lean six sigma for local and municipal government
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was made at the ICMA International Conference in Montreal on September 15, 2009 by Stacy Waters, Waters Consulting, and Stephen Deas of Quality Minds, Inc. The content covers six sigma and lean six sigma in the context of local and municipal governments. The audience was comprised mostly of city managers from around the world. The speakers defined six sigma and lean six sigma and gave great examples of how six sigma has been used by local governments.TRANSCRIPT
Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma for Municipal Government
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
ICMA Conference September 15, 2009
Presented by: Stacy Waters, MBA, CMCPrincipal and Executive Vice President for:
Presented by: Stephen Deas,CSSBBFounder and President for:
For more information about this presentation or related services, contact us at 800.899.1669 or via email at [email protected]
Since 1976, the firm has provided consulting services in the area of human resources consulting
Primary focus in the disciplines of Compensation; Strategic Management; Organization Design; Performance Management and Executive Recruitment
Nationwide services to a variety of organizations in the public and private sectors including:
•Cities, counties, other local government agencies
•Utility and transit authorities
•Government-related retirement systems
•Professional associations
A Brief Overview:The Waters Consulting Group, Inc.
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
2(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
A Brief Overview:Quality Minds, Inc
Human capital development and process improvement firm located in Charleston, SC. Areas of specialty include:
•Process and Quality Improvement
•Lean Tools and Techniques
•Lean Six Sigma
•Safety Improvement
•ASQ Certifications
•Process Mapping
•Statistical Process Control
3(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• What is Six Sigma?
• What is Lean?
• What is Lean Six Sigma?
• How is Six Sigma used to improve local government?
Session Outline
Lean: Improves Efficiency
Six Sigma: Improves Effectiveness
4(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• What does Lean Six Sigma Mean for Services?
– Applying Lean Six Sigma to Services
– Why Services are Full of Waste- and Ripe for Lean Six Sigma
• Why invest in Lean Six Sigma?
Lean Six Sigma for Strategic Advantages
5(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• Why you may need BOTH Lean and Six Sigma
• Knowing the difference between Lean and Six Sigma
• What Six Sigma has to offer
• What Lean has to offer
• Why does Lean need Six Sigma?
• Why does Six Sigma need Lean?
Getting Faster to Get Better
Lean: Improves Efficiency
Six Sigma: Improves Effectiveness
6(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• There are many case studies on the Internet regarding local
government
• We use Fort Wayne, Indiana – but there are many other examples
• Lean Six Sigma for Service (by Michael George)
Case Studies and Reference Materials
Lean Six Sigma
7(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• Lockheed Martin has been using Six Sigma and Lean since the late 90s.
• Named "Consumer Driven 6-Sigma" for a reason, Ford’s aim is to address customer issues first: Over 70,000 Green Belts in North America.
• Dominion Energy is now in its 10th year of an enterprise-wide Six Sigma initiative. Their unique approach encourages the entrepreneurial spirit and has led to over $300 million in savings since 2001.
• From recruiting to the Bradley fighting vehicle (and everything in between - including meal scheduling), the US Army continues to improve processes and save dollars through Lean Six Sigma. They anticipate reaching a $3 billion-savings mark this year after five years of practicing LSS.
Lean and Six Sigma “Believers”
8(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Google “municipal governments using six sigma” or “cities using six sigma” and find on the front page:
– Fort Wayne, Indiana (2000): Mayor introduced Six Sigma as the sole process for improving government administrative and civic services (23K hits)
– Buffalo, New York (2008): Municipal Housing Authority used Six Sigma to improve the 72 step process for reserving a park shelter (46/72 steps were identified as waste)
– Hattiesburg, Mississippi (2008): One project involved simplifying the cost it takes to tear down a building
9
Six Sigma in Government – Quick Examples
(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
General Overview of Six Sigma,
Lean, and Lean Six Sigma
Basic Overview of Six Sigma and Lean
What they have in common Six Sigma
Structured approach to improve processes, quality,
cost, (Effectiveness)
Lean
Result of using different tools to eliminate waste from processes (Efficiency)
Customer Focused Top project priority is with customers
Give the customer what she wants, when she wants it
Organization Development Six Sigma can change work cultures
Organization is more aware of wasteful activity
Human Capital Development Internal employees are thoroughly trained to lead projects
Workers see jobs differently, workers respect work environment more
Results Oriented Projects have quick completion times and, as much as possible, are measured using financial criteria
Waste is eliminated from business processes, work becomes quicker and more efficient
11(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Six Sigma
Waste
Waste
eliminated
Efficiency improvement
Improved business processes
Customer Complaints
Incapable processes
Excessive costs
Poor quality of service
Lean
D
M
A
IC
Six Sigma is a mechanism for becoming Lean.Six Sigma is a mechanism for becoming Lean.
Lean Six Sigma Visualized
12(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Customer “Wants” Vs. Production
What the Customer Wants-you must know this and incorporate it into your work
What we Produce-you must be measuring this and understand how
well your production meets what your customer wants
Exceeds what customer
wants
Fails to meet minimum
requirement
Sigma is a measure of variation
The Six Sigma methodology systematically improves work processes to reliably meet the customer’s requirements.
13(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
The “Cost” of Doing Things Wrong
• Things done right 99.9% of the time means that there are things done wrong
0.1% of the time…
– One hour of unsafe drinking water per month
– Two unsafe landings at O’Hare International Airport each day
– 16,000 lost pieces of mail per hour
– 20,000 incorrect drug prescriptions per year
– 500 incorrect surgical operations per week
– 50 newborn babies dropped each day by hospital staff
– 22,000 checks per hour deducted from the wrong account
14(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
The Time it Takes to Complete a Work Task
Worker One
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Same Work Task Timed Multiple Times
Waste
Actual WorkTime
15(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
The Context of Six SigmaSystems and Processes
System (A collection of processes that work together for a definite purpose)
Municipal Government (Human Resources)
P1 P2 P3 (Hiring)
P4 P5 P6 P7 P8
P3 Step 1 P3 Step 2 P3 Step 3 P3 Step 4
Human Resource Processes
Inputs Outputs
The Role of Systems and Processes
17(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Supplier Inputs Process Output Customer
Who supplies each input?
What does this process need in order to produce good output?
Job requirement
Job description
Resumes
Interviewers
Interview process
Candidates
What are the steps that are followed to hire someone?
What is the output of the process?
A new employee
Who are the internal and external customers of this process?
In short, six sigma methodology identifies the key inputs that drive success of outputs. Once identified, actions are taken to improve the inputs in order to improve the outputs.
The Hiring Process as an Example
18(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Six Sigma Leadership
Leadership Support makes the Difference:
Deming’s 85/15 Rule: 85% of problems in any organization are within the system and are the responsibility of leadership while only 15% lie with the worker
• Systems are made of processes. Processes are used by workers to produce products and/or services. If the system is bad, the processes are bad and consequently service and/or product will be bad.
Specific Support Needed for Six Sigma Success:
• Careful planning and implementation
• Proper resources allocated
• Commitment beyond low hanging fruit
Leadership’s Role in Deployment
20(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Executive Sponsors
Overseer of Six Sigma Program
BB
GB
BB
GB
Select projects, knock down barriers, be the leadership representative for project team
(BB) Black belts manage projects. This is typically a full time job/responsibility.
(GB) Green belts are black belts in training. Green belts are usually not full time positions
For Example: City Manager, City Council, Mayor
For Example: Department Heads, Quality Enhancement Director
Process Owners-subject matter experts
Six Sigma Leadership Structure - Example
21(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Linking Projects to Goals and Organizational Performance
Strategic Level(project selection is the responsibility of leadership)
Department Level-also called
tactical level
Division Level-also
called working level
Division Level
Department Level
Projects should come from the “hopper”
Project Hopper
Leadership must consistently review department level
indicators and create the “project hopper”
City Manager, City Council, Mayor
Human Resources
BenefitsCompensation
Sources for ProjectsCustomer complaints-should always be priority #1Internal issuesCost driversEmployee surveysPerformance reviews
22(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
The Six Sigma ProcessDefine
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
Two Levels of Six Sigma
• Basic– Most projects can be successful using basic tools in
each of the five steps
• Advanced– Some projects will need to use advanced tools.
(Puts heavy emphasis on Black Belt.)
24(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
S
Supplier
I
Inputs
P
Process
O
Output
C
CustomerTeam Members
Team Members
Team Members
Black Belt
Team Members
Team Members
Leadership
Team Members
Project Scope
Project Goals
Due Dates
Tools
Ideas
Observations
Mentor
Process Importance
Develop a definition of the improvement opportunity
A project charter
Measure phase
It is important to develop a clear and thorough definition of the opportunity for improvement.
Define Phase
25(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• What are Stakeholders?
• Those who could be impacted by the results of the project
• Those that must support any change proposed in the project
• Who Could Stakeholders be?
• Managers of the process
• People working in the process
• Internal and External Customers of the process
• Suppliers to the process
• Finance support of the process
Identifying Project Stakeholders
26(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• A written document that defines the project team, team leader, project mission, process scope, business case for project, goals for projects, and time frames for project.
• Charters can be created by top management or teams can create their own charter
The Project Charter
27(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
S
Supplier
I
Inputs
P
Process
O
Output
C
CustomerBlack Belt
Team Members
Team Leader
Black Belt
Define Phase
Black Belt
Team Members
Tools
Data
Video Recorder
Software
Project Charter
Stop Watch
Ideas and opinions
Measure the process’ performance
A map of the process
A current state of performance
Analyze phase
Once you identify the process to be improved, study and document the process to understand its current state of performance
Measure Phase
28(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
S
Supplier
I
Inputs
P
Process
O
Output
C
CustomerBlack Belt
Black Belt
Black Belt
Measure phase
Tools
Forms
Software
Current state of process performance
Analyze the process to determine root causes
A root cause statement
Improve phase
Once you measure the process, analyze the results of the measurement to establish tangible opportunities for improvement.
Analyze Phase
29(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Improve Phase
S
Supplier
I
Inputs
P
Process
O
Output
C
CustomerTeam Members
Team Leader
Team Members
Leadership
Analyze Phase
Black Belt
Ideas
Focus
Patience
Time
Root cause statement
Tools
Improve the process by attacking the root cause(s)
(Plan-Do-Check-Act)
An improved process or a solved problem
Control phase
Take actions on the tangible improvement opportunities from the Analyze Phase.
30(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
PDCA Cycle of Improvement
Do
Check
Act
Now you must decide what actions to take as a result of your check. The options typically include: •Adopt the change•Abandon it and go back to the drawing board•Run it through the cycle again using a different area, running a larger scale trial, or making the trial more complex.
PlanTo improve processes, first find out what areas need improvement. Based on what you learn, plan a change or test.
Once you have a plan, carry out the change or test on a small scale
After completing the Do phase, check to see if the changes or tests are working (What did you learn? What went right? What went wrong? What does the data mean?)
31(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
S
Supplier
I
Inputs
P
Process
O
Output
C
CustomerBlack Belt
Team Members
Leadership
Improve phase
Tools
Ideas
Follow up
Improved process
Control the improved process to sustain the improvement
A stable and predictable process
Internal and/or external customers of the improved process
Implement controls to sustain the process improvement. If you do not, the process may revert back to previous performance levels.
Control Phase
32(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Using Six Sigma to Increase Performance in City Government:
Fort Wayne, Indiana – Six Sigma Introduced in 2000
How They Did It
*In the first three years of deployment:
– Trained more than 20 Black Belts and 40 Green Belts
– Launched 60 projects resulting in direct savings (or avoidance of expected costs) of approximately $3 million
– Gained many less tangible improvements with quality and service improvements – not to mention employee morale
*Lean Six Sigma for Service©
34(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
*Some Highlights
• Goal: A safer city – Now Fire Department performs more than 23% more re-inspections a year without additional staffing.
• Goal: Reduce street complaints – Now 98% of potholes repaired within 24 hours (down from an average of 80 hours for a repair)
• Goal: Stop variation in the cost of transportation engineering projects – Now only 14% of projects exceed their estimates by more than 10%
• Goal: Reduce citizen complaints about tree trimming – Now rate of complaint calls reduced by 33% through determining the optimum level of communication methods
*Lean Six Sigma for Service©
35(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
MayorExecutive Council
(Deployment Team)
Quality Enhancement
Director
Master Black Belt
10 black belts were trained and each had to complete a City- approved project each year.
Fort Wayne’s Six Sigma Structure
Strategic
Tactical
Working
36(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
• City Challenges– More people, more territory– Revenue down– Demands for service up– State and federal mandates up– Tornadoes, terrorism, floods
• Questions Posed– Who is your customer?– Is your service improving?– How do you measure
improvement?– Show me the data
1999 2006 % Change
Population 190,000 252,000 33%
Non-public safety employees
936 950 2%
Miles of roads
850 1200 41%
Square miles
79 109 39%
More Services, Fewer Employees
From City Leadership
37(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Project Results CommentReduce amount of late garbage pickups
Reduced amount of late garbage pickups by 50%
Also improved relationship between city and contractor
Reduce time to repair potholes Reduced average pothole repair time from 2 days to 3 hours
Improved communication and increased repair capacity
Improve business permit accuracy and approval time
Approval time reduced by 300% More business was attracted to Fort Wayne
Improve efficiency of waste water treatment processes
Efficiency improved 300% beyond goal, city avoided $1.7 million purchase of new equipment
Improve process for managing street light inventory
Process improved such that $500,000 was saved and freed for other areas
Reduced street light inventories to optimal levels by establishing proper tracking and control practices
Other Notable Results:
1. 2005 City Budget ($229,539,522): 5% savings due to projects ($11,476,976)
2. From 2000-2005, 60 projects completed by city workers
Other Fort Wayne Projects & Results
38(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Steps in Getting Started
When to Use Lean Six Sigma?
• Unknown causes to problems/ongoing challenges and “situations”
• Problems are frequent, common but not well defined; lots of “noise” and disruption
• A “broad brush” approach is not appropriate
• When other problem solving methods fail
• In complex situations with many variables
40(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Choosing a Pilot Project
• Select the right project
• Select the right team members
• Get outside help on your first project
• Become self sufficient
41(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Six Sigma Belts – Leading the Initiative
• First things first, get certified – get team certified
• Three levels of Belts: Green; Black; Master Black Belt
• Belts are based on level of competence in understanding and applying tools
• Actual definition and competencies for each belt can vary by organization and training institutions
42(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 1 – Slow and Steady
• Public sector organizations should expect to have a longer learning curve with the first few projects because:
1. Most staff will not have hada prior history of formal quality initiatives.
2. Training of Black Belts takes time, energy, commitment. Prepare for this to be the focus of the first six months at least.
43(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 2 – Persistence
• Expect to be faced with having to overcome long-held patterns of behavior
• Silo-ing of departments provides a lot of protection and security for individuals – so be prepared to face the challenge of this
• Continue to deliver the message of change with persistence, commitment and respect to all affected in the process
44(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 3 – Use the Tools
• Process Maps help people understand what is going on
• Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) helps people prevent problems before they happen and provides control and structure
• Utilize tools to help keep things on track and shape the desired results for success
45(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 4 – Communicate
• Having a team that is dedicated to communication is vital when change is in the air
• Making sure the right and accurate message is communicated
• Keeping the project on track
• Maintaining commitment and consistency
• This goes for internal and external communications
46(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 5 – Praise and Recognition
• Maintaining commitment and consistency
• People like to be recognized for their efforts and contribution.
47(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Tip 6 – Involvement
• Have a mixture of people from front line to management to union
• The team for a project should consist of the people that “touch the problem” the most
• If the project is controversial, the selection of team members is even more critical
48(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Benefits of Lean Six Sigma Projects
• Internal Benefits– Reduced claims filed– Overtime reduction– More positive public image– Higher morale– Positive change in culture and effectiveness
• External Benefits– Safer organizational initiatives– Improved customer service– Improved relations with neighborhood associations– Overall better local, regional and even national image
49(c)2009 The Waters Consulting Group, Inc. and Quality Minds
Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma for Municipal Government
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
THE WATERSCONSULTINGGROUP, INC.
ICMA Conference September 15, 2009
Presented by: Stacy Waters, MBA, CMCPrincipal and Executive Vice President for:
Presented by: Stephen Deas, CSSBBFounder and President for:
For more information about this presentation or related services, contact us at 800.899.1669 or via email at [email protected]