreholes / seismic surveys / Previous

borehole data• Tunnel alignment

• Minimise environmental impact• Steep gradients• Over burden• Utilities• High rise luxury hotel• Portals positioned to minimise impact• Conservation area and a flood plain• Old Quarry• Geology• Hydrology

Page 19: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Background to the project

Historical Land use• Ground water extraction for irrigation• Small dwellings still extract water• Local brewery• Abandoned quarry on west side

Page 20: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Background to the project

Contractual • NEC form of contract with all risks

transferred to the Contractor• Pain / Gain incentives• Design and Construct Contract • Novated design - NATM

methodology• Contractor to price risks• 1 month to bid the works

Page 21: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project

London Bridge Associates

Background to the project

• NATM construction method • Alternative designs• Cheapest tender submission $400m• Contractor lacked resources• JV Board decision on passing on risk

Page 22: John Keys Risk Management on Tunnelling Projects Warwick University MSc course London Bridge Associates

Dry Creek Road Tunnel Project• You are the construction company for the Dry Creek Road Tunnel project. • You have a meeting tomorrow with a group of Insurance Companies • The Insurer company have asked you to identify all the key risks and

convince them that you have the risks under control before they will provide cover to the project

Task 1• Your brief is to identify the top risks associated with the project and what

control measures you will be putting in place to manage those risks. • Rank the risks in order of priority starting with the highest risks first and an

explanation why you perceive these risks as priorities.

Task 2• Identify the actions and measures the Client and the Designer should have

put in place to ensure that the project had the greatest chance of success.

London Bridge Associates